东菱迪夫联合依达拉奉治疗进展性脑梗死疗效观察

目的观察依达拉奉联合东菱迪夫(DF-521)治疗急性脑梗死的有效性和安全性。方法采用随机、平行、设立对照组对照试验,选择发病48h内的ACI患者61例,随机分成治疗组和对照组。治疗组给予依达拉奉30mg静滴,2次/d,共10d,DF-521 10U、5 U、5U静滴,分别于第1、3、5d应用,共3次;依达拉奉组给予依达拉奉30mg静滴,2次/d,共10d,阿司匹林150mg口服,1次/d;对照组给予步复迈250ml静滴,1次/d,共10d,大剂量盐酸纳洛酮2 g静滴,1次/d,共10d,阿司匹林150mg口服,1次/d。根据脑卒中病人临床疗效评分标准进行疗效评定。结果4周后治疗组NIHSS及ADL均明显高于对照组,治疗后纤维蛋白原(FDP)较前明显下降,而血小板、红细胞比积、出凝血时间及肾功能无明显改变;并且治疗组无明显不良反应。结论依达拉奉联合东菱迪夫治疗进展性脑梗死安全有效。     

依达拉奉联合奥扎格雷钠治疗急性脑梗死的疗效观察

目的 探讨依达拉奉联合奥扎格雷钠治疗急性脑梗死的有效性和安全性.方法 将90例急性脑梗死患者随机分为2组,治疗组45例,常规治疗基础上应用依达拉奉30mg加生理盐水100ml,静滴,2次/d,奥扎格雷钠80mg加生理盐水100ml,静滴,2次/d.对照组45例,常规治疗基础上只应用奥扎格雷钠80mg加生理盐水100ml,静滴,2次/d.2周后行疗效评定.结果 治疗组有效率91%,对照组有效率80%.结论 依达拉奉联合奥扎格雷钠治疗急性脑梗死疗效肯定,有效改善急性脑梗死的神经功能缺失.     

尤瑞克林联合依达拉奉治疗急性脑梗死疗效观察

目的探讨尤瑞克林联合依达拉奉治疗急性脑梗死的临床疗效及安全性。方法将60例急性脑梗死患者随机分成2组,治疗组30例,在常规治疗基础上加用尤瑞克林0．15PNA静滴,1次／d,依达拉奉30mg加生理盐水100ml静滴,2次／d。对照组30例,在常规治疗基础上用血塞通0．4g加生理盐水250ml静滴,1次／d。2周后行疗效评定。结果治疗组有效率91％,对照组有效率80％。结论尤瑞克林联合依达拉奉治疗急性脑梗死的疗效肯定,有效改善急性脑梗死的神经功能缺失,且不良反应少。     

依达拉奉治疗急性脑梗死50例临床分析

目的观察依达拉奉注射液治疗急性脑梗死（ACI）的临床有效性和安全性。方法采用随机对照试验,选择确诊的ACI患者100例,随机分为依达拉奉治疗组（50例）及对照组（50例）。治疗组给予依达拉奉注射液30 mg静滴,2次/d,共14 d,同时给予血塞通0.4 g静滴,阿司匹林作为基础治疗;对照组除不用依达拉奉外余均同治疗组。结果4周后,2组NIHSS评分均有所改善,但治疗组疗效明显优于对照组（P〈0.05）,无明显不良反应。结论依达拉奉治疗ACI安全有效,能明显改善临床症状,降低致残率。     

依达拉奉联合丹参酮ⅡA治疗急性脑梗死疗效观察

目的 观察依达拉奉联合丹参酮ⅡA注射液治疗急性脑梗死的疗效与安全性.方法 将70例急性脑梗死患者随机分为2组,治疗组35例,应用依达拉奉注射液30 mg,加入生理盐水250 mL静滴,2次/d,丹参酮IIA注射液60 mg,加入生理盐水250 mL静滴,1次/d,连用14 d为一疗程.对照组35例,应用疏血通注射液6 mL加入生理盐水250 mL静滴,1次/d,14 d一疗程.结果 治疗组总有效率88.57%,对照组总有效率60.00%,2组比较差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05).结论 依达拉奉加丹参酮ⅡA治疗急性脑梗死疗效肯定,安全有效.     

依达拉奉治疗进展性脑梗死的近期疗效观察

目的 探讨依达拉奉对进展性脑梗死的近期临床疗效.方法 132例进展性脑梗死患者随机分为2组依达拉奉治疗组,n=66,依达拉奉30mg加入生理盐水100ml静滴,2次/d;维脑路通对照组,n=66,维脑路通600mg,加入生理盐水200ml静滴,1次/d.于治疗前、治疗后7d、14d和21d比较依达拉奉治疗组和对照组神经功能缺损评分(ESS)和Barthel指数的差异.结果 依达拉奉在治疗后时间段与对照组相比,ESS评分和Barthel指数明显升高(P＜0.01).结论 依达拉奉能明显改善进展性脑梗死患者神经功能,是进展性脑梗死的有效治疗药物.     

依达拉奉与疏血通联合治疗急性脑梗死疗效观察

目的 观察依达拉奉联合疏血通治疗急性脑梗死的临床疗效.方法 70例急性脑梗死患者随机分为2组.治疗组40例,依达拉奉30 mg,加入生理盐水250 ml联用疏血通注射液6 ml加5%葡萄糖或生理盐水250 ml静滴,1次/d.对照组30例采用低分右旋糖酐500 ml,复方丹参注射液16 ml静滴,1次/d.2组均为20 d一个疗程,其他辅助及对症治疗相同.结果 治疗组临床疗效优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05 ).结论 依达拉奉联合疏血通注射液治疗急性脑梗死疗效满意,值得临床推广应用.     

依达拉奉治疗急性脑梗死76例临床分析

目的 观察依达拉奉治疗急性脑梗死的临床疗效.方法 选择76例急性脑梗死患者,随机分为治疗组42例,对照组34例,2组均给予缺血性脑血管病常规治疗,治疗组同时给予依达拉奉30mg静滴,2次/d,14d为一个疗程.治疗前,治疗后7d、14d、21d分别进行一次神经功能缺损评分、欧洲卒中量表评分、Barthel生活质量评分,观察治疗效果.结果 治疗21d后治疗组总有效率95.24%,对照组总有效率79.41%,2组之间疗效有显著差异(P<0.05).结论 依达拉奉治疗急性脑梗死安全有效,值得临床应用.     

依达拉奉注射液治疗脑梗死的疗效观察

目的观察依达拉奉注射液治疗急性脑梗死的临床疗效。方法将急性脑梗死患者80例随机分为2组:对照组40例应用奥扎格雷注射液80 mg,加入250 mL生理盐水中静滴,2次/d,共14 d;治疗组40例,在对照组的治疗基础上加用依达拉奉注射液30 mg,加入100 mL生理盐水中静滴,2次/d,共14 d;治疗前后监测神经功能缺损评分。结果治疗组与对照组2组间疗效比较差异有统计学意义。结论依达拉奉注射液治疗急性脑梗死有效、安全。     

依达拉奉联合奥扎格雷钠治疗急性脑梗死疗效观察

目的评价依达拉奉与奥扎格雷钠治疗急性脑梗死的临床疗效。方法急性脑梗死136例根据用药不同分为2组,均应用阿司匹林肠溶片100mg口服,1次/d;血栓通针0.5g静滴,1次/d。对照组加用奥扎格雷钠针80mg静滴,1次/d,共14d。治疗组在对照组用药基础上,加用依达拉奉30mg静滴,2次/d,共14d。结果根据神经功能缺损评分标准进行疗效评定,2组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论依达拉奉与奥扎格雷钠治疗急性脑梗死具有协同作用,且疗效好。     

Treatment with rituximab in patients with polyneuropathy with anti-MAG antibodies

Journal of Neurology -     

Factors associated with satisfaction with care among patients with epilepsy

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the work described here was to determine those variables associated with satisfaction with care among patients with epilepsy. METHODS: We interviewed patients followed at a tertiary epilepsy center. Predictor variables included age, gender, race, education, income, insurance, seizure frequency, and Quality of Life in Epilepsy-10 inventory (QOLIE-10) results. Target variables were the subscales of the Short Form Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSQ-18). We used univariate analysis to identify those variables significantly associated with the subscales and multiple linear regression to determine those independently significant. RESULTS: The study population comprised 193 patients. Lower education and better QOLIE-10 scores were independently associated with general satisfaction with care. The mental health scale was associated with general satisfaction with care. Lower educational level was the only variable independently associated with patient satisfaction with communication, the financial aspect of care, and time spent with physician. CONCLUSION: Lower educational level and better quality of life are the main variables associated with higher general satisfaction with care among patients with epilepsy.     

Children with ADHD and motor dysfunction compared with children with ADHD only

The purpose of this study was to identify group differences in children with attention-deficit-hyperactivity disorder and motor dysfunction (ADHD-MD) and ADHD only, and to evaluate the medication responsiveness of ADHD-MD. Sixty-three children (49 males and 14 females; mean age 9 years 10 months, SD 2 years 10 months) underwent a triple blind, placebo-controlled crossover study evaluating two dose levels of methylphenidate (0.3 mg/kg and 0.5 mg/kg [corrected], twice daily) and placebo. Forty-nine trials were completed. Nineteen were children with ADHD-MD, 44 had ADHD only. Behavior and functioning were assessed at home and at school. Treatment effects were assessed using the Abbreviated Symptom Questionnaire for Parents and Teachers. Children with ADHD-MD were more likely to have severe ADHD-combined type and other neurodevelopmental and behavioral problems. Both groups of children had a linear dose response to medication (placebo, low, high) and there was no evidence of a group by dose interaction or an overall group effect at home or school. The lack of group effect suggests that these children responded to medication like the other subgroups.     

Chronic headache with vasospasm treated with nimodipine

Journal of Neurology -