Distress and concerns in couples referred to a specialist infertility clinic

OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to examine emotional distress and infertility-related concerns in male and female members of couples referred to a specialist infertility clinic and to determine changes in these over time. METHODS: A prospective cohort study with a 6-month follow-up. Emotional distress was measured using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, and concerns by a specially designed questionnaire. RESULTS: The response rate achieved was 38%. At baseline, 25.7% of women and 8.9% of men had scores of greater than 10 on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Anxiety subscale, and 2.7% of women and 1.8% of men had scores of greater than 10 on the HADS Depression subscale. At 6-month follow-up the HADS scores were substantially unchanged. Females reported a significantly greater infertility-related concerns regarding life satisfaction, sexuality, self-blame, self-esteem and avoidance of friends compared with males. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of emotional disorder identified was low. There were gender differences in the nature of the specific concerns reported. The degree of distress and concerns did not change significantly over time. There are a minority of patients, mainly females, with clinically significant distress and infertility-related concerns amongst patients attending infertility clinics who deserve psychological attention.     

Comparison of a questionnaire commonly used for measuring coping with a daily-basis prospective coping measure

BACKGROUND: Much research have investigated the relation between stress and health, with focus on the role of coping as a moderator. The use of the concept of coping is in need of more stringency since it is often used in a more or less careless manner. A contributory cause of the confusion within the research field is the often-negligent interpretation of results from the Mental Adjustment to Cancer (MAC) Scale (i.e., results are discussed in terms of coping strategies instead of mental adjustment). Furthermore, checklists are often used in research but seldom specify the stressor that patients are attempting to cope with. METHODS: Consecutive patients newly diagnosed with gastrointestinal (GI) cancer were included in this study. Of 151 eligible patients, 95 (63%) participated. As soon as their physical condition so permitted, patients were asked to assess their coping by way of two methods: an instrument commonly used for measuring coping (MAC Scale) and a daily-basis prospective coping measure [Daily Coping Assessment (DCA)]. The study investigated the relations between these two methods, which are used to evaluate different ways of coping with cancer, and related these to specified stressful events and psychologic distress outcomes [Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)]. RESULTS: Among patients with GI cancers, a comparison of the DCA with the MAC Scale renders important differences regarding the use of coping strategies. Furthermore, coping as measured by the DCA is more clearly separated from both stressors such as psychologic aspects and psychologic distress outcomes as measured by the HADS. DISCUSSION: A comparison between the two measures renders differences regarding the use of coping strategies among patients with GI cancers. The daily-basis prospective coping measure seems to be better separated from both stressful events and psychologic distress outcomes. The DCA offers a promising alternative to the use of coping checklists. The difference between the measures is in accordance with the original intention that the MAC Scale be used to measure mental adjustment rather than coping (i.e., the results do not support the use of the MAC Scale as a coping measure).     

Psychological distress among cancer patients and informed consent

This study examines the relationships between satisfaction with information provided, understanding of consent procedures, and levels of anxiety/depression in a sample of patients undergoing radiotherapy for cancer. One hundred patients completed a 13-item self-report questionnaire and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Twenty-two percent of patients could not recall signing a consent form and, for those who did recall, the level of understanding for what they had consented to was patchy. One fourth of patients could not recall being told of the side-effects from radiotherapy and were unable to list even common side-effects, such as tiredness, skin irritation, and sickness. No patient had been told about the low risk of second malignancy. Twenty-eight percent of patients were unhappy with the amount of information offered to them. Thirty percent of patients reached caseness for adjustment disorder +/- anxiety/depression. Thirteen percent of patients reached caseness for major depression. There was a significant correlation between patients who scored highly on the HADS and dissatisfaction with the information provided. Clinical implications and possible mechanisms of these findings are discussed.     

Quality of life and psychological problems in patients undergoing neurological rehabilitation

Aim:

To assess the quality of life (QoL) and prevalence of psychological problems (PP) in patients with neurological illness, and their correlation with functional abilities.

Materials and Methods:

Prospective cross-sectional study conducted in the neurological rehabilitation unit of tertiary research hospital in 30 consecutive hospitalized patients (21 men), age 16-55 years (34.63±11.87).

Outcome Measure:

WHOQoL-BREF was used to assess QoL. The prevalence of PP was recorded using Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale (HADS) and General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12). QoL and HADS scores were correlated with functional abilities using mean Barthel Index (BI) Score.

Results:

The duration of illness was three to 30 months (10.63±7.83) and their primary diagnoses were stroke 12, traumatic spinal cord injury seven and non-traumatic spinal cord lesion 11. Twenty-two patients qualified for GHQ-12 caseness, with 15 patients having distress (score ≥15) and seven having severe problem and psychological distress (score≥20). Twenty five patients had abnormal anxiety and 17 had abnormal depression on HADS (abnormal = 8-21), with moderate to severe anxiety and depression (scores≥11) in nine and three patients respectively. The mean WHOQoL-BREF transformed scores (on WHOQoL 0-100 scale) were (38.83±8.02), (50.76±9.79), (48.53±18.46) and (49.13±10.63) in physical, psychological, social, and environmental domains respectively. The social domain of QoL had significant correlation (P<.05) with functional abilities.

Conclusion:

Patients with neurological disorders requiring inpatient rehabilitation have impaired QoL that affects all domains of life. There is high prevalence of psychological problems, including anxiety and depression. The social domain of QoL adversely affected functional abilities, but the correlation between PP and functional abilities was insignificant.     

Using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale to screen for depression in cardiac patients

OBJECTIVE: There is an increasing interest in trying to identify patients with chronic physical illness who would benefit from interventions to decrease psychological distress. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) is one measure that can be effectively used to identify patients struggling with anxiety and/or depression in addition to comorbid medical illness such as cardiac disease. The aim of this study is to determine if the HADS correctly identified patients with depression according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition [determined using the Primary Care Evaluation of Mental Disorders (PRIME-MD), a gold-standard diagnostic tool], as depressed and to determine which items on the HADS most strongly predicted the PRIME-MD major depression diagnosis among cardiac patients. METHOD: Patient data were obtained from a randomized controlled trial of treatment for psychological distress in patients surviving recent myocardial infarction or life-threatening ischemic heart disease. The HADS was used to evaluate depression and/or anxiety among patients hospitalized for heart disease, and the PRIME-MD was used to diagnose major depressive disorder (MDD) in these patients. We used receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves and logistic regression to analyze patient responses to both of these measures. RESULTS: Among the 79 study patients, the area under the ROC curve (AUC) for the HADS depression subscale was 0.81 with an S.E. of 0.05, and the AUC was 0.70 for the HADS anxiety subscale with an S.E. of 0.06. Using a cutoff of 7 on each HADS subscale to determine PRIME-MD diagnosis of MDD, the sensitivity and specificity were 81% and 54%, respectively, for the depression subscale and 81% and 40%, respectively, for the anxiety subscale. In addition, a few individual HADS items predicted PRIME-MD diagnosis of MDD, namely, concentration and positive anticipation (depression items) and relaxed and worry (anxiety items), each of which were strongly correlated with PRIME-MD diagnosis of MDD. Finally, items positive anticipation and relaxed provided reasonable approximations to the results found from the HADS depression subscale measure, which performed better than the HADS anxiety subscale in predicting PRIME-MD diagnosis of depression. CONCLUSIONS: Using the HADS to detect mental disorders in primary care populations can save valuable physician time, and perhaps ensure that patients are treated for their mental distress as well as medical disease.     

Psychological state, quality of life, and coping style in patients with digestive cancer

The purpose of this study was to assess the relationships between psychological characteristics such as anxiety and depression, quality of life (QOL) and coping style among patients with digestive cancer. The subjects were 85 in-patients who were scheduled to undergo initial surgery for gastrointestinal cancer. The following psychological tests were administered: Japanese versions of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Zung's Self-Rating Depression Scale, the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ C30 and the Coping Inventory for Stressful Situations. The first 3 tests were performed on three occasions: before surgery, before discharge and 6 months after discharge. The results showed that there was no change over the 3 test administration days for the average scores of anxiety and that the scores of depression increased from before surgery to before discharge and did not return to presurgery levels at 6 months after discharge. Changes in each subscale score of the EORTC QLQ C30 across the 3 days displayed two typical trends. Relationships between the abovementioned trends and individual coping styles showed that the higher the score of "emotion-oriented coping style," the greater the deterioration in QOL subscales. It was suggested that focusing on a patient's coping style, particularly emotion-oriented coping style, is important and that patients likely to adopt a more emotion-oriented coping style should receive special consideration.     

Coping, affective distress, and psychosocial adjustment among people with traumatic upper limb amputations

OBJECTIVE: This study investigated the prevalence of symptoms of depression and anxiety in a sample of predominantly elderly males with acquired upper limb amputations (n=138) and examined the contribution of coping strategies to the prediction of psychosocial adjustment. METHOD: One hundred and thirty-eight men with injury-related upper limb amputations completed self-report questionnaires assessing coping strategies, symptoms of anxiety and depression, and psychosocial adaptation to prosthesis use. RESULTS: Prevalence of significant depressive symptoms was 28.3% [Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Depression subscale (HADS-D) score > or =8]. Prevalence of significant anxiety symptoms was 35.5% [HADS Anxiety subscale (HADS-A) score > or =8]. Coping styles emerged as important predictors of psychosocial adaptation. In particular, avoidance was strongly associated with psychological distress and poor adjustment. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest the potential benefits of interventions to reduce reliance on avoidant coping and stimulate more problem-focused approaches to coping with difficulties and challenges in order to facilitate adaptation and prevent problems in psychosocial functioning postamputation.     

Validity and reliability of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale in a hypertrophic cardiomyopathy clinic: the HADS in a cardiomyopathy population

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is the validation of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) in patients suffering from hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in an inner city teaching hospital. The secondary objective was to establish whether the use of the total HADS score to detect "caseness" is justified. METHODS: One hundred fifteen patients in a cardiac outpatient clinic completed the HADS, which was compared against the gold standard Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R nonpatient version (SCID-np). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were created for the anxiety and depression subscales, as well as the total score, then sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios and positive and negative predictive values were calculated. Retest correlation was assessed at 2 weeks in 31 patients. RESULTS: The depression subscale was highly sensitive (100%) when the cutoff score 8 was used; however, the corresponding specificity was poor (79%). Raising the cutoff to 10 improved specificity but compromised sensitivity. The anxiety subscale was performed similarly though with less accuracy. The total HADS score produced a poor ROC curve and performed best when the cutoff was 14. CONCLUSIONS: The HADS performs well as a screening instrument for anxiety and depression in this population at the designed cutoff score 8. However, its use as a research instrument and the practice of using the total score to detect caseness are not supported by this study.     

Emotional distress and needs for psychosocial support among breast cancer patients at start of radiotherapy

Radiotherapy is considered to be associated with psychological distress in cancer patients. The present pilot study was aimed at exploring both emotional distress and support needs among patients with primary breast cancer. 77 women were evaluated at the start of radiotherapy after completion of their breast-conserving surgical treatment. Emotional distress was measured with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and the Hornheider Questionnaire. Needs for additional psychosocial support as well as acceptance of support were assessed by single items. In addition to the patients' views, ratings from physicians, nurses and technical assistants were obtained. Although according to their self-reports only one third of the patients wished to talk about their disease and almost all of them had sufficient opportunities for discussions with their family members, 36 % reported needs for additional support and 75 % said that they would be willing to accept support in the case that it would be offered to them. Emotional distress and support needs were rated even higher by the members of the medical team. 20 % of the patients had high values (> 10) on the anxiety subscale and 5 % had high values (> 10) on the depression subscale of the HADS. 37 % were distressed according to the Hornheider Questionnaire. However, neither the HADS nor the Hornheider Questionnaire were sufficiently sensitive and specific to detect those patients reporting support needs. It was concluded that better screening tools have to be developed for identifying breast cancer patients in need of psychosocial support during radiotherapy.     

Psychiatric morbidity and cognitive representations of illness in chronic daily headache

OBJECTIVES: We studied patients with chronic daily headache (CDH) attending a headache clinic. Our hypothesis was that patients with anxiety or depression would have poorer functional status and differing cognitive representations of illness than would those without psychiatric morbidity. METHODS: The sample consisted of 144 consecutive new patients. Patients underwent a semistructured interview and completed a prospective headache diary, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and other health-related questionnaires. RESULTS: Sixty patients (42%) were probable cases of anxiety or depression on the basis of their HADS score. These HADS-positive cases had longer, more severe headaches, were more worried about them, were more functionally impaired and believed that their illness would last longer. Principal components analysis revealed that the HADS-positive cases believed that psychological factors play a role in their headaches. CONCLUSIONS: Psychological morbidity is high amongst CDH patients who attend specialist clinics. In addition to identifying those with high levels of psychological distress, the HADS can be used to predict those likely to have worse headaches and poorer functional ability.