Suppression of Interictal Spikes and Seizures by Stimulation of the Vagus Nerve

The effects of electrical stimulation of the vagus nerve, a proposed treatment for patients with intractable epilepsy, on focal interictal spikes produced by penicillin and EEG secondarily generalized seizures induced by pentylenetetrazol were assessed in rats. Interictal spike frequency was reduced by 33% during 20 s of stimulation (p < 0.001) and remained low for ≤3 min. Amplitude of residual spikes was also decreased. Cardiac and respiratory rates were suppressed. Cooling the nerve proximal to the point of stimulation abolished the EEG and respiratory effects. A similar reduction in spike frequency of 39% was obtained by heating the animals' tail (p < 0.01). Vagal stimulation at onset of seizures reduced mean seizure duration from 30.2 ± 15.7 s without stimulation to 5.0 ± 1.8 s (p < 0.01). Only the EEG equivalent of the clonic phase of the seizure was affected. These findings suggest that vagus nerve stimulation can be a potent but nonspecific method to reduce cortical epileptiform activity, probably through an indirect effect mediated by the reticular activating system.     

Modulation of seizure threshold by vagus nerve stimulation in an animal model for motor seizures

De Herdt V, De Waele J, Raedt R, Wyckhuys T, El Tahry R, Vonck K, Wadman W, Boon P. Modulation of seizure threshold by vagus nerve stimulation in an animal model for motor seizures.
Acta Neurol Scand: 2010: 121: 271–276.
© 2009 The Authors Journal compilation © 2009 Blackwell Munksgaard. Objective – The precise mechanism of action of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) in suppressing epileptic seizures remains to be elucidated. This study investigates whether VNS modulates cortical excitability by determining the threshold for provoking focal motor seizures by cortical electrical stimulation before and after VNS. Material and methods – Male Wistar rats (n = 8) were implanted with a cuff‐electrode around the left vagus nerve and with stimulation electrodes placed bilaterally on the rat motor cortex. Motor seizure threshold (MST) was assessed for each rat before and immediately after 1 h of VNS with standard stimulation parameters, during two to three sessions on different days. Results – An overall significant increase of the MST was observed following 1 h of VNS compared to the baseline value (1420 μA and 1072 μA, respectively; P < 0.01). The effect was reproducible over time with an increase in MST in each experimental session. Conclusions – VNS significantly increases the MST in a cortical stimulation model for motor seizures. These data indicate that VNS is capable of modulating cortical excitability.     

Right-sided vagus nerve stimulation reduces generalized seizure severity in rats as effectively as left-sided

As currently utilized, vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is applied to the cervical trunk of the left vagus nerve to suppress seizures clinically. Demonstration that VNS can also reduce seizure severity when electrodes are placed on the right cervical vagus nerve in rats would provide empirical evidence that the antiepileptic effects of VNS are not an exclusive property of the left vagus nerve. Rats were implanted with a custom cuff electrode on either the left or right cervical vagus nerve. Two days later, continuous VNS was begun in half the rats with left-sided and half with right-sided electrodes. The remaining rats were connected to the stimulator, but did not receive VNS. After 30s, pentylenetetrazole (PTZ) was administered systemically and seizures were rated by a blinded observer. The PTZ test was repeated two days later, with VNS administered to the previously unstimulated rats, while the others received no stimulation. VNS significantly reduced the severity of PTZ-induced seizures in rats regardless of the side of stimulation as compared to their no-VNS (control condition) seizure severity. No significant differences in efficacy existed based on the side of stimulation. These results indicate that right-sided VNS in rats is just as effective as left-sided VNS, suggesting that fibers necessary for seizure suppression are not unique to the left vagus nerve.     

The role of locus coeruleus in the antiepileptic activity induced by vagus nerve stimulation

Stimulation of the vagus nerve produces antiepileptic effects. This is used clinically to treat drug-refractory epilepsies. The mechanisms responsible for these effects depend on the activation of vagal afferents reaching the nucleus of the solitary tract. This review focuses on the neuroanatomy of the nucleus of the solitary tract and its relation with the nucleus locus coeruleus as a preferential anatomical substrate in producing antiepileptic effects. In fact, following the transient or permanent inactivation of locus coeruleus neurons, some antiepileptic effects of vagus nerve stimulation are lost. The activation of locus coeruleus per se is known to limit the spread of a seizure and the duration of a variety of seizure types. This is due to the fine chemical neuroanatomy of norepinephrine pathways that arise from the locus coeruleus, which produce widespread changes in cortical areas. These changes may be sustained by norepinephrine alone, or in combination with its co-transmitters. In addition, vagus nerve stimulation may prevent seizures by activating the serotonin-containing dorsal raphe neurons.     

Vagus Nerve Stimulation Induces a Sustained Anticonvulsant Effect

Summary: Purpose: Stimulation of the vagus nerve can effectively abort several types of experimentally induced seizures in animals when administered near the time of seizure onset. Indirect evidence from human trials and animal studies suggests that the anticonvulsant effects of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) extend beyond the duration of stimulation. We used the pentylenetetrazol model to determine whether VNS exerts a persistent anticonvulsant effect.
Methods: VNS (1 mA, 30 Hz, 500 μs pulse width) was administered continuously for 0, 1, or 60 min, or intermittently (30 s on, 5 min off) for 60 min, to awake and freely moving animals. After the end of stimulation, pentylenetetrazol (50 mg/kg i.p.) was administered to induce seizures. Time-course studies were also performed, consisting of 60 min of VNS followed by pentylenetetrazol injection after 0, 3-, 5-, and 10-min intervals.
Results: The greatest anticonvulsant effect occurred after 60 min of continuous VNS, which prevented convulsions in four of 12 rats and reduced significantly seizure duration, the total number of seizures, and number of tonic seizures. Intermittent VNS was less effective than continuous stimulation for 60 min, but more effective than that for 1 min. The anticonvulsant effect declined in a time-dependent fashion after discontinuation of VNS, with return to nonstimulated control values by 10 min.
Conclusions: The results of this study verify a persistent VNS-induced anticonvulsant effect and indicate that its efficacy is dependent on the cumulative stimulus duration.     

Human vagus nerve electrophysiology: a guide to vagus nerve stimulation parameters.

The authors studied human vagus nerve electrophysiology intraoperatively on 21 patients (age range: 4 to 31 years) during implantation of a vagus nerve stimulator for seizure control. The study was performed with direct electrical stimulation of the vagus nerve with various stimulation parameters resembling those employed by the Cyberonics NeuroCybernetic Prosthesis System (Houston, TX), which is used clinically for vagus nerve stimulation for treatment of seizures. Recordings were made directly from the rostral end of the vagus nerve. The response of the vagus nerve to various stimulus parameters in patients of different ages was studied. Based on the vagus nerve characteristics, age-related adjustments for stimulus parameters were recommended.     

Severe new seizures after initiation of vagus nerve stimulation therapy

Vagus nerve stimulation is considered to be a safe and effective adjunctive therapy for patients with drug-resistant epilepsy. Contrary to some antiepileptic drugs, vagus nerve stimulation is not known to precipitate or aggravate new or preexisting seizures. We describe the emergence of a new type of disabling, recurrent partial seizure immediately after initiation of vagus nerve stimulation in a 51-year-old man with a known history of refractory partial epilepsy. Discontinuation of vagus nerve stimulation therapy and multiple antiepileptic drug interventions were required to abort these unexpected new seizures. We conclude that vagus nerve stimulation may induce paradoxical seizures, similarly to some antiepileptic drugs.     

Vagus nerve stimulation treatment for Lennox-Gastaut syndrome

Lennox-Gastaut syndrome is a severe age-specific epilepsy syndrome that presents with medication-resistant seizures in childhood. Antiepileptic drugs are the mainstay of treatment. Nonpharmacologic treatments include corpus callosum section and the ketogenic diet. However, no single treatment is safe and effective. We treated 13 patients with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome between the ages of 4 and 44 years (mean, 16.7 years) with vagus nerve stimulation. During the first 6 months of treatment, vagus nerve stimulation produced a median seizure rate reduction of 52% (range, 0% to 93%; P = .04). At 6 months of follow-up, three patients had a greater than 90% reduction in seizures, two had a greater than 75% reduction, one had a greater than 50% reduction, and six had at least a 25% reduction. One patient did not improve. No patient worsened after initial improvement. Side effects, including hoarseness, coughing, and pain in the throat, were transient and tolerable. No patient discontinued vagus nerve stimulation. Our results suggest that vagus nerve stimulation could be an effective and safe adjunct therapy for the treatment of Lennox-Gastaut syndrome.     

Evaluation of refractory epilepsy treated with vagus nerve stimulation for up to 5 years

We assessed the long-term efficacy of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) in 64 refractory epilepsy patients. After implantation, intermittent stimulation was delivered and seizure frequency and severity were counted. Average treatment time was 20 months. Nineteen of 47 patients with partial seizures, five of nine patients with idiopathic generalized seizures, and five of eight patients with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome had >50% seizure reduction. Side effects were mild. VNS is a safe and effective treatment for refractory epilepsy.     

Effects of vagus nerve stimulation on progressive myoclonus epilepsy of Unverricht-Lundborg type

PURPOSE: A 34-year-old woman with progressive myoclonus epilepsy of Unverricht-Lundborg type was considered for vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) therapy. METHODS: After demonstration of intractability to multiple antiepileptic regimens and progressive deterioration in cerebellar function, the patient was implanted with a vagus nerve stimulator and followed for 1 year. Neurological status, seizure frequency, and parameter changes were analyzed. RESULTS: VNS therapy resulted in reduction of seizures (more than 90%) and a significant improvement in cerebellar function demonstrated on neurological examination. The patient reported improved quality of life based in part on her ability to perform activities of daily living. CONCLUSIONS: VNS therapy may be considered a treatment option for progressive myoclonus epilepsy. The effects of VNS on seizure control and cerebellar dysfunction may provide clues to the underlying mechanism(s) of action.     

Invasive Neurostimulation in der Epilepsietherapie

Neurostimulation techniques are applied to reduce the frequency and severity of epileptic seizures. Class I evidence showed that vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) reduces seizure burden by 25-28% compared to 6-15% in placebo controls. Open-label studies, however, reported much greater efficacy. Since 2010 deep brain stimulation of the anterior nucleus of the thalamus (ANT-DBS) is CE approved for epilepsy therapy in Europe. A multicenter randomized controlled trial reported seizure frequency reduction by 40.4% compared to 14.5% in controls. A significant effect was only found in patients with temporal seizure onset. 13% of stimulated patients became seizure-free for at least 6 months. Possible side-effects include depression (14.8%) and memory impairment (13%). Responsive neurostimulation (RNS) combines an automated seizure detection device with on-demand triggered stimulation of the epileptogenic zone. A randomized controlled trial reported seizure frequency reduction by 37.9% compared to 17.3% in controls. There were no relevant neuropsychological or psychiatric side-effects noted.     

Vagus Nerve Stimulation in Humans: Neurophysiological Studies and Electrophysiological Monitoring

Summary: Evidence from studies of experimental animals indicates that electrical stimulation of the vagus nerve alters behavioral and electrographic seizure activity. We report on effects of electrical stimulation of the vagus nerve in five patients with medically intractable seizures as part of a clinical trial of chronic vagal stimulation for control of epilepsy. The mechanism of action of the vagal antiepileptic effect is unknown, and it is hoped that analysis of electrophysiological effects of vagal nerve stimulation will help elucidate which brain areas are affected. Stimulation of the left vagus nerve in the neck was accomplished with a programmable implanted stimulator. Effects of stimulus amplitude, duration, and rate were studied. Noncephalic reference recording of the vagus-nerve-evoked potential showed some unusual properties: a scalp negative component occurred with latency of 12 ms, very high amplitude (up to 60 μV), and widespread scalp distribution. Field distribution studies indicate that this potential is generated in the neck, in the region of the stimulating electrodes. Muscle paralysis confirms this observation. Stimulation at various frequencies had no noticeable effect on electroencephalographic (EEG) activity regardless of whether the patient was under general anesthesia, awake, or asleep.     

Right-sided vagus nerve stimulation as a treatment for refractory epilepsy in humans

PURPOSE: We present three children who underwent right-sided vagus nerve stimulation (R-VNS). This treatment option for people with refractory epilepsy has not been described in children. METHODS: We reviewed our database of >350 patients implanted with vagus nerve stimulators and now describe our experience in three patients with R-VNS for the treatment of intractable seizures. All three patients improved dramatically with left-sided vagus nerve stimulation (L-VNS), but the devices had to be removed because of infection. The patients were thought to be at high risk for nerve injury if they were reapproached for L-VNSs; therefore R-VNSs were implanted. RESULTS: All three patients with an R-VNS had a reduction in seizures. Our first patient has had an R-VNS for 5 years; he has been seizure free for >2 years on R-VNS monotherapy. The second patient had an R-VNS for 8 months. His seizure control improved slightly, but not as dramatically as with L-VNS. The third child has had an R-VNS for >7 months and has cessation of his most disabling seizure type (generalized tonic-clonic seizures). None of the patients had cardiac side effects from therapeutic R-VNS. However, two of the three patients had respiratory events with R-VNS. CONCLUSIONS: VNS is known to be an effective treatment in pharmacoresistant epilepsy. R-VNS should be considered if a patient has significant benefit from L-VNS but is unable to continue with L-VNS. R-VNS appears also to have antiepilepsy effects. Additionally, our case report suggests that in some patients, a differential response is found regarding seizure control with R-VNS or L-VNS, raising the question whether L-VNS failures should pursue a trial of R-VNS. Patients should be cautioned and monitored for reactive airway disease if they undergo R-VNS. More research is needed to compare the effects of right- and left-sided VNS on cardiac and pulmonary function in humans and to determine which has the best antiseizure effect.     

Long-term vagus nerve stimulation in the treatment of Lennox–Gastaut syndrome

The long-term effects of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) on seizure frequency were studied in 30 patients with Lennox–Gastaut syndrome. Median observation time was 52 months (17–123). The effect parameters investigated were total number of seizures and different seizure types. The median reduction in number of seizures was 60.6%. The effects of VNS varied considerably between seizure types. Best effects were observed with atonic seizures (80.8% median reduction, number of responders: 8/12), followed closely by tonic seizures (73.3% median reduction, number of responders: 8/13). Least effects were with generalized tonic–clonic seizures (median reduction 57.4%, number of responders: 11/20). Additional positive effects included milder or shorter ictal or postictal phase in 16 patients. Improved alertness was reported in 76.7%. Adverse effects, of which drooling and voice alteration were most frequent, were reported in 20 patients. There was a statistically significant reduction in the median number of antiepileptic drugs used. The discontinuation rate was 16.7%.     

Vagus nerve stimulation: clinical experience in a large patient series.

During the last decade, intermittent electrical stimulation of the left cervical vagus nerve was established as a new add-on treatment of drug-resistant seizures. Particularly in Europe, the acceptance of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) was tentative in the beginning because of unknown mechanisms of action. We report the outcome in a sample of 95 adult patients with drug-resistant seizures who have received implants since 1998. The last available follow-up data are included. Unavoidable medication changes (e.g., intoxication) were accepted to examine VNS under usual clinical conditions. Median percentage of reduction in seizure frequency as compared to baseline was 30%. The seizure responder rate (> or =50% reduction) was 45%. Four patients experienced total release from seizures. Adverse effects were mild in general. Seizure outcome was positively correlated with VNS duration. No potential clinical factor (e.g., syndrome, cause, or lesion) could be identified as an indicator of favorable outcome. Patients with on stimulation-on periods of 30 seconds (standard cycle) had a better outcome than patients with stimulation-on periods of 7 seconds (rapid cycle). During an embedded, randomized, controlled trial, no evidence was found for a differential outcome of initial standard cycle versus initial rapid cycle stimulation conditions. Taking into account the good cost-benefit ratio as well as positive effects on well-being, VNS has to be considered an appropriate strategy for the add-on treatment of drug-resistant seizures, particularly in cases not suitable for epilepsy surgery.     

Can natural ways to stimulate the vagus nerve improve seizure control?

The vagus nerve (VN) is the longest cranial nerve, innervating the neck, thorax and abdomen, with afferent fibers transmitting a range of interoceptive stimuli and efferent fibres to somatic structures and autonomic preganglions. Over the last few decades, electrical stimulation of the VN using implanted devices (VNS) has been developed leading to its approval for the treatment of epilepsy and depression. More recently, non-invasive devices to stimulation the VN have been developed. The VN has many functions and the activity that is most amenable to assessment is its effect in controlling the cardiac rhythm. This can be easily assessed by measuring heart rate variability (HRV). Decreased HRV is a result of poorer vagal parasympathetic tone and is associated with a wide range of ill health conditions including a higher risk of early mortality. People with epilepsy, particularly those with poorly controlled seizures, have been shown to have impaired parasympathetic tone. So, might natural ways to stimulate the VN, shown to improve parasympathetic tone as indicated by increased HRV, improve seizure control? There are numerous natural ways that have been shown to stimulate the VN, improving HRV and hence parasympathetic tone. These natural ways fall mainly into 3 categories – stress reduction, exercise, and nutrition. Though the natural ways to stimulate the VN have been shown to increase HRV, they have not been shown to reduce seizures. The exception is listening to Mozart's music, which has been shown to increase parasympathetic tone and decrease seizures. Clearly much more work is required to examine the effect of the various ways to increase HRV on seizure occurrence.     

VNS in patients with previous unsuccessful resective epilepsy surgery: antiepileptic and psychotropic effects

OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) in patients with medically and surgically intractable complex partial seizures (CPS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixteen patients with previous temporal [15] and frontal [one] resections were treated with VNS between 1994 and 1999 at King's College Hospital, London, UK. Post-operative video-electroencephalogram telemetry had shown that CPS started from the operated side in 12 patients, contralaterally in three and bilaterally independently in one. RESULTS: Three patients (18.75%) had 50% or more reduction in seizure frequency, but one showed severe worsening of epilepsy, which remitted upon VNS discontinuation. The antiepileptic effect of VNS was not different with respect to the type of operation (anterior temporal lobectomy vs amygdalohippocampectomy), the side of operation, or the side of seizure onset. We observed psychotropic effects in two patients with post-ictal psychosis, in two others with depression, and in a child with severe behavioral disorder. CONCLUSIONS: VNS may have a rather limited antiepileptic role to play in patients with persistent seizures following epilepsy surgery, but may independently possess useful antipsychotic and mood-stabilizing properties.     

Inhibition of Experimental Seizures in Canines by Repetitive Vagal Stimulation

Repetitive electrical stimulation of the canine cervical vagus nerve interrupts or abolishes motor seizures induced by strychnine and tremors induced by pentylenetetrazol (PTZ). Tremors were defined as rhythmic alternating contractions of opposing muscle groups, exerting much less force than seizure contractions. Seizures were induced by injection boluses of strychnine or PTZ at 1- to 4-min intervals until sustained muscle activity was observed electromyographically (EMG). Vagal stimulation terminated seizures in 0.5-5 s. There were prolonged periods with no spontaneous EMG activity after stimulation. The period of protection was approximately four times the stimulation period. The antiseizure actions of vagal stimulation were not altered by transection of the vagus distal to the stimulating electrode. Optimal stimulus parameters were estimated: strength, approximately 20 V (electrode resistance 1-5 omega); frequency 20-30 Hz; duration, approximately 0.2 ms. These data suggest that the antiseizure effects derive from stimulation of small-diameter afferent unmyelinated fibers in the vagus nerve. These results may form the basis of a new therapeutic approach to epilepsy.     

Left vagus nerve stimulation with the neurocybernetic prosthesis has complex effects on heart rate and on its variability in humans

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine if stimulation of the left vagus nerve (LVNS) with the neurocybernetic prosthesis (NCP) in humans is, as claimed in the literature, without cardiac chronotropic actions. METHODS: We analyzed 228 h of ECG recorded from five subjects with intractable epilepsy who had not benefited from LVNS, for effects on instantaneous heart rate (IHR) and heart rate variability (HRV). RESULTS: There were two main cardiac responses: (a) bradycardia, and (b) tachycardia during the first half, followed by bradycardia during the second half of stimulation (biphasic response). Multiphasic responses characterized by alternating bradycardia and tachycardia were rarely observed. HRV was either increased or decreased depending on the subject and on the stimulation parameters. HRV as a function of HR also showed high interindividual variability, and interestingly, in one case behaved paradoxically, increasing at higher and decreasing at lower heart rates. CONCLUSIONS: LVNS at high intensities has complex effects on IHR and HRV, which show large interindividual variability. These spectra of cardiac responses reflect the interplay of autonomic, visceral, and somatic sensory afferences and the role of central structures in their integration. These findings also point to the need for more comprehensive studies of cardiac function in humans implanted with the NCP, using sensitive methods for data processing and analysis such as those developed for this study.     

Transkutane Vagusnervstimulation bei einem Kind mit Dravet-Syndrom

Vagus nerve stimulation has become established as an effective and safe adjuvant therapy for drug-resistant epilepsy. In addition to invasive vagus nerve stimulation (i-VNS), transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (t-VNS) is also now available, where electrical pulses are generated by a stimulator unit connected to a special ear electrode. This article reports the case of an 11-year-old girl with Dravet syndrome. A therapy trial with t-VNS together with a combination therapy of zonisamide and phenobarbital was performed. The existing medication was maintained. The NEMOS® t-VNS device developed by the company Cerbomed was used. The child tolerated t-VNS well and for the most part the planned daily 4 h stimulation times were complied with. After 4 months, without changing the drug regimen, a 57?% reduction in seizure frequency (specifically from 30 to 13 seizures per month) was noted. No side effects were observed.