汉语单字词音、义加工的脑激活模式

目的:研究汉字音、义加工的脑机制.方法:采用汉字单字词为实验材料,通过功能磁共振成像扫描执行语音和语义两种认知任务的脑区.结果:语音任务激活的脑区有,左侧顶叶下部和颞上回(BA 40/39/22,BA:Brodmann Area,即布鲁德曼分区,下同),左侧枕中回(BA 18/19),右侧枕下回(BA 18/19),以及左中央前回(BA6).语义任务激活的脑区有,左侧顶叶下部(BA 40/39)和左侧颞上回(BA 22),左侧额下回(BA 10/47),右侧额中回和额上回(BA 10/11),以及左侧额中回(BA 11).语义任务减去语音任务激活的脑区有,左侧额下回(BA47),左侧海马(BA 36)和右侧海马旁回(BA 36).语音任务减去语义任务没有发现任何脑区的显著激活.结论:在语义任务中与语音有关的脑区得到激活;而在语音任务中与语义有关的脑区没有激活.     

汉语语音加工的神经基础：图片刺激下的功能磁共振成像

对语音加工的研究使用文字刺激的较多。实验采用fMRI技术,使用图片刺激,在汉语押韵任务下,考察与汉语语音加工相关的脑区。对13名以汉语为母语的在校健康本科大学生的测试结果显示：图片刺激下汉语的语音加工会激活额叶、顶叶和枕颞联合皮质,包括额下回、额中回、缘上回、枕颞内侧回等。此外,图片刺激下汉语语音加工在颞上回BA22区引起了激活,但在颞中回未出现激活。     

首发精神分裂症患者倒背数字作业的fMEI研究

目的利用功能磁共振成像(fMRI)探讨首发精神分裂症患者倒背数字作业激发图像的特点.方法 36例符合ICD-10诊断标准的(首发)精神分裂症患者及18名健康志愿者进行以倒背数字作业(backward digit span task, BDST)作为刺激模式、采用组块(block)设计的fMRI检查,经工作站处理后获功能图像.用阳性和阴性症状量表(PANSS)评价精神分裂症患者精神症状的严重程度. 结果 (1)健康志愿者与精神分裂症患者激活脑区的范围均较广泛,健康志愿者的左侧额上回、双侧额中回、左侧额下回、左侧中央前回、左侧顶上小叶、左侧缘上回、左侧颞下回及左侧枕颞外侧回等脑区均有明显激活.两组激活的脑区在额叶、颞叶、顶叶、枕叶及扣带回的分布,以及各脑区内部分布的差异均没有显著性(P>0.05).(2)健康志愿者与精神分裂症患者激活计数左侧额上回分别为16和11,左侧额下回分别为15和12,左侧中央前回分别为16和17,左侧颞下回分别为14和12,左侧顶上小叶分别为14和14,左侧缘上回分别为14和7,左侧枕颞外侧回分别为14和7,右侧中央前回分别为13和7,右侧枕颞外侧回分别为11和8,两组上述部位激活计数的差异均有显著性(P均＜0.05).(3)健康志愿者与精神分裂症患者左侧额叶背外侧的激活平均体积分别为(362±296)个体素和(79±101)个体素,差异有非常显著性(P=0.001);右侧顶叶后下部的激活平均体积分别为(448±273)个体素和(193±236)个体素,差异有显著性(P=0.039). 结论早期精神分裂症患者可能存在工作记忆缺陷,包括激活信息的保持及执行控制过程,激活信息的保持缺陷可能与左侧额叶腹外侧及顶叶后下部的功能低下有关,而执行控制缺陷可能与左侧额叶背外侧的功能低下有关.     

~(18)F-FDG PET显像观察特发性快眼动睡眠期行为障碍患者脑葡萄糖代谢特点的研究

目的探讨~(18)F-FDG PET显像观察特发性快眼动睡眠期行为障碍(iRBD)患者脑葡萄糖代谢改变和iRBD脑葡萄糖代谢改变与病程间的相关性。方法纳入多导睡眠监测(PSG)确诊的iRBD患者20例(iRBD组)和年龄、性别匹配的健康对照者19例(对照组)。两组均行~(18)F-FDG PET脑显像。基于自动解剖标记模板将大脑划分为90个左右对称的脑区,计算各脑区葡萄糖代谢半定量值。对iRBD组和对照组各脑区葡萄糖代谢半定量值进行独立样本t检验;并对iRBD组脑葡萄糖代谢改变与病程行Pearson相关分析。结果 (1)与对照组比较,iRBD组的双侧背外侧额上回、双侧眶部额上回、双侧眶部额中回、双侧海马、双侧海马旁回、双侧杏仁核、左侧眶部额下回、左侧岛叶、左侧内侧与旁扣带脑回、左侧中央旁小叶、左侧苍白球的葡萄糖代谢半定量值均增高(P0.05);双侧距状裂周围皮质、双侧楔叶、双侧舌回、双侧枕上回、双侧枕中回、双侧枕下回、双侧角回、双侧颞上回、双侧颞中回、右侧颞横回的葡萄糖代谢半定量值均降低(P0.05)。Pearson相关分析结果,iRBD组双侧杏仁核、双侧颞上回、右侧楔叶、右侧枕上回、右侧颞横回、左侧海马、左侧颞中回的葡萄糖代谢半定量值与病程呈正相关(P0.05);而双侧眶部额上回、双侧眶部额中回、左侧中央旁小叶、左侧眶部额下回、左侧内侧和旁扣带回、右侧背外侧额上回、右侧海马旁回的葡萄糖代谢半定量值与病程呈负相关(P0.05)。结论 iRBD患者脑内存在疾病相关的葡萄糖代谢水平改变,有助于客观评估iRBD病情的变化。     

空间记忆广度的脑功能磁共振研究

目的本实验拟通过功能磁共振研究参与正常人空间记忆广度任务的脑功能区和特点。方法10名右利手健康志愿者进行一项空间记忆广度任务作业的同时进行脑功能磁共振扫描,实验采用组块设计,实验任务与对照任务交替进行,数据采用SPM99软件进行数据分析和脑功能区定位。结果当统计阈值设定为P(0.0001时,被试者的双侧Brodmann区(Brodmann area,BA)6区(额中下回)、右BA9区(额中下回)、左额下回BA47区、双侧顶叶BA7区(楔前叶、顶上小叶)、双侧顶叶BA40区(缘上回),右枕叶BA18、19区、右海马回BA30区、左枕颞交界处BA37区、双侧顶叶中央后回BA3区、左顶叶中央后回BA2区、右中央前回BA4区及左中脑黑质、右小脑均有激活,以顶叶的激活最为显著,其次为额叶、枕叶,其中额叶的BA9区和枕叶的BA18、19区及海马回、小脑的激活有极其明显的右侧半球优势;当统计阈值设定为P(0.001时,脑激活区增加了右前扣带回BA25区,右侧额下回BA47区、左额叶BA9区,左侧枕叶BA17、18、19区及右屏状核,左丘脑侧后核。结论与空间记忆广度有关的主要脑区有BA9、6、7、40、19区和海马回、小脑。它们在进行短时空间记忆任务时所起的作用不同。通过fMRI的研究,揭示了大脑进行空间信息的处理过程。     

健康人倒背数字作业的脑功能磁共振成像研究

目的　利用功能磁共振成像(functionalmagneticresonanceimaging ,fMRI)技术探讨倒背数字作业认知功能的脑功能定位。方法　1 8名健康志愿者完成以倒背数字作业(backwarddigitspantask ,BDST)作为刺激模式、采用组块设计(block)的fMRI检查,经工作站处理后获功能图像。结果　健康志愿者的左侧额上回、额中回、额下回、中央前回、顶上小叶、缘上回、颞下回、枕颞外侧回及右侧额中回等脑区均有明显激活。结论　左侧额叶腹外侧及左侧项叶后下部可能参与工作记忆对语言材料激活信息的保持,而双侧额叶背外侧可能参与工作记忆对语言材料激活信息的执行控制。     

矿难后急性重性创伤后应激障碍症状激发和创伤有关短期记忆提取的功能性磁共振成像研究

目的 探讨急性重性创伤后应激障碍(post traumatic stress disorder,PTSD)患者的脑功能及执行记忆功能时的脑反应.方法 采用功能磁共振成像技术,对经历矿难的10例急性重性PTSD患者(PTSD组)和7例非PTSD对照(非PTSD组)执行症状激发任务,并首次采用1项创伤有关的短期记忆提取任务进行记忆功能的测定.结果 症状激发试验中,PTSD组负性图片相比中性图片,左侧后扣带回、双侧尾状核和右侧丘脑等脑区激活增强,右侧扣带回和双侧额中回激活下降;PTSD组相比非PTSD组,右侧前扣带回、左侧额下回、双侧额中回及双侧颞中回等脑区激活下降,左侧海马旁回激活增高.短期记忆提取任务中,PTSD组负性图片相比中性图片,右侧后扣带回和双侧海马存在明显激活;PTSD组相比非PTSD组,右侧额下回、右侧额中回、左侧枕中回等脑区激活下降.记忆提取任务相比症状激发任务,PTSD组右侧海马旁回激活下降.结论 急性重性PTSD患者在急性期已存在部分脑区激活的下降以及记忆功能的减退.     

年轻人与老年人简单乘法运算之功能磁共振成像研究

目的应用fMRI技术探讨中国青年和老年人群在简单运算任务下脑激活模式及其与行为学之间的关系。方法分别对青年组(19例)和老年组(20例)健康志愿者进行对照任务和简单运算任务下的fMRI检查。结果两组受试者受教育程度(P=0.125)、智力水平(P=0.921),以及完成对照任务(P=0.142)和简单乘法运算任务(P=0.880)之正确率差异无统计学意义,但老年组受试者完成对照任务(P=0.000)和简单乘法运算任务(P=0.005)反应时间明显延长。青年组受试者在任务刺激下可激活右侧缘上回并向顶内沟和颞中上回后部延伸,中央前回和运动前区、前额叶,左侧缘上回并向颞上回后部和角回延伸,顶内沟区域、颞中下回,内侧后扣带回、楔前叶、辅助运动区、海马沟、海马旁回及前额叶内侧;老年组受试者则分别激活右侧缘上回和顶下区域并向颞中上回后部延伸,中央前回和运动前区、前额叶,左侧缘上回和角回并向顶下延伸,中央前回和运动前区、岛叶及前额叶,内侧后扣带回和中央旁小叶、前扣带回及前额叶内侧;两组受试者共激活脑区包括顶下区域、楔前叶、中央前后回和额顶叶网络,以及颞叶、海马旁回、钩回、屏状核和后扣带回等皮质下结构。结论数学事实提取相关网络的主要成分受年龄影响较小,老年人群的任务激活脑区主要向任务相关顶区集中。     

抑郁症患者对正性面部表情功能识别

目的：利用任务态功能核磁共振成像技术,初步探讨抗抑郁治疗对正性情绪识别脑区功能的影响。方法：检测19例抑郁症患者治疗前和治疗10周后在识别正性及中性面部表情视频时的激活脑区,并与19例匹配的健康者对照比较。结果：与正常对照组相比,治疗前抑郁症患者左右颞上回（BA39）、左后扣带回（BA23）、右后扣带回（BA30）、左丘脑、右岛叶（BA13）等脑区激活显著降低;治疗后患者左颞上回（BA39）、右颞上回（BA22）、左颞中回（BA37）、左右海马旁回（BA30）、右后扣带回（BA29）、右梭状回（BA36）、左额中回（BA8）、右额下回（BA47）、左顶下小叶（BA40）、右岛叶（BA13）等脑区激活较治疗前增强;但与正常组相比,左颞上回（BA22）、左额中回（BA10）、左梭状回（BA20）、左楔叶（BA19）、右顶上小叶（BA7）、右岛叶（BA13）等脑区激活仍存在一定程度的降低。结论：经抗抑郁治疗,抑郁症患者正性情绪识别脑区功能较治疗前有所改善,但与正常对照组相比,仍存在一定程度的功能损害。进一步证实了积极有效的抗抑郁治疗能够部分逆转正性情绪相关脑区损害。     

首次发病且未用药的成年早发和晚发抑郁症患者脑功能连接差异研究

目的比较成年早发抑郁症(EOD)和成年晚发抑郁症(LOD)患者默认网络(DMN)内部功能连接的差异,探究不同发病年龄的抑郁症患者是否有不同的发病机制。方法选取在昆明医科大学第一附属医院精神科门诊或住院的EOD患者(n=58)和LOD患者(n=62)为研究对象,同期招募年轻健康对照组(n=60)和年老健康对照组(n=52)。对受试者进行静息态功能磁共振扫描,选择左侧楔前叶为种子点,计算该种子点与全脑的功能连接,并比较各组间该种子点的功能连接差异。结果四组之间功能连接具有差异的脑区涉及双侧额叶、颞叶、基底节、枕叶、顶叶及小脑等脑区。EOD组左侧楔前叶与左侧小脑Crus1区、左侧小脑IX区、左侧颞中回、右侧楔前叶、右侧前扣带回、右侧额中回、右侧角回、右侧脑岛、右侧内侧额上回、右侧颞中回的功能连接均高于年轻健康对照组(Z=3. 752 4～5. 867 8,P均0. 05);而左侧楔前叶与左侧额中回、左侧中央旁小叶、右侧缘上回、右侧额上回、右侧颞下回、右侧中央后回、右侧中央前回、右侧枕上回的功能连接均低于年轻健康对照组(Z=-5. 007 6～-3. 797 7,P均0. 05)。LOD组左侧楔前叶与左侧小脑Crus2区、左侧尾状核、左侧颞下回、左侧小脑Crus1区、左侧角回、左侧额中回、右侧额中回、右侧角回、右侧眶额部额中回的功能连接均高于年老健康对照组(Z=4. 122 8～6. 579 4,P均0. 05);与左侧海马旁回、左侧额上回、右侧枕中回、右侧中央前回、右侧内侧额上回、右侧锯状回、右侧颞下回、右侧中央旁小叶、右侧梭状回、右侧后扣带回的功能连接均低于年老健康对照组(Z=-5. 884 0～-3. 617 2,P均0. 05)。EOD组左侧楔前叶与左侧锯状回、左侧小脑IV-VI区、左侧小脑Crus2区的功能连接比LOD组高(Z=4. 087 7、3. 937 4、3. 672 1,P均0. 05);EOD组左侧楔前叶与右侧额中回、右侧眶额部额下回、右侧额上回的功能连接比LOD组低(Z=-4. 274 8、-3. 956 8、-4. 724 3、-3. 663 2,P均0. 05)。结论 DMN内部功能连接增高及额顶网络功能连接降低可能与EOD的发病机制相关,而DMN前部功能连接增高和后部功能连接降低可能与LOD的发病机制相关,不同发病年龄的成年抑郁症患者可能有不同的发病机制。     

Specialization of phonological and semantic processing in Chinese word reading

The purpose of this study was to examine the neurocognitive network for processing visual word forms in native Chinese speakers using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). In order to compare the processing of phonological and semantic representations, we developed parallel rhyming and meaning association judgment tasks that required explicit access and manipulation of these representations. Subjects showed activation in left inferior/middle frontal gyri, bilateral medial frontal gyri, bilateral middle occipital/fusiform gyri, and bilateral cerebella for both the rhyming and meaning tasks. A direct comparison of the tasks revealed that the rhyming task showed more activation in the posterior dorsal region of the inferior/middle frontal gyrus (BA 9/44) and in the inferior parietal lobule (BA 40). The meaning task showed more activation in the anterior ventral region of the inferior/middle frontal gyrus (BA 47) and in the superior/middle temporal gyrus (BA 22,21). These findings are consistent with previous studies in English that suggest specialization of inferior frontal regions for the access and manipulation of phonological vs. semantic representations, but also suggest that this specialization extends to the middle frontal gyrus for Chinese. These findings are also consistent with the suggestion that the left middle temporal gyrus is involved in representing semantic information and the left inferior parietal lobule is involved in mapping between orthographic and phonological representations.     

Activation of right fronto-temporal cortex characterizes the 'living' category in semantic processing.

It is a vital ability for humans to distinguish between living and non-living objects. Whether the semantic features of these two classes of objects are represented in distinct brain areas, is unknown. In our study, words belonging to the categories 'living' and 'non-living' were presented visually to twelve right-handed volunteers, while brain activation was measured with event-related fMRI. Subjects had to judge whether the item belonged to one of these categories. Common areas of activation (P<0.05, corrected) during processing of both categories include the inferior occipital gyri bilaterally (BA 17/18), left inferior frontal gyrus (BA 44/45) and left inferior parietal lobe (BA 40). During processing of 'living' minus 'non-living' items, signal changes (P<0.05, corrected) were present in the the right inferior frontal (BA 47), middle temporal (BA 21) and fusiform gyrus (BA 19). Our results are in line with findings from patients with a deficit in semantic processing of living things, who specifically suffer from right hemispheric lesions.     

太溪和丘墟穴捻针时不同脑功能区的激活

A number of previous studies of acupuncture acupoint specificity have used sham acupoints,sham acupuncture or meridian acupoints at a great distance from each other as controls in functional MRI (fMRI) experiments.However,few studies have compared different meridian acupoints within the same segment,which are associated with similarly intense needle sensations.We performed fMRI on 12 healthy young volunteers and observed differences in brain activation elicited by acupuncture of the Taixi (KI 3) and Qiuxu (GB 40) acupoints.Acupuncture was applied at the Taixi and Qiuxu acupoints,using a multiple-block fMRI design with three blocks,involving three alternations of resting and task phases.After scanning,needle sensation was assessed.The behavioral results revealed that the subjective needle sensation was similar between the Taixi and Qiuxu acupoints.The fMRI results revealed that acupuncture at the right Taixi acupoint activated the right superior temporal gyrus (BA 22),left middle frontal gyrus (BA 46) and inferior frontal gyrus (BA 45),bilateral parietal lobe postcentral gyrus (BA 2),right parietal lobe (BA 3),and left parietal lobe (BA 40).Acupuncture at the right Qiuxu acupoint activated the left superior temporal gyrus (BA 42),right parietal lobe postcentral gyrus (BA 40,BA 43),right inferior frontal gyrus (BA 47),bilateral superior temporal gyrus (BA 22),and right insula BA13.These results suggest that the right Taixi and Qiuxu acupoints activated different brain areas.     

A procedure for identifying regions preferentially activated by attention to semantic and phonological relations using functional magnetic resonance imaging

A procedure is introduced for using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) techniques to identify neural regions associated with attention to semantic and phonological aspects of written words within a single group of subjects. Short lists (16 words/list), consisting of visually-presented semantically-related words (bed, rest) or rhyming words (weep, beep) were presented rapidly to subjects, who were asked to attend to the relations among the words. Regions preferentially involved in attention to semantic relations appeared within left anterior/ventral inferior frontal gyrus (IFG, approximate Brodmann Area, BA47), left posterior/dorsal IFG (BA44/45), left superior/middle temporal cortex (BA22/21), left fusiform gyrus (BA37), and right cerebellum. Regions preferentially involved in attention to phonological relations appeared within left inferior frontal cortex (near BA6/44, posterior to the semantic regions within IFG described above) and within bilateral inferior parietal cortex (BA40) and precuneus (BA7). This method is notable in that a comparison of the two tasks within some of the individual subjects revealed activation patterns similar to the group average, especially within left inferior frontal and left superior/middle parietal cortices. This fact combined with the efficiency with which the data can be obtained (here, in about an hour of functional scanning) and the adaptability of the task for many different subject populations suggests a wide range of possibilities for this technique: it could be used to track language development (e.g. in children), compare language organization across subject populations (e.g. for dyslexic or blind subjects), and identify language regions within individuals (e.g. potentially to aid in surgical planning).     

维吾尔语语义加工脑功能定位的磁共振成像研究

目的 利用功能磁共振(fMRI)技术研究维吾尔族对其母语(维吾尔文字)进行词义联想脑功能的激活区及语言的偏侧化.方法 29例健康志愿者作为受试对象,通过视觉刺激对每个单音节实词进行词义联想同时行fMRI,所有数据经神经功能分析软件对相关脑皮质激活区进行个体分析及组分析.结果 多个皮质出现激活区,主要出现在双侧额中回、额下回、枕中回、中央前回及梭状回,左侧颞中回、顶上下小叶、楔前叶,右侧颞上回、舌回.左侧大脑半球激活体积明显大于右侧.结论 多个脑功能区参与维吾尔语义加工,fMRI能够很好地发现这些功能区,维吾尔族语言优势半球为左侧大脑半球.     

Neuroanatomical correlates of phonological processing of Chinese characters and alphabetic words: a meta-analysis

We used the activation likelihood estimation (ALE) method to quantitatively synthesize data from 19 published brain mapping studies of phonological processing in reading, six with Chinese and 13 with alphabetic languages. It demonstrated high concordance of cortical activity across multiple studies in each written language system as well as significant differences of activation likelihood between languages. Four neural systems for the phonological processing of Chinese characters included: (1) a left dorsal lateral frontal system at Brodmann area (BA) 9; (2) the dorsal aspect of left inferior parietal system; (3) a bilateral ventral-occipitotemporal system including portions of fusiform gyrus and middle occipital gyrus; and (4) a left ventral prefrontal system covering the superior aspect of inferior frontal gyrus. For phonological processing of written alphabetic words, cortical areas identified here are consistent with the three neural systems proposed previously in the literature: (1) a ventral prefrontal system involving superior portions of left inferior frontal gyrus; (2) a left dorsal temporoparietal system including mid-superior temporal gyri and the ventral aspect of inferior parietal cortex (supramarginal region); and (3) a left ventral occipitotemporal system. Contributions of each of these systems to phonological processing in reading were discussed, and a covariant learning hypothesis is offered to account for the findings that left middle frontal gyrus is responsible for addressed phonology in Chinese whereas left temporoparietal regions mediate assembled phonology in alphabetic languages. Language form, cognitive process, and learning strategy drive the development of functional neuroanatomy.     

Different patterns and development characteristics of processing written logographic characters and alphabetic words: An ALE meta‐analysis

The neural systems for phonological processing of written language have been well identified now, while models based on these neural systems are different for different language systems or age groups. Although each of such models is mostly concordant across different experiments, the results are sensitive to the experiment design and intersubject variability. Activation likelihood estimation (ALE) meta‐analysis can quantitatively synthesize the data from multiple studies and minimize the interstudy or intersubject differences. In this study, we performed two ALE meta‐analysis experiments: one was to examine the neural activation patterns of the phonological processing of two different types of written languages and the other was to examine the development characteristics of such neural activation patterns based on both alphabetic language and logographic language data. The results of our first meta‐analysis experiment were consistent with the meta‐analysis which was based on the studies published before 2005. And there were new findings in our second meta‐analysis experiment, where both adults and children groups showed great activation in the left frontal lobe, the left superior/middle temporal gyrus, and the bilateral middle/superior occipital gyrus. However, the activation of the left middle/inferior frontal gyrus was found increase with the development, and the activation was found decrease in the following areas: the right claustrum and inferior frontal gyrus, the left inferior/medial frontal gyrus, the left middle/superior temporal gyrus, the right cerebellum, and the bilateral fusiform gyrus. It seems that adults involve more phonological areas, whereas children involve more orthographic areas and semantic areas. Hum Brain Mapp 35:2607–2618, 2014. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc .     

The hippocampal system mediates logical reasoning about familiar spatial environments

It has recently been shown that syllogistic reasoning engages two dissociable neural systems. Reasoning about familiar situations engages a frontal-temporal lobe system, whereas formally identical reasoning tasks involving unfamiliar situations recruit a frontal-parietal visuospatial network. These two systems may correspond to the "heuristic" and "formal" methods, respectively, postulated by cognitive theory. To determine if this dissociation generalizes to reasoning about transitive spatial relations, we studied 14 volunteers using event-related fMRI, as they reasoned about landmarks in familiar and unfamiliar environments. Our main finding is a task (reasoning and baseline) by spatial content (familiar and unfamiliar) interaction. Modulation of reasoning toward unfamiliar landmarks resulted in bilateral activation of superior and inferior parietal lobules (BA 7, 40), dorsal superior frontal cortex (BA 6), and right superior and middle frontal gyri (BA 8), regions widely implicated in visuospatial processing. By contrast, modulation of the reasoning task toward familiar landmarks, engaged the right inferior/orbital frontal gyrus (BA 11/47), bilateral occipital (BA 18, 19), and temporal lobes. The temporal lobe activation included the right inferior temporal gyrus (BA 37), posterior hippocampus, and parahippocampal gyrus, regions implicated in spatial memory and navigation tasks. These results provide support for the generalization of dual mechanism theory to transitive reasoning and highlight the importance of the hippocampal system in reasoning about familiar spatial environments.     

Compensatory brain activation in children with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder during a simplified Go/No-go task

Given that a number of recent studies have shown attenuated brain activation in prefrontal regions in children with ADHD, it has been recognized as a disorder in executive function. However, fewer studies have focused exclusively on the compensatory brain activation in ADHD. The present study objective was to investigate the compensatory brain activation patterns during response inhibition (RI) processing in ADHD children. In this study, 15 ADHD children and 15 sex-, age-, and IQ-matched control children were scanned with a 3-T MRI equipment while performing a simplified letter Go/No-go task. The results showed more brain activation in the ADHD group compared with the control group, whereas the accuracy and reaction time of behavioral performance were the same. Children with ADHD did not activate the normal RI brain circuits, which are thought to be predominantly located in the right middle/inferior frontal gyrus (BA46/44), right inferior parietal regions (BA40), and pre-SMA(BA6), but instead, activated brain regions, such as the left inferior frontal cortex, the right inferior temporal cortex, the right precentral gyrus, the left postcentral gyrus, the inferior occipital cortex, the middle occipital cortex, the right calcarine, the right hippocampus, the right midbrain, and the cerebellum. Our conclusion is that children with ADHD tend to compensatorily use more posterior and diffusive brain regions to sustain normal RI function.