首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
相似文献
 共查询到10条相似文献,搜索用时 140 毫秒
1.
We studied patients with cervical dystonia (CD) to determine clinical features and response to botulinum toxin A (BoNT/A). Patients were submitted to clinical, laboratory and neuroimaging evaluation. BoNT/A was injected locally in 81 patients using electromyographic guidance. Four patients who had had previous treatment were considered to be in remission. The average ages at onset of focal dystonia and segmental dystonia were greater than for generalized dystonia (p<0.0003). The severity of the abnormal head-neck movements were more severe among the patients with generalized dystonia (p<0.001). Pain in the cervical area was noted in 59 patients. It was not possible to determine the etiology of the disease in 62.3% of patients. Tardive dystonia was the most common secondary etiology. A major improvement in the motor symptoms of CD and pain was observed in patients following treatment with BoNT/A. The tardive dystonia subgroup did not respond to the treatment. Dysphagia was observed in 2.35% of the patients.  相似文献   

2.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the safety and efficacy of botulinum toxin type B (BoNT/B) in patients with type A-resistant cervical dystonia (CD). Background: Local intramuscular injections of BoNT are an effective therapy for CD. After repeated use, some patients become resistant to therapy. BoNT/B, effective in type A toxin-responsive patients, is proposed as an alternative therapy for type A-resistant patients. METHODS: The authors performed a 16-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of BoNT/B in type A-resistant patients with CD. After resistance to therapy was confirmed with the frontalis-type A test, placebo or 10,000 U BoNT/B was administered in a single session into two to four clinically involved muscles. The Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) was the primary efficacy measurement. TWSTRS-Total, three visual analog scales (Patient Global Assessment of Change, Principal Investigator Global Assessment of Change, Patient Analog Pain Assessment), and adverse events were assessed at baseline and weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16. RESULTS: A total of 77 patients participated (38 placebo, 39 active). Improvements in severity, disability, and pain were documented in the BoNT/B-treated group. TWSTRS-Total scores were improved in the BoNT/B-treated group at weeks 4 (p = 0.0001), 8 (p = 0.0002), and 12 (p = 0.0129). All three visual analog scales demonstrated improvements at week 4 (p < 0.0001, 0.0001, and 0.001). A Kaplan-Meier analysis supported a duration of effect of 12 to 16 weeks in the active group. Dry mouth and dysphagia were self-limited adverse effects, reported more commonly in the BoNT/B group. CONCLUSIONS: Botulinum toxin type B (BoNT/B) (NeuroBloc) is safe and efficacious for the management of patients with type A-resistant cervical dystonia with an estimated duration of treatment effect of 12 to 16 weeks.  相似文献   

3.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the safety and efficacy of botulinum toxin type B (BoNT/B) in patients with cervical dystonia (CD). BACKGROUND: BoNT/B is a form of chemodenervation therapy for the treatment of patients with CD. METHODS: The authors performed a 16-week, randomized, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of BoNT/B in patients with CD who continue to respond to botulinum toxin type A. Placebo, or 5,000 U or 10,000 U of BoNT/B was administered in two to four muscles involved clinically in CD. The Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS)-Total score at week 4 was the primary efficacy measure. Clinical assessments and adverse events were recorded for treatment day 1 and at weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16. RESULTS: A total of 109 patients were enrolled randomly across all three treatment groups. The mean improvement in the TWSTRS-Total scores in each group at week 4 was 4.3 (placebo), 9.3 (5,000 U), and 11.7 (10,000 U). For the prospectively defined primary contrast (10,000 U versus placebo), highly significant differences were noted for the primary (TWSTRS-Total, baseline to week 4, p = 0.0004) and supportive secondary (Patient Global Assessment, baseline to week 4, p = 0.0001) outcome measures. Improvement in pain, disability, and severity of CD occurred for patients who were treated with BoNT/B when compared with placebo-treated patients. Overall, improvements associated with BoNT/B treatment were greatest for patients who received the 10,000-U dose. The duration of treatment effect for BoNT/B was 12 to 16 weeks for both doses. CONCLUSION: Botulinum toxin type B (NeuroBloc) is safe and efficacious at 5,000 U and 10,000 U for the management of patients with cervical dystonia.  相似文献   

4.
OBJECTIVES: The advent of botulinum neurotoxin type A (BoNT/A) gave rise to substantial progress in the treatment of focal dystonias. In the light of the high costs of the toxin and the necessity to establish valid outcome indices for this treatment apart from sheer reduction of dystonic muscle tone and posture, the impact of focal dystonia and its treatment with BoNT/A on patients' health related quality of life (HRQL) was determined. METHODS: Fifty patients with cranial and cervical dystonia treated long term with BoNT/A were enrolled in a prospective, open labelled cohort study. The HRQL was assessed using the EuroQol (EQ-5D) and the short form 36 health survey questionnaire (SF-36) at baseline before BoNT/A injections and at two follow up visits after 6 and 12 weeks covering one BoNT/A treatment period with maximum effect size at the first follow up. RESULTS: Compared with a general population sample, a considerable negative impact of focal dystonia on HRQL was found in patients under investigation. In both disease types, BoNT/A treatment led to a significant improvement in several HRQL dimensions, in particular providing moderate to marked effect sizes in the fields of mental health and pain. The impairment of HRQL due to pain as well as the BoNT/A induced improvement within this SF-36 subscore were significantly higher in patients with cervical dystonia. Under BoNT/A therapy, no correlation was found between changes of clinical outcome scores and HRQL measures. CONCLUSIONS: The data confirm that BoNT/A is able to induce a significant, but temporary amelioration of several aspects of HRQL in both types of focal dystonia. This may substantially contribute to the patients' subjective benefit from the therapy. Moreover, the data provide further arguments to accept high costs of the BoNT/A treatment in these severely handicapped patients, as a consequence of its considerable benefit on quality of life.  相似文献   

5.
Objectives: To provide a revised version of earlier guidelines published in 2006. Background: Primary dystonias are chronic and often disabling conditions with a widespread spectrum mainly in young people. Diagnosis: Primary dystonias are classified as pure dystonia, dystonia plus or paroxysmal dystonia syndromes. Assessment should be performed using a validated rating scale for dystonia. Genetic testing may be performed after establishing the clinical diagnosis. DYT1 testing is recommended for patients with primary dystonia with limb onset before age 30, and in those with an affected relative with early‐onset dystonia. DYT6 testing is recommended in early‐onset or familial cases with cranio‐cervical dystonia or after exclusion of DYT1. Individuals with early‐onset myoclonus should be tested for mutations in the DYT11 gene. If direct sequencing of the DYT11 gene is negative, additional gene dosage is required to improve the proportion of mutations detected. A levodopa trial is warranted in every patient with early‐onset primary dystonia without an alternative diagnosis. In patients with idiopathic dystonia, neurophysiological tests can help with describing the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying the disorder. Treatment: Botulinum toxin (BoNT) type A is the first‐line treatment for primary cranial (excluding oromandibular) or cervical dystonia; it is also effective on writing dystonia. BoNT/B is not inferior to BoNT/A in cervical dystonia. Pallidal deep brain stimulation (DBS) is considered a good option, particularly for primary generalized or cervical dystonia, after medication or BoNT have failed. DBS is less effective in secondary dystonia. This treatment requires a specialized expertise and a multidisciplinary team.  相似文献   

6.
Neutralization of antibodies poses a problem for a substantial number of cervical dystonia (CD) patients treated with botulinum toxin type A (BoNT/A). Presence of these antibodies may lead to a secondary nonresponse to BoNT/A treatment. In this study, we compared 6 antibody-positive (Ab+) with 12 antibody- negative (Ab-) CD patients treated with BoNT/A (Dysport) and matched for du- ration of treatment, number of BoNT/A injections, and severity of clinical symptoms. The two groups differed in cumulative BoNT/A dose (Ab+, 5984 mouse units [MU ], SD = 3151 MU; Ab-, 3143 MU, SD =1294 MU; P <.05), in addition, ab+ patients were significantly younger (ab+ mean age = 41.3 y, sd =5.9 y; ab - mean age = 56.8 y, sd = 15.3 y; p <.05), in or- der to avoid formation of neutralizing antibodies, doses of bont/a should be kept as low as possible, the risk of antibody formation seems to be higher in younger patients.  相似文献   

7.
The objective was to evaluate whether removal of neutralisingantibodies potentially resensitises a secondary non-responder tobotulinum neurotoxin A (BoNT/A). Neutralising antibodies directed against BoNT/A are produced during long term treatment withBoNT/A-hemagglutinin complex in up to 10% of patients with cervicaldystonia. These patients become secondary non-responders. Otherserotypes of BoNT are not yet generally available and may also bear therisk of inducing antibody formation. Plasma exchange (PE) (onetreatment cycle) and immunoadsorption on a protein A column (IA-PA;three treatment cycles) was employed over 15 months to removeneutralising antibodies from a severely disabled secondarynon-responder with cervical dystonia. After plasmaexchange or IA-PA, BoNT/A was reinjected. Antibodies were measured witha sensitive functional toxin neutralising test.
Repeated use of plasma exchange and IA-PA depletedneutralising antibodies to below the detection limit and subsequently allowed successful BoNT/A injection into dystonic muscles. No seriousside effects were found related to the depletion of IgG.
In conclusion PE or IA-PA performed before BoNT/Areadministration may provide an alternative strategy in treatingselected secondary non-responders who are severely disabled.

  相似文献   

8.
Cervical dystonia (CD) is the most common form of focal dystonia treated with botulinum toxin (BoNT) injections. BoNT has been shown in numerous clinical trials to correct the abnormal posture and movement and to markedly reduce pain associated with CD. In addition, BoNT has favorably modified the natural history of the disease by preventing contractures and other complications of CD, such as secondary degenerative changes of the cervical spine and associated radiculopathy. In a long-term follow-up of patients treated for up to 20 years, the duration of response appears to be sustained and the risk of immunoresistance due to blocking antibodies is relatively small. This review provides and update on the treatment of CD with BoNT type A (BOTOX, Dysport, Xeomin and BoNT type B (Myobloc, NeuroBloc.  相似文献   

9.
Botulinum toxin (BoNT) is an established mainstay treatment for dystonia. However, its use, especially in developing countries, is significantly limited by its cost. Chemodenervation with muscle afferent block (MAB) using lidocaine-ethanol may provide a more cost-effective alternative to traditional BoNT injections. A study comparing MAB with BoNT type-A in cases of X-linked dystonia-Parkinsonism (XDP) having cervical dystonia indicated a modest and short-lived efficacy with MAB, while a more robust efficacy in dystonia and pain parameters, lasting up to 11 weeks, was observed in the two BoNT type-A preparations (Dysport? and Botox?). In another study comparing BoNT type-A formulations for limb dystonia of XDP, a prior MAB was used to select target muscles for toxin injection. During toxin injections in the limb muscles, Dysport? and Botox? did not show significant differences with regard to global severity and disability scales, duration of effect, and adverse event (AE) profile. Dysphagia was the most common AE following BoNT type-A injections in cervical dystonia, while weakness was the most frequent AE noted with injections for limb dystonia. MAB injections carried a high incidence of dizziness and pain during injections. However, because MAB is a more cost-effective alternative that can be given repeatedly, it has been used in the XDP population while awaiting funds for BoNT type-A and/or for selecting muscles for injection as a test drug.  相似文献   

10.
The objective of this study was to compare efficacy, safety, and duration of botulinum toxin type A (BoNT‐A) and type B (BoNT‐B) in toxin‐naïve cervical dystonia (CD) subjects. BoNT‐naïve CD subjects were randomized to BoNT‐A or BoNT‐B and evaluated in a double‐blind trial at baseline and every 4‐weeks following one treatment. The primary measure was the change in Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) from baseline to week 4 post‐injection. Secondary measures included change in TWSTRS‐subscale scores, pain, global impressions, and duration of response and safety assessments. The study was designed as a noninferiority trial of BoNT‐B to BoNT‐A. 111 subjects were randomized (55 BoNT‐A; 56 BoNT‐B). Improvement in TWSTRS‐total scores 4 weeks after BoNT‐B was noninferior to BoNT‐A (adjusted means 11.0 (SE 1.2) and 8.8 (SE 1.2), respectively; per‐protocol‐population (PPP)). The median duration of effect of BoNT‐A and BoNT‐B was not different (13.1 vs. 13.7 weeks, respectively; P‐value = 0.833; PPP). There were no significant differences in the occurrence of injection site pain and dysphagia. Mild dry mouth was more frequent with BoNT‐B but there were no differences for moderate/severe dry mouth. In this study, both BoNT‐A and B were shown to be effective and safe for the treatment of toxin‐naive CD subjects. © 2007 Movement Disorder Society  相似文献   

设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号