Randomized double-blind parallel-group study comparing cognitive effects of a low-dose lamotrigine with valproate and placebo in healthy volunteers

PURPOSE: This study aimed at investigating the cognitive and mood effects of lamotrigine (LTG) versus valproate (VPA) and placebo (PBO). METHODS: By studying the effects in healthy volunteers, it is possible to separate the genuine effects of LTG from the cognitive improvements, caused by better seizure control. The study used a pretest-posttest comparison of 50 mg LTG, 900 mg VPA, or PBO in a double-blind single-dummy parallel-group design with 30 healthy volunteers. Study duration was 12 days (with a last control on day 13). Outcome measures included cognitive tests (FePsy neuropsychological test battery), mood scales (ASL; mood-rating scale), and a scale for subjective complaints (ABNAS Neurotoxicity scale). Total sleep time was controlled with actigraphic recordings. The results were analyzed by comparing the change over time (pretest with posttest) for the three treatments with Student's t tests. RESULTS: COGNITIVE TESTS: significant differences between the treatments were found for measurements of cognitive activation (i.e., three of the four simple reaction-time measurements showed statistically significant differences in change between PBO and LTG in favor of LTG (p=0.03; 0.03; 0.04); two of four tests showed statistically significant differences in change between LTG and VPA, both in favor of LTG (p=0.03; 0.05). SUBJECTIVE COMPLAINTS: the ABNAS-neurotoxicity scale reveals a significant reduction of drug-related cognitive complaints for the subjects taking LTG, relative to VPA (p=0.02). MOOD RATING: significant changes were found on the scale assessing "tiredness," showing increased tiredness/sedation for VPA relative to PBO (p=0.02) and on the "timid scale" for LTG reporting "being more at ease" compared with both PBO and VPA (p=0.02; 0.02). The general direction of change for the mood scales was toward "activation" for LTG (five of six scales improved), whereas for VPA, the reverse effect was found (four of six scales showed a change in the direction of "tiredness/sedation"). CONCLUSIONS: Short-term treatment in normal volunteers with a low dose of LTG resulted in improved cognitive activation on simple reaction-time measurements, a more positive subjective report about the impact of drug treatment relative to VPA, and mood changes concurring with the activating effect demonstrated by the cognitive tests.     

The influence of antiepileptic drugs on cognition: a comparison of levetiracetam with topiramate

Levetiracetam (LEV) and topiramate (TPM) are considered highly effective novel antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in the treatment of focal epilepsies. To explore potential side effects, this study investigated their influence on cognitive functions comparatively by means of a standardized neuropsychological test battery assessing several cognitive domains. In this observational study, cognitive changes were explored in 30 consecutively recruited patients with focal epilepsy treated with LEV and in 21 patients treated with TPM, comparing functions assessed prior to gradual initiation and after reaching steady state of the individual target dosage. Before titration, patient groups did not differ significantly with respect to cognitive performance. Whereas the LEV group manifested no change in cognitive performance after AED titration, the TPM group worsened in the cognitive domains of cognitive speed and verbal fluency, as well as short-term memory. These findings suggest that TPM, unlike LEV, may impair frontal lobe functions. The lack of cognitive side effects related to LEV treatment may be relevant for treatment decisions.     

Comparison of the Steady-State Pharmacokinetics of Topiramate and Valproate in Patients with Epilepsy During Monotherapy and Concomitant Therapy

Summary: Purpose: The steady-state pharmacokinetics of valproate (VPA) and topiramate (TPM) were compared during VPA monotherapy, concomitant VPA and TPM therapy, and TPM monotherapy to evaluate pharmacokinetic interactions. Methods: After a 3-week baseline period, 12 patients receiving VPA monotherapy (500 to 2,250 mg every 12 h) received TPM at three escalating doses (from 100 to 200 to 400 mg every 12 h), each for 2 weeks. Thereafter, the VPA dose was tapered by 25% weekly. Blood and urine samples were collected over 12-h intervals during VPA monotherapy and at the end of each stage of TPM dose escalation and TPM monotherapy. Results: All patients reached TPM monotherapy, and nine achieved satisfactory seizure control for 2 weeks without VPA. TPM plasma peak concentration (C_max) and area under the concentration-versus-time curve during a 12–h dosing interval (AUC_0–12) were slightly higher (17%; n = 8) during TPM monotherapy than during concomitant VPA therapy. TPM oral and renal clearances (n = 8) were 25.9 ± 4.6 and 11.6 ± 3.2 ml/min during TPM monotherapy and were 29.8 ± 4.2 and 12.4 ± 2.7 ml/min during VPA concomitant therapy. VPA AUC_(0–12) decreased (11.3%; n = 10) with the addition of TPM 400 mg every 12 h. VPA oral clearance was 12.8 ± 4.1 ml/min during monotherapy and was 13.8 ± 4.0,14.1 ± 3.9, and 14.5 ± 5.2 ml/min during coadministration of TPM 100, 200, and 400 mg every 12 h, respectively. Cognitive dysfunction, observed in some patients receiving high doses of VPA with TPM, reversed or improved with VPA dose reduction and discontinuation. The lower-than-normal prestudy platelet count measured in one patient increased to normal levels when VPA was discontinued. Conclusions: Because changes in TPM and VPA pharmacokinetics were small, it is unlikely that their concomitant use will have a significant impact on the clinical condition of the patient.     

The effects on cognitive function and behavioral problems of topiramate compared to carbamazepine as monotherapy for children with benign rolandic epilepsy

PURPOSE: To evaluate the cognitive and behavioral effects of topiramate (TPM) versus carbamazepine (CBZ) using efficacious doses of each drug as monotherapy for children with benign rolandic epilepsy. METHODS: A multicenter, randomized, open-label, observer-blinded, parallel-group clinical trial was conducted. TPM was introduced at a dose of 12.5 mg/day with the minimum target dose of 50 mg/day in patients <30 kg and 75 mg/day in patients >30 kg over 4 weeks. CBZ was started at a dose of 10 mg/kg/day with the minimum target dose of 20 mg/kg/day over 4 weeks. Additional individual escalation was allowed up to a maximum target dose. The primary study end point was change on a neuropsychological test battery after 28 weeks of treatment. RESULTS: Neuropsychological data were available for 88 patients (45 patients for TPM and 43 patients for CBZ). Of the cognitive variables measured, arithmetic showed significant worsening in TPM (p = 0.037). An additional test, for maze, also showed a significantly greater improvement for CBZ (p = 0.026). Of behavioral variables, no significant changes were found but the scores had a negative trend for the TPM. When 30 patients on the minimum target dose for TPM were compared to 40 patients treated with minimum target CBZ, there was no significant worsening of cognitive and behavioral effects in the TPM. CONCLUSION: The pattern of neuropsychometric changes with TPM seemed to be slightly worse overall than CBZ. However, outcome with the minimum target dose did not differ significantly in comparisons between the treatment groups.     

Conversion from valproic acid onto topiramate in adolescents and adults with epilepsy

Objective – To explore efficacy and tolerability outcomes of topiramate (TPM) in patients with epilepsy transitioning from valproic acid (VPA) because of insufficient efficacy and/or tolerability onto TPM. Methods – Multicenter, open label, single arm, non‐interventional study examining patients (≥12 years) with epilepsy, transitioning onto TPM from baseline mono‐or combination therapy with VPA. TPM was added onto the existing antiepileptic drug (AED) treatment and started at a dose of 25 mg once daily. The dose was titrated up with 25 mg/day increments, once every 1–2 weeks, until a final dose between 50–200 mg/day was reached. Based on clinical judgment, the treating physician decided whether or not and when the existing AED treatment especially with VPA could be withdrawn. Documented were type and frequency of seizures, TPM dose, quality of life (QOLIE‐10 questionnaire), subjective perception of improvement, and adverse events (AE). Results – One hundered and forty‐seven patients (59% women, mean age 41 years) switched from baseline VPA treatment onto TPM because of insufficient efficacy (61%) and/or poor tolerability (81%). Average duration of follow‐up was 20.3 weeks with an overall discontinuation rate of 16.3% of patients, mainly because of AE (in 8.2% of 147 patients). At study endpoint, the intended shift to TPM monotherapy was achieved in 70% of patients at a median dose of 150 mg/day. A seizure reduction of ≥50% was achieved in 75% of patients in the last scheduled period (week 8–20), and 51% of patients entering that period remained seizure‐free. Quality of life improved significantly as compared with baseline for all domains of QOLIE‐10 (P < 0.001). Most frequent AEs were weight decrease (4.8%), paraesthesia and fatigue (4.1% each), speech disorder and headaches (2.7% each). Conclusions – In patients with epilepsy not satisfactorily treated with VPA, conversion to TPM was associated with improved seizure control as well as improvement in several aspects of quality of life.     

Topiramate,carbamazepine and valproate monotherapy: double-blind comparison in newly diagnosed epilepsy

OBJECTIVES: To compare topiramate (TPM) with investigator's choice of carbamazepine (CBZ) or valproate (VPA) for initial treatment in patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In patients with epilepsy diagnosed within previous 3 months, investigators selected CBZ (600 mg/day) or VPA (1250 mg/day) as preferred therapy based on the patient's clinical presentation. Based on investigators' treatment choice, patients (n=613) were assigned to the CBZ or VPA treatment branch. Within each branch, patients were randomized to double-blind treatment with the traditional antiepileptic drugs (CBZ or VPA), TPM 100 mg/day, or TPM 200 mg/day. Patients continued double-blind treatment until exiting the study or until 6 months after last patient randomized. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences between fixed doses of TPM and CBZ or VPA were observed in efficacy measures: time to exit, time to first seizure, and the proportion of patients seizure-free during the last 6 months of treatment. TPM 100 mg/day was associated with the fewest discontinuations due to adverse events. CONCLUSION: In patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy, an initial target dose of TPM 100 mg/day is at least as effective as therapeutic doses of CBZ and VPA.     

Drug Interaction Profile of Topiramate

Summary: In separate studies, potential pharmacokinetic interactions of topiramate (TPM) with phenytoin (PHT), carbamazepine (CBZ), and valproate (VPA) were evaluated. TPM was added to the baseline antiepileptic drug (AED) at a dosage of up to 800 mg/day, after which the baseline drug was discontinued, when possible. Addition of TPM produced no change in plasma levels of CBZ or CBZ epoxide (CBZ-E). Modest increases in PHT plasma levels in six of 12 patients treated with PHT and TPM, and a small mean decrease in VPA levels noted in patients receiving VPA with TPM, were considered unlikely to require adjustments in the dosage of the concomitant AED when TPM is added or discontinued. When patients were changed from concomitant therapy with PHT or CBZ to TPM monotherapy, TPM clearance was reduced by approximately 50%, suggesting that an adjustment in TPM dose may be required when PHT or CBZ is discontinued from TPM-treated patients. A slight increase in plasma TPM levels during monotherapy compared to concomitant therapy with VPA was considered clinically insignificant and not likely to require TPM dosage adjustment. In another study, oral clearance of digoxin was slightly increased when TPM was added, resulting in a small decrease in peak plasma levels of digoxin. In vitro studies conducted to date on a number of specific cy-tochrome P450 isoforms show an effect of TPM only on the CYP2C_meph isoform. The risk for clinically meaningful changes in plasma levels of traditional AEDs when TPM is added to or discontinued from concomitant regimens appears to be minimal. However, adjustments in TPM dosages are likely to be needed when potent enzyme inducers, such as PHT or CBZ, are added or discontinued. TPM has a relatively low propensity for clinically significant drug interactions, and its pharmacokinetic and drug interaction profiles represent a clear advance over those of the traditional AEDs.     

Kognitive Beeinträchtigungen unter Add-on-Therapie mit Topiramat

In an open study, 37 epilepsy patients were investigated with regard to cognitive impairments in anticonvulsant add-on therapy with topiramate (TPM). In addition to a preexisting antiepileptic medication, TPM administration was started and increased by 25 mg/week. Cognitive side effects noted by the patient or doctor were assessed by a neuropsychological test battery. In 18/37 patients (49%), cognitive deficits consisting of impaired concentration, psychomotoric slowing, memory deficits, and dysphasia were observed. The adverse effects became apparent at dosages of 50-575 mg TPM/day (average 210 mg). In four patients, they were reversible after reducing the dose of TPM by 25-150 mg/day. In eight patients, the adverse effects led to withdrawal of TPM. In spite of slow titration, the present study showed a higher frequency of cognitive side effects under TPM than was previously reported. In some patients, these side effects led to substantial impairments in daily life and at work. For early recognition of cognitive impairments, neuropsychological baseline and follow-up investigations of verbal fluency, psychomotor processing speed, and verbal memory are recommended.     

Cognitive and psychiatric effects of topiramate monotherapy in migraine treatment: an open study

Few data are available on cognitive and psychiatric effects of topiramate (TPM) monotherapy in migraine. Twenty patients affected by migraine were treated with TPM monotherapy. At the same time, twenty control subjects were selected. A comprehensive neuropsychological and behavioural battery of tests were performed at baseline (T0), at titration (T1) and in maintenance period (T2). Topiramate serum levels were also investigated at T1 and T2. On comparison with the control group, no cognitive and psychiatric differences were detected at baseline. A significant reduction of word fluency score ( P  < 0.05) was evident after TPM treatment, both at T1 and T2. No patient developed psychiatric adverse events. TPM induced an impairment of verbal fluency and no psychiatric adverse events, demonstrating selective negative cognitive profile in migraine therapy. Slow titration, low doses, lack of previous psychiatric disorders and/or familial history may explain our data.