Efficacy and Adverse Effects of Established and New Antiepileptic Drugs*

Summary: Antiepileptic drug (AED) selection is based primarily on efficacy for specific seizure types and epileptic syndromes. However, efficacy is often similar for the different AEDs, and other properties such as adverse effects, pharmacokinetic properties, and cost may also be of importance. For idiopathic generalized epilepsies with absence, tonic-clonic, and myoclonic seizures, the AED of choice is valproate (VPA). Secondarily generalized epilepsies with tonic, atonic, and other seizure types are difficult to treat with any single AED or combination of AEds. The AEDs of choice for absence seizures are ethosuximide (ESM) and VPA. For control of primary generalized tonic-clonic seizures, any of the other major AEDs can be effective. If VPA cannot be prescribed, carbamazepine (CBZ), phenobarbital (PB), phenytoin (PHT), or primidone (PRM) may be effective, but ESM or a benzodiazepine (BZD) must be added to control associated absence or myoclonic seizures. The AEDs of first choice for partial epilepsies with partial and secondarily generalized tonic-clonic seizures are CBZ and PHT. Increasing evidence suggests that VPA is a good alternative when CBZ and PHT fail. PB and PRM are second-choice selections because of adverse effects. A combination of two of the five standard AEDs may be necessary to treat intractable seizures, but no studies have been done to indicate an optimal combination. Other epilepsy syndromes such as neonatal and infantile epilepsies, febrile epilepsy, alcoholic epilepsy, and status epilepticus require specific AED treatment. Ultimately, AED selection must be individualized. No “drug of choice” can be named for all patients. The expected efficacy for the seizure type, the importance of the expected adverse effects, the pharmacokinetics, and the cost of the AEDs all must be weighed and discussed with the patient before a choice is made. A number of new AEDs with unique mechanisms of action, pharmacokinetic properties, and fewer adverse effects hold important promise of improved epilepsy treatment.     

Differential effects of antiepileptic drugs on neonatal outcomes

Offspring of women with epilepsy (WWE) on AEDs are at increased risks for major congenital malformations and reduced cognition. They may be at risk for other adverse neonatal outcomes. Women with epilepsy on carbamazepine (CBZ), lamotrigine (LTG), phenytoin (PHT), or valproate (VPA) monotherapy were enrolled in a prospective, observational, multicenter study of the neurodevelopmental effects of AEDs. The odds ratio for small for gestational age (SGA) was higher for VPA vs. PHT, VPA vs. LTG, and CBZ vs. PHT. Microcephaly rates were elevated to 12% for all newborns and at 12 months old, but normalized by age 24 months. Reduced Apgar scores occurred more frequently in the VPA and PHT groups at 1 min, but scores were near normal in all groups at 5 min. This study demonstrates increased risks for being born SGA in the VPA and CBZ groups, and transiently reduced Apgar scores in the VPA and PHT groups. Differential risks among the AEDs can help inform decisions about AED selection for women during childbearing years.     

Kindling Increases the Sensitivity of Rats to Adverse Effects of Certain Antiepileptic Drugs

Summary: Development of novel antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) requires determining the margin between the desired anticonvulsant effect and undesired adverse effects (AE) (therapeutic index).For this purpose, drug-induced “minimal neurological deficits” (e.g., motor dysfunctions) are commonly quantified by simple tests, such as the rotarod test, in normal, i.e., nonepileptic animals. However, increasing evidence shows that chronic brain dysfunction associated with epilepsy may increase susceptibility to the AE of certain AEDs, e.g., N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonists. The increased. AE potential of such investigational drugs can be predicted by using kindled rats instead of normal rodents in preclinical drug evaluation studies. In the present experiments, we wished to determine whether kindled rats also exhibit an altered susceptibility to neurological adverse effects of standard AEDs, i.e., carbamazepine (CBZ), phenobarbital (PB), valproate (VPA), and diazepam (DZP). Abecarnil, a novel benzodiazepine (BZD) receptor agonist, was included in the study for comparison. All drugs were administered in diverse doses in kindled and nonkindled rats, and all behavioral alterations were scored in the cage and open field. Furthermore, the rotarod test was used to detect and quantify motor impairment induced by drug treatments. Kindled rats were more susceptible than nonkindled rats to motor impairment (ataxia and/or rotarod failures) induced by high doses of AEDs, although differences were noted between the drugs tested. VPA was the only drug that induced stereotyped behavior; it was much more potent in this respect in kindled than nonkindled rats. Abecarnil did not differ substantially in its AE in either subgroup of animals. Our data indicate that epileptogenesis induced by kindling renders the brain more susceptible to certain AE of AEDs. To avoid overestimation of the therapeutic index, models such as kindling should be used during preclinical evaluation of new AEDs.     

Pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic interactions between common antiepileptic drugs and acetone, the chief anticonvulsant ketone body elevated in the ketogenic diet in mice

Purpose:   Acetone is the principal ketone body elevated in the ketogenic diet (KD), with demonstrated robust anticonvulsant properties across a variety of seizure tests and models of epilepsy. Because the majority of patients continue to receive antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) during KD treatment, interactions between acetone and AEDs may have important clinical implications. Therefore, we investigated whether acetone could affect the anticonvulsant activity and pharmacokinetic properties of several AEDs against maximal electroshock (MES)–induced seizures in mice.
Methods:   Effects of acetone given in subthreshold doses were tested on the anticonvulsant effects of carbamazepine (CBZ), lamotrigine (LTG), oxcarbazepine (OXC), phenobarbital (PB), phenytoin (PHT), topiramate (TPM) and valproate (VPA) against MES-induced seizures in mice. In addition, acute adverse effects of acetone–AEDs combinations were assessed in the chimney test (motor performance) and passive avoidance task (long-term memory). Pharmacokinetic interactions between acetone and AEDs were also studied in the mouse brain tissue.
Results:   Acetone (5 or 7.5 mmol/kg, intraperitoneally [i.p.]) enhanced the anticonvulsant activity of CBZ, LTG, PB, and VPA against MES-induced seizures; effects of OXC, PHT, and TPM were not changed. Acetone (7.5 mmol/kg) did not enhance the acute adverse-effect profiles of the studied AEDs. Acetone (5 or 7.5 mmol/kg, i.p.) did not affect total brain concentrations of the studied AEDs. In contrast, VPA, CBZ, LTG, OXC, and TPM significantly decreased the concentration of free acetone in the brain; PB and PHT had no effect.
Conclusions:   Acetone enhances the anticonvulsant effects of several AEDs such as VPA, CBZ, LTG, and PB without affecting their pharmacokinetic and side-effect profiles.     

Lack of Interaction of Gabapentin with Carbamazepine or Valproate

Summary: Gabapentin (GBP) studies were conducted in patients with epilepsy receiving carbamazepine (CBZ, n= 12) or valproate (VPA, n = 14) monotherapy. The effects of GBP coadministration on steady-state CBZ or VPA concentrations and of these antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) on GBP pharmacokinetics were investigated. GBP (400 mg) was coadministered every 8 h for 3% days with CBZ or for 5 1/3 days with VPA. GBP was well tolerated. Mean steady-state plasma CBZ/CBZ-10, ll-epoxide (CBZ-E) and serum VPA concentrations before, during, and after GBP administration were not significantly different. Mean steady-state GBP pharmacokinetic parameters during CBZ or VPA coadministration were similar to steady-state parameters reported in healthy subjects. Thus, no pharmacokinetic interaction exists between CBZ or VPA and GBP. No dosage adjustment is necessary when GBP and CBZ or VPA are coadministered.     

Drug Interaction Profile of Topiramate

Summary: In separate studies, potential pharmacokinetic interactions of topiramate (TPM) with phenytoin (PHT), carbamazepine (CBZ), and valproate (VPA) were evaluated. TPM was added to the baseline antiepileptic drug (AED) at a dosage of up to 800 mg/day, after which the baseline drug was discontinued, when possible. Addition of TPM produced no change in plasma levels of CBZ or CBZ epoxide (CBZ-E). Modest increases in PHT plasma levels in six of 12 patients treated with PHT and TPM, and a small mean decrease in VPA levels noted in patients receiving VPA with TPM, were considered unlikely to require adjustments in the dosage of the concomitant AED when TPM is added or discontinued. When patients were changed from concomitant therapy with PHT or CBZ to TPM monotherapy, TPM clearance was reduced by approximately 50%, suggesting that an adjustment in TPM dose may be required when PHT or CBZ is discontinued from TPM-treated patients. A slight increase in plasma TPM levels during monotherapy compared to concomitant therapy with VPA was considered clinically insignificant and not likely to require TPM dosage adjustment. In another study, oral clearance of digoxin was slightly increased when TPM was added, resulting in a small decrease in peak plasma levels of digoxin. In vitro studies conducted to date on a number of specific cy-tochrome P450 isoforms show an effect of TPM only on the CYP2C_meph isoform. The risk for clinically meaningful changes in plasma levels of traditional AEDs when TPM is added to or discontinued from concomitant regimens appears to be minimal. However, adjustments in TPM dosages are likely to be needed when potent enzyme inducers, such as PHT or CBZ, are added or discontinued. TPM has a relatively low propensity for clinically significant drug interactions, and its pharmacokinetic and drug interaction profiles represent a clear advance over those of the traditional AEDs.     

Thyroid function in men taking carbamazepine, oxcarbazepine, or valproate for epilepsy

PURPOSE: Antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) may affect serum thyroid hormone concentrations. This study aimed to evaluate thyroid function in men taking carbamazepine (CBZ), oxcarbazepine (OCBZ), or valproate (VPA) for epilepsy. METHODS: Ninety men with epilepsy (40 taking CBZ, 29 taking OCBZ, and 21 taking VPA monotherapy) and 25 control subjects participated in the study. After clinical examination, a blood sample for hormone, gamma-glutamyl-transferase (GGT) and antibody (ab) assays was obtained. RESULTS: Serum thyroxine (T4) and free thyroxine (FT4) concentrations were low in men taking CBZ or OCBZ. Forty-five percent of men taking CBZ and 24% of men taking OCBZ had serum T4 and/or FT4 levels below the reference range. However, no correlations were found between T4 or FT4 and GGT concentrations in men taking CBZ or OCBZ. Thirteen percent of men taking CBZ, 17% of men taking OCBZ, and 6% of control men had increased levels of thyroid peroxidase (TPO)-ab and/or thyroglobulin (TG)-ab, but these were not associated with altered serum thyroid hormone concentrations. Serum triiodothyronine and thyrotropin levels in men taking CBZ or OCBZ were normal. In men taking VPA, the concentrations of thyroid hormones, thyrotropin, and antithyroid ab were normal. CONCLUSIONS: Serum thyroid hormone concentrations are low in CBZ- or OCBZ-treated men. However, these low levels do not seem to be due to liver enzyme induction or activation of immunologic mechanisms. Therefore, interference with hypothalamic regulation of thyroid function by CBZ and OCBZ seems possible. VPA does not have any significant effects on thyroid function.     

Antiepileptic Drugs, Learning, and Behavior in Childhood Epilepsy

Summary: Cognitive and behavioral impairments are found more often among epileptic children than among their peers. The cause of these impairments is multifactorial. Identifying the relative contribution of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) to these problems has been the object of a large number of clinical investigations. This area of research has been characterized by an unusually high number of methodological challenges and pitfalls. Accordingly, results have often been inconsistent and contradictory, except for the more obvious observations that can be derived from clinical experience. Overall, the effects of AEDs on cognition and behavior in children have been overrated in the past. More recent research has benefited from the methodological lessons of previous studies and it suggests that the majority of children taking AEDs do not experience clinically relevant cognitive of behavioral adverse effects from these medications. In addition, some of the newer AEDs may indeed have a better cognitive profile. Nevertheless, clinical experience must be used to identify the subgroup of children who remain at risk for significant and clinically relevant cognitive and behavioral adverse effects of AEDs.     

Pregnancy and the Risk of Teratogenicity

Summary: One in every 250 newborns is exposed to antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in utero. Various studies have attributed a teratogenic effect to these AEDs, mainly consisting of major malformations, minor anomalies, intrauterine or postnatal growth failure, and psychomotor retardation. Prospective studies confirm the increased risk of major malformations. The absolute risk of 7–10% is about 3–5% higher than that in the general population. Barbiturates and phe-nytoin (PHT) are particularly associated with congenital heart malformations, facial clefts, and some other malformations. Valproate (VPA) and carbamazepine (CBZ) are associated predominantly with spina bifida aperta (1–2 and 0.5–1.0% risk, respectively) and hypospadias. Bilateral radial aplasia is a rare but specific effect of VPA. Several studies identified additional risk factors, i.e., high daily AED dosage, high maternal serum AED concentrations, low folate levels, or po-lytherapy [phenobarbital (PB) plus primidone (PRM) plus PHT or CBZ plus VPA plus PB with or without PHT]. The few prospective studies controlled for socioeconomic factors or that considered parental findings indicate that risk of specific cognitive defects rather than risk of overall mental retardation may be increased, that early growth retardation is followed by a catch-up growth to normal, and that ocular hypertelorism and nail hypoplasia are the only minor anomalies causally related to PHT exposure. However, no final conclusions can be made. Genetic predisposition to the teratogenic side effects of AEDs plays a role, codetermining the recurrence risk if the woman has previously given birth to a child with a major malformation. The molecular genetic basis of this predisposition is unclear. No tests are yet available for identifying parents or fetuses at particularly high risk. Prevention of teratogenic AED side effects is possible by critical evaluation, before pregnancy, of the woman's need for AED therapy. If AED therapy cannot be avoided, it should be monotherapy with the lowest possible dosage. High peak levels should be avoided by dividing the daily dosage into at least two or three doses. The efficacy of folate supplementation alone in reducing teratogenic risks is unclear. In cases of obvious folate deficiency, treatment is required, but concomitant vitamin B₁₂ deficiency should first be excluded or treated. Prenatal diagnosis should be offered. It may consist of fetal ultrasound examination during Week 18–20, and of afetoprotein analysis of amniotic fluid obtained during Week 16 if the mother is receiving VPA or CBZ. This should be discussed with the parents before the pregnancy. The choice of medication is made not only by balancing the therapeutic advantages and teratogenic risks of each AED or AED combination but also by considering the parental attitudes toward prenatal diagnosis and termination of pregnancy.     

Metabolism of Antiepileptic Medication: Newborn to Elderly

Summary: Epilepsy affects individuals of all ages. Regimens of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) and side-effect profiles differ for infants, children, adults, and the elderly. Thus, the epileptologist must be familiar with the specific changes of AED metabolism with age. In general, metabolic rates are fastest in children; therefore, AED half-lives are shortest in this group. Rates of AED elimination are slowest in neonates, infants, and children. Thus, children need larger dosages, on a mg/kg basis, than adults. The usual phenytora (PHT) dosage in adults is 4–6 mg/kg per day, but children may need a dosage three to five times higher. On the other hand, the PHT dosages in the elderly may need to be 3–4 mg/kg per day to achieve therapeutic levels. Likewise, the half-life of carbamazepine (CBZ) is shortest in children and the elderly. Profiles of metabolites may also be age-specific, a difference of particular importance for valproate (VPA). The relative amount of VPA metabolized to 4-ene is more than twofold less in adults than in children, which may explain the different profile of hepatotoxicity seen by age. The elderly may be more vulnerable to adverse effects of AEDs. Many elderly have neurologic deficits that may render them more vulnerable to neurotoxic effects such as ataxia and cognitive disturbances. Also, low serum albumin concentrations, which result in decreased binding, may mask high serum AED concentrations. The hyponatremia associated with CBZ may be a particular concern in the elderly. Gingival hyperplasia, a concern in children, may not be a problem in the elderly.