Luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone and oxytocin response to hyperosmotic stimulation: in vitro study

It was shown previously that luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) affects the neurohypophysial oxytocin release in water-deprived rats. However, the detailed mechanisms by which LHRH modifies the oxytocin response to hyperosmotic stimulation have not been explained so far. Using the isolated hypothalamo-neurohypophysial explants obtained from euhydrated rats, the effect of LHRH on the oxytocin secretion was studied under conditions of direct osmotic (i.e., Na(+)- evoked) as well as nonosmotic (i.e., K(+)-evoked) stimulation. Additionally, the oxytocin response to LHRH was investigated using the explants obtained from animals drinking 2% saline for eight days (systemic, i. e., both direct and indirect, osmotic stimulation). LHRH significantly enhanced Na(+)- and K(+)-evoked oxytocin release from explants taken from rats drinking tap water, indicating that LHRH could affect the Na(+)/K(+)-dependent depolarization of perikarya of oxytocin neurones. In contrast, LHRH significantly diminished the K(+)-stimulated hormone release when the neurohypophysial complex was obtained from previously salt-loaded rats, suggesting that peripheral osmotic stimulation somehow modifies the sensitivity of oxytocinergic neurones to LHRH (possible mechanisms are discussed). It is concluded that LHRH may participate in the regulation of oxytocin secretion via both direct and indirect impact on magnocellular oxytocinergic neurones depending on the current functional status of the hypothalamo-neurohypophysial complex.     

Brain stimulation: a therapeutic approach for the treatment of neurological disorders

Brain stimulation has become one of the most acceptable therapeutic approaches in recent years and a powerful tool in the remedy against neurological diseases. Brain stimulation is achieved through the application of electric currents using non-invasive as well as invasive techniques. Recent technological advancements have evolved into the development of precise devices with capacity to produce well-controlled and effective brain stimulation. Currently, most used non-invasive techniques are repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), whereas the most common invasive technique is deep brain stimulation (DBS). In last decade, application of these brain stimulation techniques has not only exploded but also expanded to wide variety of neurological disorders. Therefore, in the current review, we will provide an overview of the potential of both non-invasive (rTMS and tDCS) and invasive (DBS) brain stimulation techniques in the treatment of such brain diseases.     

Preferential activation of muscle fibers with peripheral magnetic stimulation of the limb

Magnetic and electric activation of limb nerve and muscle were compared in normal subjects of different age, gender, and habitus. Direct stimulation of nerve and muscle showed that activation of intramuscular nerve fibers in the arm and leg occurs at a lower threshold for magnetic stimulation than for electric stimulation. Sensory nerve fibers had a lower threshold with electric stimulation. Muscle activation and stimulus artifact with magnetic stimulation precluded reliable recording of distal sensory nerve action potential in all subjects.     

Existing and emerging applications for the neuromodulation of nerve activity through targeted delivery of electric stimuli

Abstract

The effective treatment of many diseases requires the use of multiple treatment strategies among which neuromodulation is playing an increasingly important role. Neuromodulation devices that act to normalize or modulate nerve activity through the targeted delivery of electrical stimuli will be the focus of this review. These devices encompass deep brain stimulators, vagus nerve stimulators, spinal cord simulators and sacral nerve stimulators. Already neuromodulation has proven successful in the treatment of a broad range of conditions from Parkinson’s disease to chronic pain and urinary incontinence. Many of these approaches seek to exploit the activities of the autonomic nervous system, which influences organ function through the release of neurotransmitters and associated signalling cascades. This review will outline existing and emerging applications for each of these neuromodulation devices, proposed mechanisms of action and clinical studies evaluating both their safety and therapeutic efficacy.     

Non pharmacological treatment for neuropathic pain: Invasive and non-invasive cortical stimulation

The use of medications in chronic neuropathic pain may be limited with regard to efficacy and tolerance. Therefore, non-pharmacological approaches, using electrical stimulation of the cortex has been proposed as an alternative. First, in the early nineties, surgically-implanted epidural motor cortex stimulation (EMCS) was proven to be effective to relieve refractory neuropathic pain. Later, non-invasive stimulation techniques were found to produce similar analgesic effects, at least by means of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) targeting the primary motor cortex (M1). Following “high-frequency” rTMS (e.g., stimulation frequency ranging from 5 to 20 Hz) delivered to the precentral gyrus (e.g., M1 region), it is possible to obtain an analgesic effect via the modulation of several remote brain regions involved in nociceptive information processing or control. This pain reduction can last for weeks beyond the time of the stimulation, especially if repeated sessions are performed, probably related to processes of long-term synaptic plasticity. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), another form of transcranial stimulation, using low-intensity electrical currents, generally delivered by a pair of large electrodes, has also shown some efficacy to improve patients with chronic pain syndromes. The mechanism of action of tDCS differs from that of EMCS and rTMS, but the cortical target is the same, which is M1. Although the level of evidence of therapeutic efficacy in the context of neuropathic pain is lower for tDCS than for rTMS, interesting perspectives are opened by using at-home tDCS protocols for long-term management. Now, there is a scientific basis for recommending both EMCS and rTMS of M1 to treat refractory chronic neuropathic pain, but their application in clinical practice remains limited due to practical and regulatory issues.     

Evidence for peripheral, but not central modulation of trigeminal cold receptive cells in the rat

The effects of locus coeruleus (LC), periaqueductal grey (PAG) and segmental stimulation (all of which are known to inhibit convergent nociceptive cells), were tested on the activity of cold receptive cells in the trigeminal system of the rat. LC and PAG stimulation from sites which inhibited convergent nociceptive cells had no effect on cells with cold receptive input in the trigeminal nucleus caudalis. Electrical or mechanical segmental stimulation caused suppression of activity in cold receptive trigeminal nucleus neurons. Recording from the trigeminal ganglion showed this suppression to be a property of the primary afferent cold receptors themselves and therefore it is not analogous to the proposed mechanism for the segmental inhibition of convergent nociceptive neurons.     

Therapeutic potential of brain stimulation techniques in the treatment of mental,psychiatric, and cognitive disorders

Treatment for brain diseases has been disappointing because available medications have failed to produce clinical response across all the patients. Many patients either do not respond or show partial and inconsistent effect, and even in patients who respond to the medications have high relapse rates. Brain stimulation has been seen as an alternative and effective remedy. As a result, brain stimulation has become one of the most valuable therapeutic tools for combating against brain diseases. In last decade, studies with the application of brain stimulation techniques not only have grown exponentially but also have expanded to wide range of brain disorders. Brain stimulation involves passing electric currents into the cortical and subcortical area brain cells with the use of noninvasive as well as invasive methods to amend brain functions. Over time, technological advancements have evolved into the development of precise devices; however, at present, most used noninvasive techniques are repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), whereas the most common invasive technique is deep brain stimulation (DBS). In the current review, we will provide an overview of the potential of noninvasive (rTMS and tDCS) and invasive (DBS) brain stimulation techniques focusing on the treatment of mental, psychiatric, and cognitive disorders.