Improvement of spatial tactile acuity by transcranial direct current stimulation.

OBJECTIVE: Non-invasive brain stimulation such as transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been successfully used to induce polarity-specific excitability changes in the brain. However, it is still unknown if anodal tDCS (tDCS(anodal)) applied to the primary somatosensory cortex (S1) can lead to behavioral changes in performance of tactile discriminative tasks. METHODS: Using an accurate tactile discrimination task (grating orientation task: GOT) we tested the hypothesis that application of 1mA of tDCS(anodal) (current density at the electrodes of 0.04mA/cm2) over the left S1 can lead to an improved tactile spatial acuity in the contralateral index-finger (IF). RESULTS: Performance in the GOT task with the contralateral IF but not with the ipsilateral IF was enhanced for about 40min after a 20min application of tDCS(anodal) in the absence of changes with sham stimulation. CONCLUSIONS: These results provide the first evidence that tDCS(anodal) over S1 improves performance in a complex somatosensory task beyond the period of stimulation. SIGNIFICANCE: The ability to induce performance improvement in the somatosensory domain with tDCS applied over S1 could be used to promote functional recovery in patients with diminished tactile perception.     

Effects of anodal tDCS on lumbar propriospinal system in healthy subjects

ObjectiveIt has recently been shown that transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) (1) can modify lumbar spinal network excitability and (2) decreases cervical propriospinal system excitability. Thus the purpose of this series of experiments was to determine if anodal tDCS applied over the leg motor cortex area induces changes in lumbar propriospinal system excitability. To that end, the effects of anodal tDCS and sham tDCS on group I and group II propriospinal facilitation of quadriceps motoneurones were studied in healthy subjects.MethodsCommon peroneal nerve group I and group II quadriceps H-reflex facilitation was assessed in 15 healthy subjects in two randomised conditions: anodal tDCS condition and sham tDCS condition. Recordings were performed before, during and after the end of the cortical stimulation.ResultsCompared to sham, anodal tDCS decreases significantly CPN-induced group I and II quadriceps H-reflex facilitation during and also after the end of the cortical stimulation.ConclusionsAnodal tDCS induces (1) modulation of lumbar propriospinal system excitability (2) post-effects on spinal network.SignificanceThese results open a new vista to regulate propriospinal lumbar system excitability in patients and suggest that anodal tDCS would be interesting for neuro-rehabilitation of patients with central nervous system lesions.     

Direct current stimulation over the human sensorimotor cortex modulates the brain's hemodynamic response to tactile stimulation

Tactile stimuli produce afferent signals that activate specific regions of the cerebral cortex. Noninvasive transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) effectively modulates cortical excitability. We therefore hypothesised that a single session of tDCS targeting the sensory cortices would alter the cortical response to tactile stimuli. This hypothesis was tested with a block‐design functional magnetic resonance imaging protocol designed to quantify the blood oxygen level‐dependent response to controlled sinusoidal pressure stimulation applied to the right foot sole, as compared with rest, in 16 healthy young adults. Following sham tDCS, right foot sole stimulation was associated with activation bilaterally within the precentral cortex, postcentral cortex, middle and superior frontal gyri, temporal lobe (subgyral) and cingulate gyrus. Activation was also observed in the left insula, middle temporal lobe, superior parietal lobule, supramarginal gyrus and thalamus, as well as the right inferior parietal lobule and claustrum (false discovery rate corrected, P < 0.05). To explore the regional effects of tDCS, brain regions related to somatosensory processing, and cortical areas underneath each tDCS electrode, were chosen as regions of interest. Real tDCS, as compared with sham tDCS, increased the percent signal change associated with foot stimulation relative to rest in the left posterior paracentral lobule. These results indicate that tDCS acutely modulated the cortical responsiveness to controlled foot pressure stimuli in healthy adults. Further study is warranted, in both healthy individuals and patients with sensory impairments, to link tDCS‐induced modulation of the cortical response to tactile stimuli with changes in somatosensory perception.     

Premotor transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) affects primary motor excitability in humans

Recent studies have shown that repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) over the premotor cortex (PM) modifies the excitability of the ipsilateral primary motor cortex (M1). Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a new method to induce neuroplasticity in humans non-invasively. tDCS generates neuroplasticity directly in the cortical area under the electrode, but might also induce effects in distant brain areas, caused by activity modulation of interconnected areas. However, this has not yet been tested electrophysiologically. We aimed to study whether premotor tDCS can modify the excitability of the ipsilateral M1 via cortico-cortical connectivity. Sixteen subjects received cathodal and anodal tDCS of the PM and eight subjects of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Premotor anodal, but not premotor cathodal or prefrontal tDCS, modified selectively short intracortical inhibition/intracortical facilitation (SICI/ICF), while motor thresholds, single test-pulse motor-evoked potential and input–output curves were stable throughout the experiments. Specifically, anodal tDCS decreased intracortical inhibition and increased paired-pulse excitability. The selective influence of premotor tDCS on intracortical excitability of the ipsilateral M1 suggests a connectivity-driven effect of tDCS on remote cortical areas. Moreover, this finding indirectly substantiates the efficacy of tDCS to modulate premotor excitability, which might be of interest for applications in diseases accompanied by pathological premotor activity.     

Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on working memory in patients with Parkinson's disease

OBJECTIVES: Cognitive impairment is a common feature in Parkinson's disease (PD) and is an important predictor of quality of life. Past studies showed that some aspects of cognition, such as working memory, can be enhanced following dopaminergic therapy and transcranial magnetic stimulation. The aim of our study was to investigate whether another form of noninvasive brain stimulation, anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), which increases cortical excitability, is associated with a change in a working memory task performance in PD patients. METHODS: We studied 18 patients (12 men and 6 women) with idiopathic PD. The patients performed a three-back working memory task during active anodal tDCS of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (LDLPFC), anodal tDCS of the primary motor cortex (M1) or sham tDCS. In addition, patients underwent two different types of stimulation with different intensities: 1 and 2 mA. RESULTS: The results of this study show a significant improvement in working memory as indexed by task accuracy, after active anodal tDCS of the LDLPFC with 2 mA. The other conditions of stimulation: sham tDCS, anodal tDCS of LDLPFC with 1 mA or anodal tDCS of M1 did not result in a significant task performance change. CONCLUSION: tDCS may exert a beneficial effect on working memory in PD patients that depends on the intensity and site of stimulation. This effect might be explained by the local increase in the excitability of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex.     

Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation coupled with repetitive electrical stimulation on cortical spreading depression

We have recently shown that two techniques of brain stimulation - repetitive electrical stimulation (ES) (that mimics transcranial magnetic stimulation) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) - modify the velocity of cortical spreading depression (CSD) significantly. Herein we aimed to study the effects of these two techniques combined on CSD. Thirty-two Wistar rats were divided into four groups according to the treatment: sham tDCS/sham ES, sham tDCS/1 Hz ES, anodal tDCS/1 Hz ES, cathodal tDCS/1 Hz ES. Our findings show that 1 Hz ES reduced CSD velocity, and this effect was modified by either anodal or cathodal tDCS. Anodal tDCS induced larger effects than cathodal tDCS. Hereby CSD velocity was actually increased significantly after anodal tDCS/1 Hz ES. Our results show that combining two techniques of brain stimulation can modify significantly the effects of ES alone on cortical excitability as measured by the neurophysiological parameter of cortical spreading depression and therefore provide important insights into the effects of this new approach of brain stimulation on cortical activity.     

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Effects on the Excitability of Corticospinal Axons of the Human Cerebral Cortex

BackgroundTranscranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) of the human cerebral cortex modulates cortical excitability non-invasively in a polarity-specific manner: anodal tDCS leads to lasting facilitation of motor cortex excitability.ObjectiveTo further elucidate the underlying physiological mechanisms of tDCS.MethodsWe recorded corticospinal volleys evoked by single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation of the primary motor cortex before and after a 20 min period of anodal tDCS in a conscious patient who had electrode implanted in the cervical epidural space for the control of pain. We performed magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex using a direction of the induced current in the brain capable of activating both corticospinal axons, evoking D-wave activity, and cortico-cortical axons projecting upon corticospinal cells, evoking I-wave activity.ResultsAnodal tDCS increased the excitability of cortical circuits generating both D and I-wave activity, with a more prolonged effect on D-wave activity. The changes in motor evoked potential recorded from hand muscles produced by tDCS were in agreement with the effects produced on intracortical circuitry.ConclusionsEpidural recordings of corticospinal activity in our patient indicate that anodal tDCS develops its facilitatory effects by an increase in the excitability of corticospinal axons and by an increase of activity in cortico-cortical projections onto pyramidal tract neurones, modulating motor cortex excitability with both synaptic (I waves) and non-synaptic (D waves) mechanisms.     

Current intensity‐ and polarity‐specific online and aftereffects of transcranial direct current stimulation: An fMRI study

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) induces polarity‐ and dose‐dependent neuroplastic aftereffects on cortical excitability and cortical activity, as demonstrated by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and functional imaging (fMRI) studies. However, lacking systematic comparative studies between stimulation‐induced changes in cortical excitability obtained from TMS, and cortical neurovascular activity obtained from fMRI, prevent the extrapolation of respective physiological and mechanistic bases. We investigated polarity‐ and intensity‐dependent effects of tDCS on cerebral blood flow (CBF) using resting‐state arterial spin labeling (ASL‐MRI), and compared the respective changes to TMS‐induced cortical excitability (amplitudes of motor evoked potentials, MEP) in separate sessions within the same subjects (n = 29). Fifteen minutes of sham, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0‐mA anodal or cathodal tDCS was applied over the left primary motor cortex (M1) in a randomized repeated‐measure design. Time‐course changes were measured before, during and intermittently up to 120‐min after stimulation. ROI analyses indicated linear intensity‐ and polarity‐dependent tDCS after‐effects: all anodal‐M1 intensities increased CBF under the M1 electrode, with 2.0‐mA increasing CBF the greatest (15.3%) compared to sham, while all cathodal‐M1 intensities decreased left M1 CBF from baseline, with 2.0‐mA decreasing the greatest (?9.3%) from sham after 120‐min. The spatial distribution of perfusion changes correlated with the predicted electric field, as simulated with finite element modeling. Moreover, tDCS‐induced excitability changes correlated more strongly with perfusion changes in the left sensorimotor region compared to the targeted hand‐knob region. Our findings reveal lasting tDCS‐induced alterations in cerebral perfusion, which are dose‐dependent with tDCS parameters, but only partially account for excitability changes.     

Modifying somatosensory processing with non-invasive brain stimulation

Purposeful manipulation of cortical plasticity and excitability within somatosensory regions may have therapeutic potential. Non-invasive brain stimulation (NBS) techniques such as transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) or transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) have shown promise towards this end with certain NBS protocols augmenting somatosensory processing and others down-regulating it. Here, we review NBS protocols which, when applied to primary somatosensory cortex, facilitate cortical excitability and tactile acuity (i.e., high-frequency repetitive TMS (rTMS), intermittent theta burst stimulation (TBS), paired associative stimulation (PAS) N20-5 to 0, anodal tDCS), and protocols that inhibit the same (i.e., low-frequency rTMS, continuous TBS, PAS N20-20, cathodal tDCS). Other studies have targeted multisensory regions of the brain to modulate somatosensory processing. These studies in full present a wide array of strategies in which NBS can be utilized to influence somatosensory processing in a behaviorally and clinically relevant capacity.     

Modulation of decision‐making in a gambling task in older adults with transcranial direct current stimulation

Cognitive performance usually declines in older adults as a result of neurodegenerative processes. One of the cognitive domains usually affected is decision‐making. Based on our recent findings suggesting that non‐invasive brain stimulation can improve decision‐making in young participants, we studied whether bifrontal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) applied over the right and left prefrontal cortex of older adult subjects can change balance of risky and safe responses as it can in younger individuals. Twenty‐eight subjects (age range from 50 to 85 years) performed a gambling risk task while receiving either anodal tDCS over the right and cathodal tDCS over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), anodal tDCS over the left with cathodal tDCS over the right DLPFC, or sham stimulation. Our main finding was a significant group effect showing that participants receiving left anodal/right cathodal stimulation chose more often high‐risk prospects as compared with participants receiving sham or those receiving right anodal/left cathodal stimulation. This result is contrary to previous findings in young subjects, suggesting that modulation of cortical activity in young and elderly results in opposite behavioral effects; thus supporting fundamental changes in cognitive processing in the elderly.