随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、多中心研究唑尼沙胺添加用药治疗部分性癫(癎)发作的有效性和安全性

目的 评价唑尼沙胺(ZNS)作为添加用药治疗部分性癫(癎)发作的有效性和安全性.方法 采用多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、平行组、添加治疗设计.240例确诊为癫(癎)部分性发作的受试者按照1:1的比例随机分配到ZNS治疗组或安慰剂组.在前4周加鼋期内受试者自100 mg/d逐渐加量至300 mg/d,随后进入12周的稳定治疗期.在稳定期内可根据患者情况酌情减量,或加量至最大剂量400 mg/d.有效性评价的主要指标为稳定期部分性癫(癎)发作频率较基线值减少百分数的中位值,重要的次要评价指标为有效率,即部分性癫(癎)发作次数减少≥50%者的比例.同时对药物的安全性进行评价.结果 ZNS组受试者稳定期部分性癫(癎)发作频率较基线期减少百分数(48.4%)显著高于安慰剂组(26.6%),组间差异有统计学意义(F=4.904,P=0.028);ZNS组治疗部分性癫(癎)发作的有效率(48.6%)高于安慰剂组(34.9%),差异有统计学意义(X2=4.046,P=0.044),其中以复杂部分性癫(癎)的组间差异最为显著(分别为52.2%和33.3%,X2=5.607,P=0.018).ZNS组与安慰剂组不良事件发生率相当,与ZNS相关的不良事件多为头晕、头痛、嗜睡、食欲下降、恶心等.结论 ZNS能有效治疗部分性癫(癎),降低癫(癎)发作频率,对复杂部分性癫(癎)发作治疗效果尤为突出.ZNS耐受性良好,受试者用药安全性较高.     

多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照评价唑尼沙胺添加治疗癫(癎)部分性发作的疗效和安全性

目的 评价唑尼沙胺作为添加治疗癫(癎)部分性发作的疗效和安全性.方法 确诊为有癫(癎)部分性发作的217例癫(癎)患者,随机分配入唑尼沙胺治疗组(n=111)与安慰剂组(n=106)进行随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、多中心平行设计添加治疗.在3个月回顾性基线期后,给予患者初始剂量唑尼沙胺(100 mg/片)或安慰剂每次1片,每日1次口服,4周内递增至每次2片,每日2次.分别在治疗0、2、4、8、12和16周时进行随访.主要疗效指标为治疗结束后与基线期比较发作次数减少的中位百分比;次要疗效指标为发作次数减少大于50%的比例.同时观察研究药物的安全性与不良反应情况.结果 总发作次数减少率中位数在唑尼沙胺组为33.33%,安慰剂组为0;唑尼沙胺组总发作次数减少>50%者38例(34.23%),安慰剂组21例(19.81%),差异有统计学意义(χ3=5.7159,P=0.0168).唑尼沙胺组治疗后无发作13例(11.71%),有效25例(22.52%),临床有效率为34.23%;安慰剂组无发作5例(4.72%),有效16例(15.09%),临床有效率为19.81%,2组间比较差异有统计学意义(U=2.4701,P=0.0135).唑尼沙胺组与安慰剂组比较,其不良反应发生率差异无统计学意义,唑尼沙胺组较常见的不良反应有思睡、乏力、食欲下降、胃肠道不适、失眠和便秘.结论 唑尼沙胺作为部分性癫(癎)发作的添加药物有确定的疗效,安全耐受性较好,具有一定临床应用价值.     

Levetiracetam for partial seizures: results of a double-blind, randomized clinical trial

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of 500 mg bid and 1500 mg bid levetiracetam as adjunctive therapy for refractory partial seizures in a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicenter trial. METHODS: The authors studied patients with uncontrolled partial seizures (minimum 12 per 12 weeks), regardless of whether they became secondarily generalized, for 38 weeks. A 12-week baseline was followed by random assignment to adjunctive therapy with placebo (n = 95), levetiracetam 1000 mg/day (n = 98), or levetiracetam 3000 mg/day (n = 101). Upward titration over 4 weeks was followed by 14 weeks of fixed dose treatment, and concluded with an 8-week medication withdrawal period or entering a follow-up study. RESULTS: Of 294 patients randomized, 268 completed the study. Partial seizure frequency during the entire evaluation period (primary efficacy variable) was lower with levetiracetam compared to placebo (p /=10%), mostly mild to moderate in severity, with incidences higher than placebo were asthenia, dizziness, flu syndrome, headache, infection, rhinitis, and somnolence. CONCLUSION: Adjunctive therapy with levetiracetam was effective and well tolerated in controlling partial seizures.     

Pregabalin As Adjunctive Therapy for Partial Seizures

Summary:  The efficacy and safety of pregabalin as adjunctive therapy for patients with partial epilepsy with or without secondary generalization has been studied in three randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials involving 1,052 patients. Patients (≥12 years of age) participating in the trials were highly refractory to treatment, experiencing at least six seizures and no 4-week seizure-free period during the 8-week baseline phase, even though 73% received at least two antiepileptic drugs and 23% received three. Each fixed-dose study was 12 weeks in duration. In Study 1, patients received pregabalin 50, 150, 300, or 600 mg/day given two times daily with no titration period. Studies 2 and 3 had a 1-week titration to dose levels of 150 and 600 mg/day given three times daily (Study 2), 600 mg/day given two times daily, and 600 mg/day given three times daily (Study 3). Pregabalin, at 150, 300, and 600 mg/day, was significantly superior to placebo in reducing seizure frequency with a clear dose–response relationship. Responder rates, defined as the percentage of patients with ≥50% reduction in seizure frequency from baseline, approached 50% at 600 mg/day. In the effective dose range (150–600 mg/day), seizure freedom in the last 28 days of treatment was 3–17%. There was no difference between two times daily and three times daily dosing regimens. Efficacy was apparent as early as week one. The most commonly reported adverse events were CNS related, and either mild or moderate in intensity and generally self limiting. Few patients (≤5% in any treatment group) discontinued due to lack of efficacy. These results indicate that pregabalin is highly effective as adjunctive therapy in the treatment of patients with partial seizures with or without secondary generalization.     

唑尼沙胺添加治疗部分性癫的临床疗效及安全性:多中心随机双盲安慰剂对照研究

目的观察唑尼沙胺分散片添加治疗部分性发作或继发全面性发作、全面性强直-阵挛发作及失神发作的疗效及安全性。方法 240例诊断明确的部分性发作患者,被随机分为唑尼沙胺组(120例)或对照组(120例)。回顾性基线期(12周)后,予初始剂量唑尼沙胺或安慰剂100mg/次,1次/d,3周内递增至100 mg/次,3次/d;分别在治疗第0、2、4、8和16周时进行随访,评价治疗第5～16周时临床综合疗效的完全控制率和总有效率,以及药物安全性和不良反应。结果治疗第5～16周时,唑尼沙胺组患者癫癎完全控制率为34.04%(32/94)、总有效率74.47%(70/94),对照组分别为13.08%(14/107)和42.99%(46/107);两组临床综合疗效的完全控制率和总有效率比较,差异具有统计学意义(均P=0.000)。唑尼沙胺组患者常见药物不良反应包括食欲不振、嗜睡、疲劳、头晕、肝功能异常等,与对照组不良反应发生率比较差异有统计学意义(P=0.003)。结论唑尼沙胺作为添加药物治疗部分性发作或继发全面性发作、全面性强直-阵挛发作的疗效优于安慰剂,而且有较好的安全性和耐受性,是临床可以选择的新型抗癫癎药物之一。     

Rufinamide for the adjunctive treatment of partial seizures in adults and adolescents: A randomized placebo-controlled trial

Purpose:   To evaluate efficacy and safety of adjunctive treatment with rufinamide 1600 mg twice daily in subjects aged ≥16 years with refractory partial seizures.
Methods:   This double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, parallel-group, multicenter trial included an 8-week baseline phase and a 13-week double-blind phase. Treatment was initiated with rufinamide 400 mg twice daily or placebo; rufinamide was titrated to 1600 mg twice daily. Percentage change in partial seizure frequency was the primary outcome measure. Secondary outcome measures included total partial seizure frequency and the percentage of subjects experiencing a ≥50% reduction in partial seizure frequency.
Results:   Three hundred thirteen subjects were randomized; 156 subjects received rufinamide and 157 received placebo. Rufinamide-treated subjects experienced a 20.4% median reduction in partial seizure frequency relative to baseline, while placebo-treated subjects had an increase of 1.6% (p = 0.02). Exclusion of subjects taking carbamazepine in a post hoc analysis resulted in a reduction of 29.2% versus 0.7% in the placebo group (p = 0.05), whereas the treatment difference in subjects taking carbamazepine was not significant. Of rufinamide-treated subjects, 28.2% experienced a ≥50% decrease in partial seizure frequency versus 18.6% of placebo-treated subjects (p = 0.04). The most common adverse events associated with rufinamide treatment were dizziness, nausea, diplopia, and ataxia; they occurred primarily during the titration phase.
Discussion:   Adjunctive therapy with rufinamide 3200 mg/day compared with matching placebo demonstrated efficacy and was generally well tolerated in adults with partial seizures. Further study of this agent in adults with partial seizures taking a range of baseline AEDs is warranted.     

Adjunctive lamotrigine XR for primary generalized tonic-clonic seizures in a randomized, placebo-controlled study

Efficacy and tolerability of once-daily adjunctive lamotrigine extended-release (XR) for primary generalized tonic-clonic (PGTC) seizures in epilepsy were evaluated. Patients (n = 153) ≥ 13 years old diagnosed with epilepsy with PGTC seizures were randomized to once-daily adjunctive lamotrigine XR or placebo in a double-blind, parallel-group trial comprising a baseline phase, a 7-week double-blind escalation phase, and a 12-week double-blind maintenance phase. Lamotrigine XR was more effective than placebo with respect to median percentage reduction from baseline in weekly PGTC seizure frequency (primary endpoint-19-week treatment phase: 75.4% vs 32.1%, P<0.0001; escalation phase: 61.9% vs 30.6%, P = 0.0016; maintenance phase: 89.7% vs 33.3%, P<0.0001). Lamotrigine XR was more effective than placebo with respect to the percentage of patients with ≥50% reduction in PGTC seizure frequency. Significant separation from placebo for ≥50% reduction in PGTC seizures was observed beginning on treatment day 8. The most common adverse event was headache (lamotrigine XR 14%, placebo 16%).     

Efficacy and safety of levetiracetam in children with partial seizures: an open-label trial

PURPOSE: To assess the efficacy and safety of levetiracetam (LEV) as adjunctive therapy in children with treatment-resistant partial-onset seizures. METHODS: Children (aged 6-12 years) with treatment-resistant partial-onset seizures receiving one standard antiepileptic drug (AED) were eligible. After a 4-week baseline period, children received LEV in a 6-week titration phase (target dose, 40 mg/kg/day) followed by an 8-week evaluation phase. Seizure frequency during the evaluation period with individualized LEV doses (20-40 mg/kg/day) were compared with the 4-week baseline seizure frequency. Plasma concentrations of LEV and other AEDs were determined to evaluate potential drug interactions. RESULTS: Twenty-four subjects enrolled and received LEV; 23 entered the evaluation phase, and 22 completed the evaluation phase. Compared with their baseline seizure frequency, 12 (52%) of 23 subjects entering the evaluation phase had their seizure frequency decrease by >50%. Two subjects remained seizure free during the entire evaluation period. LEV did not significantly affect plasma concentrations of any concomitant AED during this study, and no alteration of mean clinical laboratory values was observed. The most commonly reported adverse events were headache, infection, anorexia, and somnolence. CONCLUSIONS: This open-label study of adjunctive LEV therapy (at 20-40 mg/kg/day) suggests that LEV is effective, safe, and well tolerated in children ages 6-12 years with treatment-resistant partial-onset seizures. A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial of LEV adjunctive therapy in children with treatment-resistant partial-onset seizures is needed and ongoing to confirm these open-label findings.     

唑尼沙胺添加治疗部分性癫癎的临床疗效及安全性：多中心随机双盲安慰剂对照研究

目的观察唑尼沙胺分散片添加治疗部分性发作或继发全面性发作、全面性强直一阵挛发作及失神发作的疗效及安全性。方法240例诊断明确的部分性发作患者,被随机分为唑尼沙胺组（120例）或对照组（120例）。回顾性基线期（12周）后,予初始剂量唑尼沙胺或安慰剂100mg／次,1次,d,3周内递增至100mg/次,3次/d;分别在治疗第0、2、4、8和16周时进行随访,评价治疗第5～16周时临床综合疗效的完全控制率和总有效率,以及药物安全性和不良反应。结果治疗第5～16周时,唑尼沙胺组患者癫痼完全控制率为34．04％（32／94）、总有效率74．47％（70／94）,对照组分别为13．08％（14／107）和42．99％（46／107）;两组临床综合疗效的完全控制率和总有效率比较,差异具有统计学意义（均P=0．000）。唑尼沙胺组患者常见药物不良反应包括食欲不振、嗜睡、疲劳、头晕、肝功能异常等,与对照组不良反应发生率比较差异有统计学意义（P=0．003）。结论唑尼沙胺作为添加药物治疗部分性发作或继发全面性发作、全面性强直一阵挛发作的疗效优于安慰剂,而且有较好的安全性和耐受性,是临床可以选择的新型抗癫癎药物之一。     

Low-dose topiramate in adults with treatment-resistant partial-onset seizures

OBJECTIVES: Based on dose predictions from animal and human volunteer studies, most patients enrolled in initial randomized controlled trials of topiramate as adjunctive therapy in adults with partial-onset seizures were randomized to >or= 600 mg/day topiramate. Subsequent experience suggests that dosage needs were overestimated. This double-blind, placebo-controlled study evaluated 200 mg/day topiramate in adults with treatment-resistant partial-onset seizures receiving a concurrent enzyme-inducing antiepileptic agent (carbamazepine). MATERIALS AND METHODS: After a 4-week baseline, 263 adults receiving carbamazepine who had at least three partial-onset seizures during the baseline period were randomized to placebo or one of two topiramate 200 mg/day treatment arms: topiramate escalated weekly 25 mg/day(8-week escalation) or 50 mg/day(4-week escalation). Therapy was then maintained for the remainder of the 12-week double-blind study. RESULTS: Median percent reduction in seizure frequency from baseline to study end was 44% with topiramate and 20% with placebo (P or=10% incidence in topiramate-treated patients) were somnolence, fatigue, paresthesia, nervousness and anorexia; 8% of topiramate-treated patients and 2% of placebo-treated patients discontinued because of adverse events. As a result of the low incidence of adverse events, differences between titration rates in terms of tolerability were not detected. CONCLUSION: Topiramate 200 mg/day is an appropriate target dose as adjunctive therapy in adults with treatment-resistant partial-onset seizures, even when receiving an enzyme-inducing agent; 100 mg/day also appears to be effective. A significant therapeutic effect may be seen in the second week of treatment with a dose of 100 mg/day.