MEG source estimation from mesio-basal temporal areas in a child with a porencephalic cyst

BACKGROUND: A child whose left temporal lobe contained mesial, anterior and basal structures but lacked superio-lateral cortex had intractable epilepsy secondary to a porencephalic cyst. Magnetoencephalography (MEG) shows equivalent current dipoles (ECDs) as dipole modeling for temporal lobe epilepsy rather than in an exact location. AIM: We hypothesized that the magnetic fields generated by the epileptic discharges in mesio-basal temporal areas could be detected by MEG without interference from the superio-lateral temporal cortices. METHODS: We analyzed MEG spikes using single dipole analysis and synthetic aperture magnetometry (SAM), and compared with EEG spike topography. RESULTS: Two MEG ECDs corresponding to T3 spikes localized to the anterior mesio-basal temporal region with vertical orientation. Sixteen MEG ECDs corresponding to T5 spikes localized to the middle to posterior mesio-basal temporal region with vertical orientation. SAM revealed maximum current density at hippocampus and anterior fusiform gyrus for T3 spikes, and at posterior hippocampus and fusiform gyrus for T5 spikes. CONCLUSION: Vertically oriented ECDs were obtained without superio-lateral temporal cortices because of temporo-parieto-occipital porencephalic cyst. The absence of superio-lateral temporal cortices, prominent temporal EEG spikes, less prominent MEG spikes, and mesio-basal SAM spikes indicated that the vertically oriented ECDs were projected directly from the mesio-basal temporal region.     

Interictal and ictal magnetoencephalographic study in patients with medial frontal lobe epilepsy

PURPOSE: To determine whether magnetoencephalography (MEG) has any clinical value for the analysis of seizure discharges in patients with medial frontal lobe epilepsy (FLE). METHODS: Four patients were studied with 74-channel MEG. Interictal and ictal electroencephalographic (EEG) and MEG recordings were obtained. The equivalent current dipoles (ECDs) of the MEG spikes were calculated. RESULTS: In two patients with postural seizures, interictal EEG spikes occurred at Cz or Fz. The ECDs of interictal MEG spikes were localized around the supplementary motor area. In the other two patients with focal motor or oculomotor seizures, interictal EEG spikes occurred at Fz or Cz. The ECDs of interictal MEG spikes were localized at the top of the medial frontal region. The ECDs detected at MEG ictal onset were also localized in the same area as those of the interictal discharges. CONCLUSIONS: In medial FLE patients, interictal and ictal MEG indicated consistent ECD localization that corresponded to the semiology of clinical seizures. Our findings demonstrate that MEG is a useful tool for detecting epileptogenic focus.     

Ictal magnetoencephalographic study in a patient with ring 20 syndrome

OBJECTIVE: To report the ictal magnetoencephalography (MEG) in a patient with ring chromosome 20 mosaicism, a rare chromosomal anomaly associated with intractable epilepsy. METHODS: MEG and simultaneous EEG were recorded with a 204 channel whole head MEG system. Ten habitual seizures occurred during the acquisition, which was done twice. The equivalent current dipoles (ECDs) for ictal discharges on MEG were calculated using a single dipole model. The ECDs were superimposed on a magnetic resonance image. RESULTS: During the seizures, EEG showed prolonged bursts of 5-6 Hz high voltage slow waves with spike components, dominantly in the bilateral frontal region. MEG showed epileptiform discharges corresponding to the ictal EEG. Ictal discharges on MEG were dominant in the frontal area in the initial portion, and then spread in the bilateral temporal area in the middle of the seizure. ECDs obtained from the spikes of the initial portion were clustered in the medial frontal lobe. CONCLUSIONS: The source of the ictal MEG was localised in the medial frontal lobe. The findings suggest that the mechanism underlying epilepsy in this case might be similar to medial frontal lobe epilepsy. Ictal MEG is a valuable tool for detecting the site of seizure onset.     

Application of magnetoencephalography in epilepsy patients with widespread spike or slow-wave activity

PURPOSE: To examine whether magnetoencephalography (MEG) can be used to determine patterns of brain activity underlying widespread paroxysms of epilepsy patients, thereby extending the applicability of MEG to a larger population of epilepsy patients. METHODS: We studied two children with symptomatic localization-related epilepsy. Case 1 had widespread spikes in EEG with an operation scar from a resection of a brain tumor; Case 2 had hemispheric slow-wave activity in EEG with sensory auras. MEG was collected with a 204-channel helmet-shaped sensor array. Dynamic statistical parametric maps (dSPMs) were constructed to estimate the cortical distribution of interictal discharges for these patients. Equivalent current dipoles (ECDs) also were calculated for comparison with the results of dSPM. RESULTS: In case 1 with widespread spikes, dSPM presented the major activity at the vicinity of the operation scar in the left frontal lobe at the peak of the spikes, and some activities were detected in the left temporal lobe just before the peak in some spikes. In case 2 with hemispheric slow waves, the most active area was located in the left parietal lobe, and additional activity was seen at the ipsilateral temporal and frontal lobes in dSPM. The source estimates correlated well with the ictal manifestation and interictal single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) findings for this patient. In comparison with the results of ECDs, ECDs could not express a prior activity at the left temporal lobe in case 1 and did not model well the MEG data in case 2. CONCLUSIONS: We suggest that by means of dSPM, MEG is useful for presurgical evaluation of patients, not only with localized epileptiform activity, but also with widespread spikes or slow waves, because it requires no selections of channels and no time-point selection.     

Magnetoencephalographic Analysis of Secondary Bilateral Synchrony

To assess the clinical value of magnetoencephalography (MEG) in investigating the origin of secondary bilateral synchrony (SBS) in patients with partial epilepsy. MEG and simultaneous electroencephalography (EEG) were recorded with a 204-channel whole-head MEG system in 2 patients. The equivalent current dipoles (ECDs) for epileptic discharges on MEG were calculated according to a single dipole model. In patient 1, the ictal EEG showed bursts of bilateral synchronous 3-Hz spike-and-slow-wave complexes. ECDs obtained from the ictal MEG localized to the right medial frontal lobe. On the second patient's MEG recordings, epileptic discharges corresponding to prolonged EEG bursts of bilateral synchronous spike-and-slow-wave complexes were obtained. ECDs calculated from the prolonged bursts were clustered in the left medial frontal lobe. MEG detected the sources of SBS in the medial frontal lobe. MEG is extremely useful for the identification of the source of SBS.     

Magnetoencephalography to confirm epileptiform discharges mimicking small sharp spikes in temporal lobe epilepsy

ObjectiveTo determine whether magnetoencephalography (MEG) can identify epileptiform discharges mimicking small sharp spikes (SSSs) on scalp electroencephalography (EEG) in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE).MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed simultaneous scalp EEG and MEG recordings of 83 consecutive patients with TLE and 49 with extra-TLE (ETLE).ResultsSSSs in scalp EEG were detected in 15 (18.1%) of 83 TLE patients compared to only two (4.1%) of 49 ETLE patients (p = 0.029). Five of the 15 TLE patients had MEG spikes with concurrent SSSs in EEG, but neither of the 2 ETLE patients. Three of these 5 TLE patients had additional interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs) in EEG and MEG. Equivalent current dipoles (ECDs) of MEG spikes with concurrent SSSs and IEDs showed no difference in temporal lobe localization and horizontal orientation, whereas ECD moments were smaller in MEG spikes with concurrent SSSs than those with IEDs.ConclusionsSSSs were more common in TLE than in ETLE. At least some morphologically diagnosed SSSs are true but low-amplitude epileptiform discharges in TLE which can be identified with simultaneous MEG.SignificanceSimultaneous MEG is useful to identify epileptiform discharges mimicking SSSs in patients with TLE.     

Neuromagnetic source localization of epileptiform activity in patients with graphogenic epilepsy

PURPOSE: To clarify the source localization of epileptiform activity by using magnetoencephalography (MEG) in patients with graphogenic epilepsy. METHODS: MEG and simultaneous EEG were recorded with a 204-channel whole-head MEG system in two patients with graphogenic epilepsy. During the MEG recordings, the patients performed a set of tasks comprising mental arithmetic calculation, speaking, moving the right arm in a manner resembling writing, writing, and thinking of writing. Equivalent current dipoles (ECD) were calculated for epileptiform discharges on MEG by using a single-dipole model. The ECD were superimposed on the magnetic resonance images of the patients. RESULTS: The task of writing provoked seizures, in which both patients jerked the right arms. Thinking of writing also induced these seizures. In both patients, EEG associated with the seizures showed bursts of spike-and-slow-wave complexes predominantly in the centroparietal region. MEG also showed epileptiform discharges corresponding to the EEG bursts. ECDs obtained from the discharges were clustered in the left centroparietal area. CONCLUSIONS: Thinking of writing was a trigger for the seizures, as well as the task of writing. The source of the epileptiform discharge associated with the seizures was localized in the unilateral centroparietal area. The findings suggest that the centroparietal region plays an important role in the pathophysiology underlying these two graphogenic epilepsy cases.     

High-resolution source imaging in mesiotemporal lobe epilepsy: a comparison between MEG and simultaneous EEG.

Magnetic source imaging is claimed to have a high accuracy in epileptic focus localization and may be a guide for epilepsy surgery. Non-lesional mesiotemporal lobe epilepsy (MTLE), the most common form of epilepsy operated on, has different etiologies, which may affect the choice of surgical approach. The authors compared whole-head magnetoencephalography (MEG) with high-resolution EEG for source identification in MTLE. Nineteen patients with unilateral, nonlesional MTLE underwent a simultaneous 151-channel CTF MEG (CTF Systems, Inc., Port Coquitlam, British Columbia, Canada) and 64-channel EEG recordings with sleep induction. Three independent observers selected spikes from the EEG and MEG recordings separately. Only when there was interobserver agreement (kappa>0.4) on the presence of spikes in recordings were consensus spikes averaged. EEG and MEG equivalent current dipoles (ECD) were then integrated in the head model of the patient reconstructed from MRI. The results were compared with intraoperative electrocorticography findings. Spikes were detected in 32% of MEGs and 42% of EEGs. No patient showed MEG spikes only. Equivalent current dipole modeling correctly localized the source to the temporal lobe in four out of five MEG and three out of eight EEG recordings. MEG localized sources were more superficial and EEG localized sources were deeper. Unfortunately, basal temporal lobe areas were only partially covered by the sensor helmet of the MEG setup. Best correlation between EEG or MEG findings and electrocorticography findings was between horizontal EEG dipole orientation and prominent neocortical spiking; these patients also had a less favorable prognosis. Magnetic source imaging is currently unlikely to alter the surgical management of MTLE. The yield of spikes is too low, and ECD modeling shows only partial correlation with electrocorticography findings. Moreover, the whole-head MEG helmet provides insufficient coverage of the temporal lobe.     

Epileptic spikes: magnetoencephalography versus simultaneous electrocorticography

PURPOSE: To test the sensitivity of extracranial magnetoencephalography (MEG) for epileptic spikes in different cerebral sites. METHODS: We simultaneously recorded MEG and electrocorticography (ECoG) by using subdural electrodes with 1-cm interelectrode distances for one patient with lateral frontal epilepsy and one patient with basal temporal epilepsy. We analyzed MEG spikes associated with ECoG spikes and compared the maximal amplitude and number of electrodes involved. We estimated and evaluated the locations and moments of the equivalent current dipoles (ECDs) of MEG spikes. RESULTS: In patient 1, MEG detected 100 (53%) of 188 ECoG lateral frontal spikes, including 31 (46%) of 67 spikes that activated three subdural electrodes. MEG spike amplitudes correlated with ECoG spike amplitudes and the number of electrodes activated (p < 0.01). ECDs were perpendicular to the superior frontal sulcus. In patient 2, MEG detected 31 (26%) of 121 ECoG basal temporal spikes, but none that activated only three subdural electrodes. ECDs were localized in the entorhinal and parahippocampal gyri, oriented perpendicular to those basal temporal cortical surfaces. The ECD strength was 136.6 +/- 71.5 nAm in the frontal region, but 274.5 +/- 150.6 nAm in the temporal region (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: When lateral frontal ECoG spikes extend >3 cm2 across the fissure, MEG can detect >50%, correlating with spatial activation and voltage. In the basal temporal region, MEG requires higher-amplitude discharges over a more extensive area. MEG shows a significantly higher sensitivity to lateral convexity epileptic discharges than to discharges in isolated deep basal temporal regions.     

Neuromagnetic separation of secondarily bilateral synchronized spike foci: report of three cases.

To demonstrate the high spatiotemporal resolution of magnetoencephalography (MEG), we report three cases with focal epilepsy that exhibited bilateral synchronized spikes on simultaneous scalp EEG and MEG recording. Constant time lags (19.4 +/- 3.0 ms and 20.0 +/- 5.5) between the leading and the following contralateral spikes were noted on MEG and the current dipole sources were localized in the bilateral homotopic regions symmetrically in Cases 1 and 3. In Case 2, MEG indicated leading spikes in the left frontal region, with a time lag of 42.3 +/- 8.4 ms to reach the contralateral frontal and bilateral temporal regions as well. Chronic subdural EEG recording in Cases 1 and 2 confirmed that the leading spike focus in MEG was close to the seizure onset zone in cortical EEG. Spatio-temporal analysis of MEG spikes may be useful to identify the primary epileptic region in patients with synchronized bilateral epileptiform discharges.     

Magnetoencephalography in partial epilepsy: Clinical yield and localization accuracy

The goals of this study were to determine (1) the yield of magnetoencephalography (MEG) according to epilepsy type, (2) if MEG spike sources colocalize with focal epileptogenic pathology, and (3) if MEG can identify the epileptogenic zone when scalp ictal electroencephalogram (EEG) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) fail to localize it. Twenty-two patients with mesial temporal (10 patients), neocortical temporal (3 patients), and extratemporal lobe epilepsy (9 patients) were studied. A 37-channel biomagnetometer was used for simultaneously recording MEG with EEG. During the typical 2–3–hour MEG recording session, interictal epileptiform activity was observed in 16 of 22 patients. MEG localization yield was greater in patients with neocortical epilepsy (92%) than in those with mesial temporal lobe epilepsy (50%). In 5 of 6 patients with focal epileptogenic pathology, MEG spike sources were colocalized with the lesions. In 11 of 12 patients with nonlocalizing (ambiguous abnormalities or normal) MRI, MEG spike sources were localized in the region of the epileptogenic zone as ultimately defined by all clinical and EEG information (including intracranial EEG). In conclusion, MEG can reliably localize sources of spike discharges in patients with temporal and extratemporal lobe epilepsy. MEG sometimes provides noninvasive localization data that are not otherwise available with MRI or conventional scalp ictal EEG.     

Magnetoencephalographic study of rhythmic mid-temporal discharges in non-epileptic and epileptic patients.

To evaluate the source location and clinical significance of rhythmic mid-temporal theta discharges (RMTD) by MEG in non-epileptic and epileptic patients, we conducted simultaneous MEG and EEG recordings with a whole-scalp 306-channel neuromagnetometer in three patients: one with right temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE), one with right frontal lobe epilepsy (FLE), and one with tension headache. We visually detected the RMTD activity and interictal spikes, and then localised their generators by MEG source modelling. We repeated MEG measurement 3 months after right anterior temporal lobectomy (ATL) in the TLE patient; 3 months after anticonvulsant medication in the FLE patient. In epileptic patients, RMTD activities were found during drowsiness over the left temporal channels of both MEG and EEG recordings, and their generators were localised to the left posterior inferior temporal region. In the patient with tension headache, RMTD was localised in the right inferior temporal area. When the epileptic patients became seizure free with disappearance of epileptic spikes, RMTD was still found over the left temporal channels. Besides, some bursts of RMTD appeared also in the right temporal channels in our TLE patient after ATL. Our results indicate that the source of RMTD activity is located in the fissural cortex of the posterior inferior temporal region. As a physiologic rhythm related to dampened vigilance, RMTD has no direct relation to epileptogenic activity.     

Dipole source localization of interictal epileptiform activity in temporal lobe epilepsy with medial temporal lesion

Dipole sources of interictal epileptiform activities recorded by conventional electroencephalogram (EEG) were estimated using the dipole tracing method. Four cases of temporal lobe epilepsy with medial temporal lesions were studied. Two patients with hippocampal sclerosis, one patient with granulation in the hippocampus and one patient with cavernous angioma were involved in the study. Interictal epileptiform activities were classified into two patterns according to the topography of spikes. They were widespread spikes over the parasagittal electrodes (parasagittal spikes) and restricted spikes at the temporal electrodes (temporal spikes). Dipole sources of parasagittal spikes were localized in the medio-basal temporal lobe with vertically orientated vector moment. Dipole sources of temporal spikes were localized in the medio-basal temporal lobe with horizontally orientated vector moment. Locations of dipoles and directions of vector moments were consistent with topography and polarity of spikes. The difference in the two patterns of interictal epileptiform activities was derived from the difference in the direction of the vector moment of dipole sources. There was no difference in the location of dipole sources. Both the dipole sources and the lesions were localized in the same medio-basal temporal lobe. Dipole tracing was very useful in localizing the dipole sources of interictal epileptiform activities and in understanding the neurophysiological background.     

Controversies in clinical neurophysiology. MEG is superior to EEG in the localization of interictal epileptiform activity: Con.

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether MEG is superior to scalp-EEG in the localization of interictal epileptiform activity and to stress the 'con' part in this controversy. METHODS: Advantages and disadvantages of the two techniques were systematically reviewed. RESULTS: While MEG and EEG complement each other for the detection of interictal epileptiform discharges, EEG offers the advantage of long-term recording significantly increasing its diagnostic yield which is not feasible with MEG. Localization accuracies of EEG and MEG are comparable once inaccuracies for the solution of the forward problem are eliminated. MEG may be more sensitive for the detection of neocortical spike sources. EEG and MEG source localizations show comparable agreement with invasive electrical recordings, can clarify the spatial relationship between the irritative zone and structural lesions, guide the placement of invasive electrodes and attribute epileptic activity to lobar subcompartments in temporal lobe epilepsy and to a lesser extent in extratemporal epilepsy. CONCLUSIONS: A clear superiority of MEG over EEG for the localization of interictal epileptiform activity cannot be derived from the studies presently available. SIGNIFICANCE: The combination of EEG and MEG provides information for the localization of interictal epileptiform activity which cannot be obtained with either technique alone.     

Spike orientation may predict epileptogenic side across cerebral sulci containing the estimated equivalent dipole.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether the orientation of interictal spikes, localized in major sulci by magnetoencephalography (MEG), predicts the epileptogenic side of the sulcal wall. METHODS: Sixteen epilepsy patients were analyzed in whom equivalent current dipoles (ECDs) of MEG spikes were localized on the central (four patients), interhemispheric (4), or sylvian fissure (8); and the epileptogenic side across the sulci had been confirmed by seizure semiology, structural lesions, or intracranial electroencephalography (EEG). ECD was classified as epileptogenic side or normal side oriented and correlated to the scalp EEG map. RESULTS: All central (n=50) and interhemispheric (n=83) spike ECDs were oriented toward the epileptogenic side at peak latency. In scalp EEG, 91% of the spikes showed radial pattern of broad negativity above the sulcus whereas 9% showed tangential pattern with positive maximum above the epileptogenic side. Sylvian spikes were only found in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE). In sylvian spikes (n=220), 73% of ECDs were oriented toward the epileptogenic side, whereas 27% were oriented toward the normal side. CONCLUSIONS: In central and interhemispheric spikes, epileptogenic side cortex may be gross surface negative through the sulcal wall to the adjacent gyrus. Inconsistent orientation of the sylvian spikes suggests a complex pattern of spike propagation in TLE. SIGNIFICANCE: ECD orientation of central and interhemispheric spikes in MEG may predict the epileptogenic side.     

Ictal magnetoencephalographic discharges from elementary visual hallucinations of status epilepticus

PURPOSE: To report the rare opportunity to study ictal magnetoencephalography (MEG) in a 26 year old man with simple partial status epilepticus that presented as elementary visual hallucinations (EVHs) in the right upper visual field. METHODS: The patient described his EVHs as "snowing on TV," "flickering lights," and "rotating coloured balls" that continued for several days. MEG and simultaneous EEG were recorded twice: during an episode of EVHs (ictal recordings) and after EVHs were controlled by medications (interictal recordings). RESULTS: During EVHs, MEG showed continuous periodic epileptiform discharges over the left posterior superior temporal region, while simultaneous EEG showed rhythmic theta waves and sporadic spikes over the left temporal region. The MEG discharge consisted of a three phase spike complex. Equivalent current dipoles (ECDs), modelled from spike complexes, localised in the left superior temporal area. After drug treatment controlled the EVHs, interictal MEG and EEG showed rare spikes over the same left temporal region. The average ictal ECD moment (mean (SD)) (128.7 (32.8 nAm)) was significantly weaker than the average interictal ECD moment (233.0 (63.9) nAm) (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The continuous, periodic, and clustered discharges seen on ictal MEG were the sources of EVH. The weaker ictal ECD sources were frequently not detected by scalp EEG, while the stronger interictal sources, presumably originating from an extensive interictal zone, were sufficiently large to be seen as EEG spikes.     

Focal magnetoencephalographic spikes in the superior temporal plane undetected by scalp EEG.

Temporal lobe spikes were detected by magnetoencephalography (MEG), but not by standard scalp electroencephalography (EEG), in a patient with intractable complex partial seizures. Simultaneous recording of scalp EEG and MEG revealed 2 different types of spike discharges: sporadic single spikes detected by both EEG and MEG which were localised diffusely in the right temporal lobe; and rhythmic MEG spike discharges that were not detected by scalp EEG, focally localised in the posterior part of the superior temporal plane. The tangential current orientation to the scalp may explain the different sensitivity of scalp EEG and MEG to rhythmic discharges. This study shows the unique sensitivity of MEG to epileptic activity in the superior temporal plane.     

Benefit of simultaneous recording of EEG and MEG in dipole localization

PURPOSE: In this study, we tried to show that EEG and magnetoencephalography (MEG) are clinically complementary to each other and that a combination of both technologies is useful for the precise diagnosis of epileptic focus. METHODS: We recorded EEGs and MEGs simultaneously and analyzed dipoles in seven patients with intractable localization-related epilepsy. MEG dipoles were analyzed by using a BTI Magnes 148-channel magnetometer. EEG dipoles were analyzed by using a realistically shaped four-layered head model (scalp-skull-fluid-brain) built from 2.0-mm slice magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) images. RESULTS: (a) In two of seven patients, MEG could not detect any epileptiform discharges, whereas EEG showed clear spikes. However, dipoles estimated from the MEG data corresponding to the early phase of EEG spikes clustered at a location close to that of the EEG-detected dipole. (b) In two of seven patients, EEG showed only intermittent high-voltage slow waves (HVSs) without definite spikes. However, MEG showed clear epileptiform discharges preceding these EEG-detected HVSs. Dipoles estimated for these EEG-detected HVSs were located at a location close to that of the MEG-detected dipoles. (c) Based on the agreement of the results of these two techniques, surgical resection was performed in one patient with good results. CONCLUSIONS: Dipole modeling of epileptiform activity by MEG and EEG sometimes provides information not obtainable with either modality used alone.     

Magnetoencephalography is more successful for screening and localizing frontal lobe epilepsy than electroencephalography

PURPOSE: The diagnosis of frontal lobe epilepsy may be compounded by poor electroclinical localization, due to distributed or rapidly propagating epileptiform activity. This study aimed at developing optimal procedures for localizing interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs) of patients with localization related epilepsy in the frontal lobe. To this end the localization results obtained for magnetoencephalography (MEG) and electroencephalography (EEG) were compared systematically using automated analysis procedures. METHODS: Simultaneous recording of interictal EEG and MEG was successful for 18 out of the 24 patients studied. Visual inspection of these recordings revealed IEDs with varying morphology and topography. Cluster analysis was used to classify these discharges on the basis of their spatial distribution followed by equivalent dipole analysis of the cluster averages. The locations of the equivalent dipoles were compared with the location of the epileptogenic lesions of the patient or, if these were not visible at MRI with the location of the interictal onset zones identified by subdural electroencephalography. RESULTS: Generally IEDs were more abundantly in MEG than in the EEG recordings. Furthermore, the duration of the MEG spikes, measured from the onset till the spike maximum, was in most patients shorter than the EEG spikes. In most patients, distinct spike subpopulations were found with clearly different topographical field maps. Cluster analysis of MEG spikes followed by dipole localization was successful (n = 14) for twice as many patients as for EEG source analysis (n = 7), indicating that the localizability of interictal MEG is much better than of interictal EEG. CONCLUSIONS: The automated procedures developed in this study provide a fast screening method for identifying the distinct categories of spikes and the brain areas responsible for these spikes. The results show that MEG spike yield and localization is superior compared with EEG. This finding is of importance for the diagnosis and preoperative evaluation of patients with frontal lobe epilepsy.