Value of fusion of PET and MRI for staging of endometrial cancer: Comparison with F-FDG contrast-enhanced PET/CT and dynamic contrast-enhanced pelvic MRI

Purpose

To investigate the diagnostic value of retrospective fusion of pelvic MRI and ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose (¹⁸F-FDG) PET images for assessment of locoregional extension and nodal staging of endometrial cancer.

Materials and methods

Thirty patients with biopsy-proven endometrial cancer underwent preoperative contrast-enhanced PET/CT (PET/ceCT) and pelvic dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for initial staging. Diagnostic performance of PET/ceCT, contrast-enhanced MRI, and retrospective image fusion from PET and MRI (fused PET/MRI) for assessing the extent of the primary tumor (T stage) and metastasis to regional LNs (N stage) was evaluated by two experienced readers. Histopathological and follow-up imaging results were used as the gold standard. The McNemar test was employed for statistical analysis.

Results

Fused PET/MRI and MRI detected 96.7% of the primary tumors, whereas PET/ceCT detected 93.3%. Accuracy for T status was 80.0% for fused PET/MRI, and MRI proved significantly more accurate than PET/ceCT, which had an accuracy of 60.0% (p = 0.041). Patient-based sensitivity, specificity and accuracy for detecting pelvic nodal metastasis were 100%, 96.3% and 96.7% for both fused PET/MRI and PET/ceCT, and 66.7%, 100% and 96.7% for MRI, respectively. These three parameters were not statistically significant (p = 1).

Conclusion

Fused PET/MRI, which complements the individual advantages of MRI and PET, is a valuable technique for assessment of the primary tumor and nodal staging in patients with endometrial cancer.     

Comparison of whole-body PET/CT and PET/MRI in breast cancer patients: Lesion detection and quantitation of 18F-deoxyglucose uptake in lesions and in normal organ tissues

Purpose

To compare the performance of PET/MRI imaging using MR attenuation correction (MRAC) (DIXON-based 4-segment -map) in breast cancer patients with that of PET/CT using CT-based attenuation correction and to compare the quantification accuracy in lesions and in normal organ tissues.

Methods

A total of 36 patients underwent a whole-body PET/CT scan 1 h after injection and an average of 62 min later a second scan using a hybrid PET/MRI system. PET/MRI and PET/CT were compared visually by rating anatomic allocation and image contrast. Regional tracer uptake in lesions was quantified using volumes of interest, and maximal and mean standardized uptake values (SUVmax and SUVmean, respectively) were calculated. Metabolic tumor volume (MTV) of each lesion was computed on PET/MRI and PET/CT. Tracer uptake in normal organ tissue was assessed as SUVmax and SUVmean in liver, spleen, left ventricular myocardium, lung, and muscle.

Results

Overall 74 FDG positive lesions were visualized by both PET/CT and PET/MRI. No significant differences in anatomic allocation scores were found between PET/CT and PERT/MRI, while contrast score of lesions on PET/MRI was significantly higher. Both SUVmax and SUVmean of lesions were significantly higher on PET/MRI than on PET/CT, with strong correlations between PET/MRI and PET/CT data (ρ = 0.71–0.88). MTVs of all lesions were 4% lower on PET/MRI than on PET/CT, but no statistically significant difference was observed, and an excellent correlation between measurements of MTV with PET/MRI and PET/CT was found (ρ = 0.95–0.97; p < 0.0001). Both SUVmax and SUVmean were significantly lower by PET/MRI than by PET/CT for lung, liver and muscle, no significant difference was observed for spleen, while either SUVmax and SUVmean of myocardium were significantly higher by PET/MRI. High correlations were found between PET/MRI and PET/CT for both SUVmax and SUVmean of the left ventricular myocardium (ρ = 0.91; p < 0.0001), while moderate correlations were found for the other normal organ tissues (ρ = 0.36–0.61; p < 0.05).

Conclusions

PET/MRI showed equivalent performance in terms of qualitative lesion detection to PET/CT. Despite significant differences in tracer uptake quantification, due to either methodological and biological factors, PET/MRI and PET/CT measurements in lesions and normal organ tissues correlated well. This study demonstrates that integrated whole-body PET/MRI is feasible in a clinical setting with high quality and in a short examination time.     

Depiction and characterization of liver lesions in whole body [F]-FDG PET/MRI

Objectives

To assess the value of PET/MRI with [¹⁸F]-FDG using a whole body protocol for the depiction and characterization of liver lesions in comparison to PET/CT.

Methods

70 patients (31 women, 39 men) with solid tumors underwent [¹⁸F]-FDG PET/CT and followed by an additional PET/MRI using an integrated scanner. Two readers rated the datasets (PET/CT; PET/MRI) regarding conspicuity of hepatic lesions (4-point ordinal scale) and diagnostic confidence (5-point ordinal scale). Median scores for lesion conspicuity and diagnostic confidence were compared using Wilcoxon's rank sum test. Prior examinations, histopathology and clinical follow-up (116 ± 54 days) served as standard of reference.

Results

36 of 70 (51%) patients showed liver lesions. Using PET/CT and PET/MRI all patients with liver metastases could correctly be identified. A total of 97 lesions were found (malignant n = 26; benign n = 71). For lesion conspicuity significantly higher scores were obtained for PET/MRI in comparison to PET/CT (p < 0.001). Significantly better performance for diagnostic confidence was observed in PET/MRI, both for malignant as for benign lesions (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

PET/MRI, even in the setting of a whole body approach, provides higher lesion conspicuity and diagnostic confidence compared to PET/CT and may therefore evolve as an attractive alternative in oncologic imaging.     

Potential impact of PET/CT on the initial staging of lymphoma

Purpose

The aim of this study was to investigate the potential impact of PET/CT on the initial staging of lymphoma with comparison to each of the PET and CT components alone.

Materials and methods

PET/CTs from 37 patients with lymphoma undergoing initial staging were studied. Review of PET, CT and PET/CT images were done and staging of each patient by each modality was assigned and compared together. Clinical follow-up, additional imaging and histology served as the standard of reference.

Results

PET/CT correctly diagnosed 83 nodal regions as positive for lymphomatous involvement versus 61 and 57 detected by PET and CT respectively. The respective sensitivities, specificities, and accuracies for the detection of nodal involvement were: PET: 88.4%, 65%, 94%, CT 89.1%, 60.1%, 96.1%, PET/CT 96.3%, 88.3%, 98.2%. PET/CT also correctly identified more extra-nodal lesions (n = 24) than CT (n = 16) and PET (n = 15). Correct staging was more accurate at PET/CT (n = 31) in comparison to PET alone (n = 23) and CT alone (n = 21).

Conclusions

PET/CT was superior to PET and CT in the initial staging of lymphoma with significant better performance compared to PET and CT to clarify nodal and extra-nodal involved sites. The application of PET/CT rather than CT or PET is likely to be more beneficial.     

Standardized uptake values for [F] FDG in normal organ tissues: Comparison of whole-body PET/CT and PET/MRI

Purpose

To compare maximum and mean standardized uptake values (SUVmax/mean) of normal organ tissues derived from [¹⁸F]-fluoro-desoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MRI) using MR attenuation correction (MRAC) (DIXON-based 4-segment μ-map) with [¹⁸F]-FDG positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) using CT-based attenuation correction (CTAC).

Methods and materials

In 25 oncologic patients (15 men, 10 women; age 57 ± 13 years) after routine whole-body FDG-PET/CT (60 min after injection of 290 ± 40 MBq [¹⁸F]-FDG) a whole-body PET/MRI was performed (Magnetom Biograph mMR™, Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany). Volumes of interest of 1.0 cm³ were drawn in 7 physiological organ sites in MRAC-PET and the corresponding CTAC-PET images manually. Spearman correlation coefficients were calculated to compare MRAC- and CTAC based SUV values; Wilcoxon-Matched-Pairs signed ranks test was performed to test for potential differences.

Results

The mean delay between FDG-PET/CT and PET/MRI was 92 ± 18 min. Excellent correlations of SUV values were found for the heart muscle (SUVmax/mean: R = 0.97/0.97); reasonably good correlations were found for the liver (R = 0.65/0.72), bone marrow (R = 0.42/0.41) and the SUVmax of the psoas muscle (R = 0.41). For subcutaneous fat, the correlation coefficient was 0.66 for SUVmean (p < 0.05). Correlations between MRAC and CTAC were non-significant for SUVmean of the psoas muscle, SUVmax of subcutaneous fat, SUVmax and SUVmean of the lungs, SUVmax and SUVmean of the blood-pool. The median SUVmax and SUVmean in MRAC-PET were lower than the respective CTAC values in all organs (p < 0.05) but heart (SUVmax) and the bone marrow (SUVmean).

Conclusion

In conclusion, in oncologic patients examined with PET/CT and PET/MRI SUVmax and SUVmean values generally correlate well in normal organ tissues, except the lung, subcutaneous fat and the blood pool. SUVmax and SUVmean derived from PET/MRI can be used reliably in clinical routine.     

Integrated PET/CT in the preoperative staging of lung cancer: A prospective comparison of CT,PET and integrated PET/CT

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the role of integrated PET/CT in the staging of lung cancer compared with CT alone or PET alone.

Materials and methods

Thirty-three patients underwent integrated PET/CT for the staging of lung cancer. The tumor, node and metastasis (TNM) stages were assessed with CT, PET and integrated PET–CT and compared with the surgical and pathological staging.

Results

CT correctly evaluated the (T) status in (64%) of the patients, PET in (59%) and PET/CT in (86%). CT correctly evaluated the (N) status in (73%) of the patients, PET in (76%), and PET/CT (88%) with accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV were 73%, 78%, 71%, 50% and 94% for CT, 76%, 67%, 79%, 55% and 95% for PET and 88%, 89%, 88%, 73% and 100% for PET/CT respectively, and for (M) status were 91%, 86%, 92%, 75% and 96% for CT, 88%, 71%, 92%, 71% and 92% for PET and 97%, 100%, 96%, 88% and 100% for PET/CT respectively. Regarding the overall TNM staging CT correctly staged 24 patients. PET correctly staged 23 cases while PET/CT correctly staged 30 cases. A significant difference in the accuracy of overall tumor staging between PET/CT and CT (P = 0.0412) or PET (P = 0.0233).

Conclusion

The integrated PET/CT is superior to either CT or PET in the staging of lung cancer which has an important impact on selection of the appropriate treatment regimen.     

Combined pre-treatment MRI and 18F-FDG PET/CT parameters as prognostic biomarkers in patients with cervical cancer

Objective

To determine the associations of quantitative parameters derived from multiphase contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CE-MRI), diffusion-weighted (DW) MRI and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron-emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) with clinico-histopathological prognostic factors, disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with cervical cancer.

Methods and materials

Our institutional review board approved this retrospective study of 49 patients (median age, 45 years) with histopathologically proven IB-IVB International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) cervical cancer who underwent pre-treatment pelvic MRI and whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT between February 2009 and May 2012. Maximum diameter (_maxTD), percentage enhancement (PE) and mean apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC_mean) of the primary tumor were measured on MRI. Maximum standardized uptake value (SUV_max), metabolic tumor volume (MTV), total lesion glycolysis (TLG) were measured on 18F-FDG PET/CT. Correlations between imaging metrics and clinico-histopathological parameters including revised 2009 FIGO stage, tumor histology, grade and lymph node (LN) metastasis at diagnosis were evaluated using the Wilcoxon rank sum test. Cox modeling was used to determine associations with DFS and OS.

Results

Median follow-up was 17 months. 41 patients (83.6%) were alive. 8 patients (16.3%) died of disease. Progression/recurrence occurred in 17 patients (34.6%). Significant differences were observed in ADC_mean, SUV_max, MTV and TLG according to FIGO stage (p < 0.001–0.025). There were significant correlations between ADC_mean, MTV, TLG and LN metastasis (p = 0.017–0.032). SUV_max was not associated with LN metastasis. FIGO stage (p = 0.017/0.033), LN metastases (p = 0.001/0.020), ADC_mean (p = 0.007/0.020) and MTV (p = 0.014/0.026) were adverse predictors of both DFS/OS. _maxTD (p = 0.005) and TLG (p = 0.024) were adverse predictors of DFS. PE and SUV_max did not correlate with DFS or OS (p = 0.18–0.72).

Conclusions

Quantitative parameters derived from pre-treatment DW-MRI (ADC_mean) and from 18F-FDG PET/CT (MTV and TLG) were associated with high-risk features and may serve as prognostic biomarkers of survival in patients with cervical cancer.     

Evaluation of suspected local recurrence in head and neck cancer: a comparison between PET and PET/CT for biopsy proven lesions

Background

¹⁸F-FDG PET has a high accuracy for re-staging of head and neck cancer. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the diagnostic accuracy can be further improved with integrated PET/CT.

Materials and methods

Forty-nine patients with a mean age of 59 ± 18 years were studied retrospectively. Histo-pathological verification was available either from complete tumor resection with or without lymph node dissection (n = 27) or direct endoscopic biopsy (n = 16) or ultrasound guided biopsy (n = 6). Two reviewers blinded to the pathological findings read all PET images in consensus. An experienced radiologist was added for the interpretation of the PET/CT images.

Results

Tissue verification was available for 110 lesions in 49 patients. Sixty-seven lesions (61%) were biopsy positive and 43 (39%) were negative for malignant disease. PET and PET/CT showed an overall accuracy for cancer detection of 84 and 88% (p = 0.06), respectively. Sensitivity and specificity for PET were 78 and 93% versus 84 (p = NS) and 95% (p = NS) with PET/CT. A patient-by-patient analysis yielded a sensitivity, specificity and accuracy for PET of 80, 56 and 76%, compared to 88% (p = NS), 78% (p = NS) and 86% (p = 0.06) for PET/CT.

Conclusion

The results of this study indicate that PET/CT does not significantly improve the detection of recurrence of head and neck cancer. However, a trend towards improved accuracy was observed (p = 0.06).     

Reliability of semiquantitative F-FDG PET parameters derived from simultaneous brain PET/MRI: A feasibility study

Purpose

Simultaneous brain PET/MRI faces an important issue of validation of accurate MRI based attenuation correction (AC) method for precise quantitation of brain PET data unlike in PET/CT systems where the use of standard, validated CT based AC is routinely available. The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility of evaluation of semiquantitative ¹⁸F-FDG PET parameters derived from simultaneous brain PET/MRI using ultrashort echo time (UTE) sequences for AC and to assess their agreement with those obtained from PET/CT examination.

Methods

Sixteen patients (age range 18–73 years; mean age 49.43 (19.3) years; 13 men 3 women) underwent simultaneous brain PET/MRI followed immediately by PET/CT. Quantitative analysis of brain PET images obtained from both studies was undertaken using Scenium v.1 brain analysis software package. Twenty ROIs for various brain regions were system generated and 6 semiquantitative parameters including maximum standardized uptake value (SUV max), SUV mean, minimum SUV (SUV min), minimum standard deviation (SD min), maximum SD (SD max) and SD from mean were calculated for both sets of PET data for each patient. Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs) were determined to assess agreement between the various semiquantitative parameters for the two PET data sets.

Results

Intra-class co-relation between the two PET data sets for SUV max, SUV mean and SD max was highly significant (p < 0.00) for all the 20 predefined brain regions with ICC > 0.9. SD from mean was also found to be statistically significant for all the predefined brain regions with ICC > 0.8. However, SUV max and SUV mean values obtained from PET/MRI were significantly lower compared to those of PET/CT for all the predefined brain regions.

Conclusion

PET quantitation accuracy using the MRI based UTE sequences for AC in simultaneous brain PET/MRI is reliable in a clinical setting, being similar to that obtained using PET/CT.     

Prognostic significance of novel F-FDG PET/CT defined tumour variables in patients with oesophageal cancer

Purpose

¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose (¹⁸F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) combined with computed tomography (PET/CT) is now established as a routine staging investigation of oesophageal cancer (OC). The aim of the study was to determine the prognostic significance of PET/CT defined tumour variables including maximum standardised uptake value (SUVmax), tumour length (TL), metastatic length of disease (MLoD), metabolic tumour volume (MTV), total lesion glycolysis (TLG) and total local nodal metastasis count (PET/CT LNMC).

Materials and methods

103 pre-treatment OC patients (76 adenocarcinoma, 25 squamous cell carcinoma, 1 poorly differentiated and 1 neuroendocrine tumour) were staged using PET/CT. The prognostic value of the measured tumour variables were tested using log-rank analysis of the Kaplan–Meier method and Cox's proportional hazards method. Primary outcome measure was survival from diagnosis.

Results

Univariate analysis showed all variables to have strong statistical significance in relation to survival. Multivariate analysis demonstrated three variables that were significantly and independently associated with survival; MLoD (HR 1.035, 95% CI 1.008–1.064, p = 0.011), TLG (HR 1.002, 95% CI 1.000–1.003, p = 0.018) and PET/CT LNMC (HR 0.048–0.633, 95% CI 0.005–2.725, p = 0.015).

Conclusion

MLoD, TLG, and PET/CT LNMC are important prognostic indicators in OC. This is the first study to demonstrate an independent statistical association between TLG, MLoD and survival by multivariable analysis, and highlights the value of staging OC patients with PET/CT using functional tumour variables.