Influence of the exacerbation of patellofemoral pain on trunk kinematics and lower limb mechanics during stair negotiation

BackgroundAlthough it is assumed that the presence of patellofemoral pain (PFP) may result in compensatory behaviors that can alter trunk kinematics and lower limb mechanics, the influence of the exacerbation of patellofemoral pain on trunk kinematics and lower limb mechanics during stair negotiation has not been established.Research questionDoes the exacerbation of PFP symptoms lead to altered trunk kinematics and lower limb mechanics during stair negotiation?MethodsThree-dimensional kinematics and kinetics were obtained from 45 women with PFP during stair descent and ascent. Data were obtained before and after a pain exacerbation protocol. The variables of interest were peak trunk, hip, and knee flexion, and ankle dorsiflexion; peak hip, and knee extensor, and ankle plantarflexor moments. Paired t-tests were used to compare the variables of interest before and after pain exacerbation.ResultsFollowing pain exacerbation, there was a decrease in peak knee extensor moment during stair descent (Effect size = −0.68; p = 0.01) and stair ascent (Effect size = −0.56; p = 0.02); as well as in peak ankle dorsiflexion during stair descent (Effect size = −0.33; p = 0.01) and stair ascent (Effect size = −0.30; p = 0.01). An increase in ankle plantarflexor moment during stair descent (Effect size = 0.79; p < 0.01) and stair ascent (Effect size = 0.89; p < 0.01) was also observed. No significant differences were observed for peak trunk, hip, and knee flexion or hip extensor moment (p > 0.05).SignificanceOur findings show compensatory strategies used by people with PFP in response to symptoms exacerbation that may have a negative impact on knee and ankle mechanics. Our findings also suggest that people with PFP do not seem to change their trunk, hip, and knee flexion or hip extensor moment during stair negotiation in response to symptom exacerbation.     

The influence of sagittal trunk posture on the magnitude and rate of patellofemoral joint stress during stair ascent in asymptomatic females

Background: Excessive patellofemoral joint stress (PFJS) is thought to be a contributory factor to patellofemoral pain (PFP). Thus, treatment strategies that minimize PFJS rate and magnitude during painful activities like stair ascent may be useful for optimizing outcomes for PFP patients. Sagittal plane trunk posture has been shown to influence PFJS during running although it is unknown if a similar relationship exists during stair ascent. Research Question: Does altering sagittal plane trunk posture affect PFJS rate and/or magnitude during stair ascent? Methods: Twenty asymptomatic females (23.4±2.5 yr; height: 164.4±7.9 cm; mass: 63.0±12.2 kg) performed 5 stair ascent trials (96 steps/min) during 3 conditions: self-selected trunk (SS), flexed trunk (FLX), and extended trunk (EXT). Three-dimensional kinematics (200 Hz) and ground reaction forces (2000 Hz) were collected during each trial. A previously described mathematical model was used to calculate PFJS that included subject-specific and non-subject-specific model inputs. Dependent variables included sagittal plane trunk angle, and the rates and magnitudes of PFJS, patellofemoral joint reaction force (PFJRF), and PFJ contact area during the stance phase of stair ascent. Results: Compared to SS, peak PFJS decreased during FLX (mean difference (MD)=2.6 MPa; p<0.001; 95%CI=2.2 to 2.9; effect size (ES)=5.2) and increased during EXT (MD=-3.3 MPa; p<0.001; 95%CI=-3.9 to -2.6; ES=-3.4). Similarly, PFJS rate decreased during FLX (MD=17.8 MPa/sec; p<0.001; 95%CI=13.6 to 21.9; ES=3.6) and increased during EXT (MD=-14 MPa/sec; 95%CI=-19.4 to -8.7; p<0.001; ES=-2.2). Significance: Sagittal plane trunk posture influences PFJS rate and magnitude during stair ascent in asymptomatic females. Increasing and decreasing forward trunk flexion resulted in decreased and increased PFJS respectively. Future studies should examine the effects of these movement strategy modifications on pain and function in patients with PFP.     

Frontal plane kinematics predict three-dimensional hip adduction during running

ObjectivesTo investigate if frontal plane kinematics are predictive of three dimensional (3D) hip adduction and hip internal rotation during running.Study designCross-sectional.SettingBiomechanics laboratory.ParticipantsThirty healthy male runners aged 18–45 years.Main outcome measuresTwo dimensional (2D) angles in the frontal plane (peak pelvic obliquity, peak hip adduction, peak femoral valgus, peak knee valgus and peak tibial valgus) and 3D hip adduction and hip internal rotation during stance phase of running were obtained.ResultsLinear regression modelling revealed that peak 2D pelvic obliquity (a drop towards the contralateral leg) and peak femoral valgus significantly predicted 88% of the variance in peak 3D hip adduction (p < 0.001). Frontal plane kinematics however, were not predictive of peak hip internal rotation in 3D (p > 0.05).ConclusionsFrontal plane kinematics, specifically contralateral pelvic drop and femoral valgus, predicted the vast majority of the variance in 3D hip adduction during the stance phase of running. This indicates that 2D video may have potential as a clinically feasible proxy for measurement of peak 3D hip adduction – a risk factor for patellofemoral pain.     

Women with patellofemoral pain and knee crepitus have reduced knee flexion angle during stair ascent

ObjectivesTo compare trunk and knee biomechanics of women with and without patellofemoral pain (PFP) and knee crepitus during stair ascent.DesignCross-sectional.SettingLaboratory-based study.Participants29 women with PFP and knee crepitus (PFP_Crepitus); 28 women with PFP and no knee crepitus (PFP_NOCrepitus); 17 pain-free women with knee crepitus (Pain-free_Crepitus); and 29 pain-free women without knee crepitus (Pain-free_NOCrepitus).Main outcome measuresPeak trunk flexion, peak knee flexion, mean knee angular velocity, knee extensor moment at peak knee flexion, peak and impulse of the knee extensor moment.ResultsPFP_Crepitus group performed the stair ascent task with reduced peak knee flexion compared to Pain-free_Crepitus (p = 0.04; Effect size = −0.85) and Pain-free_NOCrepitus (p = 0.03; Effect size = −0.75). No significant differences among groups were found for peak trunk flexion (p = 0.979), knee angular velocity (p = 0.420), knee extensor moment at peak knee flexion (p = 0.933), peak (p = 0.290) and impulse (p = 0.122) of the knee extensor moment.ConclusionWomen with concomitant PFP and knee crepitus demonstrated reduced knee flexion during stair ascent, but no significant differences for trunk flexion and knee extensor moment variables were found.     

Comparisons of cervical and thoracic spine kinematic joint and body segment angles,timing, and velocity between individuals with and without chronic idiopathic neck pain during functional tasks

BackgroundFew studies comprehensively analyse 3D neck kinematics in individuals with chronic idiopathic neck pain during functional tasks considered challenging. This critical knowledge is needed to assist clinicians to recognise and address how altered movement strategies might contribute to pain.Research questionAre there differences in 3D neck kinematics (angles, timing, velocity) during functional tasks in people with chronic neck pain compared to matched asymptomatic control participants?MethodsParticipants with chronic idiopathic neck pain (n = 33) and matched asymptomatic controls (n = 30) performed four functional tasks (overhead reach forward, right and left, and putting on a seatbelt) while evaluated using 3D motion capture. Kinematic variables included joint angles, range of motion (ROM,°), velocity (m s⁻¹) and timing (% of movement phase) for joint angles (head-neck [HN joint], head+neck-upper trunk [HNT], and thoracolumbar) and segments (head, neck, head+neck [HN segment], upper trunk, and trunk. Generalised linear mixed models examined between-group differences.ResultsThere were few between-group differences. The neck pain group had less HN segment extension that controls (mean difference [MD] left −2.06°; 95% CI −3.82, −0.29; p = .023; and right reach −2.52°; −4.67, −0.37; P = .022), and had less total sagittal HNT ROM across all tasks (−1.28; 95% CI −2.25, −0.31; p = .010). Approaching significance was the pain group having less thoracolumbar left rotation than controls (MD −2.14, 95% CI −4.41 to 0.13, p = .064). The pain group had higher neck segment peak flexion velocity than controls across all tasks (MD −3.09; 95% CI −5.21 to −0.10; P = .004). Timing of joint angle peaks did not differ between groups.SignificanceWhen performing an overhead reach task to the left and right and putting on a seatbelt, people with neck pain maintain a more flexed HN segment, use less sagittal ROM and have higher velocity peaks. These findings can assist clinicians in their assessment of patients by identifying possible underlying contributors to neck pain.     

Knee adduction moments are not increased in obese knee osteoarthritis patients during stair negotiation

BackgroundNegotiating stairs is an important activity of daily living that is also associated with large loads on the knee joint. In medial compartment knee osteoarthritis, the knee adduction moment during level walking is considered a marker for disease severity. It could be argued that the discriminative capability of this parameter is even better if tested in a strenuous stair negotiation task.Research questionWhat is the relation with knee osteoarthritis on the knee adduction moment during the stance phase of both stair ascent and descent in patients with and without obesity?MethodsThis case control study included 22 lean controls, 16 lean knee osteoarthritis patients, and 14 obese knee osteoarthritis patients. All subjects ascended and descended a two-step staircase at a self-selected, comfortable speed. Three-dimensional motion analysis was performed to evaluate the knee adduction moment during stair negotiation.ResultsObese knee osteoarthritis patients show a prolonged stance time together with a more flattened knee adduction moment curve during stair ascent. Normalized knee adduction moment impulse, as well as the first and second peaks were not different between groups. During stair descent, a similar increase in stance time was found for both osteoarthritis groups.SignificanceThe absence of a significant effect of groups on the normalized knee adduction moment during stair negotiation may be explained by a lower ambulatory speed in the obese knee osteoarthritis group, that effectively lowers vertical ground reaction force. Decreasing ambulatory speed may be an effective strategy to lower knee adduction moment during stair negotiation.     

Immediate effects of foot orthoses on gait biomechanics in individuals with persistent patellofemoral pain

BackgroundThe efficacy of foot orthoses in reducing patellofemoral pain (PFP) is well documented; however, the mechanisms by which foot orthoses modulate pain and function are poorly understood.Research questionThis within-subject study investigated the immediate effects of foot orthoses on lower limb kinematics and angular impulses during level walking and stair ambulation in individuals with persistent PFP.MethodsForty-two participants with persistent PFP (≥3 months duration) underwent quantitative gait analysis during level walking, stair ascent and stair descent while using: (i) standard running sandals (control); and (ii) standard running sandals fitted with prefabricated foot orthoses. Hip, knee, and ankle joint kinematics and angular impulses were calculated and statistically analyzed using paired t-tests (p < 0.05).ResultsRelative to the control condition, foot orthoses use was associated with small but significant decreases in maximum ankle inversion angles during walking (mean difference [95% confidence interval]: −1.00° [−1.48 to −0.53]), stair ascent (−1.06° [−1.66 to −0.45]) and stair decent (−0.94° [−1.40 to −0.49]). Foot orthoses were also associated with decreased ankle eversion impulse during walking (−9.8Nms/kg [−12.7 to −6.8]), and decreased ankle dorsiflexion and eversion impulse during stair ascent (−67.6Nms/kg [−100.7 to −34.6] and −17.5Nms/kg [−23.6 to −11.4], respectively) and descent (−50.4Nms/kg [−77.2 to −23.6] and −11.6Nms/kg [−15.6 to −7.5], respectively). Ankle internal rotation impulse decreased when participants ascended stairs with foot orthoses (−3.3Nms/kg [−5.4 to −1.3]). Limited changes were observed at the knee and hip.SignificanceIn individuals with persistent PFP, small immediate changes in kinematics and angular impulses – primarily at the ankle – were observed when foot orthoses were worn during walking or stair ambulation. The clinical implications of these small changes, as well as the longer-term effects of foot orthoses on lower limb biomechanics, are yet to be determined.     

Is markerless,smart phone recorded two-dimensional video a clinically useful measure of relevant lower limb kinematics in runners with patellofemoral pain? A validity and reliability study

ObjectivesInvestigate the validity and reliability of markerless, smart phone collected, two-dimensional (2D) video, analysed using the ‘Hudl technique’ application, compared to three-dimensional (3D) kinematics during running, in participants with patellofemoral pain (PFP).DesignValidity/reliability study.SettingBiomechanics laboratory.ParticipantsMales/females with PFP (n = 21, 10 males, 11 females, age 32.1 months [±12.9]).Main outcome measuresManually synchronised 2D and 3D measurement of peak hip adduction (HADD) and peak knee flexion (KFLEX) during running.Results2D and 3D measures of peak KFLEX (p = 0.02, d = 1.13), but not peak HADD (p = 0.25, d = −0.27), differed significantly. Poor validity was identified for 2D measurement of peak HADD (ICC 0.06, 95% CI -0.35, 0.47) and peak KFLEX ICC 0.42, 95% CI (−0.10, 0.75). Moderate intra-rater reliability was identified for both variables (ICC 0.61–65), alongside moderate inter-rater reliability for peak KFLEX (ICC 0.71) and poor inter-rater reliability for peak HADD (ICC 0.31).ConclusionsMeasurement of peak HADD and KFLEX in runners with PFP using markerless, smart phone collected 2D video, analysed using the Hudl technique Application is invalid, with poor to moderate reliability. Investigation of alternate 2D video approaches to increase precision is warranted. At present, 2D video analysis of running using Hudl Technique cannot be advocated.     

Relationship among maximum hip isometric strength,hip kinematics,and peak gluteal muscle force during running

ObjectiveTo determine if there is a relationship among isometric hip strength, hip kinematics, and peak gluteal muscle forces in cross-country runners during running.DesignCross Sectional.SettingUniversity Biomechanics Laboratory.ParticipantsForty-six NCAA Division III collegiate cross-country runners (18 males, 28 females).Main outcome measuresPearson correlation coefficients were used to describe relationships among isometric hip strength, hip kinematics, and peak gluteal muscle forces during the stance phase of running. Strength of correlations were interpreted as little to no relationship (r < 0.25), fair relationship (0.25 ≤ r < 0.5), moderate relationship (0.5 ≤ r < 0.75), and strong relationship (r ≥ 0.75). Correlations were considered significant if p < 0.05.ResultsLittle to no relationships were found among isometric hip strength and gluteal muscle forces during running (r < 0.25). A fair relationship was present between prone external rotation isometric hip strength and peak hip adduction (0.25 < r < 0.5). Little to no relationship was shown between gluteus medius force and hip internal rotation. Moderate relationships were present among peak gluteus medius and minimus muscle forces and peak hip adduction (0.5 < r < 0.75).ConclusionIsometric hip strength does not appear to be related to gluteal muscle forces and hip kinematics during the stance phase of running while gluteal muscle force was moderately related to hip adduction. Factors other than strength may be related to muscle force production and hip kinematics during running.     

Combined versus individual effects of a valgus knee brace and lateral wedge foot orthotic during stair use in patients with knee osteoarthritis

The aim of this study was to investigate the combined and individual biomechanical effects of a valgus knee brace and a lateral wedge foot orthotic during stair ascent and descent in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA). Thirty-five patients with varus alignment and medial knee OA were prescribed a custom valgus knee brace and lateral wedge foot orthotic. Knee angles and moments in the frontal and sagittal planes were determined from 3D gait analysis completed under four randomized conditions: (1) control (no knee brace or foot orthotic), (2) knee brace, (3) foot orthotic, and (4) combined knee brace and foot orthotic. Additional measures included the vertical ground reaction force, trunk lean, toe out and gait speed. During the combined use of a knee brace and foot orthotic, significant decreases in the knee adduction angle (2.17, 95%CI: 0.50-3.84, p = 0.013) and 2nd peak EKAM (0.35, 95%CI: 0.17–0.52, p < 0.001) were observed during stair descent; and significant increases in the EKFM were observed during stair ascent (0.54, 95%CI: 0.30–0.78, p < 0.001) and descent (1stpk: 0.48, 95%CI: 0.15-0.80, p = 0.005; 2ndpk: 0.55, 95%CI: 0.34–0.76, p < 0.001). Fewer gait compensations were observed between conditions during stair descent compared to ascent, except for toe out. Findings suggest greater effects on gait when both knee brace and foot orthotic are used together, resulting in a more normal gait pattern. However, whether or not a true change in knee joint load can be inferred when using these orthoses remains unclear. Further research is required to determine the clinical importance of the observed changes.     

Short-term effects of a trunk modification program on patellofemoral joint stress in asymptomatic runners

ObjectivesTo evaluate short-term effects of a four-week gait retraining program using visual feedback on trunk flexion angle, patellofemoral joint (PFJ) stress, lower extremity biomechanics and motor skill automaticity.DesignLongitudinal interventional study.SettingsUniversity research laboratory.ParticipantsTwelve asymptomatic recreational runners (seven male and five female).Main outcome measuresTrunk kinematics as well as lower extremity kinematics and kinetics were assessed prior to training at week 1 (baseline) and week 2, 3, 4 and 8 (retention). PFJ stress was computed using a sagittal plane model. A dual-task procedure was performed to examine automaticity.ResultsAt week 8, runners demonstrated 10.1° increase in trunk flexion angle (p < .001) and 17.8% reduction in peak PFJ stress (p < .001) compared to baseline. This is associated with a 16.8% decrease in knee extensor moment and less than 2.5° change in knee flexion angle. Participants also showed 33.3% increase in peak hip extensor moment and small reduction in peak ankle plantar flexor moment. Lastly, runners demonstrated automaticity of the modified skill with a dual-task cost of less than 3%.ConclusionThe gait retraining program is effective to elicit short term changes in trunk position, PFJ stress, and automaticity of the new motor skill.     

Alterations in medial-lateral postural control after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction during stair use

BackgroundDynamic postural control during everyday tasks is poorly understood in people following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Understanding dynamic postural control can provide insight into potentially modifiable impairments in people following ACLR who are at increased risk for second ACL injury and/or knee osteoarthritis.Research questionDetermine whether measures indicative of dynamic postural control differ between individuals with and without ACLR during stair ascent and descent. Methods: Seventeen individuals with ACLR (>1 yr post-surgery) and 16 age and sex-matched healthy controls participated. Centre of pressure (COP) measures included: i) COP excursion, ii) COP velocity, and iii) dynamic time-toboundary (TTB). Mixed linear models were used to compare COP measures for the ACLR leg, non-ACLR leg, and healthy controls during stair ascent and stair descent.ResultsThere were no statistically significant differences observed during stair ascent (all p > 0.05). Several statistical differences were found during stair descent for individual with ACLR, but not between those with ACLR and healthy controls. The ACLR leg had higher medial-lateral COP excursion (mean difference 1.06 cm, [95 %CI 0.08–2.06 cm], p = 0.036; effect size = 0.38) compared to the non-ACLR leg during stair descent. In addition, the ACLR leg had a lower medial-lateral TTB (mean difference −13 ms [95 %CI −38 to 2 ms], p = 0.005; effect size = 0.49) and medial-lateral TTB normalized to stance time (mean difference −5.8 % [95 %CI −10.3 to 1.3 %], p = 0.012; effect size = 0.80) compared to the non-ACLR leg during stair descent. No statistical differences were observed for anterior-posterior measures during stair descent (all p > 0.05). Significance: Taken together, findings indicate that there are small to large differences in medial-lateral postural control in the ACLR leg compared to the non-ACLR leg during stair descent. Further work is required to understand clinical implication of these novel observations.     

Kinematic analysis of pressing situations in female collegiate football games: New insight into anterior cruciate ligament injury causation

The most common events during which anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries occur in football are pressing situations. This study aimed to describe the knee and hip joint kinematics during pressing situations in football games to identify kinematic patterns in actions with a high risk for ACL injuries. We filmed 5 female collegiate football matches and identified 66 pressing situations. Five situations with a large distance between the trunk and foot placements in the sagittal plane were analyzed using a model‐based image‐matching technique. The mean knee flexion angle at initial contact (IC) was 13° (range, 8°‐28°) and increased by 11° (95% confidence interval [CI], 3°‐14°) at 40 ms after IC. As for knee adduction and rotation angles, the knee positions were close to neutral at IC, and only minor knee angular changes occurred later in the sequences. The mean hip flexion was 25° (range, 8°‐43°) at IC and increased by 22° (95% CI, 11°‐32°) after 100 ms. The hip was also externally rotated by 7° (range, −19° to 3°) at IC, and gradually rotated internally, reaching 10° of internal rotation (range, −5° to 27°) at 100 ms after IC. This study suggests that the observed knee valgus, internal hip and knee rotation, and static hip flexion previously reported in non‐contact ACL injury events are unique to injury situations. In contrast, neither rapid knee valgus nor increased internal rotation was seen in non‐injury pressing maneuvers.     

Age related progression of clinical measures and gait in ambulant children and youth with bilateral cerebral palsy without a history of surgical intervention

BackgroundAge related progression needs to be considered when assessing current status and treatment outcomes in cerebral palsy (CP).Research questionWhat is the association between age, gait kinematics and clinical measures in children with bilateral CP?MethodA retrospective database review was conducted. Subjects with bilateral CP with baseline and follow-up 3D gait analyses, but no history of intervening surgery were identified. Clinical and summary kinematic measures were examined for age related change using repeat measures correlation. Interactions with GMFCS classification and whether surgery was recommended were examined using robust linear regression. Timeseries kinematic data for baseline and most recent follow-up analyses were analysed using statistical parametric mapping.Results180 subjects were included. 75% of participants were classified as GMFCS I or II at baseline. Mean time to follow-up was 4.89 (2.8) years (range 1–15.9 years) with a mean age of 6.4 (2.4) at baseline and 11.3 (3.4) at final follow-up. 15.5% of subjects demonstrated an improvement in GMFCS classification while GDI remained stable. Age related progression was noted across many clinical measures with moderate correlations (r ≥ 0.5) noted for reduced popliteal angle, long lever hip abduction and internal hip rotation range. In gait, there was reduced hip extension in late stance (p < 0.001), increased knee flexion in mid-stance (p < 0.001), reduced peak knee flexion in swing (p < 0.001) and increased ankle dorsiflexion in stance (p < 0.001). In the coronal plane, there was reduced hip abduction in swing (p < 0.001). In the transverse plane, increased external rotation of the knee (p < 0.001) and reduced external ankle rotation were noted in early stance and through swing (p < 0.001). There were no changes in foot progression or hip rotation.SignificanceIndividuals with CP show age related progression of clinical and kinematic variables. Treatment can only be deemed successful if outcomes exceed or match these age-related changes.     

Does the Powers™ strap influence the lower limb biomechanics during running?

Previous research has reported a prevalence of running related injuries in 25.9% to 72% of all runners. A greater hip internal rotation and adduction during the stance phase in running has been associated with many running related injuries, such as patellofemoral pain. Researchers in the USA designed a treatment device ‘the Powers™ strap' to facilitate an external rotation of the femur and to thereby control abnormal hip and knee motion during leisure and sport activities. However, to date no literature exists to demonstrate whether the Powers™ strap is able to reduce hip internal rotation during running.22 healthy participants, 11 males and 11 females (age: 27.45 ± 4.43 years, height: 1.73 ± 0.06m, mass: 66.77 ± 9.24 kg) were asked to run on a 22 m track under two conditions: without and with the Powers™ strap. Three-dimensional motion analysis was conducted using ten Qualisys OQUS 7 cameras (Qualisys AB, Sweden) and force data was captured with three AMTI force plates (BP600900, Advanced Mechanical Technology, Inc.USA). Paired sample t-tests were performed at the 95% confidence interval on all lower limb kinematic and kinetic data.The Powers™ strap significantly reduced hip and knee internal rotation throughout the stance phase of running. These results showed that the Powers™ strap has the potential to influence hip motion during running related activities, in doing so this might be beneficial for patients with lower limb injuries. Future research should investigate the influence of the Powers™ strap in subjects who suffer from running related injuries, such as patellofemoral pain.     

Kinesiophobia,but not strength is associated with altered movement in women with patellofemoral pain

BackgroundEvidence indicates the presence of both kinesiophobia and knee extension strength deficits in women with patellofemoral pain (PFP). Both impairments may contribute to apparent compensatory gait patterns including reduced cadence and peak knee flexion during stair negotiation.Research questionIs kinesiophobia or knee extension strength associated with movement pattern in women with patellofemoral pain?MethodsForty women with PFP were assessed with three-dimensional kinematic analyses during stair descent; isokinetic dynamometry of the knee extensors (isometric, concentric and eccentric); and the Tampa scale for kinesiophobia. Pearson coefficients were calculated to determine relationship among variables.ResultsKinesiophobia correlated significantly with cadence (r = −0.62, p < 0.001), and peak knee flexion (r = −0.76, p < 0.001). No significant correlations were found between any knee extensor strength variables and kinematics (cadence or peak knee flexion); or kinesiophobia (p > 0.05).SignificanceFindings of this study could suggest addressing strength impairments alone may not adequately address kinesiophobia and movement pattern impairments in women with PFP. However, high-quality randomised controlled trials are needed to test this assumption. Further value may be added if currently evidence-based knee strengthening exercise is combined with education and/or graded exposure to address kinesiophobia, and consideration to gait retraining to address altered movement patterns at the knee.     

Movement compensations during a step ascent task are associated with stair climbing performance in people with multiple sclerosis

BackgroundThe biomechanical mechanisms underlying stair climbing limitations are poorly understood in people with multiple sclerosis (MS).Research QuestionsAre trunk and pelvis motion and lower extremity joint moments during step ascent different between MS and control groups? Are step ascent biomechanics and stair climbing performance associated in people with MS?Methods20 people with MS (49 ± 12 years, EDSS range: 1.5–5.5) and ten control participants (48 ± 12 years) underwent three-dimensional motion analysis while ascending a 15.2-cm step and also completed a timed Functional Stair Test. Main effects of group (MS vs Control) and limb (Stronger/Dominant vs Weaker/Non-dominant) and interactions were assessed using two-way analyses of variance. Associations between movement patterns during the step ascent and Functional Stair Test performance were performed using Pearson’s correlations and backward stepwise linear regression.ResultsSignificant group main effects were observed in greater sagittal pelvis excursion (p < 0.001), greater sagittal (p = 0.013) and frontal (p = 0.001) trunk excursion, and lower trail limb peak ankle plantar flexion moment (p < 0.001) of the MS group. Significant limb main effects were observed with greater sagittal trunk excursion (p = 0.037) and peak trail limb ankle plantar flexion moment (p = 0.037) in the stronger/dominant limb. A significant interaction was observed in peak knee extensor moment (p = .002). Stair climbing performance in the MS group correlated with sagittal (r = .607, p=<0.001) and frontal pelvis excursions (r = 0.385, p = 0.014), sagittal trunk excursion (r = .411, p = 0.008), and ankle plantar flexion moments (r=-0.415, p = 0.008). Sagittal and frontal pelvis excursion and bilateral handrail use explained a significant amount of variability in stair climbing performance (Adj R² = 0.775).SignificanceIn conclusion, despite the presence of proximal and distal lower extremity movement pattern compensations during a step ascent task, larger pelvis angular excursions are associated with impaired stair climbing performance in people with MS and may serve as targets for future rehabilitation interventions.     

Effects of a hip brace on biomechanics and pain in people with femoroacetabular impingement

Objectives

This study evaluates whether hip bracing in patients with femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) (a) immediately reduces range of hip internal rotation, flexion, adduction, and pain during functional tasks; and (b) improves patient-reported outcomes when worn daily over 4 weeks.

The relationship of hip loading asymmetry and radiological parameters of the spine in Lenke type 1 idiopathic scoliosis

BackgroundIdiopathic scoliosis does not only cause structural changes in the spine, but also functional changes of the musculoskeletal system.Research questionDoes idiopathic scoliosis lead to asymmetric hip loading in severe Lenke type 1 deformity?Methods23 patients (18 girls, 5 boys) aged 15 ± 2.8 years with an adolescent idiopathic main thoracic curve (Cobb angle 48.8°+/- 9.2°) were included. Measured X-ray parameters were: Cobb angle of primary thoracic and secondary lumbar curve, translation of the C7- plumb line, apical thoracic vertebra and apical lumbar vertebra from the central sacral vertical line. Subjects were examined by means of kinematic and kinetic gait analysis. The symmetry index (SI) was calculated as a ratio of hip frontal moments during a single stance for both sides when the symmetrical load was considered SI = 0 + /- 29.36 (0 +/- 1 SD of the mean SI of the healthy population). The Pearson correlation coefficient was used to show the relation between hip loading and radiologic measures of spinal deformity.ResultsOnly 34.8% of subjects with Lenke type 1 deformity showed symmetrical hip loading. Significant negative correlation was proved between SI and apical thoracic vertebra translation (R = - 0541; p < 0,05) as well as between SI and coronal imbalance (R = −0,5197; p < 0,05). There was no correlation between SI and the magnitude of the primary thoracic curve (R = −0.19; p = 0.385). Coronal imbalance correlates positively with translation of apical thoracic vertebra (R = 0,7255; p < 0,05).SignificanceTwo-thirds of subjects with Lenke type 1 deformity showed asymmetrical hip loading. This asymmetry is related to the translation of the apical thoracic vertebra and coronal imbalance and is not related to the magnitude of the main thoracic curve. On the contrary, the secondary lumbar curve plays role in the compensatory mechanism of the trunk.     

Changes in stair ascent biomechanics two to eight years after ACL reconstruction are associated with patient-reported outcomes

BackgroundAnterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury is often followed by quadriceps deficits that are apparent with gait analysis. The deficit frequently remains after ACL reconstruction (ACLR). As such, evaluation of ACLR patients could be enhanced by a simple method to detect quadriceps deficits. Analyzing forward trunk flexion during stair ascent has been suggested as an assessment of quadriceps function that can be visualized with relatively simple instrumentation.AimThe purpose of this study was to determine if trunk flexion angle (TFA) during stair ascent is associated with quadriceps function (as measured by the peak knee flexion moment (KFM)) at 2 and 8 years post-ACLR and if changes are associated with patient-reported outcomes (PRO).MethodsFourteen subjects with unilateral primary ACLR performed three stair-ascending trials at two-time periods: 2 years (baseline) and 8 years (follow-up) post-ACLR. Paired Student t-tests determined differences in KFM and TFA. Associations between KFM, TFA, and PRO were determined through Pearson correlations.ResultsPeak KFM during stair ascent significantly increased from baseline to follow-up (p = 0.01). Though there was no significant difference in TFA (p = 0.84) compared to baseline, 50% of subjects showed decreases in TFA. Further, subjects with reduced TFA during stair ascent at follow-up had significantly increased peak KFM (p = 0.029) and improvements in PRO (p = 0.001).DiscussionThe results suggest that TFA during stair ascent can provide a simple method to assess changes in quadriceps function and pain over time following ACLR. Further analysis is needed to draw conclusions between knee osteoarthritis development and increases in TFA.