Comparable walking gait performance during executive and non-executive cognitive dual-tasks in chronic stroke: A pilot study

BackgroundFalls are a serious problem among stroke survivors due to subsequent injuries, recovery setbacks, dependence, and mortality. A growing body of dual-task (DT) studies suggests a role of executive functions in gait control and falls, particularly in subacute stroke. However, few studies have compared distinct executive and non-executive tasks, nor their effects on chronic stroke gait. Research question: The purpose of this cross-sectional study was to compare the effects of distinct working memory (2-back) and inhibition (Stroop) tasks on walking gait performance in chronic stroke survivors.MethodsA pilot sample of chronic stroke survivors (n = 11, 8 males, mean age = 70.91, 6-12months post-stroke event) and age-matched healthy controls (n = 13, 4 male; mean age = 68.46) were tested. Gait performance (speed, stride time, stride time variability, stride length and stride length variability) was measured using 2 wireless inertial measurement sensors under 4 walking conditions: 1) preferred walking (single-task: ST), 2) walking with a 2-back DT, 3) walking with a Stroop DT, and 4) walking with a non-executive motor response DT. The secondary tasks were also carried out in both ST (seated) and DT conditions, to examine bidirectional effects.ResultsWhile the stroke survivor sample had a slower gait speed across conditions and tasks, there were no significant differences between the groups [F(1, 22) = 1.13, p =.299, η²p = .049] on the spatial or temporal gait characteristics recorded: gait performance was maintained during executive and non-executive DTs. In addition, we did not find a significant effect of group on cognitive task performance (all p > .052). However, we observed a cost in accuracy on the 2-back DT for both groups, suggesting resource overlap and greater cognitive load (all t > 19.72, all p < .001).SignificanceOur gait data contradict previous studies evidencing impaired gait post-stroke, suggesting functional recovery in this chronic stroke sample.     

Mobile phone use is detrimental for gait stability in young adults

BackgroundHuman walking is a highly automated motor task, however if the individual’s attention is divided, gait can be negatively affected. Although the effect of divided attention has been usually tested with standardised cognitive tasks, the common task of walking while talking on the phone may represent an ecological dual task scenario.Research questionWhat is the effect of divided attention on locomotion when using a mobile phone?MethodsThirty-seven healthy participants were asked to walk while performing different cognitive tasks: counting and spelling backwards, talking on the phone (handset by the ear and hands-free), and texting. As a control, extra postural conditions were tested: holding the phone by the ear (without talking) and carrying the phone as in the texting task. These tasks were compared with normal walking (no other cognitive or postural task). Twenty participants also performed the same tasks with the addition of an obstacle halfway through the walkway. Gait performance was measured using non-invasive inertial sensors. Step time and mediolateral acceleration range were calculated.ResultsStep time increased when counting (mean ± standard error 0.63 ± 0.02 s, p < 0.001), spelling backwards (0.67 ± 0.03 s, p < 0.001) and texting (0.61 ± 0.02 s, p = 0.005) compared to normal walking (0.56 ± 0.02 s). Compared to normal walking (8.03 ± 0.58 m/s²), mediolateral acceleration decreased when counting (6.43 ± 0.39 m/s², p < 0.001), spelling backwards (6.67 ± 0.44 m/s², p < 0.001), when talking on the phone while holding the phone (7.28 ± 0.48 m/s², p = 0.003), or hands-free (7.28 ± 0.40 m/s², p = 0.004), or texting (6.71 ± 0.50 m/s², p < 0.001). Introducing an obstacle confirmed these results.SignificanceThis study shows that even in young and healthy individuals, gait is affected by divided attention. Furthermore, the results show that common and ecological cognitive tasks, such as phone use, could induce measurable worsening of gait performance. Individuals should be careful when walking and performing other tasks that could distract them, by dividing their attention.     

Effects of gender on dual-tasking and prioritization in older adults

BackgroundThe ability to produce effective posture and balance while distracted (dual-tasking; DT), is critical for mobility. In particular, individuals implicit prioritization across posture and secondary, distracting stimuli may impact fall risk. However, the impact of gender on DT and prioritization during gait is poorly understood.Research questionDoes gender impact DT effects or prioritization while DT walking?MethodsOne hundred older adults participated. The timed up and go (TUG) was completed with and without a secondary cognitive task (counting backwards by 3′s). Gait (time to complete the TUG), and cognitive (rate of correct numbers listed) performance was recorded during both single tasks and while dual-tasking. DT effects were calculated for cognitive and gait performance. Prioritization was calculated as the difference between cognitive and gait DT effects. The effect of gender on DT and prioritization was assessed, controlling for age and cognitive ability.ResultsGender by condition (single vs. dual-task) interaction effects were observed (Gait: F_1,96 =8.7; p = 0.004; Cognition: F_1,96 =5.2; p = 0.024) such that, compared to male participants, females exhibited smaller cognitive DT effects, and larger gait DT effects. Further, females exhibited significantly larger prioritization scores (F_1,95 =10.0, p = 0.002), indicating a cognitive prioritization compared to males.SignificanceGiven the link between posture-second strategies and falls, the current findings may provide some insight into previous results suggesting an increased fall-risk in older-adult women. However, this study did not investigate falls. Therefore, additional work is necessary to confirm current findings and further investigate the relationship between gender, prioritization, and falls; and its possible clinical relevance.     

Is pregnancy brain real? Comparison of dual task cost during overground walking in pregnant versus control women

BackgroundMany pregnant women report that their memory is impaired compared to non-pregnancy, but results of studies of cognitive abilities are mixed. The effect of pregnancy on dual tasking, or performance of two tasks simultaneously, has not been studied, however.Research questionWhat is the effect of walking overground at a self-selected speed while also performing a cognitive task on gait and cognitive performance during 3rd trimester of pregnancy compared to non-pregnant controls?MethodsA total of n = 22 3rd trimester pregnant women (mean 33.3 ± 3.3 weeks gestation, age 32.1 ± 4.7 years) and n = 21 non-pregnant controls (age 31.9 ± 3.3 years) were recruited to participate. All participants performed single task walking on a GAITRite gait analysis system and performed three cognitive tests while walking: serial 3 and 7 subtraction tests and a phoneme monitoring test. Participants completed the same assessments while seated and order of the testing was counterbalanced. Dual task cost (DTC) was calculated using the formula (Single task score – Dual task score)/Single task score)*100. Independent t-tests or Mann Whitney U tests were used to compare the two groups depending on normality of data.ResultsThere were no significant differences in cognitive test performance between control and pregnant women while walking or seated (p > 0.05). There were no significant differences between groups for DTC during any cognitive tests, but DTC was significantly greater for walking velocity in pregnant women compared to controls for serial 3 (p < 0.001) and serial 7 (p = 0.005) but not phoneme monitoring (p = 0.061).SignificancePregnant women had elevated cost of dual tasking, though the decrements were not in cognitive tests but in gait, specifically with greater DTC of walking velocity. This suggests that pregnant women modify their walking velocity to preserve cognitive function during activities requiring focus on both cognitive and physical tasks.     

The effects of cognitive versus motor concurrent task on gait in individuals with transtibial amputation,transfemoral amputation and in a healthy control group

BackgroundLower limb amputation causes difficulties in mobility together with motor and sensory loss. Challenging situations such as concurrent tasks cause gait parameters to deteriorate. Understanding the effect of concurrent tasks on gait is important for the rehabilitation of amputees.Research questionAre the effects of concurrent cognitive and motor tasks on gait parameters at fixed speed different in individuals with transtibial amputation, or transfemoral amputation compared to healthy individuals?MethodsThe gait parameters were evaluated of 20 individuals with transtibial amputation, 13 individuals with transfemoral amputation and 20 healthy individuals while walking on a motorized treadmill under single task (ST), cognitive dual task (CDT) and motor dual task (MDT) conditions. The self-selected comfortable velocity, which was determined in the single-task gait, was used in all three walking tests.ResultsST, CDT and MDT gait parameters of individuals with transtibial amputation, transfemoral amputation and healthy individuals were significantly different (p < 0.01). Covariance of step length variability increased in amputees when walking under MDT (p < 0.05). The dual task cost (DTC) for all the gait parameters was similar in all three groups (p > 0.05). The motor DTC of covariance of step length was greater than cognitive DTC (p < 0.05).SignificanceIndividuals with lower limb amputation have the capacity to walk with cognitive and motor tasks without changing velocity on the treadmill, but concurrent motor tasks cause an increase in gait variability. The results of this study suggest that there is an increase in gait variability especially with motor tasks, which may cause a higher risk of falling.Trial number: NCT04392466 (clinicaltrials.gov)     

Dynamic stability during walking in children with and without cerebral palsy

BackgroundCerebral palsy (CP) is associated with a high risk of falling during walking. Many gait abnormalities associated with CP likely alter foot placement and center of mass (CoM) movement in a way that affects anterior or lateral dynamic stability, in turn influencing fall risk.Research questionDo children with CP demonstrate altered anterior or lateral dynamic stability compared to typically-developing (TD) children?MethodsIn this case-control, observational study, we measured gait kinematics of two groups of children (15 CP, 11 GMFCS level I, 4 GMFCS level II; 14 TD; age 5–12) in walking conditions of a preferred speed, a fast speed, and a preferred speed while completing a cognitive task. For dominant and non-dominant limbs, the margin of stability (MoS), a spatial measure of dynamic stability, was calculated as the distance between the edge of the base of support and the CoM position after accounting for scaled velocity. Statistical comparisons of were made using mixed factorial ANOVAs. Post hoc comparisons were Sidak adjusted.ResultsThe anterior MoS before foot strike and at mid-swing differed between each condition but not between groups. Based on the minimum lateral MoS, children with CP had more stability when bearing weight on their non-dominant limb compared to TD children. These differences were not apparent when on the dominant limb.SignificanceThis high-functioning group of children with CP exhibited a more conservative lateral stability strategy during walking when bearing weight with the non-dominant limb. This strategy may be protective against lateral falls. We observed no between-group differences in anterior stability. Because CP has been previously associated with impaired anterior balance reactions, and there was no observed compensation in anterior gait stability, this lack of group differences could contribute to a higher risk of falling in that direction.     

Cognitive performance during gait is worsened by overground but enhanced by treadmill walking

PurposeWalking is an attention-demanding task that affects and is affected by cognitive performance. Since treadmill walking (TW) assists gait automaticity, we have hypothesized that TW affects cognitive performance to a smaller extent than overground walking (OW).MethodsThirty young adults were recruited. Each subject walked overground over a 20-meter straight hallway at three different speeds (slow, normal and fast). Each task was repeated 3 times under Single Task (OW-ST) and Dual Task (OW-DT) condition, in a randomized sequence. DT was a serial subtraction by 7 starting from a different number (> 100) in each trial. Afterwards, each subject walked on the treadmill at the same three speeds as during OW-ST, while performing the dual task (TW-DT). The correct cognitive response (CCR), calculated from the number of correct responses and mistakes, was compared between rest, OW-DT and TW-DT. Dual-task cost (DTC) was calculated for speed and for CCR.ResultsBackward counting diminished normal and fast OW-DT speed by about 15 %. Slow OW-DT speed was not significantly reduced. In turn, OW affected the cognitive performance. DTC for speed during OW-DT increased during normal and fast speed. CCR significantly decreased, more at slower OW-DT speed. Conversely, CCR was not worsened by TW-DT. CCR did not decline at slow TW-DT speed and improved significantly from slow and normal to fast speeds. DTC for CCR resulted smaller in TW-DT than OW-DT.ConclusionsDecline in the cognitive performance during OW-DT is more prominent at slow speed, in keeping with higher demand of attentional resources for this unusual locomotor behaviour. Conversely, motorized TW improves the cognitive performance likely because it reduces the attentional cost of walking. Gait training by TW might improve automaticity in patients with movement disorders.     

The correlation between rhythm perception and gait characteristics at different rhythms among children with cerebral palsy and typically developing children

BackgroundIt has been shown that motor training while listening to constant rhythm, is associated with coupling between movement and rhythm. To gain a better understanding of how rhythm perception may affect gait in children with cerebral palsy (CP) it seems important first to assess rhythm perception (RP) in these children.Research questionTo describe and compare RP and step characteristics in children with CP and typically-developing (TD) children, and to assess the impact of RP on step characteristics during different rhythms.MethodsThe study included 24 children with CP, Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) levels I-II, age 7–12 years, who walk without assistive device, and 24 TD children matched for age and gender. RP was assessed by the perceptual beat alignment test (BAT). Gait parameters were recorded using a pressure-sensitive mat – the Gaitrite® system. Each participant walked on the mat at a comfortable walking pace and with the metronome set at 92.5 %, 100 % and 107.5 % of his preferred walking rhythm.ResultsNo significant difference in RP was noted between groups. Children with CP presented significantly larger step time and length variability. In TD children, those with better RP walked significantly slower, with lower step variability as compared to TD children with lower RP. Children in both groups, regardless of rhythm perception, successfully matched their cadence to the metronome's pace, both at the lower and higher rhythm, except TD children with lower rhythm perception, who failed to reduce their cadence sufficiently in the 92.5 % pace. Children with better RP in both groups changed more parameters in gait in response to rhythm changes.SignificanceAssessing RP may predict which parameters of gait are expected to change when employing a metronome during child's walk.     

A comparison of two walking while talking paradigms in aging

BackgroundOur study aimed to [1] compare dual-task costs in gait and cognitive performance during two dual-task paradigms: walking while reciting alternate letters of the alphabet (WWR) and walking while counting backward by sevens (WWC); [2] examine the relationship between the gait and cognitive interference tasks when performed concurrently.ScopeGait and cognitive performance were tested in 217 non-demented older adults (mean age 76 ± 8.8 years; 56.2% female) under single and dual-task conditions. Velocity (cm/s) was obtained using an instrumented walkway. Cognitive performance was assessed using accuracy ratio: [correct responses]/[total responses]. Linear mixed effects models revealed significant dual-task costs, with slower velocity (p < .01) and decreased accuracy ratio (p < .01) in WWR and WWC compared to their respective single task conditions. Greater dual-task costs in velocity (p < .01) were observed in WWC compared to WWR. Pearson correlations revealed significant and positive relationships between gait and cognitive performance in WWR and WWC (p < .01); increased accuracy ratio was associated with faster velocity.ConclusionsOur findings suggested that dual-task costs in gait increase as the complexity of the cognitive task increases. Furthermore, the positive association between the gait and cognitive tasks suggest that dual-task performance was not influenced by task prioritization strategies in this sample.     

Variability and symmetry of gait in early walkers with and without bilateral cerebral palsy

PurposeInvestigating gait characteristics during the early stages of walking in CP may contribute to the understanding of the development of impaired gait. The objective of this study was to investigate differences in the variability and symmetry of spatiotemporal gait characteristics during the early years of walking in children with bilateral spastic CP compared to children with similar amounts of walking experience and typical development (TD).MethodsThe spatiotemporal gait parameters of 31 children (15 with spastic CP, 16 with TD) who had an average of 28.5 (18.1 SD) months of walking experience were collected using an instrumented walkway.ResultsAll primary spatiotemporal parameters were reduced in the CP group, who also demonstrated greater stride-to-stride variability, compared to the TD group. There were no statistically significant differences in side-to-side symmetry between groups.ImplicationsClinical trials investigating gait interventions during the early years of walking in children with CP should be conducted to determine if treatment can reduce the functional limitations that are present during the emergence of walking skills. Further investigation should examine variability and symmetry in the kinematics, kinetics, and muscle activity patterns of early walkers with CP, and the effect of treatment on the variability and symmetry of walking characteristics.     

Motor adaptation to cognitive challenges and walking perturbations in healthy young adults

BackgroundCognitive-walking interference is manifested when simultaneously performing a cognitive task while walking. However, majority of the dual-task walking paradigms incorporated relatively short testing trials and were focused on posing a cognitive challenge by adding a secondary cognitive task but not introducing walking perturbations.Research questionHow do healthy young adults adapt to concurrent cognitive challenges and walking perturbations in terms of task prioritization and adaptation strategies to control walking stability?MethodsEighteen healthy young participants walked with and without (1) continuous treadmill platform sways (Perturbed and Unperturbed walking), and (2) performing one of the cognitive tasks: visual and auditory Stroop tasks, Clock task, Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test (PASAT), and walk only. Primary outcome measures included cognitive task performance, mediolateral dynamic margins of stability (MOS_ML), M-L local dynamic stability, stride time variability and the dual-task interference (DTI) on these measures.ResultsGait adjustments made during Perturbed walking did not improve walking stability but instead, showing more local instability and greater gait variability (all p < 0.001) than Unperturbed walking. Participants increased average MOS_ML during Clock and PASAT compared to Walk Only for both Perturbed and Unperturbed walking (THSD, p < 0.05). Participants had significantly less DTI on stride time variability during Unperturbed walking than during Perturbed walking (p < 0.001). Participants also had significantly greater DTI on PASAT performance during Perturbed than during Unperturbed walking (THSD, p < 0.05)SignificanceParticipants prioritized the walking task under a more challenging walking condition although the adjustments made during Perturbed walking were not sufficient to maintain a similar level of walking stability as Unperturbed walking. Adjustments to the cognitive-walking challenges were differed by the type of cognitive tasks. The current findings suggest that cognitive tasks involving both working memory and information processing or visuospatial recognition or attention have greater impact on gait especially during the perturbed walking condition.     

Selective motor control correlates with gait abnormality in children with cerebral palsy

Children with bilateral cerebral palsy (CP) commonly have limited selective motor control (SMC). This affects their ability to complete functional tasks. The impact of impaired SMC on walking has yet to be fully understood. Measures of SMC have been shown to correlate with specific characteristics of gait, however the impact of SMC on overall gait pattern has not been reported. This study explored SMC data collected as part of routine gait analysis in children with bilateral CP.As part of their clinical assessment, SMC was measured with the Selective Control Assessment of the Lower Extremities (SCALE) in 194 patients with bilateral cerebral palsy attending for clinical gait analysis at a single centre. Their summed SCALE score was compared with overall gait impairment, as measured by Gait Profile Score (GPS).Score on SCALE showed a significant negative correlation with GPS (r_s = −0.603, p < 0.001). Cerebral injuries in CP result in damage to the motor tracts responsible for SMC. Our results indicate that this damage is also associated with changes in the development of walking pattern in children with CP.     

Can people with Parkinson's disease improve dual tasking when walking?

BackgroundGait disorders in people with Parkinson's disease (PD) are accentuated when they perform another task simultaneously. This study examines whether practice enables people with PD to walk with large steps while performing added tasks, and to determine if training people with PD to walk with added working memory tasks leads to improvements in gait when walking and performing other tasks simultaneously.MethodsWalking patterns were recorded pre and post a 20 min dual task training session in 20 people with PD. Participants performed a series of 10 m walking trials under seven conditions: gait only, and with six different added tasks varying by task type (e.g. motor, cognitive), domain (e.g. postural, manual manipulation, language, calculation, auditory, visuospatial), and difficulty level. Dual task training aimed to improve step length while simultaneously undertaking a variety of language and counting working memory tasks that were different to those used in assessment.ResultsFollowing training, step length increased when performing five of the six added tasks, indicating transfer of dual task training when walking occurred across task types and domains. Improvements in gait speed occurred in three of the six added tasks. When other gait variables were examined, such as step length variability, few improvements with training were found.ConclusionsTraining can lead to larger steps when walking under dual task conditions in people with PD. The gait variable emphasised during dual task training appears to be an important factor in enabling the transfer of training improvements across tasks.     

Effect of dual-tasking on walking and cognitive demands in adults with Alzheimer’s dementia experienced in using a 4-wheeled walker

BackgroundLearning to walk with a 4-wheeled walker increases cognitive demands in people with Alzheimer’s dementia (AD). However, it is expected that experience will offset the increased cognitive demand. Current research has not yet evaluated gait in people with AD experienced in using a 4-wheeled walker under complex gait situations.Research questionWhat is the effect of dual-task testing on the spatial-temporal gait parameters and cognitive performance of people with AD experienced with a 4-wheeled walker?MethodsTwenty-three adults with mild to moderate AD (87.4 ± 6.2 years, 48 % female) and at least 6 months of walker use experience participated. Three walking configurations: 1) straight path (SP), 2) Groningen Meander Walking Test (GMWT), and 3) Figure of 8 path (F8) were tested under two walking conditions: 1) single-task (walking with aid) and 2) dual-task (walking with aid and completing a cognitive task). Tri-axial accelerometers collected velocity, cadence and stride time variability (STV). Gait and cognitive task cost were the percentage difference between single-task and dual-task conditions. Two-way repeated measures ANOVAs were used to answer the study question.ResultsA significant interaction between walking configuration and condition was found for velocity (p = 0.002, ω² = 0.36), cadence (p = 0.04, ω² = 0.15) and STV (p < 0.001, ω² = 0.53). Velocity and cadence decreased and STV increased with increasing walking configuration complexity and upon dual-tasking. Dual-task gait and cognitive task cost deteriorated in all walking configurations, but gait was prioritized in the GMWT and F8 configurations.Despite familiarity, experienced walker users with AD exhibit impaired gait when walking in complex situations which increases falls risk. Upon dual-task, individuals with AD self-prioritized a posture-first strategy in complex configurations.SignificanceDual-task testing in experienced users results in slower walking, fewer steps and increased STV, which increases falls risk in people with mild to moderate AD and becomes most pronounced in complex environments.     

The impact of motor task and environmental constraints on gait patterns during treadmill walking in a fully immersive virtual environment

BackgroundVirtual environments (VE) are increasingly used in rehabilitation settings for gait training, and positive effects are reported. However, little is known about how walking under environmental constraints and solving motor tasks in fully immersive VEs impact gait patterns.Research QuestionHow are gait patterns in healthy adults impacted by walking under environmental constraints and solving motor tasks on a treadmill, in a fully immersive VE?Methods29 healthy adults (age: 28.9±4.8 yrs) were included. Basic gait parameters (step length, cadence, walk ratio) and gait variability in the anteroposterior, mediolateral and vertical directions were measured using an inertial sensor attached to the lower back. A familiarisation treadmill walk >2 min was performed, followed by 200 m familiarisation walk in the VE with no task or environmental constraints The participants were then exposed to height, two grabbing tasks, a balancing task and narrow-path walking. Gait patterns were captured for 15–25 seconds during each of the conditions. The Simulator Sickness Questionnaire was completed before and after the session.ResultsGait regularity decreased when solving all the motor tasks, and under all the environmental constraints, except when being familiarised to height exposure, where regularity returned to pre-exposure levels. Step length and walk ratio decreased, and cadence increased during height exposure and while performing the grabbing tasks and the balancing task. The different tasks and environments appeared to have specific impact on gait patterns. There was no increase in simulator sickness symptoms.SignificanceGait patterns were impacted by solving motor tasks, and by environmental constraints, in healthy young adults, suggesting increased need for balance control. We suggest that VE-training on a treadmill holds potential for improving gait and balance control.     

Role of age and sex on dual tasking using a treadmill desk while performing cognitive tests

BackgroundTreadmill desks have been used extensively to increase physical activity and decrease sedentary time in the work environment. However, dual tasking, such as simultaneously walking and performing a cognitive task, may result in diminished performance in one or both tasks.Research questionDo age and sex impact ability to dual task while using a treadmill desk at a preferred walking speed?.MethodsA total of n = 24 younger (range of 18–24 years, mean age = 21.1 ± 1.6 years) and n = 25 older (range of 45–65 years, mean age = 53.0 ± 5.1 years) adults self-selected a comfortable walking speed ranging from 0.5 to 2.0 mph and performed the Stroop Color & Word test (measuring Inhibition) and the Sternberg Test of Working Memory (measuring Working Memory) while walking at their chosen speed on a treadmill desk and while seated. Testing was performed in two separate sessions with the order counterbalanced. Step length, stride length, gait cycle time, and coefficient of variation (CV) for each were measured using OptoGait software, and both reaction time and accuracy for the two cognitive tests were assessed. Dual Task Cost (DTC) was calculated by using the formula (Single task score – Dual task score)/Single task score)*100.ResultsYounger adults had faster reaction time compared to older adults for both Working Memory and Inhibition tests (p < 0.05), and both males and females had slower reaction time for the Working Memory test when seated compared to walking (p < 0.05). For DTC, older adults had greater stride length CV during the Working Memory task (32.0 % vs 19.6 %), and regardless of age or sex, DTC for gait was greater than for cognition.SignificanceThese data provide evidence that while aging does decrease reaction time while dual tasking, few age differences and no sex differences were found in dual task cost. However, dual tasking results in diminished gait DTC compared to cognition DTC regardless of age or sex.     

Kinematic adaptation and changes in gait classification in running compared to walking in children with unilateral spastic cerebral palsy

BackgroundClassification of sagittal gait patterns in unilateral spastic cerebral palsy (CP) provides direct implication for treatment. Five types are described: type 0 has minor gait deviation; type 1 has inadequate ankle dorsiflexion in swing; type 2 has inadequate ankle dorsiflexion throughout the gait cycle; types 3 and 4 have abnormal function of the knee and hip joint respectively. During gait analysis of children with unilateral spastic CP we observed frequently that a knee flexion deficit disappeared during running. That may have an impact on classification and treatment.Research questionDoes the classification type change while running and how do patients’ kinematics adapt to running?Methods64 children with unilateral spastic CP were classified using instrumented gait analysis for walking and running. The deviation of four parameters from typically developing children (TD) were used to distinguish between types: peak ankle dorsiflexion in swing for type 1, peak ankle dorsiflexion in stance for type 2, knee range of motion for type 3, and hip range of motion for type 4. A three-factor ANOVA for factors group (CP/TD), locomotion (walk/run) and limb side (in-/uninvolved) was conducted.ResultsThe number of patients with type 1, 3 and 4 decreased considerably from walking to running, whereas, the number of type 0 and 2 patients increased. The ANOVA showed that three of four parameters of patients’ pathologic limb adapt similarly to TD to running, except for the ankle dorsiflexion in stance.SignificanceRunning shows that there is a natural way to resolve abnormalities. Therefore, recommended treatments of hip and knee joint abnormalities based on the walking classification can be questioned and additional running analysis may be important for surgical decision making.     

Cognitive and visual demands,but not gross motor demand,of concurrent smartphone use affect laboratory and free-living gait among young and older adults

BackgroundAs smartphones are an integral part of daily activities, understanding the underlying mechanism associated with concurrent cell phone use while walking may help reduce the risks of injury.Research questionThis study examined the effect of cognitive, visual, and gross motor demands while using a phone during gait among young and older adults in the laboratory and free-living environments.MethodsTwelve young and twelve older adults walked along a 10-m walkway under five conditions: single-task walking (Walk), walking and bi-manually holding a phone (Walk-Hold), walking while looking at a phone held in front of the participants (Walk-Look), walking while answering questions (Walk-Answer), and walking while texting (Walk-Text). All conditions were performed in laboratory and free-living environments. Gait velocity, step time, step length, and cadence were obtained using a smartphone with a built-in accelerometer attached to the body. The dual-task cost (DTC) was also assessed. A three-way ANOVA was utilized for all parameters.ResultsWhile no three-way interactions were found for any parameter, group × condition interactions were significant for gait velocity, step time, step length, cadence and their corresponding DTC. Decreased gait velocity, step length and cadence, with increased step time was demonstrated during Walk-Look, Walk-Answer, and Walk-Text, compared to Walk and Walk-Hold. While older adults markedly changed their gait during Walk-Answer and Walk-Text, these changes were less pronounced among young adults.SignificanceVisual and cognitive demand while concurrently using a phone influenced gait, especially among the elderly. Environment did not accentuate gait alterations during concurrent phone use. Therefore, smartphone technology should be developed to detect dual-task walking and temporarily modify functionality to reduce risk of injury from divided attention.