Financial Effect of Unbundling Moderate Sedation from Procedural Codes in Radiology

PurposeTo assess and quantify the financial effect of unbundling newly unbundled moderate sedation codes across major payors at an academic radiology practice.Materials and MethodsBilling and reimbursement data for 23 months of unbundled moderate sedation codes were analyzed for reimbursement rates and trends. This included 10,481 and 28,189 units billed and $443,257 and $226,444 total receipts for codes 99152 (initial 15 minutes of moderate sedation) and 99153 (each subsequent 15 minute increment of moderate sedation), respectively. Five index procedures—(i) central venous port placement, (ii) endovascular tumor embolization, (iii) tunneled central venous catheter placement, (iv) percutaneous gastrostomy placement, and (v) percutaneous nephrostomy placement—were identified, and moderate sedation reimbursements for Medicare and the dominant private payor were calculated and compared to pre-bundled reimbursements. Revenue variation models across different patient insurance mixes were then created using averages from 4 common practice settings among radiologists (independent practices, all hospitals, safety-net hospitals, and non-safety-net hospitals).ResultsDepartmental reimbursement for unbundled moderate sedation in FY2018 and FY2019 totaled $669,701.34, with high per-unit variability across payors, especially for code 99153. Across the 5 index procedures, moderate sedation reimbursement decreased 1.3% after unbundling and accounted for 3.9% of procedural revenue from Medicare and increased 11.9% and accounted for 5.5% of procedural revenue from the dominant private payor. Between different patient insurance mix models, estimated reimbursement from moderate sedation varied by as much as 29.9%.ConclusionsDepartmental reimbursement from billing the new unbundled moderate sedation codes was sizable and heterogeneous, highlighting the need for consistent and accurate reporting of moderate sedation. Total collections vary by case mix, patient insurance mix, and negotiated reimbursement rates.     

Endovascular Treatment of Malignant Superior Vena Cava Syndrome through Upper-Limb Access: A Comparison between Venous-Dedicated and Conventional Stents

PurposeTo retrospectively evaluate the technical and clinical outcomes of superior vena cava (SVC) stent placement through upper-limb venous access in malignant SVC syndrome (SVCS) and compare the efficacy of different nitinol stent types.Materials and MethodsBetween 2006 and 2018, 156 patients (132 male; mean age, 62 y; age range, 33–81 y) underwent SVC stent placement for malignant obstructions through upper-limb venous access with 1 of 3 types of nitinol stent: 1 venous-dedicated (Sinus-XL stent) and 2 non–venous-dedicated (E-Luminexx Vascular Stent and Protégé GPS). Cases of common femoral vein access or non-nitinol stents were excluded from further analysis. The mean duration of follow-up was 8 mo.ResultsTechnical success was achieved in 99.3% of cases. One patient died during the procedure as a result of cardiac tamponade. Balloon predilation was performed in 10 patients and postdilation in 126. Mean procedural time was 34.4 min (range, 18–80 min). Overall survival rates were 92.3%, 57.3%, and 26.8%, and overall primary patency rates were 94.5%, 84.8% and 79.6%, at 1, 6, and 12 mo, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in primary patency rates between venous- and non–venous-dedicated stents or among different Stanford SVCS grading groups (P > .05).ConclusionsSVC stent placement through an upper-limb approach is a safe, fast, and effective technique. There is no evident benefit of venous-dedicated vs non–venous-dedicated stents in the treatment of malignant SVCS.     

Nationwide Trends in Catheter-Directed Therapy Utilization for the Treatment of Lower Extremity Deep Vein Thrombosis in Medicare Beneficiaries

PurposeTo determine overall and provider specialty trends in the use of catheter-directed therapy for lower extremity deep vein thrombosis (DVT) treatment in the Medicare population.Materials and MethodsUsing data obtained from 2007–2017 Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services 5% research identifiable files, all claims associated with acute and chronic lower extremity DVT were identified. The annual volume of 2 services—venous percutaneous transluminal thrombectomy (current procedural terminology [CPT] code 37187) and venous infusion for thrombolysis (CPT code 37201 from 2007 to 2012 and CPT code 37212 from 2013 to 2017)—was examined for trends in DVT intervention. Utilization rates based on region and the place of service were calculated. The results were further categorized based on primary operator type (radiology, cardiology, surgery, and other).ResultsThe total number of DVT interventions increased over time, with 4.27 service counts per 100,000 beneficiaries in 2007 increasing to 13.4 by 2017, a growth rate of 12.09%. Radiologists performed the majority of interventions each year, except in 2013, in which they performed 46.6% of interventions, whereas surgeons and cardiologists combined performed the other 53.4%. In 2017, radiologists performed 7.56 services per 100,000 beneficiaries, which was 56.8% of the total count, more than those performed by surgeons, cardiologists, and unspecified providers combined.ConclusionsCatheter-directed therapy is increasingly being used for the treatment of DVT, with its use undergoing a nearly 12-fold increase from 2007 to 2017 in the Medicare population. Radiologists remained the dominant provider of these services throughout the majority of study period, with a relative reduction in market share from 72% in 2007 to 57% in 2017.     

Lower Extremity Venous Stent Placement: A Large Retrospective Single-Center Analysis

PurposeTo study short-term and long-term outcomes of lower extremity venous stents placed at a single center and to characterize changes in vein diameter achieved by stent placement.Materials and MethodsA database of all patients who received lower extremity venous stents between 1996 and 2018 revealed 1,094 stents were placed in 406 patients (172 men, 234 women; median age, 49 y) in 513 limbs, including patients with iliocaval stents (9.4% acute thrombosis, 65.3% chronic thrombosis, 25.3% nonthrombotic lesions). Primary, primary assisted, and secondary patency rates were assessed for lower extremity venous stents at 1, 3, and 5 years using Kaplan-Meier analyses and summary statistics. Subset analyses and Cox regression were performed to identify risk factors for patency loss. Vein diameters and Villalta scores before and up to 12 months after stent placement were compared. Complication and mortality rates were calculated.ResultsPrimary, primary assisted, and secondary patency rates at 5 years were 57.3%, 77.2%, and 80.9% by Kaplan-Meier methods and 78.6%, 90.3%, and 92.8% by summary statistics. Median follow-up was 199 days (interquartile range, 35.2–712.0 d). Patency rates for the subset of patients (n = 46) with ≥ 5 years of follow-up (mean ± SD 9.1 y ± 3.4) were nearly identical to cohort patency rates at 5 years. Patients with inferior vena cava stent placement (hazard ratio 2.11, P < .0001) or acute thrombosis (hazard ratio 3.65, P < .0001) during the index procedure had significantly increased risk of losing primary patency status. Vein diameters were significantly greater after stent placement. There were no instances of stent fracture, migration, or structural deformities. In patients with chronic deep vein thrombosis, Villalta scores significantly decreased after stent placement (from 15.7 to 7.4, P < .0001). Perioperative mortality was < 1%, and major perioperative complication rate was 3.7%.ConclusionsCavo-ilio-femoral stent placement for venous occlusive disease achieves improvement of vein disease severity scores, increase in treated vein diameters, and satisfactory long-term patency rates.     

Trends in Percutaneous Embolization Procedures by Radiologists and Other Specialists

PurposeTo evaluate utilization trends in percutaneous embolization among radiologists and nonradiologist providers.Materials and MethodsThe nationwide Medicare Part B fee-for-service databases for 2005–2016 were used to evaluate percutaneous embolization codes. Six codes describing embolization procedures were reviewed. Physician providers were grouped as radiologists, vascular surgeons, cardiologists, nephrologists, other surgeons, and all others.ResultsThe total volume of Medicare percutaneous embolization procedures increased from 20,262 in 2005 to 45,478 in 2016 (+125%). Radiologists performed 13,872 procedures in 2005 (68% of total volume) and 33,254 in 2016 (73% of total volume), a 140% increase in volume. While other specialists also increased the number of cases performed from 2005 to 2016, radiologists strongly predominated, performing 87% of arterial and 30% of venous procedures in 2016, more than any other single specialty. In 2014 and 2015, a sharp increase in venous embolization cases performed by nonradiologists preceded a sharp decrease in 2016, likely the result of complicated billing codes for venous procedures. Radiologists maintained a steady upward trend in the number of cases they performed during those years.ConclusionsThe volume of percutaneous embolization procedures performed in the Medicare population increased from 2005 to 2016, reflecting a trend toward minimally invasive intervention. In 2016, radiologists performed nearly 10 times more arterial embolization procedures than the second highest specialty and more venous embolization procedures than any other single specialty.     

Comparison between Suprapapillary and Transpapillary Uncovered Self-Expandable Metallic Stent Placement for Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma

PurposeTo compare the effectiveness, adverse events (AEs), stent patency, and patient survival with suprapapillary and transpapillary uncovered self-expandable metallic stent placement for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma.Materials and MethodsA single-center retrospective study of 54 patients with inoperable perihilar cholangiocarcinoma who underwent percutaneous transhepatic biliary stent placement between January 1, 2019, and August 31, 2021, was conducted. According to stent location, the patients were classified into 2 groups: suprapapillary (S) and transpapillary (T). Demographic data, Bismuth-Corlette classification, type and location of the stent, laboratory data, postprocedural AEs, procedural success, stent occlusion, reintervention rate, and mortality were compared between the groups.ResultsStent placement was suprapapillary in 13 (24.1%) patients and transpapillary in 41 (75.9%) patients. Mean age was higher in Group T (78 vs 70.5 years; P = .046). Stent occlusion rates were similar in the 2 groups (Group S, 23.8%; Group T, 19.5%), as were AE rates, the most common being cholangitis (Group S, 23.1%; Group T, 24.4%). There were no significant differences in revision rate (Group S, 7.7%; Group T, 12.2%) and 30-day mortality rate (Group S, 15.4%; Group T, 19.5%). Ninety-day mortality rate was statistically significantly higher in Group T (46.3% vs 15.4%; P = .046). Preprocedural bilirubin level was higher in Group T, as were postprocedural leukocyte and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels.ConclusionsSuprapapillary and transpapillary stent placement procedures were similar in terms of procedural success, occlusion rate, revision rate, postprocedural AEs, and 30-day mortality. Ninety-day mortality rate and postprocedural leukocyte and CRP levels were higher in Group T, although these patients were also older and had higher preprocedural bilirubin levels.     

Impact of Renal Function Trajectory on Renal Replacement Therapy and Mortality Risk after Renal Artery Revascularization

PurposeTo determine the impact of renal function trajectory, defined as the change in renal function over time before and after renal artery stent placement, on long-term risk for renal replacement therapy (RRT) and mortality.Materials and MethodsEstimated glomerular filtration rates (eGFRs) 6–12 months before renal artery stent placement, at the time of intervention, and 6–12 months after intervention were determined in 398 patients. The effect of eGFR change before and after renal artery stent placement was calculated. Cox proportional-hazards ratio was used to determine the risks for RRT and all-cause mortality.ResultsThe risk for RRT was significantly influenced by eGFR change from the time of intervention to follow-up at 6–12 month after treatment (P = .02). In addition, among patients with a postintervention eGFR ≤ 40 mL/min/1.73 m², for every 1 unit of eGFR increase, there was a significant decrease in RRT and all-cause mortality (P < .001 and P < .001, respectively). Secondary parameters that increased RRT risk included diabetes at the time of intervention (P = .03), increased baseline proteinuria (P < .001), and stage 4 or 5 chronic kidney disease (CKD; P = .01 and P = .003, respectively). Multivariate analysis demonstrated higher all-cause mortality rates among patients with diabetes at the time of intervention (P = .009).ConclusionsPostintervention eGFR trajectory improvement approaching 40 mL/min/1.73 m² was associated with decreased RRT and mortality risk. These findings suggest that patients with advanced CKD and renal artery stenosis may benefit from revascularization regardless of their preinterventional renal function measurement.     

Venous Biomechanics of Angioplasty and Stent Placement: Implications of the Poisson Effect

PurposeTo characterize the Poisson effect in response to angioplasty and stent placement in veins and identify potential implications for guiding future venous-specific device design.Materials and MethodsIn vivo angioplasty and stent placement were performed in 3 adult swine by using an established venous stenosis model. Iron particle endothelium labeling was performed for real-time fluoroscopic tracking of the vessel wall during intervention. A finite-element computational model of a vessel was created with ADINA software (version 9.5) with arterial and venous biomechanical properties obtained from the literature to compare the response to radial expansion.ResultsIn vivo angioplasty and stent placement in a venous stenosis animal model with iron particle endothelium labeling demonstrated longitudinal foreshortening that correlated with distance from the center of the balloon (R² = 0.87) as well as adjacent segment narrowing that correlated with the increase in diameter of the treated stenotic segment (R² = 0.89). Finite-element computational analysis demonstrated increased Poisson effect in veins relative to arteries (linear regression coefficient slope comparison, arterial slope 0.033, R² = 0.9789; venous slope 0.204, R² = 0.9975; P < .0001) as a result of greater longitudinal Young modulus in veins compared with arteries.ConclusionsClinically observed adjacent segment narrowing during venous angioplasty and stent placement is a result of the Poisson effect, with redistribution of radially applied force to the longitudinal direction. The Poisson effect is increased in veins relative to arteries as a result of unique venous biomechanical properties, which may be relevant to consider in the design of future venous interventional devices.     

First-in-Human Study with Eight Patients Using an Absorbable Vena Cava Filter for the Prevention of Pulmonary Embolism

PurposeTo prospectively evaluate the initial human experience with an absorbable vena cava filter designed for transient protection from pulmonary embolism (PE).Materials and MethodsThis was a prospective, single-arm, first-in-human study of 8 patients with elevated risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Seven absorbable IVC filters (made of polydioxanone that breaks down into H₂O and CO₂ in 6 mo) were placed prophylactically before orthopedic (n = 5) and gynecologic (n = 2) surgeries, and 1 was placed in a case of deep vein thrombosis. Subjects underwent CT cavography and abdominal radiography before and 5, 11, and 36 weeks after filter placement to assess filter migration, embolization, perforation, and caval thrombosis and/or stenosis. Potential PE was assessed immediately before and 5 weeks after filter placement by pulmonary CT angiography.ResultsNo symptomatic PE was reported throughout the study or detected at the planned 5-week follow-up. No filter migration was detected based on the fixed location of the radiopaque markers (attached to the stent section of the filter) relative to the vertebral bodies. No filter embolization or caval perforation was detected, and no caval stenosis was observed. Throughout the study, no filter-related adverse events were reported.ConclusionsImplantation of an absorbable vena cava filter in a limited number of human subjects resulted in 100% clinical success. One planned deployment was aborted as a result of stenotic pelvic veins, resulting in 89% technical success. No PE or filter-related adverse events were observed.     

Comparison of Anticoagulation Regimens Following Stent Placement for Nonthrombotic Lower Extremity Venous Disease

PurposeTo determine whether subtherapeutic anticoagulation regimens are noninferior to therapeutic anticoagulation regimens following stent placement for nonthrombotic lower extremity venous disease.Materials and MethodsFifty-one consecutive patients (88% women; mean age, 44 years) who underwent stent placement for nonthrombotic lower extremity venous disease between 2002 and 2016 were retrospectively identified. The patients were divided into 2 cohorts: those who received prophylactic enoxaparin or no anticoagulation (subtherapeutic) after the procedure and those who received therapeutic doses of anticoagulation with enoxaparin, warfarin, and/or rivaroxaban (therapeutic) after the procedure. Baseline demographic characteristics, procedure characteristics, and outcomes were compared between the 2 groups using the Student t test, Fisher exact test, and χ² test. The subtherapeutic and therapeutic anticoagulation groups did not differ significantly in the baseline demographic characteristics (eg, sex, race, and age) or procedure characteristics (eg, number of stents placed, stent brand, stent diameter, etc).ResultsThe mean clinical follow-up time was 4.4 years (range, 0–16.3 years). There were no thrombotic adverse events or luminal obstructions due to in-stent restenosis in either group. There were 5 minor bleeding adverse effects in the therapeutic group and no bleeding adverse effects in the subtherapeutic group (P = .051). There were no statistically significant differences in subjective symptom improvement (P = .75).ConclusionsIn this retrospective cohort, the subtherapeutic and therapeutic anticoagulation regimens produced equivalent outcomes in terms of adverse event rates, reintervention rates, and symptomatic improvement, suggesting that therapeutic doses of anticoagulation do not improve outcomes compared with subtherapeutic anticoagulation regimens following nonthrombotic venous stent placement.     

Predictive Factors for Restenosis Following Stent-Supported Endovascular Therapy with Intravascular Ultrasound Evaluation for Femoropopliteal Chronic Total Occlusion

PurposeTo determine the predictive factors for in-stent restenosis (ISR) following stent-supported endovascular therapy (EVT) with intravascular ultrasound (US) evaluation for femoropopliteal chronic total occlusion.Materials and MethodsThis was a single-center, retrospective, observational study. The study included 276 lesions in 251 patients who underwent stent-supported EVT with intravascular ultrasound evaluation for femoropopliteal chronic total occlusion from July 2012 to June 2019. The wire passage route was assessed using intravascular US, and lesions were classified accordingly into 2 groups: intraluminal and subintimal passage. In this study, the intraluminal group was further divided into 3 subgroups by severity of calcification: none, <180°, and ≥180° circumferential. The subintimal group was further divided into 2 subgroups: subintimal passage without or with calcification. The primary outcome measure was ISR. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to determine the association of clinical characteristics with ISR rates.ResultsThe mean follow-up period was 19 months ±16, during which time ISR was observed in 31% of lesions. After multivariate analysis, an increased degree of plaque burden (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.101) and subintimal passage with calcification (HR = 3.408) were associated with an increased risk of ISR; a larger distal external elastic membrane area (HR = 0.898) and use of a stent graft (HR = 0.130) were significantly associated with a reduced risk of ISR.ConclusionsThis study revealed that factors associated with ISR after stent-supported EVT with intravascular US evaluation were distal external elastic membrane area, plaque burden, subintimal passage with calcification, and use of a stent graft.     

Factors Influencing in-Stent Occlusion after Femoropopliteal Artery Stent Placement with Intravascular Ultrasound Evaluation

PurposeTo investigate the rate and predictors of in-stent occlusion by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) following femoropopliteal artery stent placement.Materials and MethodsFrom July 2012 to June 2016, this study retrospectively investigated 191 cases of de novo femoropopliteal artery lesions (lesion length, 170 ± 97 mm; chronic total occlusion, 51%) evaluated by IVUS in 162 patients with peripheral artery disease (with critical limb ischemia of 27%) who underwent endovascular therapy using self-expanding nitinol stents. Examination by IVUS was performed to record data for vessel characteristics immediately after wire crossing and at the end of the procedure. The primary outcome measurement was the occurrence of in-stent occlusion, defined as the absence of blood flow at the treatment site by duplex ultrasonography. Predictors for in-stent occlusion were also evaluated by multivariate analysis.ResultsIn-stent occlusion was observed in 15% (n = 28) of lesions, and the mean follow-up time was 19 ± 13 months. After multivariate analysis, it was found that plaque burden ≥60% after stent placement (P < .001), female gender (P = .002), and Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC) II classification C and D lesions (P = .047) were significantly associated with the occurrence of in-stent occlusion.ConclusionsPlaque burden ≥60% after stent placement, female gender, and TASC II classification C/D lesions were significantly associated with the occurrence of in-stent occlusion after femoropopliteal artery stent placement as evaluated by IVUS.     

Hepatic Artery Embolization for Postoperative Hemorrhage: Importance of Arterial Collateral Vessels and Portal Venous Impairment

PurposeTo investigate the association between hepatic ischemic complications and hepatic artery (HA) collateral vessels and portal venous (PV) impairment after HA embolization for postoperative hemorrhage.Materials and MethodsFrom October 2003 to November 2019, 42 patients underwent HA embolization for postoperative hemorrhage. HA collateral vessels were classified according to visualization after embolization (grade 1, none; grade 2, 1–4 segmental HA; and grade 3, ≥4 segmental HA). Transhepatic portal vein stent placements were performed in the same session for 5 patients (11.9%) with poor HA collateral vessels (grade 1 or 2) and compromised PV flow (>70% stenosis). Hepatic ischemic complications were analyzed for relevance to HA collateral vessels and PV compromise.ResultsAfter HA embolization, HA flow was found to be preserved (grade 3) through intra- and/or extrahepatic collateral vessels in 23 patients (54.8%), and hepatic complications did not occur regardless of PV flow status (0%). Of the 19 patients (45.2%) with poor HA collateral vessels (grade 1 or 2), segmental hepatic infarction occurred in 2 of 15 patients (13.3%) with preserved PV flow (10 naïve and 5 stented). The remaining 4 patients with poor HA collateral vessels and untreated compromised PV flow experienced multisegmental hepatic infarction (n = 3) or hepatic failure (n = 1) (100%) (P < .005).ConclusionsAfter HA embolization, preserved HA flow (≥4 segmental HA) lowered the risk of hepatic complications regardless of the PV flow. Based on these findings, transhepatic PV stent placement seems to be an effective intervention for the prevention of hepatic complications in cases of poor HA collateral vessels and compromised PV flow.     

Predictors of Disease Recurrence after Venoplasty and Stent Placement for May–Thurner Syndrome

PurposeTo identify factors independently associated with disease recurrence after venoplasty and stent placement for May–Thurner syndrome (MTS).Materials and MethodsFifty-nine consecutive patients (age, 47 y ± 15; 93% female) were identified who had undergone endovascular stent placement for MTS. Patient charts were reviewed for demographic data, risk factors for venous thrombosis, comorbidities, and venous inflow or outflow at first follow-up (3 wk to 6 mo after treatment). Logistic regression was used to identify independent predictors of symptom recurrence or repeat intervention, and multivariate analysis of variance and receiver operator characteristic curve analysis were used to assess relationships between degrees of in-stent stenosis and other variables in the 73% of patients with available cross-sectional imaging. Median follow up was 20.7 months (interquartile range, 4.7–49.5 mo).ResultsAll procedures were technically successful. Disease recurrence, defined as symptom recurrence following initial postprocedural resolution, was observed in 38% of patients. No preprocedural variable was found to be independently predictive of disease recurrence; however, poor venous inflow or outflow were both strongly associated with recurrent disease, with adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals of 38.02 (3.76–384.20; P = .002) and 7.00 (1.15–42.71; P = .04), respectively. Higher degrees of in-stent stenosis were also associated with symptom recurrence, with an area under the curve of 0.93 (P = .000002) and 39%–41% stenosis being 78%–83% sensitive and 88%–92% specific for symptom recurrence.ConclusionsThese results suggest that cross-sectional imaging can help differentiate patients in whom closer follow-up may be warranted after venoplasty and stent placement for MTS and also guide counseling regarding prognosis.     

Automated Quantitative Imaging Measurements of Disease Severity in Patients with Nonthrombotic Iliac Vein Compression

PurposeAn automated segmentation technique (AST) for computed tomography (CT) venography was developed to quantify measures of disease severity before and after stent placement in patients with left-sided nonthrombotic iliac vein compression.Materials and MethodsTwenty-one patients with left-sided nonthrombotic iliac vein compression who underwent venous stent placement were retrospectively identified. Pre- and poststent CT venography studies were quantitatively analyzed using an AST to determine leg volume, skin thickness, and water content of fat. These measures were compared between diseased and nondiseased limbs and between pre- and poststent images, using patients as their own controls. Additionally, patients with and without postthrombotic lesions were compared.ResultsThe AST detected significantly increased leg volume (12,437 cm³ vs 10,748 cm³, P < .0001), skin thickness (0.531 cm vs 0.508 cm, P < .0001), and water content of fat (8.2% vs 5.0%, P < .0001) in diseased left limbs compared with the contralateral nondiseased limbs, on prestent imaging. After stent placement in the left leg, there was a significant decrease in the water content of fat in the right (4.9% vs 2.7%, P < .0001) and left (8.2% vs 3.2%, P < .0001) legs. There were no significant changes in leg volume or skin thickness in either leg after stent placement. There were no significant differences between patients with or without postthrombotic lesions in their poststent improvement across the 3 measures of disease severity.ConclusionsASTs can be used to quantify measures of disease severity and postintervention changes on CT venography for patients with lower extremity venous disease. Further investigation may clarify the clinical benefit of such technologies.     

Endovascular Lymphatic Decompression via Thoracic Duct Stent Placement for Refractory Ascites in Patients with Cirrhosis: A Pilot Study

PurposeTo evaluate the technical and clinical success of endovascular lymphatic decompression via thoracic duct (TD) stent placement in patients with cirrhosis with refractory ascites.Materials and MethodsNine patients (6 men and 3 women; median age, 66 [interquartile range {IQR}, 65–68] years; range, 62–78 years) who underwent TD stent placement for refractory ascites with contraindications for liver transplantation and transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt creation were included in this retrospective study. TD stent placement was performed under local anesthesia using retrograde access from the venous system. Self-expanding stents from 5 to 8 mm in diameter were used and extended into the subclavian vein by approximately 1 cm. Technical (correct positioning of the stent) and clinical success (no more requirement of paracentesis) were evaluated. In addition, the safety of the procedure and TD pressure evolution were evaluated.ResultsThe technical success rate was 100%, and 3 (33%) patients reported clinical success. Five (56%) patients reported 7 minor adverse events (Grade I), among which 2 TD perforations were induced by stent angioplasty, with no clinical manifestation or treatment required. The median TD pressure decreased from 19 mm Hg (IQR, 11–24 mm Hg) at the beginning of the procedure to 6 mm Hg (IQR, 5–11 mm Hg) after TD stent placement. The median survival time after the procedure was 7.1 months.ConclusionsEndovascular lymphatic decompression via TD stent placement is feasible and safe and was effective on ascites in some patients with cirrhosis with refractory ascites.     

Evaluation of Technical Success,Efficacy, and Safety of Portomesenteric Venous Intervention following Nontransplant Hepatobiliary or Pancreatic Surgery

PurposeTo evaluate technical success, efficacy and safety of portomesenteric venous (PMV) intervention for PMV stenosis or occlusion following nontransplant hepatobiliary or pancreatic (HPB) surgery.Materials and MethodsA retrospective review identified 42 patients (mean age 60 y) with PMV stenosis (n = 33; 79%) or occlusion (n = 9; 21%) who underwent attempted PMV intervention following HPB surgery between June 1, 2011, and April 1, 2018. Main outcomes were technical success, primary patency rates, and complications. Technical success was compared by venous pathology and primary PMV patency based on anticoagulation status after the procedure using Fisher exact test. Rates of primary patency by stent group were estimated using Kaplan-Meier method.ResultsTechnical success was 91% (n = 38/42) and significantly higher in patients with stenosis (n = 33/33; 100%) vs occlusion (n = 5/9; 56%) (P = .001). Primary presenting symptom resolved in 28 (87%) patients, including 6 (100%) patients with gastrointestinal bleeding. At mean imaging follow-up of 8.6 months ± 8.8, primary stent patency was 76%. There was no significant difference in primary stent patency based on anticoagulation status after the procedure (P = .48). There were 2 (4.8%) periprocedural complications.ConclusionsPortomesenteric venoplasty and stent placement following nontransplant HPB surgery is safe with a high rate of technical success if performed before chronic occlusion.     

Imaging-Guided De Novo Retrograde Ureteral Access and Stent Placement without Cystoscopy in Women

PurposeTo evaluate the feasibility of a new technique for imaging-guided de novo retrograde ureteral double J (DJ) stent placement without cystoscopy in women.Materials and MethodsEighty-four women referred for ureteral stent placement between April 2019 and January 2022 were included. In all the patients, the initial attempt for stent placement was performed in a retrograde fashion. Successful ureteral catheterization and DJ stent placement were considered as technical success. The fluoroscopy time required to catheterize the ureter and that for the entire procedure were recorded. Factors affecting the technical success rate and fluoroscopy time were examined.ResultsA total of 108 ureteral stent placement procedures in 84 women, with a mean age of 57.5 years (range, 19–85 years), were performed. The most common underlying pathologies were cervical (n = 33, 31%) and ovarian (n = 32, 30%) carcinomas. The most commonly involved segments of the ureter were the lower half (n = 44, 40%) and trigone (n = 39, 36%). The technical success rate was 81.5%, and it reached 93% in the case of lower-half ureteral obstruction. Distorted trigonal anatomy caused by external compression of the bladder wall by a mass was associated with a higher rate of technical failure (90.6% vs 47.8%; P < .001). The use of ultrasound guidance to guide the sheath to the ureteral orifice allowed for a significant decrease in the fluoroscopy time for ureteral catheterization (4.6 minutes ± 3.91 vs 2.26 minutes ± 2.32; P = .003) and that for the entire procedure (9.42 minutes ± 4.95 vs 5.93 minutes ± 4.06; P = .001).ConclusionsImaging-guided de novo retrograde ureteral catheterization and stent placement can be successfully performed in a high percentage of patients within a reasonable fluoroscopy time without the need for cystoscopy in women.     

Stent Graft Placement for the Treatment of Hepatic Artery Injury in Patients with Cancer: Primary Patency and Clinical Outcomes

PurposeTo evaluate the safety, primary patency, and clinical outcomes of hepatic artery stent graft (SG) placement for vascular injuries.Materials and MethodsPatients treated with hepatic arterial SG placement for vascular injuries between September 2018 and September 2021 were reviewed. Data on demographic characteristics, indication, stent graft characteristics, antiplatelet/anticoagulant use, clinical success rate, complications, and type of follow-up imaging were collected. Follow-up images were reviewed by 2 independent reviewers to assess primary patency. A time-to-event analysis was performed. The median duration of stent graft patency was estimated using Kaplan-Meier curves. A Cox proportional hazard model was used to evaluate factors related to stent graft patency.ResultsThirty-five patients were treated with hepatic arterial SG placement, 11 for postoperative bleeds and 24 for hepatic artery infusion pump catheter–related complications. Clinical success was achieved in 32 (91%) patients (95% CI, 77–98). The median primary patency was 87 days (95% CI, 73–293). Stent grafts of ≥6-mm diameter retained patency for a longer duration than that with stent grafts of smaller diameters (6 mm vs 5 mm; hazard ratio, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.14–0.88; P = .026; and 7+ mm vs 5 mm; hazard ratio, 0.27; 95% CI, 0.09–0.83; P = .023). Anticoagulation/antiplatelet regimen was not associated with increased stent graft patency duration (P > .05). Only minor complications were reported in 2 (5.7%) patients.ConclusionsStent grafts can be used safely and effectively to treat injuries of the hepatic artery. Stent graft diameters of ≥6 mm seem to provide more durable patency.     

Vascular Pathology and Impact of Stent Eccentricity for Stent Restenosis in Femoropopliteal Endovascular Therapy

PurposeTo explore the clinical features associated with stent eccentricity and reveal the impact of stent eccentricity on the risk of 1-year restenosis after femoropopliteal stent implantation for symptomatic atherosclerotic peripheral artery disease (PAD).Materials and MethodsThe clinical database of a multicenter prospective study was used. It registered 2,018 limbs of 1,766 patients in whom intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-supported femoropopliteal endovascular therapy (EVT) for symptomatic atherosclerotic PAD was planned from November 2015 to June 2017. The study included 1,233 limbs of 1,088 patients implanted with a bare nitinol stent, drug-eluting stent (DES), or stent graft and administered ≥2 antithrombotic drugs. The stent eccentricity was evaluated using IVUS, calculated as [(maximum diameter) / (minimum diameter) ? 1] at the cross-sectional segment with the lowest lumen area after stent implantation.ResultsChronic total occlusion and bilateral arterial calcification (peripheral artery calcification scoring system Grades 3 and 4) were positively associated with stent eccentricity, whereas renal failure while receiving dialysis, DES use, and stent graft use were negatively associated with stent eccentricity (all P < .05). Stent eccentricity was associated with an increased risk of 1-year restenosis (odds ratio [OR], 1.18; 95% CI, 1.01–1.37; P = .034). However, after adjustment for lesion severity and implanted stent types, the association was no longer significant (OR, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.91–1.24; P = .43).ConclusionsStent eccentricity was not significantly associated with the risk of 1-year restenosis after femoropopliteal EVT.