Safety and tolerability of the tafluprost/timolol fixed combination for the treatment of glaucoma

Introduction: The preservative-free (PF) fixed combination (FC) of tafluprost 0.0015%/timolol 0.5% is the newest member of the prostaglandin analogue/timolol FC class.

Areas covered: In this review, we summarize data on safety and tolerability of this FC.

Expert opinion: The intraocular pressure-lowering effect of the tafluprost/timolol FC is approximately 30 – 35%, which is similar to that of the other members of the class. However, in contrast to most similar eye drops the tafluprost/timolol FC is manufactured in a PF, unit-dose pipette formulation. The PF nature eliminates preservative-related ocular surface changes, and improves tolerability. In clinical studies, the tafluprost/timolol FC was well tolerated. The side effects represented the typical side effects of the topical prostaglandin analogue class. The most common side effect, conjunctival hyperemia was mild, and occurred in only 6.4 – 8% of patients during 6 months of treatment. The figures for ocular irritation were also low (7.0 – 12.7%). The other side effects occurred only in very few patients. The frequency and severity of conjunctival hyperemia was lower than those published for most prostaglandin/timolol FCs. Thus, the main clinical advantage of this PF FC is improved tolerability, which may support treatment adherence of glaucoma patients.     

Efficacy and safety of tafluprost 0.0015% and timolol maleate 0.5% fixed combination in patients with ocular hypertension or open-angle glaucoma

Introduction: Lowering intraocular pressure (IOP) is at present the only therapeutic approach to the treatment of glaucoma proven to be successful. The choice of therapy must take into account efficacy, tolerability, safety, quality of life, adherence and cost. Monotherapy fails to achieve a satisfactory IOP reduction in 40 – 75% of glaucoma patients after > 2 years of therapy. So far, three prostaglandin/timolol maleate 0.5% fixed combinations (FCs) are available.

Areas covered: This review provides a background on the tafluprost–timolol FC (TTFC, Santen Oy) and its individual compounds. It summarizes the data on efficacy and safety, including comparative data with prostaglandin/timolol FCs already available.

Expert opinion: Tafluprost is a preservative-free prostaglandin analog with a similar IOP efficacy when compared with other prostaglandin analogs. However, its improved adverse effect profile seems to be beneficial in patients sensitive to preservatives. The preservative-free TTFC has no market authorization yet. Only one Phase III trial was published so far, but results are promising in terms of efficacy, tolerability and safety. It is likely that the TTFC will play a role in the treatment of open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension.     

Intraocular pressure decrease with preservative-free fixed and unfixed combination of tafluprost and timolol in pseudoexfoliative glaucoma

We investigated the intraocular pressure (IOP) lowering efficacy of preservative-free fixed and non-fixed combination of tafluprost 0.0015% and timolol 0.5% in pseudoexfoliative glaucoma (XFG). A per protocol worse eye analysis was made on all XFG patients who participated in a recent 6 month, prospective, randomized, double-masked, parallel group, multicenter phase III study. The mean time-wise IOP decreased by 8.62 to 10.25?mmHg (31.8 to 36.7%) in the fixed dose combination arm (15 patients) and by 5.38 to 11.35?mmHg (21.3 to 41.2%) in the non-fixed combination arm (13 patients), respectively (p?相似文献   

Preservative-free tafluprost/timolol fixed combination: comparative 24-h efficacy administered morning or evening in open-angle glaucoma patients

ABSTRACT

Background

Ideal dosing for the preservative-free (PF) tafluprost/timolol fixed combination (TTFC) remains to be elucidated.     

Latanoprost/timolol fixed combination for the treatment of glaucoma

Introduction: Glaucoma is a multifactorial optic neuropathy that can lead to progressive and irreversible loss of vision. Today there are > 60 million glaucoma patients worldwide, and this figure is rising due to aging. The aim of glaucoma therapy is to maintain the patient's visual function and quality of life by means of intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction, which currently constitutes the only evidence-based approach.

Areas covered: Briefly discussed are selected, recent evidence on antiglaucoma fixed combinations. Then the efficacy and safety of the latanoprost/timolol fixed combination is comprehensively reviewed.

Expert opinion: The latanoprost/timolol fixed combination can be a helpful stepwise therapeutic option in patients whose IOP is insufficiently controlled with monotherapy options. Future research is needed to better delineate the role and value of this medication in glaucoma therapy.     

A comparison of the effects of 0.005% latanoprost and fixed combination dorzolamide/timolol on retrobulbar haemodynamics in previously untreated glaucoma patients

ABSTRACT

Objective:?To assess the effects of dorzolamide/timolol fixed combination (DTFC) and latanoprost 0.005% on the retrobulbar haemodynamics and intraocular pressure (IOP) of open-angle glaucoma patients.

Methods:?22 consecutive subjects with newly diagnosed, open-angle glaucoma were included in this prospective, examiner masked, randomized, crossover study. The patients were randomized into two different arms. Peak systolic velocity (PSV), end-diastolic velocity (EDV), Pourcelot's resistance index (RI) and intraocular pressure (IOP) were determined at baseline and after 1 month of medical treatment with DTFC or latanoprost 0.005% in both groups. A 4‐week washout period, without medical treatment, between study arms was carried out. Primary efficacy variables were the PSV, EDV and RI in the ophthalmic artery (OA) and short posterior ciliary artery (SPCA) and intraocular pressure (IOP). Inter- and intra-group comparisons were performed with a one-way ANOVA test and two-tailed paired Student's t-test respectively.

Results:?Intraocular pressure (IOP) and colour Doppler imaging (CDI) measurements were similar at baseline. Compared to baseline and washout measurements, only the fixed combination dorzolamide/timolol significantly increased the EDV in the OA and in the SPCA, p = 0.00012 and p = 0.00012, respectively and decreased the resistance index in the ophthalmic and short posterior ciliary arteries, p = 0.00011 and p = 0.00031, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in the IOP lowering effect of either treatment.

Conclusion:?Over a treatment period of 1 month, only the fixed combination dorzolamide/timolol seems to have a vascular effect on retrobulbar vessels. Further research is necessary to confirm these results.     

Monitoring adherence rates in glaucoma patients using the Travatan Dosing Aid. A 6-month study comparing patients on travoprost 0.004% and patients on travoprost 0.004%/timolol 0.5% fixed combination

Objective: To assess adherence in glaucoma patients using the Travatan Dosing Aid (TDA); to record differences in adherence by age, sex, therapy, systemic therapies, years from diagnosis, type of therapy and intraocular pressure (IOP).

Research Design and Methods: Sixth-month cohort study; fifty-six Caucasian, primary open-angle glaucoma patients on travoprost (T) or travoprost/timolol fixed combination (TTFC) monotherapy were submitted to four visits: at baseline and months 1, 3 and 6 (M1, M3, M6). Adherence was recorded with TDA and classified as ‘high’ if greater than 90%. Self-reported and physician-presumed adherence data were collected. Kruskall-Wallis and Fisher's exact tests were applied.

Results: Thirty-two patients (54.2%) were treated with T. Age, sex, level of schooling, presence of systemic comorbidities, duration of current therapy and IOP were similar between T and TTFC. Seventeen subjects (30.3%) recorded high adherence at every visit, 13 (23.2%) at two visits, 26 (46.4%) otherwise. Adherence was maintained over time with a slight decrease from month 1 to month 6 without statistical differences within and between groups. Adherence was statistically influenced by age (p = 0.007) and duration of therapy (p = 0.004).

Conclusion: The typical nonadherent patient is elderly. TDA records indicate that only a minority of patients are really adherent: predictive models to screen for poor adherence are needed.     

From dorzolamide 2%/timolol 0.5% to brinzolamide 1%/timolol 0.5% fixed combination: a 6-month,multicenter, open-label tolerability switch study

Purpose: To assess ocular surface status and tolerability after switching glaucoma patients from dorzolamide/timolol to brinzolamide/timolol fixed combination (FC).

Methods: Six-month, multicenter, open-label, prospective study that switched 72 patients from dorzolamide/timolol to brinzolamide/timolol FC. Intraocular pressure (IOP), tear film break-up-time (TF-BUT), fluorescein staining and Glaucoma Symptom Scale (GSS) questionnaire were recorded at baseline and after 6 months.

Results: Median interquartile range (IQR) IOP was 16 (IQR 15 – 18) mmHg at baseline and 16 (15 – 17) mmHg and 6 months. TF-BUT significantly improved (p < 0.0001); the regression analysis found a negative association between TF-BUT changes and age at baseline and at month 6 (r = ?0.32; p = 0.0082 and r = ?0.31; p = 0.0085). Patients with no corneal fluorescein staining statistically increased after substitution (p = 0.04). Quality of life – as examined by the GSS symptoms (SYMP) score – statistically improved (p < 0.0001), revealing an association between GSS SYMP score and age [coefficient ?0.67, 95% confidence interval (CI) ?1.13 to ?0.21, p = 0.0005), superficial keratitis (coefficient ?8.26, 95% CI ?15.73 to ?0.80, p = 0.031) and TF-BUT (coefficient 4.94, 95% CI 1.71 to 8.17, p = 0.003).

Conclusion: Brinzolamide/timolol FC is associated with reduced topical discomfort and improved signs of ocular surface disease. The good tolerability and comfort of this FC might contribute to good patient adherence.     

A comparison of the safety and intraocular pressure lowering of bimatoprost/timolol fixed combination versus latanoprost/timolol fixed combination in patients with open-angle glaucoma*

ABSTRACT

Purpose: To compare the efficacy and tolerability of a once daily evening dose of the latanoprost/timolol fixed combination (LTFC) with that of a once-daily evening dose of the bimatoprost/timolol fixed combination (BTFC) in patients with open-angle glaucoma with elevated intrao­cular pressure (IOP) insufficiently responsive to mono­therapy with prostaglandin analogues/prostamides.

Design: Prospective, randomized, evaluator masked, single-center study.

Participants: 36 patients with a diagnosis of open-angle glaucoma, with or without pseudoexfoliation, and inadequate control of IOP, insufficiently responsive to monotherapy with prostaglandin analogues/prostamides.

Main outcome measure: The primary end-points were the change in IOP at 9:00?am from baseline to week 4, and the difference between treatment groups in the mean diurnal IOP reduction from baseline to week 4.

Results: BTFC provided significantly greater mean diurnal IOP reduction [mean (standard deviation)] 2.8 (0.9)?mmHg, compared with LTFC 2.1 (0.6)?mmHg, p = 0.0214. Both treatments significantly reduced the IOP from baseline at each IOP time-point measured, p < 0.0001, and for the mean diurnal IOP; p = 0.0049 for the LTFC, and p < 0.0001 for the BTFC. There were no significant differences in average hyperemia scores among groups, 1.25 (0.5) vs. 1.62 (0.69), p = 0.3835, for the LTFC and the BTFC, respectively.

Conclusions: The results of this study showed a significantly higher IOP-lowering effect of a once-daily evening dose of the BTFC compared to that of a once-daily evening administration of the LTFC.     

Fixed topical combinations in glaucomatous patients and ocular discomfort

Objective: The purpose of this study was to verify the ocular comfort of a fixed topical combination of brinzolamide 1% plus timolol 0.5% suspension vs. dorzolamide 2% plus timolol 0.5% solution, both preserved with benzalkonium chloride (BAK), in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) through subjective and objective methods. BAK is the most commonly used preservative in topical glaucoma medications.

Methods: 62 subjects were examined and included in the analysis. Each patient was asked to complete a questionnaire on symptoms (Ocular Surface Disease Index) and then underwent a series of examinations. The Ocular Protection Index evaluated the risk of damage to the ocular surface, and was expressed as the ratio between fluorescein breakup time and blinking interval. These and other analyses were repeated 30 days after instillation of the new eye drop treatment.

Results: The results demonstrated that patients enrolled with the preserved fixed combination of dorzolamide or brinzolamide represented a subgroup of patients in which the discomfort symptoms were supposedly justified by the presence of BAK used chronically in antihypertensive drops. Ocular discomfort scores were significantly higher with dorzolamide/timolol than brinzolamide/timolol (p < 0.0001).

Conclusions: This work shows the better tolerability of brinzolamide 1% plus timolol 0.5% suspension, compared with dorzolamide 2% plus timolol 0.5% solution. Fortunately, some of the adverse reactions induced by preserved eye drop glaucoma medication are reversible after removing the preservatives. Both the potential for added benefit and patient compliance should be considered when selecting ocular hypotensive therapy.     

Signs and symptoms of ocular surface status in glaucoma patients switched from timolol 0.5% to brinzolamide 1%/timolol 0.5% fixed combination: a 6-month efficacy and tolerability,multicenter, open-label prospective study

Purpose: To examine the impact of switching glaucoma patients from timolol 0.5% to brinzolamide 1%/timolol 0.5% fixed combination (Brinz/Tim FC) on quality of life and on ocular surface status; to assess efficacy after the switch.

Methods: 6-month, multicenter, open-label, prospective, switch study in 119 early to moderate glaucoma patients. Intraocular pressure (IOP), tear film break-up time (TF-BUT), fluorescein staining and Glaucoma Symptom Scale (GSS) questionnaire were recorded at baseline and after 6 months.

Results: Median (interquartile range) IOP significantly decreased from 20 to 16 mmHg, independent of sex and age. Most patients (95.8%) reached an IOP < 18 mmHg. TF-BUT improved, with a negative weak correlation to age at baseline and at 6 months. The percentage of patients with no fluorescein staining improved. The quality of life recorded by GSS also improved, being related both to age and corneal staining.

Conclusion: Brinz/Tim FC is effective and well tolerated. In this study, patients switched to Brinz/Tim FC obtained further reduction in IOP with no effects on ocular surface status and improved quality of life perception: a better quality of life could determine a better adherence to prescribed therapy.     

Brinzolamide/timolol fixed combination: a new ocular suspension for the treatment of open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension

For the treatment of open-angle glaucoma, the most frequent cause of irreversible visual loss, fixed combinations of different topical intraocular pressure (IOP) lowering molecules have gained an important role in recent years. The use of fixed combinations reduces the number of daily instillations, which promotes adherence to the prescribed medication and diminishes the exposition of the ocular surface to preservatives. The fixed combination of brinzolamide and timolol was recently approved by the European Medicines Agency (EMEA) and is now available in several countries in Europe. It contains two molecules widely used to treat glaucoma: timolol 0.5% (5 mg/ml) and brinzolamide 1% (10 mg/ml) in ophthalmic suspension formulation. This fixed combination is approved for twice-daily instillation to reduce elevated IOP in open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension. The brinzolamide/timolol fixed combination provides an approximately 30 – 33% IOP reduction from the untreated baseline IOP of 25 – 27 mmHg; thus, it is more potent than either of its ingredients alone. It is similarly effective but better tolerated than the dorzolamide/timolol fixed combination, which consists of molecules from the same pharmacological classes. The brinzolamide/timolol fixed combination can be used by itself as a separate therapy, but owing to the additivity of its ingredients to IOP-lowering drugs belonging to other classes, it may also be administered adjunctive to other IOP-reducing molecules, most importantly topical prostaglandin analogues. The ocular and systemic tolerance of the brinzolamide/ timolol fixed combination was reported favorable in Phase III studies, but no long-term clinical experience with this preparation is available at present.     

Changes in intraocular pressure following a switch from latanoprost monotherapy to latanoprost/timolol fixed combination therapy in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension: results from a clinical practice database

ABSTRACT

Aims: To assess the incremental change in intraocular pressure (IOP) levels in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension, insufficiently treated with topical ocular hypotensive monotherapy or combination therapy and changed to the latanoprost/timolol fixed-combination therapy (LTFC).

Methods: The glaucoma database of the Glasgow Royal Infirmary was reviewed retrospectively to identify patients ≥?18 years of age with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension in at least one eye who had been switched to LTFC from a previous monotherapy or combination therapy. Ninety patients were identified, and 59 (66%) had changed to LTFC from latanoprost monotherapy (LM). The analysis focused on this subgroup because few patients were changed from any other single therapy. At least one documented patient visit following the change to LTFC was required. The within-subject difference in IOP levels (IOP on LM–IOP on LTFC) was calculated for each case, and the statistical significance of the mean change in IOP was analysed using a 2-sided Student's paired t-test with a 0.05 α level.

Results: The mean decrease in IOP after changing to LTFC from LM was 2.6?mmHg (95% confidence interval?=?1.6, 3.6), from 21.4 (SD?=?3.5) mmHg to 18.8 (SD?=?4.2) mmHg (p?=?0.002).

Conclusions: LTFC provides significant incremental IOP reduction in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension who require additional IOP reduction following treatment with LM.     

Intraocular pressure lowering effect of dorzolamide/timolol fixed combination in patients with glaucoma who were unresponsive to prostaglandin analogs/prostamides*

ABSTRACT

Objective: To evaluate the intraocular pressure lowering effect of the dorzolamide/timolol fixed combination (DTFC) in non-responder glaucoma patients to prostaglandin analogs/prostamides (prostas).

Patients and methods: All glaucoma patients treated with DTFC, between June 2003 and December 2005, who were unresponsive to prostaglandin analogs/prostamides, were identified through a retrospective medical records review. A non-responder was defined as an intraocular pressure (IOP) lowering effect less than 15% compared with baseline measurement. Two 12?hour IOP diurnal curves, measured between 8:00?a.m. and 8:00?p.m. (8:00?a.m., 10:00?a.m., 12:00?noon, 2:00?p.m., 4:00?p.m., 6:00?p.m. and 8:00?p.m.), were obtained retrospectively from the records of 31 patients, the first while on prostaglandin analogs/prostamides (baseline IOP) and the second while receiving DTFC (DTFC IOP). The study outcomes were the change in mean diurnal IOP and the reduction in IOP fluctuation as a result of receiving DTFC in patients unresponsive to prostas. The IOP was evaluated by intragroup comparisons with a two-tailed paired Student's t?test. A chi-square test was adopted for analysis of categorical variables.

Results: 31 patients were included in this retrospective study. DTFC significantly reduced IOP in the patients overall, from 25.4 (3.5) to 20.2 (1.0)?mmHg, p < 0.0001. The majority of patients were diagnosed with pseudoexfoliative glaucoma (PEX) (58%; 18/31). DTFC reduced the mean IOP fluctuations over 12 hours (highest minus lowest IOP reading within the 12?hours pressure curve) from 8.6 (3.2) to 4.3 (1.4)?mmHg, p < 0.0001. The most common adverse events were ocular burning (16%) and taste perversion (13%). There were no serious treatment-related adverse events.

Conclusion: DTFC significantly reduced the IOP in patients with glaucoma who did not respond to prostaglandin analogs/prostamides. Further research is needed to confirm these results.     

Three-month,randomized, parallel-group comparison of brimonidine–timolol versus dorzolamide–timolol fixed-combination therapy

ABSTRACT

Objective: Fixed combinations of 0.2% brimonidine–0.5% timolol and 2% dorzolamide–0.5% timolol are used to lower intraocular pressure (IOP). The objective of this study was to evaluate the IOP-lowering efficacy and ocular tolerability of brimonidine–timolol compared with dorzolamide–timolol when used as monotherapy or as adjunctive therapy to a prostaglandin analog (PGA) in patients with glaucoma or ocular hypertension.

Study design and methods: Pooled data analysis of two randomized, investigator-masked, 3-month, parallel-group studies with identical protocols (ten sites). In all, 180 patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension who were in need of lower IOP received topical brimonidine–timolol BID or dorzolamide–timolol BID as monotherapy (n?=?101) or as adjunctive therapy to a PGA (latanoprost, bimatoprost, or travoprost) (n?=?79).

Clinical trial registration: The studies are registered with the identifiers NCT00822081 and NCT00822055 at http://www.clinicaltrials.gov.

Main outcome measures: IOP was measured at 10 a.m. (peak effect) at baseline and at months 1 and 3. Tolerability/comfort was evaluated using a patient questionnaire.

Results: There were no statistically significant between-group differences in patient demographics. Most patients were Caucasian, and the mean age was 68 years. There were also no statistically significant differences between treatment groups in baseline IOP. At month 3, the mean (SD) reduction from baseline IOP for patients on fixed-combination monotherapy was 7.7 (4.2) mmHg (32.3%) with brimonidine–timolol versus 6.7 (5.0) mmHg (26.1%) with dorzolamide–timolol (p?=?0.040). The mean reduction from PGA-treated baseline IOP for patients on fixed-combination adjunctive therapy was 6.9 (4.8) mmHg (29.3%) with brimonidine–timolol versus 5.2 (3.7) mmHg (23.5%) with dorzolamide–timolol (p?=?0.213). Patients on brimonidine–timolol reported less burning (p?<?0.001), stinging (p?<?0.001), and unusual taste (p?<?0.001) than patients on dorzolamide–timolol.

Conclusions: Fixed-combination brimonidine–timolol provided the same or greater IOP lowering compared with fixed-combination dorzolamide–timolol. Both fixed-combination medications were safe and well-tolerated. Brimonidine–timolol received higher ratings of ocular comfort than dorzolamide–timolol. The duration of the studies was 3 months, and additional studies will be needed to compare the efficacy and tolerability of brimonidine–timolol and dorzolamide–timolol during long-term treatment.     

Comparison of ocular hypotensive actions of fixed combinations of brimonidine/timolol and dorzolamide/timolol

Abstract

Objective:

To compare brimonidine/timolol fixed combination (BrTFC; Combigan with dorzolamide/timolol fixed combination (DTFC; Cosopt in terms of ability to lower intraocular pressure (IOP) in primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG).     

Efficacy and ocular surface tolerability of preservative-free tafluprost 0.0015%: a 6-month,single-blind,observational study on naïve ocular hypertension or glaucoma patients

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety of preservative-free tafluprost in newly diagnosed patients and to confirm its efficacy in lowering intraocular pressure (IOP).

Methods: Naïve patients were submitted to an ophthalmic examination, including ocular surface status and quality of life evaluation. All examinations were performed at baseline and after 1 and 6 months.

Results: 28 patients were enrolled and treated with tafluprost, once a day, in the evening. TF-BUT changed from 9 (interquartile range (IQR) 6 – 11) s at baseline to 10 (IQR 7 – 10) s at 1 month (p = 0.106) and 9 (IQR 6 – 12) s at 6 months (p = 0.003). No eye developed corneal staining. Quality of life was (median (IQR)) 91.6 (79.2 – 95.8) at baseline and 95.8 (66.7 – 100) at 6 months (p = 0.62). Only a few adverse events occurred during the follow-up period (three patients experienced ocular burning and one developed redness). The mean IOP reduction was 5.5 mm Hg (95% CI 3.8 – 7.2). The median (IQR) baseline IOP was 18.7 (15 – 23.7) mm Hg; 14 (13 – 16) mm Hg and 16 (14 – 16) mm Hg (p < 0.0001) after 1 and 6 months, respectively.

Conclusion: No patient developed ocular surface disease and quality of life perception was preserved. Preservative-free tafluprost is therefore an effective drug that is safe for the ocular surface after 6 months of daily therapy.     

Intraocular pressure reduction with travoprost/timolol fixed combination,with and without adjunctive brinzolamide,in glaucoma

ABSTRACT

Objective: To investigate if combined intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering medication with travoprost/timolol fixed combination and a carbonic anhydrase inhibitor, brinzolamide, is superior to both travoprost monotherapy and travoprost/timolol fixed-combination therapy in primary open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension.

Methods: Following a 4-week wash-out period and using 4-week long treatment periods, 20 primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension patients were treated with evening travoprost 0.004?%?, then switched to evening travoprost 0.004?%?/timolol 0.5?%?fixed combination, and finally the treatment was combined with adjunctive twice-daily brinzolamide 1?%?ophthalmic suspension. Both eyes were treated, but only one eye per patient (the eye with the higher mean diurnal IOP at baseline), was evaluated. IOP was measured at 8 a.m., 12 noon and 4 p.m. at baseline and at the end of each treatment period.

Results: Mean diurnal IOP (mean (SD)) at baseline was 28.5 (7.3) mmHg which decreased to 22.3 (6.3) mmHg on travoprost, 19.2 (3.4) mmHg on travoprost/timolol fixed combination and 17.3 (3.4) mmHg when the brinzolamide was added to the travoprost/timolol combination (ANOVA, contrast test, p?<?0.003 for all comparisons). The individual time point IOP values showed similar and significant stepwise differences.

Conclusion: Adjunctive brinzolamide medication provided further IOP decrease in patients receiving evening-dosed travoprost/timolol fixed combination. The travoprost/timolol fixed combination was significantly more effective in IOP reduction than travoprost monotherapy, which by itself induced a significant IOP decrease compared to the untreated baseline value. The results of this open label study suggest that combined therapy with travoprost/timolol fixed combination and brinzolamide is clinically useful for IOP-lowering in primary open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension.     

Tafluprost for glaucoma

Introduction: Lowering intraocular pressure (IOP) is, at present, the only therapeutic approach to the treatment of glaucoma. Good compliance is essential in every chronic therapy; therefore, the development of IOP-lowering eye drops that are well tolerated and have an easy administration schedule is essential for the treatment of glaucoma. Prostaglandins are a first-choice drug class for the treatment of glaucoma.

Areas covered: This review provides a background on tafluprost, a newly synthesized prostaglandin analogue, and summarizes the existing data on its efficacy and safety, including comparative data with the other prostaglandin derivatives now available on the market. A review of the literature was performed.

Expert opinion: Current research focuses not only on the efficacy of the drugs but also on their tolerability. The importance of obtaining good compliance by the patient is increasingly relevant; therefore, new formulations are studied to provide fewer side effects and an easier schedule. Tafluprost is a new prostaglandin analogue that has been marketed in some European countries and in Japan for more than 2 years and was recently (July 2009) approved in 21 countries. Besides a well-demonstrated IOP-lowering effect, tafluprost is the first topical prostaglandin available as a preservative-free formulation.     

Fixed combinations of dorzolamide-timolol and brimonidine-timolol in the management of glaucoma

Importance of the field: The emergence of fixed-combination drugs for the treatment of glaucoma has, to some extent, changed the medical management of glaucoma. The potential benefits of these drugs include a reduction in the total number of drops and preservatives instilled per day and improved patient comfort factors, which may contribute to better compliance. Combination medications may also improve therapeutic efficacy and play an important role in controlling medication cost. However, the fixed dosing may be a disadvantage in some cases.

Area covered in this review: This review describes the composition, pharmacokinetics, mode of action, efficacy, side effects, and safety profile of fixed-combination dorzolamide–timolol and fixed-combination brimonidine–timolol.

What the reader will gain: Understanding of the pros, cons, and safety profile of two FDA approved fixed-combination antiglaucoma medication.

Take home message: Fixed-combination medications may be a reasonable adjunct to prostaglandins if a large drop in the intraocular pressure (IOP) is desired and adding only one medication is unlikely to reach the target IOP range. Both mentioned drugs are effective in reducing the IOP and further clinical studies will help identify differences in efficacy between the two. The clinician must make an individualized assessment of the medication's risk-benefit profile for each patient.