Clinical management of patients with insomnia. The role of zopiclone

Insomnia, especially when chronic, is associated with disturbances in daytime well-being and performance, resulting in a poor quality of life for those affected. Zopiclone has been proven as a drug that favourably balances sleep induction and maintenance as well as an improvement in daytime well-being (efficacy) with a low potential for adverse effects (safety) in the symptomatic treatment of insomnia. Management of chronic insomnia with zopiclone needs a multidimensional approach involving the proper diagnosis of possible underlying causes, and combined use of causal treatment, general sleep hygiene measures, basic elements of psychological treatment and adjunctive medication. It is recommended that therapy with the nonbenzodiazepine hypnotic zopiclone should conform to the guidelines for the use of hypnotics, which are valid for all benzodiazepine receptor agonists.     

Evaluation of l-tryptophan for treatment of insomnia: A review

Sleep laboratory and outpatient studies of the hypnotic efficacy of the amino acid L-tryptophan are reviewed, with particular emphasis on evaluation of therapeutic effectiveness in the treatment of insomnia. In younger situational insomniacs, whose sleep problem consists solely of longer than usual sleep latencies, L-tryptophan is effective in reducing sleep onset time on the first night of administration in doses ranging from 1 to 15 g. In more chronic, well-established sleep-onset insomnia or in more severe insomnias characterized by both sleep onset and sleep maintenance problems, repeated administration of low doses of L-tryptophan over time may be required for therapeutic improvement. In these patients, hypnotic effects appear late in the treatment period or, as shown in some studies, even after discontinuation of treatment. The improvement in sleep measures post-treatment has given rise to use of a treatment regimen known as "interval therapy", in which L-tryptophan treatment alternates with an L-tryptophan-free interval until improvement occurs. The absence of side effects and lack of development of tolerance in long-term use are important factors in the decision to embark upon a trial of L-tryptophan treatment. In addition, L-tryptophan administration is not associated with impairment of visuomotor, cognitive, or memory performance, nor does it elevate threshold for arousal from sleep.     

Pharmacotherapy of insomnia

Insomnia is the most common sleep disorder in the industrialized world. A variety of precipitating events have been identified, but when it becomes a persistent problem, maladaptive patterns become established, thereby, perpetuating the sleep disturbance. Individuals with insomnia have impaired next-day functioning, which impacts their quality of life and places them at increased risk of motor vehicle accidents. Insomnia is commonly associated with chronic medical conditions, as well as an increased incidence of mental disorders. Despite considerable scientific advances in both the understanding and treatment, insomnia continues to be inadequately identified and treated, with < 15% of those with severe insomnia receiving appropriate treatment. The mainstay of treatment for insomnia is cognitive-behavioral therapy, along with judicious use of hypnotic agents.     

Overestimations of hypnotic drug effects by insomniacs—a hypothesis

Data on subjective estimates and polygraphic measures of total sleep time and sleep latency were collected from the literature and analyzed for accordance or discrepancy between subjective and objective (EEG-based) mean values in experiments on acute treatment of insomnia by benzodiazepine hypnotics. In baseline placebo conditions there was a tendency to overestimate the disturbance of sleep. After drug administration, sleeping was overestimated. Within both subjective and objective measures, the magnitude of drug effects was correlated with poor initial sleep. If discrepancies between subjective and objective measures per se were analyzed, a number of correlational factors led to the hypothesis that psychological characteristics of a given population play a primary role: populations overestimating their sleep disturbances also tended to overestimate hypnotic drug effects. However, overestimations of drug effects were not correlated with type of drug or objective measures of sleep disturbance before treatment.     

Pharmacotherapy of insomnia

INTRODUCTION: Insomnia is one of the most prevalent sleep disorders in developed countries, being surpassed only by chronic sleep deprivation. Patients with insomnia tend to have an altered quality of life, impaired daytime functioning and an increased risk of work accidents and motor vehicle crashes. Insomnia is commonly associated with chronic medical conditions, metabolic illnesses and mental disorders (such as depression and anxiety), with which there is a dual, reciprocal relationship. AREAS COVERED: This paper focuses on current pharmacotherapy options for the treatment of insomnia, particularly benzodiazepine receptor agonists, which nowadays represent the mainstay of hypnotic therapy. The melatonin receptor antagonist, ramelteon, is reviewed (an alternative for some patients with only sleep-onset difficulty), as are sedating antidepressants, which are commonly used 'off-label' to treat insomnia, despite limited efficacy data and potential significant safety concerns. Orexin (OX) antagonists are also discussed, especially those that block OX2 or both OX1 and OX2 receptors, as these are the most promising new agents for the treatment of insomnia, with encouraging results in preliminary clinical trials. EXPERT OPINION: Research to evaluate and formulate treatments for insomnia is often complicated by the fact that insomnia is usually of multifactorial etiology. Understanding the molecular and receptor mechanisms involved in promoting sleep in varied disorders could provide future approaches in new drug development. In the long term, more randomized controlled trials are needed to assess both short-term and long-term effects of these medications and their efficacy in comorbid diseases that affect sleep quality or quantity.     

Eszopiclone for the treatment of insomnia

Eszopiclone, a single-isomer, non-benzodiazepine hypnotic agent, is approved for use in the US for the treatment of insomnia for patients who have difficulty falling asleep (sleep latency) as well as for those who have difficulty staying asleep (sleep maintenance). Efficacy in sleep maintenance has not been consistently demonstrated with previous hypnotics, and long-term efficacy and safety data are lacking for these agents. In clinical trials, eszopiclone 3 mg significantly improved objective and subjective sleep measures in transient and chronic insomnia in adults. Nightly treatment with eszopiclone 1 mg effectively induced sleep in elderly patients and the 2-mg dose effectively induced and maintained sleep. The ability of eszopiclone 2 mg to significantly improve next-day functioning and daytime alertness (as demonstrated by a reduction in the number and duration of naps) in the elderly is an important finding in clinical trials, and is unique to the class of hypnotic agents for the treatment of insomnia. Eszopiclone was well tolerated in clinical trials < or = 12 months duration, with no clinically significant evidence of pharmacological tolerance, rebound insomnia or dependence. The most frequently reported adverse event was unpleasant taste. Eszopiclone is the only non-benzodiazepine sedative-hypnotic (in the Schedule IV class under the Controlled Substances Act) to be evaluated as a long-term treatment for chronic insomnia.     

Zaleplon improves sleep without producing rebound effects in outpatients with insomnia. Zaleplon Clinical Study Group

The efficacy and safety of three doses of zaleplon, a novel non-benzodiazepine hypnotic, were compared with those of placebo in outpatients with insomnia in this 4-week study, using zolpidem 10 mg as active comparator. Postsleep questionnaires were used to determine treatment effects on the patient's perception of sleep, as well as any development of pharmacological tolerance during therapy or rebound insomnia or withdrawal symptoms upon discontinuation of therapy. During week 1, sleep latency was significantly shorter with zaleplon 5, 10, and 20 mg compared to placebo. The significant decrease in sleep latency persisted through week 4 with zaleplon 20 mg, and was again evident with zaleplon 10 mg at week 3. Zaleplon 20 mg also had significant effects on sleep duration, number of awakenings, and sleep quality compared to placebo. No pharmacological tolerance developed during treatment with zaleplon and there were no indications of rebound insomnia or withdrawal symptoms after treatment discontinuation. Zolpidem 10 mg had significant effects on sleep latency, sleep duration, and sleep quality compared to placebo. However, a significantly greater incidence of withdrawal symptoms and a suggestion of sleep difficulty after treatment discontinuation (rebound insomnia) for all sleep measures was seen with zolpidem compared to placebo. There was no significant difference in the frequency of adverse events with active treatment compared to placebo. These results show that zaleplon provides effective treatment of insomnia with a favourable safety profile.     

Spotlight on eszopiclone in insomnia

Eszopiclone (Lunesta), the S-enantiomer of racemic zopiclone, is a nonbenzodiazepine hypnotic agent that is approved in the US as an oral, once-nightly therapy for insomnia in adults; eszopiclone is also currently under review by the European Medicines Agency.Eszopiclone is rapidly absorbed after oral administration without any next-day clinical residual effects being detected. Large, well designed trials of up to 6 months' duration have shown that eszopiclone significantly improves both sleep onset and sleep maintenance compared with placebo in adult and elderly patients with primary insomnia. Eszopiclone for 4-8 weeks also significantly improved sleep parameters compared with placebo in patients with insomnia coexisting with other conditions that also disturb sleep (co-morbid insomnia), and improved certain measures of the co-morbid conditions to a greater extent than the standard therapies alone. Short-term eszopiclone produced improvements in daytime functioning in patients with co-morbid insomnia. Six months' therapy in adults with primary insomnia improved daytime functioning and health-related quality of life. Eszopiclone was generally well tolerated. There was no evidence of tolerance during 12 months of treatment with this agent. On discontinuation of eszopiclone, there was no rebound insomnia or serious withdrawal effects. Well designed, comparative trials with other nonbenzodiazepine hypnotics are needed to determine its relative efficacy and tolerability. A cost-utility analysis suggested that eszopiclone is cost effective for the treatment of primary insomnia in the US. Therefore, eszopiclone is a useful therapeutic option in the management of adult and elderly patients with primary or co-morbid insomnia. Unlike most other hypnotics, eszopiclone is not limited to short-term use.     

Eszopiclone: a review of its use in the treatment of insomnia

Eszopiclone (Lunesta), the S-enantiomer of racemic zopiclone, is a nonbenzodiazepine hypnotic agent that is approved in the US as an oral, once-nightly therapy for insomnia in adults; eszopiclone is also currently under review by the European Medicines Agency.Eszopiclone is rapidly absorbed after oral administration without any next-day clinical residual effects being detected. Large, well designed trials of up to 6 months' duration have shown that eszopiclone significantly improves both sleep onset and sleep maintenance compared with placebo in adult and elderly patients with primary insomnia. Eszopiclone for 4-8 weeks also significantly improved sleep parameters compared with placebo in patients with insomnia coexisting with other conditions that also disturb sleep (co-morbid insomnia), and improved certain measures of the co-morbid conditions to a greater extent than the standard therapies alone. Short-term eszopiclone produced improvements in daytime functioning in patients with co-morbid insomnia. Six months' therapy in adults with primary insomnia improved daytime functioning and health-related quality of life. Eszopiclone was generally well tolerated. There was no evidence of tolerance during 12 months' treatment with this agent. On discontinuation of eszopiclone, there was no rebound insomnia or serious withdrawal effects. Well designed, comparative trials with other nonbenzodiazepine hypnotics are needed to determine its relative efficacy and tolerability. A cost-utility analysis suggested that eszopiclone is cost effective for the treatment of primary insomnia in the US. Therefore, eszopiclone is a useful therapeutic option in the management of adult and elderly patients with primary or co-morbid insomnia. Unlike most other hypnotics, eszopiclone is not limited to short-term use.     

Drug evaluation: tesamorelin, a synthetic human growth hormone releasing factor

Theratechnologies, under license from Valeant, is developing tesamorelin as a potential vaccine adjuvant and for the potential treatment of wasting, hip fracture recovery, immune disorders, HIV-related lipodystrophy, sleep maintenance insomnia and mild cognitive impairment. Phase III clinical trials for the treatment of HIV-associated lipodystrophy and phase II clinical trials for sleep disorder, chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder, hip fracture and immune system dysfunction are underway. Phase II trials are also assessing the influenza vaccination immune response and cognitive effects of tesamorelin.     

Hypnotic efficacy of estazolam compared with flurazepam in outpatients with insomnia

Estazolam is a new benzodiazepine hypnotic agent with an intermediate half-life of 12 to 15 hours. The authors designed an investigation to compare its hypnotic efficacy to that of flurazepam, generally considered the reference standard. The hypnotic efficacy of estazolam at two doses (1 mg and 2 mg) was compared with that of flurazepam (30 mg) in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, 7-night study that involved 223 outpatients with insomnia. On subjective assessments of the patients, no differences were noted between estazolam 2 mg and flurazepam 30 mg on any of six sleep parameters. Patients who were receiving estazolam 1 mg rated their sleep significantly better than did patients who were receiving placebo on all parameters except sleep latency. Global evaluation of the physicians indicated significant improvement in quality of sleep, sleep depth, sleep duration, and nocturnal awakenings in all three active treatment groups; estazolam 2 mg and flurazepam also decreased sleep latency significantly. The percentage of patients who reported any adverse experience was 68% for flurazepam, 58% for estazolam 2 mg, and 54% for estazolam 1 mg; the incidence of adverse events in the placebo group was 43%. In conclusion, estazolam 2 mg was found to be as effective a hypnotic as flurazepam 30 mg. Estazolam 1 mg is also effective in the treatment of outpatients with insomnia, but to a lesser degree.     

Triazolam: a review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic efficacy in patients with insomnia

Triazolam is a triazolobenzodiazepine with hypnotic properties, advocated for use in acute or chronic insomnia, situational insomnia in hospitalised patients, and insomnia associated with other disease states. As triazolam has a relatively short half-life of about 2 to 3 hours in healthy subjects and has only 1 short acting active metabolite, alpha-hydroxytriazolam, it would seem more suitable as an hypnotic than longer acting drugs such as flurazepam, nitrazepam or flunitrazepam, particularly when residual sedative effects on the day after ingestion are undesirable. Thus, with usual hypnotic doses of triazolam (0.25 or 0.5 mg) impairment of psychomotor and cognitive function is generally not carried over into the day after ingestion, although at doses of 1 mg or greater, residual effects may appear. In short term comparative studies triazolam was clearly superior to a placebo, and was at lest as effective as flurazepam, or other benzodiazepines such as nitrazepam or diazepam, in hastening sleep onset, reducing nocturnal awakenings, and increasing sleep duration. In other studies it was often superior to chloral hydrate, methyprylone or quinalbarbitone (secobarbital). In a small number of patients with chronic insomnia receiving extended treatment with triazolam in a clinical setting or in some sleep laboratory studies, no evidence of tolerance occurred; however, some evidence of reduced effect with repeated administration has been reported in one sleep laboratory study. Thus, a definitive statement about the likelihood of tolerance occurring on repeated administration is difficult to make at this time.     

Loprazolam. A preliminary review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic efficacy in insomnia

Loprazolam is a 1,4-benzodiazepine with hypnotic properties, advocated for use in acute or chronic insomnia. As loprazolam has a half-life of 7 to 8 hours in healthy adults it may have advantages over longer-acting hypnotics, particularly when residual sedative effects on the day after ingestion are undesirable, although at doses greater than 1 mg residual sedation may occur. In addition, it may reduce daytime anxiety, following a hypnotic dose the night before, more effectively than the short-acting drug, triazolam. In short term comparative studies loprazolam was clearly superior to placebo, and was at least as effective as triazolam, flurazepam, nitrazepam, flunitrazepam or temazepam in hastening sleep onset, reducing nocturnal awakenings and increasing total sleep duration and quality. In the small number of patients with chronic insomnia who have received extended treatment with loprazolam, no evidence of tolerance has occurred, although rebound insomnia was evident 3 days after drug withdrawal in several studies. Thus, with its 'intermediate' elimination half-life, loprazolam would appear to have some potential advantages over both long- and short-acting hypnotics in selected patients, although further studies are needed to fully elucidate its place in therapy.     

Pharmacotherapy of insomnia

Introduction: Insomnia is one of the most prevalent sleep disorders in developed countries, being surpassed only by chronic sleep deprivation. Patients with insomnia tend to have an altered quality of life, impaired daytime functioning and an increased risk of work accidents and motor vehicle crashes. Insomnia is commonly associated with chronic medical conditions, metabolic illnesses and mental disorders (such as depression and anxiety), with which there is a dual, reciprocal relationship.

Areas covered: This paper focuses on current pharmacotherapy options for the treatment of insomnia, particularly benzodiazepine receptor agonists, which nowadays represent the mainstay of hypnotic therapy. The melatonin receptor antagonist, ramelteon, is reviewed (an alternative for some patients with only sleep-onset difficulty), as are sedating antidepressants, which are commonly used ‘off-label’ to treat insomnia, despite limited efficacy data and potential significant safety concerns. Orexin (OX) antagonists are also discussed, especially those that block OX2 or both OX1 and OX2 receptors, as these are the most promising new agents for the treatment of insomnia, with encouraging results in preliminary clinical trials.

Expert opinion: Research to evaluate and formulate treatments for insomnia is often complicated by the fact that insomnia is usually of multifactorial etiology. Understanding the molecular and receptor mechanisms involved in promoting sleep in varied disorders could provide future approaches in new drug development. In the long term, more randomized controlled trials are needed to assess both short-term and long-term effects of these medications and their efficacy in comorbid diseases that affect sleep quality or quantity.     

A comparative 25-night sleep laboratory study on the effects of quazepam and triazolam on chronic insomniacs

The short- and intermediate-term actions, as well as the carryover and withdrawal effects, of quazepam , a new benzodiazepine hypnotic with a half-life of 60 to 100 hours, were compared with those of triazolam, a triazolodiazepine hypnotic with a half-line of 2 to 3 hours. Both the subjective effects of these drugs as well as their objective actions on the sleep EEG were sought. The study was conducted on two groups of six subjects with chronic insomnia who ranged in age from 32 to 56 years. Each subject was studied for 25 consecutive nights. Placebo was administered at bedtime on the first four nights, followed by 30 mg quazepam or 0.5 mg triazolam on the next 14 nights and by placebo again on the ensuing seven withdrawal nights. Both drugs increased the total sleep time during their administration and improved the subjective quality of sleep. Major differences, however, were observed on withdrawal. A significant and marked decrease in the total sleep time occurred with triazolam on the first withdrawal night. With quazepam , rebound insomnia was not observed at any time during the seven-day withdrawal period.     

Comparative efficacy of zolpidem and temazepam in transient insomnia

This study compared hypnotic effects of zolpidem 10 mg, temazepam 15 mg and placebo in healthy adults. Two factors expected to promote insomnia, the 'first night effect' and a 2-hour phase advance, were combined in a single night laboratory-based double-blinded protocol. This was a multi-center study, with data collected in 13 sleep laboratories. Subjects with normal sleep histories and without prior sleep laboratory experience were randomly assigned to treatment groups. Medications were administered 15 min before lights out, with polysomnographic monitoring for 7.5 h. Subjective questionnaires and performance tests, digit symbol substitution test (DSST) and symbol copying test (SCT), were administered at study entry and after arising. 630 subjects completed the study and provided data analyzed using repeated measures ANOVAs. Neither agent significantly reduced objective sleep latency relative to placebo. Zolpidem reduced awakenings and wake after sleep onset (WASO); temazepam did not. Both agents improved sleep efficiency and most subjective sleep measures relative to placebo, with zolpidem superior for five of six subjective outcome measures compared to temazepam. SCT, morning sleepiness and morning concentration were not altered by any treatment. Zolpidem significantly reduced morning DSST performance; temazepam did not. Zolpidem 10 mg provided greater subjective hypnotic efficacy than temazepam 15 mg in this model of transient insomnia, with reduced polysomnographic awakenings and WASO. Impairment of DSST was seen with zolpidem but not temazepam. Copyright 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Drugs for insomnia

Introduction: Sleep is a vital neurochemical process involving sleep-promoting and arousal centers in the brain. Insomnia is a pervasive disorder characterized by difficulties in initiating or maintaining or non-refreshing (poor quality) sleep and clinically significant daytime distress. Insomnia is more prevalent in women and old age and puts sufferers at significant physical and mental health risks. This review summarizes published data on the current and emerging insomnia drug classes, rationale for development and associated risks/benefits. (Summary of Product Characteristics and Medline search on "hypnotic" or specific drug names and "Insomnia"). Areas covered: GABA(A) receptor modulators facilitate sleep onset and some improve maintenance but increase risk of dependence, memory, cognitive and psychomotor impairments, falls, accidents and mortality. Melatonin receptor agonists improve quality of sleep and/or sleep onset but response may develop over several days. They have more benign safety profiles and are indicated for milder insomnia, longer usage and (prolonged release melatonin) older patients. Histamine H-1 receptor antagonists improve sleep maintenance but their effects on cognition, memory and falls remain to be demonstrated. Late-stage pipeline orexin OX1/OX2 and serotonin 5HT2A receptor antagonists may hold the potential to address several unmet needs in insomnia pharmacotherapy but safety issues cast some doubts over their future. Expert opinion: Current and new insomnia drugs in the pipeline target different sleep regulating mechanisms and symptoms and have different tolerability profiles. Drug selection would ideally be based on improvement in the quality of patients' sleep, overall quality of life and functional status weighed against risk to the individual and public health.     

Ramelteon: a review of its use in insomnia

Ramelteon (Rozeremtrade mark) is the first melatonin receptor agonist to be approved for the treatment of insomnia; it is not classified as a controlled substance. In patients with chronic insomnia, objectively assessed latency to persistent sleep (LPS) at week 1 was improved with oral ramelteon 8 mg administered 30 minutes before bedtime, compared with placebo, and this effect was maintained throughout the duration of 5-week and 6-month clinical studies. Subjectively assessed sleep latency (sSL) improved in some, but not all, studies. When a statistically significant improvement in sSL occurred at week 1, the effect was maintained throughout the duration of the 5-week studies, but not at all timepoints throughout a 6-month study. Improvements in objectively assessed total sleep time (TST) and sleep efficiency (SE) were only reported during the first week of treatment. Improvements in other objective or subjective measures of sleep were not consistent. Ramelteon was generally well tolerated, did not impair next-day cognitive or motor performance and was not associated with withdrawal symptoms, rebound insomnia or abuse potential. Thus, ramelteon provides a well tolerated option for the treatment of patients with insomnia characterized by difficulty in sleep onset.     

Adult domiciliary oxygen therapy: position statement of the Thoracic Society of Australia and New Zealand

Evidence shows that patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and a stable daytime PaO2 of 55 mm Hg or less will have longer life expectancy if given supplemental oxygen to keep the PaO2 above 60 mm Hg, preferably for longer than 15 hours a day, including sleep. There is some evidence for improved quality of life. It is reasonable to offer this therapy for other lung diseases which cause chronic hypoxaemia, and there are also less well defined indications for supplemental oxygen during exercise, sleep and air travel.