小剂量硼替佐米联合化疗治疗4例多发性骨髓瘤的疗效

目的观察小剂量硼替佐米联合化疗治疗复发难治或初发多发性骨髓瘤（MM）的疗效和不良反应。方法4例MM患者接受硼替佐米＋环磷酰胺＋地塞米松＋沙利度胺治疗,每3周为一疗程。所有患者接受2～4疗程的治疗。采用EBMT疗效标准评价疗效,按国立癌症研究所的常规毒性判定标准评价不良反应。结果4例MM患者中1例接近完全缓解,3例部分缓解。不良反应有白细胞减少、血小板减少、肺部感染等。结论小剂量硼替佐米联合化疗可作为复发难治或初发MM的治疗选择。     

硼替佐米联合沙利度胺治疗复发、难治性多发性骨髓瘤的疗效与安全性观察

目的:观察硼替佐米联合沙利度胺治疗复发、难治性多发性骨髓瘤的疗效与安全性.方法:收集我院2007年3月至2010年12月采用硼替佐米联合沙利度胺方案治疗复发、难治性多发性骨髓瘤患者的临床资料进行回顾性分析.治疗方法为硼替佐米1.3 mg/m2,于第1、4、8、11天静脉注射;沙利度胺100 mg/d,口服;21 d为1个疗程.依据欧洲血液及骨髓移植组标准判定疗效,按CTCAE Version 3.0标准评价不良反应.结果:共有66例复发、难治性多发性骨髓瘤患者接受硼替佐米联合沙利度胺治疗,除外因个人原因未完成治疗的7例患者,共有59例患者的资料纳入分析.59例中男37例,女22例,中位年龄51(30 ～64)岁.中位疗程数为6(2～8),中位观察期5(2～10)个月,59例患者中有6例获得完全缓解,12例获得部分缓解,20例获得轻微缓解,总有效率为64.4％.最常见不良反应为胃肠道症状(42例,其中出现不同程度恶心或呕吐36例次,腹泻29例次),其他不良反应为乏力(37例)、血小板减少(23例)、肢端麻木(18例)、发热(15例)、憋气、心慌(5例)、体位性低血压(4例),有1例患者出现视觉障碍.经减少用药剂量或停药及对症治疗后均获缓解.结论:硼替佐米联合沙利度胺是治疗复发、难治性多发性骨髓瘤的有效方法,同时具有较好的安全性.     

硼替佐米联合化疗治疗多发性骨髓瘤的临床分析

目的观察硼替佐米联合化疗治疗多发性骨髓瘤的疗效及不良反应。方法2例初治、4例难治复发MM患者接受硼替佐米＋VAD方案化疗＋沙利度胺治疗。结果2例完全缓解,3例部分缓解,1例疾病进展。主要不良反应包括白细胞减少、血小板减少、周围神经症状等。结论硼替佐米联合化疗治疗初治及难治复发多发性骨髓瘤是安全、可靠、有效的方法。     

减低与标准剂量硼替佐米联合地塞米松治疗多发性骨髓瘤的疗效对比分析

目的：观察标准剂量或减低剂量硼替佐米联合地塞米松治疗多发性骨髓瘤（MM）的疗效及安全性。方法40例初诊或复发、难治MM患者,其中22例使用标准剂量硼替佐米（1．3 mg·m－2）第1、4、8、11天快速静脉注射,第1～2、4～5、8～9、11～12天使用地塞米松20 mg静脉滴注。18例使用1．75 mg硼替佐米（平均0．8～1．0 mg·m－2）第1、4、8、11天快速静脉注射,第1～2、4～5、8～9、11～12天使用地塞米松20mg静脉滴注。两组均为每4周重复给药。所有患者均化疗1～6个疗程。结果比较两组完成4个疗程的MM患者疗效与不良反应,标准剂量组与减低剂量组有效率（完全缓解率＋部分缓解率）分别为81．2％与86．7％（P＞0．05）。两组的不良反应主要为血液系统毒性、周围神经病变及胃肠道不良反应。其中标准剂量组与减低剂量组比较,中性粒细胞、血小板减少发生率两组差异均无统计学意义（40．9％ vs 33．3％,P＝0．747;54．3％ vs 50．0％,P＝1．000）、Ⅲ～Ⅳ级周围神经病（36．4％vs 5．6％,P＝0．027）、胃肠道不良反应发生率（50．0％vs 16．7％,P＝0．046）前者均高于后者,差异有统计学意义。结论减低剂量硼替佐米治疗初治、复发难治性MM疗效反应与标准剂量组相似,但不良反应较标准剂量组减低。     

硼替佐米联合VAD方案治疗初治多发性骨髓瘤的临床观察

目的:观察硼替佐米联合VAD方案治疗初治多发性骨髓瘤(MM)的初期疗效和安全性。方法:15例初治MM患者给予硼替佐米1.3mg.m-2,第1、4、8、11天静脉注射,每28天为1个疗程;每个疗程联合VAD方案化疗,每例患者至少接受2～8个疗程治疗。采用欧洲骨髓移植协作组(EBMT)标准评价其初步疗效,按美国国家癌症研究所不良事件常用名标准(NCI-CTCAE,version3.0)判断其毒副反应。结果:15例MM患者经过不同疗程的治疗,3例完全缓解,5例接近完全缓解,5例部分缓解,2例轻微缓解,总有效率达86.7%。最常见的毒副反应为胃肠道反应,有11例出现不同程度的胃肠道反应,其次为周围神经病变4例、乏力4例、肝功能损伤1例、带状疱疹1例,毒副反应分别经对症治疗后均获得一定程度的缓解。结论:硼替佐米联合VAD方案治疗初治MM疗效确切,患者可耐受。     

硼替佐米联合地塞米松治疗多发性骨髓瘤的效果研究

目的:观察硼替佐米联合地塞米松治疗多发性骨髓瘤的疗效和不良反应。方法:16例多发性骨髓瘤(MM)患者采用硼替佐米联合地塞米松(PD)方案化疗,按照欧洲骨髓移植协作组(EMBT)标准判断疗效,并按照美国国立癌症研究院的常规毒性判定标准(NCICTCAE)3.0版判定不良反应。结果:16例多发性骨髓瘤患者,其中4例完全缓解(CR),6例部分缓解(PR),2例轻微反应(MR)。总有效率为75.0%。患者均发生一定程度的不良反应,但对症处理后基本缓解。结论:硼替佐米联合地塞米松治疗多发性骨髓瘤疗效理想,不良反应轻微,患者可耐受。     

PAD方案治疗多发性骨髓瘤的临床分析

目的观察硼替佐米、地塞米松、阿霉素(PAD)方案治疗难治复发性多发性骨髓瘤的临床效果及不良反应。方法 9例难治复发的多发骨髓瘤(MM)患者,均采用PAD方案治疗,其中,硼替佐米2 mg/d,d1,4,8,11,快速静脉注射;阿霉素10 mg/d,d1⁴,静脉滴注;地塞米松40 mg/d,d14,静脉滴注;地塞米松40 mg/d,d1⁴,d94,d9¹2,d1712,d17²0,静脉滴注,连续治疗2个周期。观察疗效,并按WHO不良反应分级标准判断不良反应。结果 9例患者,3例患者完全缓解(CR),CR率为33.3%,4例达部分缓解(PR),PR率为44.4%,1例进步,1例无效,CR加PR率77.8%,总有效率为88.9%。不良反应主要有乏力、便秘、皮疹、胃肠道反应及末梢神经炎,均可耐受。结论硼替佐米、阿霉素、地塞米松(PAD)方案治疗难治复发多发性骨髓瘤近期疗效显著,不良反应能耐受,是一种新的治疗选择。     

硼替佐米联合化疗治疗多发性骨髓瘤9例的临床分析

目的观察硼替佐米联合化疗治疗多发性骨髓瘤患者的临床疗效与不良反应。方法4例初治的多发性骨髓瘤（MM）患者接受硼替佐米联合长春新碱、表柔比星、地塞米松（V＋VAD）治疗。5例复发难治骨髓瘤患者接受硼替佐米联合马法兰、泼尼松、沙利度胺（V＋MPT）、硼替佐米联合地塞米松（V＋D）方案治疗,每例患者至少接受2～6个疗程的治疗。按照美国国立癌症研究所（NCI）（第3版）判断不良反应。随访6个月观察疗效。结果4例初治患者中2例完全缓解（CR）,1例接近完全缓解（nCR）,1例部分缓解（PR）。5例复发难治患者中,2例nCR,2例MR,1例无改变（NC）。主要不良反应包括胃肠道症状、不同程度的血小板减少、周围神经症状和乏力等。经对症治疗及调整用药剂量后均能改善。结论硼替佐米联合其他药物治疗初治、复发难治多发性骨髓瘤患者是一种安全、可靠、有较好治疗前景的方法。     

硼替佐米治疗后复发的多发性骨髓瘤患者的再治疗探讨

目的:探讨小剂量沙利度胺联合MVAD方案治疗硼替佐米治疗后复发的多发性骨髓瘤(MM)患者的疗效及毒副反应。方法:12例曾接受过硼替佐米为基础的治疗(包括PD、PT)的多发性骨髓瘤患者,复发时间在初治后的1~2年。将12例硼替佐米治疗后复发的多发性骨髓瘤患者,采用小剂量沙利度胺联合MVAD方案。按照EBMT标准评价疗效、WHO标准判断毒副反应。结果:治疗4个疗程后,治疗组总有效率66.6%(8/12);治疗组出现的不良反应有便秘、嗜睡、水肿、头晕、乏力。结论:小剂量沙利度胺联合MVAD方案治疗硼替佐米治疗后复发的多发性骨髓瘤疗效明显。     

以硼替佐米为主的化疗方案治疗复发难治性多发性骨髓瘤临床效果观察

目的 观察硼替佐米为主的化疗方案治疗复发难治性多发性骨髓瘤的近期疗效与安全性.方法 对2009年1月至2012年12月采用硼替佐米联合化疗方案治疗45例复发难治性多发性骨髓瘤患者的临床资料进行回顾性分析.患者中男25例,女20例,年龄37～ 78岁,平均（57±2）岁.其中15例接受PAD（硼替佐米、阿霉素、地塞米松）方案,15例接受PCD（硼替佐米、环磷酰胺、地塞米松）方案,8例接受PD（硼替佐米、地塞米松）方案,7例接受PDT（硼替佐米、地塞米松、沙利度胺）方案.按照欧洲骨髓移植协作组标准评价疗效（EBMT）,世界卫生组织（WHO）标准判断不良反应.结果 随访25（5 ～35）个月,采用PAD方案治疗的15例患者有效率93.3％,其中完全缓解＋接近完全缓解7例、非常好的部分缓解3例、部分缓解2例、轻微反应2例、疾病稳定1例.采用PCD方案治疗15例患者有效率93.3％（14/15）,其中完全缓解＋接近完全缓解7例、非常好的部分缓解3例、部分缓解3例、轻微反应1例、疾病稳定1例.采用PAD与PCD方案有效率差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）.采用PD方案治疗8例患者有效率75.0％（6/8）,其中完全缓解＋接近完全缓解3例、非常好的部分缓解1例、部分缓解1例、轻微反应1例、疾病稳定1例、疾病进展1例.采用PDT方案治疗7例患者有效率85.7％ （6/7）,其中完全缓解＋接近完全缓解2例、非常好的部分缓解1例、部分缓解1例、轻微反应1例、疾病稳定1例、疾病进展1例.采用PD与PTD方案2组临床疗效差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）.22例患者出现外周神经病变,主要表现为肢端麻木、感觉减退,其中15例为Ⅰ～Ⅱ级.6例因同时使用硼替佐米、沙利度胺出现肢端麻木,停用沙利度胺后临床症状逐渐缓解,1例为Ⅲ级.主要不良反应为周围神经病变、胃肠道症状、带状疱疹及感染、血液系统不良反应、乏力、脱发.但通     

Efficacy of prednisone in refractory multiple myeloma and measurement of glucocorticoid receptors

Summary Background: Prednisone is an active drug in the treatment of multiple myeloma. The optimal dose, frequency, and role of glucocorticoid receptors (GR) in response to prednisone is unknown.Purpose: The purposes of this study were (1) to estimate the response rate of alternate-day high dose prednisone in patients with relapsing and refractory multiple myeloma; (2) to measure the range of GR levels; and (3) to correlate the response of prednisone with GR status.Patients and methods: Between 8/86 and 1/90, 127 patients were entered onto the study with 121 evaluable for response. The number of GR sites/cell was determined on mononuclear cells isolated from pretreatment bone marrow aspirates using a one point GR binding assay. Patients received prednisone 100 mg po qod x 2 weeks, followed by 50 mg po qod x 10 weeks.Results: The overall response rate was 10% (95% CI: 5–15%) with a median survival of 11.8 months. The GR sites/cell ranged from 0–53,212 with a mean of 8,371 sites/cells. Stratification of GR sites into 0–2,500, 2,501–6,000 and > 6,000 sites/cells was associated with a response rate of 6%, 27% and 4% respectively (p = 0.009). The median survival of patients in these categories was 8.1, 14.9 and 10.6 months respectively. This was not significant by the logrank test (p = 0.11). Although myeloma patients with intermediate levels of GR sites/cell initially responded more favorably to prednisone, their long-term survival was not significantly improved.Conclusions: Alternate-day high-dose prednisone was well tolerated and may provide palliative benefit for a subset of patients with relapsing and refractory multiple myeloma. The survival of patients on this study was comparable to that reported with other but more toxic doses of glucocorticoids.     

硼替佐米治疗多发性骨髓瘤疗效及影响因素分析

目的观察硼替佐米治疗多发性骨髓瘤(Multiple myeloma,MM)的疗效及影响因素。方法初治MM患者18例,复发、难治MM患者13例,均接受硼替佐米联合地塞米松(VD)方案治疗,21 d为1个疗程。结果平均随访14(6～36)个月,总反应率77.6%,完全缓解率(CR)6.45%、非常好的部分缓解率(VGPR)22.6%、部分缓解率(PR)48.4%。初治组疗效优于复发难治组;轻链型患者总反应率和CR率均明显高于非轻链型患者。发病或治疗过程中出现严重贫血、血β2微球蛋白(β2-MG)增高、高钙血症和肾功损害者,多数出现疾病进展,是死亡的主要原因。不良反应主要为胃肠道症状、周围神经病变、血小板减少、感染等,经对症治疗或推迟化疗后均可恢复。结论硼替佐米对初发及难治复发多发性骨髓瘤的疗效较好,对治疗相关不良反应患者可耐受,在轻链型患者疗效更加显著。有严重贫血、β2-MG升高、肾功能损害、高钙血症的患者治疗效果不理想,其远期疗效有待进一步观察评价。     

沙利度胺、环磷酰胺联合地塞米松治疗复发/难治性多发性骨髓瘤

目的探讨沙利度胺、环磷酰胺和地塞米松联合治疗复发性、难治性多发性骨髓瘤的疗效。方法将我院18例复发性、难治性多发骨髓瘤患者,应用沙利度胺、环磷酰胺和地塞米松联合治疗后进行疗效分析评价。结果 18例复发性、难治性多发性骨髓瘤经沙利度胺、环磷酰胺和地塞米松联合治疗后临床转归,部分缓解(PR)11例占61.1%、进步(PD)3例占16.7%、无效(NC)4例占22.2%。结论沙利度胺、环磷酰胺和地塞米松联合治疗复发性、难治性多发性骨髓瘤疗效可靠。     

GEMOX方案治疗32 例复发难治性非霍奇金淋巴瘤疗效分析

目的：观察吉西他滨联合奥沙利铂方案（GEMOX 方案）治疗复发难治性非霍奇金淋巴瘤（NHL）的临床疗效和毒副反应。方法回顾性分析32例接受过GEMOX方案治疗的复发难治性NHL患者,每两周评价疗效,每周观察毒副反应。结果32例复发难治性NHL患者中,完全缓解（CR）9例,部分缓解（PR）13例,维持稳定（SD）6例,进展（PD）4例;客观有效率为（CR＋PR）68.8％,临床获益率（CR＋PR＋SD）87.5％;中位无疾病进展时间（PFS）为8.5个月（1.5~12.5个月）;主要不良反应为骨髓抑制,无治疗相关性死亡。结论 GEMOX方案对复发或难治性NHL疗效确切,毒副反应耐受良好,是复发难治性NHL可选的挽救性化疗方案。     

Infliximab in the treatment of medically refractory indeterminate colitis

AIM: To examine the outcome of infliximab intervention in refractory indeterminate colitis. METHODS: Twenty patients with severe, medically refractory indeterminate colitis were treated with infliximab. All patients initially received infliximab, 5 mg/kg, intravenously and, in some patients, the dose was subsequently increased to 10 mg/kg. The number of infusions ranged from one to 16 per patient. Indeterminate colitis was defined as colitis that could not be classified with certainty as Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis based on traditional clinical, endoscopic and histopathological criteria. The clinical response to infliximab was classified as complete response, partial response or non-response. RESULTS: Fourteen of the 20 patients (70%) showed a complete response to infliximab treatment, two showed a partial response and four showed no response. The four non-responders underwent colectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. The resected colon specimen was consistent with ulcerative colitis in all four cases, although two were subsequently re-classified as Crohn's disease. Eight additional patients were subsequently re-classified as having Crohn's disease on longer follow-up evaluation, whilst eight continued to have features of indeterminate colitis. The response rate to infliximab treatment was similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Infliximab is effective in approximately two-thirds of patients with indeterminate colitis, and thus may be considered for patients with refractory disease prior to colectomy. The follow-up time afforded by infliximab treatment may allow for more accurate classification of the disease in a significant proportion of patients whose colitis has indeterminate features at initial presentation.     

Management of refractory fistulizing pouchitis with infliximab

This study provides the long-term follow-up data on the efficacy of infliximab in the treatment of chronic refractory pouchitis complicated by fistulae following ileo-pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) for ulcerative colitis (UC). METHODS: Seven patients (4 F, 3 M) with chronic refractory pouchitis complicated by fistulae were included in an open study. Pouchitis was diagnosed by clinical plus endoscopical and histological criteria. Fistulae were: pouch-bladder in 1, vaginal in 3, perianal in 2, both vaginal and perianal in 1 patient. Extraintestinal manifestations were present in 4 patients. All the patients were refractory to antibiotics (3 patients also to steroids). Crohn's disease was carefully excluded in all patients after re-evaluation of the history, re-examination of the original proctocolectomy specimen, examination of the proximal small bowel. Patients received Infliximab 5 mg/kg at 0, 2 and 6 weeks. Azathioprine (2.5 mg/kg) was also started for all patients as bridge therapy. Clinical response was classified as complete, partial, and no response. Fistulae closure was classified as complete, partial, and no closure. The pouchitis disease activity index (PDAI) and quality of life (QoL) were also used as outcome measures. RESULTS: Clinically, all patients improved. At 10-week follow-up, 6 out of 7 patients had a complete clinical response, and 5 out of 7 patients had complete fistulae closure. At 10- week follow-up, median PDAI dropped from 12 (baseline) (range, 10-15) to 5 (range, 3-8); median QoL decreased from 37 (range, 33-40) to 14 points (range, 9-18), respectively. Extraintestinal manifestations (erythema nodosum and arthralgiae) completely remitted soon after the first infusion of infliximab. Clinical response and fistulae closure were maintained in the long-term follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: These results seem indicate that infliximab plus azathioprine may be recommended for the treatment of refractory pouchitis complicated by fistulae following IPAA for UC.     

来那度胺联合地塞米松方案对复发难治多发性骨髓瘤的治疗作用并文献复习

目的：探讨来那度胺联合地塞米松治疗复发难治多发性骨髓瘤的疗效。方法10例复发难治多发性骨髓瘤患者,一线化疗耐受,予来那度胺联合地塞米松方案治疗。结果应用该方案后,患者疾病均得到控制,M蛋白与β2微球蛋白显著下降,无完全缓解,部分缓解率为40％;至2014年7月5例进展患者的无进展生存期为8个月（5～10个月）;其余5例病情均稳定。该方案相关毒性反应较轻,患者能够耐受。结论来那度胺联合地塞米松治疗复发难治多发性骨髓瘤患者,具有一定疗效,患者耐受性好。     

联合砷剂治疗难治复发性多发性骨髓瘤疗效观察

目的探讨联合砷剂治疗难治复发多发性骨髓瘤的疗效及其应用价值。方法30例难治复发性多发性骨髓瘤患者分为2组,分别采用亚砷酸联合VAD方案化疗和亚砷酸联合VitC。其中,亚砷酸10mg/d静脉滴注,连续10天,VitC（2g/d）,连用10d,每月1次,4～6个周期判断治疗效果及毒副作用。结果联合亚砷酸化治疗难治复发性多发性骨髓瘤的总有效率为76.7%,其中显效30.0%、进步46.7%;亚砷酸＋VAD方案有效率80.0%;亚砷酸＋VitC方案有效率73.4%。长期随访16例,8例保持持续缓解状态达1年以上。主要不良反应为白细胞减少、继发感染、消化道反应、肝功能损害。结论联合砷剂治疗难治复发性多发性骨髓瘤总有效率较高,且亚砷酸联合维生素C治疗毒副反应低,耐受性好,很有临床应用前景。