中西医结合治疗湿热瘀滞型慢性非细菌性前列腺炎临床观察

目的:观察前列腺丸联合坦索罗辛治疗慢性非细菌性前列腺炎(湿热瘀滞证)的有效性和安全性。方法:采用随机、平行对照的设计方法,将180例符合纳排标准的受试者随机分为前列腺丸组(中药组)、坦索罗辛组(西药组)及前列腺丸联合坦索罗辛组(中西医结合组) 3组,治疗8周,评价治疗前后各组NIH-CPSI症状评分、中医证候评分以及中医症候疗效,同时观察不良反应的发生情况。结果:治疗8周后,中西医结合组NIH-CPSI症状评分、中医证候评分均低于西药组及中药组;中西医结合组、中药组的中医证候疗效评价全部有效,高于西药组的98.33%(P﹥0.05);中西医结合组、中药组的显效率分别为85.00%、76.67%,均高于西药组68.33%,差异具有统计学意义(P﹤0.05)。各组均未发生不良反应。结论:前列腺丸联合坦索罗辛治疗湿热瘀滞型慢性非细菌性前列腺炎的疗效优于单纯使用坦索罗辛或前列腺丸。     

通淋止痛胶囊治疗ⅢB型前列腺炎湿热瘀滞证的临床观察

目的 观察通淋止痛胶囊联合坦索罗辛治疗ⅢB型前列腺炎湿热瘀滞证的疗效和安全性。方法 选取ⅢB型前列腺炎湿热瘀滞证患者72例，随机分为对照组(前列舒通胶囊组)、治疗组(通淋止痛胶囊组)各36例。治疗4周，观察治疗后2组临床疗效、中医证侯积分、NIH-CPSI评分的不同。结果 2组总有效率比较，差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);2组中医证候积分、NLH-CPSI评分较治疗前降低(P<0.05)。结论 通淋止痛胶囊和前列舒通胶囊用于治疗ⅢB型前列腺炎湿热瘀滞证均能取得较满意疗效，且未见明显不良反应。     

金砂五淋丸联合盐酸坦索罗辛缓释胶囊治疗ⅢB型慢性前列腺炎的临床观察

目的观察金砂五淋丸联合盐酸坦索罗辛缓释胶囊治疗ⅢB型慢性前列腺炎的临床疗效。方法将120例ⅢB型慢性前列腺炎受试患者随机分为对照组和治疗组,治疗组患者口服金砂五淋丸联合盐酸坦索罗辛缓释胶囊;对照组仅服用盐酸坦索罗辛缓释胶囊,两组均以28d为治疗疗程,以美国国立卫生研究院慢性前列腺炎症状指数(NIH-CPSI)评估两组患者NIH-CPSI评分;观察两组临床疗效。结果两组患者治疗28天后,治疗总有效率对比差异具有统计学意义(P 0. 05),治疗组总有效率达93. 33%,效果满意;治疗组患者NIH-CPSI评分明显低于对照组,且差异有统计学意义(P 0. 05);两组患者用药28d期间均未发生严重药物不良反应。结论金砂五淋丸联合盐酸坦索罗辛缓释胶囊治疗ⅢB型慢性前列腺炎疗效显著。     

八味通淋方治疗ⅢB型前列腺炎(湿热瘀滞证)的临床增效作用研究

目的:观察八味通淋方联合坦索罗辛治疗ⅢB型前列腺炎(湿热瘀滞证)的临床疗效及安全性。方法:采用随机、对照方法,选择72例ⅢB型前列腺炎(湿热瘀滞证)患者,治疗组、对照组均36例。经过1个疗程(4周)治疗后,观察各组患者治疗后临床疗效、中医证侯积分、NIH-CPSI评分的变化。结果均使用SPSS19.0进行统计学分析,P≤0.05表明差异有统计学意义。结果:治疗组临床痊愈11例,显效12例,有效7例,总有效率90.91%;对照组临床痊愈6例,显效10例,有效9例,总有效率73.53%;两组疗效比较差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。治疗组在减少中医证候积分、NIH-CPSI评分方面疗效优于对照组,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论:八味通淋方联合坦索罗辛治疗ⅢB型前列腺炎(湿热瘀滞证)临床疗效满意,能明显减少中医证候积分、NIH-CPSI评分,有效缓解患者临床症状,提高生活质量,且无明显不良反应。     

前列舒通胶囊联合盐酸坦索罗辛胶囊治疗湿热瘀阻型前列腺炎临床研究

目的:探讨前列舒通胶囊联合盐酸坦索罗辛胶囊对于湿热瘀阻型前列腺炎的临床疗效。方法:利用随机数字分组方法,将96例湿热瘀阻型前列腺炎患者分成Ⅰ组(48例)和Ⅱ组(48例)。给予Ⅰ组患者盐酸坦索罗辛胶囊单药治疗;Ⅱ组在Ⅰ组治疗基础上加前列舒通胶囊治疗方案,评估Ⅰ、Ⅱ组患者治疗前及治疗8周后:美国国立卫生研究院慢性前列腺炎症状评分量表(NIH-CPSI)评分情况。前列腺液常规检查(卵磷脂小体数目、白细胞计数以及pH值)。综合评估Ⅰ、Ⅱ组患者临床总有效率情况。结果:Ⅰ、Ⅱ患者的NIH-CPSI评分较治疗前均显著降低,生活质量提升,尿道不适症状显著改善,前列腺液常规检查明显趋于正常(P<0.05);但Ⅱ组患者的NIH-CPSI各项评分(包括疼痛评分、排尿症状评分、QOL评分)及前列腺液常规检查结果较Ⅰ组恢复更为理想,Ⅱ组临床总有效率91.67%显著高于Ⅰ组72.92%(P均<0.05)。结论:前列舒通胶囊联合盐酸坦索罗辛胶囊对于湿热瘀阻型前列腺炎临床治疗效果显著。     

通瘀消炎汤联合常规医护措施治疗慢性前列腺炎临床研究

目的:观察通瘀消炎汤联合常规医护措施治疗Ⅲ型慢性前列腺炎(CP)湿热瘀滞证的临床效果。方法:选取120例患者随机分为对照组和观察组各60例。2组均口服盐酸坦索罗辛缓释胶囊、前列倍喜胶囊,并给予心理护理、饮食指导、生活方式干预等综合护理措施。观察组加予通瘀消炎汤坐浴。2组均治疗6周。治疗前、治疗6周后评定2组患者的慢性前列腺炎症状指数(NIH-CPSI)评分、中医症状评分,检测前列腺液中的锌离子(Zn2+)、前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)水平。比较2组的疾病疗效和中医证候疗效。结果:治疗后,2组NIH-CPSI疼痛不适、排尿症状、生活质量3个因子的评分及总分均较治疗前下降(P0.01),观察组3项评分及总分均低于对照组(P0.01)。观察组疾病疗效与中医证候疗效均优于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P0.05)。2组前列腺液Zn2+及PSA水平均较治疗前升高(P0.01),观察组前列腺液Zn2+及PSA水平均高于对照组(P0.01)。结论:在常规医护措施基础上加用通瘀消炎汤坐浴治疗Ⅲ型CP湿热瘀滞证患者,可有效改善前列腺功能以及CP的临床症状,提高患者的生活质量。     

中西药合用治疗慢性前列腺炎湿热瘀滞型疗效观察

目的:观察中药灌肠配合盐酸坦索罗辛口服治疗慢性前列腺炎湿热瘀滞型的临床疗效。方法:50例给予盐酸坦索罗辛缓释胶囊口服,配合中药保留灌肠,4周为一疗程,治疗2个疗程。结果:治愈17例,显效19例,有效11例,无效3例。治愈率34%,总有效率94%。治疗结束后EPS中WBC个数,最大尿流率,平均尿流率,排尿症状评分,疼痛症状评分,生活质量评分较治疗前均有降低(P0.05)。结论:中药灌肠配合盐酸坦索罗辛口服治疗慢性前列腺炎疗效较好。     

前列腺汤口服配合直肠给药治疗慢性前列腺炎血瘀湿热证58例临床观察

目的:观察前列腺汤口服配合直肠给药治疗慢性前列腺炎血瘀湿热证的临床疗效。方法:选取慢性前列腺炎血瘀湿热证患者116例,随机分为治疗组和对照组,每组各58例。对照组给予盐酸坦索罗辛缓释胶囊治疗,治疗组在对照组基础上给予前列腺汤口服配合直肠给药治疗。2组均以7 d为1个疗程,连续治疗8个疗程。观察治疗前后中医证候评分、美国国立卫生研究院慢性前列腺炎症状指数(NIH-CPSI)评分及匹兹堡睡眠质量指数量表(PSQI)评分,评价综合疗效。结果:治疗组总有效率为94.83%(55/58)、治愈率为51.72%(30/58),对照组分别为74.14%(43/58)、37.93%(22/58),2组比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。2组中医证候、NIH-CPSI及PSQI评分治疗前后组内比较及治疗后组间比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:前列腺汤口服配合直肠给药治疗慢性前列腺炎,可改善患者临床症状,提升睡眠质量,提高临床疗效。     

艾灸联合坦索罗辛缓秤胶囊治疗慢性前列腺炎15例总结

目的:观察艾灸联合坦索罗辛缓释胶囊治疗3型慢性前列腺炎(CP)的临床疗效.方法:将3型CP患者30例随机分为治疗组和对照组,每组各15例.对照组采用坦索罗辛缓释胶囊治疗,治疗组在对照组基础上联合艾灸治疗.比较治疗前后美国国立卫生研究院CP症状积分评分表(NIH-CPSI)、国际前列腺症状评分表(IPSS)、焦虑自评量表(SAS)、抑郁自评量表(SDS)评分,并评估其综合疗效.结果:总有效率治疗组为80.00％(12/15),高于对照组的53.33％(8/15),2组比较,差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05).2组治疗后NIH-CPSI、IPSS、SAS、SDS评分均较治疗前有所改善(P＜0.05或P＜0.01),且治疗组改善程度均明显优于对照组(P＜0.05或P＜0.01).结论:艾灸联合坦索罗辛缓释胶囊治疗3型CP效果显著,能缓解患者的临床症状和体征及焦虑、抑郁情绪,值得临床推广应用.     

中西医联合治疗慢性非细菌性前列腺炎疗效观察

目的:探讨八正汤剂联合盐酸坦索罗辛缓释胶囊治疗慢性非细菌性前列腺炎临床疗效观察及安全性评价。方法:选择2012年8月—2013年8月期间在本院接受诊治的慢性非细菌性前列腺炎患者96例。按照随机数字表法将96例患者随机分为对照组(48例)与治疗组(48例)。对照组给予盐酸坦索罗辛缓释胶囊;治疗组在对照组基础上给予八正汤剂。两组患者一般资料之间对比分析差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结果:治疗组治疗后总有效率(91.67%)显著高于对照组治疗后总有效率(79.17%),且有显著性差异(P<0.05);治疗组治疗后NIH-CPSI评分(11.92±6.85)显著低于对照组(17.14±7.32),且有显著性差异(P<0.05)。结论:八正汤剂联合盐酸坦索罗辛缓释胶囊治疗慢性非细菌性前列腺炎临床疗效显著,具有重要临床价值。     

清热利湿法治疗Ⅲ型前列腺炎临床观察

目的：观察清热利湿法治疗慢性前列腺炎（ⅢA类）的疗效。方法：将68例慢性前列腺炎（ⅢA类）患者随机分为对照组（64例）、治疗组（76例）两组。对照组采用前列康片治疗，治疗组应用经验方湿热清治疗，观察两组患者临床疗效及NIH—CPSI评分、EPS检查（WBC计数、卵磷脂小体）。结果：治疗组对慢性前列腺炎NIH-CPSI评分及EPS检查总有效率比较，差异有显著性。两组症状的疗效比较显示治疗组在改善患者会阴不适、小腹痛、阴茎痛、睾丸痛、性功能方面明显优于对照组，但对改善患者尿频、尿不尽感方面两组比较差异无显著性。结论：清热利湿法治疗慢性前列腺炎（ⅢA类）有较好疗效。     

Acupuncture for chronic prostatitis: A randomized controlled trial: 针刺治疗慢性前列腺炎:随机对照研究

ObjectiveTo explore whether there is a specific clinical effect of acupuncture in the treatment of chronic prostatitis.MethodsA total of 52 patients with chronic prostatitis were randomly divided into an acupuncture group (24 cases) and a placebo acupuncture group (28 cases). During the treatment, 1 case was dropped out in the placebo acupuncture group and 51 patients accomplished the clinical trial finally in two groups. In the acupuncture group, Shènshū (肾俞BL23), Zhōngliáo (中髎BL33), Huìyáng (会阳BL35) and Sānyīnjiāo (三阴交SP6) were selected. In the placebo acupuncture group, the non-meridian points located lateral to BL23, BL33, BL35 and SP6 were selected, respectively. The duration of treatment was 8 weeks in each group. In the first 4 weeks of treatment, the treatment was given once every two days, three times weekly. In the last 4 weeks of treatment, the treatment was given once every three days, twice a week. Totally, 20 acupuncture treatments were required in the whole trial. Before treatment, in week 4 and 8 of treatment and in follow-up, National Institutes of Health Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index (NIH-CPSI) score and the comprehensive effect were evaluated in the two groups successively.ResultsIn week 4 and 8 of treatment, NIH-CPSI score in the acupuncture group was lower than that before treatment, respectively (both P < 0.05). In week 8 of treatment, NIH-CPSI score in the placebo acupuncture group was lower than that before treatment (P < 0.05). NIH-CPSI score in the acupuncture group was lower than the placebo acupuncture group in week 8 of treatment (P < 0.05). In follow-up, NIH-CPSI score of the two groups all decreased as compared with the score before treatment (both P < 0.05), and the score in the acupuncture group was lower than the placebo acupuncture group (P < 0.05). In the comparison of comprehensive effect, the total effective rate was 91.7% in the acupuncture group and was 74.1% in the placebo acupuncture group. The therapeutic effect in the acupuncture group was better than that of the placebo acupuncture group (P < 0.05).ConclusionAcupuncture relieves pelvic pain and urination symptoms and has a certain of long-term effect in patients with chronic prostatitis.     

爱活尿通片联合八正散加减治疗湿热下注型慢性前列腺炎

目的:评价爱活尿通片联合八正散治疗湿热下注型前列腺炎的临床疗效。方法:将湿热下注型慢性前列腺炎患者采用用随机、对照组的方法进行研究,对治疗组82例和对照组82进行统计学分析。对照组为爱活尿通组,观察组为爱活尿通片联合八正散组,观察两组的的临床疗效。结果:两组间症状积分及NIH-CPSI评分治疗前后差值比较差异具有统计学意义,治疗组优于对照组。结论:爱活尿通片联合八正散煎剂治疗,能够明显改善湿热下注型慢性前列腺炎的症状积分与NIHCPSI评分,具有很好的临床疗效。     

湿热消腰部外敷热导入疗法治疗慢性非细菌性前列腺炎的临床研究

目的:观察湿热消腰部外敷热导入疗法对慢性非细菌性前列腺炎的临床疗效。方法:将160例慢性非细菌性前列腺炎患者随机分为治疗组和对照组,分别给予湿热消腰部外敷热导入加前列安栓、前列安栓,均以30天为1个疗程。观察治疗前后各组患者的NIH-CPSI评分、中医证候学评分、前列腺液白细胞计数及前列腺炎pH值,判断临床疗效。结果:治疗后,两组总有效率分别为84.21%和68.92%,治疗组优于对照组(P<0.05)。在NIH-CPSI评分、中医证候学评分、前列腺液白细胞计数及前列腺炎pH值方面,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论:湿热消腰部外敷热导入疗法对慢性非细菌性前列腺炎有较好的疗效。     

Chronic prostatitis treated with acupuncture and bloodletting therapy at the lumbosacral region 针刺配合腰骶刺络放血治疗慢性前列腺炎

ObjectiveTo observe the effect of acupuncture and bloodletting therapy at the lumbosacral region for chronic prostatitis.MethodsA total of 36 patients with chronic prostatitis were collected, and treated in the Department of Acupuncture and Moxibustion and the External Treatment Center of Chinese Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Shandong University of Traditional Chinese medicine. The patients were treated with acupuncture, combined with bloodletting therapy at the lumbosacral region. The treatment for 4 weeks was as one course and 2 consecutive courses of treatment were required. The therapeutic effect, including the score of the National Institute of Health – Chronic prostatitis symptom index (NIH-CPSI), was assessed.ResultsAfter 1 and 2 courses of treatment, the symptom scores and NIH-CPSI total score were all reduced as compared with that before treatment , respectively (all P < 0.01). After 2 courses of treatment, the score of each symptom and NIH-CPSI total score were reduced as compared with that after 1 course of treatment, respectively (all P < 0.01). Regrading the 3 syndromes/patterns of chronic prostatitis in the patients, i.e. downward invasion of damp heat, qi and blood stagnation and liver qi stagnation, after 1 and 2 courses of treatment, NIH-CPSI total scores were all reduced as compared with that before treatment (all P < 0.01). Additionally, after 2 courses of treatment, NIH-CPSI total score of each syndrome/pattern was reduced as compared with that after 1 course of treatment (all P < 0.01). For kidney yin deficiency, after 2 courses of treatment, NIH-CPSI total score was reduced as compared with that either before treatment or after 1 course of treatment (both P < 0.01). The total effective rate was 91.67% after 1 course of treatment and 97.22% after 2 courses of treatment. No obvious adverse events occurred during the treatment.ConclusionThe combined treatment with acupuncture and bloodletting therapy at the lumbosacral region effectively relieves the symptoms of chronic prostatitis and improves the quality of life in the patients.     

施汉章教授治疗慢性前列腺炎经验介绍

施汉章教授认为慢性前列腺炎是内外合邪致湿热蕴阻，气机升降失常，败精留滞日久则化瘀生痰，病机以肾虚为本，湿热、痰瘀为标，属本虚标实、虚实夹杂证。治疗强调微观辨证，患病早期湿热蕴阻为主者治以清热利湿，中期湿热兼夹痰瘀者治以清热利湿化瘀，久病迁延脾肾两虚为主则治以益气固肾。并注重多途径给药，进行心理疏导，取得显著疗效。     

磁疗穴位贴敷联合盐酸坦洛新缓释片治疗慢性前列腺炎90例

目的 :观察磁疗穴位贴敷联合盐酸坦洛新缓释片治疗慢性前列腺炎的临床疗效。方法 :将90例慢性前列腺炎患者随机分为治疗组和对照组,每组各45例。治疗组在服用盐酸坦洛新缓释片的基础上同时配合磁疗穴位贴敷治疗,对照组单纯服用盐酸坦洛新缓释片,共治疗2周,配合其他综合护理干预措施,比较2周后两组患者的国际前列腺炎症状(NIH-CPSI)评分、生活质量(QOL)评分及治疗总有效率。结果:治疗后,治疗组NIH-CPSI评分、QOL评分较对照组显著降低,二者差异均具有统计学意义(P0.05)。治疗组总有效率为95.56%,对照组77.78%,二者差异具有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论:磁疗穴位贴敷联合盐酸坦洛新缓释片可以明显提高治疗慢性前列腺炎的临床疗效,可作为一种新的中西医结合治疗方法在临床上推广应用。     

双固一通配穴针刺治疗慢性前列腺炎伴抑郁症疗效及对血清细胞因子的影响

目的:探讨"双固一通"配穴针刺治疗慢性前列腺炎(CP)伴抑郁症的疗效及作用机制。方法:慢性前列腺炎伴抑郁症患者60例随机分成两组各30例,"双固一通"针刺治疗组(简称针刺组)取"关元、三阴交、秩边、水道、四神聪"针刺治疗,对照组口服舍尼通和百忧解治疗,两组均以4周为1个疗程。观察治疗前后慢性前列腺炎症状积分(NIH-CPSI)、抑郁自评量表(SDS)评分和总体疗效;酶联免疫吸附测定法(ELISA)检测治疗前后两组患者血清IL-1β、TNF-α含量,并予以统计学处理。评价两种治疗方法的依从性和安全性。结果:针刺组和对照组均能显著改善CP临床症状积分(NIH-CPSI)及抑郁自评量表(SDS)评分,治疗前后差异均有统计学意义(P<0.01,或P<0.001),治疗后针刺组改善状况优于药物对照组,NIH-CPSI和SDS评分比较均显示组间差异(均P<0.01)。针刺组总有效率优于对照组,组间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗前两组IL-1β和TNF-α含量比较无差异(均P>0.05),组间具有可比性;治疗后两组患者在IL-1β和TNF-α含量表达均有降低,而且差异有统计学意义(均P<0.01);针刺组对IL-1β和TNF-α含量改善效果优于对照组,比较均显示组间差异(均P<0.01)。两组患者均无病例脱落,针刺治疗和药物治疗均未出现明显不良反应。结论:"双固一通"配穴针刺治疗和药物治疗慢性前列腺炎伴抑郁症均取得明显疗效,针刺疗效优于药物治疗;其作用机制均与针刺或药物治疗对患者血清高水平的IL-1β和TNF-α的降低有关,而且针刺作用显著优于药物的影响,两种治疗方法具有良好的依从性和安全性。     

针药并用治疗痰瘀阻络型神经性耳鸣的疗效观察

目的观察针药并用治疗痰瘀阻络型神经性耳鸣的临床疗效。方法将80例痰瘀阻络型神经性耳鸣患者随机分为治疗组和对照组,每组40例。治疗组采用针刺配合中药治疗,对照组采用单纯声信息治疗。观察两组治疗前后耳鸣残疾评估量表(THI)评分、耳鸣严重程度评分及分级的变化情况,并比较两组临床疗效。结果治疗组总有效率为82.5%,对照组为65.0%,两组比较差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组治疗后THI评分和耳鸣严重程度级别与同组治疗前比较,差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗组治疗后THI评分和耳鸣严重程度级别与对照组比较,差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论针药并用是一种治疗痰瘀阻络型神经性耳鸣的有效方法。