Impulse oscillometry in acute and stable asthmatic children: a comparison with spirometry

Objective: Lung function tests have attracted interest for the diagnosis and follow-up of childhood asthma in recent years. For patients who cannot perform forced expiratory maneuvers, impulse oscillometry (IOS), performed during spontaneous breathing, may be an alternative tool. Methods: Thirty-five acute, 107 stable asthmatic and 103 healthy children who presented to our clinic performed IOS followed by spirometry before and after salbutamol inhalation. The mean baseline and reversibility of IOS and spirometry parameters were compared between the groups. Correlation analyses were undertaken within the asthmatics, and the healthy controls separately. To distinguish the three groups, the sensitivity and specificity of baseline and reversibility values of IOS and spirometry were computed. When spirometry was taken as the gold standard, the discriminating performance of IOS to detect the airway obstruction and reversibility was investigated. Results: The mean absolute values of Zrs, R5, R5?R20, X5, X10, X15, Fres, AX, and all spirometric parameters, and the mean reversibility values of R5, R10, Fres, AX and forced expiratory volume in one second were different between the groups and the highest area under curve values to discriminate the groups was obtained from area of reactance (AX) and ΔAX. Zrs, all resistance (including R5?R20) and reactance parameters, Fres and AX were correlated with at least one spirometric parameter. Spirometric reversibility was detected by ≤?22.34 and ≤?39.05 cut-off values of ΔR5 and ΔAX, respectively. Conclusions: IOS has shown a highly significant association with spirometric indices and reversibility testing. It may be a substitute for spirometry in children who fail to perform forced expiratory maneuvers.     

Comparison of the forced oscillation technique and the interrupter technique for assessing airway obstruction and its reversibility in children

The forced oscillation technique (FOT) and interrupter technique are particularly attractive for pediatric use as they require only passive cooperation from the patient. We compared the sensitivity and specificity of these methods for detecting airway obstruction and its reversibility in 118 children (3-16 yr) with asthma or chronic nocturnal cough. FOT (R(0) and R(16)) and interruption (Rint) parameters were measured at baseline and after bronchodilator inhalation (n = 94). Rint was significantly lower than R(0), especially in children with high baseline values. Baseline parameters were normalized for height and weight [R(SD)]. In children able to perform forced expiratory maneuvers (n = 93), the best discrimination between those with baseline FEV(1) < 80% or > or = 80% of predicted values was obtained with R(0)(SD). At a specificity of 80%, R(0)(SD) yielded 66% sensitivity, whereas Rint(SD) yielded only 33% sensitivity. Similarly, postbronchodilator changes in R(0)(SD) [DeltaR(0)(SD)] yielded the best discrimination between children with and without significant reversibility in FEV(1). At a specificity of 80%, DeltaR(0)(SD) yielded 67% sensitivity and DeltaRint(SD) yielded 58% sensitivity. In children unable to perform forced expiratory maneuvers (n = 25), FOT, contrary to the interrupter technique, clearly identified a subgroup of young children with high resistance values at baseline, which returned to normal after bronchodilation. We conclude that, in asthmatic children over 3 yr old, FOT measurements provide a more reliable evaluation of bronchial obstruction and its reversibility compared with the interrupter technique, especially in young children with high baseline values.     

Impulse oscillometry: a measure for airway obstruction

The impulse oscillometry system (IOS) was introduced as a new technique to assess airflow obstruction in patients who are not able to perform forced breathing maneuvers, e.g., subjects with cerebral palsy or severe mental retardation, and young children. This study evaluates the sensitivity and specificity of IOS parameters to quantify changes in airflow obstruction in comparison with forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV(1)) and peak expiratory flow (PEF) measurements. Measurements of FEV(1), PEF, and resistance (R) and reactance (X) at frequencies of 5-35 Hz were performed in 19 children with asthma before, during, and after methacholine challenge and subsequent bronchodilatation. All parameters changed significantly during tests. Values of R5 and R10 correlated with FEV(1) (r = -0.71 and -0.73, respectively, P < 0.001), as did values of X5 and X10 (r = 0.52 and 0.57, respectively, P < 0.01). Changes in R preceded changes in PEF and FEV(1) during methacholine challenge. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve to predict a 15% fall in FEV(1) showed better sensitivity and specificity for R5 (area under the curve, 0.85) compared to PEF (0.79) or R10 (0.73). We conclude that IOS parameters can be easily used as an indirect measure of airflow obstruction. This might be helpful in patients who are not able to perform forced breathing maneuvers. In individual subjects, R values measured at 5 Hz showed to be superior to PEF measurements in the detection of a 15% fall in FEV(1).     

Predicting inadequate spirometry technique and the use of FEV1/FEV3 as an alternative to FEV1/FVC for patients with mild cognitive impairment

Introduction and Objectives: Some patients cannot perform forced vital capacity (FVC). We conducted a study to answer three questions: Can the ability to perform components of spirometry be predicted by the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE)? What proportion of subjects can perform forced expiratory volume in 3 s (FEV3) but not FVC? Does the forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1)/FEV3 ratio concord with FEV1/FVC ratio in patients with airflow obstruction? Methods: We conducted a prospective observational study of 267 patients with a mean age of 79 years, including subjects with indicators of frailty. They performed spirometry and the MMSE. Spirometric recordings were compared to the American Thoracic Society 1994 criteria. Results: FVC was achieved by 51% of patients. Inability to perform FVC was predicted by an MMSE < 24 (specificity 94%, sensitivity of 51%). An FEV1/FEV3 ratio < 80% matched a FEV1/FVC ratio < 70% (sensitivity 96%, specificity 97%). Twenty‐five percent of subjects were able to reach FEV3 but not FVC; 14% of that group had an MMSE < 24. Subjects with an MMSE < 20 were unable reliably to perform any spirometry. Conclusion: Patients with an MMSE < 24 are usually unable to reach FVC reliably when tested on a single occasion, but some can reach FEV3. Patients with MMSE < 20 cannot do spirometry. An FEV1/FEV3 ratio < 80% can be used to help identify patients with airflow obstruction if they are unable to perform full spirometry to FVC. Please cite this paper as: Allen S, Yeung P, Janczewski M and Siddique N. Predicting inadequate spirometry technique and the use of FEV1/FEV3 as an alternative to FEV1/FVC for patients with mild cognitive impairment. The Clinical Respiratory Journal 2008; 2: 208–213.     

Acceptability, reproducibility, and sensitivity of forced expiratory volumes and peak expiratory flow during bronchial challenge testing in asthmatic children.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the acceptability, reproducibility, and sensitivity of spirometric outcome measures of airway caliber during challenge testing in children. DESIGN: FEV(1), forced expiratory volume in 0.75 s, forced expiratory volume in 0.5 s, and peak expiratory flow (PEF) were recorded during stepwise dosimetric histamine challenge tests. The responses were compared, and the reproducibility at baseline and from duplicate measurements at each challenge step was determined. PATIENTS: One hundred five children with newly diagnosed asthma, aged 5 to 10 years. RESULTS: Compared to PEF, FEV(1) showed better baseline reproducibility (p = 0.002) and higher sensitivity (p < 0.0001) during challenge testing, determined as the change normalized to the baseline variation, while the forced expiratory volumes were not significantly different in these respects. During challenge testing in subjects with acceptable flow-volume tracings, paired recordings of FEV(1) agreed within 0.1 L in 85% and within 0.2 L in 93% of measurements. During challenge testing, the reproducibility of FEV(1) measurements was not better than that of the other indexes. Failure to exhale long enough precluded the use of FEV(1) in 16 of the children, particularly the youngest children. CONCLUSIONS: The results demonstrated that the recently published guidelines for FEV(1) measurements during challenge tests can be applied to children. During challenge tests in asthmatic children, the advantage of the shorter fractions of forced expiratory volume was that they were more often acceptably recorded than FEV(1), while they showed as good reproducibility and were also equally sensitive in assessing changes in airway obstruction.     

Stratifying a Risk for an Increased Variation of Airway Caliber among the Clinically Stable Asthma

BackgroundRecently, correlations of peak expiratory flow (PEF) variation have been shown to facilitate the prediction of later asthma symptoms and exacerbations. However, it has not been fully examined whether or not any patient characteristics are associated with the residual airway lability in treated asthmatics. The objective of this study is to examine a predictive marker for increased variation of PEF in patients with clinically stable asthma.MethodsWe studied 297 asthmatic patients who were monitored for PEF twice a day. Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ), spirometry, and exhaled nitric oxide fraction (FE_NO) were measured. After the assessment of baseline values, PEF measuring was continued and associations between these clinical markers and later variation of PEF over a week (Min%Max) were investigated.Results17.5% of the subjects showed increased PEF variability (Min%Max < 80%). ACQ, forced expiratory volume in 1 s % of predicted (%FEV1), and FE_NO were identified as independent predictors of Min%Max < 80%. An ACQ ≥ 0.4 yielded 96% sensitivity and 59% specificity, a %FEV₁ ≤ 85% yielded 62% sensitivity and 89% specificity, and a FE_NO ≥ 40 ppb yielded 75% sensitivity and 90% specificity for identifying the subjects with high variability in PEF. When we combine %FEV₁ ≤ 85% and FE_NO ≥ 40 ppb, this index showed the highest specificity (98%) for increased PEF variability.ConclusionsThese results indicate that ACQ, %FEV₁ and FE_NO can stratify the risk for increased variation in airway caliber among patients with stable asthma. This may help identify subjects in whom further monitoring of lung function fluctuations is indicated.     

Use of specific airway resistance to assess bronchodilator response in children

Background and objective: Changes in specific airway resistance (ΔsRaw) after bronchodilation, as measured by plethysmography and FEV₁, are frequently considered to be interchangeable indices of airway obstruction. However, the baseline relationship between these two indices is weak, and the value of ΔsRaw that best predicts FEV₁ reversibility in children has yet to be determined. The aim of this study was (i) to establish the sRaw cut‐off value that best distinguishes between positive and negative bronchodilator responses, as measured by FEV₁ reversibility; (ii) to determine whether the discrepancy between ΔsRaw and ΔFEV₁ might be explained by independent correlations between ΔFEV₁ and both ΔsRaw (mainly airway obstruction) and ΔFVC (airway closure); and (iii) to assess the effect of height and age on the relationship between ΔsRaw and ΔFEV₁. Methods: A retrospective study was performed in 481 children (median age 10.5 years, range 6.1–17.6) with actual or suspected asthma, for whom sRaw and spirometry data were obtained at baseline and after administration of a bronchodilator. Results: The sRaw cut‐off value that best predicted FEV₁ reversibility was a 42% decrease from baseline (P = 0.0001, area under the curve 0.70, sensitivity 55%, specificity 77%) and was independent of height and age. Changes in FEV₁ were significantly but independently related to ΔsRaw and ΔFVC (index of air trapping) (r = 0.40, P < 0.0001 and r = 0.39, P < 0.0001, respectively). Conclusions: A 42% decrease in sRaw predicted FEV₁ reversibility reasonably well, whereas a smaller decrease in sRaw failed to detect approximately one out of two positive responses detected by FEV₁, with no influence of height or age.     

Correlation between symptom score, wheeze, reversibility of pulmonary function tests and treatment response in asthma

Asthma management is a major concern because some asthmatic patients either do not respond or else hardly respond to treatment. Therefore in the present study, an attempt has been made to determine the predictors of treatment response in asthmatic patients. Thirty six asthmatic adults including 13 male and 23 female were studied during a 3 month treatment period. Asthma symptom score (SS) and wheezing were recorded before and after treatment. Pulmonary function tests (PFTs) including forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), peak expiratory flow (PEF), maximal expiratory measured at the beginning and the end of the study. The increase in PFT values 10 mm after 200 ?,tg inhaled salbutamol (in percentage) was considered as reversibility in airway constriction. There were significant improvements in SS (p相似文献   

Reversibility test in the early stages of bronchial asthma.

In the early stages of bronchial asthma, it is frequent to find subjects with a positive history and an FEV1 or FEV1/FVC > 80% of the predicted value. This study investigated if the test of reversibility showed a reversible airway obstruction (RAO) in 291 subjects with the above clinical and functional features. Forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), and expiratory flows (PEF, MEF50, FEF(25-75)) were registered before and 20 minutes after salbutamol administration (200 mcg by MDI). Of 291 subjects, FEV1 increased in 73 (25%) after bronchodilator > or = 12% compared to baseline; the number of subjects with a > or = 35% increase in MEF50 or FEF(25-75) were similar in terms of percentage (respectively, 29.2% and 29%), whereas those with increases in FVC (> or = 12%) and in PEF (> or = 15%) were significantly lower (respectively, 2.7% and 12.3%). The percentage of subjects with RAO (FEV1 increase after bronchodilator > or = 12%) was lower (12%) in the subgroup (108 subjects), with an MEF50 > or = 70% of the value predicted at the baseline assessment, and higher (36%) in the subjects of the subgroup (183 subjects) with an MEF50 < 70%. In conclusion, it is advisable to carry out reversibility tests in all subjects with symptoms indicative of asthma even if their functional tests are "normal" because in a considerable number of cases the RAO was found to confirm the suspected diagnosis and provided a more reliable classification of the disease.     

Estimating FVC from FEV2 and FEV3: assessment of a surrogate spirometric parameter

BACKGROUND: In the context that accurate measurement of FVC is important in diagnosing airflow obstruction and in assessing restriction, strategies to achieve reliable and accurate FVC measurement have drawn much attention. OBJECTIVES: Because the rate of achieving end-of-test criteria during spirometry has been shown to be low, with resultant under-recording of the FVC, the current study proposes a regression equation for estimating FVC from measured values of the forced expiratory volume in 2 s (FEV2) and forced expiratory volume in 3 s (FEV3). METHODS: The predictive equation for the estimated FVC from volume measurements within the first 3 s of exhalation (estimated FVC3) was generated based on 330 consecutive acceptable spirograms performed in the Cleveland Clinic Foundation Pulmonary Function Laboratory. The equation was applied to an independent validation set comprised of spirometry measurements on 370 different consecutive patients. RESULTS: In the validation spirometry sample, in which the prevalence of obstruction was 34% (based on values of the measured FEV1/FVC compared to National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey III values), the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of FEV1/estimated FVC3 for obstruction were 93.8%, 89.1%, 81.2%, and 96.9%, respectively. The misclassification rate was 9.2%. In the same cohort, the mean difference (+/- SD) between estimated FVC3 and measured FVC was 24.7 +/- 237 mL. CONCLUSIONS: Given that FVC is frequently under-recorded, with resultant overestimation of FEV1/FVC and underdiagnosis of airflow obstruction, we believe that estimating FVC from FEV2 and FEV3 can offer practical diagnostic advantages.     

Spirometry in early childhood in cystic fibrosis patients

BACKGROUND: Spirometry data in cystic fibrosis (CF) patients in early childhood is scarce, and the ability of spirometry to detect airways obstruction is debatable. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the ability of spirometry to detect airflow obstruction in CF patients in early childhood. METHODS: CF children (age range, 2.5 to 6.9 years) in stable clinical condition were recruited from five CF centers. The children performed guided spirometry (SpiroGame; patented by Dr. Vilzone, 2003). Spirometry indices were compared to values of a healthy early childhood population, and were analyzed with relation to age, gender, and clinical parameters (genotype, pancreatic status, and presence of Pseudomonas in sputum or oropharyngeal cultures). RESULTS: Seventy-six of 93 children tested performed acceptable spirometry. FVC, FEV1, forced expiratory flow in 0.5 s (FEV0.5), and forced expiratory flow at 50% of vital capacity (FEF50) were significantly lower than healthy (z scores, mean +/- SD: - 0.36 +/- 0.58, - 0.36 +/- 0.72, - 1.20 +/- 0.87; and - 1.80 +/- 1.47, respectively; p < 0.01); z scores for FEV1 and FVC were similar over the age ranges studied. However, z scores for FEV0.5 and forced expiratory flow at 25 to 75% of vital capacity were significantly lower in older children compared to younger children (p < 0.001), and a higher proportion of 6-year-old than 3-year-old children had z scores that were > 2 SDs below the mean (65% vs 5%, p < 0.03). Girls demonstrated lower FEF50 than boys (z scores: - 2.42 +/- 1.91 vs - 1.56 +/- 1.23; p < 0.001). Clinical parameters evaluated were not found to influence spirometric indices. CONCLUSIONS: Spirometry elicited by CF patients in early childhood can serve as an important noninvasive tool for monitoring pulmonary status. FEV0.5 and flow-related volumes might be more sensitive than the traditional FEV1 in detecting and portraying changes in lung function during early childhood.     

Perception of bronchodilation assessed by Visual Analogue Scale in children with asthma

BackgroundVisual Analogue Scale (VAS) has been proposed as a useful tool for assessing the perception of asthma symptoms, a cornerstone in disease management. While airway flow limitation and its reversibility are thought to be a useful marker of disease severity, there are very few studies that evaluated the response to bronchodilation (BD) testing perception by VAS. To investigate whether VAS assessment of breathlessness perception could provide a useful tool to assess the response to BD testing in asthmatic children.MethodsThis cross-sectional study included a total of 150 children (96 males, mean age 11.05 years) with asthma, 50 had bronchial obstruction (i.e. FEV₁ <80% of predicted). Perception of breathlessness was assessed by VAS; lung function was measured by spirometry. BD testing was performed in all children.ResultsIn children with bronchial obstruction, VAS at baseline was 4.7 and significantly increased to 6.9 (p < 0.001) after BD. In children without bronchial obstruction, VAS at baseline was 7.4, but further significantly increased to 8.4 after BD testing (p < 0.01). There was a significant difference in Δ VAS between children with bronchial reversibility and children without it (p < 0.0001).ConclusionsThe present study demonstrates that VAS might be considered an initial tool to assess the BD response in children with asthma, mainly with overt bronchial obstruction.     

Baseline and post-bronchodilator interrupter resistance and spirometry in asthmatic children

In children unable to perform reliable spirometry, the interrupter resistance (R_int) technique for assessing respiratory resistance is easy to perform. However, few data are available on the possibility to use R_int as a surrogate for spirometry. We aimed at comparing R_int and spirometry at baseline and after bronchodilator administration in a large population of asthmatic children. We collected retrospectively R_int and spirometry results measured in 695 children [median age 7.8 (range 4.8–13.9) years] referred to our lab for routine assessment of asthma disease. Correlations between R_int and spirometry were studied using data expressed as z‐scores. Receiver operator characteristic curves for the baseline R_int value (z‐score) and the bronchodilator effect (percentage predicted value and z‐score) were generated to assess diagnostic performance. At baseline, the relationship between raw values of R_int and FEV₁ was not linear. Despite a highly significant inverse correlation between R_int and all of the spirometry indices (FEV₁, FVC, FEV₁/FVC, FEF_25–75%; P < 0.0001), R_int could detect baseline obstruction (FEV₁ z‐score ≤ ?2) with only 42% sensitivity and 95% specificity. Post‐bronchodilator changes in R_int and FEV₁ were inversely correlated (rhô = ?0.50, P < 0.0001), and R_int (≥35% predicted value decrease) detected FEV₁ reversibility (>12% baseline increase) with 70% sensitivity and 69% specificity (AUC = 0.79). R_int measurements fitted a one‐compartment model that explained the relationship between flows and airway resistance. We found that R_int had poor sensitivity to detect baseline obstruction, but fairly good sensitivity and specificity to detect reversibility. However, in order to implement asthma guidelines for children unable to produce reliable spirometry, bronchodilator response measured by R_int should be systematically studied and further assessed in conjunction with clinical outcomes. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2012. 47:987–993. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Comparison between peak expiratory flow and FEV(1) measurements on a home spirometer and on a pneumotachograph in children with asthma

BACKGROUND: The accuracy of electronic portable home spirometers has been demonstrated in vitro using computer-based waveforms. We assessed the agreement in vivo between measurements of lung function on an electronic spirometer (Koko Peak Pro) and those obtained by the gold standard, a hospital lung function laboratory pneumotachograph. METHODS: Fifty stable asthmatic children (33 boys), aged 6-17 years, performed peak expiratory flow (PEF) and forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV(1)) measurements according to international guidelines on a portable home spirometer and on the hospital pneumotachograph in random order. All measurements complied to standard quality criteria. The PEF and FEV(1) values recorded with the home spirometer and on the hospital pneumotachograph were compared. RESULTS: All children performed reproducible high-quality measurements on both spirometers. PEF values on the home spirometer were considerably lower than on the laboratory pneumotachograph (95% CI for difference in PEF 14-30 L/min; P < 0.0001). Individual differences in PEF between the two devices could be >100 L/min. The FEV(1) values were slightly, but significantly, lower on the home spirometer (95% CI for difference in FEV(1) 0.02-0.1 L; P = 0.0018). CONCLUSIONS: A home spirometer provides reproducible and quality acceptable measures in children with asthma when performed under professional supervision and encouragement. Mean PEF and FEV(1) values recorded on this home spirometer are significantly lower than those on a hospital pneumotachograph, and individual differences may be large. Therefore, home spirometry may not be interchanged with pneumotachography in a lung function laboratory.     

The interpretation of the spirogram. How accurate is it for 'obstruction'?

The accuracy of the spirogram in detecting or excluding airway obstruction based on airflow limitation was assessed prospectively in 200 subjects, 74 with obstruction and 126 without it. The diagnosis of airway obstruction was based on a combination of clinical and body plethysmographic data. The ratio of forced expiratory volume in 1 s to forced vital capacity (FEV1/FVC %) had a sensitivity of 0.82 and a specificity of 0.98. A fixed lower limit seemed better than a lower limit based on prediction formulas. Because specificity is so much higher than sensitivity, less precise clinical information is required to confirm the presence of obstruction if FEV1/FVC % is abnormal than is needed to exclude obstruction if FEV1/FVC % is normal. Using a combination of FEV1/FVC % and the ratio of forced expiratory flow (FEF) at 50% of FVC gave a higher sensitivity with a comparable specificity when compared with FEV1/FVC % used alone. A normal value for FEF between 25% and 75% of FVC virtually ruled out obstruction, but low values had poor specificity.     

The role of computer games in measuring spirometry in healthy and "asthmatic" preschool children

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To explore the role of respiratory interactive computer games in teaching spirometry to preschool children, and to examine whether the spirometry data achieved are compatible with acceptable criteria for adults and with published data for healthy preschool children, and whether spirometry at this age can assess airway obstruction. DESIGN: Feasibility study. SETTINGS: Community kindergartens around Israel and a tertiary pediatric pulmonary clinic. PARTICIPANTS: Healthy and asthmatic preschool children (age range, 2.0 to 6.5 years). INTERVENTION: Multi-target interactive spirometry games including three targets: full inspiration before expiration, instant forced expiration, and long expiration to residual volume. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: One hundred nine healthy and 157 asthmatic children succeeded in performing adequate spirometry using a multi-target interactive spirometry game. American Thoracic Society (ATS)/European Respiratory Society spirometry criteria for adults for the start of the test, and repeatability were met. Expiration time increased with age (1.3 +/- 0.3 s at 3 years to 1.9 +/- 0.3 s at 6 years [+/- SD], p < 0.05). FVC and flow rates increased with age, while FEV1/FVC decreased. Healthy children had FVC and FEV1 values similar to those of previous preschool studies, but flows were significantly higher (> 1.5 SD for forced expiratory flow at 50% of vital capacity [FEF50] and forced expiratory flow at 75% of vital capacity [FEF75], p < 0.005). The descending part of the flow/volume curve was convex in 2.5- to 3.5-year-old patients, resembling that of infants, while in 5- to 6-year-old patients, there was linear decay. Asthma severity by Global Initiative for Asthma guidelines correlated with longer expiration time (1.7 +/- 0.4 s; p < 0.03) and lower FEF50 (32 to 63%; p < 0.001) compared to healthy children. Bronchodilators improved FEV1 by 10 to 13% and FEF50 by 38 to 56% of baseline. CONCLUSIONS: Interactive respiratory games can facilitate spirometry in very young children, yielding results that conform to most of the ATS criteria established for adults and published data for healthy preschool children. Spirometric indexes correlated with degree of asthma severity.     

Portable Spirometry During Acute Exacerbations of Asthma in Children

Background. Spirometry is the gold standard for assessment of asthma and is objective and non-invasive. This is a pilot study to evaluate whether portable spirometry can be successfully performed by children in the pediatric emergency department for acute exacerbations of asthma. Methods. We enrolled children more than 6 years of age presenting to an urban pediatric emergency department with a history of asthma during an acute exacerbation. On arrival and after each bronchodilator treatment, vital signs and a clinical score were recorded. Portable spirometry was then performed. Attempts were continued until acceptable and reproducible measurements were obtained or until the patient was unable to perform further attempts. Outcomes included success at spirometry and correlation of spirometry with clinical signs. Results. Thirty-four subjects were enrolled with a median age of 12 years. Ninety-one percent of subjects completed at least one attempt at spirometry. Seventy-three percent of all spirometry attempts were reproducible. Portable spirometry demonstrated increased severity of the exacerbation in comparison to clinical signs and peak expiratory flow. Percent of predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second, ratio of forced expiratory volume in 1 second to forced vital capacity, and peak expiratory flow are all poorly correlated with degree of wheezing, clinical score, respiratory rate, and oxygen saturation (r < 0.5). Conclusion. Portable spirometry can be successfully performed by children with acute exacerbations of asthma in the emergency department and demonstrated greater degrees of airway obstruction than did clinical signs. Spirometry provides objective, non-invasive measurements of the severity of airway obstruction in the emergency department for children with acute exacerbations of asthma.     

Assessment of a low-cost home monitoring spirometer for children

Electronic devices are now available to measure and store lung function parameters in the home. Before adopting a device for clinical or research use, it is important to validate it in the target patient group. The aim of this study was to assess a low-cost, portable, logging spirometer, the VM Plus (VM), against a standard laboratory Jaeger spirometer (JS) for use in children with respiratory disease. Seventy children with stable asthma or cystic fibrosis performed spirometry on the two devices, and results for peak expiratory flow (PEF) and forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV(1)) were compared. Comparison was made both using the two devices separately (separate method) and with the devices connected in series (series method). Reproducibility of the VM measurements was also assessed. Correlation between measurements was close (R values: separate, PEF, 0.91; FEV(1), 0.94; series, PEF, 0.97, FEV(1), 0.99), but PEF readings on the VM Plus were substantially higher than with the JS (mean difference: separate, 54.8 L/min; series, 28.2 L/min). This reflects well-reported differences in PEF measurements between the Mini-Wright PEF meter, on which the VM Plus spirometer is based, and conventional spirometers. Limits of agreement (series method) were: PEF, -13.2 to +69.6 L/min; FEV(1), -0.03 to +0.19 L. Reproducibility of VM Plus measurements was acceptable: coefficient of variation for PEF was 4%; for FEV(1), 4.3%; coefficient of reproducibility for PEF, 39 L/min; for FEV(1), 0.26 L. The VM Plus provides reasonably accurate, reproducible measurements of PEF and FEV(1), but intrinsic bias, particularly in PEF measurement, needs to be taken into account. Its potential to document longitudinal changes in lung function in children with respiratory disease at home merits further study.     

Culturally Appropriate Outreach Specialist Respiratory Medical Care Improves the Lung Function of Children in Regional and Remote Queensland

Background and Objectives

Indigenous Respiratory Outreach Care (IROC) is a culturally appropriate specialist respiratory service established to deliver multidisciplinary respiratory care to regional and remote Queensland communities. Our objective was to evaluate the impact of an outreach specialist respiratory service on the spirometry of children attending IROC clinics, particularly Indigenous children with asthma and bronchiectasis.

Methods

Retrospective single-arm cohort study of 189 children who performed spirometry at twelve sites across regional and remote Queensland between October 2010 and December 2017. Each child’s baseline spirometry was compared to their best spirometry at follow-up visit occurring within (1) 12 months of their most recent visit with at least 12 months of specialist care and; (2) each year of their first 3 years of care.

Results

Forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV₁) and forced vital capacity (FVC) z-scores improved significantly across the whole group from baseline to follow-up (change in z-scores (Δz) of FEV₁ = 0.38, 95% CI 0.22, 0.53; ΔzFVC = 0.36, 95% CI 0.21, 0.51). In subgroup analyses, lung function significantly improved in Indigenous children (n = 141, ΔzFEV₁ = 0.37, 95% CI 0.17, 0.57; ΔzFVC = 0.36, 95% CI 0.17, 0.55) including those with asthma (n = 117, ΔzFEV₁ = 0.41, 95% CI 0.19, 0.64; ΔzFVC = 0.46, 95% CI 0.24, 0.68) and bronchiectasis (n = 38, ΔzFEV₁ = 0.33, 95% CI 0.07, 0.59; ΔzFVC = 0.26, 95% CI − 0.03, 0.53). Significant improvements in FEV₁ and FVC were observed within the first and second year of follow-up for Indigenous children, but not for non-Indigenous children.

Conclusion

The IROC model of care in regional and remote settings leads to significant lung function improvement in Indigenous children with asthma and bronchiectasis.

     

Safety of sputum induction in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the safety of sputum induction in patients with varying severity of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The subjects were 28 smokers with baseline forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) of (mean and range) 1.8 (0.8-2.9) L that is 53 (28-69)% of the predicted and reversibility of 2.5 (-7.4-9.9)%. Sputum was induced after premedication with 200 microg salbutamol at increasing concentrations (0.9, 3, 4, and 5%) of hypertonic saline nebulized by an ultrasonic nebulizer. The procedure was well tolerated, and none of the patients reported major side-effects. However, the mean change from prebronchodilator FEV1 during induction was -8.5 (-23-11)%, p=0.001, and from postbronchodilator FEV1 -10.7 (-25-5)%, p<0.0001. Three (11%) of the patients had a fall in FEV1 from the prebronchodilator baseline of >20%, and a further 10 (36%) had a fall of 10-20%. Patients with greater reversibility in airway obstruction seemed to get the best benefit from the bronchodilator pretreatment, since there was an inverse relationship between reversibility in FEV1 and fall in FEV1 during induction (r=-0.4, p=0.03). It is concluded that sputum induction by hypertonic saline inhalation can cause meaningful bronchoconstriction in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, despite pretreatment with an inhaled beta2-agonist. The results highlight the importance of monitoring spirometry during sputum induction to detect bronchoconstriction.