Feasibility and diagnostic performance of the FibroScan XL probe for liver stiffness measurement in overweight and obese patients

Failure of liver stiffness measurement (LSM) by transient elastography (TE, FibroScan) and unreliable results occur in ≈ 5% and 15% of patients, respectively, mainly due to obesity. In this multicenter study, we evaluated the feasibility and performance of the novel FibroScan XL probe in 276 patients with chronic liver disease (42% viral hepatitis, 46% nonalcoholic fatty liver disease [NAFLD]) and a body mass index (BMI) ≥ 28 kg/m(2) . Patients underwent liver biopsy and TE with the standard M and XL probes. TE failure was defined as no valid LSMs and unreliable examinations as <10 valid LSMs or an interquartile range (IQR)/LSM >30% or success rate <60%. Probe performance for diagnosing ≥ F2 fibrosis and cirrhosis (F4) versus biopsy were examined using areas under receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROC). FibroScan failure was less frequent with the XL probe than the M probe (1.1% versus 16%) and the XL probe was more often reliable (73% versus 50%; both P < 0.00005). Reliable results with the XL probe were obtained in 61% of patients in whom the M probe was unreliable. Among 178 patients with ≥ 10 valid LSMs using both probes, liver stiffness was highly correlated between probes (ρ = 0.86; P < 0.0005); however, median liver stiffness was lower using the XL probe (6.8 versus 7.8 kPa; P < 0.00005). The AUROC of the XL and M probes were similar for ≥ F2 fibrosis (0.83 versus 0.86; P = 0.19) and cirrhosis (0.94 versus 0.91; P = 0.28). CONCLUSION: Compared with the M probe, the FibroScan XL probe reduces TE failure and facilitates reliable LSM in obese patients. Although the probes have comparable accuracy, lower liver stiffness cutoffs will be necessary when the XL probe is used to noninvasively assess liver fibrosis.     

Effects of a one-week treatment with acid gastric inhibitors on Helicobacter pylori-infected mice

Abstract

Background: Obesity is one of the main factors of transient elastography (TE) failure, considering body mass index (BMI) ≥28?kg/m² as a limiting factor. The XL probe was designed to overcome this limitation.

Aim: To compare the feasibility of the M and XL probes in patients with BMI ≥ 28?kg/m², to evaluate differences in mean values of controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) and liver stiffness measurement (LSM) between the two probes and find predictive factors of TE failure.

Material and methods: Prospective study, including all patients with BMI ≥ 28?kg/m² consecutively admitted for TE.

Results: Included 161 patients. Measurements with M probe were reliable in 69.6% of the patients, with 68.2% of valid measurements in obese population and 58.9% in patients with skin-capsule distance (SCD) >25?mm. In 40 patients (81.6%) with an invalid M probe measurement, a reliable result was obtained with XL probe. We found that SCD >25?mm was the only predictor of M probe failure (OR: 4.9, CI: 1.64–14.63, p?=?.004). In those patients in which TE was possible with both probes (n?=?112), mean CAP was 304?±?49?dB/m² with M probe and 301?±?50?dB/m² with XL probe (p?=?.59). Regarding liver stiffness, a mean value of 7.58?±?3.47?kpas was obtained with the M probe and 6.21?±?3.44?kpas with the XL probe (p?Conclusion: There is a reliable applicability of the M probe in a high number (68.2%) of patients with a BMI ≥30?kg/m². A SCD >25?mm was the only predictive factor of M probe failure. Mean values of LSM with XL probe were lower than those obtained with M probe.     

Feasibility of liver transient elastography with FibroScan® using a new probe for obese patients

Background & Aims: Liver stiffness measurement (LSM) failure when using transient elastography occurs in 2–10% of patients, and is generally related to obesity. The aim of this prospective study was to assess the feasibility of LSM when using a new XL probe on patients with a body mass index (BMI)≥30 kg/m². Methods: For each patient, LSM was performed using both M probe (currently available and dedicated to patients with standard morphology) and XL probe (dedicated to overweighed patients). A blood sample was taken to assess usual biological variables and simple readily available fibrosis blood tests. Results: Ninety‐nine patients were included (27 men, mean age 52 years, mean BMI 40.5 kg/m²). LSM was successful (10 valid measurements) in 45% of the cases with the M probe, vs 76% of the cases with the XL probe (P<0.001). Fifty‐nine percent of those who could not be measured (<10 valid measurements) using the M probe could successfully be measured using the XL probe. In the 44 patients successfully measured with both probes, LSM was correlated with the platelet count, prothrombin time, γ‐glutamyltransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, fasting glucose, AST platelet ratio index, Forns score and FIB‐4. Conclusion: The new XL probe allows providing a higher rate of LSM than the M probe in patients with an increased BMI and shows promising results for the evaluation of liver fibrosis.     

Bariatric Surgery in End-Stage Heart Failure: Feasibility in Successful Attainment of a Target Body Mass Index

IntroductionOrthotopic heart transplantation (OHT) is contraindicated in morbidly obese patients with end-stage heart failure (HF), for whom cardiac allograft is the only means for long-term survival. Bariatric surgery may allow them to achieve target body mass index (BMI) for OHTMethodsFrom 4/2014 to 12/2018, 26 morbidly obese HF patients who did not meet BMI eligibility criteria for OHT underwent laparoscopic bariatric surgery. Outcomes of interest were median difference in BMI, number of patients achieving target BMI for OHT, and 30-day mortality.ResultsMedian age was 49 (IQR 14) years, and 13 (50%) were women. HF was mainly systolic (15 patients, 58%). The median LVEF was 27% (IQR 37%). At the time of bariatric surgery, 12 (46%) patients had mechanical circulatory support: 2 (8%) concomitant left ventricular assist device (LVAD) placements, 8 (31%) LVAD already-in-place, and 2 (8%) intra-aortic balloon pumps. There was no 30-day mortality, but one mortality on postoperative day 48. Over a median follow-up of 6 months (range 0-36 months, IQR 17), there was a significant reduction in BMI (p<0.0001). The median postoperative BMI was 36.7 (IQR 8.7), compared to preoperative median BMI of 42.7 (IQR 9.4). Target BMI of < 35 was achieved in 11 (42%) patients. Three patients (12%) have undergone OHT.ConclusionBariatric surgery in end-stage HF is feasible and results in a high number of patients achieving target BMI, increasing their probability of undergoing OHT. The presence of a LVAD should not preclude these patients from undergoing a bariatric intervention.     

Factors associated with unreliable liver stiffness measurement and its failure with transient elastography in the Chinese population

Background and Aim: Liver stiffness measurement (LSM) with transient elastography is a non‐invasive and reliable test for liver fibrosis. However a small proportion of patients may have unreliable LSM or LSM failure. The aim of the present study was to investigate the factors associated with unreliable LSM or LSM failure in Chinese patients. Methods: We prospectively recruited liver patients for LSM. Unreliable LSM was defined as < 10 valid shots, an interquartile range (IQR)/LSM > 30%, or a success rate < 60%. LSM failure was defined as zero valid shots. Results: Among 3205 patients with LSM, 371 (11.6%) and 88 (2.7%) had unreliable LSM and LSM failure, respectively. The rates started to increase when body mass index (BMI) ≥ 28.0 kg/m². Comparing patients with BMI ≥ 28.0–29.9 kg/m² versus those with BMI ≥ 30.0 kg/m², the rates of unreliable LSM (16.4% vs 18.9%; P = 0.62) and LSM failure (11.8% vs 17.8%; P = 0.16) were similar. BMI ≥ 28.0 kg/m² was the most important factor associated with unreliable LSM (odds ratio [OR] = 2.9, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.1–3.9, P < 0.0001) and LSM failure (OR = 10.1, 95% CI = 6.4–14.2, P < 0.0001). Central obesity, defined as waist circumference > 80 cm in women and > 90 cm in men, was another independent risk factor of unreliable LSM (OR = 1.3, 95% CI = 1.0–1.6, P = 0.04) and LSM failure (OR = 5.8, 95% CI = 2.9–11.5, P < 0.0001). Conclusion: BMI ≥ 28.0 kg/m² and central obesity were the independent risk factors of unreliable LSM and LSM failure in Chinese, and these rates were significantly higher in patients with extreme BMI.     

Non-invasive assessment of liver fibrosis with transient elastography (FibroScan®): applying the cut-offs of M probe to XL probe

Background and rationale for the study. Limited studies have aimed to define the cut-offs of XL probe (XL cut-offs) for different stages of liver fibrosis, whereas those of M probe (M cut-offs) may not be applicable to XL probe. We aimed to derive appropriate XL cut-offs in overweight patients. Patients with liver stiffness measurement (LSM) by both probes were recruited. XL cut-offs probe for corresponding M cut-offs were derived from an exploratory cohort, and subsequently validated in a subgroup patients also underwent liver biopsy. The diagnostic accuracy of XL cut-offs to diagnose advanced fibrosis was evaluated.Results. Total 517 patients (63% male, mean age 58) who had reliable LSM by both probes were included in the exploratory cohort. There was a strong correlation between the LSM by M probe (LSM-M) and LSM by XL probe (LSM-XL) (r² = 0.89, p < 0.001). A decision tree using LSM-XL was learnt to predict the 3 categories of LSM-M (< 6.0kPa, 6.0–11.9kPa and ≥ 12.0kPa), and XL cut-offs at 4.8kPa and 10.7kPa were identified. These cut-offs were subsequently validated in a cohort of 147 patients who underwent liver biopsy. The overall accuracy was 89% among 62 patients whose LSM-XL < 4.8kPa or ≥ 10.7kPa. These cut-offs would have avoided under-staging of fibrosis among patients with body mass index (BMI) > 25–30 kg/m² but not > 30 kg/m².Conclusions. XL cut-offs at 4.8kPa and 10.7kPa were the best estimates of 6.0kPa and 12.0kPa of M probe for patients with BMI > 25–30 kg/m². Patients with BMI > 30 kg/m² might use M probe cut-offs for XL probe.     

Transient elastography: Kill two birds with one stone?

Assessment of liver fibrosis and steatosis is crucial in chronic liver diseases in order to determine the prognosis, the need of treatment, as well as monitor disease progression and response to treatment. Liver biopsy is limited by its invasiveness and patient acceptability. Transient elastography (TE, Fibroscan ) is a non-invasive tool with satisfactory accuracy and reproducibility to estimate liver fibrosis and steatosis. TE has been well validated in major liver diseases including chronic hepatitis B and C, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, alcoholic liver disease, primary biliary cirrhosis, and primary sclerosing cholangitis. As alanine aminotransferase (ALT) is one of the major confounding factors of liver stiffness in chronic hepatitis B, an ALT-based algorithm has been developed and higher liver stiffness measurements (LSM) cutoff values for different stages of liver fibrosis should be used in patients with elevated ALT levels up to 5 times of the upper limit of normal. Otherwise falsely-high LSM results up to cirrhotic range may occur during ALT flare. TE is also useful in predicting patient prognosis such as development of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), portal hypertension, post-operative complications in HCC patients, and also survival. Unfortunately, failed acquisition of TE is common in obese patients. Furthermore,obese patients may have higher LSM results even in the same stage of liver fibrosis. The new XL probe, a larger probe with lower ultrasound frequency and deeper penetration, increases the success rate of TE in obese patients. The median LSM value with XL probe was found to be lower than that by the conventional M probe, hence cutoff values approximately 1.2 to 1.3 kPa lower than those of M probe should be adopted. Recent studies revealed a novel ultrasonic controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) of the machine is a useful parameter to detect even low-grade steatosis noninvasively. CAP may also be used to quantify liver steatosis by applying different cutoff values. As both LSM and CAP results are instantly available at same measurement, this makes TE a very convenient tool to assess any patients who are suspected or confirmed to suffer from chronic liver diseases.     

Simplified follow-up of patients with mild chronic hepatitis C in areas with limited access to antiviral therapy

Background and aimsIn some areas of the world, antiviral therapy for chronic hepatitis C (CHC) is not available for all patients. The optimal interval for liver stiffness measures (LSM) and noninvasive scores to assess fibrosis progression has not been studied. We evaluated the usefulness of consecutive LSM, APRI, FIB-4 and Forns scores to predict disease progression.MethodsPatients with CHC and at least two annual LSM within 3 years were followed for a minimum of 5 years. Noninvasive scores were assessed. Evolution of LSM and scores were expressed as change/year (Delta).Results623 non-cirrhotic patients were included. Median baseline LSM was 6.6 kPa (IQR 5.4–8.4). During a median follow-up of 6 years, 61(9.7%) patients developed cirrhosis. Baseline LSM ≥ F2 and Forns ≥ 6.9 were the main predictors of cirrhosis (C-index 0.97). The addition of Delta variables did not improve its prediction. In patients with mild fibrosis (F0-1), progression to ≥F2 occurred in 80 (23%) within the first 3 years. Baseline BMI ≥ 24 kg/m² and LSM ≥ 5.9 kPa were associated to progression.ConclusionsBaseline LSM and Forns are highly predictive of cirrhosis development. In patients with mild CHC, BMI < 24 and LSM < 5.9, the likelihood of progression is very low, allowing for a significant spacing of noninvasive assessments over time.     

Feasibility of transient elastography versus real-time two-dimensional shear wave elastography in difficult-to-scan patients

Background and aims: Transient elastography (TE) is hampered in some patients by failures and unreliable results. We hypothesized that real time two-dimensional shear wave elastography (2D-SWE), the FibroScan XL probe, and repeated TE exams, could be used to obtain reliable liver stiffness measurements in patients with an invalid TE examination.

Methods: We reviewed 1975 patients with 5764 TE exams performed between 2007 and 2014, to identify failures and unreliable exams. Fifty-four patients with an invalid TE at their latest appointment entered a comparative feasibility study of TE vs. 2D-SWE.

Results: The initial TE exam was successful in 93% (1835/1975) of patients. Success rate increased from 89% to 96% when the XL probe became available (OR: 1.07, 95% CI 1.06–1.09). Likewise, re-examining those with a failed or unreliable TE led to a reliable TE in 96% of patients. Combining availability of the XL probe with TE re-examination resulted in a 99.5% success rate on a per-patient level. When comparing the feasibility of TE vs. 2D-SWE, 96% (52/54) of patients obtained a reliable TE, while 2D-SWE was reliable in 63% (34/54, p?Conclusions: Transient elastography can be accomplished in nearly all patients by use of the FibroScan XL probe and repeated examinations. In difficult-to-scan patients, the feasibility of TE is superior to 2D-SWE.     

Adherence to quality criteria improves concordance between transient elastography and ElastPQ for liver stiffness assessment—A multicenter retrospective study

BackgroundAssessment of liver stiffness provides important diagnostic and prognostic information in patients with chronic liver disease.AimsTo investigate whether the use of quality criteria (i) improves the concordance between transient elastography (TE) and a novel point shear wave elastography technique (ElastPQ^®) and (ii) impacts on the performance of ElastPQ^® for liver fibrosis staging using TE as the reference standard.MethodsIn this multicenter retrospective study, data of patients undergoing liver stiffness measurements (LSM) in five European centers were collected. TE was performed with FibroScan^® (Echosens, France) and ElastPQ^® with EPIQ^® or Affiniti^® systems (Philips, The Netherlands). The agreement between TE and ElastPQ^® LSMs was assessed with Lin’s concordance correlation coefficient (CCC). Diagnostic performance of ElastPQ^® was assessed by the area under receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curves.ResultsOverall, 664 patients were included: mean age: 54.8(13.5) years, main etiologies: viral hepatitis (83.1%) and NAFLD (7.5%). CCC increased significantly when LSMs with ElastPQ^® were obtained with IQR/M ≤ 30% (p < 0.001). The diagnostic performance of ElastPQ^® for fibrosis staging also increased if LSM values were obtained with IQR/M ≤ 30%.ConclusionQuality criteria should be followed when using ElastPQ^® for LSM, since the concordance with TE fibrosis staging was better at an ElastPQ^® IQR/M ≤ 30.     

Applicability and accuracy improvement of transient elastography using the M and XL probes by experienced operators

Transient elastography (TE) is the reference method to obtain liver stiffness measurements (LSM), but no results are obtained in 3.1% and unreliable in 15.8%. We assessed the applicability and diagnostic accuracy of TE re‐evaluation using M and XL probes. From March 2011 to April 2012 868 LSM were performed with the M probe by trained operators (50–500 studies) (LSM1). Measurements were categorized as inadequate (no values or ratio <60% and/or IQR/LSM >30%) or adequate. Inadequate LSM1 were re‐evaluated by experienced operators (>500 explorations) (LSM2) and inadequate LSM2 using XL probe (LSMXL). Inadequate LSM1 were obtained in 187 (21.5%) patients, IQR/LSM >30% in 97 (51%), ratio <60% in 24 (13%) and TE failed to obtain a measurement in 67 (36%). LSM2 achieved adequate registers in 123 (70%) of 175 registers previously considered as inadequate. Independent variables (OR, 95%CI) related to inadequate LSM1 were body mass index (1.11, 1.04–1.18), abdominal circumference (1.03, 1.01–1.06) and age (1.03, 1.01–1.04) and to inadequate LSM2 were skin‐capsule distance (1.21, 1.09–1.34) and abdominal circumference (1.05, 1.01–1.10). The diagnostic accuracy (AUROC) to identify significant fibrosis improved from 0.89 (LSM1) to 0.91 (LSM2) (P = 0.046) in 334 patients with liver biopsy or clinically significant portal hypertension. A third evaluation (LSMXL) obtained adequate registers in 41 (93%) of 44 patients with inadequate LSM2. Operator experience increases the applicability and diagnostic accuracy of TE. The XL probe may be recommended for patients with inadequate values obtained by experienced operators using the M probe. http://clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01900808).     

A retrospective analysis of associations between BMI and days spent on mechanical ventilation in a level 1 trauma facility

ObjectiveTo examine whether BMI impacts the outcomes of mechanically ventilated patients.MethodsData was collected retrospectively among patients involved in motor vehicle accidents in intensive care at a major trauma center in Atlanta, GA. Patients were categorized into five BMI groups: underweight (BMI < 18.5), normal weight (BMI of 18.5-24.9), overweight (BMI of 25-29.9), obese (BMI of 30-39.9), and morbidly obese (BMI of >40).ResultsAmong all patients (n=2,802), 3% of patients were underweight, 34% were of normal weight, 30% were overweight, 27% were obese, and 6% were morbidly obese. The mean number of ventilator days for normal weight patients was 4.6, whereas the mean number of ventilator days for underweight and morbidly obese patients were higher (10.3 and 7.4, respectively).ConclusionsUnderweight and morbidly obese populations may require additional interventions during their ICU stays to address the challenges presented by having an unhealthy BMI.     

Safety and efficacy of a laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the morbid and super obese patients

BackgroundAlthough a laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the gold standard treatment for symptomatic cholelithiasis, its safety and efficacy in the morbidly/super obese patients is unknown. The aim of this study was to investigate the safety and efficacy of an elective LC in the morbid/super obese patients.MethodsA retrospective review of the hospital electronic database and medical records was conducted searching for all elective LC from 2010 to 2013. The data collected included patient demographics and body mass index (BMI), length of hospital stay (LOS), duration of surgery (DOS), intra‐ and post‐operative complications, bile duct injuries, performance of an intra‐operative cholangiogram, the incidence of open conversion and the seniority of the operator.ResultsA total of 799 patients (76% female) with a mean age of 46 years and BMI of 31 were included in this study. There were significant differences in the median DOS between the three BMI groups; BMI < 26 [64 min; interquartile range (IQR) 54–83]; BMI 26–40 (72 min, IQR 58–91) and BMI > 40 (82 min, IQR 63–104), P < 0.001. There were no statistically significant differences in the LOS, peri‐operative complication rates, open conversions or bile duct injuries among the BMI groups.ConclusionsThis study showed that LC can be performed safely in the morbid/super obese patients.     

Hepatic angiogenesis and fibrosis are common features in morbidly obese patients

Background

A mass of visceral adipose tissue is one of the most important determinants of progressive liver injury in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). In accordance, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and fibrosis are believed to occur more commonly in morbidly obese patients compared with nonobese NAFLD patients.

Aim of the study

Comparative analysis of NAFLD histopathologic features and angiogenesis activity in morbidly obese and nonobese subjects.

Materials and methods

Biopsy samples from 40 severely obese (BMI ≥40 kg m^?2) and 30 nonobese (BMI ≤30 kg m^?2) NAFLD patients were examined. Kleiner’s classification was used to diagnose NASH by grading steatosis, cytoplasmatic ballooning of hepatocytes, and lobular inflammation. The severity of fibrosis was evaluated according to the liver fibrosis staging system. Qualitative and quantitative immunohistochemical analyses of VEGF A, Flk-1, and CD34 were performed to study angiogenesis and the terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP nick end-labeling (TUNEL) method was used to study hepatocyte apoptosis.

Results

Severely obese patients did not differ from nonobese patients with respect to age and sex distribution. NASH was diagnosed in nine (22.5%) severely obese patients and in seven (23.3%) nonobese patients. Fibrosis was more common in morbidly obese patients (82.5 vs. 43.5%, χ^² = 11.71, p = 0.003) and was not associated with NASH. Moreover, the severity of fibrosis was greater in obese patients, as advanced fibrosis (bridging fibrosis and cirrhosis) occurred in six (15%) severely obese patients and in two (6.7%) nonobese patients. In morbidly obese individuals, angiogenesis was independent of NASH and was activated at the stage of simple steatosis. In severe obesity, there was a positive relationship between the stage of fibrosis and angiogenic activity.

Conclusion

In severely obese patients, fibrosis is probably promoted by mechanisms independent of NASH. In these patients, angiogenesis is activated early in the natural history of NAFLD and correlates with the severity of fibrosis.     

The feasibility and reliability of transient elastography using Fibroscan?: A practice audit of 2335 examinations

BACKGROUND:

Liver stiffness measurement (LSM) using transient elastography is widely used in the management of patients with chronic liver disease.

OBJECTIVES:

To examine the feasibility and reliability of LSM, and to identify patient and operator characteristics predictive of poorly reliable results.

METHODS:

The present retrospective study investigated the frequency and determinants of poorly reliable LSM (interquartile range [IQR]/median LSM [IQR/M] >30% with median liver stiffness ≥7.1 kPa) using the FibroScan (Echosens, France) over a three-year period. Two experienced operators performed all LSMs. Multiple logistic regression analyses examined potential predictors of poorly reliable LSMs including age, sex, liver disease, the operator, operator experience (<500 versus ≥500 scans), FibroScan probe (M versus XL), comorbidities and liver stiffness. In a subset of patients, medical records were reviewed to identify obesity (body mass index ≥30 kg/m²).

RESULTS:

Between July 2008 and June 2011, 2335 patients with liver disease underwent LSM (86% using the M probe). LSM failure (no valid measurements) occurred in 1.6% (n=37) and was more common using the XL than the M probe (3.4% versus 1.3%; P=0.01). Excluding LSM failures, poorly reliable LSMs were observed in 4.9% (n=113) of patients. Independent predictors of poorly reliable LSM included older age (OR 1.03 [95% CI 1.01 to 1.05]), chronic pulmonary disease (OR 1.58 [95% CI 1.05 to 2.37), coagulopathy (OR 2.22 [95% CI 1.31 to 3.76) and higher liver stiffness (OR per kPa 1.03 [95% CI 1.02 to 1.05]), including presumed cirrhosis (stiffness ≥12.5 kPa; OR 5.24 [95% CI 3.49 to 7.89]). Sex, diabetes, the underlying liver disease and FibroScan probe were not significant. Although reliability varied according to operator (P<0.0005), operator experience was not significant. In a subanalysis including 434 patients with body mass index data, obesity influenced the rate of poorly reliable results (OR 2.93 [95% CI 0.95 to 9.05]; P=0.06).

CONCLUSIONS:

FibroScan failure and poorly reliable LSM are uncommon. The most important determinants of poorly reliable results are older age, obesity, higher liver stiffness and the operator, the latter emphasizing the need for adequate training.     

The Effect of Bariatric Surgery in the Difficult Asthma–Obesity Phenotype: A Case Report

Introduction. Obesity and asthma have become increasingly prevalent conditions in recent years; they often coexist and place a significant burden on the National Health Service. Asthma in the obese is more difficult to treat than in those with a normal body mass index (BMI) and is associated with resistance to traditional asthma therapies and increased use of healthcare resources. Weight loss can improve asthma control in such patients. The degree of weight loss achieved through dietary strategies, however, is often only modestly successful in this group. Bariatric surgery is increasingly used to achieve sustained significant weight loss in morbid obesity. It may offer under-recognized benefit in the difficult asthma–obesity phenotype. Case study. We describe the case of a 32-year-old female with difficult asthma who had a BMI of 45 kg/m² at the time of referral to our clinic. Her asthma was uncontrolled despite maximal inhaled therapy, oral therapy with Zafirlukast, and daily high-dose (25 mg) oral prednisolone. Additional therapies (subcutaneous Terbutaline and the steroid-sparing agent Methotrexate) had little impact on asthma control and she remained morbidly obese. She underwent gastric bypass surgery and, over the following 18 months, her BMI dropped to 27.7 kg/m², her corticosteroid dose was reduced to 7.5 mg (adrenal insufficiency proven), and maintenance inhaled therapy and oral medications were stopped as she maintained good asthma control. Conclusion. This case demonstrates the dramatic improvement that bariatric surgery can have on asthma symptoms and medication use in morbidly obese patients with very difficult to control asthma.     

Increased levels and adipose tissue expression of visfatin in morbidly obese women: the relationship with pro-inflammatory cytokines

Objective The controversial results on the physiopathological role of visfatin led us to examine both circulating visfatin levels and gene expression in visceral (VAT) and subcutaneous fat (SAT) in a homogeneous group of morbidly obese women. Design, patients and measurements We analysed circulating levels of several adipo/cytokines in 133 Spanish women: 40 lean (C) [body mass index (BMI) < 25 kg/m²] and 93 morbidly obese (MO) (BMI > 40 kg/m²). In the MO group, we found 31 diabetic and 62 nondiabetic subjects. We obtained follow‐up blood samples at 6 and 12 months after bariatric surgery from 30 MO patients. We determined the circulating levels of visfatin, adiponectin, interleukin‐6 (IL6), C‐reactive protein (CRP), resistin and tumour necrosis factor‐α (TNFα) by ELISA, and visfatin, adiponectin, IL6, resistin and TNFα gene expression in SAT and VAT by real‐time RT‐PCR. Results Circulating visfatin levels were higher in MO women compared with lean controls (C = 1·43 ± 0·14 μg/l, MO = 3·60 ± 0·29 μg/l, P < 0·001). After bariatric surgery‐induced weight loss, visfatin levels were reduced significantly over 12 months. Visfatin expression in SAT and VAT was similar, but significantly higher in MO compared to C and independent of the presence of diabetes mellitus. Circulating visfatin levels were positively related to IL6 and CRP levels. Visfatin gene expression in VAT and SAT was strongly related to IL6 and TNFα expression. Conclusion In a homogeneous cohort of morbidly obese women, our findings show that visfatin has a strong relationship with pro‐inflammatory factors in severe obesity.     

Non‐invasive assessment of liver fibrosis by stiffness measurement in patients with chronic hepatitis B

Background: The need for new non‐invasive tools to assess liver fibrosis in chronic liver diseases has been largely advocated. Liver stiffness measurement (LSM) using transient elastography (FibroScan^®, Echosens^?) has been shown to be correlated to liver fibrosis in various chronic liver diseases. This study aims to assess its diagnosis accuracy in patients with chronic hepatitis B. Patients and methods: We prospectively enrolled 202 patients with chronic hepatitis B in a multicentre study. Patients underwent liver biopsy (LB) and LSM. METAVIR and Ishak liver fibrosis stages were assessed by two pathologists. Results: LSM or LB was considered unreliable in 29 patients. Statistical analysis was conducted in 173 patients. LSM was significantly (P<0.001) correlated with METAVIR (r=0.65) and Ishak fibrosis stage (0.65). The area under receiver‐operating characteristic curves were 0.81 (95% confidence intervals, 0.73–0.86) for F≥2, 0.93 (0.88–0.96) for F≥3 and 0.93 (0.82–0.98) for F=4. Optimal LSM cut‐off values were 7.2 and 11.0 kPa for F≥2 and F=4, respectively, by maximizing the sum D of sensitivity and specificity, and 7.2 and 18.2 kPa by maximizing the diagnosis accuracy. Conclusion: In conclusion, LSM appears to be reliable for detection of significant fibrosis or cirrhosis in HBV patients and cut‐off values are only slightly different from those observed in HCV patients.     

Current status of bariatric surgery in the treatment of type 2 diabetes

Bariatric surgery (from the Greek words baros meaning ‘weight’ and iatrikos‘the art of healing’) is a rapidly evolving branch of surgical science. The aim is to induce major weight loss in those whose obesity places them at high risk of serious health problems. In an attempt to balance the risks of surgery against the benefits of weight loss, bariatric operations are currently performed only in the morbidly obese, or those with a body mass index (BMI) > 35 kgm^?2 who already have developed comorbidity such as type 2 diabetes. Although weight loss is beneficial for obese patients with diabetes, current medical treatment for obesity is difficult. In contrast, observational studies show a major impact of bariatric surgery on diabetes, raising the question whether this approach should be used more widely to treat diabetes in obese patients? If bariatric surgery were shown to be the best way to treat diabetes in obese subjects the implications for health services would be wide‐ranging. Bariatric surgery leads to withdrawal of diabetic treatment in about 60% or more of patients, and reductions of therapy for many others. Although data on bariatric surgery in subjects with diabetes are provocative, most studies have been uncontrolled or flawed in other ways. Most importantly, bariatric surgery has not yet been compared against standard medical treatment for diabetes in randomized controlled trials with diabetes‐specific endpoints in all relevant patient groups. Potential indications for bariatric surgery are discussed, and the unanswered questions that need to be addressed by clinical trials are summarized. Although small numbers of patients may be interested in bariatric surgery for type 2 diabetes, current data are insufficient to endorse its wide scale use for this indication. Until essential studies are undertaken the role and economics of bariatric surgery in the diabetic clinic will remain uncertain.