Clinical response to adalimumab: relationship to anti-adalimumab antibodies and serum adalimumab concentrations in rheumatoid arthritis

BACKGROUND: A substantial proportion of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) do not respond, or lose initial response, to adalimumab treatment. One explanation for non-response is that patients develop anti-adalimumab antibodies. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the incidence of formation of antibody against adalimumab and the association with serum adalimumab concentrations and clinical response. METHODS: In a cohort of 121 consecutive patients with RA treated with adalimumab, serum adalimumab concentrations and antibodies against adalimumab were measured together with clinical response variables before and up to 28 weeks after the start of treatment. RESULTS: Anti-adalimumab antibodies were detected in 21 patients (17%) during 28 weeks of treatment. EULAR non-responders had antibodies significantly more often than good responders (34% vs 5%; p = 0.032). Patients with antibodies showed less improvement in disease activity (mean (SD) delta DAS28 0.65 (1.35)) than patients without antibodies (mean delta DAS28 1.70 (1.35)) (p = 0.001). Patients with antibodies during follow-up had lower serum adalimumab concentrations at 28 weeks than patients without antibodies (median 1.2 mg/l, range 0.0-5.6 vs median 11.0 mg/l, range 2.0-33.0, respectively; p<0.001). Good responders had higher serum adalimumab concentrations than moderate responders (p = 0.021) and non-responders (p = 0.001). Concomitant methotrexate use was lower in the group with anti-adalimumab antibodies (52%) than in the group without antibodies (84%) (p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Serum antibodies against adalimumab are associated with lower serum adalimumab concentrations and non-response to adalimumab treatment.     

Immunogenicity,efficacy and adverse events of adalimumab in RA patients

To assess the immunogenicity of adalimumab, a human anti-TNF-α mAb, we evaluated the formation of antibodies to adalimumab, efficacy and adverse events among 15 patients with highly active rheumatoid arthritis. Four patients were treated with adalimumab as monotherapy, and 11 patients with concomitant DMARDs. Disease activity was measured by DAS28. The antibodies were detected by ELISA. Thirteen (87%) patients withdrew from therapy within 45 weeks and overall 13 (87%) patients showed antibodies to adalimumab including 11 patients who withdrew from therapy. In four patients without concomitant DMARDs and in nine patients with concomitant DMARDs, we detected anti-adalimumab antibodies. Overall, five of seven patients with adverse drug reactions and all nine patients with lack of efficacy were associated with the formation of antibodies. Two antibody-positive patients developed an exantheme. The results indicate that adalimumab is, in spite of its fully human sequences, immunogenic and induces antibodies in a high rate of adalimumab-treated patients.     

A pilot study of adalimumab in infliximab-allergic patients

The anti-TNF-alpha antibody infliximab (Remicade) is highly effective in the treatment of Crohn's disease. A subset of patients experience allergic reactions as a result of antibodies to infliximab (ATIs). The purpose of the current study is to describe the safety and efficacy of adalimumab (Humira) in patients previously allergic or intolerant to infliximab. Adalimumab is an anti-TNF-alpha agent containing only human peptide sequences. Seven patients have been treated with adalimumab who had experienced immediate- or delayed-hypersensitivity reactions to infliximab and one with infliximab-induced lupus. Except for injection site discomfort, adalimumab was well tolerated without signs or symptoms of allergic reactions. One patient who had previously received pooled human immunoglobulin developed a pruritic rash after each dose of adalimumab. Patients with active disease who had previously experienced a robust response to infliximab responded to adalimumab as reflected by an improvement in Harvey-Bradshaw index and inflammatory markers. Based on these preliminary data, adalimumab may be a safe and effective substitute for infliximab-allergic patients. Individuals who have been exposed to human antibodies may be sensitized to other human antibodies such as adalimumab.     

Effectiveness of infliximab after adalimumab failure in Crohn's disease

AIM: To evaluate the effectiveness of infliximab as a second-line therapy in Crohn’s disease patients after adalimumab failure.METHODS: A historical cohort study in a community-based gastroenterology practice evaluated Crohn’s disease patients treated with infliximab (induction plus maintenance) after adalimumab failure. Patients were identified using a large Spanish database (ENEIDA).RESULTS: We included 15 Crohn’s disease patients who received infliximab after adalimumab failure. Five patients discontinued adalimumab due to loss of response, 3 due to adverse events and 7 due to partial response. After infliximab therapy was started, all patients who had interrupted adalimumab due to loss of efficacy regained response. All patients who discontinued adalimumab due to adverse events responded to infliximab and maintained this response; one of these patients had an uneventful course on infliximab, but 2 developed adverse events. None of the 7 patients who interrupted adalimumab due to partial response reached remission with infliximab.CONCLUSION: Switching from adalimumab to infliximab may be useful in patients who develop adverse effects or loss of response, however, the benefit of infliximab in primary nonresponders was not established.     

Skin reaction to adalimumab

The tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα) inhibitors etanercept and infliximab have shown good clinical results in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis and other autoimmune disorders. With these novel fusion proteins, immune‐mediated side effects, among them various cutaneous reactions, have been encountered. We report herein the case of an erythema multiforme–like skin reaction to treatment with the monoclonal anti‐TNFα antibody adalimumab in a patient with rheumatoid arthritis. The reaction occurred after the sixth injection and affected the palms and soles as well as the injection site. Discontinuation of the adalimumab therapy resulted in rapid improvement of the condition. Although this patient was receiving concomitant immunomodulatory therapy with methotrexate and leflunomide, these medications were not discontinued when the reaction developed, and no other potential pathogenetic mechanisms were identified. We believe the reaction is most likely attributable to adalimumab.     

Skin reaction to adalimumab

The tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFalpha) inhibitors etanercept and infliximab have shown good clinical results in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis and other autoimmune disorders. With these novel fusion proteins, immune-mediated side effects, among them various cutaneous reactions, have been encountered. We report herein the case of an erythema multiforme-like skin reaction to treatment with the monoclonal anti-TNFalpha antibody adalimumab in a patient with rheumatoid arthritis. The reaction occurred after the sixth injection and affected the palms and soles as well as the injection site. Discontinuation of the adalimumab therapy resulted in rapid improvement of the condition. Although this patient was receiving concomitant immunomodulatory therapy with methotrexate and leflunomide, these medications were not discontinued when the reaction developed, and no other potential pathogenetic mechanisms were identified. We believe the reaction is most likely attributable to adalimumab.     

Cost effectiveness of adalimumab for the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis in the United Kingdom

OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the cost effectiveness of adalimumab vs conventional therapy in patients with active ankylosing spondylitis (AS). METHODS: The analysis was based on pooled data from two Phase III studies of adalimumab in active AS. Patients with an inadequate response to >/=1 NSAID received adalimumab 40 mg every other week (n = 246) or placebo (n = 151) for 24 weeks. A microsimulation model was developed with patients being treated with adalimumab according to the International ASAS Consensus Statement and BSR guidelines. The pooled adalimumab data, as well as data from the Outcome Assessment in AS International Study (OASIS) database and the literature, were used to model patients' BASDAI and BASFI scores and costs and health-related quality of life associated with various degrees of disease activity. Costs (in 2004 British pound) of AS, drug, administration, monitoring, hospitalization and AEs were calculated from the perspective of the UK NHS. Discounting was applied at 3.5% per year for costs and benefits as per the NICE reference case for economic evaluations. Uncertainty was addressed via sensitivity analyses. RESULTS: The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of adalimumab vs conventional therapy was estimated to improve with longer time horizons (48 weeks to 5 and 30 yrs). The central estimate was that, over 30 yrs, adalimumab therapy yielded 1.03 more quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) per patient initiating therapy. Some AS treatment-related costs were estimated to be offset by adalimumab (at 10,750 pounds/patient), leaving a total incremental cost (adalimumab vs conventional therapy) at 23,857 pounds per patient. The 30-yr ICER of adalimumab vs conventional therapy was estimated at 23 pounds 097/QALY. Sensitivity analyses demonstrated robustness of results. When indirect costs were also included (analysis from societal perspective), ICER improved to 5093 pounds/QALY. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis indicates that adalimumab, when used according to UK treatment guidelines, is cost-effective vs conventional therapy for treating AS patients.     

Tuberculous peritonitis after treatment with adalimumab

We present a case of tuberculous peritonitis in a woman with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), treated with adalimumab, and we review the association between anti-tumour necrosis factor (anti-TNF) therapy and tuberculosis. There have been only 2 case reports of peritoneal tuberculosis associated with anti-TNF and only 1 with adalimumab.     

Development of the nephrotic syndrome during treatment of Crohn's disease with adalimumab

We report a patient with Crohn's disease who presented with renal insufficiency and the nephrotic syndrome after initiating therapy with adalimumab. Renal biopsy showed stages 2 to 3 membranous glomerulonephritis, and immunostaining showed glomerular deposition of immunoglobulin G and C3. The patient's serum creatinine decreased after discontinuation of adalimumab, and treatment with prednisone and mycophenolic acid reversed his proteinuria. The pathogenesis of glomerular disease induced by antitumor necrosis factor antibodies is uncertain, and the potential roles of the generation of autoantibodies, development of antiadalimumab antibodies, and the interaction of adalimumab with glomerular tumor necrosis factor are discussed.     

Sinusitis: a possible link with adalimumab

The experience with anti-TNF agents is relatively short; and with time, we are learning more about the frequency of occurrence of different adverse events as the original trials were either too small or too brief. We report a case series of four patients who suffered from chronic inflammatory arthritis [rheumatoid arthritis (n = 3) and psoriatic arthritis (n = 1)]. Their inflammatory arthritis remained refractory to increasing doses of methotrexate up to 20 mg weekly and required an advance in treatment to TNF antagonists. However, within a few weeks of commencing these patients on adalimumab, they developed newly diagnosed recurring sinusitis. All these patients were assessed by otorhinolaryngologists, and had clinically confirmed diagnosis. The sinusitis remained refractory to standard medications; however, it resolved after the discontinuation of adalimumab. Although FDA and Irish Pharmaceutical Health Association describe that adalimumab use increases the risk of non-serious infections marginally and most of the patients continued on Humira (adalimumab) after the infection was resolved, however, our recent observation raises the concern of probable higher incidence.     

Efficacy and safety of adalimumab in Crohn's disease: meta-analysis of placebo-controlled trials

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of adalimumab in inducing and maintaining remission of Crohn's disease. METHODS: Electronic databases were searched. Placebo‐controlled trials of adalimumab used in patients with Crohn's disease were included. Data were analyzed with Review Manager 4.2. RESULTS: Four studies enrolling 1402 patients were confirmed as meeting our criteria. Remission rates of inducing and maintaining remission in patients with Crohn's disease were higher for adalimumab than placebo (P < 0.05). Adalimumab significantly improves the quality of life in patients with Crohn's disease. No significant difference in total adverse events was found in maintaining remission. Moreover, there were significantly less serious adverse events from taking adalimumab than from taking the placebo in long‐term treatment. Patients with increased baseline C‐reactive protein may benefit more from adalimumab therapy than those without. CONCLUSIONS: Adalimumab is effective and safe in Crohn's disease. However, studies of a larger number of patients are still required for better assessing the safety profile of adalimumab.     

Comparative efficacy and safety of biosimilar adalimumab and originator adalimumab in combination with methotrexate in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: a Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

We aimed to assess the relative efficacy and safety of biosimilar adalimumab and originator adalimumab plus methotrexate (MTX) compared to those of placebo plus MTX in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who showed an inadequate response to MTX. We performed a Bayesian network meta-analysis to combine direct and indirect evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) examining the efficacy and safety of biosimilar + MTX and adalimumab + MTX versus placebo + MTX (MTX group) in patients with active RA despite treatment with MTX. A total of eight RCTs involving 2543 patients met the inclusion criteria. The ACR20 response rate was significantly higher in the biosimilar + MTX (odds ratio [OR] 2.91, 95% credible interval [CrI] 1.57–5.74) and adalimumab + MTX (OR 2.80, 95% CrI 1.81–4.46) groups than in the MTX group, with no difference in the ACR20 response rate between the biosimilar + MTX and adalimumab + MTX groups. Biosimilar + MTX had the highest probability of being the best treatment in terms of the ACR20 response rate (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA]?=?0.7896), followed by adalimumab + MTX (SUCRA?=?0.7082) and MTX (SUCRA?=?0.0022). The ACR50 and ACR70 response rates showed a distribution pattern similar to that of the ACR20 response rate. Safety based on the number of serious adverse events did not differ significantly among the three interventions in the follow-up period of 12 to 24 weeks. Biosimilar and originator adalimumab, in combination with MTX, represent an effective intervention for active RA despite treatment with MTX. No significant difference was found between biosimilar and originator adalimumab in terms of efficacy and safety. However, follow-up in RCTs is short and not all safety outcomes can be assessed in RCTs. Thus, additional long-term evaluations are needed.     

Multiple organ tuberculosis of lung,pleura, and peritoneum in ankylosing spondylitis during adalimumab therapy

A case of multiple organ tuberculosis (TBc) involving lung, pleura, and peritoneum in a 39-year-old man with long-standing ankylosing spondylitis (AS) treated with adalimumab was presented. The relationship between antitumor necrosis factor-α (anti-TNF-α) therapy and TBc was also reviewed. This case illustrates that TBc can develop in multiple organs during adalimumab therapy, and thus, the awareness of serious complications of multiple organs and atypical extrapulmonary pattern of TBc during anti-TNF-α therapy needs to be increased.     

Acute bilateral phrenic neuropathy following treatment with adalimumab

The recombinant human IgG1 monoclonal antibody specific for human TNF-a adalimumab (Humira) has been recently introduced for the treatment of moderate/severe psoriasis. Neurological diseases have been rarely described as adverse events of anti-TNF agents. A case of acute respiratory failure due to diaphragmatic weakness following adalimumab therapy for psoriasis is described. A 65-year-old female patient presented with jaundice followed 2 days later by severe dyspnea and tachypnea which worsened when patient was lying flat, 1 week after the fourth dose of adalimumab. Isoniazid and vitamin B6 were co-administered with adalimumab. A symmetric elevation of diaphragms was shown on radiography and fluoroscopy. A pulmonary restrictive defect with a prominent decline of forced vital capacity (FVC) when the patient was on supine position was recorded. In the absence of specific limb electrophysiological abnormalities, acute bilateral symmetric phrenic neuropathy was diagnosed. The patient was a borderline candidate for mechanical ventilation for 3 weeks. Conservative treatment with oxygen was administered and both respiratory and liver disorder resolved 4 weeks following admission. A causal relationship of phrenal neuropathy with adalimumab is herein discussed.     

Comparative efficacy of golimumab,infliximab, and adalimumab for moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis: a network meta-analysis accounting for differences in trial designs

Aim: To conduct a network meta-analysis (NMA) to establish the comparative efficacy of infliximab, adalimumab and golimumab for the treatment of moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC). Design: A systematic literature search identified five randomized controlled trials for inclusion in the NMA. One trial assessed golimumab, two assessed infliximab and two assessed adalimumab. Outcomes included clinical response, clinical remission, mucosal healing, sustained clinical response and sustained clinical remission. Innovative methods were used to allow inclusion of the golimumab trial data given the alternative design of this trial (i.e., two-stage re-randomization). Results: After induction, no statistically significant differences were found between golimumab and adalimumab or between golimumab and infliximab. Infliximab was statistically superior to adalimumab after induction for all outcomes and treatment ranking suggested infliximab as the superior treatment for induction. Golimumab and infliximab were associated with similar efficacy for achieving maintained clinical remission and sustained clinical remission, whereas adalimumab was not significantly better than placebo for sustained clinical remission. Golimumab and infliximab were also associated with similar efficacy for achieving maintained clinical response, sustained clinical response and mucosal healing. Finally, golimumab 50 and 100 mg was statistically superior to adalimumab for clinical response and sustained clinical response, and golimumab 100 mg was also statistically superior to adalimumab for mucosal healing. Conclusion: The results of our NMA suggest that infliximab was statistically superior to adalimumab after induction, and that golimumab was statistically superior to adalimumab for sustained outcomes. Golimumab and infliximab appeared comparable in efficacy.     

The PREMIER study: A multicenter, randomized, double-blind clinical trial of combination therapy with adalimumab plus methotrexate versus methotrexate alone or adalimumab alone in patients with early, aggressive rheumatoid arthritis who had not had previous methotrexate treatment

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of adalimumab plus methotrexate (MTX) versus MTX monotherapy or adalimumab monotherapy in patients with early, aggressive rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who had not previously received MTX treatment. METHODS: This was a 2-year, multicenter, double-blind, active comparator-controlled study of 799 RA patients with active disease of < 3 years' duration who had never been treated with MTX. Treatments included adalimumab 40 mg subcutaneously every other week plus oral MTX, adalimumab 40 mg subcutaneously every other week, or weekly oral MTX. Co-primary end points at year 1 were American College of Rheumatology 50% improvement (ACR50) and mean change from baseline in the modified total Sharp score. RESULTS: Combination therapy was superior to both MTX and adalimumab monotherapy in all outcomes measured. At year 1, more patients receiving combination therapy exhibited an ACR50 response (62%) than did patients who received MTX or adalimumab monotherapy (46% and 41%, respectively; both P < 0.001). Similar superiority of combination therapy was seen in ACR20, ACR70, and ACR90 response rates at 1 and 2 years. There was significantly less radiographic progression (P < or = 0.002) among patients in the combination treatment arm at both year 1 and year 2 (1.3 and 1.9 Sharp units, respectively) than in patients in the MTX arm (5.7 and 10.4 Sharp units) or the adalimumab arm (3.0 and 5.5 Sharp units). After 2 years of treatment, 49% of patients receiving combination therapy exhibited disease remission (28-joint Disease Activity Score <2.6), and 49% exhibited a major clinical response (ACR70 response for at least 6 continuous months), rates approximately twice those found among patients receiving either monotherapy. The adverse event profiles were comparable in all 3 groups. CONCLUSION: In this population of patients with early, aggressive RA, combination therapy with adalimumab plus MTX was significantly superior to either MTX alone or adalimumab alone in improving signs and symptoms of disease, inhibiting radiographic progression, and effecting clinical remission.     

Long-term retention rates of adalimumab and infliximab in non-infectious intermediate,posterior, and panuveitis

Clinical Rheumatology - The aim of the present study was to&nbsp;compare long-term adalimumab (ADA) and infliximab (IFX) retention rates in patients with intermediate, posterior, or panuveitis....     

Observational study on the efficacy of adalimumab for the treatment of ulcerative colitis and predictors of outcome

BackgroundInformation on efficacy and predictors of response to adalimumab in ulcerative colitis (UC) clinical practice is limited.AimAssessment of response to adalimumab and its predictors in an observational cohort study.MethodsRetrospective cohort study based on data obtained from ENEIDA registry. All patients diagnosed with UC treated with adalimumab were included. Response to adalimumab was evaluated at weeks 12, 28, and 54 according to the partial Mayo score, and requirement of colectomy until end of follow-up.Results48 patients with UC treated with adalimumab were included; 39 (81.3%) had previously received infliximab. Response rates at weeks 12, 28 and 54 were 70.8%, 43.2% and 35% respectively. Response to prior treatment with infliximab was the only predictive factor of response to adalimumab at week 12, which was obtained in 90% of infliximab remitters, 53.8% of responders and 33.3% of primary non-responders (p = 0.01).Colectomy was required in 11 patients (22.9%), after a mean time of 205 days. The only clinical independent predictor of colectomy was non-response to adalimumab at week 12: colectomy rates were 5/34 (14.7%) in responders and 6/14 (42.9%) in non-responders (p = 0.035), time free of colectomy was significantly reduced in non-responders (p = 0.01). Adalimumab withdrawal due to adverse events occurred in 4.2% of patients.ConclusionThis study shows that adalimumab is an effective treatment in patients with UC. If used as a second anti-TNF, previous achievement of remission with the first anti-TNF predicts response, and failure to achieve response at week 12 predicts colectomy.     

Reversible Henoch–Schönlein purpura complicating adalimumab therapy

The tumour necrosis factor antagonists have demonstrated efficacy in the induction of remission and its maintenance in numerous chronic inflammatory conditions. These agents are generally well tolerated but with the increasing number of patients receiving anti-tumour necrosis factor-α (anti-TNFα) therapy, more adverse reactions are expected to occur. Cutaneous eruptions complicating treatment with anti-TNFα agents are common, occurring in around 20% of patients. Most reactions are mild-to-moderate and rarely warrant treatment withdrawal.We herein present a case of Henoch–Shönlein purpura (HSP) vasculitis following treatment with the monoclonal anti-TNFα antibody adalimumab for ileo-colic Crohn's disease. The reaction occurred after 18 months of adalimumab therapy and discontinuation of the anti-TNFα resulted in rapid improvement of the condition. The causal relationship has become even more likely when the purpura reappeared after restarting adalimumab. The patient started infliximab, with disease control and no cutaneous side effects.To the best of our knowledge, this is the second case report of HSP complicating adalimumab therapy. Although adalimumab is theoretically less related to immune-mediated reactions, clinicians must be aware that adverse side effects may still occur. This is the first case that shows that infliximab can be safely used in patients with adalimumab related HSP. We discuss the literature and potential causal mechanisms and propose possible approaches to its management.