Group counseling psychotherapy for patients with functional gastrointestinal disorders: development of new measures for symptom severity and quality of life

Functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGID) can benefit from various psychological interventions. The main objective here was to define the contribution of a new psychotherapeutic intervention, group counseling psychotherapy, for the management of FGID patients. Secondary aims included validation of new measures for gastrointestinal symptoms and quality of life in patients with FGID. Fifty patients seen in a tertiary care center were included in a program of 10 weekly sessions of 2 hr each. Gastrointestinal symptoms, quality of life, and psychological conditions were measured before and after treatment by quantitative indices and by qualitative self-analysis. Gastrointestinal index and quality-of-life index were significantly (P < 0.02) improved at the end of the psychotherapeutic intervention (from 77.5 ± 4.0 to 63.2 ± 4.3 and from 67.7 ± 3.9 to 54.9 ± 3.9, respectively). In a control group of patients observed for a comparable period of time while waiting for the psychotherapy program, gastrointestinal and quality of life indices remained unchanged. The severity of gastrointestinal symptoms and the quality of life deterioration were highly correlated factors (r = 0.8) at entry into the trial, and their improvement with psychotherapy was also correlated (r = 0.6; P < 0.001). Psychological abnormalities were frequent in these patients (anxiety in 31%, somatization in 29%, depression in 26% of the patients). However, no specific disorder could predict the results of the psychotherapeutic intervention. Over the long term (6–24 months after conclusion of treatment), gastrointestinal status, quality of life, and psychological condition were estimated as improved by 53%, 63%, and 67% of the patients, respectively. The gastrointestinal index and quality of life index we developed were validated to detect the disease and to follow its evolution in response to treatment. In conclusion, group counseling psychotherapy offered a significant contribution for the management, improving gastrointestinal symptoms and quality of life, of FGID patients. New measures for symptom severity and quality of life are available.     

Acupuncture for functional gastrointestinal disorders

Functional gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms are common in the general population. Especially, motor dysfunction of the GI tract and visceral hypersensitivity are important. Acupuncture has been used to treat GI symptoms in China for thousands of years. It is conceivable that acupuncture may be effective in patients with functional GI disorders because it has been shown to alter acid secretion, GI motility, and visceral pain. Acupuncture at the lower limbs (ST-36) causes muscle contractions via the somatoparasympathetic pathway, while at the upper abdomen (CV-12) it causes muscle relaxation via the somatosympathetic pathway. In some patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and functional dyspepsia (FD), peristalsis and gastric motility are impaired. The stimulatory effects of acupuncture at ST-36 on GI motility may be beneficial to patients with GERD or FD, as well as to those with constipation-predominant irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), who show delayed colonic transit. In contrast, the inhibitory effects of acupuncture at CV-12 on GI motility may be beneficial to patients with diarrhea-predominant IBS, because enhanced colonic motility and accelerated colonic transit are reported in such patients. Acupuncture at CV-12 may inhibit gastric acid secretion via the somatosympathetic pathway. Thus, acupuncture may be beneficial to GERD patients. The antiemetic effects of acupuncture at PC-6 (wrist) may be beneficial to patients with FD, whereas the antinociceptive effects of acupuncture at PC-6 and ST-36 may be beneficial to patients with visceral hypersensitivity. In the future, it is expected that acupuncture will be used in the treatment of patients with functional GI disorders.     

Heartburn in children and adolescents in the presence of functional dyspepsia and/or irritable bowel syndrome correlates with the presence of sleep disturbances,anxiety, and depression

The aim of this study was to assess the relationship of heartburn in pediatric patients with functional dyspepsia (FD) and irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) with gastrointestinal symptoms, sleep disturbances, and psychologic distress.The overlap in symptoms of FD, IBS, and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) predicts greater symptom severity and decreased quality of life and presents opportunities for improved diagnostic classification and personalized therapeutics.A cross-sectional observational study of 260 pediatric patients with abdominal pain was conducted. Patients completed standardized questionnaires assessing clinical symptoms, sleep quality, and psychologic symptoms during routine clinical care. Questionnaire data were compared for patients reporting heartburn and not reporting heartburn using χ² and t tests where appropriate.Gastrointestinal symptoms were significantly more prevalent among patients with a positive report of heartburn (vs a negative report of heartburn): pain with eating (83% vs 67%, P = .007), bloating (63% vs 44%, P = .005), acid regurgitation (47% vs 24%, P ≤ .001), and chest pain (45% vs 20%, P ≤ .001). Likewise, initiating and maintaining sleep (P = .007), arousal/nightmares (P = .046), sleep-wake transition (P = .001), hyperhidrosis during sleep (P = .016), and anxiety (P = .001) and depression (P = .0018) were also significantly increased in patients who reported heartburn versus patients who did not report heartburn.Patients with a positive report of heartburn, whether classified as having FD and/or IBS, had increased gastrointestinal symptoms, sleep disturbances, anxiety, and depression than patients with a negative report of heartburn. A better understanding of these associations may allow for personalized treatment for youth with abdominal pain and heartburn as a primary symptom.     

Symptoms of mast cell activation syndrome in functional gastrointestinal disorders

Abstract

Objectives: Mast cell involvement is evident in functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGID). FGID and mast cell activation syndrome (MCAS) are associated with multi-organ symptoms. An overlap has not been assessed.

Methods: MCAS symptoms were determined by questionnaires in 2083 FGID patients.

Results: The median number of MCAS symptoms ([IQR] (range 0–16)) was 6 [4–8] in all FGID, and in functional dyspepsia (FD) patients, 7 [5–9] in overlapping irritable bowel syndrome and FD (IBS+FD), 5 [3–8] in IBS and 5 [3–6] in non-IBS/non-FD (p?<?.001 vs. FD and IBS?+?FD) patients. MCAS symptoms in ≥2 organ-systems existed in 1773 (85%) of all patients.

Conclusions: MCAS symptoms are common in FGID warranting further mechanistic investigation.     

Heightened visceral sensation in functional gastrointestinal disease is not site-specific

Alteration in visceral sensation locally at the site of presumed symptom origin in the gastrointestinal tract has been proposed as an important etiopathological mechanism in the so-called functional bowel disorders. Patients presenting with one functional gastrointestinal syndrome, however, frequently have additional symptoms referable to other parts of the gut, suggesting that enhanced visceral nociception may be a panintestinal phenomenon. We measured the sensory thresholds for initial perception (IP), desire to defecate (DD), and urgency (U) in response to rectal balloon distension, and the thresholds for initial perception and for discomfort in response to esophageal balloon distension in 12 patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and 10 patients with functional dyspepsia (FD), in comparison with healthy controls. As expected, IBS patients exhibited lower rectal sensory thresholds than controls (P<0.0001), but in addition had significantly lower sensory thresholds for both perception and discomfort evoked by balloon distension of the esophagus (mean ±SEM: 8.8±1.3 ml vs 12.1±1.5 ml (P<0.05) and 12.2±1.4 ml vs 16.4±1.4 ml (P<0.02) respectively. Patients with FD showed similarily enhanced esophageal sensitivity, with thresholds for perception and discomfort of 8.1±0.9 ml (P<0.02), and 10.1±1.0 ml (P<0.001), respectively, but were also found to have sensory thresholds for rectal distension similar to those observed in the IBS group, significantly lower than in controls: IP 45.0±17.6 vs 59.3±1.5 ml (P<0.001), DD 98.0±17.9 vs 298.7±9.0 ml (P<0.0001), U 177.2±25.4 vs 415.1 ±12.6 ml (P<0.0001). Somatic nerve sensory thresholds showed no significant differences between the patient and control groups. Our findings indicate that alterations in visceral sensitivity in functional gastrointestinal disease affect sites in the gut other than the putative organ of symptom origin, supporting the concept of generally enhanced visceral awareness in patients with functional bowel disorders.     

Motility disorders and stress

The association between emotion and gastrointestinal dysfunction has been postulated for centuries, and all practicing clinicians have anecdotal experience of the association between stress and irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). However, definite proof of an etiologic link between stress and gut motor dysfunction remains elusive, despite the large number of publications on this topic. A critical appraisal of methodology, use of controls, data interpretation, and significance of findings in the published literature is necessary to assess the present state of knowledge and to develop more meaningful studies in the future. This review attempts to summarize these perspectives.     

Pain Hypersensitivity in Patients with Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders: A Gastrointestinal-Specific Defect or a General Systemic Condition?

Visceral hypersensitivity was shown in patients with functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGID). The mechanisms underlying this sensory dysfunction remain undetermined. The initial hypothesis of a generalized reduction in pain tolerance was rejected by further studies that suggested a normal tolerance to somatic stimuli and led to the generally accepted assumption that pain intolerance is specific and exclusive for visceral stimuli in these patients. We wanted to revisit this theory by examining whether patients with FGID reported perception and tolerance to somatic pain differently from normal subjects and whether the response to somatic pain stimulus was correlated to gastrointestinal symptoms or psychological status or distress. Thirty-three patients with FGID (Rome II criteria)(F/M: 26/7; mean age 48 ± 9.9) and 33 normal controls (F/M: 24/9; mean age 44.1 ± 6.8) were asked to immerse their nondominant hand into 4°C water for as long as possible (maximum 120 sec). Time before appearance of: (1) discomfort, (2) pain, and (3) withdrawing of the hand were noted. The intensity of pain was rated on a visual analog scale from 0 to 100. Self-report questionnaires were used to assess the severity of gastrointestinal symptoms (St-Luc GI index) and the psychological distress (SCL-90) in the patient group. Data are expressed in seconds as mean ± sem. Discomfort sensory thresholds were similar in controls and FGID patients (28 ± 3 and 24 ± 2, respectively; NS) whereas pain and withdrawing were significantly lower in FGID (41 ± 3 and 76 ± 6 sec) than in controls (62 ± 6 and 102 ± 4; P < 0.05). Pain intensity was similar in both groups (64 ± 4 vs 67 ± 3; NS). Female patients showed lower sensory thresholds than male patients and control females (pain thresholds: 39.8 ± 3.4 vs 67.8 ± 16.7 and vs 56.8 ± 8.7; P < 0.05). Sensory thresholds were not different in subgroups of patients with FGID (irritable bowel syndrome and functional dyspepsia). No correlation was shown between sensory thresholds and gastrointestinal index or SCL 90-test. In conclusion, FGID patients showed a threshold to painful somatic stimulus that was lower than in normal subjects. These findings suggest that patients with FGID may have hyperalgesia and low pain tolerance that is not limited to the viscera, but that is part of a systemic general condition.     

Prevalence and health/social impacts of functional dyspepsia in Taiwan: A study based on the Rome Criteria Questionnaire Survey assisted by endoscopic exclusion among a physical check-up population

Objective Until now, the epidemiology of functional dyspepsia (FD) and its social impact on Asians have been rarely studied. The aims of this study were to determine the prevalence, social impact, and health-seeking behaviors of FD in an apparently healthy Chinese population in Taiwan. Material and methods Based on the questionnaire provided by the Rome II working team, a survey was administered to a Taiwanese population receiving paid physical check-up (n=2865). Esophagoduodenoscopy was performed in each subject to exclude organic dyspepsia. Finally, diagnoses of functional gastrointestinal disorders were obtained by means of a computer-generated algorithm. Results The FD prevalences were 23.8% and 11.8% according to the Rome I and -II criteria, respectively. Nearly 60% of Rome I-defined FD subjects and 18.9% of Rome II-defined FD subjects had overlapping irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Irrespective of any Rome definition, FD subjects had excessive physician visits, absenteeism, and sleep disturbances compared to dyspepsia-free controls (p<0.01). Moreover, over half of the Rome II FD subjects were “consulters” showing excessive physician visits, absenteeism, and sleep disturbances than “non-consulters”. The dysmotility-like subgroup (74.5%) comprised the majority of FD subjects and showed no differences to their ulcer-like counterparts in terms of major demographic data and social and health impacts. Conclusions FD is a common complaint in Taiwan and also bears an obvious social and medical burden to society. Over half of our FD subjects sought medical help, which may be due to the readily accessible medical care in Taiwan. The newly defined Rome II criteria diminish the chance of co-existence of FD and IBS. Further FD classification by the main symptoms appears of limited clinical usefulness.     

Is there a causal link between psychological disorders and functional gastrointestinal disorders?

Psychological disorders, most notably anxiety and depressive disorders, somatization and catastrophizing, often precede or exacerbate functional gastrointestinal disorder (FGID) symptoms and correlate with symptom severity and health outcomes. Mounting evidence shows that psychological distress alters gut immunity, in particular mast cell activation, leading to a potentiation of sensory nerves and aberrant visceral pain perception. On the other hand, psychological stressors modulate the processing of incoming sensory signals by the brain, thereby contributing to FGID symptom development. A better understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying stress-induced changes in the immune system or brain processing is crucial for the development of novel beneficial therapeutic strategies.     

Pathogenic mechanisms of postinfectious functional gastrointestinal disorders: Results 3 years after gastroenteritis

Objective. Functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGID) may appear after acute gastroenteritis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the possible mechanisms (inflammation, visceral hypersensitivity, psychological and immunogenetic factors) related to the development of postinfectious (PI) FGID 3 years after a Salmonella outbreak. Material andmethods. Biopsies of the antrum, and right- and left colon from 16 PI-FGID patients, 8 PI control patients, and 18 healthy controls (H-controls) were processed for immunohistochemistry, cytokines, and mast-cell electron microscopy. DNA was typed for cytokine gene polymorphisms. Visceral sensitivity (satiety test and rectal barostat) and psychological factors (SCL-90 and vital events) were assessed. Results. The number of mast cells and T lymphocytes was similar among the groups in all locations. Mast cells within 5 µm of nerve fibers of both PI groups were increased compared to H-controls: (stomach: 5.6±1.2 versus 6.6±1.5 versus 2.5±1.1; right colon: 9.7±1.3 versus 8.0±1.3 versus 4.1±1.7; left colon: 8.9±0.9 versus 8.5±1.8 versus 2.2±2.0 per field) (p<0.05). No differences in the production of IL-1β, IL-1ra, IL-6, and IL-10 or in their genotypes were found. PI-FGID patients showed a lower pain threshold to rectal distention (29±2 versus 37± 2 mmHg; p<0.05). Scores for anxiety (0.63±0.11 versus 0.28±0.14) and somatization (1.01±0.15 versus 0.45±0.15) were higher in PI-FGID patients than in PI controls (p<0.05). The number of stressful life events was not significantly different between both PI groups. Conclusions. Three years after salmonellosis, PI-FGID patients showed no evidence of inflammation in the gastric or colonic mucosa, but visceral sensitivity and anxiety/somatization levels were increased. The close anatomical mast cell-nerve fibers relation does not seem to be related to the FGID but to the infection itself.     

A prospective assessment of bowel habit in irritable bowel syndrome in women: defining an alternator

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is subtyped as IBS with diarrhea (IBS-D) or IBS with constipation (IBS-C) based on Rome II guidelines. The remaining group is considered as having mixed IBS (IBS-M). There is no standard definition of an alternator (IBS-A), in which bowel habit changes over time. Our aim was to use Rome II criteria to prospectively assess change in bowel habit for more than 1 year to understand IBS-A. METHODS: Female patients (n=317) with IBS entering a National Institutes of Health treatment trial were studied at baseline with questionnaires and 2-week daily diary cards of pain and stool frequency and consistency. Studies were repeated at the end of treatment (3 months) and at four 3-month intervals for one more year. Algorithms to classify subjects into IBS-D, IBS-C, and IBS-M groups used diary card information and modified Rome II definitions. Changes in bowel habit at 3-month intervals were then assessed using these surrogate diary card measures. RESULTS: At baseline, 36% had IBS-D, 31% IBS-M, and 34% IBS-C. Except for stool frequency, there were no differences between groups. While the proportion of subjects in each subgroup remained the same over the year, most individuals (more than 75%) changed to either of the other 2 subtypes at least once. IBS-M was the least stable (50% changed out by 12 weeks). Patients were more likely to transition between IBS-M and IBS-C than between IBS-D and IBS-M. Notably, only 29% switched between the IBS-D and IBS-C subtypes over the year. CONCLUSIONS: While the proportion of subjects in each of the IBS subtypes stays the same, individuals commonly transition between subtypes, particularly between IBS-M and IBS-C. We recommend that IBS-A be defined as at least one change between IBS-D and IBS-C by Rome II criteria over a 1-year period.     

Prevalence and Impact of Upper and Lower Gastrointestinal Symptoms in the Greek Urban General Population

Objectives To study the prevalence of gastrointestinal symptoms in the Greek urban general population, their associations with patient characteristics, and their effect on patients’ daily activities. Material and methods The study included 700 adults from the Athens–Piraeus area selected by a 2-stage scheme based on the official maps of the Hellenic Statistic Service. Structured questionnaires were completed through personal interviews. Dyspepsia, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), and irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) were diagnosed according to widely accepted definitions. Results Of the 700 individuals, 53% reported ≥1 gastrointestinal symptom during the past week and 55% during the past 6 months (dyspepsia: 48%, GERD: 38%, IBS: 21%). Only one disorder was diagnosed in 25% (dyspepsia: 18%, GERD: 7%), and ≥2 disorders in 75% of symptomatic individuals. Dyspepsia or GERD was predominant in 7% and 16% and IBS in 28% and 19% of the patients with relevant symptoms during the past week and the past 6 months, respectively (p=0.017). Substantial symptoms during the past 6 months were reported by 60% of the symptomatic individuals. Affected daily activities were reported by 22% of symptomatic and 5% of asymptomatic individuals (p<0.001). Conclusions Gastrointestinal symptoms are highly prevalent in the Greek urban general population and are substantial in the majority of symptomatic individuals. Dyspepsia and GERD are reported much more frequently than IBS symptoms, but there is a significant overlap between symptomatic diagnoses, while the predominant diagnosis may change over time. Gastrointestinal symptoms have a significant impact on patients’ daily activities.     

Epidemiology of irritable bowel syndrome in Asia: Something old, something new, something borrowed

In this review we have unearthed epidemiological data that; support the 'old' concept of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) as a disorder of civilization, build a 'new' symptom profile of IBS for Asia, and persuade us against the use of 'borrowed' Western diagnostic criteria and illness models by Asian societies. In the 1960s, IBS was described as a disorder of civilization. Early studies from Asia suggested a prevalence of IBS below 5%. Recent studies from Asia suggest a trend for the more affluent city states like Singapore and Tokyo, to have higher prevalence of 8.6% and 9.8%, respectively, while India had the lowest prevalence of 4.2%. Furthermore, there was a trend among the better educated and more affluent strata of society in several urban Chinese populations for a higher prevalence of IBS, as well as a trend for a higher consultation rate. Across Chinese and Indian predominant populations, a majority of patients with IBS criteria report upper abdominal symptoms such as epigastric pain relieved by defecation, bloating and dyspepsia. Bloating and incomplete evacuation appear to be more important determinants of consultation behavior, than psychological factors. The failure of the Rome criteria to recognize the relationship to meals, may have led to a substantial misclassification of IBS as dyspepsia. The relevance of the Western model of psychological disturbance as a determinant of consultation behavior is questionable because of the accessibility and acceptability of medical consultation for gastrointestinal complaints in many Asian communities.     

Relationship of abdominal bloating to distention in irritable bowel syndrome and effect of bowel habit

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The relationship between the sensation of bloating, often ranked as the most bothersome symptom by patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), and actual distention manifest as an increase in abdominal girth is controversial. Investigation of this problem has been hampered by the lack of a reliable ambulatory technique to measure abdominal girth. The aim of this study was to use the technique of abdominal inductance plethysmography to compare diurnal variation in girth in IBS patients and healthy volunteers, relating these changes to the sensation of bloating. METHODS: Abdominal girth was recorded for 24 hours in 20 IBS-constipation (age, 18-73 y), 20 IBS-diarrhea (age, 25-62 y) and 10 IBS-alternating (age, 21-59 y) female patients meeting Rome II criteria and 20 healthy female controls (age, 18-67 y). All subjects pursued normal daily activities, recording their symptoms of bloating and pain together with bowel habit. RESULTS: All patients with IBS, irrespective of bowel habit, reported significantly greater bloating than controls (P < .0001). Forty-eight percent of patients also showed distention beyond the 90% control range, with this being most prominent in IBS-constipation. Bloating correlated strongly only with distention in IBS-constipation (r > or = 0.48; P < or = .02). Neither bloating nor distention in IBS was related to body mass index, age, parity, or psychologic status. CONCLUSIONS: Abdominal distention is a clearly definable phenomenon in IBS that can reach 12 cm. However, it only occurs in half of patients reporting bloating, and the 2 only correlate in IBS-constipation. Bloating and distention may differ pathophysiologically and this appears to be reflected in the bowel habit subtype.     

Is Health Care Seeking for Irritable Bowel Syndrome and Functional Dyspepsia a Socially Learned Response to Illness?

In a population-based study of 207 subjects with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) or functional dyspepsia (FD) and controls (n = 100), we aimed to determine whether dimensions of abnormal illness behavior from the Abnormal Illness Behaviour Questionnaire and aspects of social learning of illness behavior from the Social Learning of Illness Behaviour scale were independent predictors of health care seeking for IBS and FD. Results showed that dimensions of abnormal illness behavior and aspects of social learning of illness behavior (encouragement, reinforcement, and modeling) did not significantly differentiate between consulters and nonconsulters with IBS and/or FD. The Disease Conviction scale (OR = 1.55; 95% CI, 1.15–2.09) of the Abnormal Illness Behaviour Questionnaire was an independent predictor of having a diagnosis of IBS and/or FD, independent of age and gender, psychiatric diagnoses, and symptom severity. We conclude that a belief in the presence of serious pathology characterizes community subjects with IBS and FD, but not health care seeking.