Treatment discontinuation in patients with very early rheumatoid arthritis in sustained simplified disease activity index remission after synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug administration

Abstract

We aimed to identify whether drug-free remission could be achieved in patients with very early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with poor prognosis factors by treatment with synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). Thirteen patients with very early RA, whose disease was considered to have highly erosive potential, were included. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-proven bone edema and autoantibodies were determined in these patients. A treat-to-target strategy initiated with synthetic DMARDs was employed for 12 months. If the patients achieved simplified disease activity index (SDAI) remission along with a reduction of the RA MRI scoring bone edema score to <33% as compared with baseline at 12 months, DMARD treatment was stopped and the clinical status was further observed for the following 12 months. Synthetic DMARDs were stopped at 12 months in 5 patients. One of the 5 was lost to follow-up because of sustaining an injury that required orthopedic surgery. Three of the remaining 4 patients showed continued SDAI remission that was DMARD-free without any evidence of radiographic progression for the following 12 months. Although this was a small clinical trial, we have shown–for the first time–that true remission of very early RA with poor prognosis factors can be achieved by treatment with synthetic DMARDs.     

Achieving simplified disease activity index remission in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis is associated with subsequent good functional and structural outcomes in a real-world clinical setting under a treat-to-target strategy

Objective: To verify predictive validity of simplified disease activity index (SDAI) remission for subsequent functional and structural outcomes in real-world clinical settings under a treat-to-target strategy (T2T).

Methods: In this multicenter, prospective cohort study, T2T was implemented in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients with moderate-to-high disease activity. SDAI or clinical disease activity index (CDAI) was assessed every 12 weeks, and treatment was adjusted to achieve clinical remission or low disease activity (LDA). Multivariate logistic regression models were used to examine the associations of SDAI remission (≤3.3) at week 24 with the health assessment questionnaire-disability index (HAQ-DI)?≤?0.5 or with the delta van der Heijde-modified total Sharp score (ΔvdH-mTSS)?Results: Of 318 patients enrolled, 271 completed the follow-up for 72 weeks and were subjects of the analyses. Factors [odds ratio (95% confidence interval)] significantly associated with the HAQ-DI ≤0.5 were SDAI remission at week 24 [2.99 (1.42–6.28), p?=?0.004], baseline HAQ-DI [0.28 (0.18–0.45), p?=?1.3?×?10^?7], and baseline vdH-mTSS [0.986 (0.976–0.996), p?=?0.009]. A factor associated with ΔvdH-mTSS?p?=?0.002].

Conclusion: Predictive validity of SDAI remission for good outcomes was verified in a T2T-implementing cohort in the current clinical settings.     

High disease relapse after bDMARD spacing in psoriatic arthritis compared to rheumatoid arthritis and axial spondyloarthritis patients: real-life data from BIOPURE registry

The objective is to evaluate the effectiveness of a spacing strategy of bDMARDs in a cohort of selected patients in disease remission or low-disease activity (LDA) without glucocorticoids affected with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). This was a single-centre study carried out on patients prospectively enrolled in the biologic Apulian registry. Patients whose disease was in remission or LDA without taking glucocorticoids during the previous 6 months and who had agreed to increase the time interval between bDMARD doses were included in this study. Demographic and clinical characteristics were recorded at baseline and at 3, 6 and 12 months of follow-up. Endpoint of the study was the survival of spacing doses in the time lag of the study. Failure of spacing was defined as the first flare of disease. Thirty-seven RA, 28 PsA and 20 axSpA patients underwent bDMARD spacing according to a local strategy. During the follow-up, 5 RA, 6 PsA and 4 axSpA patients had a joint flare, but further 5 PsA patients manifested a skin relapse. Global persistence was 86.5% for RA (MST?=?41 (95% CI: 37–45) months) and 80% for axSpA patients (MST?=?36 (95% CI: 31–42) months). PsA patients showed a lower persistence, being of 60.7% (MST?=?30 (95% CI: 23–36) months) (log-rank test, p?=?0.03). Dose reduction by spacing bDMARD doses may be a feasible approach in patients with persistent remission/LDA activity. However, PsA patients might have greater odds of spacing failure because of skin psoriasis relapse.

DAS 28 for defining remission in rheumatoid arthritis in Indian patients

ObjectiveTo establish DAS 28 and DAS 28-3 scores that best define remission in Indian patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).Patients and MethodsAll patients diagnosed with RA visiting AIIMS, New Delhi over a period of 3 months were recruited. Clinical assessment included 28 joint counts for swelling and tenderness, duration of early morning stiffness, patient global assessment of disease activity, fatigue, joint pains and ESR. DAS 28 and DAS 28-3 scores were calculated and receiver operating characteristics curve analysis was performed to define cutoff values utilizing ‘ACR 5/6’ and ‘ACR 4/5’ remission criteria.ResultsSubjects included 207 patients (M: 44; F: 163) with mean age of 47.4 ± 12.6 years, median disease duration of 8 [4.12–14] years.‘ACR 5/6’ and ‘ACR 4/5’ criteria for remission were satisfied by 34 (16.42%) and 44 patients (21.25%) patients, respectively. DAS 28 score of 2.94 (sensitivity 84.4%, specificity 85.3%) and DAS 28-3 score of 3.02 (sensitivity 82.1%, specificity 82.4) best defined the ‘ACR 5/6’ remission. Corresponding values using ‘ACR 4/5’ remission were 3.04 (sensitivity 85.9%, specificity 84.1%) for DAS 28 and 3.05 (sensitivity 82.2%, specificity 81.8%) for DAS 28-3.ConclusionsA cutoff value < 3 for both DAS 28 and DAS 28-3 defines remission in RA in Indian patients.     

Subclinical synovitis and tenosynovitis by ultrasonography (US) 7 score in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with synthetic drugs,in clinical remission by DAS28

ObjectiveTo identify synovitis and tenosynovitis active by using the Ultrasound 7 (US 7) scoring system in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in clinical remission induced by synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs).MethodsThis is a multicentric, cross-sectional, observational study including 94 RA patients >18 years old who were in remission as defined by the 28-joints disease activity score (DAS28) <2.6 induced by synthetic DMARD during at least 6 months. Patients with a previous or current history of biologic DMARD treatment were not included in the study. Demographic and clinical data were collected by the local rheumatologist; the US evaluation was performed by a calibrated rheumatologist, who intended to detect grayscale synovitis and power Doppler (PD) using the 7-joint scale. Intra and inter-reader exercises of images between 2 ultrasonographers were realized.ResultsPatients’ mean age was 49.1 ± 13.7 years; 83% were women. The mean disease duration was 8 ± 7 years and remission lasted for 27.5 ± 31.8 months. The mean DAS28 score was 1.9 ± 0.66. Grayscale synovitis was present in 94% of cases; it was mild in 87.5% and moderate in 12.5%. Only 12.8% of the patients had PD. The metatarsophalangeal, metacarpophalangeal, and carpal joints of the dominant hand were the joints more frequently affected by synovitis. Tenosynovitis by grayscale was observed in 9 patients (9.6%). The intra and inter-reading kappa value were 0.77, p < 0.003 (CI 95%, 0.34–0.81) and 0.81, p < 0.0001 (CI 95%, 0.27–0.83) respectively.ConclusionsLow percentage of synovitis and tenosynovitis active were founded according to PD US by 7 score in RA patients under synthetic DMARDs during long remission. This score has benefit because evaluate tenosynovitis, another element of subclinical disease activity.     

Treatment discontinuation in patients with very early rheumatoid arthritis in sustained simplified disease activity index remission after synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug administration

We aimed to identify whether drug-free remission could be achieved in patients with very early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with poor prognosis factors by treatment with synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). Thirteen patients with very early RA, whose disease was considered to have highly erosive potential, were included. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-proven bone edema and autoantibodies were determined in these patients. A treat-to-target strategy initiated with synthetic DMARDs was employed for 12 months. If the patients achieved simplified disease activity index (SDAI) remission along with a reduction of the RA MRI scoring bone edema score to <33% as compared with baseline at 12 months, DMARD treatment was stopped and the clinical status was further observed for the following 12 months. Synthetic DMARDs were stopped at 12 months in 5 patients. One of the 5 was lost to follow-up because of sustaining an injury that required orthopedic surgery. Three of the remaining 4 patients showed continued SDAI remission that was DMARD-free without any evidence of radiographic progression for the following 12 months. Although this was a small clinical trial, we have shown-for the first time-that true remission of very early RA with poor prognosis factors can be achieved by treatment with synthetic DMARDs.     

Efectividad del tocilizumab intravenoso en la práctica clínica usual de una cohorte de pacientes costarricenses con artritis reumatoide

ObjectiveTo determine the effectiveness and the incidence of severe adverse events in a cohort of Costa Rican patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) treated with intravenous (IV) tocilizumab (TCZ).Patients and methodsA retrospective analysis was carried out in 45 patients that were unresponsive to disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). The study included patients who received IV TCZ every 4 weeks (4 mg/kg) along with methotrexate or leflunomide. Effectiveness was measured through the incidence of clinical remission according to a disease activity score - erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR) less than 2.6. Safety was assessed by the incidence rate of serious adverse events. An univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to assess the association of potential variables with the probability of achieving remission during the first 3 months of TCZ therapy.ResultsDuring the 3^rd month of TCZ therapy, a total of 22 patients (48.9%; 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 34.3-63.5%) achieved remission. The cumulative incidence of patients with remission at month 12 was 75.0% (n = 34) (95% CI: 62.3-87.6%). A total of 18 patients (40%; 95% CI: 25.7-54.3%) were switched to a 8 mg/kg dose due to the absence of remission. The incidence rate of serious adverse events was .98 per 100 patients/year, all of them due to infectious diseases with no fatal events reported. Only basal DAS28-ESR was associated with the probability of achieving remission at month 3.ConclusionsIV TCZ (4 mg/kg) is an effective and safe treatment for RA patients in a clinical setting in Costa Rica.     

Frequency of remissions in early rheumatoid arthritis defined by 3 sets of criteria. a 5-year followup study

OBJECTIVE: To study the frequency of remission using 3 sets of criteria in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) at 5 years after the diagnosis. METHODS: All adult patients with recent onset inflammatory arthritis who did not meet criteria or show clinical signs of other specific arthritides were included in the RA1997 inception cohort at Jyv?skyl? Central Hospital, Finland, and were assessed for remission at 5-year control examination. Remission was defined as (1) American College of Rheumatology (ACR) remission (fatigue excluded), (2) clinical remission with no tender and no swollen joints and normal erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and (3) radiographic remission with no worsening of erosions and no new erosions from baseline to 5 years. RESULTS: The study included 127 patients with early RA (mean age 56 yrs, 61% female, 54% with positive rheumatoid factor, and 25% with erosions). At 5 years, 111 patients were examined, 17% (95% CI 11%-25%) of whom met ACR remission criteria, 37% (95% CI 28%-47%) met clinical remission criteria, and 55% (95% CI 49%-68%) met radiographic remission criteria. Only 13 (12%) patients met all 3 sets of remission criteria. The rate of remission was statistically significantly different (p < 0.001) using the 3 sets. CONCLUSION: The rate of remission in RA depends on the criteria used. No gold standard exists for defining remission in RA. A set of criteria including no sign of inflammatory activity and no radiographic progression might be a basis for development of clinically relevant remission criteria for RA.     

Prognostic Factors for Sustained Remission in a “Real Life” Cohort of Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients

IntroductionRheumatoid arthritis (RA) is the most frequent chronic polyarthritis. The current goal of RA treatment is to achieve clinical remission.ObjectiveThe goal of this study was to determine the prevalence of remission in a cohort of patients from clinical practice, and to identify potentially modifiable factors associated with remission.MethodsA retrospective study was performed on a cohort of RA patients seen at the first consultation at the HUGC Rheumatology Service Dr. Negrín (HUGCDN) between first of January 2000 and thirtieth of April 2014. Sustained remission was defined as DAS28 less than 2.6 in the last two available visits in the medical history.ResultsA total of 463 patients were consecutively included, most (75%) women, with a mean age at the onset of RA of 50 years and a mean duration of the disease at follow-up of 8 years. 46% of the patients achieved sustained remission. Multiple logistic regression analyses found male sex (P = .031, OR 1.7, 95% CI 1.05–2.82), diagnosis in the first year of symptoms (P = .023, OR 1.7, 95% CI 1.07–2.69) and the initial DAS28 (P = .035) to be independent predictors for sustained remission.ConclusionsThe 46% of the patients with RA followed in the HUGC Dr. Negrín are in persistent remission, being the early diagnosis a modifiable factor predictor of remission. Thus, an objective of the Rheumatology Service should be to improve the diagnostic delay of RA in the health area.     

Risk factors of flare in rheumatoid arthritis patients with both clinical and ultrasonographic remission: a retrospective study from China

Ultrasonographic remission in addition to clinical remission is probably becoming a new target in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. The current study aimed to investigate the risk factors of flare in RA patients who achieved both clinical and ultrasonographic remission. RA patients fulfilled both clinical remission and ultrasonographic remissions were retrospectively enrolled in this study. Baseline clinical, laboratory, and ultrasonographic data were collected. Durations of clinical remission before enrollment and medication strategy during follow-up were recorded. Differences between the flare and the non-flare group were analyzed. Risk factors of flare were assessed with univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models. One hundred and twenty-one RA patients were included. Forty-eight patients relapsed during a median follow-up period of 12.3 months. The flare group had higher percentage of females, shorter duration of clinical remission before enrollment, higher baseline ESR and DAS28 (ESR), and lower baseline gray scale score. Univariate Cox regression revealed female, short duration of remission, high DAS28 (ESR), and failure to achieve 2010 ACR/EULAR remission criteria were risk factors of flare. Furthermore, multivariate analysis showed short duration of remission was the only independent risk factor of flare (HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.88–0.98, P = 0.007). One more month in duration of remission led to a reduction in flare of 7.3%. Short duration of remission at baseline could be an independent risk factor of flare in RA patients who achieved both clinical and ultrasonographic remission, which implicates the significance of sustained remission in the prognosis of RA patients.     

Current tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitor use is associated with a higher probability of remissions in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

OBJECTIVE: To determine if current tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) inhibitor use is associated with a higher probability of remission than non-use in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Clinical and demographic data were collected from 322 patients with RA during regularly scheduled clinic visits. Current and past medications were recorded. Disease activity status (remission or not) was determined using American College of Rheumatology preliminary criteria for clinical remission of RA. A logistic regression analysis was used to calculate crude and adjusted odds ratios (OR) for remission for current TNF-alpha inhibitor users versus non-users. Multivariate analysis included age, gender, race, disease duration, use of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAID), prednisone dosage, and numbers of previously used disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD). RESULTS: Of the 111 patients enrolled in the study who were users of TNF-alpha inhibitors, 25.2% were found to be in clinical remission. Of the 211 patients who were non-users, 14.7% were in clinical remission. The unadjusted OR for remission in TNF-alpha inhibitor users was 1.96 (95% confidence interval, CI: 1.10 to 3.48). The adjusted OR was 2.74 (95% CI: 1.40 to 5.34). CONCLUSION: Cross-sectional observations from an outpatient arthritis clinic found a significantly higher remission rate in patients with RA taking a TNF-alpha inhibitor compared to non-users.     

Obstacles to the implementation of the treat-to-target strategy for rheumatoid arthritis in clinical practice in Japan

Abstract

Objective. To clarify the obstacles preventing the implementation of the treat-to-target (T2T) strategy for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in clinical practice.

Methods. A total of 301 rheumatologists in Japan completed a questionnaire. In the first section, participants were indirectly questioned on the implementation of basic components of T2T, and in the second section, participants were directly questioned on their level of agreement and application.

Results. Although nearly all participants set treatment targets for the majority of RA patients with moderate to high disease activity, the proportion who set clinical remission as their target was 59%, with only 45% of these using composite measures. The proportion of participants who monitored X-rays and Health Assessment Questionnaires for all their patients was 44% and 14%, respectively. The proportion of participants who did not discuss treatment strategies was 44%, with approximately half of these reasoning that this was due to a proportion of patients having a lack of understanding of the treatment strategy or inability to make decisions. When participants were directly questioned, there was a high level of agreement with the T2T recommendations.

Conclusion. Although there was a high level of agreement with the T2T recommendations, major obstacles preventing its full implementation still remain.     

Criterios de cribado de la enfermedad pulmonar intersticial difusa asociada a la artritis reumatoide: propuesta de expertos basada en metodología Delphi

ObjectiveTo develop a joint proposal for screening criteria of interstitial lung disease (ILD) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and vice versa, which serves as a guidelines in patient referral between the Rheumatology and Pneumology departments to early detection of these patients.MethodsA systematic literature review was carried out on the risk factors for the development of ILD in RA patients, and for the referral criteria to Rheumatology for suspected early RA. Based on the available evidence, screening criteria were agreed using the Delphi method by a panel of pneumologists and rheumatologists with expertise in these pathologies.ResultsScreening criteria for ILD in patients with RA and for the early detection of RA in cases with ILD of unknown etiology have been developed. In both cases, a detection strategy was based on clinical risk factors. Recommendations also included the complementary tests to be carried out in the different clinical scenarios and on the periodicity that screening should be repeated.ConclusionA selective screening strategy is recommended for the first time in the early diagnosis of patients with ILD-RA. This multidisciplinary proposal aims to solve some common clinical questions and help decision-making, although its usefulness to identify these patients with good sensitivity must be confirmed in a validation study.     

Treat to target strategy in early rheumatoid arthritis versus routine care – A comparative clinical practice study

Objective

To assess the 2-year effect on disease activity and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of implementing a clinical practice treat-to-target (T2T) strategy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

Long-term disease and patient-reported outcomes of a continuous treat-to-target approach in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis in daily clinical practice

Patients in real life may differ from those in clinical trials. The aim of this study is to report 5-year outcomes of a continuous treat-to-target (T2T) approach in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in daily clinical practice. In the Dutch RhEumatoid Arthritis Monitoring cohort, all patients with a clinical diagnosis of RA were treated according to a protocolled T2T strategy, aimed at 28-joint Disease Activity Score (DAS28) <?2.6. Outcomes were percentages of patients in distinct levels of disease activity, mean course of DAS28 and prevalence of sustained (drug-free) remission. Also, data on functional disability (Health Assessment Questionnaire) and health-related quality of life (Short-Form 36) were examined. Mean DAS28 improved from 4.93 (95% CI 4.81–5.05) at baseline to 2.49 (95% CI 2.35–2.63) after 12 months and remained stable thereafter. Percentages of patients at 12 months with DAS28 <?2.6 (remission), DAS28 ≥?2.6 and ≤?3.2 (low disease activity), DAS28 >?3.2 and ≤?5.1 (moderate disease activity) and DAS28?>?5.1 (high disease activity) were 63, 16, 18 and 3%, respectively. Sustained remission (DAS28?<?2.6 during ≥?6 months) was observed at least once in 84% of the patients and drug-free remission (DAS28?<?2.6 during ≥?6 months after withdrawal of all disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs) in 36% of the patients. Functional disability and health-related quality of life significantly improved during the first 24 weeks. Continuous application of T2T in real-life RA patients leads to favourable disease- and patient-related outcomes.     

Recently diagnosed rheumatoid arthritis patients benefit from a treat-to-target strategy: results from the DREAM registry

Despite considerable evidence on the efficacy and safety of early aggressive treat-to-target (T2T) strategies in early rheumatoid arthritis (RA), a proportion of patients still fail to reach remission. The goal of this study is to examine remission rates and predictors of remission in a real life T2T cohort of consecutive patients with a recent diagnosis of RA. Baseline demographics, clinical, laboratory and patient-reported variables and 1-year follow-up disease activity data were used from patients with early RA included in the DREAM remission induction cohort II study. Survival analyses and simple and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to examine remission rates and significant predictors of achieving remission. A total of 137 recently diagnosed consecutive RA patients were available for this study. During the first year after inclusion, DAS28 remission was achieved at least once in 77.2 % of the patients and the median time to first remission was 17 weeks. None of the examined baseline variables were robustly associated with achieving remission within 1 year and in the multivariable analysis only lower ESR (p?=?0.005) remained significantly associated with achieving fast remission within 17 weeks. During the first year of their disease a high proportion of recently diagnosed RA patient achieved remission, with only a small percentage of patients needing bDMARD therapy. Combined with the absence of baseline predictors of remission, this suggests that clinicians in daily clinical practice may focus on DAS28 scores only, without needing to take other patients characteristics into account.     

Remission in rheumatoid arthritis: agreement of the disease activity score (DAS28) with the ARA preliminary remission criteria

OBJECTIVE: To determine which cut-off point in the RA disease activity score (DAS28) corresponds to fulfilment of the ARA criteria for clinical remission. METHODS: The disease activity of patients included in the Nijmegen RA inception cohort was systematically assessed every 3 months. For all visits, a modification of the ARA preliminary criteria for clinical remission was applied and the DAS28 was calculated. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was used to determine the cut-off point with maximum sensitivity and specificity in DAS28 corresponding with fulfilment of the modified ARA criteria. RESULTS: Three hundred and seventy-eight patients contributed 4378 visits. In 6.5% of the visits four of the five items and in 1.5% all five items of the modified ARA criteria were fulfilled. The optimal cut-off point for the DAS28 that corresponds to fulfilment of the modified ARA criteria was determined to be 2.66. CONCLUSION: DAS28 <2.6 corresponds to fulfilment of the preliminary ARA criteria for clinical remission in RA.     

Remission occurs still only in minority of rheumatoid arthritis while a tight control is achievable in a routine clinical practice – A cross section study

The current recommended target is to achieve remission, if not at least low disease activity (LDA) in management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We analysed the incidence of patients achieving LDA or in remission in a real time clinical situation in a tertiary referral rheumatology centre, at a given point of time.Materials and methodsWe reviewed 480 patients who fulfilled classification criteria for RA and who were assessed for 28 Tender Joint Count (TJC), Swollen Joint Count (SJC), ESR and CRP. Their DAS28 (3) CRP and DAS28 (3) ESR score were calculated and were classified into LDA, remission, low, moderate and high disease activity based on the DAS28 (3) score.Results5.9% and 21.9% were in remission and 12% and 10% were in LDA based on DAS28 (3) ESR and DAS28 (3) CRP respectively. There was no significant influence of duration of illness, treatment and age in attaining both LDA and remission in our population.Conclusion5.9% and 21.9% of RA were in remission based on DAS28 (3) ESR and DAS28 (3) CRP respectively and 12% and 10% of RA patients were in LDA based on DAS28 (3) ESR and DAS28 (3) CRP respectively at the point of our study. DAS (3) CRP overestimate remission compared to DAS28 (3) ESR.     

不同缓解标准下类风湿关节炎临床缓解与持续临床缓解率:一项单中心观察性研究

目的分析本中心RA队列中不同缓解标准下的临床缓解率与持续临床缓解率。方法纳入2011年1月1日至2016年12月31日所有就诊于北京大学第一医院风湿免疫科门诊的RA患者,收集首次就诊至2018年6月或末次随访的所有门诊病历资料,分别以DAS28-ESR、简化疾病活动度指数(SDAI)、临床疾病活动度指数(CDAI)、Boolean标准评价疾病活动度值和/或临床缓解状态,持续缓解定义为维持临床缓解时间>6个月。采用Kaplan-Meier生存分析计算RA患者的累积缓解率与中位达临床缓解时间。采用Cox多因素回归分析持续缓解的相关因素。结果本研究共连续纳入648例患者,在中位24个月的随访过程中,分别有510例(78.7%)、459例(70.8%)、443例(68.4%)、445例(68.7%)患者至少1次达到过临床缓解。其中,第3、6、12个月的累积临床缓解率分别为10.6%~24.4%、25.3%~43.5%、51.8%~65.2%,患者达首次临床缓解的中位时间为7.2~11.4个月。在随访过程中,分别有338例(52.2%)、302例(46.6%)、292例(45.1%)、283例(43.7%)患者至少1次实现DAS28-ESR、SDAI、CDAI和Boolean标准定义下的持续缓解。在这些达持续缓解的患者中,维持缓解状态的中位时间分别为16.0个月(DAS28-ESR),15.4个月(CDAI),14.9个月(SDAI)和15.0个月(Boolean标准)。在达到持续缓解的患者中,DMARDs单药和联合用药的比例分别为18.7%(73/390)、81.3%(317/390),此外,22.3%(87/390)的患者接受小剂量激素治疗,超过半数患者(51/87)在持续临床缓解期间减停激素。结论在临床工作中,临床缓解是切实、可行的治疗目标,经过规范的临床治疗,超过半数的患者可在治疗1年内实现临床缓解。而在实现临床缓解的患者中,大部分可实现持续临床缓解,维持缓解状态的中位时间为15个月左右。