Treatment strategies for nodal and gastrointestinal follicular lymphoma: current status and future development

In recent years,therapies for follicular lymphoma (FL) have steadily improved.A series of phase Ⅲ trials comparing the effect of rituximab with chemotherapy vs chemotherapy alone in treating FL have indicated significant improvements in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival.Recent studies have found that prolonged response durations and PFS were obtained with maintenance therapy using rituximab or interferon after completion of first line therapy.For patients with relapsed or refractory FL,ph...     

Fatal disseminated enterovirus infection in a patient with follicular lymphoma undergoing obinutuzumab maintenance therapy

Follicular lymphoma is the most common subtype of the indolent non‐Hodgkin lymphomas. Treatment usually consists of immuno‐chemotherapy and results in long‐lasting remissions in most cases. Progression‐free survival with the second‐generation anti‐CD20 antibody obinutuzumab was shown to be better than with rituximab when given in combination with either bendamustine or anthracycline‐based chemotherapy. Although treatment is generally well tolerated without an excessive rate of toxicities, there appear to be slightly more adverse events with obinutuzumab than with rituximab. Here, we report the case of a 45‐year‐old female patient that was diagnosed with a disseminated enterovirus infection while undergoing maintenance therapy with obinutuzumab after induction treatment with the combination of bendamustine and rituximab. Enterovirus RNA was detected in the blood, the cerebrospinal fluid, and the colon. A therapy with intravenous immunoglobulins was initiated since the patient presented with a severe treatment‐related immunosuppression indicated by hypogammaglobulinemia. Nonetheless, she eventually died from the enterovirus infection without evidence of lymphoma progression. This case underscores that clinicians should be aware of rare but potentially fatal infectious complications related to treatment protocols containing anti‐CD20 antibodies.     

Fludarabine‐mitoxantrone‐rituximab regimen in untreated intermediate/high‐risk follicular non‐Hodgkin's lymphoma: Experience on 142 patients

There is no international consensus on front‐line optimal chemotherapy regimen for advanced stage follicular lymphoma (FL) patients, or a clear definition of cure for this disease. Aim of this study was to test the degree of effectiveness and the safety of the regimen containing fludarabine, mitoxantrone, and rituximab in a subset of poor prognosis FL patients with particular focus on the long‐term disease‐free survival. A retrospective study was conducted on 142 intermediate/high‐risk FL patients treated in first‐line with fludarabine, mitoxantrone, and rituximab regimen. Responses, safety, and survival were evaluated. The prognostic value of positron emission tomography (PET) was also investigated in a 56‐patients subset. Overall response rate was 95.5% including 88% of complete responses. With a median follow‐up of 48 months, 18% of patients had disease relapse, yielding an estimated 12‐year disease‐free survival (DFS) of 72%. All cases showed the lymphoma recurrence within 40 months: after this timing the DFS curve presented a plateau. Overall survival was 73% at 12 years. Post‐treatment PET positivity remains a highly significant predictor of disease progression. The observed high rate of complete responses following the use of fludarabine, mitoxantrone‐based regimen in combination with rituximab seems to be the first step to improve DFS. Our study could be the starting point to consider DFS as a potential alternative endpoint of future clinical trials on FL patients. Am. J. Heamtol. 88:E273–E276, 2013. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Frontline bortezomib and rituximab for the treatment of newly diagnosed high tumour burden indolent non‐Hodgkin lymphoma: a multicentre phase II study

There is a lack of published data examining non‐cytotoxic options for the frontline treatment of patients with high‐tumour burden (HTB) indolent non‐Hodgkin lymphoma (iNHL). We completed a multicentre phase II study for patients with untreated HTB iNHL (NCT00369707) consisting of three induction cycles of weekly bortezomib and rituximab followed by an abbreviated consolidation. Forty‐two patients were treated and all were evaluable; the most common histology was follicular lymphoma (FL) (n = 33, 79%). Patient characteristics included median age 62 years (40–86); 38% bulky disease; 19% malignant effusions; 91% advanced‐stage disease; and median FL International Prognostic Index (FLIPI) score was 3. Therapy was well tolerated with few grade 3/4 toxicities including minimal neurotoxicity. On intent‐to‐treat, the overall response rate (ORR) at end of therapy was 70% with a complete remission (CR) rate of 40% (FL: ORR 76%, CR 44%). With 50‐month median follow‐up, 4‐year progression‐free survival (PFS) was 44% with 4‐year overall survival (OS) of 87% (FL: 44% and 97%, respectively). Four‐year PFS for FLIPI 0–2 vs. 3–5 was 60% vs. 26% respectively (P = 0·02), with corresponding OS rates of 92% and 81% respectively (P = 0·16). Collectively, bortezomib/rituximab is a non‐cytotoxic therapeutic regimen that was well tolerated and resulted in long‐term survival rates approximating prior rituximab/cytotoxic chemotherapy series for untreated HTB FL.     

A multicentre phase II study of vorinostat in patients with relapsed or refractory indolent B‐cell non‐Hodgkin lymphoma and mantle cell lymphoma

Although initial rituximab‐containing chemotherapies achieve high response rates, indolent B‐cell non‐Hodgkin lymphoma (B‐NHL), such as follicular lymphoma (FL), is still incurable. Therefore, new effective agents with novel mechanisms are anticipated. In this multicentre phase II study, patients with relapsed/refractory indolent B‐NHL and mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) received vorinostat 200 mg twice daily for 14 consecutive days in a 21‐d cycle until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) in FL patients and safety and tolerability in all patients. Secondary endpoints included progression‐free survival (PFS). Fifty‐six eligible patients were enrolled; 50 patients (39 with FL, seven with other B‐NHL, and four with MCL) were evaluable for ORR, and 40 patients had received rituximab‐containing prior chemotherapeutic regimens. For the 39 patients with FL, the ORR was 49% [95% confidence interval (CI): 32·4, 65·2] and the median PFS was 20 months (95% CI: 11·2, 29·7). Major toxicities were manageable grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia and neutropenia. Vorinostat offers sustained antitumour activity in patients with relapsed or refractory FL with an acceptable safety profile. Further investigation of vorinostat for clinical efficacy is warranted.     

Advances in first‐line treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia: current recommendations on management and first‐line treatment by the German CLL Study Group (GCLLSG)

The management of patients with CLL is undergoing significant changes; during the last decade, the outcome of first‐line therapies has been markedly improved with the addition of anti‐CD20 antibodies to chemotherapy. Today, chemoimmunotherapy for physically fit patients ≤65 years should consist of fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab (FCR). The combination of bendamustine and rituximab (BR) should be considered in physically fit patients >65 years and in patients with a higher risk of infections. Patients with reduced fitness and/or relevant comorbidity should receive chlorambucil with a CD20 antibody, preferably obinutuzumab. Regardless of their fitness, patients with CLL carrying genetic aberrations such as del(17p) and/or TP53 mutation poorly respond to chemoimmunotherapy and therefore require different therapeutic approaches. An increasing understanding of the disease biology has led to the development of targeted drugs for the treatment of CLL, such as the BTK inhibitor ibrutinib and PI3K inhibitor idelalisib. These agents have shown efficacy in high‐risk and relapsed/refractory patients and are currently being evaluated in clinical trials for first‐line therapy. It is anticipated that these compounds and further other novel agents will profoundly change the therapy of CLL.     

Follicular lymphoma: emerging therapeutic strategies

Follicular lymphoma is a diverse disease, both biologically and clinically. Patients may present with indolent, asymptomatic disease or more aggressive, symptomatic disease with high tumor burden. Decision-making to treat in the frontline is based on histology, disease burden and patient symptoms. The general approach should be a combination of rituximab and chemotherapy, traditionally using alkylating agents, with or without an anthracycline, with more recent evidence for the alternative of bendamustine. Relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma carries similar variability in presentation. Therapeutic options include the same regimens traditionally used for first-line therapy; however, they also include agents, such as bendamustine, bortezomib, lenalidomide and anti-CD20 agents (rituximab, ofatumumab and radioimmunotherapy). Finally, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (both autologous and allogeneic) remains a useful treatment strategy, although the optimal timing of such approaches requires further clarification.     

Safety and efficacy of 90Yttrium‐Ibritumomab‐Tiuxetan for untreated follicular lymphoma patients. An Italian cooperative study

⁹⁰Yttrium (⁹⁰Y)‐Ibritumomab‐Tiuxetan combines the targeting advantage of a monoclonal antibody with the radiosensitivity of Follicular Lymphoma (FL). Previous studies showed that 90Y‐IT is safe and effective in relapsed/refractory indolent FL, irrespective of prior treatment with rituximab. This multicentre trial aimed to evaluate the safety and the efficacy of “upfront” single‐agent (⁹⁰Y)‐Ibritumomab‐Tiuxetan in advanced‐stage FL. The primary objective was the incidence of responses in terms of complete (CR) and partial remission (PR). Fifty patients with stage II “bulky”, III or IV FL received a single treatment course with (⁹⁰Y)‐Ibritumomab‐Tiuxetan as initial therapy. The median age was 60 years. Bone marrow involvement (<25%) was observed in 24 patients (48%) and 7 (14%) had an elevated lactate dehydrogenase level. The overall response (ORR) and CR rates were 94% and 86%, respectively with a median follow‐up of 38·8 months. The median progression‐free survival (PFS) was not reached, whereas the 3‐year estimated PFS and overall survival (OS) rate was 63·4% and 90%, respectively. Grade 3/4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 30% and 26% of patients respectively; none experienced grade 3/4 non‐haematological toxicity. No cases of secondary haematological malignancies were observed. (⁹⁰Y)‐Ibritumomab‐Tiuxetan was demonstrated to be highly effective and safe as first‐line treatment for advanced‐stage FL.     

Chemotherapy combinations with monoclonal antibodies in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

Although the use of monoclonal antibodies as single agents has had a tremendous impact on the care of patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL), the greatest benefit has been generated by the addition of monoclonal antibodies to conventional cytotoxic chemotherapy. Rituximab is the monoclonal antibody responsible for all clinical improvement noted to date. The addition of rituximab to cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) chemotherapy (R-CHOP regimen) improves the response rate, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Adding rituximab to CHOP chemotherapy improves response rates and PFS in mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). Finally, the addition of rituximab to a variety of chemotherapy regimens improves the response rates, PFS, and OS in follicular lymphoma (FL). Several other (epratuzumab, bevacizumab, alemtuzumab) monoclonal antibody-chemotherapy combinations are currently under study in NHL. This review will summarize the data supporting the addition of rituximab to chemotherapy in NHL and discuss preliminary data regarding the use of other monoclonal antibodies in combination with chemotherapy.     

Follicular lymphoma: 2012 update on diagnosis and management

Disease overview: Follicular lymphoma (FL) is generally an indolent B‐cell lymphoproliferative disorder of transformed follicular center B cells. FL is characterized by diffuse lymphoadenopathy, involvement of bone marrow, splenomegaly, and less commonly other extranodal sites of involvement. In general, cytopenias can occur but constitutional symptoms of fever, nightsweats, and weight loss are uncommon. Diagnosis: Diagnosis is based on histology of preferably a biopsy of a lymph node. Immunohistochemical staining is positive in virtually all cases for cell surface CD19, CD20, CD10, and monoclonal immunoglobulin, as well as cytoplasmic expression of bcl‐2 protein. The overwhelming majority of cases have the characteristic t(14;18) translocation involving the IgH/bcl‐2 genes. Risk stratification: The FL International Prognostic Index prognostic model for FL uses five independent predictors of inferior survival: age > 60 years, hemoglobin < 12 g/dL, serum lactate dehydrogenase > normal, Ann Arbor stage III/IV, number of involved nodal areas > 4. The presence of 0, 1, 2, and ≥ 3 adverse factors defines low, intermediate, and high‐risk disease with median 10‐year survivals in the pre‐rituximab era of ～71, 51, and 36 months, respectively. With the use of more modern therapies, specifically anti‐CD20 monoclonal antibody, the outcome has improved. Risk‐adapted therapy: Observation continues to be adequate for asymptomatic patients with low bulk disease and no cytopenias. For patients needing therapy, most patients are treated with chemotherapy plus rituximab, which has improved response rates, duration of response, and overall survival. Randomized studies have shown additional benefit for maintenance rituximab both following chemotherapy‐rituximab and single‐agent rituximab. Autologous stem cell transplantation (SCT) has not shown a survival benefit in first remission patients. SCT including both autologous and allogeneic SCT or experimental agent therapy is considered for recurrent disease. Am. J. Hematol. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Follicular lymphoma: 2015 update on diagnosis and management

Disease overview : Follicular lymphoma is generally an indolent B cell lymphoproliferative disorder of transformed follicular center B cells. Follicular lymphoma (FL) is characterized by diffuse lymphoadenopathy, bone marrow involvement, splenomegaly, and less commonly other extranodal sites of involvement. In general, cytopenias can occur but constitutional symptoms of fever, night sweats, and weight loss are uncommon. Diagnosis : Diagnosis is based on histology of preferably a biopsy of a lymph node. Immunohistochemical staining is positive in virtually all cases for cell surface CD19, CD20, CD10, and monoclonal immunoglobulin, as well as cytoplasmic expression of bcl‐2 protein. The overwhelming majority of cases have the characteristic t(14;18) translocation involving the IgH/bcl‐2 genes. Risk stratification : The Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index prognostic model for FL uses five independent predictors of inferior survival: age >60 years, hemoglobin <12 g/dL, serum LDH > normal, Ann Arbor stage III/IV, number of involved nodal areas > 4. The presence of 0, 1, 2, and ≥ 3 adverse factors defines low, intermediate, and high‐risk disease. With the use of more modern therapies, outcomes have improved. Risk‐adapted therapy : Observation continues to be adequate for asymptomatic patients with low bulk disease and no cytopenias, with no survival advantage for early treatment with either chemotherapy or rituximab alone. For patients needing therapy, most patients are treated with chemotherapy plus rituximab, which has improved response rates, duration of response and overall survival. Randomized studies have shown additional benefit for maintenance rituximab both following chemotherapy‐rituximab and single agent rituximab. Experimental therapies as well as stem cell transplantation (SCT) are considered for recurrent disease. Am. J. Hematol. 90:1172–1178, 2015. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Evolving treatment strategies in mantle cell lymphoma

Mantle cell lymphoma is an incurable, moderately aggressive B cell lymphoma. While a small proportion of patients with indolent disease can be managed expectantly, most patients require treatment. The therapeutic approach is driven by physician recommendation, patient choice, age, fitness and comorbidities. Young, fit patients often receive combination chemoimmunotherapy, including high dose cytarabine, with autologous stem cell transplant. Recent data has indicated benefit from maintenance rituximab following autologous stem cell transplant. Ongoing trials are investigating combinations of chemotherapy and targeted agents as well as the role of minimal residual disease guided therapy. Older, less fit patients often receive bendamustine and rituximab or anthracycline based regimens. Maintenance rituximab is typically administered in older MCL patients after anthracycline based chemotherapy although its use after bendamustine based therapy is not supported by current data. Current trials focus on refining this regimen with the addition of targeted agents. In the relapsed and refractory setting, novel agents have demonstrated activity although durability of responses remains unsatisfactory.     

The use of anthracycline at first‐line compared to alkylating agents or nucleoside analogs improves the outcome of salvage treatments after relapse in follicular lymphoma The REFOLL study by the Fondazione Italiana Linfomi

Follicular lymphoma (FL) patients experience multiple remissions and relapses and commonly receive multiple treatment lines. A crucial question is whether anthracyclines should be used at first‐line or whether they would be better “reserved” for relapse and whether FL outcome can be optimized by definite sequences of treatments. Randomized trials can be hardly designed to address this question. In this retrospective multi‐institutional study, time‐to‐next‐treatment after first relapse was analyzed in 510 patients who had received either alkylating agents‐ or anthracycline‐ or nucleoside analogs‐based chemotherapy with/without rituximab at first‐line and different second‐line therapies. After a median of 42 months, median time‐to‐next‐treatment after relapse was 41 months (CI95%:34–47 months). After adjustment for covariates, first‐line anthracycline‐based chemotherapy with/without rituximab was associated with better time‐to‐next‐treatment after any salvage than alkylating agents‐based chemotherapy with/without rituximab or nucleoside analogs‐based chemotherapy with/without rituximab (HR:0.74, P = 0.027). The addition of rituximab to first‐line chemotherapy had no significant impact (HR:1.22, P = 0.140). Autologs stem cell transplantation performed better than any other salvage treatment (HR:0.53, P < 0.001). First‐line anthracycline‐based chemotherapy significantly improved time‐to‐next‐treatment even in patients receiving salvage autologs stem cell transplantation (P = 0.041). This study supports the concept that in FL previous treatments significantly impact on the outcome of subsequent therapies. The outcome of second‐line treatments, either with salvage chemoimmunotherapy or with autologs stem cell transplantation, was better when an anthracycline‐containing regimen was used at first‐line. Am. J. Hematol. 90:56–61, 2015. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Response and survival for primary therapy combination regimens and maintenance rituximab in Waldenström macroglobulinaemia

Waldenström macroglobulinaemia (WM) is a rare and incurable lymphoma. Comparative studies evaluating the efficacy of primary therapy in symptomatic WM patients have not been performed. In this study, we compared response and survival outcomes in WM patients who received primary therapy with cyclophosphamide‐dexamethasone‐rituximab (CDR), bortezomib‐dexamethasone‐rituximab (BDR) and bendamustine‐rituximab (Benda‐R), as well as maintenance rituximab following primary therapy. Analyses were adjusted for relevant clinical factors associated with response and survival. Maintenance rituximab was analysed as a time‐varying covariate. Our study included 182 patients, of which 57 (31%) received Benda‐R, 87 (48%) BDR and 38 (21%) CDR; 116 (64%) received maintenance rituximab. The median time to best response was shorter for Benda‐R and BDR than CDR (18, 20 and 30 months, respectively). Benda‐R and BDR were associated with better median progression‐free survival (PFS) than CDR (5·5, 5·8 and 4·8 years, respectively), and better 10‐year overall survival rates (OS; 95%, 96% and 81%, respectively). Maintenance rituximab was associated with higher rates of major response (97% vs. 68%), and better median PFS (6·8 years vs. 2·8 years) and 10‐year OS rate (84% vs. 66%) when compared to not receiving maintenance. Benda‐R, BDR and maintenance rituximab associate with higher response rates and longer survival in WM patients than CDR and no maintenance, respectively.     

Favorable outcome with doxorubicin‐based chemotherapy and radiotherapy for adult patients with early stage primary systemic anaplastic large‐cell lymphoma

The aim of this study was to analyze outcomes in adult patients with early stage systemic anaplastic large‐cell lymphoma (ALCL) treated with doxorubicin‐based chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Forty‐six adult patients with early stage systemic ALCL received chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy. All patients except two received chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) or a CHOP‐like regimen. Twenty patients had stage I disease, and 26 patients had stage II disease. The 5‐yr overall survival (OS), progression‐free survival (PFS), and local control rates for all patients were 84.4%, 63.6%, and 90.8%, respectively. The 5‐yr OS and PFS rates were 95.0% and 77.4% for Ann Arbor stage I disease, and 75.1% and 51.7% for stage II disease, respectively. Lymph node involvement was the main pattern of disease progression or relapse for these patients. Adult patients with early stage systemic ALCL treated with doxorubicin‐based chemotherapy and radiotherapy had a favorable prognosis.     

Mantle cell lymphoma

MCL is a well-characterized clinically aggressive lymphoma with a poor prognosis. Recent research findings have slightly improved the outcome of this neoplasm. The addition of rituximab to conventional chemotherapy has increased overall response rates, but it does not improve overall survival with respect to chemotherapy alone. The use of intensive frontline therapies including rituximab and consolidated by ASCT ameliorates response rate and prolongs progression-free survival, but any impact on survival remains to be proven. Furthermore, the optimal timing, cytoreductive regimen and conditioning regimen, and the clinical implications of achieving a disease remission even at molecular level remain to be elucidated. The development of targeted therapies as the consequence of better dissection of pathogenetic pathways in MCL might improve the outcome of conventional chemotherapy in most patients and spare the toxicity of intense therapy in a minority of MCL patients characterized by a relatively indolent disease. Patients not eligible for intensive regimens, such as hyperC-VAD, may be considered for less demanding therapies, such as the combination of rituximab either with CHOP or with purine analogues, or bendamustine. Allogeneic SCT can be an effective option for relapsed disease in patients who are fit enough and have a compatible donor. Maintenance rituximab may be considered after response to immunochemotherapy for relapsed disease, although there are currently no data to recommend this approach as the first-line strategy. As the optimal approach to the management of MCL is still evolving, it is critical that these patients be enrolled in clinical trials to identify better treatment options.     

Prognostic roles of absolute monocyte and absolute lymphocyte counts in patients with advanced‐stage follicular lymphoma in the rituximab era: an analysis from the FOLL05 trial of the Fondazione Italiana Linfomi

Recently, in an attempt to improve the discrimination power of the international prognostic index (IPI), patients with diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma were evaluated to determine the prognostic roles of peripheral blood absolute monocyte count (AMC) and absolute lymphocyte count (ALC). Here, we analysed data of 428 patients with follicular lymphoma (FL) enrolled in a prospective, randomized trial (FOLL05 study) conducted by Fondazione Italiana Linfomi, to assess the impact of AMC and ALC on progression‐free survival (PFS). All patients had been treated with one of three treatment combinations: (i) rituximab (R) plus cyclophosphamide, vincristine and prednisone; (ii) R plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone or (iii) R plus mitoxantrone and fludarabine. We showed that only AMC was a powerful predictor of PFS, and possibly overall survival, in patients with FL treated with combination chemotherapy regimens that contained R. The AMC can be used alone as a novel, simple factor that can predict survival outcome in patients with FL, independent of the immunochemotherapy regimen. It may therefore be widely used by clinicians, due to its simplicity and broad applicability. Additionally, it can be combined with other factors that determine the IPI or FLIPI, to increase the discriminating ability of these indices.     

Phase Ib trial of the PI3K/mTOR inhibitor voxtalisib (SAR245409) in combination with chemoimmunotherapy in patients with relapsed or refractory B‐cell malignancies

This phase Ib, dose‐escalation study investigated the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), recommended phase II dose (RP2D), safety, pharmacokinetics (PK) and preliminary efficacy of the pan‐class I phosphoinositide 3‐kinase (PI3K) and mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor voxtalisib [30 or 50 mg twice daily (BID)], in combination with rituximab (voxtalisib+rituximab) or rituximab plus bendamustine (voxtalisib+rituximab+bendamustine), in relapsed or refractory indolent B‐cell non‐Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), mantle cell lymphoma and chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL). MTD and RP2D of voxtalisib were determined using a 3 + 3 dose‐escalation design. Adverse events (AEs), plasma PK and disease response were recorded. Thirty‐seven patients were enrolled. The RP2D of voxtalisib in combination with rituximab or rituximab+bendamustine was 50 mg BID. Four patients experienced a total of five dose‐limiting toxicities. The most frequent AEs were nausea (45·9%), fatigue (37·8%) headache (32·4%) and pyrexia (32·4%). The most frequent grade ≥3 AEs were neutropenia (27·0%), thrombocytopenia (24·3%), anaemia (16·2%) and febrile neutropenia (10·8%). Voxtalisib PK parameters were not affected by co‐administration with rituximab or rituximab+bendamustine. Of 35 efficacy‐evaluable patients, four (11·4%) achieved complete response and 13 (37·1%) achieved partial response. Voxtalisib, in combination with rituximab or rituximab+bendamustine, demonstrated an acceptable safety profile and encouraging anti‐tumour activity in relapsed or refractory B‐cell malignancies.     

Bendamustine combined with rituximab for patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B cell lymphoma

Patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) are treated with salvage regimens and may be considered for high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation if disease is chemosensitive. Bendamustine is active in indolent B cell lymphomas and chronic lymphocytic leukemia but has not been extensively studied in aggressive lymphomas. This trial examines the combination of bendamustine and rituximab in patients with relapsed and refractory DLBCL. Patients received bendamustine at 90 mg/m² (n?=?2) or 120 mg/m² (n?=?57) on days 1 and 2 and rituximab at 375 mg/m² on day 1 every 28 days for up to 6 cycles. The study evaluated objective response rate (ORR), duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), and treatment safety. Fifty-nine patients were treated, and 48 were evaluable for response. Median age was 74; 89 % had stage III or IV disease, and 63 % had high revised International Prognostic Index scores; the median number of prior therapies was 1. Based on analysis using the intent-to-treat population, the ORR was 45.8 % (complete response, 15.3 %; partial response, 30.5 %). The median DOR was 17.3 months, and the median PFS was 3.6 months. Grade 3 or 4 hematological toxicities included neutropenia (36 %), leukopenia (29 %), thrombocytopenia (22 %), and anemia (12 %). The combination of bendamustine and rituximab showed modest activity in patients with relapsed and refractory DLBCL and has an acceptable toxicity profile.     

Long‐term outcomes,secondary malignancies and stem cell collection following bendamustine in patients with previously treated non‐Hodgkin lymphoma

Despite the long history of bendamustine as treatment for indolent non‐Hodgkin lymphoma, long‐term efficacy and toxicity data are minimal. We reviewed long‐term data from three clinical trials to characterize the toxicity and efficacy of patients receiving bendamustine. Data were available for 149 subjects at 21 sites. The median age was 60 years at the start of bendamustine (range 39–84), and patients had received a median of 3 prior therapies. The histologies included grades 1–2 follicular lymphoma (FL; n = 73), grade 3 FL (n = 23), small lymphocytic lymphoma (n = 20), marginal zone lymphoma (n = 15), mantle cell lymphoma (n = 9), transformed lymphomas (n = 5), lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma (n = 2) and not reported (n = 2). The median event‐free survival was 14·1 months. Nine of 12 attempted stem cell collections were successful. With a median follow‐up of 8·9 years, 23 patients developed 25 cancers, including 8 patients with myelodysplastic syndrome/acute myeloid leukaemia. These data provide important information regarding the long‐term toxicity of bendamustine in previously treated patients. A small but meaningful number of patients achieved durable remissions following bendamustine. These rigorously collected, patient‐level, long‐term follow‐up data provide reassurance that bendamustine or bendamustine plus rituximab is associated with efficacy and safety for patients with relapsed or refractory indolent non‐Hodgkin lymphoma.