Rifabutin-based triple therapy after failure of Helicobacter pylori eradication treatment: preliminary experience

Despite continuous improvement of Helicobacter pylori (Hp) eradication therapy, new treatment regimens are necessary if established first-line treatments fail. In the present pilot study, a recently described rifabutin-based triple therapy was evaluated after preceding failure of triple therapy. Rifabutin (150 mg), amoxicillin (1 g), and lansoprazole (30 mg) were administered twice daily for 1 week to 25 patients infected with Hp who had previously failed to respond to eradication treatment and/or who had developed resistance to macrolides and nitroimidazoles. Four patients were lost to follow-up. Eradication rate of rifabutin-based triple therapy was 86% (18/21; per protocol) and 72% (18/25; intention-to-treat). Side effects were minimal. It is concluded that this new drug combination is an effective therapy for Hp strains resistant to clarithromycin or metronidazole; however, rifabutin-based treatment regimens for Hp eradication should be restricted to patients infected with resistant strains.     

Rifabutin-Based Triple Therapy Or Bismuth-Based Quadruple Regimen As Rescue Therapies For Helicobacter pylori Infection

Background/AimsH. pylori treatment remains a challenge for clinicians, and a definite quote of patients require two or more treatments. We evaluated the efficacy of rifabutin-based therapy and Pylera® regimen as rescue therapies.MethodsBetween January 2016 and December 2019, dyspeptic patients with at least one therapeutic failure observed in clinical practice received either a 12-day rifabutin-based triple therapy (esomeprazole 40 mg and amoxicillin 1 g, both twice daily, and rifabutin 150 mg once daily) or 10-day quadruple therapy with Pylera® (three in one capsule containing 140 mg bismuth subcitrate potassium, 125 mg metronidazole and 125 mg tetracycline). The eradication rates according to previous number of eradication failure therapies were calculated. The role antibiotic resistance pattern in H. pylori isolates was also investigated.ResultsData of 423 patients were available. A total of 270 patients were treated with rifabutin-based therapy, and the overall eradication rate was 61.9%. Pylera® therapy was administered to 153 patients and the cure rate was 88.3%. According to the number of previous therapeutic failures, the eradication rate for the rifabutin-based therapy was 68.3% as second-line and further decreased to 63.1% in fourth-line therapy. Following Pylera® regimen, the cure rate was 94.8% in second-line, and remained 89.6% in fourth-line therapy. Efficacy of rifabutin-based and Pylera® therapies significantly decreased when clarithromycin and levofloxacin resistance, respectively, were present.ConclusionsOur data documented a decreasing trend for rifabutin-based therapy efficacy according to previous therapy failures, whilst this did not occur for Pylera®.     

Rifabutin based triple therapy for eradication of H. pylori primary and secondary resistant to tinidazole and clarithromycin

BACKGROUND: Rifabutin has been empirically used in Helicobacter pylori infections resistant to triple therapy. There are no data on primary and secondary resistance to rifabutin and its use in specific cases. AIM: To analyse the susceptibility and resistance to rifabutin in H. pylori-positive patients with or without previous H. pylori therapy and to test the efficacy of rifabutin in H. pylori resistant to clarithromycin and tinidazole. METHODS: Four hundred and twenty H. pylori-positive patients without previous exposure to triple therapy and 104 patients who had already received one course of triple therapy underwent upper endoscopy for dyspeptic symptoms and H. pylori susceptibility test. Amoxicillin, clarithromycin, tinidazole and rifabutin were evaluated for resistance and susceptibility. Forty patients with primary resistance to both clarithromycin and tinidazole and with susceptibility to amoxicillin and rifabutin, and 65 patients with secondary resistance and susceptibility to the same antibiotics were identified. All these patients received a 10-day triple therapy with pantoprazole amoxicillin and rifabutin. Treatment success was evaluated by the 13C-Urea Breath test. RESULTS: In naive patients 23% of strains were resistant to clarythromycin, 35% to tinidazole, 9% to both antibiotics, and none was resistant to rifabutin In patients already treated the percentages of resistant strains were 76, 64.4, 62.5 and 1%, respectively. With rifabutin based triple therapy eradication rates were (Per Protocol and Intention-to-Treat analysis) 100 and 87.5% in primary resistance to clarithromycin and tinidazole and 82.2 and 78.5% in secondary resistance. CONCLUSION: H. pylori primary and secondary resistances to clarithromycin and tinidazole are high in our geographic area, while resistance to rifabutin is rare. Rifabutin-based triple therapy, can be successfully used in primary and secondary resistance to clarithromycin and tinidazole according to the in vitro susceptibility test.     

Treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection]

Significant progress and new insights have been gained since Helicobacter pylori was found in 1982. Even with currently most effective treatment regimen, about 10-20% of patients will fail to obtain the eradication of H. pylori infection. This review will focus on the empirical treatment for H. pylori infection in Korea. Seven days triple therapy (proton pump inhibitor, amoxicillin and clarithromycin) has been the main first line therapy for H. pylori infection in Korea after the recommendation by Korean H. pylori study group in 1998. Such triple therapy has been the effective regimen for eradication of H. pylori infection. However, the efficacy of 7 days proton pump inhibitor-amoxicillin-clarithromycin therapy becomes lower and various eradication rates probably reflects the increase in antimicrobial resistance, recently. The recent multi-center prospective randomized study and meta-analysis showed 14 days proton pump inhibitor-amoxicillin-clarithromycin therapy is more effective than 7 days or 10 days therapy. In the case of failure, quadruple therapy (proton pump inhibitor, a bismuth salt, metronidazole and tetracycline) is a very effective second-line regimen. After the failure of two or more eradication treatments, bacterial resistance to antibiotics should be evaluated and the regimen of third-line therapy should be selected according to each antimicrobial susceptibility. The empirical third-line therapies, recommended in the cases that antimicrobial susceptibility test is unavailable, are unclear of its validity at present in Korea. The triple therapies including rifabutin, moxifloxacin, or levofloxacin or dual therapy including high dose proton pump inhibitor and amoxicillin are needed to be proven as possible candidates for the empirical third-line therapy. Multiple eradication failures should be handled on a case-by-case basis by specialists.     

Efficacy of rifabutin-based triple therapy in Helicobacter pylori infected patients after two standard treatments

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Even with the current most effective treatment regimens for Helicobacter pylori infection, a considerable number of patients will be resistant to eradication. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the H. pylori eradication rate in patients resistant to standard therapies when treated with a triple therapy of pantoprazole, rifabutin and amoxicillin. METHODS: Ninety-two consecutive patients diagnosed with H. pylori infection resistant to two previous treatment regimens were treated with pantoprazole, rifabutin and amoxicillin for 10 days. The persistence or eradication of H. pylori was determined by a 13C-urea breath test performed 4 weeks after the treatment. RESULTS: Per protocol eradication was achieved in 62.2% of patients and the intention-to-treat eradication was 60.8%. Only two patients were excluded for adverse events related to the treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The eradication rate is acceptable as a third-line therapy, particularly in centers with high cure rate for first line therapy. Another important value of this study is the good tolerance for the treatment observed in our patients. It is possible that rifabutin-based triple therapy may be of use in hospital centers that do not have disposable culture and susceptibility methods against H. pylori.     

Strategien der Helicobacter-pylori-Eradikation

Standard first-line triple therapies consisting of PPI/RBC and two antibiotics (clarithromycin, amoxicillin or metronidazole) reach eradication rates of over 80%. However, Helicobacter pylori can develop resistance to antibiotics and after treatment failure resistance has to be considered. Therefore, for second-line therapy antibiotics should be exchanged or rescue antibiotics like fluoro-chinolones or rifabutin should be selected. Key factors for treatment outcome are antibiotic resistance, duration of therapy and compliance.     

幽门螺杆菌根除方案和影响因素

随着抗菌药物耐药性的不断上升,经典三联疗法对幽门螺杆菌（Hp）的根除率明显降低。近年出现的新治疗策略可替代三联疗法作为一线疗法,包括序贯疗法、含铋剂的四联疗法、伴同疗法、混合疗法等,以左氧氟沙星、利福布丁和呋喃唑酮为基础的疗法可作为补救治疗。此外,中药和益生菌亦可作为补充治疗。考虑到Hp的耐药性、CYP2C19基因表型、吸烟等诸多因素对根除效果的影响,临床医师应根据具体情况选择合理的治疗方案。本文就近年Hp根除治疗方案和影响因素作一综述。     

Treatment of Helicobacter pylori

Triple therapy, consisting of two antibiotics, clarithomycin and amoxicillin or metronidazole in combination with a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) has become the first-line option for infection with Helicobacter pylori and has been recommended at several consensus conferences. In clinical practice, approximately 20% of patients will fail to obtain H. pylori eradication with the recommended treatment regimens. Major causes of treatment failure are insufficient patient compliance and antibiotic resistance. Because of antibiotic resistance, bismuth-based quadruple therapy has also become a first-line regimen in areas with exceedingly high rates of clarithromycin and metronidazole resistance, and is the preferred second-line option otherwise. Triple therapies based on levofloxacin and/or rifabutin mainly with combination of amoxicillin are options if multiple eradication failure occurs. However, following therapy failure beyond a second treatment attempt requires antibiotic resistance testing. New drugs and adjuvant agents have been reported but their efficacy needs further evaluation.     

Efficacy of rifabutin-based triple therapy as second-line treatment to eradicate helicobacter pylori infection

Background

Rifabutin has been found to be effective in multi-resistant patients after various treatment cycles for Helicobacter pylori (HP) infection, but it has not been analysed as a second-line treatment. Therefore, we seek to compare the effectiveness of a treatment regimen including rifabutin versus conventional quadruple therapy (QT).

Methods

Open clinical trial, randomised and multi-centre, of two treatment protocols: A) Conventional regime -QT- (omeprazole 20 mg bid, bismuth citrate 120 mg qid, tetracycline 500 mg qid and metronidazole 500 mg tid); B) Experimental one -OAR- (omeprazole 20 mg bid, amoxicillin 1 gr bid, and rifabutin 150 mg bid), both taken orally for 7 days, in patients with HP infection for whom first-line treatment had failed. Eradication was determined by Urea Breath Test (UBT). Safety was determined by the adverse events.

Results

99 patients were randomised, QT, n = 54; OAR, n = 45. The two groups were homogeneous. In 8 cases, treatment was suspended (6 in QT and 2 in OAR). The eradication achieved, analysed by ITT, was for QT, 38 cases (70.4%), and for OAR, 20 cases (44.4%); p = 0.009, OR = 1.58. Of the cases analysed PP, QT were 77.1%; OAR, 46.5%; p = 0.002. Adverse effects were described in 64% of the QT patients and in 44% of the OAR patients (p = 0.04).

Conclusion

A 7-day rifabutin-based triple therapy associated to amoxicillin and omeprazole at standard dose was not found to be effective as a second-line rescue therapy. The problem with quadruple therapy lies in the adverse side effects it provokes. We believe the search should continue for alternatives that are more comfortably administered and that are at least as effective, but with fewer adverse side effects.

Trial Registration

Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN81058036     

'Rescue' therapies for the management of Helicobacter pylori infection

Helicobacter pylori infection is the main cause of gastritis, gastroduodenal ulcer and gastric cancer and should be considered as a major public health issue. According to several international guidelines, first-line therapy for treating H. pylori infection consists of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) or ranitidine bismuth citrate (RBC) with any two antibiotics of amoxicillin, clarithromycin or metronidazole given for 7-14 days. However, even with the recommended treatment regimens, approximately 20% of patients will fail to obtain H. pylori eradication. The proportion of patients with first-line H. pylori therapy failure may be higher in clinical practice and it may increase thanks to diffusion of H. pylori treatment. The recommended second-line therapy is the quadruple regimen composed by tetracycline, metronidazole, bismuth salts and a PPI. However, the efficacy of this regimen is limited by poor patient's compliance due to its side effects, number of tablets per day, and long duration. Moreover, bismuth and metronidazole are not available in all countries. Alternatively, a longer-lasting (i.e. 10-14 days) PPI or RBC triple therapy with two antibiotics has generally been used. In an empirical strategy, the choice of second line depends on the treatment initially used. If a clarithromycin-based regimen was administered in first line, a quadruple regimen or PPI (or RBC) triple therapy with metronidazole and amoxicillin (or tetracycline) should be suggested as a second line. In case of second-line treatment failure, the patient should be evaluated by a case-by-case approach. A susceptibility-guided strategy, if available, is recommended in order to choose the best third-line treatment. Culture can reveal the presence of H. pylori-sensitive strains to clarithromycin (the best effective) or other antimicrobials (such as amoxicillin, metronidazole and tetracycline). Conversely, in an empirical strategy, a third-line not yet used therapy, can reach a high success rate. PPI or RBC, amoxicillin and a new antimicrobial (e.g. rifabutin, levofloxacin or furazolidone) could be used. Several studies have obtained relatively good results with triple therapy combining PPI, rifabutin, and amoxicillin, although a reversible myelotoxicity as leukopenia and thrombocytopenia has been described. Preliminary good results were also achieved with triples PPI regimens combining levofloxacin and amoxicillin without important adverse effects. Furazolidone has also shown efficacy for H. pylori eradication, although untoward reactions could limit its use, especially when high doses are employed. Finally, in more than one H. pylori treatment failure, non-antimicrobial add-on medications (such as lactoferrin, probiotics and others) could be used with the aim either to improve the eradication rate or to minimize side effects.     

How to proceed in Helicobacter pylori-positive chronic gastritis refractory to first- and second-line eradication therapy

Helicobacter pylori is a widespread disease causing most of the peptic ulcer diseases and low-grade mucosa-associated lymphoreticular tissue (MALT) lymphoma. Moreover, H. pylori is a proven environmental risk factor for gastric carcinoma and it has been recognized as a type 1 carcinogen factor. A combination of drugs has been proposed, using a proton pump inhibitor (PPI), amoxicillin, clarithromycin, metronidazole and tetracycline to treat the infection. Since 1996, according to the European guidelines, the first-line approach using PPI, amoxicillin and clarithromycin or metronidazole has been suggested. Seven days of quadruple therapy with PPI (or ranitidine), tetracycline, bismuth salts and metronidazole has been reserved as second-line treatment. To improve the eradication rate of the triple therapy, a different combination of the available antibiotics has been proposed, consisting of a 10-day sequential regimen. A second-line levofloxacin-amoxicillin-based triple therapy given for 10 days has been proposed, obtaining a high eradication rate, suggesting this regimen to be a suitable retreatment option in eradication failure. A third-line treatment with rifabutin-based regimen has been proposed.     

Optimal treatment strategy for Helicobacter pylori:Era of antibiotic resistance

Standard triple therapy,consisting of a proton pump inhibitor,plus amoxicillin and clarithromycin,has been the most commonly used first-line treatment regimen for Helicobacter pylori(H.pylori)eradication for many years worldwide.However,as a result of increased resistance to antibiotics,H.pylori eradication rates with use of standard triple therapy have been declining and recently reached<80%in many countries.Several new strategies to enhance the eradication rate of H.pylori have been studied.Currently,among the alternative first-line eradication regimens,concomitant and hybrid regimens have shown excellent results and could be the optimal treatment option.Although clinical usefulness of rescue therapy for patients in whom eradication of H.pylori with non-bismuth quadruple regimen has failed is unclear,levofloxacin-based quadruple therapy has shown promise as a rescue treatment.The choice of third-line therapy depends on factors such as the local pattern of antibiotic resistance,drug availability,and previous treatment.We hope that a simple method for detection of antibiotic susceptibility using polymerase chain reaction would be a possible alternative to administration of"tailored treatment"in the era of increasing prevalence of antimicrobial resistance.     

Cost-Effectiveness of Treatment Regimens for the Eradication of Helicobacter pylori in Duodenal Ulcer

Background: Eradication of Helicobacter pylori with antimicrobials was recommended by a recent NIH consensus panel for all infected patients with peptic ulcer disease. The precise regimen that should be used for eradication of the infection remains uncertain because of the variety of regimens described, variable results with the regimens, and difficulties in predicting drug compliance outside clinical trials. Methods: A decision analysis tree was developed with three regimens that are widely used regimens for the eradication of H. pylori: 1 ) 2-wk triple drug therapy (metronidazole, bismuth, tetracycline with H2 receptor antagonist), 2) 2-wk omeprazole and amoxicillin, and 3) 2-wk omeprazole and clarithromycin. Traditional H2 receptor antagonist therapy was used for comparison. A 2-yr time period was chosen for study to allow sufficient time for relapse and to evaluate its effect on the treatment strategy. Probabilities for eradication, compliance, and metronidazole resistance were determined from published data, and assumptions were tested by sensitivity analysis. Results: Standard 2-wk triple drug therapy was the least expensive strategy ($720), and conventional H2 receptor antagonist therapy was the most expensive ($1791). Costs with 2-wk therapy with omeprazole and clarithromycin ($768) were lower than with omeprazole and amoxicillin ($1028). Conclusions. Treatment to eradicate H. pylori in infected patients with duodenal ulcer is a less expensive strategy than traditional therapy with H2 receptor antagonists. Triple drug therapy is the optimal regimen in areas where metronidazole resistance rates are <36% and compliance is >53%. Omeprazole and amoxicillin is not cost-effective unless eradication rates are greater than 74%. Dual drug therapy with omeprazole and clarithromycin is effective in regions where metronidazole resistance is high or where it is anticipated that there would be poor compliance with the more complicated triple drug therapy regimen.     

Meta-Analysis of the Efficacy of Antibiotic Therapy in Eradicating Helicobacter pylori

Despite numerous Helicobacter pylori treatment studies, the optimum regimen(s) for its eradication remain unclear. Our objective was to determine systematically which regimen(s) gave the best pooled eradication rates, by using meta-analysis methodology. A total of 27 studies were identified. Pooled eradication rates for single (18.6%), double (48.2%), and triple therapy (82.3%) were statistically highly different (p < 0.0005). Eradication rates with amoxicillin (23.0%) and bismuth compounds (19.6%) were equivalent. Combined treatment with bismuth+metronidazole was better than bismuth+amoxicillin (55.1% vs. 43.7%, p = 0.049). Triple therapy with bismuth+metronidazole+tetracycline gave a statistically higher eradication rate (94.1%) than bismuth+metronidazole+amoxicillin (73.1%, p < 0.0005). Despite increased side effects with multiple antibiotic regimens, patients tolerated these well, without significant drop-out. The combination of bismuth, metronidazole, and tetracycline gives the best eradication rate, but the optimal doses and duration of treatment have yet to be determined. Further studies are necessary to explore factors such as antibiotic resistance and drug compliance as important factors affecting antibiotic efficacy.     

Eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection

Eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection has become an important issue recently, because this bacterial species cluster can cause many gastrointestinal diseases. Elevated antibiotic resistance is related to an increasing failure rate of H. pylori eradication. Standard triple therapy is still the first-line therapy; however, according to the Maastricht IV Consensus Report, it should be abandoned in areas of high clarithromycin resistance. Alternative first-line therapies include bismuth-containing quadruple therapy, sequential, concomitant, and hybrid therapies. Quinolone-based triple therapy may be considered as first-line therapy in areas of clarithromycin resistance >15–20% and quinolone resistance <10%. Unique second-line therapy is still unclear, and bismuth-containing quadruple therapy or levofloxacin-based triple therapy can be used as rescue treatment. Third-line therapy should be under culture guidance to select the most effective regimens (such as levofloxacin-based, rifabutin-based, or furazolidone-based therapies). Antibiotics resistance, patient compliance, and CYP 2C19 genotypes could influence the outcome. Clinicians should use antibiotics according to local reports.     

Will H. pylori stagger under the weight of this LOAD? A novel but expensive eradication regimen

In the era of increasing Helicobacter pylori resistance to clarithromycin and metronidazole used in standard treatments, newer well-tolerated regimens with high eradication success rates in practice are urgently needed. In this edition of the American Journal of Gastroenterology, a clinical trial of a novel drug combination is presented, demonstrating significantly more success in comparison with a standard "triple therapy." The new regimen (referred to as LOAD) comprises three antibiotics, levofloxaxin, doxycycline, and nitazoxanide, together with omeprazole. The LOAD regimen had around a 90% eradication rate compared with only 73% with a standard "triple therapy" regimen of amoxicillin, clarithromycin, and lansoprazole. The use of this relatively expensive novel drug combination would represent an absolute increased eradication rate of 17%, with a number needed to treat to achieve one more successful eradication of 5.88. Results from this preliminary study should prompt further evaluation of LOAD in rigorously designed clinical studies.     

Update on therapeutic options for <Emphasis Type="Italic">Helicobacter pylori</Emphasis>-related diseases

Triple therapy including clarithromycin, amoxicillin, and a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) has been recommended as the treatment of choice for Helicobacter pylori eradication. This regimen is now challenged by an increasing level of clarithromycin resistance that jeopardizes the treatment success. When clarithromycin resistance has been detected, or when its rate is known to be high in the geographic area, this drug cannot be used. It can be replaced by metronidazole, the resistance of which has a limited clinical relevance. Another option is to prescribe tetracycline and metronidazole with a PPI or ranitidine bismuth citrate. New antibiotics such as levofloxacin or rifabutin can also be used in combination with amoxicillin and a PPI. Probiotics can be added to all of these regimens to improve compliance by decreasing adverse events. But some authors advocate a quadruple therapy as a first-line treatment. Solutions to improve the limitations of this last regimen are now being proposed. Clarification of the controversial treatment indications such as gastroesophageal reflux disease or prevention of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug gastroduodenal symptoms has been made. The question of prevention of gastric carcinoma by H. pylori eradication remains unanswered.     

Rescue therapy using a rifabutin-based regimen is effective for cure of Helicobacter pylori infection

OBJECTIVE:

To evaluate the efficacy of rescue therapy using rifabutin, amoxicillin and a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) in the eradication of Helicobacter pylori in patients who have failed at least one course of PPI-based triple therapy.

METHODS:

The present study was a single-centre case series of 16 consecutive patients who had received at least one course of standard eradication therapy. Pretreatment evaluation included endoscopy with biopsies for histology and culture for H pylori infection. Treatment consisted of a one-week regimen containing a PPI twice daily, amoxicillin (A) 1 g twice daily and rifabutin (R) 300 mg once daily (PPI-AR). Post-treatment evaluation consisted of a repeat endoscopy with biopsy for histology and culture, or a validated urea breath test at least four weeks after treatment was completed. Pretreatment antibiotic susceptibility to metronidazole, clarithromycin and A was evaluated using a validated epsilometer test.

RESULTS:

Of the 16 patients, four had previously received one course of triple therapy, 10 had received two courses and two had received more than two courses. The overall success rate of PPI-AR was 63% (10 of 16). Resistance to A was 0% (0 of 13), metronidazole 77% (10 of 13), clarithromycin 70% (seven of 10), and both metronidazole and clarithromycin 60% (six of 10). There was no correlation between resistance patterns and cure rate.

CONCLUSIONS:

An R-containing regimen such as PPI-AR is a viable option as rescue therapy for H pylori infection.     

Rescue therapy after Helicobacter pylori eradication failure

Despite the use of currently-recommended therapies, at least 20% of patients remain infected after a first attempt at Helicobacter pylori eradication. Therefore, when designing a therapeutic strategy, rather than focus exclusively on the result of the first eradication therapy, from the outset physicians should plan the sequence of consecutively administered combinations with the highest possibility of achieving a 100% success rate. The choice of rescue therapy depends on the drugs used in the first eradication attempt, since repeating the same antibiotic is not recommended. Systematic bacterial culture after a first H. pylori eradication failure does not seem to be required in clinical practice and this technique can be reserved for patients with a second failed attempt. There are several possibilities for empirical rescue therapy (without knowing the bacterial sensitivity). After failure of the combination of a proton pump inhibitor (PPI), amoxicillin and clarithromycin -the most widely used combination in Spain-, quadruple therapy (PPI-bismuth-tetracycline-metronidazole) has been the most widely used treatment. More recently, levofloxacin (together with amoxicillin and a PPI) is as effective as quadruple therapy, or more so, and has the advantage of being simpler and better tolerated. In addition, rescue therapy with levofloxacin is a promising third-line alternative after failure of two eradication therapies containing key antibiotics such as amoxicillin, clarithromycin, metronidazole and tetracycline. Finally, rifabutin-based therapies have achieved promising results and are even effective in patients with multiple failures or multiple antibiotic resistance.     

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing before first-line treatment for Helicobacter pylori infection in patients with dual or triple antibiotic resistance

AIM To evaluate the efficacy of antimicrobial susceptibilityguided therapy before first-line treatment for infection in patients with dual or triple antibiotic resistance.METHODS A total of 1034 patients infected by Helicobacter pylori(H. pylori) during 2013-2014 were tested for antimicrobial susceptibility. 157 of 1034(15%) patients showed resistance to two(127/1034; 12%) and to three(30/1034; 3%) antibiotics. Sixty-eight patients with dual H. pylori-resistance(clarithromycin, metronidazole or levofloxacin) were treated for 10 d with triple therapies: OAL(omeprazole 20 mg b.i.d., amoxicillin 1 g b.i.d., and levofloxacin 500 mg b.i.d.) 43cases, OAM(omeprazole 20 mg b.i.d., amoxicillin 1 g b.i.d., and metronidazole 500 mg b.i.d.) 12 cases and OAC(omeprazole 20 mg b.id., amoxicillin 1 g b.i.d., and clarithromycin 500 mg b.i.d.) 13 cases based on the antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Twelve patients showed triple H. pylori-resistance(clarithromycin, metronidazole and levofloxacin) and received for 10 d triple therapy with OAR(omeprazole 20 mg b.id., amoxicillin 1 g b.i.d., and rifabutin 150 mg b.i.d.). Eradication was confirmed by 13C-urea breath test. Adverse effects and compliance were assessed by a questionnaire. RESULTS Intention-to-treat eradication rates were: OAL(97.6%), OAM(91.6%), OAC(92.3%) and OAR(58.3%). Cure rate was significantly higher in na?ve patients treated with OAR-10 compared to patients who had two or three previous treatment failures(83% vs 33%). Adverse events rates for OAL, OAM, OAC and OAR were 22%, 25%, 23% and 17%, respectively, all of them mild-moderate. CONCLUSION Antimicrobial susceptibility-guided triple therapies during 10 d for first-line treatment leads to an eradication rate superior to 90% in patients with dual antibiotic H. pylori resistance.