Left lateral segment pediatric liver transplantation: a 25 year experience at Mount Sinai

BackgroundOutcomes of left lateral segment (LLS) grafts in pediatric recipients were compared between living (LD-LLS) and deceased donor (DD-LLS) grafts.Methods195 LLS grafts (99DD-LLS-96LD-LLS) were analyzed with a median follow-up of 9.1years. The primary endpoints were overall patient/graft survival.ResultsLD-LLS grafts were younger (0.9vs.1.4years, p = 0.039), more likely to have a fulminant liver failure (17.9%vs.5.3%,p = 0.002), less likely to have a metabolic disorder (6.3%vs.25.5%,p = 0.002), and less likely to be undergoing retransplantation (5.3% vs.16.2%,p = 0.015). There was a trend toward decreased hepatic artery thrombosis in LD-LLS grafts (6.6% vs. 15.5%,p = 0.054). No differences in the overall biliary complications occurred. The LD-LLS group had prolonged survival compared to the DD-LLS group with 10-year survival rates of 81%, and 74% (p = 0.005), respectively. LD-LLS grafts had longer graft survival compared to DD-LLS grafts (10-year graft survival 85%vs.67%,p = 0.005). Recipient age >1year (HR 2.39,p = 0.026), aortic reconstruction (HR 2.12,p = 0.046) and vascular complication (HR 3.12,p < 0.001) were independent predictors of poor patient survival. Non-biliary liver disease (HR 2.17,p = 0.015), DD-LLS (HR 2.06,p = 0.034) and vascular complication (HR 4.61,p < 0.001) were independent predictors of poor graft survival.ConclusionThe use of SLT remains a viable option with excellent long-term outcomes. We show improved graft and patient survival with living donor grafts.     

Laparoscopic versus open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in elderly patients: a propensity score matching analysis

BackgroundSurgical resection is a first-line curative option for hepatocellular carcinoma, but its role is still unclear in elderly patients. The aim of our study was to compare short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic and open liver resection in elderly patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.MethodsThe study included 665 consecutive hepatocellular carcinoma liver resection cases in patients with ≥70 years of age treated in eight European hospital centres. Patients were divided into laparoscopic and open liver resection groups. Perioperative and long-term outcomes were compared between these groups.ResultsAfter a 1:1 propensity score matching, 219 patients were included in each group. Clavien-Dindo grades III/IV (6 vs. 20%, p = 0.04) were lower in the laparoscopic than in the open matched group. Hospital stay was shorter in the laparoscopic than in the open matched group (5 vs. 7 days, p < 0.001). There were no significant differences between laparoscopic and open groups regarding overall survival and disease-free survival at 1-, 3- and 5- year periods.ConclusionLaparoscopic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma is associated with good short-term outcomes in patients with ≥70 years of age compared to open liver resection. Laparoscopic liver resection is safe and feasible in elderly patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.     

Survival outcomes in liver transplant recipients with Model for End‐stage Liver Disease scores of 40 or higher: a decade‐long experience

BackgroundThe Model for End‐stage Liver Disease (MELD) has been used as a prognostic tool since 2002 to predict pre‐transplant mortality. Increasing proportions of transplant candidates with higher MELD scores, combined with improvements in transplant outcomes, mandate the need to study surgical outcomes in patients with MELD scores of ≥40.MethodsA retrospective longitudinal analysis of United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) data on all liver transplantations performed between February 2002 and June 2011 (n= 33 398) stratified by MELD score (<30, 30–39, ≥40) was conducted. The primary outcomes of interest were short‐ and longterm graft and patient survival. A Kaplan–Meier product limit method and Cox regression were used. A subanalysis using a futile population was performed to determine futility predictors.ResultsOf the 33 398 transplant recipients analysed, 74% scored <30, 18% scored 30–39, and 8% scored ≥40 at transplantation. Recipients with MELD scores of ≥40 were more likely to be younger (P < 0.001), non‐White and to have shorter waitlist times (P< 0.001). Overall patient survival correlated inversely with increasing MELD score; this trend was consistent for both short‐term (30 days and 90 days) and longterm (1, 3 and 5 years) graft and patient survival. In multivariate analysis, increasing age, African‐American ethnicity, donor obesity and diabetes were negative predictors of survival. Futility predictors included patient age of >60 years, obesity, peri‐transplantation intensive care unit hospitalization with ventilation, and multiple comorbidities.ConclusionsLiver transplantation in recipients with MELD scores of ≥40 offers acceptable longterm survival outcomes. Futility predictors indicate the need for prospective follow‐up studies to define the population to gain the highest benefit from this precious resource.     

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease after liver transplantation in patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis and cryptogenic cirrhosis: the impact of pre-transplant graft steatosis

BackgroundNonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) may occur in liver transplant recipients. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence and risk factors of NAFLD after liver transplantation in patients with NASH and cryptogenic cirrhosis, focusing on the impact of graft steatosis.MethodsPatients with NASH and cryptogenic cirrhosis who had undergone liver transplantation in Shiraz transplant center between March 2010 and March 2017 were included. NAFLD was diagnosed after liver transplantation using ultrasonography and transient elastography.Results73 patients with NASH and 389 with cryptogenic cirrhosis were included. NAFLD was diagnosed in 33 patients (56.9%) in NASH group and 96 patients (26.7%) in cryptogenic group (OR: 3.61; CI: 2.04–6.39; P-Value < 0.001), using ultrasound. Obesity and post-transplant hyperlipidemia were independent predictors of NAFLD after liver transplantation (P < 0.05). NAFLD was diagnosed in 32.9% of patients with graft macrosteatosis compared to 29.9% in patients without graft macrosteatosis (OR: 1.51; 95%CI: 0.755–1.753). 28% of the patients with macrosteatosis ≥30% had NAFLD after liver transplantation compared to 31.4% with macrosteatosis <30% (OR: 1.175; 95% CI: 0.346–2.091).ConclusionLiver graft steatosis before transplantation was not associated with the occurrence of NAFLD after liver transplantation.     

A decline in functional status while awaiting liver transplantation is predictive of increased post-transplantation mortality

BackgroundFunctional status (FS) is dynamic and changes over time. We examined how changes in FS while awaiting liver transplantation influence post-transplant outcomes.MethodsData on adult liver transplants performed in the United States during the MELD era were obtained through September 2020. Patient and graft survival were compared between groups with no change or improved FS, and those with worsening FS.ResultsOf the 90,210 transplant recipients included in the analysis, 39,193 (43%) had worsening FS, which was associated with longer waiting-list time (187 vs. 329 days, p < 0.001) and worse patient survival after liver transplant (1858 vs. 1727 days, p < 0.001). A consistent and dose-dependent relationship was observed for each 10-point decrease in Karnofsky Performance Score and post-transplant survival. Multivariable regression analysis confirmed that a decline in FS was associated with worse patient survival (HR 1.15, p < 0.001). Similar findings were observed for graft survival.ConclusionA decline in FS on the waiting-list is associated with significantly greater post-liver transplant mortality in recipients. These results should be taken into consideration when allocating organs and determining transplant candidacy. Strategies to optimize FS prior to transplantation should be prioritized as even subtle decreases in FS are associated with inferior post-transplantation outcomes.     

Comparison between galectin-3 and YKL-40 levels for the assessment of liver fibrosis in cirrhotic patients

Background and study aimsThe circulatory levels of Galectin-3 and YKL-40 are considered as candidate biomarkers for the noninvasive assessment of liver fibrosis. This study aimed to evaluate the plasma protein profiles of Galectin-3 and YKL-40 in patients with cirrhosis (with and without hepatocellular carcinoma [HCC]) who underwent deceased-donor liver transplantation (LT), before and after surgery.Patients and methodsThe plasma levels of Galectin-3 and YKL-40 were assessed in 46 subjects, including 24 liver graft recipients (before, 1 day after, and 1 month after LT) and 22 healthy controls using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays.ResultsThe levels of Galectin-3 and YKL-40 in the LT recipients before the transplant were significantly higher than those in the healthy controls (p < 0.001 and p < 0.01, respectively). YKL-40 levels returned to normal within 1 day after LT, whereas those of Galectin-3 decreased 1 day after LT and returned to normal levels after 1 month. The levels of both proteins did not differ between patients with and without HCC. Unlike YKL-40, the pre-transplant levels of Galectin-3 were directly correlated to that of aspartate aminotransferase (AST; r = 0.473, p = 0.01), alanine aminotransferase (r = 0.395, p = 0.04), total bilirubin (r = 0.545, p = 0.003), and lactate dehydrogenase (r = 0.452, p = 0.02) and to the AST to platelet ratio index (APRI; r = 0.411, p = 0.03) and Child–Pugh score (r = 0.601, p < 0.001). Galectin-3 levels increased significantly according to the severity of cirrhosis (25.9 ± 2.7; 57.4 ± 29.6; and 81 ± 27 ng/mL in Class A, B, and C cirrhosis, respectively), whereas those of YKL-40 tended to be higher in the Class C patients compared to the Class A patients (8.9 ± 2.6 vs. 7.4 ± 0.8 ng/mL).ConclusionCirculating levels of Galectin-3 could be an indicator of liver damage and inflammation that are correlated with fibrosis.     

Outcomes after liver transplantation for alcoholic hepatitis are similar to alcoholic cirrhosis: exploratory analysis from the UNOS database

Data on liver transplantation for patients with alcoholic hepatitis are limited. Using the United Network for Organ Sharing database (2004-2010), adults undergoing liver transplantation for a listing diagnosis of alcoholic hepatitis were matched for age, gender, ethnicity, and model for endstage disease (MELD) score, donor risk index, and year of transplantation with three patients transplanted for a listing diagnosis of alcoholic cirrhosis. Study outcomes of graft and patient survival on follow-up were also analyzed for cohorts based on the diagnosis of the explant (46 alcoholic hepatitis and 138 alcoholic cirrhosis) and diagnosis at both listing as well as of the explant (11 alcoholic hepatitis and 33 alcoholic cirrhosis). Five-year graft and patient survival of alcoholic hepatitis and alcoholic cirrhosis patients were 75% and 73% (P = 0.97) and 80% and 78% (P = 0.90), respectively. Five-year graft and patient survival rates were also similar for cohorts based on diagnosis of the explant and diagnosis at listing as well as explant. Cox proportional regression analysis adjusting for other variables showed no impact of the etiology of liver disease (alcoholic hepatitis versus alcoholic cirrhosis) on the graft and patient survival. The causes of graft loss and patient mortality were similar in the two groups, and were not alcohol-related in any patient. CONCLUSION: Compared with alcoholic cirrhosis, patients with alcoholic hepatitis have similar posttransplantation graft and patient survival. Based on these preliminary findings, liver transplantation may be considered in a select group of patients with alcoholic hepatitis who fail to improve with medical therapy. Prospective studies are needed to assess the long-term outcome after liver transplantation in patients with alcoholic hepatitis.     

Recurrence of diseases following orthotopic liver transplantation

Long-term graft survival and mortality after liver transplantation continue to improve. However, disease recurrence remains a major stumbling block, especially among patients with hepatitis C. Chronic hepatitis C recurs to varying degrees in nearly all patients who undergo transplantation. Transplantation for hepatitis C is associated with higher rates of graft failure and death compared with transplantation for other indications, and retransplantation for hepatitis C related liver failure remains controversial. Recurrence of hepatitis B has been markedly reduced with improved prophylactic regimens. Further, rates of hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence have also decreased, as improved patient selection criteria have prioritized transplantation for those with a low risk of recurrence. Primary biliary cirrhosis recurs in some patients, but it is often relatively mild. Autoimmune liver disease has also been shown to have a relatively benign post-transplantation course, but some studies have indicated that it slowly progresses in most recipients. It has been recently reported that alcoholic liver disease liver transplant recipients who return to drinking have worsened mortality. In such patients worse outcomes are not due to graft failure, but instead to other comorbidities. Recurrences of other diseases, including nonalcoholic steatohepatitis and primary sclerosing cholangitis, are now being recognized as having potentially detrimental effects on graft survival and mortality. Expert clinical management may help prevent and treat complications associated with disese recurrence.     

Prognostic factors influencing outcome in adult liver transplantation using hypernatremic organ donation after brain death

BackgroundHypernatremic donors was regarded as the expanded criteria donors in liver transplantation. The study was to investigate the effects of donor hypernatremia on the outcomes of liver transplantation and identify the prognostic factors possibly contributing to the poor outcomes.MethodsDonor serum sodium levels before procurement were categorized as normal sodium (< 155 mmol/L), moderate high sodium (155–170 mmol/L), and severe high sodium (≥ 170 mmol/L). Furthermore, we subdivided the 142 hypernatremic donors (≥ 155 mmol/L) into two subgroups: subgroup A, the exposure time of liver grafts from hypernatremia to reperfusion was < 36 h; and subgroup B, the exposure time was ≥ 36 h. The outcomes included initial graft function, survival rates of grafts and recipients, graft loss and early events within the first year following liver transplantation.ResultsThere were no significant differences in the 1-year survival rates of grafts and recipients, 1-year graft loss rates and early events among the normal, moderate high and severe high sodium groups. However, the overall survival rates of grafts and recipients in subgroup A were significantly higher than those in subgroup B. Cox model showed that the exposure time (HR = 1.117; 95% CI: 1.053–1.186; P < 0.001), cold ischemia time (HR = 1.015; 95% CI: 1.006–1.024; P = 0.001) and MELD (HR = 1.061; 95% CI: 1.003–1.121; P = 0.037) were the important prognostic factors contributing to the poor outcomes of recipients with hypernatremic donors.ConclusionsThe level of donor sodium immediately before organ procurement does not have negative effects on the early outcomes following adult liver transplantation. For hypernatremia liver donors, minimization of the exposure time from hypernatremia to reperfusion is critical to prevent graft loss.     

Treatment and outcomes of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with Sickle cell disease: a population-based study in the U.S.

BackgroundSickle cell disease (SCD) is a rare hemoglobinopathy which can result in chronic liver disease and cirrhosis. Patients with SCD have an increased risk of hematologic malignancy, but the prevalence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in this population is unknown. Herein, the association of SCD with HCC was examined using registry data.MethodsThe SEER-Medicare database was queried to identify patients diagnosed with HCC between 2000 and 2015, and further stratified by SCD status. Propensity matching was performed to examine cancer-related survival and treatment outcomes.ResultsOverall 56,934 patients with HCC were identified, including 81 patients with SCD. Patients with SCD more frequently had cirrhosis [48.1% (39/81) vs 23.5% (13,377/56,853), p < 0.01] yet presented with smaller tumors [<5 cm: 51.9% (42/81) vs 38.5% (21,898/56,853), p = 0.01]. After propensity matching, SCD was not associated with attenuated survival (aHR 0.73 95%CI 0.52–1.01). When stratified by treatment, patients with SCD had equivalent outcomes to chemotherapy (p = 0.65), TACE/TARE (p = 0.35), resection (p = 0.15) and transplantation (p = 0.67) when compared to non-SCD patients.ConclusionThis study confirms that a subset of patients with SCD will develop HCC. Importantly, therapeutic options for HCC should not be limited by pre-existing SCD, and similar survival should be expected when compared to non-SCD patients.     

Simultaneous liver and kidney transplantation in elderly patients: Outcomes and validation of a clinical risk score for patient selection

Introduction and aim. Many transplant programs have expanded eligibility to include patients previously ineligible because of advanced age. Outcomes of simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation (SLK) in recipients with advanced age are not known.Material and methods. Data from patients undergoing transplantation between 2002 and 2015 were obtained from the UNOS Standard Analysis and Research file.Results. SLK recipients aged ≥ 65 years (N = 677), SLK recipients aged < 65 years (N = 4517), and recipients of liver transplant alone(LTA) aged ≥ 65 years(N = 8495) were compared. Recipient characteristics were similar between the SLK groups. Similar patient and graft survival were observed in SLK recipients aged ≥ 65 years compared to SLK recipients aged < 65 years and LTA recipients aged ≥ 65 years. Importantly, in a subgroup analysis, superior survival was seen in the SLK group aged ≥ 65 years compared to LTA recipients aged ≥ 65 years who underwent dialysis in the week prior to transplantation (p < 0.001). A prediction model of patient survival was developed for the SLK group aged ≥ 65 years with predictors including: age ≥ 70 years (3 points), calculated MELD score (-1 to 2 points), and recipient ventilator status at the time of SLK (4 points). The risk score predicted patient survival, with a significantly inferior survival seen in patients with a score ≥ 4 (p < 0.001).Conclusions. Age should not be used as a contraindication for SLK transplantation. The validated scoring system provides a guide for patient selection and can be used when evaluating elderly patients for SLK transplantation listing.     

Effect of acute on chronic liver failure over post-transplant survival

Introduction and ObjectivesAcute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) is associated with reduced short-term survival, and liver transplantation is frequently the only therapeutic option. Nonetheless, the post-transplantation prognosis seems to be worse in ACLF patients.Materials and MethodsThe databases of two university centers were retrospectively evaluated, and adult patients with cirrhosis who underwent transplantation between 2013 and 2020 were included. One-year survival of patients with ACLF was compared to that of patients without ACLF. Variables associated with mortality were identified.ResultsA total of 428 patients were evaluated, and 303 met the inclusion criteria; 57.1% were male, the mean age was 57.1 ± 10.2 years, 75 patients had ACLF, and 228 did not. The main etiologies of ACLF were NASH (36.6%), alcoholic liver disease (13.9%), primary biliary cholangitis (8.6%) and autoimmune hepatitis (7.9%). Mechanical ventilation, renal replacement therapy, the use of vasopressors and the requirement of blood product transfusion during liver transplantation were significantly more frequent in ACLF patients. Among those recipients without and with ACLF, survival at 1, 3 and 5 years was 91.2% vs. 74.7%, 89.1% vs. 72.6% and 88.3% vs. 72.6%, respectively (p=0.001). Among pre-transplantation variables, only the presence of ACLF was independently associated with survival (HR 3.2, 95% CI: 1.46-7.11). Post-transplantation variables independently associated with survival were renal replacement therapy (HR 2.8, 95% CI: 1.1-6.8) and fungal infections (HR 3.26, 95% CI: 1.07-9.9).ConclusionsACLF is an independent predictor of one-year post-transplantation survival. Importantly, transplant recipients with ACLF require the use of more resources than patients without ACLF.     

Clinical and survival outcomes after hepatectomy in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver and hepatitis B-related hepatocellular carcinoma

BackgroundThe prevalence of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease-related hepatocellular carcinoma (NAFLD-HCC) has increased parallelly with that of metabolic syndrome. This study aimed to compare the clinical and survival outcomes of NAFLD-HCC and HBV-related HCC(HBV-HCC).MethodsThe medical records of patients who underwent hepatectomy for HCC at Severance Hospital between 2005 and 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. Occult HBV infection was identified by nested PCR. Propensity score matching (PSM) was conducted to minimize lead-time bias caused by the lack of surveillance in NAFLD patients. Surgical and oncologic outcomes were compared between the two groups.ResultsThere were 32 patients (7%) with NAFLD-HCC, 200 (46%) with HBV-HCC, and 194 (44%) with HBV/NAFLD-HCC (HBV and NAFLD). Before PSM, cirrhosis was more frequently detected in HBV-HCC patients (55% vs 15%, p < 0.001) and the average tumor size was larger in the NAFLD-HCC group than in the HBV-HCC group (4.4 ± 3.3 cm vs 3.4 ± 1.8 cm, p = 0.014). After a median follow-up of 74 months (range 0–157 months), survival analyses before PSM showed better 5-year overall survival (OS) in HBV-HCC patients than in NAFLD-HCC patients (80% vs 63%, p = 0.041). After PSM, 5-year OS rates were similar (60% vs 63%, p = 0.978). There were no differences between the groups in recurrence-free or disease-specific survival before and after PSM.ConclusionPatients with NAFLD-HCC were less likely to have underlying cirrhosis but more likely to have larger tumors at the time of diagnosis than patients with HBV-HCC. The OS of patients with NAFLD-HCC appeared to be worse than that of patients with HBV-HCC. Therefore, active HCC surveillance is recommended in patients with metabolic syndrome for the early detection of HCC.     

Laparoscopic surgery versus radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of single hepatocellular carcinoma ≤3 cm in the elderly: a propensity score matching analysis

BackgroundLaparoscopic liver resection (LLR) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) represented potential treatments for patients with a single hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) smaller than 3 cm. As the aging population soared, our study aimed to examine the advantage/drawback balance for these treatments, which should be reassessed in elderly patients.MethodsA multicentric retrospective study compared 184 elderly patients (aged >70 years) (86 patients underwent LLR and 98 had RFA) with single ≤3 cm HCC, observed from January 2009 to January 2019.ResultsAfter propensity score matching (PSM), the estimated 1- and 3-year overall survival rates were 96.5 and 87.9% for the LLR group, and 94.6 and 68.1% for the RFA group (p = 0.001) respectively. The estimated 1- and 3-year disease-free survival rates were 92.5 and 67.4% for the LLR group, and 68.5 and 36.9% for the RFA group (p = 0.001). Patients with HCC of anterolateral segments were more often treated with laparoscopic resection (47 vs. 36, p = 0.04). The median operative time in the resection group was 205 min and 25 min in the RFA group (p = 0.01). Length of hospital stay was 5 days in the resection group and 3 days in the RFA group (p = 0.03).ConclusionDespite a longer length of hospital stay and operative time, LLR guarantees a comparable postoperative course and a better overall and disease-free survival in elderly patients with single HCC (≤3 cm), located in anterolateral segments.     

Impact of pancreatic comorbidities in patients with end-stage liver disease on outcome after liver transplantation

BackgroundDiseases leading to end-stage liver disease (ESLD), especially alcoholic liver cirrhosis cause comorbidities of the pancreas, too. The aim of this retrospective study was to determine the impact of pancreatic alterations diagnosed pretransplant on the outcome after liver transplantation (LT).MethodsIn total, data from 372 LT patients were analyzed. Patients were followed up for a mean of 4.2 years. Incidence of chronic pancreatitis (CP), pancreatic cysts (PC) and intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) was acquired retrospectively from patient's charts.ResultsCP, IPMN and PC were rarely diagnosed in LT-recipients [CP (3.8%), PC (1.6%) and IPMN (1.6%)]. There was no significant correlation of IPMN, CP, PC and other patient characteristics. The prevalence of CP (log rank: p = 0.315), PC (log rank: p = 0.242) and IPMN (log rank: p = 0.491) did not influence patient survival.ConclusionFrequency of radiological alterations of the pancreas in LT recipients (such as CP, PC, IPMN) diagnosed by sonography, CT scan or MRI is comparable to the non-transplant population. Short term survival of LT-recipients after transplantation is not reduced for patients with CP, PC and patients with branch-duct IPMN (with a low-risk for malignancy according to international consensus guidelines).     

Is liver transplantation safe and effective in elderly (≥70 years) recipients? A case-controlled analysis

BackgroundElderly patients are evaluated for liver transplantation (LT) with increasing frequency, but outcomes in this group have not been well defined.MethodsA linkage of the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) and the University HealthSystem Consortium (UHC) databases identified 12 445 patients who underwent LT during 2007–2011. Two cohorts were created consisting of, respectively, elderly recipients aged ≥70 years (n = 323) and recipients aged 18–69 years (n = 12 122). A 1:1 case-matched analysis was performed based on propensity scores.ResultsElderly recipients had lower Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) scores at LT (median 15 versus 19; P < 0.0001), more often underwent transplantation at high-volume centres (46% versus 33%; P < 0.0001) and more often received grafts from donors aged >60 years (24% versus 15%; P < 0.0001). The two cohorts had similar hospital lengths of stay, in-hospital mortality, hospital costs and 30-day readmission rates. There were no differences in graft survival between the two cohorts (P = 0.10), but elderly recipients had worse longterm overall survival (P = 0.009). However, a case-controlled analysis confirmed similar perioperative hospital outcomes, graft survival and longterm patient survival in the two matched cohorts.ConclusionsElderly LT recipients accounted for <3% of all LTs performed during 2007–2011. Selected elderly recipients have perioperative outcomes and survival similar to those in younger adults.     

The influence of age on outcome after renal transplantation

The influence of donor age and recipient age on outcome after renal transplantation has been investigated in numerous studies. There is some evidence that patient survival in elderly patients who receive a transplant is significantly higher compared with those, who remain on dialysis. In general, patient survival after renal transplantation is mainly dependent on recipient age and on comorbid conditions. Concerning graft survival, most studies conclude that the survival of kidneys taken from older donors (>50 years) and very young donors (<5 years) is reduced. Graft survival was also found to be reduced in very young recipients (<5 years). Functional graft survival proved to be better in older recipients (>50 years) as compared to younger recipients, due to a reduced immunologic response capability. Actual graft survival however, where cases of death with functioning graft are included, is fairly equal in both populations. The question, whether the age difference between donor and recipient has an influence on graft survival, needs to be further investigated. In conclusion, donor and recipient age are important risk factors, which may influence outcome after renal transplantation and therefore should be considered carefully.     

Kidney Transplantation in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis B Virus Infection

The impact of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection on the long-term outcome of kidney transplant patients is controversial. A total of 34 chronic hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) carriers among 143 renal allograft recipients were identified in this study (mean follow-up period: 5.6 ± 3.3 years; range: 1–13 years). During the follow-up, one HBsAg-positive recipient with preexisting cirrhosis died of liver failure, and seven (21%) others developed serious HBV-related complications (four fulminant hepatitis, two hepatocellular carcinoma, one cirrhosis), and four died. Although HBsAg-positive recipients had a higher rate of liver-related complications and deaths than HBsAg-negative recipients did, there were no significant differences in the long-term graft and patient survival between the two groups. The survival rates, liver-related complications, and deaths in HBsAg-positive allograft recipients and 28 HBsAg-positive uremic patients under dialysis were similar. In conclusion, HBV infection is not a contraindication to kidney transplantation. However, pretransplant candidates should be warned of potentially serious liver-related complications.     

Feasibility and safety of liver transplantation or resection after transarterial radioembolization with Yttrium-90 for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma

BackgroundThe benefit of transarterial radioembolization (TARE) in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is increasingly evidenced. However, data on outcome of liver transplantation or resection after TARE remain scarce. This study aimed to assess the safety and feasibility of surgery after TARE in patients with unresectable HCC.MethodsPatients exclusively undergoing TARE followed by either orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) or liver resection (LR) for HCC between 2012 and 2016 were included. Primary outcomes were postoperative morbidity and mortality. Secondary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and response to TARE.ResultsAmong 349 patients with HCC treated with TARE, 32 (9%) underwent either OLT (n = 22) or LR (n = 10), which represent the study cohort. In this group, TARE induced decreased viable nodules (p < 0.001), an efficient downsizing (p < 0.001) as well as a significant downstaging based on BCLC classification (p < 0.001). Overall, major complications and mortality after surgery occurred in 5 (16%) and 1 (3%) patients, respectively. For the whole study cohort, OS was 47 months while survival rates at 1-, 3- and 5-years reached 97%, 86% and 86%, respectively.DiscussionLiver surgery after TARE is feasible and safe. This strategy allows to offer a curative treatment in a subset of patients with unresectable HCC.     

Impact of emerging hepatitis C virus treatments on future needs for liver transplantation in France: A modelling approach

BackgroundIn light of the impact of emerging hepatitis C virus treatments on morbidity and mortality, we sought to determine whether candidates for liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma and decompensated cirrhosis will decrease sufficiently to match liver grafts for hepatitis C virus-infected patients.AimsUsing a Markov model, we quantified future liver graft needs for hepatitis C virus-induced diseases and estimated the impact of current and emerging treatments.MethodsWe simulated progression of yearly-hepatitis-C-virus-infected cohorts from the beginning of the epidemic and calculated 2013–2022 candidates for liver transplantation up until 2022 without and with therapies. We compared these estimated numbers to projected trends in liver grafts for hepatitis C virus.ResultsOverall, current treatment would avoid transplantation of 4425 (4183–4684) potential candidates during the period 2013–2022. It would enable an 88% and 42% reduction in the gap between liver transplantation activity and candidates for hepatocellular carcinoma and decompensated cirrhosis, respectively. Emerging hepatitis C virus treatments would allow adequacy in transplant activities for hepatocellular carcinoma. However, they would not lead to adequacy in decompensated cirrhosis from 2013 to 2022. Results were robust to sensitivity analysis.ConclusionOur study indicates that patients will benefit from public health policies regarding hepatitis C virus screening and therapeutic access to new emerging treatments.