Prognostic value of positive histological margins in patients with pancreatic head ductal adenocarcinoma and lymph node involvement: an international multicentric study

BackgroundResection margin status and lymph node (LN) involvement are known prognostic factors for patients who undergo pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). This study aimed to compare overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) by resection margin status in patients with PDAC and LN involvement.MethodsA retrospective international multicentric study was performed including four Western centers. Multivariable Cox analysis was performed to identify prognostic factors of OS and DFS. Median OS and DFS were calculated using Kaplan–Meier curves and compared using log-rank tests.ResultsA cohort of 814 PDAC patients with pancreatoduodenectomy were analyzed. A total of 651 patients had LN involvement (80%). On multivariable analysis R1 resection was not an independent factor of worse OS and DFS in patients with LN involvement (HR 1.1, p = 0.565; HR 1.2, p = 0.174). Only tumor size, grade, and adjuvant chemotherapy were associated with OS and DFS. Median OS and DFS were similar between patients with R0 and R1 resections (23 vs. 20 months, p = 0.196; 15 vs. 14 months, p = 0.080).ConclusionResection status was not identified as predictor of OS or DFS in PDAC patients with LN involvement. Extensive surgery to achieve R0 resection in such patients might not influence the disease course.     

Completion of adjuvant therapy in patients with resected pancreatic cancer

BackgroundAdjuvant chemotherapy is the standard of care for resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). It is estimated that only 40–80% eligible patients initiate intended adjuvant chemotherapy. Completion rates are largely unknown.MethodsA retrospective analysis of outcomes of patients with resected PDAC over an 8-year period at H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center (MCC) was performed.ResultsFrom a total of 309 patients, 299 were included for further analysis. 242 (81%) initiated adjuvant therapy (AT) and 195 (65%) completed the intended course. The median time-to-initiation of AT was 53 days (7.6 weeks). The most common reasons for early discontinuation of AT (n = 47) were toxicity (n = 29), disease recurrence (n = 9), patient decision (n = 4), unrelated comorbidities (n = 3), and death (n = 1). Completion of AT was an independent predictor of overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) on multivariable analysis (OS: HR 0.41, CI 0.27–0.61, p < 0.001; RFS: HR 0.52, CI 0.36–0.76, p < 0.001). Factors associated with early termination of AT were vascular resection (OR 0.29, CI 0.13–0.67, p = 0.004) and administration of AT with local oncologist as opposed to MCC (OR 0.41, CI 0.21–0.82, p = 0.010).ConclusionCompletion of AT is associated with improved survival in patients with resected PDAC. Factors associated with an inability to complete AT include vascular resection and administration of AT with local care team in the patient's community.     

Preoperative predictors for early and very early disease recurrence in patients undergoing resection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

BackgroundThis study aimed to identify predictors for early and very early disease recurrence in patients undergoing resection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) resection with and without neoadjuvant therapy.MethodsIncluded were patients who underwent PDAC resection (2014–2016). Multivariable multinomial regression was performed to identify preoperative predictors for manifestation of recurrence within 3, 6 and 12 months after PDAC resection.Results836 patients with a median follow-up of 37 (interquartile range [IQR] 30–48) months and overall survival of 18 (IQR 10-32) months were analyzed. 670 patients (80%) developed recurrence: 82 patients (10%) <3 months, 96 patients (11%) within 3–6 months and 226 patients (27%) within 6–12 months. LogCA 19–9 (OR 1.25 [95% CI 1.10–1.41]; P < 0.001) and neoadjuvant treatment (OR 0.09 [95% CI 0.01–0.68]; P = 0.02) were associated with recurrence <3 months. LogCA 19–9 (OR 1.23 [95% CI 1.10–1.38]; P < 0.001) and 0–90° venous involvement on CT imaging (OR 2.93 [95% CI 1.60–5.37]; P < 0.001) were associated with recurrence within 3–6 months. A Charlson Age Comorbidity Index ≥4 (OR 1.53 [95% CI 1.09–2.16]; P = 0.02) and logCA 19–9 (OR 1.24 [95% CI 1.14–1.35]; P < 0.001) were related to recurrence within 6–12 months.ConclusionThis study demonstrates preoperative predictors that are associated with the manifestation of early and very early recurrence after PDAC resection. Knowledge of these predictors can be used to guide individualized surveillance and treatment strategies.     

Post-adjuvant chemotherapy CA19-9 levels predict prognosis in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: A retrospective cohort study

BackgroundCarbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) is a widely used tumor marker for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). In addition, several studies have reported the utility of both pre- and postoperative CA19-9 levels as prognostic factors in resectable PDAC. However, little is known about the implications of post-adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) CA19-9 levels. The purpose of this study was to examine the utility of the post-AC CA19-9 level as a prognostic marker for relapse-free survival (RFS) in resectable PDAC.MethodsA total of 119 patients who completed AC were analyzed (normal post-AC CA19-9, n = 79; high post-AC CA19-9, n = 40). The upper limit of the normal (ULN) serum level of CA19-9 was 37 U/mL.ResultsMedian RFS was significantly shorter for patients with high post-AC CA19-9 levels than for those with normal post-AC CA19-9 (10.4 months vs. 29.6 months, respectively; p < 0.001). After adjustment, high post-AC CA19-9 level was an independent predictive factor for short RFS (hazard ratio for RFS, 2.72). Median overall survival was significantly shorter in patients with high post-AC CA19-9 levels than in those with normal postoperative CA19-9 levels (24.7 months vs. 92.1 months, respectively; p < 0.001). The optimal cutoff value of post-AC CA19-9 levels for prediction of early recurrence was >1.5 × UNL (55.5 U/mL), with a 74.2% positive predictive value.ConclusionsThe present results show that high post-AC CA19-9 level is an independent prognostic factor for short RFS in patients with resected PDAC. In addition, it may be useful for predicting early recurrence.     

SUVmax after (18)fluoro-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography: A tool to define treatment strategies in pancreatic cancer

Background(18)fluoro-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18FDG-PET/CT) might be a useful tool in the management of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).AimsThe aim of this study was to analyze maximum standard uptake value (SUVmax) after 18FDG-PET/CT as predictor of survival outcomes and method to determine treatment strategies.MethodsA consecutive series of patients who underwent preoperative 18FDG-PET/CT and subsequent resection for PDAC were retrospectively reviewed. Patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy were excluded.Results46 patients were included in the analysis. Median follow-up was 27 months (4–67). Patients who recurred within 12 months showed a significantly higher preoperative median SUVmax (8.1 vs 6.1, p = 0.039). Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves for disease-free survival (DFS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) identified SUVmax of 6.0 as optimal cut-off. Multivariate analysis showed that SUVmax ≥ 6.0 was an independent predictor of poor DFS (HR 2.288, p = 0.024) and DSS (HR 4.875, p < 0.001). The combination of SUVmax ≥6.0 with CA19.9 ≥200 U/ml was significantly associated with survival outcomes in comparison to patients without concordantly elevated values.ConclusionSUVmax ≥6.0 is an independent predictor of DFS and DSS in resected PDAC. 18FDG-PET/CT might be considered in the preoperative evaluation of patients with pancreatic cancer.     

Computerized tomography scan in pre-diagnostic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: Stages of progression and potential benefits of early intervention: A retrospective study

BackgroundThe frequency, nature and timeline of changes on thin-slice (≤3 mm) multi-detector computerized tomography (CT) scans in the pre-diagnostic phase of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) are unknown. It is unclear if identifying imaging changes in this phase will improve PDAC survival beyond lead time.MethodsFrom a cohort of 128 subjects (Cohort A) with CT scans done 3–36 months before diagnosis of PDAC we developed a CTgram defining CT Stages (CTS) I through IV in the radiological progression of pre-diagnostic PDAC. We constructed Cohort B of PDAC resected at CTS I and II and compared survival in CTS I and II in Cohort A (n = 22 each; control natural history cohort) vs Cohort B (n = 33 and 72, respectively; early interception cohort).ResultsCTs were abnormal in 16% and 85% at 24–36 and 3–6 months respectively, before PDAC diagnosis. The PDAC CTgram stages, findings and median lead times (months) to clinical diagnosis were: CTS I: Abrupt duct cut-off/duct dilatation (−12.8); CTS II: Low density mass confined to pancreas (−9.5), CTS III: Peri-pancreatic infiltration (−5.8), CTS IV: Distant metastases (only at diagnosis). PDAC survival was better in cohort B than in cohort A despite inclusion of lead time in Cohort A: CTS I (36 vs 17.2 months, p = 0.03), CTS II (35.2 vs 15.3 months, p = 0.04).ConclusionStarting 12–18 months before PDAC diagnosis, progressive and increasingly frequent changes occur on CT scans. Resection of PDAC at the time of pre-diagnostic CT changes is likely to provide survival benefit beyond lead time.     

Focal pancreatic parenchyma atrophy is a harbinger of pancreatic cancer and a clue to the intraductal spreading subtype

Background/ObjectivesRadiological evidence of focal pancreatic parenchymal atrophy (FPPA) may presage early pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) development. We aimed to clarify the incidence of FPPA and the clinicopathological features of PDAC with FPPA before diagnosis.MethodsData on endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsies and surgical samples from 170 patients with pancreatic cancer histologically diagnosed between 2014 and 2019 were extracted from the pathology database of Komagome Hospital and Juntendo University hospital and retrospectively evaluated together with 51 patients without PDAC.ResultsFPPA was identified in 47/170 (28%) patients before PDAC diagnosis and in 2/51 (4%) patients in the control group (P < 0.01). The median duration from FPPA detection to diagnosis was 35 (interquartile range [IQR]:16–63) months. In 24/47 (51%) patients with FPPA, the atrophic area resolved.The lesion was in the head and body/tail in 7/40 and 67/56 of the patients with (n = 47) and without FPPA (n = 123), respectively (P < 0.001). Histopathologically confirmed non-invasive lesions in the main pancreatic duct and a positive surgical margin in the resected specimens occurred in 53% vs. 21% (P = 0.078) and 29% vs. 3% (P = 0.001) of the groups, respectively. The PDAC patients with FPPA accompanied by a malignant pancreatic resection margin had high-grade pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia.ConclusionsFPPA occurred in 28% of the PDAC group at 35 months prediagnosis. The FPPA area resolved before PDAC onset. Benchmarking previous images of the pancreas with the focus on FPPA may enable prediction of PDAC. PDAC with FPPA involves widespread high-grade pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia requiring a wide surgical margin for surgical excision.     

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and invasive intraductal papillary mucinous tumor: Different prognostic factors for different overall survival

BackgroundIt is unclear whether invasive intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) has different clinical and prognostic characteristics, beyond histological factors, when compared to pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).Aimscompare prognostic features of resected PDAC and invasive IPMNMethodsA retrospective study of patients resected for PDAC or invasive IPMN realized at Humanitas Cancer Center's Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Milan, Italy, between 2010 and 2016. Data recorded included patient demographics, onset symptoms, preoperative health status, tumor features, histology and surgical characteristics. Overall survival was estimated using Kaplan-Meier and prognostic factors for survival were assessed by multivariate Cox regression.ResultsA total of 332 patients were included (PDAC, n = 289; invasive IPMN, n = 43). Patients with invasive IPMN had better overall survival than PDAC patients (median: 76.6 versus 25.6 months; 5-year OS rate: 65.4% vs. 14.2%; p < 0.001). PDAC histology was associated with a significantly higher risk of death than IPMN (hazard ratio 1.815, 95% CI: 1.02, 3.24; p = 0.044). Survival was also worse with PDAC in early-stage disease (IA-IB-IIA, N0). In multivariate analysis, independent predictors of worse survival included perineural invasion, preoperative ASA physical status ≥3 and pain at diagnosis.ConclusionsPatients with IPMN had a better prognosis than PDAC patients, regardless of disease stage.     

The role of coeliac axis resection in resected ductal adenocarcinoma of the distal pancreas: A result of tumour topography or a prognostic factor?

BackgroundWhether coeliac axis resection (CAR) results from tumour topography or a prognostic factor for distal pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains unclear. We aimed to compare the clinicopathological data between distal pancreatectomy with en bloc CAR (DP-CAR) and distal pancreatectomy plus splenectomy (DP-S) and analyse the prognostic factors.MethodsWe retrospectively analysed clinicopathological data from 102 patients who underwent distal pancreatectomy for PDAC and the factors affecting disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Of these patients, 45 and 57 underwent DP-CAR and DP-S, respectively.ResultsDP-CAR was associated with more operative challenges than DP-S: more portomesenteric vein resections (48.9% vs. 14.0%), longer operations (320 vs. 242 min), and greater estimated blood loss (EBL) (600 vs. 200 ml). DP-CAR had larger tumours (5 vs. 4 cm), more perineural invasion (91.1% vs. 73.7%), and more microscopically positive surgical margins (20% vs. 3.5%), compared to DP-S. The major complication was clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (20.6%). The median DFS was 15.8 months and the median OS was 20.1 months. CAR was not associated with DFS or OS. EBL>700 ml, lymphovascular invasion (LVI), and adjuvant chemotherapy independently affected DFS and OS.ConclusionDP-CAR was associated with larger tumours and more surgical challenges but not with poorer DFS and OS than DP-S. CAR was more likely to result from tumour topography rather than from an adverse prognostic factor for resected distal PDAC. EBL>700 ml, LVI, and adjuvant chemotherapy were independent factors affecting the survival of patients with distal PDAC who underwent surgical resection.     

Isolated pulmonary recurrence after resection of pancreatic cancer: the effect of patient factors and treatment modalities on survival

BackgroundThe literature suggests favorable survival for patients with isolated pulmonary recurrence after resection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) as compared to other recurrence patterns. Within this cohort, it remains unclear what factors are associated with improved survival.MethodsPatients who developed pulmonary recurrence after pancreatectomy were selected from a prospective database. Predictors for post-recurrence survival (PRS) were analyzed using a multivariable Cox regression model.ResultsNinety-six patients were included. Median recurrence-free survival (RFS), PRS and overall survival (OS) were 16.3, 18.8 and 39.6 months, respectively. Further systemic treatment and/or metastasectomy (n = 64, 67%) was associated with significantly improved PRS and OS when compared to best supportive care (n = 35, 22%) (26.3 vs. 5.3 and 48.1 vs. 18.4, respectively; both P < 0.001). Patients who were able to undergo metastasectomy (n = 19) achieved a PRS and OS of 35.0 and 68.9 months, respectively. More than 5 pulmonary lesions, symptoms and CA 19-9 ≥100 U/mL at time of recurrence were predictive of decreased PRS. A recurrence-free interval of >16 months and treatment for recurrence were independently associated with improved PRS.ConclusionsIsolated pulmonary recurrence occurs in 13% of patients with recurrent PDAC and is associated with a median OS of 40 months. Aggressive treatment in highly selected patients was correlated with improved survival.     

The utilization and impact of adjuvant therapy following neoadjuvant therapy and resection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma: does more really matter?

BackgroundAlthough neoadjuvant therapy is increasingly administered to patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), the impact of additional adjuvant therapy (AT) following resection is not well defined.MethodsThe National Cancer Database (NCDB) was queried for patients who received neoadjuvant therapy followed by R0 or R1 resection for PDAC. Factors influencing survival, including the receipt of AT were evaluated.ResultsOf patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy and resection 680 (33.8%) received AT and 1331 (66.2%) did not. For R0 resected patients (n = 1800), lymphovascular invasion (HR 1.24, p = 0.034) and increasing N classification (N1: HR 1.27, p = 0.019; N2: HR 1.51, p = 0.004) were associated with increased risk of death while AT was not associated with improved overall survival (OS) (HR 0.88, p = 0.179). Following R1 resection (n = 211), AT was associated with reduced risk of death (HR 0.57, p = 0.038). Within propensity matched cohorts, median OS for patients receiving and not receiving AT was 32.1 and 30.0 months after R0 resection (p = 0.184), and 23.6 and 20.5 months after R1 resection (p = 0.005).ConclusionThis analysis demonstrated that AT did not yield OS benefit for patients who had neoadjuvant therapy and R0 resection and a statistically significant, although relatively short, improvement in OS for patients who underwent R1 resection.     

GRP78 expression and prognostic significance in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma treated with neoadjuvant therapy versus surgery first

BackgroundGlucose-regulated protein 78 (GRP78) plays an essential role in protein folding, transportation, and degradation, thus regulates ER homeostasis and promotes cell survival, proliferation and invasion. GRP78 expression in PDAC patients who received neoadjuvant therapy has not been reported.MethodsThis retrospective study of resected PDAC patients included 125 patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) and 140 patients treated with surgery first (SF). The expression of GRP78 was evaluated by immunohistochemistry on tissue microarrays and the results were correlated with clinicopathologic parameters and survival.ResultsGRP78 expression was higher in SF patients compared to NAT patients (P < 0.001). In SF cohort, the median disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) for patients with GRP78-positive tumors were 11.2 months and 25.0 months, respectively, compared to DFS of 52.1 months (P = 0.008) and OS of 69.5 months (P = 0.02) for those with GRP78-negative tumors. GRP78 expression correlated with higher frequency of recurrent/metastasis (P = 0.045). In NAT cohort, GRP78 expression correlated with shorter OS (P = 0.03), but not DFS (P = 0.08). GRP78 expression was an independent prognosticator for both DFS (P = 0.02) and OS (P = 0.049) in SF cohort and was an independent prognosticator for OS (P = 0.03), but not for DFS (P = 0.06) in NAT cohort by multivariate analysis.ConclusionsOur study showed that GRP78 expression in NAT cohort is lower than that in SF cohort. GRP78 expression correlated with shorter survival in both SF and NAT patients. Our findings suggest that targeting GRP78 may help to improve the prognosis in PDAC patients.     

Prognostic impact of simultaneous venous resections during surgery for resectable pancreatic cancer

BackgroundThe aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic impact of simultaneous venous resection during pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) for pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) that was preoperatively staged resectable according to NCCN guidelines.MethodsA retrospective analysis of 153 patients who underwent PD for PDAC was performed. Patients were divided into standard PD and PD with simultaneous vein resection (PDVR). Groups were compared to each other in terms of postoperative morbidity and mortality, disease free (DFS) and overall survival (OS).Results114 patients received PD while 39 patients received PDVR. No differences in terms of postoperative morbidity and mortality between both groups were detected. Patients in the VR group presented with a significantly shorter OS in the median (13 vs. 21 months, P = 0.011). In subgroup analysis, resection status did not influence OS in the PDVR group (R0 13 vs. R1 12 months, P = 0.471) but in the PD group (R0 23 vs. R1 14 months, P = 0.043). PDVR was a risk factor of OS in univariate but not multivariable analysis.ConclusionPDVR for PDAC preoperatively staged resectable resulted in significantly shorter OS regardless of resection status. Patients who require PDVR should be considered for adjuvant chemotherapy in addition to other oncological indications.     

Patients with hepatic oligometastatic pancreatic body/tail ductal adenocarcinoma may benefit from synchronous resection

BackgroundSynchronous resection of primary pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and liver metastases in highly selective patients is being accepted based on oncology research progress showing safe surgical outcomes with low morbidity and mortality. We also tried to determine patients who would benefit from the operation.MethodsFrom January 2012 to October 2017, 48 patients who underwent synchronous resection of primary PDAC and liver metastases were retrospectively evaluated. Twenty-three of them underwent oligometastatic synchronous resection.ResultsThe majority of synchronous resection PDAC patients underwent hepatic wedge resection, and no oligometastatic patient was treated with hemihepatectomy. The median overall survival (OS) of the synchronous resection patients was 7.8 months. Hepatic oligometastatic PDAC patients had a longer OS than that of non-oligometastatic synchronous resection patients, systemic chemotherapy patients and palliative patients (16.1 vs 6.4 months, P = 0.02; 16.1 vs 7.6 months, P = 0.02; 16.1 vs 4.3 months, P < 0.0001; respectively). Further analysis showed that localized pancreatic body/tail PDAC had a better OS in oligometastatic patients than in non-oligometastatic synchronous resection patients (16.8 months vs 7.05 months, P = 0.0004) and systemic chemotherapy patients (16.8 months vs 8 months, P = 0.003).ConclusionPatients with pancreatic body/tail PDAC with liver oligometastases can benefit from synchronous resection.     

Clinical significance of left ventricular reverse remodeling after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction

BackgroundLeft ventricular (LV) reverse remodeling (LVRR) after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AFCA) has not been fully described. This study investigated the predictors and clinical outcomes of LVRR after AFCA in patients with LV systolic dysfunction.MethodsOf 3319 consecutive patients who underwent first-time AFCA between January 2012 and October 2019, 376 with a baseline LV ejection fraction of <50% were retrospectively evaluated. They were subjected to 256-slice multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) scanning at baseline and 3 months after AFCA. The LVRR was defined as a decrease in the LV end-systolic volume of ≥15%.ResultsThe prevalence of LVRR was 83% (n = 306). Multivariate logistic regression analysis including age, body mass index, diabetic status, beta-blocker use, and LV diastolic diameter revealed that the predictors of LVRR were non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) (odds ratio, 2.68; 95% confidence interval, 1.42–5.05; p = 0.002) and absence of apparent underlying structural heart disease (4.81; 2.31–10.0; p <0.001). The prevalence of LVRR differed depending on AF recurrence pattern prior to the post-MDCT [no episode vs. paroxysmal episode (lasting <7 days) vs. persistent episode (lasting ≥7 days), 84% vs. 81% vs. 63%, respectively, p = 0.023]. During a median follow-up of 32 months, the incidence of paroxysmal form of AF recurrence was similar, whereas persistent form of AF recurrence was less frequent in patients with LVRR (10.5% vs. 18.6%, p = 0.018). Heart failure hospitalizations (2.3% vs. 15.7%, p <0.001), cardiovascular deaths (0.7% vs. 4.3%, p = 0.015), and all-cause deaths (1.3% vs. 5.7%, p = 0.018) were similarly less frequent in those with LVRR.ConclusionsLVRR after AFCA, which was predicted by non-paroxysmal AF without any apparent structural heart disease at baseline, was associated with persistent form of AF recurrence prior to the evaluation. LVRR was associated with favorable clinical outcomes.     

Survival impact of occult liver metastasis and peritoneal dissemination compared with radiologically defined distant organ metastasis in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

BackgroundCharacteristics and prognoses of patients with occult metastases (OM) of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) compared with radiologically defined metastases (RM) have been rarely reported.ObjectiveWe aimed to clarify the prognosis of OM compared with RM and to establish a treatment strategy for PDAC patients with OM.MethodsThis single-institution, retrospective study evaluated patients with unresectable PDAC between 2008 and 2018. OM was defined as abdominal metastasis that was detected by staging laparoscopy or open laparotomy but not in the initial assessment of radiological images.ResultsOM and RM were identified in 135 and 112 patients, respectively. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS), neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), tumor diameter, and rate of local unresectability were significantly lower in the OM group. Median overall survival (OS) of OM was significantly better than that of RM (13.0 vs 8.9 months, p < 0.001). In multivariate analysis of OS, ECOG PS ≥ 1 (HR 1.64, p = 0.009), NLR ≥5 (HR 1.97, p = 0.004), carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19–9 ≥1000 (HR 1.68, p = 0.001), tumor diameter ≥40 mm (HR 1.40, p = 0.027), conversion surgery (HR 0.12, p < 0.001), and multiple lines of chemotherapy (HR 0.38, p < 0.001) were independent predictors. However, type of metastasis (OM vs RM) not an independent predictor (HR 1.10, p = 0.590).ConclusionThe prognosis of PDAC with OM was relatively better than that with RM, but general and nutritional statuses, primary tumor size and CA19-9, conversion surgery and multiple lines of chemotherapy were independent predictors but not tumor burden.     

Evaluation of the significance of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage ⅠA pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

BackgroundAlthough adjuvant chemotherapy is considered a standard treatment for resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), its utility in stage ⅠA patients is unclear. We aimed to investigate the recurrence rate, surgical outcome, prognostic factors, effectiveness of adjuvant chemotherapy, and determination of groups in whom adjuvant chemotherapy is effective in patients with stage ⅠA PDAC.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed 73 patients who underwent pancreatectomy and were pathologically diagnosed with stage ⅠA PDAC between 2000 and 2018. We evaluated the relation between clinicopathological factors, recurrence rates, and outcomes such as the recurrence-free and disease-specific survival rates (RFS and DSS, respectively).ResultsThe 5-year RFS and DSS rates were 52% and 58%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, a platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) ≥ 170, prognostic nutrition index (PNI) < 47.5, and pathological grade 2 or 3 constituted risk factors for a shorter DSS (hazard ratios: 4.7, 4.6, and 4.1, respectively). Patients with 0–1 of these risk factors (low-risk group; n = 47) had significantly higher 5-year DSS rates than those with 2–3 risk factors (high-risk group; n = 26) (80% vs. 23%; P < 0.001). Patients in the low-risk group showed similar 5-year RFS rates regardless of whether they received or not adjuvant chemotherapy (75% vs 70%, respectively; P = 0.49). Contrarily, high-risk patients who underwent adjuvant chemotherapy had higher 5-year RFS rates than those who did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy (32% vs 0%; P = 0.045).ConclusionsIn stage IA PDAC, adjuvant chemotherapy seems to be effective only in a subgroup of high-risk patients.     

Preoperative serum ADAM12 levels as a stromal marker for overall survival and benefit of adjuvant therapy in patients with resected pancreatic and periampullary cancer

BackgroundWe evaluated the stroma marker A Disintegrin And Metalloprotease 12 (ADAM12) as a preoperative prognostic and treatment-predictive marker for overall survival (OS) in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and periampullary cancers.MethodsMaterials were derived from the prospective nationwide Dutch Pancreas Biobank (2015–2017). We included patients who underwent resection because of PDAC/periampullary cancer or non-invasive IPMN (control group) and had a preoperative serum sample available. ADAM12 levels were dichotomized using a pre-defined cut-off (316 pg/mL). Univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses (backward selection) were performed.ResultsMedian ADAM12 levels were 161 (IQR 79–352) pg/mL in 215 PDAC and periampullary adenocarcinomas. High ADAM12 levels (>316 pg/mL) predicted poor OS in the total group of pancreatic and periampullary adenocarcinomas (P = 0.04), but not after adjustment. In distal cholangiocarcinoma (n = 33), high ADAM12 levels predicted poor OS in univariable analysis (P = 0.02), but not in PDAC (P = 0.63). PDAC patients (n = 135) with high ADAM12 levels benefited from adjuvant treatment (median OS 27 vs 14 months, P = 0.02), whereas those with low levels did not (21 vs 21 months, P = 0.87).ConclusionHigh circulating ADAM12 levels, as a proxy for activated stroma, predict survival benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy in PDAC, requiring validation in future studies.     

Prognostic and predictive value of tumoral DNA damage repair protein expression in patients with resected pancreatic cancer

ObjectiveDNA damage repair (DDR) gene mutations gained interest in the treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer (PC) patients, but their relevance in adjuvant setting is not well characterized. We assessed the prognostic and predictive potential of tumoral expression of DDR proteins along with clinical and tumor characteristics in patients with resected PC.Patients and MethodsPatients with PC who underwent pancreatic resection in our institution between 2005 and 2017 were retrospectively retrieved. Tumoral expression of a panel of DDR proteins including BRCA1, BRCA2, ATM, and p53 with immunohistochemistry was evaluated and association with patient and tumor features as well as prognosis was assessed.Results130 patients were included in the study. The median age was 61 and 66% were males, 57% had lymph node involvement and 17% had a vascular invasion. 25 patients (19%) had thrombosis at the time of diagnosis. Median overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were 21.6 and 11.8 months, respectively. More advanced disease stage (HR: 3.67 95% CI 1.48–9.12, p = 0.005), presence of thrombosis (HR: 2.01 95% CI 1.04–3.89, p = 0.039), high BRCA1 expression (HR: 2.25, 95% CI 1.13–5.48, p = 0.023) and high post-operative CA 19–9 level (>100 IU/ml) (HR:2.61 95% CI 1.40–4.89, p = 0.003) were associated with shorter DFS. BRCA2, ATM, and p53 expression were not associated with DFS or OS. Adjuvant gemcitabine-cisplatin regimen was not associated with increased DFS or OS in the whole group, neither in low or high expressors of BRCA1, BRCA2, ATM or p53.ConclusionContrary to BRCA2, ATM, and P53, BRCA1 expression may be beneficial for prognosis in resected pancreatic cancer, while no predictive role was observed in terms of adjuvant platinum efficacy.     

Induction chemotherapy in pancreatic cancer: CA 19-9 may predict resectability and survival

BackgroundPreoperative/Neoadjuvant treatment (NT) is increasingly used in unresectable pancreatic cancer (PDAC). However, ∼40% of patients cannot be resected after NT and reliable preoperative response evaluation is currently lacking. We investigated CA 19-9 levels and their dynamics during NT for prediction of resectability and survival.MethodsWe screened our institution's database for patients who underwent exploration or resection after NT with gemcitabine-based therapy (GEM) or FOLFIRINOX (FOL). Pre- and post-NT CA 19-9, resection rate and survival were analyzed.ResultsOf 318 patients 165 (51.9%) were resected and 153 (48.1%) received exploration. In the FOL group (n = 103; 32.4%), a post-NT CA 19-9 cutoff at 91.8 U/ml had a sensitivity of 75.0% and a specificity of 76.9% for completing resection with an AUC of 0.783 in the ROC analysis (95% CI: 0.692–0.874; p < 0.001. PPV: 84.2%, NPV: 65.2%). Resected patients above the cutoff did not benefit from resection. Post-NT CA 19-9 <91.8 U/ml (OR 11.63, p < 0.001) and CA 19-9 ratio of <0.4 (OR 5.77, p = 0.001) were independent predictors for resectability in FOL patients.DiscussionCA 19-9 levels after neoadjuvant treatment with FOLFIRINOX predict resectability and survival of PDAC more accurately than dynamic values and should be incorporated into response evaluation and surgical decision-making.