Assessing capacity in suspected cases of self-neglect

Self-neglect is a serious and burgeoning public health challenge representing the most common problem faced by Adult Protective Services agencies. Among older adults who are vulnerable to self-neglect, the capacity to make decisions may remain intact. However, the capacity to identify and extract oneself from harmful situations, circumstances, or relationships may be diminished. A key ethical and clinical branch point in identifying older adults at risk for self-neglect involves determining whether the individual can both make and implement decisions regarding personal needs, health, and safety. The Articulate --> Demonstrate method is a practical and efficient way to screen capacity in the setting of suspected self-neglect. Once self-neglect has been identified, common clinical interventions can be targeted to the diagnosed deficits that foster vulnerability to neglect in older adults.     

Cardiology and cost control: the ethical challenge for the new millennium

Government interventions in the health care sector threaten the traditional role of physicians, since they are increasingly forced to consider the cost of medical care when making decisions on behalf of their patients. To prepare themselves for this ethical challenge and to actively participate in the debate about cost containment, physicians need to understand how health economists and politicians view the problem of rising medical costs. This review summarizes some essential facts and findings of the health economics literature that provide the rationale for different approaches to cost containment. The effects of rapidly growing health care cost on the economy are discussed, and improvement of medical technology is identified as the driving force behind this growth. The different policy instruments, which can be employed for cost containment, are explained against this background with an emphasis on Managed Care and global budgets. The outlined concepts are finally discussed in the context of the current debate about the proposed cost containment legislation in Germany.     

Risk factors for harm in cognitively impaired seniors who live alone: a prospective study

OBJECTIVES: To identify risk factors for harm due to self-neglect or behaviors related to disorientation in cognitively impaired seniors who live alone that can be used in primary care. DESIGN: Inception cohort followed prospectively for 18 months. SETTING: Participants were referred by their primary care physicians and community service agencies or were patients of several medical units of a large teaching hospital. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred thirty-nine community-residing participants, aged 65 and older who scored less than 131 on the Dementia Rating Scale and lived alone. MEASUREMENTS: Baseline Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE); a social resources questionnaire; presence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), cerebrovascular disease, diabetes mellitus, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and medication use were examined as predictors of incident harm. Informants and primary care physicians provided information about the nature of any harm at 3-month intervals over an 18-month period. An incident of harm was included if it occurred as the result of self-neglect or behaviors related to disorientation, resulted in physical injury or property loss or damage, and required emergency community interventions. RESULTS: Based on the consensual agreement of four raters, 21.6% had an incident of harm. The proportional hazards model was highly significant (P<.001) and supported by bootstrapping estimates. Four variables were significantly predictive of time to incident harm: perception of fewer social resources, poorer performance on MMSE, presence of COPD, and presence of cerebrovascular disorders. CONCLUSION: Predictors of incident harm can be identified in the primary care setting and provide direction for the early identification of those at highest risk. Validation of findings with a new cohort is necessary.     

Could Self‐Neglect in Older Adults Be a Geriatric Syndrome?

Self-neglect in older adults is a complex phenomenon characterized by inattention to health and hygiene, typically stemming from an inability or unwillingness to access potentially remediating services. Some aspects of self-neglect clinically resemble geriatric syndromes (e.g., falling, incontinence). The literature on self-neglect was comprehensively reviewed and its quality evaluated in the context of considering its candidacy for a geriatric syndrome. MEDLINE (1966-2004) was searched using self-neglect as a keyword. Using a "snowball" sampling strategy, associated terms (e.g., Diogenes' syndrome) were combined, selecting relevant papers and frequently cited references, assessing each one using specific criteria. Its candidacy for consideration for a geriatric syndrome was assessed based on the quality of data in four domains: multifactorial etiology, shared risk factors with other geriatric syndromes, association with functional decline, and association with increased mortality. The 54 articles reviewed included 24 case series, 13 theoretical articles, 11 observational studies, and six reviews; these were of highly variable methodological quality. The strongest evidence that self-neglect may be a geriatric syndrome includes its often multifactorial etiology, its clear independent association with increased mortality, and the fact that two other geriatric syndromes (cognitive impairment and depression) are risk factors for self-neglect. Self-neglect in older adults is a prevalent problem that appears to have at least some features of a geriatric syndrome. Insofar as the concept of geriatric syndrome has been a useful clinical and research paradigm to create interventions for vulnerable older adults, and no such strategies are available for this vexing and understudied clinical problem, future research is warranted in this area.     

Der Abbau von Überversorgung als Teil der ärztlichen Berufsethik

Background

The topics of rationing and priority setting have been increasingly discussed over the past 5 years in Germany by physicians together with other health care stakeholders. The topic of overuse, however, has not been discussed with similar intensity and publicity.

Objectives

This analysis paper outlines the relationships and differences between efficiency, priority setting, and rationing. Furthermore, it argues why and how German physicians should address the topic of overuse with more transparency and intensity.

Discussion

Efforts of physicians to rationalize health care mainly comprise efforts to decrease overuse. The identification of important areas of overuse includes the prioritization of indications and medical interventions. Rationing health care can be unavoidable, for example, because other strategies such as rationalization, price regulation or disinvestments are not sufficient to avoid scarcity of financial resources. In such a case, rationing health care is unavoidable and, therefore, cannot be unethical per se. However, the debate on rationing becomes more legitimate if physicians demonstrate sufficient efforts to reduce overuse sufficiently. The Choosing Wisely initiative in the USA is outlined as one interesting option of how physicians could demonstrate and prove such efforts. Additional and more effective strategies to decrease overuse might be possible.

Conclusion

German physicians demand a more explicit communication within their communities and together with other stakeholders on the appropriateness of existing and potential future activities to decrease overuse. Such initiatives to avoid and decrease overuse should primarily be motivated through the ethical principle of beneficence, while the effect of cost containment should be considered as a welcomed side effect.     

The therapeutic effects of the physician-older patient relationship: Effective communication with vulnerable older patients

There is growing evidence that the outcomes of health care for seniors are dependent not only upon patients’ physical health status and the administration of care for their biomedical needs, but also upon care for patients’ psychosocial needs and attention to their social, economic, cultural, and psychological vulnerabilities. Even when older patients have appropriate access to medical services, they also need effective and empathic communication as an essential part of their treatment. Older patients who are socially isolated, emotionally vulnerable, and economically disadvantaged are particularly in need of the social, emotional, and practical support that sensitive provider-patient communication can provide. In this review paper, we examine the complexities of communication between physicians and their older patients, and consider some of the particular challenges that manifest in providers’ interactions with their older patients, particularly those who are socially isolated, suffering from depression, or of minority status or low income. This review offers guidelines for improved physician-older patient communication in medical practice, and examines interventions to coordinate care for older patients on multiple dimensions of a biopsychosocial model of health care.     

The Physician as Rationer: Uncertainty about the Physician's Role Obligations

Although the need to ration health care is increasingly accepted, the need for bedside physicians to participate in it is not. There are three common perspectives on physicians' roles in rationing: one is that bedside physicians should advocate fully for their patients and eschew rationing; another is that some rationing is permissible but should be imposed from outside the patient-physician relationship; the third is that bedside physicians should simultaneously advocate for their individual patients and make bedside rationing decisions that incorporate societal interests. The first two conceptualizations are at odds with empirical evidence that physicians do ration at the bedside and the idea that doing so may be a necessary part of efforts to control costs, whereas the third raises difficult ethical questions about the extent of physicians' obligations to advocate maximally for their individual patients.     

Physician and public opinions on quality of health care and the problem of medical errors

BACKGROUND: The 1999 Institute of Medicine report on medical errors proposed major changes to the health care system and gained widespread media attention, yet there is limited information on physician or public opinion regarding recommendations from that report. METHODS: Mail survey of 1000 Colorado physicians (n = 594) and 1000 national physicians (n = 304), and telephone survey of 500 Colorado households to assess agreement with several proposals and conclusions from the 1999 Institute of Medicine report. RESULTS: Most physicians believed that reduction of medical errors should be a national priority (69.7% of Colorado physicians). However, physicians were much less likely than the public to believe that quality of care is a problem (29.1% vs 67.6%; P<.001) or that a national agency is needed to address the problem of medical errors (24.1% vs 59.8%; P<.001). Uniformly, physicians believed that fear of medical malpractice is a barrier to reporting of errors and that greater legal safeguards are necessary for a mandatory reporting system to be successful. Nearly all physicians (92.9%) believed that more training in how to handle medical errors is needed, and 60.1% agreed that it is difficult to differentiate errors due to negligence from unintended errors. CONCLUSIONS: There appears to be widespread concern among physicians regarding medical errors, but only a minority in this survey believed that the problem is as significant as the Institute of Medicine and the public believe it to be. Our results suggest that physicians see several barriers to successful error reduction including difficulty defining errors, the need for more training in handling errors, and fear of malpractice litigation. Addressing these barriers will be a necessary step to increasing physician support for many of the changes proposed by the Institute of Medicine.     

Smoking behavior, cessation techniques, and the health decision model

The magnitude of the problem of smoking challenges health providers to persuade patients of the importance of trying to quit. Smoking behavior and cessation techniques are discussed in terms of the health decision model, a third-generation model combining health beliefs, decision analysis, and behavioral decision theory. This review suggests the need for physicians to emphasize factors such as health beliefs, self-efficacy, social support, and reduction of stress in smoking cessation efforts. Patients experiencing symptoms, particularly relating to the lungs or heart, may have stronger health beliefs and are clearly more likely to quit smoking. In the absence of a clear-cut advantage for any particular smoking cessation technique, physicians should provide advice about smoking as a regular part of every patient visit.     

How are patients’ specific ambulatory care experiences related to trust, satisfaction, and considering changing physicians?

CONTEXT: Few data are available regarding the consequences of patients' problems with interpersonal aspects of medical care. OBJECTIVE: To assess the relationships between outpatient problem experiences and patients' trust in their physicians, ratings of their physicians, and consideration of changing physicians. We classified as problem experiences patients' reports that their physician does not always 1) give them enough time to explain the reason for the visit, 2) give answers to questions that are understandable, 3) take enough time to answer questions, 4) ask about how their family or living situation affects their health, 5) give as much medical information as they want, or 6) involve them in decisions as much as they want. DESIGN: Telephone survey during 1997. PARTICIPANTS: Patients (N=2,052; 58% response) insured by a large national health insurer. MEASUREMENTS: Patient trust, overall ratings of physicians, and having considered changing physicians. RESULTS: Most patients (78%) reported at least 1 problem experience. In multivariable analyses, each problem experience was independently associated with lower trust (all P <.001) and 5 of 6 with lower overall ratings (P <.001). Three problem experiences were independently related to considering changing physicians: physicians not always giving answers to questions that are understandable (odds ratio [OR], 2.0; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.3 to 3.0), not always taking enough time to answer questions (OR, 3.3; 95% CI, 2.2 to 5.2), and not always giving enough medical information (OR, 4.0; 95% CI, 2.4 to 6.6). CONCLUSIONS: Problem experiences in the ambulatory setting are strongly related to lower trust. Several are also associated with lower overall ratings and with considering changing physicians, particularly problems related to communication of health information. Efforts to improve patients' experiences may promote more trusting relationships and greater continuity and therefore should be a priority for physicians, educators, and health care organizations.     

Elderly long-term care in Korea

The national mandatory elderly long-term care insurance (LTCI) was established in Korea in July 2008. One year after introduction of the LTCI, 5.2% of the elderly population aged 65 years and older were beneficiaries. The applicant's caregiver(s) submit an application form along with a statement of a doctor's medical opinion to the National Health Insurance Corporation, after which one or two National Health Insurance Corporation staff members (either a nurse or social worker) visit the applicant's house to evaluate their physical and mental status.The majority of beneficiaries are reported to have one or more chronic conditions. The problem is that national LTCI and national medical insurance are separate now in Korea. However, it is almost impossible to separate long-term care and health care. Even though long-term care facilities contract physicians or hospitals to have physicians visit care facilities regularly, the reward for these physicians is not satisfactory and sometimes they work without pay. Furthermore, contracted physicians cannot properly manage the elderly in long-term care facilities because they are not legally allowed to provide any medical services to long-term care facilities except for prescribing medicine.The efficient linkage of long-term care and health care is a big task in Korea that is under discussion by full-time physicians working for long-term care facilities.     

Quality of care: do we care?

The quality of U.S. health care must improve. Practicing physicians need to become involved in generating new knowledge about what does and does not work in medical practice. Physicians might, for example, participate in building national databases on chronic and acute conditions using data from their patients or might help to enroll patients in cohort studies or experimental trials. Furthermore, our knowledge is now sufficient to support a substantial investment of funds in improving what physicians now do in medical practice and in developing publicly available standards of medical practice. Such standards or guidelines could be used by both physicians and patients as part of an explicit process to assess the medical appropriateness of expensive or dangerous procedures before they are done. In addition, the competence with which care is delivered also needs to be measured. Both of these assessments should be used prospectively by physicians to help patients choose the referral source that will maximize their preferences.     

The relationship between hospital or operator volume and outcomes of coronary patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions

Summary The relationship between volume and outcome in medicine has been intensively investigated in the last few decades. The large amount of accumulated data demonstrates that for many surgical or non-surgical procedures and medical conditions, patients being treated in high-volume hospitals or by high-volume physicians have lower mortality rates and better quality of life compared to those treated by low-volume hospitals or by low-volume physicians. Although the degree of the relationship between high volume and better outcome varies, it is persistent across a wide range of procedures and conditions.Percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) have an important impact on public health, given the frequency of coronary heart disease for which these procedures are performed. Studies carried out before and after the advent of stents on the relationship between volume and outcome for PCIs have almost consistently reported that performance of PCIs in high-volume institutions or by high-volume operators is associated with improved outcomes for patients, regardless of the specific indication for PCI.For those procedures for which a relationship between high volume and better outcome has been clearly demonstrated, patients as well as their referring physicians should be informed that patients can benefit both in terms of reduced mortality and improved quality of life if they are treated by high-volume health care providers. Consequently, for these procedures, a health care policy aiming at their concentration in high-volume institutions should be strongly considered.     

Physicians' attitudes toward mandatory workplace urine drug testing.

BACKGROUND--Workplace drug testing programs are being increasingly implemented in both the public and private sectors, and health care workers are unlikely to be excluded from such testing. METHODS--A survey of attending physicians' attitudes toward mandatory hospital-based urine drug testing was undertaken in a medium-sized, midwestern county. RESULTS--Seventy-four percent (272/368) of the sample responded. Seventy-two percent of the subjects believed physician drug use to be a minor or nonexistent problem, 38% lacked confidence in the testing procedure, and 60% believed that testing infringed on the physician's right to privacy; yet 87% would submit to testing if required by a hospital. Forty-five percent of respondents agreed with the policy of mandatory testing for physicians with hospital privileges, 34% disagreed, and 21% were uncertain. Respondents were more supportive of mandatory testing of other health care and non-health care occupations than for themselves. Support for testing was greatest for illicit drugs. If implemented, physicians preferred mandatory testing to be performed by hospital medical staff independent of hospital administration. CONCLUSIONS--Further education and discussion within the physician community appears to be necessary before widespread mandatory workplace urine drug testing of physicians is implemented.     

Reducing Racial Bias Among Health Care Providers: Lessons from Social-Cognitive Psychology

The paper sets forth a set of evidence-based recommendations for interventions to combat unintentional bias among health care providers, drawing upon theory and research in social cognitive psychology. Our primary aim is to provide a framework that outlines strategies and skills, which can be taught to medical trainees and practicing physicians, to prevent unconscious racial attitudes and stereotypes from negatively influencing the course and outcomes of clinical encounters. These strategies and skills are designed to: l) enhance internal motivation to reduce bias, while avoiding external pressure; 2) increase understanding about the psychological basis of bias; 3) enhance providers’ confidence in their ability to successfully interact with socially dissimilar patients; 4) enhance emotional regulation skills; and 5) improve the ability to build partnerships with patients. We emphasize the need for programs to provide a nonthreatening environment in which to practice new skills and the need to avoid making providers ashamed of having racial, ethnic, or cultural stereotypes. These recommendations are also intended to provide a springboard for research on interventions to reduce unintentional racial bias in health care.     

Health-related quality of life: a primer for gastroenterologists

The evolution of health care has required physicians to evaluate more critically the impact of interventions on their patients' well-being. Prior clinical interventions focused primarily on biochemical and histological endpoints. These outcomes frequently were tenuously linked to patient benefit. Recently there has been a movement toward patient-oriented outcomes, including health-related quality of life (HRQL). The medical literature now frequently describes the effects of therapies on HRQL. Gastroenterologists need to understand the concepts behind HRQL and the use and utility of the various instruments employed to measure this outcome. The purpose of this article is: 1) to define the concept of health-related quality of life (HRQL); 2) to assess when measurement of HRQL can guide clinical decision-making; 3) to describe the desired properties of an HRQL instrument; and 4) to distinguish types of HRQL instruments. We discuss the varied definitions of HRQL and the clinical scenarios in which they are important. The psychometric properties of HRQL instruments, including validity, reliability, responsiveness, sensitivity, and coverage are defined and discussed. The types of instruments such as health profile, time trade-off, and standard gamble are contrasted. Finally, we compare generic and disease-specific instruments regarding their uses, strengths, and weaknesses. HRQL reflects patients' perceptions of disease and its impact on health status. It is becoming an increasingly important endpoint in therapeutic trials. By understanding its components and how it can meaningfully be measured, gastroenterologists may be better able to optimize the benefit patients receive from their medical interventions.     

Putting prevention into daily practice

The future holds promise for expanding and effectively implementing preventive therapies to reduce cardiovascular risk. These preventive concepts are supported by sound science and strong evidence from multiple randomized, clinical trials. To be successful, the health care system must continue to provide financial resources to support physicians and other health care providers in preventive cardiovascular efforts. In the long run, this support should result in a decrease in the need for expensive high-technology, acute-care interventions. Health care provider teams involving physicians, nurses, and other providers will be necessary to ensure the success of these measures, and they must be integrated into the expanding network of inpatient and outpatient delivery systems. Finally, programs to train fellows, residents, and medical students in preventive skills will provide the basis for expanded application of cardiovascular risk therapies and will contribute to the ultimate widespread success in decreasing the morbidity and mortality from cardiovascular disease.     

Knowledge of health professionals about the prevention of cancer the cervix. Alternatives to medical education

OBJECTIVE: Several studies have shown the importance of health care professionals as predictors of the use of cervical cancer screening (CCS). MATERIAL AND METHODS: A cross-sectional study of 520 health care professionals in the State of Morelos during 1998, in order to evaluate and quantify their level of knowledge on the impact, etiology, screening, diagnosis and treatment of cervical cancer. A 1 to 10 scale questionnaire was given, and the sample included family medicine specialists, general practitioners, specialist and general nurses, and social workers. Statistical analysis included analysis of variance and 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: A knowledge mean of 4.74 (95% CI 4.57-4.88) was observed for a scale of 10; specialist physicians scored higher (mean 5.21, 95% CI 4.81-5.60) than social workers (mean 3.07, 95% CI 2.31-3.82). Periodicity of the Pap test in most cases was less than 1 year and there was poor consensus about the age period during which the Pap test should be obtained. The knowledge level was lower when trying to identify etiologic aspects and treatment perspectives. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study show that, besides the improvement of undergraduate academic programs, it is necessary to improve educational interventions for health care professionals through the updating, recycling, training, health education, and continuing medical education, among others, to promote professional competence and thus improve the quality of medical care.     

Physicians' and families' perspectives on the medical management of dementia

The role of physicians in the long-term management of patients with the primary diagnosis of progressive dementia was investigated by surveying the opinions of 57 physicians and 47 family members. Respondents were asked to evaluate the difficulty and helpfulness of various activities physicians perform in the diagnosis, treatment, and management of patients with dementia. Both physicians and families rated the diagnostic services provided by physicians very highly. Although families found physicians' explanations of the diagnosis and prognosis extremely helpful, physicians reported this as an area of difficulty. Physicians and families expressed considerable frustration with the limited medical treatments and interventions for the relief of symptoms associated with dementia. Despite the acknowledged sensitivity of physicians to the social-psychological consequences of dementia, physicians were found to be least helpful in addressing these issues, either directly or through referral to allied health and social services. This study outlines areas of physician education that need improvement and calls for development of an interdisciplinary network of services for the biopsychosocial management of dementia.