Appropriate treatment strategies improve survival of hepatocellular carcinoma patients with portal vein tumor thrombus

AIM:To evaluate the survival benefits of different treatment strategies for hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC)patients with portal vein tumor thrombus(PVTT)and to determine the prognosis factors.METHODS:Between 2007 and 2009,338 HCC patients treated for PVTT were retrospectively studied.The patients were divided into 4 groups that underwent different treatments:the conservative treatment group(n=75),the transarterial chemoembolization(TACE)group(n=86),the hepatic resection group(n=90),and the hepatic resection associated with postoperative TACE group(n=87).Survival rates were determined using the Kaplan-Meier method and differences between the groups were identified through log-rankanalysis.Cox’s proportional hazard model was used to identify the risk factors for survival.RESULTS:The mean survival periods for patients in the conservative treatment,TACE,hepatic resection and hepatic resection associated with postoperative TACE groups were 3.8,7,8.2 and 15.1 mo,respectively.Significant differences were observed in the survival rates.For the surgical resection associated with postoperative TACE group,the survival rates after 1,2 and3 years were 49%,37%and 19%,respectively.These results were significantly higher than those of the other groups(P<0.05).Meanwhile,the 1,2 and 3 year survival rates for the surgical resection group were 28%,20%and 15%,whereas those for the TACE group were17.5%,0%and 0%,respectively.These values significantly increased after hepatic resection compared with those after TACE(P<0.05).CONCLUSION:Surgical resection is the most effective therapeutic strategy for HCC patients with PVTT and results in high hepatic functional reserve.For patients who can tolerate the procedure,postoperative TACE is necessary to prevent recurrence and prolong the survival period.     

Efficacy of hepatic resection vs transarterial chemoembolization for solitary huge hepatocellular carcinoma

AIM: To compare the efficacy of hepatic resection (HR) and transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) for patients with solitary huge (≥ 10 cm) hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).METHODS: Records were retrospectively analyzed of 247 patients with solitary huge HCC, comprising 180 treated by HR and 67 by TACE. Long-term overall survival (OS) was compared between the two groups using the Kaplan-Meier method, and independent predictors of survival were identified by multivariate analysis. These analyses were performed using all patients in both groups and/or 61 pairs of propensity score-matched patients from the two groups.RESULTS: OS at 5 years was significantly higher in the HR group than the TACE group, across all patients (P = 0.002) and across propensity score-matched pairs (36.4% vs 18.2%, P = 0.039). The two groups showed similar postoperative mortality and morbidity. Multivariate analysis identified alpha-fetoprotein ≥ 400 ng/mL, presence of vascular invasion and TACE treatment as independent predictors of poor OS.CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that HR can be safe and more effective than TACE for patients with solitary huge HCC.     

Development of a prognostic scoring system for resectable hepatocellular carcinoma

AIMTo develop a prognostic scoring system for overall survival (OS) of patients undergoing liver resection (LR) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).METHODSConsecutive patients who underwent curative LR for HCC between 2000 and 2013 were identified. The series was randomly divided into a training and a validation set. A multivariable Cox model for OS was fitted to the training set. The beta coefficients derived from the Cox model were used to define a prognostic scoring system for OS. The survival stratification was then tested, and the prognostic scoring system was compared with the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL)/American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) surgical criteria by means of Harrell’s C statistics.RESULTSA total of 917 patients were considered. Five variables independently correlated with post-LR survival: Model for End-stage Liver Disease score, hepatitis C virus infection, number of nodules, largest diameter and vascular invasion. Three risk classes were identified, and OS for the three risk classes was significantly different both in the training (P < 0.0001) and the validation set (P = 0.0002). Overall, 69.4% of patients were in the low-risk class, whereas only 37.8% were eligible to surgery according to EASL/AASLD. Survival of patients in the low-risk class was not significantly different compared with surgical indication for EASL/AASLD guidelines (77.2 mo vs 82.5 mo respectively, P = 0.22). Comparison of Harrell’s C statistics revealed no significant difference in predictive power between the two systems (-0.00999, P = 0.667).CONCLUSIONThis study established a new prognostic scoring system that may stratify HCC patients suitable for surgery, expanding surgical eligibility with respect to EASL/AASLD criteria with no harm on survival.     

The impact of portal vein tumor thrombus on long-term survival after liver resection for primary hepatic malignancy

BackgroundThe aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT) on the prognosis of patients undergoing liver resection (LR) for primary liver malignancies (PLC).MethodsThe recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) for patients undergoing LR with and without PVTT for three primary liver malignancies, including hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) and hepato-cholangio carcinoma (CHC) were compared using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression analysis.ResultsIn total, 3775 patients with PLC who underwent LR were included in this study. The incidence of PVTT in patients undergoing LR with HCC, IHC and CHC were 46%, 20%, and 17%, respectively. The median RFS and OS were significantly better for patients with HCC as compared to ICC or CHC (16 vs 11 vs 13 months; 21 vs 16 vs 18 months, respectively; P < 0.001). However, the presence of PVTT resulted in similarly poor RFS and OS in these 3 subgroups of patients (9 vs 8 vs 8 months, P = 0.062; 14 vs 13 vs 12 months, respectively, P = 0.052).ConclusionAlthough the prognosis of patients with PLC varied by histological subtype, once PVTT occurred, survival outcomes after LR were similarly poor across all three subgroups.     

Factors influencing the short-term and long-term survival of hepatocellular carcinoma patients with portal vein tumor thrombosis who underwent chemoembolization

BACKGROUNDThe factors affecting the short-term and long-term prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT) receiving transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) are still unclear.AIMTo clarify the predictors correlated with the short-term and long-term survival of HCC patients with PVTT who underwent TACE.METHODSThe medical records of 181 HCC patients with PVTT who underwent TACE at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University from January 2015 to July 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. We explored the short-term and long-term prognostic factors by comparing the preoperative indicators of patients who died and survived within 3 mo and 12 mo after TACE. Multivariate analyses were conducted using logistic regression. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (area under curve) was used to evaluate the predictive ability of the factors related to the short-term and long-term prognosis.RESULTSThe median survival time was 4.8 mo (range: 2.5-8.85 mo). The 3 mo, 6 mo, and 12 mo survival rates were 68.5%, 38.7%, and 15.5%, respectively. In multivariable analysis, total bilirubin, sex, and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) were closely linked to short-term survival. When AST ≥ 87 U/L and total bilirubin ≥ 16.15 µmol/L, the 3-mo survival rate after TACE was reduced significantly (P < 0.05). AST had the best predictive ability, followed by total bilirubin, while sex had the worst predictive ability for short-term survival area under curve: 0.763 (AST) vs 0.707 (total bilirubin) vs 0.554 (sex)]. The long-term survival outcome was significantly better in patients with a single lesion than in those with ≥ three lesions (P = 0.009). Patients with massive block HCC had a worse long-term survival than patients with nodular and diffuse HCC (P = 0.001).CONCLUSIONAST, total bilirubin, and sex are independent factors associated with short-term survival. The number of tumors and the gross pathological type of tumor are related to the long-term outcome.     

Adjuvant transarterial chemoembolization for patients after curative resection of hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of adjuvant transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) after curative hepatectomy in improving the survival of patients with primary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Methods: MEDLINE, Embase and the Cochrane Library were searched for randomized or nonrandomized studies comparing postoperative adjuvant TACE with curative resection alone. Meta-analysis was performed after converting time-event data into a hazard ratio (HR), using an inverse diversity model.

Results: Eight randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 12 retrospective studies matched the selection criteria, thereby including 3191 patients (779 in RCT, 2412 in observational studies) for the meta-analysis. The meta-analysis showed that receiving adjuvant TACE was associated with improved overall survival (OS, ln[HR]?=?0.70, 95%CI: 0.63–0.78, p?<?.001) and recurrence-free survival (RFS, ln[HR]?=?0.69, 95%CI: 0.63–0.76, p?<?.001) after curative hepatectomies. The results of observational studies were consistent with those of RCTs. Furthermore, meta-regression was utilized to detect study-level factors associated with treatment outcome. It revealed that overall survival was similar among patients treated with various combinations of chemotherapeutic drugs. Subgroup analyses demonstrated that repeated TACE interventions do not provide a higher survival benefit compared with a single course, and patients with a single tumor or tumor size?≥5cm might stand to benefit the most from adjuvant TACE therapy.

Conclusions: This meta-analysis demonstrated that postoperative adjuvant TACE could achieve higher OS and RFS than surgical resection alone. However, these results need to be validated through further high-quality clinical studies.     

Clinical outcome of 251 patients with extrahepatic metastasis at initial diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma: Does transarterial chemoembolization improve survival in these patients?

Background and Aims: The therapeutic efficacy of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) has not been evaluated in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with extrahepatic metastasis. We investigated the efficacy of TACE with/without systemic chemotherapy (s‐chemo) in these patients. Methods: We performed a survival analysis of consecutive HCC patients with extrahepatic metastasis, diagnosed at initial presentation according to treatment modality after stratification, using the Child–Pugh classification and intrahepatic HCC T stage, retrospectively. Results: Between 2005 and 2007, 251 patients were newly diagnosed with HCC involving extrahepatic metastasis at our institution. Among those, 226 were classified as Child–Pugh A–B and the other 25, Child‐Pugh C. Within the Child–Pugh A–B group, repeated TACE or transarterial chemoinfusion (TACI) was performed with/without s‐chemo in 171 patients. Eight of 226 received s‐chemo alone, and 47, conservative management (CM) alone. The median survival time of patients treated with TACE/TACI with s‐chemo, TACE/TACI alone, and CM was 10, 5, and 2.9 months in patients classified as Child–Pugh A and T3‐stage HCC (TACE/TACI with s‐chemo vs CM, P = 0.0354; TACE/TACI alone vs CM, P = 0.0553) and 7.1, 2.6, and 1.6 months in Child–Pugh B and T3‐stage patients, respectively (TACE/TACI with s‐chemo vs CM, P = 0.0097; TACE/TACI alone vs CM, P < 0.0001). Individual treatment with TACE/TACI or sorafenib showed independent prognostic significance in the multivariate analysis. Conclusion: Repeated TACE could show significant survival benefits in metastatic HCC patients with conserved liver function and intrahepatic HCC T3 stage. The survival data of our study could be used as a historical control for TACE monotherapy in future clinical trials evaluating combination treatments containing TACE in these patients.     

Preoperative transarterial chemoembolization for barcelona clinic liver cancer stage A/B hepatocellular carcinoma beyond the milan criteria: a propensity score matching analysis

BackgroundDebate continues about the benefits of preoperative transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) for treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This study aimed to assess the impact of preoperative TACE on long-term outcomes after curative resection for HCC beyond the Milan criteria.MethodsPatients who underwent HCC resection exceeding the Milan criteria without macrovascular invasion between 2015 and 2018 were identified (n = 393). Short- and long-term outcomes were compared between patients who underwent preoperative TACE and patients who did not before and after propensity score matching (PSM). Factors associated with recurrence after resection were analyzed.Results100 patients (25.4%) underwent preoperative TACE. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were comparable with patients who underwent primary liver resection. 7 patients (7.0%) achieved total necrosis with better RFS compared with patients who had an incomplete response to TACE (P=0.041). PSM created 73 matched patient pairs. In the PSM cohort, preoperative TACE improved RFS (P=0.002) and OS (P=0.003). The maximum preoperatively diagnosed tumor diameter (HR 3.230, 95% CI: 1.116–9.353; P=0.031) and hepatitis B infection (HR 2.905, 95%CI: 1.281–6.589; P=0.011) were independently associated with favorable RFS after HCC resection.ConclusionPreoperative TACE made no significant difference to perioperative complications and was correlated with an improved prognosis after surgical resection for patients with HCC beyond the Milan criteria.     

Does postoperative adjuvant transarterial chemoembolization benefit for all patients with hepatocellular carcinoma combined with microvascular invasion: a meta-analysis

Purpose: To evaluate the clinical efficacy of postoperative adjuvant transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients combined with microvascular invasion (MVI).

Patients and methods: Eligible studies were searched by PubMed, MedLine, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, from 1st January 2000 to 31st December 2018, comparing the overall survival (OS) rates and disease-free survival (DFS) rates between postoperative adjuvant TACE and operation only for HCC patients with MVI. Hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was used to determine the effect size.

Results: Eight studies were enrolled in this meta-analysis, including 774 patients in the postoperative adjuvant TACE group and 856 patients in the operation only group. The pooled HR for the OS and DFS rates were significantly different between the postoperative adjuvant TACE group and the operation only group (HR 0.57, 95%CI 0.48?～?0.68, p?<?.00001; HR 0.66, 95%CI 0.58?～?0.74, p?<?.00001; respectively). However, in the subgroup analysis stratified by proportion of multiple-nodules, no significant differences were observed in the pooled HR for the OS/DFS rates between the postoperative adjuvant TACE group and the operation only group (HR 0.83, 95%CI 0.60?～?1.13, p?=?.23; HR 0.76, 95%CI 0.41?～?1.40, p?=?.37; respectively).

Conclusions: Postoperative adjuvant TACE will benefit patients with HCC and MVI, but not for multiple-HCC with MVI. However, more high-quality studies are warranted to validate the conclusion.     

Adjuvant transarterial chemoembolization for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma after radical hepatectomy: a real world study

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the clinical value of the adjuvant transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after radical resection, and identify the potential beneficiaries.

Methods: Patients were identified through the primary liver cancer big data (PLCBD) between 2012 and 2015. Overall survival (OS) between adjuvant TACE group and non-TACE was evaluated by Kaplan-Meier before and after propensity scoring match (PSM). Subgroup analysis was conducted stratified by risk factors.

Results: A total of 2066 HCC patients receiving radical resection were identified. Patients with multiple tumors, tumor diameter >5?cm, satellite, and advanced stage were more likely to accept adjuvant TACE. Before PSM, the 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates in the TACE group and non-TACE group were 89%, 58%, 17%, and 88%, 53%, 13% (p?=?.43), respectively. While, the corresponding rates were 89%, 58%, 17%, and 86%, 49%, 11%, (p?=?.038), respectively after 1:1 PSM. In addition, patients were found to significantly benefit from adjuvant TACE if they had age ≥50?years, no cirrhosis, AFP ≤ 200?ng/ml, surgical margin <1?cm, tumor diameter >5?cm, no capsule, no satellite, or CN stage Ib/IIa (all p?<?.05), but patients with age < 50?years, tumor size ≤5?cm, or CN stage Ia were found to significantly benefit from radical resection in DFS (all p?<?.05).

Conclusion: Currently, we concluded that not all of patients with HCC would benefit from adjuvant TACE. Patients with age ≥50?years, tumor size >5?cm, or CN stage Ib/IIa were strongly recommended to receive adjuvant TACE.     

Complete response with sorafenib and transcatheter arterial chemoembolization in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma

Patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC) showing portal vein tumor thrombosis(PVTT) have an extremely poor prognosis. According to treatment guidelines, the only option for HCC patients with PVTT is sorafenib chemotherapy. However, in Asia, various treatments have been attempted and possible prolongation of overall survival has been repeatedly reported. We herein report the first case of a patient with an initially unresectable advanced HCC with PVTT who underwent curative hepatectomy after sorafenib and transcatheter arterial chemoembolization(TACE) showing complete histological response. Two months after induction with sorafenib, a significant decrease in serum alpha-fetoprotein level was observed and computed tomography imaging showed a significant decrease in tumor size. Because of remaining PVTT, TACE and curative resection were performed. The combination of sorafenib and TACE may be an effective treatment for HCC patients with PVTT.     

Comparative effectiveness of traditional chemoembolization with or without sorafenib for hepatocellular carcinoma

AIM: To compare the overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) with associated adverse events (AE) in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) + sorafenib vs TACE alone. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study we collected data on all consecutive patients with a diagnosis of unresectable HCC between 2007 and 2011 who had been treated with TACE + sorafenib or TACE alone. We hypothesized that the combination therapy is superior to TACE alone in improving the survival in these patients. Data extracted included patient’s demographics, etiology of liver disease, histology of HCC, stage of liver disease with respect to model of end stage liverdisease score and Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) classification and Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging for HCC. Computed tomography scan findings, alpha fetoprotein levels, number of treatments and related AE were also recorded and analyzed. RESULTS: Of the 43 patients who met inclusion criteria, 13 were treated with TACE + sorafenib and 30 with TACE alone. There was no significant difference in median survival: 20.6 mo (95%CI: 13.4-38.4) for the TACE + sorafenib and 18.3 mo (95%CI: 11.8-32.9) for the TACE alone (P = 0.72). There were also no statistically significant differences between groups in OS (HR = 0.82, 95%CI: 0.38-1.77; P = 0.61), PFS (HR = 0.93, 95%CI: 0.45-1.89; P = 0.83), and treatment-related toxicities (P = 0.554). CTP classification and BCLC staging for HCC were statistically significant (P = 0.001, P = 0.04 respectively) in predicting the survival in patients with HCC. The common AE observed were abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting and mild elevation of liver enzymes. CONCLUSION: Combination therapy with TACE + sorafenib is safe and equally effective as TACE alone in patients with unresectable HCC. CTP classification and BCLC staging were the significant predictors of survival. Future trials with large number of patients are needed to further validate this observation.     

Comparison of hepatic resection and transarterial chemoembolization for solitary hepatocellular carcinoma

AIM: To compare the outcomes of hepatic resection and transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) for solitary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) according to the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging system.METHODS: A consecutive sample of 540 patients with solitary HCC who underwent liver resection (n = 312) or TACE (n = 128) were included in the present study. Baseline characteristics, tumor characteristics, and post-operative complications were compared between the two groups. The Kaplan-Meier method was used for long-term survival analysis. Independent prognostic predictors were identified using the Cox proportional hazards model (univariate and multivariate analyses).RESULTS: The TACE and liver resection groups had similar baseline demographic and clinicopathological characteristics. The TACE group showed a significantly lower rate of major complications than the liver resection group (3.9% vs 17.4%, P < 0.001). Univariate and multivariate analyses indicated that TACE did not contribute to poor overall survival compared with liver resection; however, a solitary tumor diameter of greater than 6 cm should be considered a risk factor for poor overall survival (HR = 1.328, 95%CI: 1.002-1.783, P = 0.048). The liver resection and TACE groups had comparable overall survival rates at 1 year, 3 years, and 5 years (86.2%, 62.8%, and 44.0% vs 88.3%, 59.8%, and 40.6%, respectively, P = 0.419). In cases with tumor diameters equal to or less than 6 cm, the liver resection group showed a survival benefit compared with the TACE group at 1 year, 3 years, and 5 years (P = 0.030). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rates of HCC cases with tumor diameters of more than 6 cm were similar among the liver resection and TACE groups (P = 0.467).CONCLUSION: A tumor diameter of 6 cm should be the cutoff for deciding between liver resection and TACE.     

Surgery combined with post-operative trancatheter arterial chemoembolization improves survival of intermediate hepatocellular carcinoma

Aim: To investigate the efficacy of surgery combined with post-operative trancatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) for intermediate hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Methods: A total of 102 patients were divided into two groups: Radical liver resection only (LR group, 52 patients) and radical liver resection combined with post-operative TACE (combined group, 50 patients). Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan–Meier method. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed using Cox proportional analysis to detect prognostic factors of survival outcomes.

Results: The 1-, 3- and 5-year survival rate in the LR group were significantly lower compared with those in combined group (p?=?.019). The 1-, 3- and 5-year progression-free survival rate in the LR group were also lower than those in the combined group (p?=?.048). Multivariate analysis detected that tumor number (multiple vs single), tumor distribution (both lobes vs semi-liver), treatment strategy (surgery?+?TACE vs surgery) were independent factors for OS (HR values were 2.307, 3.155 and 0.526, respectively) and PFS (HR values were 1.938, 3.425 and 0.633, respectively; p?<?.05).

Conclusion: In conclusion, surgery combined with post-operative TACE may improve survival outcomes for patients with intermediate HCC. Tumor number, tumor distribution and treatment strategy (surgery?+?TACE) were significantly associated with the prognosis of patients with intermediate HCC.     

Effective treatment strategies other than sorafenib for the patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma invading portal vein

Patients with hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC) accompanying portal vein tumor thrombosis(PVTT) have relatively few therapeutic options and an extremely poor prognosis. These patients are classified into barcelonaclinic liver cancer stage C and sorafenib is suggested as the standard therapy of care. However, overall survival(OS) gain from sorafenib is unsatisfactory and better treatment modalities are urgently required. Therefore, we critically appraised recent data for the various treatment strategies for patients with HCC accompanying PVTT. In suitable patients, even surgical resection can be considered a potentially curative strategy. Transarterial chemoembolization(TACE) can be performed effectively and safely in a carefully chosen population of patients with reserved liver function and sufficient collateral blood flow nearby the blocked portal vein. A recent metaanalysis demonstrated that TACE achieved a substantial improvement of OS in HCC patients accompanying PVTT compared with best supportive care. In addition, transarterial radioembolization(TARE) using yttrium-90 microspheres achieves quality-of-life advantages and is as effective as TACE. A large proportion of HCC patients accompanying PVTT are considered to be proper for TARE. Moreover, TACE or TARE achieved comparable outcomes to sorafenib in recent studies and it was also reported that the combination of radiotherapy with TACE achieved a survival gain compared to sorafenib in HCC patients accompanying PVTT. Surgical resectionbased multimodal treatments, transarterial approaches including TACE and TARE, and TACE-based appropriate combination strategies may improve OS of HCC patients accompanying PVTT.     

Treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma accompanied by portal vein tumor thrombus

INTRODUCTIONRecent progress in imaging techniques has permitted the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) at an early stage. However, portal venous invasion is still found in 12.5%-39.7% of patients with HCC[1-5]. According to the 16th National Surv…     

Effective Biliary Drainage and Proper Treatment Improve Outcomes of Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Obstructive Jaundice

Background/Aims

We investigated the treatment outcomes and prognostic factors of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with obstructive jaundice.

Methods

Among 2,861 patients newly diagnosed with HCC between 2002 and 2011, a total of 63 patients who initially presented with obstructive jaundice were analyzed. Only four patients presented with resectable tumors and underwent curative resection. In the other patients who presented with unresectable tumors, 5, 8, 9, and 18 patients received transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and combined treatment, respectively. Both the clinical and the treatment factors that affect overall survival (OS) were analyzed.

Results

The median OS was 4 months, and the 1-year OS rate was 23%. Patients who received treatment for HCC had a significantly improved OS rate compared with the patients who received supportive care only (1-year OS, 32% vs 0%; p<0.01). Responders to treatment showed a better OS than nonresponders (1-year OS, 52% vs 0%; p<0.01). TACE and radiotherapy resulted in relatively good treatment responses of 64% and 67%, respectively. In multivariate analyses, treatment of HCC (p=0.02) and the normalization of serum bilirubin by biliary drainage (p=0.02) were significantly favorable prognostic factors that affected the OS.

Conclusions

Unresectable HCC with obstructive jaundice has a poor prognosis. However, effective biliary drainage and treatment of HCC such as with TACE or radiotherapy improves survival.     

Changes in hepatitis B virus DNA levels and liver function after transcatheter arterial chemoembolization of hepatocellular carcinoma

Aim: Reports concerning changes in hepatitis B virus (HBV) status and liver function in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) during or after transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) have been rare and the results inconsistent. The objective of this retrospective study was to evaluate these parameters in a large cohort of HBV‐related HCC patients. Methods: One hundred and seventy‐two hepatitis B surface antigen positive HCC patients with Child–Pugh grade A or B liver disease who underwent 228 sessions of TACE were enrolled, and related clinical and laboratory data were analyzed. Results: In total, HBV reactivated in 33 (14.5%), remained stable in 152 (66.7%) and decreased in 43 (18.8%) sessions. Univariate analysis revealed that sex and HBV DNA levels correlated with changes in HBV DNA status after TACE, while hepatitis B e‐antigen (HBeAg), prothrombin time and chemotherapeutic agents were marginally significant factors. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that the major factors that influenced the HBV DNA status were baseline HBV DNA levels(P = 0.0002) and HBeAg (P = 0.0387). A comparison of the post‐TACE (30–90 days) liver function to the baseline revealed no significant differences. The reactivation group has the highest rate of exacerbation (12.1%) compared with the stable group (5.9%) and downregulation group (4.7%). Conclusion: HBV DNA changes after TACE included reactivated, decreased and stable HBV DNA levels. Although HBV reactivation did not necessarily result in exacerbation of liver damage and most HCC patients with Child–Pugh grade A and B tolerated TACE well, careful post‐procedure monitoring and managing is needed.     

Hepatectomy is associated with survival in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: An observational study by instrumental variable analysis

Liver resection (LR) is a major treatment modality in select patients with stage I-III Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC), yet many studies demonstrated low rates of resection. The aim of the present study is to evaluate whether increasing resection rates would result in an increase in average survival in patients with stage I-III ICC.Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results 18 registry database for 2004 through 2015 was retrieved for the present study. Propensity score matching was performed to eliminate possible bias. In addition, instrumental variable (IV) analysis was utilized to adjust for both measured and unmeasured confounders.Among 2341 patients with clinical stage I-III ICC, we identified 1577 (67.4%) and 764 (32.6%) patients who received no treatment or LR, respectively. In the multivariable adjusted cohort, a clear prognostic advantage of LR was observed in overall survival (OS) (P < .001) and disease-specific survival (DSS) (P < .001) compared to patients who received no treatment. Estimates based on the IV analysis indicated that patients treated with LR had a significantly longer OS (P < .001) and DSS (P < .001) after adjusting confounding factors. In IV analyses stratified by American Joint Committee on Cancer tumor stage, we found that the better survival effects of LR on OS and DSS were consistent across all subgroups.Our outcomes indicated that LR was associated with a survival benefit for marginal patients with stage I-III ICC.     

Transarterial chemoembolization plus sorafenib versus sorafenib for intermediate–advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A meta-analysis comparing clinical outcomes

Background:Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) ranks as the sixth most common cancer and the second leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide, local and systemic therapies are beneficial for those who have more advanced disease or are not suitable for radical treatment. We aim to investigate the clinical outcomes of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) plus sorafenib compared with sorafenib monotherapy for intermediate–advanced HCC.Methods:A systematic search according to preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines in the PubMed database was conducted from inception to December 31, 2020 for published studies comparing survival outcomes and tumor response between TACE + sorafenib and sorafenib alone for intermediate–advanced HCC.Results:Five eligible cohort studies and a randomized controlled trial with a total of 3015 patients were identified. We found that the TACE + sorafenib group had a significantly better overall survival (OS) (hazard ratio, 0.77; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.66–0.88, P < .001) than those treated with sorafenib. Median OS ranged from 7.0 to 22.0 months with TACE + sorafenib and from 5.9 to 18.0 months with sorafenib. The combination of TACE + sorafenib had a significantly better time to progression (hazard ratio, 0.74; 95% CI 0.65–0.82, P < .001) than those treated with sorafenib. Median time to progression ranged from 2.5 to 5.3 months with TACE + sorafenib and from 2.1 to 2.8 months with sorafenib. The results showed the TACE + sorafenib group had a higher disease control rate (log odds ratio, 0.52; 95% CI 0.25–0.80, P = .0002), objective response rate (log odds ratio, 0.85; 95% CI 0.37–1.33, P = .0006) than sorafenib group. Hand–foot skin reaction, diarrhea, fatigue, vomiting, and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) elevation were common adverse events. The adverse events were similar between the 2 groups excluding elevated ALT.Conclusion:Although the TACE + sorafenib group had a higher elevated ALT, the combination of TACE + sorafenib had an OS benefit compared with sorafenib in the treatment of intermediate–advanced HCC. Further research is necessary to affirm this finding and clarify whether certain subgroups benefit from different combinations between TACE and sorafenib.