首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
相似文献
 共查询到10条相似文献,搜索用时 93 毫秒
1.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of different viscoelastic substances on the grade and time course of postoperative corneal edema. SETTING: Department of Clinical Sciences/Ophthalmology, Ume? University Hospital, Ume?, Sweden. METHODS: This study comprised 62 patients with otherwise healthy eyes who had routine phacoemulsification and intraocular lens (IOL) implantation. Patients were divided into 3 groups. Group 1 was given Healon GV (sodium hyaluronate 1.4%) at phacoemulsification and IOL implantation. Group 2 was given Viscoat (sodium hyaluronate 3.0%-chondroitin sulfate 4.0%) at phacoemulsification and Healon GV at IOL implantation. Group 3 was given Viscoat at phacoemulsification and Provisc (sodium hyaluronate 1.0%) at lens implantation. The central corneal thickness was measured with ultrasonic pachymetry before surgery and 5 and 24 hours, 1 week, and 1 month after surgery. RESULTS: The mean increase in corneal thickness was significantly greater in Group 1 than in the other 2 groups 5 and 24 hours and 1 week after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The transient postoperative increase in central corneal thickness was greater in patients receiving Healon GV during phacoemulsification than in patients receiving Viscoat. The use of Provisc or Healon GV for IOL implantation did not affect the postoperative corneal thickness when Viscoat was used for phacoemulsification. The time course of the edema may be explained by a difference between the 2 agents in endothelial protection from ultrasonic, mechanical, or irrigation trauma.  相似文献   

2.
壳多糖在白内障人工晶状体植入术中的应用   总被引:5,自引:0,他引:5  
比较壳多糖与透明质酸钠作为粘弹剂在白内障人工晶状体手术中的作用。方法对140例白内障随机分组,分别彩和ECCE+IOL或超声乳化吸出IOL两种手术方法。70眼术中用壳多糖作为粘弹剂使用,70眼用透明质酸钠作为对照。结果术后矫正视力,角膜内皮,前房反应以及眼压变化,壳多糖组与透明质酸钠组均无显著差异。  相似文献   

3.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of 7 viscoelastic materials on the physical properties of the Unfolder lens injection system. SETTING: John A. Moran Eye Center, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA. METHODS: New sterile SI-40NB intraocular lenses (IOLs) were loaded into the Unfolder (AMO PhacoFlex II SofTip insertion system (Allergan) using 7 viscoelastic materials: sodium hyaluronate 1.0% (Healon, Provisc), sodium hyaluronate 1.4% (Healon GV), sodium hyaluronate 1.6% (Amvisc Plus), hydroxypropyl methylcellulose 2.0% (Occucoat), sodium chondroitin 4.0%--sodium hyaluronate 3.0% (Viscoat), and hyaluronate 3.0% (Vitrax). The IOLs were then injected after 10 or 120 seconds in the chamber (chamber dwell time) and 10, 60, or 180 seconds in the barrel of the Unfolder cartridge (barrel dwell time). Torque values (g/cm) required to extrude the lenses were measured with a torque gauge, and the cartridges and IOLs were inspected for damage. RESULTS: Longer chamber dwell times resulted in lower torque values to extrude the IOLs (P < .001). Conversely, longer barrel dwell times resulted in higher torque requirements for IOL extrusion (P < .001). Furthermore, rates of adverse events, such as nondelivery, IOL damage, or Unfolder cartridge damage, were higher with shorter chamber dwell times and longer barrel dwell times (P < .001). However, IOL damage was avoided when the manufacturer's recommended chamber and barrel times were used. CONCLUSION: Increasing chamber dwell time and decreasing barrel dwell time resulted in lower torque values to extrude IOLs from the Unfolder and increased successful use. Moreover, dispersive viscoelastic agents tended to be more forgiving of changing dwell times and therefore had lower torque values and adverse event rates overall.  相似文献   

4.
We compared the effects of Viscoat and Healon on postoperative increases in intraocular pressure in patients undergoing uncomplicated extracapsular cataract extraction with posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation in a prospective, randomized, single-masked study. Eleven eyes received Viscoat and 13 received Healon. The Viscoat or Healon was aspirated from the anterior chamber with the irrigation-aspiration tip of an automated irrigation-aspiration system at the end of the procedure. No prophylactic intraoperative or postoperative ocular hypotensive agents were used. Intraocular pressure was measured at three, six, 12, and 24 hours postoperatively. Compared with preoperative intraocular pressure, postoperative intraocular pressure was significantly increased in both the Viscoat group and the Healon group. Some postoperative intraocular pressures were as high as 50 to 60 mm Hg, despite removal of the viscoelastic substance at the end of surgery. There was no significant difference in the postoperative intraocular pressures of the Viscoat group and the Healon group.  相似文献   

5.
We compared the effect of Occucoat (2% hydroxypropylmethyl-cellulose), Viscoat (sodium hyaluronate-chondroitin sulfate), and Healon (sodium hyaluronate) on postoperative intraocular pressure (IOP) and endothelial cell damage. One hundred fourteen patients having planned extracapsular cataract extraction with posterior chamber lens implantation using a viscomaterial were prospectively randomized into one of five groups. Group I received Occucoat which was removed from the anterior chamber at the conclusion of surgery. Group II received Occucoat which was not removed (retained). Group III received Viscoat which was removed, Group IV received Viscoat which was retained, and Group V received Healon which was removed. No prophylactic ocular hypotensive medications were given. Intraocular pressure was measured at four hours, 24 hours, one week, one month, three months, and one year postoperatively. Compared to preoperative IOP, all groups had a significant IOP increase at four hours. All but the Viscoat removed group (Group III) showed a statistically significant increase at 24 hours postoperatively (P less than .05). No group had a significant increase at one week or later. Specular microscopy showed no significant difference in cell loss between any of the groups at three months or within each group when compared to preoperative cell counts (P greater than .1).  相似文献   

6.
Purpose: To compare a new ophthalmic viscoelastic device (OVD) Healon 5 with two other kinds of OVDs commonly used in China during phacoemulsification and intraocular lens (IOL) implantation in terms of removal time, intraocular pressure, corneal and anterior chamber response.Methods: This prospective randomized study, in which patients and observers are masked, comprises niety eyes. They were randomly divided into 3 groups with different OVDs. Healon 5 (sodium hyaluronate 5 000 2.3%) was compared with Healon GV (sodium hyaluronate 7 000 1.4%) and Iviz (sodium hyaluronate 1.0%) . The surgeries were performed with temporal corneal incision, phacoemulsification in situ and foldable lens intracapsular implantation. The characteristic and the removal time of the viscoelastic material as well as the postoperative IOP, corneal reaction and anterior chamber reactions of the eyes were observed preoperatively and 24 hrs postoperatively. Exclusion criteria were glaucoma, a preoperative dilated pupil diameter small  相似文献   

7.
PURPOSE: To compare the ability of Healon GV (sodium hyaluronate 1.4%) and Viscoat (sodium chondroitin sulfate 4.0%-sodium hyaluronate 3.0%) to protect the corneal endothelium during endocapsular phacoemulsification and foldable intraocular lens (IOL) implantation. SETTING: A small ophthalmology group practice. METHODS: One hundred forty patients were randomized, 70 per group, in a prospective, partially masked study of cataract surgery using Healon GV or Viscoat. One ophthalmologist performed all surgery. Primary outcome variables were the 2 week postoperative changes in corneal thickness, endothelial cell density, mean endothelial cell size, and endothelial cell hexagonality. Several secondary variables were measured, and an analysis of the statistical power of the study was performed. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences between groups in terms of age (P = .856), cataract density (P = .117), preoperative best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) (P = .892), postoperative BCVA (P = .969), amount of viscoelastic material used during surgery (P = .444), amount of irrigating solution used (P = .125), or phacoemulsification time (P = .088). It took longer to remove the Viscoat than the Healon GV (P < .001), and total operating time for the Viscoat group was longer (P < .001). Two weeks after surgery, there were no significant differences between groups in corneal thickness (P = .362), endothelial cell density (P = .351), or mean endothelial cell size (P = .610). However, Viscoat preserved the hexagonal shape of endothelial cells slightly better than Healon GV (P = .043). The study had sufficient power to detect clinically significant differences in corneal thickness, endothelial cell density, and endothelial cell size. CONCLUSIONS: Healon GV and Viscoat were comparable in their ability to protect the corneal endothelium during endocapsular phacoemulsification and foldable IOL implantation. Results may vary, however, if phacoemulsification is performed anterior to the iris plane.  相似文献   

8.
We performed a prospective randomized clinical trial of 4% polyacrylamide (Orcolon) and 1% sodium hyaluronate (Healon) in routine extracapsular cataract extraction with posterior chamber lens implantation or in secondary anterior chamber lens implantation. Seventy consecutive patients were enrolled. The viscoelastic agents were compared in four areas intraoperatively: ease of injection, ease of removal, clarity of field and ability to hold back ocular tissues. Healon was significantly superior to Orcolon in all four areas. Further evaluations were performed on the first day and at 2 weeks postoperatively. Measurements of intraocular pressure (IOP) by Goldmann applanation and evaluations of corneal edema, epithelial keratitis and anterior chamber cellular reaction were recorded. Multivariable statistical analysis revealed only one difference between the two groups: significantly more patients in the Orcolon group (eight cases) than in the Healon group (two cases) had an IOP of 21 mm Hg or greater on the first postoperative day.  相似文献   

9.
A prospective randomized study was conducted in 137 patients who underwent cataract surgery and implantation of a polymethylmethacrylate intraocular lens with either polyacrylamide (Orcolon) (68 patients) or sodium hyaluronate (Healon) (69 patients) as the viscoelastic material. Both viscoelastics were aspirated at the end of surgery. Patients were examined before surgery and 1 and 14 days after surgery. Endothelial cell counts were obtained before surgery and 3 months after surgery in 34 patients (16 in the polyacrylamide group and 18 in the sodium hyaluronate group). There were no reports of a flat or shallow anterior chamber intraoperatively in either group. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in the incidence of corneal edema or iritis on any visit or in endothelial cell loss. Although there was a significant reduction in intraocular pressure across postoperative visits for the overall sample, there was no significant difference in pressure between the polyacrylamide and sodium hyaluronate groups. The results indicate that no untoward effects on corneal edema, endothelial cell count, iritis or intraocular pressure are to be expected when polyacrylamide is used as an aid to cataract surgery.  相似文献   

10.
A multicenter prospective trial was conducted comparing preoperative and postoperative endothelial cell counts in patients who had extracapsular cataract extraction with posterior chamber lens implantation or phacoemulsification and posterior chamber lens implantation. One hundred sixty six eyes received 2% hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (Occucoat) and 56 eyes received sodium hyaluronate (Healon). The average cell loss in the Occucoat group was 12.1%; in the Healon group it was 10% (P = NS). There was no significant difference between the two groups in intraocular pressure at 24 hours. In this study Occucoat was as effective in protecting the corneal endothelium as Healon.  相似文献   

设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号