GP's management of genital Chlamydia: a survey of reported practice

BACKGROUND: Genital chlamydial infection is the commonest curable sexually transmitted disease in the industrialized world. Little is known about how GPs manage this condition. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to determine current knowledge concerning genital chlamydia among GPs and to establish how patients with this infection are managed in primary care. METHODS: A confidential self-administered postal questionnaire survey was sent to all 494 GPs in one English health district (Leicestershire). RESULTS: Completed questionnaires were returned by 290 GPs (a response rate of 59%). A much higher proportion of GPs had tested and/or treated female patients for chlamydia [70%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 64-75%] as opposed to male patients (20%, CI 15-25%). Female patients (70%, CI 64-75%) were also more likely to be managed in general practice than male patients (56%, CI 50-62%). A majority of GPs (66%, CI 60-72%) routinely used an appropriate method of testing for chlamydia although a high vaginal swab, an inappropriate method of testing, was used by a fifth of GPs (19%, CI 15-24%). A large number of different treatment regimes were used by GPs. The majority of GPs (85%, CI 79-89%) prescribed an appropriate antibiotic although few GPs (19%, CI 14-25%) specified a chlamydia treatment regime in accordance with accepted international guidelines with respect to drug, dosage and duration of therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Female patients with known or suspected genital chlamydial infection are commonly managed in UK general practice. There is scope to improve the management of this infection in general practice.      

Countywide survey of the current practice of chlamydia detection in primary care

BACKGROUND: The Chief Medical Officer's (CMO's) Advisory Group on Chlamydia trachomatis (chlamydia) published its report in 1998 and a national screening programme is anticipated. Meanwhile the Public Health Laboratory Service (PHLS) reports that the number of positive diagnoses of genital chlamydia continued to rise throughout the last decade. OBJECTIVES: To consider the current practice of Gloucestershire general practitioners (GPs) for detecting genital chlamydia infections, and based on the findings to help the development of local guidelines and sexual health service provision. DESIGN: Questionnaire survey. SETTING: Primary care groups within a single English county. METHODS: A questionnaire survey was sent to GPs. Responses were handled anonymously and pooled for analysis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Response rates from GPs on the types of tests used for detection of chlamydia infection, how frequently they test different patient groups for chlamydia infection and attitudes to contact tracing. RESULTS: In women, opportunistic screening is not routinely performed and the rate of diagnostic testing varies with presentation. The rate of testing is comparatively lower in men and over 50% of GPs refer symptomatic men directly to a genitourinary medicine (GUM) clinic. Fewer than 50% of respondents always or usually forward details to GUM for contact tracing. CONCLUSIONS: Opportunistic screening is performed by a proportion of GPs but there is scope for more screening in higher risk groups. There is scope to increase the number of tests for chlamydia infection in patients presenting with symptoms. A programme of training and education in conjunction with guidelines may have merit in unifying practice and making detection and management of chlamydia more effective. This will have financial and resource implications.     

Willingness to offer chlamydia testing in general practice in New South Wales

OBJECTIVES: To assess willingness of general practitioners (GPs) to offer chlamydia testing to patients, and to identify demographic and practice correlates associated with willingness to offer chlamydia testing. METHODS: A postal survey of practising GPs in New South Wales was undertaken in 2002 to assess management of STIs in general practice. A 15% (n = 1,020) stratified random sample, based on sex and area of practice, was selected. The overall response rate was 45.4% (n = 409). RESULTS: More than four out of five study participants reported that chlamydia testing should usually be offered to patients who had recently changed sexual partners or inconsistently used barrier methods such as condoms. While 76% of GPs would like to offer testing to young women, 65% were in favour of testing young men. Just over half (56%) felt that chlamydia testing should usually be offered to patients at the time of a Pap smear. Multivariate analyses revealed that female GPs were more likely to offer testing to young patients and to female patients at the time of a Pap smear. GPs who had postgraduate training in STls had double the odds of offering testing to young men and to female patients at the time of a Pap smear. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: This paper reveals variations in GPs' willingness to offer chlamydia testing to patients. Special education programs highlighting the adverse health effects of chlamydial infection have the potential to improve GP involvement in chlamydia screening.     

Opportunism is NICE idea for chlamydia screening

Between 1995 and 2004, a frightening increase in most sexually transmitted diseases in the UK included a 223% rise in genital chlamydia, with 104,155 reported cases in 2004, making it the most commonly reported STD. Although many questions are yet to be answered after the release of the NICE review of the evidence for the effectiveness of screening for genital chlamydial infection in sexually active young women and men, the evidence seems to say a big ‘yes' to opportunistic screening of any patient under 25, whatever they have walked through the door for. However, NICE, in its evidence statements, did not consider the added value of partner notification/contact tracing - a job effectively managed in GUM clinics but not always undertaken by GPs.     

New Zealand rural primary health care workforce in 2005: more than just a doctor shortage

OBJECTIVE: To obtain a 2005 snapshot of New Zealand (NZ) rural primary health care workforce, specifically GPs, general practice nurses and community pharmacists. DESIGN: Postal questionnaires, November 2005. SETTING: NZ-wide rural general practices and community pharmacies. PARTICIPANTS: Rural general practice managers, GPs, nurses, community pharmacy managers and pharmacists. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Self-reported data: demographics, country of training, years in practice, business ownership, hours worked including on-call, intention to leave rural practice. RESULTS: General practices: response rate 95% (206/217); 70% GP-owned, practice size ranged from one GP/one nurse to 12 GPs/nine nurses. PHARMACIES: Response rate 90% (147/163). Majority had one (33%) or two (32%) pharmacists; <10% had more than three pharmacists. GPs: response rate 64% (358/559), 71% male, 73% aged >40, 61% full-time, 79% provide on-call, 57% overseas-trained, 78% male and 57% female GPs aged >40; more full-time male GPs (76%) than female (37%) . Nurses: response rate 65% (445/685), 97% female, 72% aged >40, 31% full-time, 28% provide on-call, 84% NZ-trained, 45% consulted independently in 'nurse-clinics' within practice setting. Pharmacists: response rate 96% (248/258), 52% male, 66% aged >40, 71% full-time, 33% provide on-call, 92% NZ-trained, 55% sole/partner pharmacy owners. Many intend to leave NZ rural practice within 5 years: GPs (34%), nurses (25%) and pharmacists (47%). CONCLUSION: This is the first NZ-wide rural workforce survey to include a range of rural primary health care providers (GPs, nurses and pharmacists). Ageing rural primary health care workforce and intentions to leave herald worsening workforce shortages.     

The effects of shifts in the balance of care on general practice workload.

BACKGROUND: The consequences of the move towards a primary-care-led NHS are shifts in activity from secondary care to primary care and more involvement of GPs in purchasing decisions. Although there are many anecdotal reports of an increasing primary care workload, there is little empirical evidence on the extent of such shifts. This paper reports the results of a survey of GPs in Grampian, in the north-east of Scotland, in which we attempted to gather information on the effects of shifts in the balance of care on general practice. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to examine GPs perceptions of the extent to which general practice workload has changed due to planned and unplanned shifts in the balance of care. METHODS: The design of the study was a self-reported questionnaire, which was administered in general practices in the Grampian Health Board, Scotland. The subjects were senior partners of all general practices and the main outcome measures were the types of changes which have taken place in general practice, their source, their effect on practice workload and how practices have reacted. RESULTS: A 60% response rate was achieved (52/86); 85% (44/52) of GPs claimed that their workload had increased due to shifts in the balance of care and that 72% of the shifts were initiated outside the practice. Geriatric care, early discharge and psychiatric and psychology services, as well as nursing home care, were reported to have had the greatest impact on workload. The main aspects of practice workload which had increased included the number of GP consultations, general stress at work and number of home visits, whereas the net income of the practice and health outcome of patients were reported to have decreased. Practices have dealt with the increase in workload by shifting tasks from GPs to nurses and absorbing the workload into existing practices/patterns. Responders reported that ideally more nursing and GP staffing would be required. Overall, GPs welcomed the shifts in the balance of care, were more concerned about poor communication rather than actual increases in workload and claimed that morale had fallen. CONCLUSION: GPs perceive that the move towards a primary-care-led NHS is increasing the workload in general practice. If the shift in the balance of care away from secondary care is to be successful, then more information is required about such shifts to support practices as change continues.     

Evidence-based guidelines for the management of genital chlamydial infection in general practice. (Leicestershire Chlamydia Guidelines Group).

BACKGROUND: Valid clinical guidelines can be effective in improving patient care. Genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection is the commonest curable sexually transmitted disease (STD) in England and Wales and is an important cause of pelvic inflammatory disease (PID), tubal infertility and ectopic pregnancy. No published guidelines exist on managing genital chlamydial infection in British general practice. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to develop valid guidelines for the management of genital chlamydial infection for use in British general practice. METHODS: A district-wide postal questionnaire survey was used to document current clinical practice. A critical review of the evidence concerning the management of genital chlamydial infection as it relates to British general practice was performed. The information gained from the critical review and survey was used to develop evidence-based guidelines within a multidisciplinary guideline recommendation group. RESULTS: The guidelines covered the diagnosis, investigation, drug treatment and referral of adult male and female patients with genital chlamydial infection in general practice. CONCLUSION: Valid guidelines for the management of genital chlamydial infection have been developed for use in British general practice. Appropriate dissemination and implementation of the guidelines should lead to earlier detection and treatment of men and women with chlamydial infection and thereby reduce the incidence of PID, tubal infertility and ectopic pregnancy in women.     

"Opening a can of worms": GP and practice nurse barriers to talking about sexual health in primary care

BACKGROUND: There is evidence that health professionals do not discuss sexually related issues in consultations as often as patients would like. Although primary care has been identified as the preferred place to seek treatment for sexual health concerns, little is known either of the factors that prevent GPs and practice nurses initiating such discussions or of how they feel communication in this area could be improved. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the present study was to identify barriers perceived by GPs and practice nurses to inhibit discussion of sexual health issues in primary care and explore strategies to improve communication in this area. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 22 GPs and 35 practice nurses recruited from diverse practices throughout Sheffield. RESULTS: The term 'can of worms' summarized participants' beliefs that sexually related issues are highly problematic within primary care because of their sensitivity, complexity and constraints of time and expertise. Particular barriers were identified to discussing sexual health with patients of the opposite gender, patients from Black and ethnic minority groups, middle-aged and older patients, and non-heterosexual patients. Potential strategies to improve communication about sexual health within primary care included training, providing patient information and expanding the role of the practice nurse; however, several limitations to these approaches were identified. CONCLUSION: GPs and practice nurses do not address sexual health issues proactively with patients, and this area warrants further attention if policy recommendations to expand the role of primary care within sexual health management are to be met.     

Chlamydia screening in general practice: views of professionals on the key elements of a successful programme

OBJECTIVES: Chlamydia trachomatis is a common sexually transmitted infection with serious consequences if not treated. Chlamydia screening pilots in England have established feasibility in primary care but there are currently no examples of good practice in general practice. The objectives of the study were to understand issues of using general practice as a setting for chlamydia screening and to explore ways of implementing a successful screening strategy. METHODS: Based on findings of a literature review, a semi-structured schedule was constructed to interview a purposive sample of policymakers, consultants in sexual and reproductive health and primary care professionals. A thematic framework was used for qualitative analysis. RESULTS: Twenty-two themes were identified and were ranked in order of word count. The topic that generated most discussion was heterogeneity of knowledge, attitudes and skills in general practice. When broken down by professional group, this topic ranked the highest for practice nurses and consultants in sexual health; general practitioners (GPs) and the chlamydia screening coordinator spoke most about financial incentives while the public health consultant spoke most about access. CONCLUSIONS: Most believed screening can and should be done and general practice can offer better population coverage. It needs to have little impact on clinicians' workload, for example, by using urine tests and self-taken vaginal swabs. Financial recognition needs to reflect the administrative costs and the impact on reception staff, but this and the innovative tests might add to the cost of the screening programme. Incentives have to be handled sensitively to reduce inequity among GPs and other services offering screening.     

Urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis infections in general practice: diagnosis, treatment, follow-up and contact tracing

BACKGROUND: Patients with urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis infection are frequently seen in general practice. It is, therefore, important to assess GPs' management of these patients in order to ensure adequate control of the disease. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the GPs' routines in diagnosis, medical treatment, follow-up and contact tracing according to knowledge/attitude (criteria) and actual performance. METHODS: The study comprised the 388 GPs in the County of Aarhus. Two questionnaires were used. The first questionnaire was mailed to each of 252 GPs who had attended a patient with urogenital C. trachomatis infection 4 weeks previously. Each GP was asked about his/her actual performance for that particular patient. In order to elucidate the GPs' criteria, the second questionnaire was mailed to each of the 388 GPs in the County of Aarhus, asking about their usual intended routines (criteria) for managing urogenital C. trachomatis infections. The questionnaires covered the same topics. RESULTS: Great variations among the GPs' management of urogenital C. trachomatis infection according to sampling-site, medical treatment, follow-up and contact tracing were found. Furthermore, a discrepancy between criteria and actual performance for obtaining an urethral swab-sample in women and for contact tracing of previous partners were demonstrated. The GPs stated that they had intended to obtain more urethral swab-samples and do more contact tracing than they actually did. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that increasing the collection of urethral samples from women combined with greater emphasis on contact tracing procedures might limit the prevalence of the infection. In order to achieve this, continuous medical education and auditing procedures on urogenital chlamydial infections may be helpful.      

Factors affecting practice nurse involvement in follow-up care of patients following myocardial infarction

BACKGROUND: Preventive care can reduce the morbidity and mortality of patients following myocardial infarction. Recent evidence has shown that such care is not being provided effectively. The involvement of practice nurses has been proposed as a means of improving the completeness of follow-up and the quality of preventive care. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to determine the extent to which follow-up care for people discharged from hospital after a myocardial infarction is currently being undertaken by practice nurses and to assess the factors influencing the provision of such care and the nurses' attitudes towards this extended role. METHOD: Postal questionnaires were sent to 183 practice nurses working in general practices in the Southampton and South-West Hampshire Health District; 121 nurses responded (66%), representing 58 out of 64 practices surveyed (91%). RESULTS: The majority of responding practice nurses (55%, 95% CI 47-64%) had hospital experience of caring for patients with ischaemic heart disease, and most (83%, 95% CI 76-89%) believed that they played a key role in follow-up care of patients following myocardial infarction. In the absence of external support from a cardiac liaison nurse, few nurses (26%, 95% CI 16-41%) provide such care at present and only 21% work in practices with a register of myocardial infarction patients. Factors predicting the provision of follow-up care are having adequate time (odds ratio 4.59, 95% CI 1.66-12.7), the support of a cardiac liaison nurse (odds ratio 3.07, 95% CI 1.28-7.34) and GP colleagues (odds ratio 3.38, 95% CI 1.38-8.23), training in consultation skills (odds ratio 7.25, 95% CI 2.08-25.3), fundholding (odds ratio 3.11, 95% CI 1.26-7.69) and the confidence and knowledge of the practice nurse (odds ratios and 95% CIs respectively: 2.84, 1.18-6.83 and 2.80, 1.13- 6.89). CONCLUSION: Most practice nurses are enthusiastic and have some of the necessary experience to provide follow-up care for patients who have experienced a myocardial infarction. Yet few currently provide it. The most important organizational incentives for providing such care are further training and the support of GPs and the cardiac liaison nurse.      

Testing for cervical Chlamydia trachomatis infection in an inner city practice.

The aims of the study were to find the prevalence of cervical Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women attending for a speculum examination, to examine possible risk factors, and to see if we could develop a rational policy for testing for chlamydia in our deprived inner London practice. During 18 months 409 women aged 17-45 (mean 28) who attended for a cervical smear or vaginal examination were tested for chlamydia using the direct immunofluorescent test. They were assessed for possible risk factors: age less than 25, more than one sexual partner in the previous 3 months, sexual contact with men with urethritis, past history of chlamydia infection, purulent vaginal discharge, cervicitis and abnormal cervical cytology. Thirty-six women (8.8%) were chlamydia positive. Chlamydia infection was significantly associated with the presence of purulent vaginal discharge or an inflammatory cervical smear. In view of the prevalence of chlamydial cervicitis, the lack of symptoms and signs, and the potential consequences of untreated infection, ideally all young women in this population should be offered screening when they attend for a speculum examination. If this is not practical, chlamydia testing might be offered to women thought to be in high-risk groups including those with purulent vaginal discharge or an inflammatory cervical smear.     

Women users' views on the role and value of the practice nurse

Aspects of the views of women aged 16–65 years on practice nurses in the primary health care setting are explored. The extent to which women consult practice nurses and the reasons for consultation are first identified. Women's assessments of practice nurses are then examined. The findings are from a 3-year research project where 1251 women completed a postal questionnaire and 70 women were interviewed in depth about issues concerning women's perceptions and experiences of both general practitioners (GPs) and practice nurses. Two thirds of the sample had consulted the practice nurse; 22% about specific women's health issues (including 13% for cervical screening). For most women's health issues, more women expressed a preference to be seen by a general practitioner (GP) than a practice nurse, except for breast examination among women aged 49 to 65 years where 57% expressed a preference for a practice nurse compared with 43% for a GP. Women gave similarly positive evaluations of the approachability of practice nurses and GPs. Positive views of practice nurses were high among older women, women who saw practice nurses in well-women clinics and women who saw practice nurses in relation to women's health issues. Among women who had not consulted a practice nurse, there was both a lack of awareness of the level and range of expertise of practice nurses, and a perception that in the main they offered only minor routine services. Health promotion, disease prevention and family planning do not appear to feature centrally in women's expectations of services provided by the practice nurse.     

General practitioners' knowledge and attitudes to contact tracing for genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection in North Queensland

INTRODUCTION: Most diagnoses of genital chlamydia infection in Queensland are made by general practitioners (GPs). This study aimed to assess GP attitudes to and knowledge of contact tracing in rural North Queensland. METHOD: A single page questionnaire mailed to a database of 65 GPs in May 2007. RESULTS: Nearly all respondents (42/43, 97.7%) 'always' or 'mostly' told patients to advise their contacts to seek medical treatment. More than half (24/44, 54.5%) felt that contact tracing was 'sometimes' or 'never' the responsibility of GPs. Around half of respondents (19/39, 48.7%) thought that the local public health unit staff were conducting contact tracing, which is not actually the case. CONCLUSION: There is lack of clarity surrounding the respective roles and responsibilities of sexual health units, public health units and GPs regarding contact tracing for chlamydia infection. IMPLICATIONS: GPs would benefit from education clarifying current contact tracing procedures, methods and resources.     

Management of hepatitis B immunizations and blood exposure incidents in primary care

AIM: To investigate how well primary care health care workers, with no access to an occupational health service (OHS), have managed their hepatitis B immunizations and blood exposure incidents, compared with National Health Service Trust staff, with access to an OHS. METHOD: A questionnaire was sent to 78 general practitioners (GPs), 93 general practice nurses, 81 NHS Trust consultants and 88 NHS Trust community nurses, in the Airedale area of West Yorkshire in June 2001. RESULTS: The response rate was 80%. GPs were significantly less likely than consultants to have received a hepatitis B booster vaccination after their primary course (57 versus 80%, P < 0.009) and significantly less likely to have had their blood anti-HBs test checked after their last vaccination (74 versus 94%, P < 0.011). General practice nurses were significantly less likely to fill in a blood exposure incident form after an injury than community nurses (56 versus 91%, P < 0.006). Overall, the group with access to an OHS was significantly more likely to have received a hepatitis B booster (P < 0.036), have had a blood anti-HBs test after last vaccination (P < 0.010) and to have filled in a blood exposure incident form after last blood exposure (P < 0.033), than the group without access to an OHS. CONCLUSION: Any future OHS with responsibility for primary care, should consider calling in all GPs and general practice nurses for a review of their hepatitis immunity and for education regarding the management of blood exposure incidents.     

Sustained benefits of a community dietetics intervention designed to improve oral nutritional supplement prescribing practices

Background: Healthcare professionals working in the community do not always prescribe oral nutritional supplements (ONS) according to best practice guidelines for the management of malnutrition. The present study aimed to determine the impact of a community dietetics intervention on ONS prescribing practices and expenditure 1 year later. Methods: The intervention involved general practitioners (GPs), practice nurses, nurses in local nursing homes and community nurses. It comprised an education programme together with the provision of a new community dietetics service. Changes in health care professionals’ nutrition care practices were determined by examining community dietetics records. ONS prescribing volume and expenditure on ONS were assessed using data from the Primary Care Reimbursement Service of the Irish Health Service Executive. Results: Seven out of 10 principal GPs participated in the nutrition education programme. One year later, screening for malnutrition risk was better, dietary advice was provided more often, referral to the community dietetics service improved and ONS were prescribed for a greater proportion of patients at ‘high risk’ of malnutrition than before (88% versus 37%; P < 0.001). There was a trend towards fewer patients being prescribed ONS (18% reduction; P = 0.074) and there was no significant change in expenditure on ONS by participating GPs (3% reduction; P = 0.499), despite a 28% increase nationally by GPs on ONS. Conclusions: The community dietetics intervention improved ONS prescribing practices by GPs and nurses, in accordance with best practice guidelines, without increasing expenditure on ONS during the year after intervention.     

Soft governance and attitudes to clinical quality in English general practice

OBJECTIVES: English primary care organisations (primary care groups and trusts - PCGs, PCTs) were, and are, responsible for the quality of general practice but lack hierarchical structures and, frequently, contractual relationships through which to influence it. The theory of soft governance describes how managers can influence professional practice by other means. This study examines the hypothesis that PCG/Ts have used 'soft' clinical governance. METHODS: Survey in 2000/01 of general practitioners' (GPs') attitudes, opinions and self-reported activity in six PCGs and six PCTs using a semi-structured mailed questionnaire. To assess how representative respondents were of English GPs generally, four questions from a national sample survey of English GPs were included and the results compared. RESULTS: Responses were obtained from 437 (52%) GPs. They most often mentioned the technical aspects of clinical governance. Managerial, policy and resourcing implications were next most frequently mentioned, usually in unfavourable terms. Most GPs reported that their clinical practice had changed because of clinical governance activities, although nearly 40% also reported little difference in the quality of care provided. The National Service Framework for coronary heart disease influenced practice independently of PCG/T activities. CONCLUSION: English primary care organisations are exercising soft governance (although not by that name) over some but not all aspects of GPs' clinical practice. However, this soft governance is complex, not easy to sustain and appears hard to extend beyond essentially clinical domains.     

Prevalence of genital chlamydial infection in young women entering a national job training program, 1990-1997

OBJECTIVES: This analysis describes trends in the prevalence of genital chlamydial infection in economically disadvantaged young women entering a national job training program. METHODS: We examined chlamydia test data for May 1990 through June 1997 for women aged 16 to 24 years who enrolled in the program. The significance of trends was evaluated with the chi 2 test for trend. RESULTS: Prevalence of chlamydial infection declined 32.9%, from 14.9% in 1990 to 10.0% in 1997 (P < .001). Prevalence decreased significantly in all age groups, racial/ethnic groups, and geographic regions. CONCLUSIONS: The decrease in prevalence of chlamydial infection suggests that prevention activities have reached disadvantaged women across the United States; however, prevalence of chlamydial infection remains high, and enhanced prevention efforts in disadvantaged communities are urgently needed.