首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
相似文献
 共查询到19条相似文献,搜索用时 109 毫秒
1.
卫生部《健康档案基本架构与数据标准(试行)》为医疗信息共享奠定了基础,但是将现有的医疗数据改造为健康档案标准指定的格式,仍然需要做很多工作,而第一步就是找出现有数据和标准间的差异。文中讨论了在判定现有医疗数据是否符合标准时,必须的验证内容和验证流程,同时介绍了实现的验证工具,并对工具输出的检测结果进行了分析,归纳了现有医疗数据和健康档案标准间的常见差异类型,有助于改进现有医疗数据以符合健康档案标准。  相似文献   

2.
目的采用澳大利亚的病人满意和体验监测工具(VPSM),对住院病人满意度进行测量,检验该工具在中国医院质量改进过程中的适用性,并提示中国医疗服务质量的改进重点。方法北京两所医院按照VPSM方法学,独立地测量住院病人的满意和体验。结果统计学检验结果显示,两医院间满意度和各质量指数差别无显著性。两医院的结果均低于澳大利亚的测量结果,不排除被调查病人性别和年龄结构的影响。讨论VPSM在北京两医院的测量结果显示了其测量的稳定性及对医疗服务管理中薄弱环节的展示功能,是辅助医疗服务质量改进工作的有力工具。在机构间或国际间比较时,应该考虑到病人年龄、性别和付费方式的影响。  相似文献   

3.
“互联网+医疗健康”发展迅速,但医患沟通质量不高,且缺乏针对性测量工具。以高血压为例,遵循Hinkin量表开发步骤,开发了互联网医患功能沟通质量测量工具,包括患者信息收集质量、诊断信息提供质量、治疗决策制定质量、疾病及治疗相关行为促进质量4个维度共计25个条目。实证评价验证了其科学性,可以对互联网医患功能沟通质量进行测量,有助于提高我国互联网医患功能沟通质量水平。  相似文献   

4.
该文根据医疗质量形成的过程和规律,对现有医疗质量过程控制手段的分析,结合医院质量管理的实践,提出了通过强化医疗过程质量控制的一些方法,并讨论了持续改进医疗质量的关键问题,以更加规范、有效、有序、精细化地强化医疗质量管理工作,持续改进和提高医疗质量。  相似文献   

5.
医学中生活质量的测量应用很广泛,由于没有一个统一的定义和测量方法,在实际应用中存在很多问题,包括生活质量和健康状况含义上的混淆,在测量中过分地强调了功能,所使用的测量工具表面效度低等。为了正确地测量生活质量,在测量时应注意使用综合测量,表达出每一条目和维度的严格性和重要性,允许补充条目等。  相似文献   

6.
本文概述了欧洲质量奖及其卓越模式,介绍了Avedis Donabedian基金Paula Vauejo博士的研究项目,即以PATH(质量改进的医院绩效评价工具)为参考改进的医疗保健的EFQM卓越模式,并提出对我国现有医疗质量管理的借鉴意义。  相似文献   

7.
传统的医疗质量统计报告数据由人工提取或二次录入,准确性、时效性和全面性均得不到保障,无法满足当前医疗质量监管的需求。介绍了基于电子病历的医疗质量电子化自动测量概念,阐述了医疗质量自动化测量在建立和改善医疗质量统计指标体系、提高统计报告的准确性和时效性、提高医疗质量等方面的意义。分析了基于区域卫生信息平台的医疗质量报告体系的建设方法,以及从电子健康记录系统中自动提取数据,生成医疗质量指标并完成统计报告的流程、方法和途径。探讨了医疗质量电子化测量的现状以及我国所面临的问题和挑战,为我国实施医疗质量电子化测量提出了信息标准化方面的建议。  相似文献   

8.
目的 分析我国非营利性医院行政管理模式的弊端,提出人才管理新模式,以促进提高全体医疗质量水平。方法 通过调查问卷收集数据并做回归模型,以检验非营利性医院现有行政管理模式对医务人员基础工作的影响以及由这种影响所造成的医疗质量变化和患者满意度水平的变动。结果 传统的医院管理模式引致的医务人员工作表现指标与患者满意度水平呈负相关。结论 传统的医院管理模式严重制约医疗质量水平的提高,应转变传统的官本位管理模式,行政部门以医务人员为中心,医务人员以患者为中心,把医生还给患者。  相似文献   

9.
对医疗质量管理的概念、结构和医疗信息技术进行了介绍,分析了信息化环境下进行医疗质量管理的优势,着重探讨了基于医疗信息技术的医疗质量管理.提出了基于医疗信息技术的医疗质量管理体系和业务流程.并阐述了管理时应注意的问题。  相似文献   

10.
患者满意度及其测评工具研究综述   总被引:4,自引:0,他引:4  
本文从患者满意度的内涵出发,阐述了患者满意度与医疗服务质量之间的关系,介绍了国内外患者满意度理论的发展情况,并根据患者满意度测评工具指标体系的维度和指标数目特点,分类介绍几种具有代表性的工具,指出现有患者满意度测评工具的局限性,为建立合理的患者满意度测评体系和科学地进行医院服务管理提供借鉴。  相似文献   

11.
The diagnosis of dementia and the management of its associated symptoms are aided by high-quality assessment tools. However, there is disagreement on the optimal tools among abundant alternatives and lack of consistent quality standards across the different domains of dementia-related change (ie, cognition, severity, function, behavioral and psychological symptoms, delirium, quality of life). Standardization is difficult because the relevance of a measurement tool for health professionals may depend on the clinical setting and on the dementia type and severity. To address this need, we conducted a comprehensive and clinically relevant evidence-based review of dementia-related tools and present a set of recommended tools, the Dementia Outcomes Measurement Suite. The review revealed that considerable development has occurred in terms of assessment of persons with mild cognitive impairment, executive dysfunction, cognitively mediated functional change, and apathy. More research is needed to develop and validate tools to assess health-related quality of life and specific symptoms of dementia including anxiety, wandering, and repetitive vocalizations. This extensive overview of the quality of different measures may serve as a guide for health professionals clinically and for researchers developing new or improved dementia assessment tools.  相似文献   

12.
Health research institutes are a strategic commitment considered the ideal environment to develop excellence in translational research. Achieving quality research requires not only a powerful scientific and research structure but also the quality and integrity of management systems that support it. The essential instruments in our institution were solid strategic planning integrated into and consistent with the system of quality management, systematic evaluation through periodic indicators, measurement of key user satisfaction and internal audits, and implementation of an innovative information management tool. The implemented management tools have provided a strategic thrust to our institute while ensuring a level of quality and efficiency in the development and management of research that allows progress towards excellence in biomedical research.  相似文献   

13.
ObjectivesDespite common use of palliative care screening tools in other settings, the performance of these tools in the nursing home has not been well established; therefore, the purpose of this review is to (1) identify palliative care screening tools validated for nursing home residents and (2) critically appraise, compare, and summarize the quality of measurement properties.DesignSystematic review of measurement properties consistent with Consensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) guidelines.Settings and participantsEmbase (Ovid), MEDLINE (PubMed), CINAHL (EBSCO), and PsycINFO (Ovid) were searched from inception to May 2022. Studies that (1) reported the development or evaluation of a palliative care screening tool and (2) sampled older adults living in a nursing home were included.MethodsTwo reviewers independently screened, selected, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias.ResultsWe identified only 1 palliative care screening tool meeting COSMIN criteria, the NECesidades Paliativas (NEC-PAL, equivalent to palliative needs in English), but evidence for use with nursing home residents was of low quality. The NEC-PAL lacked robust testing of measurement properties such as reliability, sensitivity, and specificity in the nursing home setting. Construct validity through hypothesis testing was adequate but only reported in 1 study. Consequently, there is insufficient evidence to guide practice. Broadening the criteria further, this review reports on 3 additional palliative care screening tools identified during the search and screening process but which were excluded during full-text review for various reasons.Conclusion and ImplicationsGiven the unique care environment of nursing homes, we recommend future studies to validate available tools and develop new instruments specifically designed for nursing home use. In the meantime, we recommend that clinicians consider the evidence presented here and choose a screening instrument that best meets their needs.  相似文献   

14.
This article discusses measurement of quality in health care. The authors attempt to answer the following questions: why measure quality, and what will quality measurement do? The current quality measurement system is described including definitions of the measurable aspects of health care and current measurement tools. Finally, suggested benchmarks for various health care measurements are included.  相似文献   

15.
Microcomputers can be powerful teaching tools if educators learn to develop effective computer-assisted instruction (CAI). This paper reports on an allied health faculty development project that incorporated hands-on workshops and guided individual instruction led by a specialist in the educational uses of microcomputers. Faculty participants gained basic computer literacy skills and learned to assess the salient characteristics of quality software. They also learned specialized skills for designing their own CAI packages. The positive change in participants' knowledge about and attitude toward microcomputers as instructional tools was measured both subjectively by the authors and by a participants' self-report questionnaire. This project can serve as a model for helping allied health educators become computer literate and gain the skills necessary to evaluate and author quality computer-assisted instruction.  相似文献   

16.

Background

Little attention has been paid to selecting and developing health-related quality of life (HRQOL) measurement tools for young adult survivors of childhood cancer (YASCC). The primary purpose of this study was to develop a HRQOL tool for YASCC based on three legacy instruments.

Methods

Data collected from 151 YASCC were analyzed. HRQOL was measured using the Medical Outcomes Study SF-36, Quality of Life in Adult Cancer Survivors, and Quality of Life-Cancer Survivor. We used the following stages to develop our HRQOL tool: mapping items from three instruments into a common HRQOL construct, checking dimensionality using confirmatory factor analyses (CFA), and equating items using Rasch modeling.

Results

We assigned 123 items to a HRQOL construct comprised of six generic and eight survivor-specific domains. CFA retained 107 items that meet the assumptions of unidimensionality and local independence. Rasch analysis retained 68 items that satisfied the indices of information-weighted/outlier-sensitive fit statistic mean square. However, items in most domains possess relatively easy measurement properties, whereas YASCC??s underlying HRQOL was on the middle to higher levels.

Conclusions

Psychometric properties of the established tool for measuring HRQOL of YASCC were not satisfied. Future studies need to refine this tool, especially adding more challenging items.  相似文献   

17.
OBJECTIVES: To develop a clinically relevant and easy to use pain assessment tool for individuals with advanced dementia that has adequate psychometric properties. DESIGN: Instrument development study using expert clinicians and behavioral observation methods. Measurement of sensitivity of the instrument to detect the effects of analgesic medications in a quality improvement activity. SETTING: Inpatient dementia special care units in a Veterans Administration Medical Center. Participants: Nineteen residents with advanced dementia who were aphasic or lacked the ability to report their degree of pain and six professional staff members. Additionally, data from medical records of 25 residents who were receiving pain medications as required (PRN) were collected. Measurements: Based on the literature review, related assessment tools and consultation with expert clinicians, a five-item observational tool with a range of 0 to 10 was developed. The tool, Pain Assessment in Advanced Dementia (PAINAD), was compared with the Discomfort Scale and two visual analog scales (discomfort and pain) by trained raters/expert clinicians in the development study, and used for detection of analgesic efficacy in a quality improvement activity. RESULTS: Adequate levels of interrater reliability were achieved between dyads of the principal investigator with each clinical research rater and between two raters. PAINAD had satisfactory reliability by internal consistency with a one factor solution. PAINADthe Discomfort Scale-Dementia of Alzheimer Type (DS-DAT) were significantly correlated, providing evidence of construct validity. PAINAD detected statistically significant difference between scores obtained before and after receiving a pain medication. CONCLUSIONS: The PAINAD is a simple, valid, and reliable instrument for measurement of pain in noncommunicative patients. Since the patient population used for its development and testing was limited to a relatively small number of males, further research is needed before it can be universally recommended.  相似文献   

18.
目的分析第二受害者结局评估工具的主要内容、信效度得分、特点,并对工具未来发展提出思考和建议。方法检索数据库获取相关文献。结果最终纳入6类评估工具:第二受害者经验与支持量表(SVEST)、西班牙第二受害者调查工具、第二受害者心理影响与恢复调查工具、第二受害者伤害影响因素评价调查工具、医生母亲双重角色(DR-MOM)第二受害者调查工具、第二受害者事件反应调查工具。其中,SVEST包括1种英文版和3种汉化版。各工具均采用自评方式进行,内容各有侧重。结论第二受害者结局评估工具的理论基础薄弱,未突出特色,未来有必要提高此类工具的科学性和特异性,并开发适合我国国情的第二受害者结局评估工具。  相似文献   

19.

Background  

The COSMIN checklist is a standardized tool for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties. It contains 9 boxes, each dealing with one measurement property, with 5–18 items per box about design aspects and statistical methods. Our aim was to develop a scoring system for the COSMIN checklist to calculate quality scores per measurement property when using the checklist in systematic reviews of measurement properties.  相似文献   

设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号