Multicenter, comparative study of cycle control, efficacy and tolerability of two low-dose oral contraceptives containing 20 microg ethinylestradiol/100 microg levonorgestrel and 20 microg ethinylestradiol/500 microg norethisterone

A comparison of cycle control, efficacy and tolerability of two oral contraceptive preparations containing 20 microg ethinylestradiol combined with either 100 microg levonorgestrel (EE/LNG 20/100) or 500 microg norethisterone (EE/NET 20/500) was conducted. These results were compared to a standard reference preparation, containing 30 microg ethinylestradiol combined with 150 microg levonorgestrel (EE/LNG 30/150). Efficacy data from 8,544 treatment cycles were obtained from 767 women. Good cycle control and effective contraception was achieved with the two LNG preparations, however, the cycle control results were less favorable with EE/NET 20/500. The cumulative incidence of women with at least one episode of intermenstrual bleeding from cycles 2 to 7 (primary target variable) was 43.9% for EE/LNG 20/100, 72.7% for EE/NET 20/500, and 15.7% for the standard EE/LNG 30/150. The difference between the 2 20 microg of EE preparations, which favored EE/LNG 20/100, was statistically significant (p = 0.001). The overall spotting rates (cycles 1-13) were 9.3% for EE/LNG 20/100, 21.7% for EE/NET 20/500, and 3.3% for the standard EE/LNG 30/150. Amenorrhea was reported in 7.1% (EE/LNG 20/100), 20.6% (EE/NET 20/500), and 0.9% (standard EE/LNG 30/150), respectively. Intermenstrual bleeding episodes were shorter with EE/LNG 20/100 and EE/LNG 30/150 of the 13 treatment cycles. The study Pearl indices were 0.9 for EE/LNG 20/100, 1.9 for EE/NET 20/500, and 0.0 for EE/LNG 30/150. All three treatments were well tolerated. However, tolerability was somewhat less favorable with EE/NET 20/500. A total of 160 women prematurely discontinued the study for various reasons (EE/LNG 20/100: 7%; EE/NET 20/500: 18%; EE/LNG 30/150: 4%). The overall adverse event incidence rate during the trial was low in all groups. Blood pressure remained largely unaffected. Thirteen serious adverse events were recorded for all treatment groups, all but one were assessed as not related to the treatments. There were no remarkable treatment related differences in mean body weight throughout the study and the laboratory values were largely unaffected in all three treatments groups.     

Effect of some oral contraceptives on serum concentrations of sex hormone binding globulin and ceruloplasmin

Serum SHBG and ceruloplasmin (CP) concentrations were measured in women throughout a cycle of treatment with four oral contraceptives. In women receiving 150 micrograms levonorgestrel (LNG) daily both SHBG and CP decreased. SHBG also decreased, but CP increased, in women receiving ethynyloestradiol (EE) 30 micrograms with LNG 150 micrograms. In women taking 35 micrograms EE with either 600 micrograms or 1000 micrograms norethisterone, increases in CP were similar but SHBG increased more with the lower dose. Serum concentrations had not returned to pretreatment levels by eight days after cessation of dosing. The findings are compared with similar results for women taking 30 micrograms or 50 micrograms EE or an EE,LNG triphasic formulation. Serum concentrations of the gestagens were also measured. Increases in these concentrations when the gestagen was administered with EE to levels higher than expected from administration of the gestagen alone cannot be explained by increased binding to SHBG but are more likely to be due to changes in their metabolism. Differences in the responses of ostensibly closely related proteins of hepatic origin such as SHBG and CP to the oral contraceptives demonstrate that neither can be extrapolated to other pharmacodynamic responses.     

Lipid and biochemical changes after low-dose oral contraception.

A randomized double-blind study of the metabolic effects of 2 low-dose combined oral contraceptives was carried out in Singaporean women. The subjects comprised 58 women randomly allocated to two treatment groups (29 each): norethisterone 1 mg/ethinyl estradiol 35 micrograms (NET/EE) or levonorgestrel 150 micrograms/ethinyl estradiol 30 micrograms (LNG/EE) and a control group of 23 women using intra-uterine devices (IUD). Blood samples were taken on admission and at 3 and 12 months after pills or insertion of IUDs. Fasting glucose levels were decreased while 2h glucose and triglyceride were increased throughout the treatment period in NET/EE group [corrected]. LNG/EE group only showed significant increase of 2h glucose at 12 months and decrease of LDL cholesterol at 3 months while total cholesterol was significantly suppressed at 3 and 12 months [corrected]. The atherogenic index, LDL/HDL cholesterol was significantly reduced by 12 months. Both groups had no change in hemoglobin, hematocrit and total protein levels but alkaline phosphatase, bilirubin and aspartate transaminase (SGOT) were suppressed. While NET/EE suppressed albumin significantly, this was not observed with LNG/EE group. However, these differences observed with use of each pill preparations, were not so obvious between treatment groups and control. Changes in total, HDL and LDL cholesterol and SGOT were not significantly different than the IUD group. Furthermore, except for 2h glucose, there was no increase in the number of abnormal parameters after treatment. On the contrary, there was a reduction of abnormal values in most liver function parameters. Thus, except for glucose intolerance, the observed changes in metabolic parameters may not constitute any clinical significance.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

The effect of the contraceptive pill on blood pressure: a randomized controlled trial of three progestogen-oestrogen combinations in Szeged, Hungary

As part of an international multicentered investigation a double-blind comparative clinical trial was conducted at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical School, Szeged, Hungary, in order to study the effect of different combined oral contraceptives on blood pressure. Healthy, normotensive women were randomly allocated to either of the following oral contraceptives: 250 micrograms levonorgestrel + 50 micrograms ethinyloestradiol (LN 250 + EE 50), 250 micrograms levonorgestrel + 30 micrograms ethinyloestradiol (LN 250 + EE 30), 1 mg norethisterone acetate + 50 micrograms ethinyloestradiol (NA 1 + EE 50). Standardized blood pressure measurements were carried out at admission and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after admission. Blood pressure change from admission to subsequent visits was analysed in subjects who were seen by the same observer both at admission and the follow-up under consideration. The systolic blood pressure slightly but not significantly increased in groups LN 250 + EE 50 and NA 1 + EE 50, whereas the diastolic pressure showed a minimal decrease. In group LN 250 + EE 30 both systolic and diastolic blood pressure increased significantly (+5.58 and +3.20 mm Hg, respectively) at the 12-month follow-up. The study supports previous findings that combined oral contraceptive use is associated with a moderate rise in blood pressure. The progestogen-to-oestrogen ratio in the pill may be as important in this context as the dose of either component itself.     

Pharmacokinetics of oral contraceptive steroids in Egyptian women: studies with Ovral, Nordette and Norminest

Plasma concentration profiles and pharmacokinetic parameters have been obtained following single dose administration of three commonly used oral contraceptive steroid preparations, Ovral, Nordette and Norminest to Egyptian women. The constituents of the preparations are as follows: Ovral (50 micrograms ethinyloestradiol, EE2 and 500 micrograms levonorgestrel, LNG); Nordette (30 micrograms EE2 and 150 micrograms LNG); and Norminest (35 micrograms EE2 and 500 micrograms norethisterone, NOR). Peak plasma concentrations of EE2 ranged between 116-160 pg ml-1 for Ovral, 55-78 pg ml-1 for Norminest and 30-70 pg ml-1 for Nordette. There was no significant difference in half-life (t1/2), oral clearance (CL) or apparent volume of distribution (Vd). The relative values of the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) reflected well the different amounts of oestrogen in each preparation. There was no significant difference in t1/2, CL or Vd for LNG in the 2 preparations containing this progestogen. The mean AUC following Nordette (150 micrograms LNG) was 40% of that following Ovral (500 micrograms LNG; p less than 0.001). Comparing pharmacokinetic parameters for the same dose of LNG (Ovral) and NOR (Norminest) showed the AUC to be decreased and CL and Vd increased in the latter group. The study indicates that the kinetic profile of the OCS in healthy Egyptian women are similar to other ethnic populations.     

Time- and dose-dependent alterations of basal and LH-RH-stimulated LH-release during treatment with various hormonal contraceptives

The dose- and time-dependent effect of treatment with estrogen and progestogens on serum LH before and 15 min. after the i.v. injection of 150 ng LH-RH was investigated in intact female rats. The animals were injected s.c. daily with ethinyl estradiol (EE), levonorgestrel (NG), desogestrel (DG), norethisterone (NET), chlormadinone acetate (CMA) or cyproterone acetate (CPA) alone or in various combinations, and LH was measured after 1, 2, 3, and 4 weeks of treatment and 2 weeks after termination of the injections. The treatment with low- and high-dosed combined preparations caused a marked decrease of basal LH levels which was not reversed 2 weeks after discontinuation. The combination of 30 and 50 micrograms EE with 125 or 250 micrograms NG was more effective in depressing LH-RH-induced LH release than that with 125 or 250 micrograms DG which were, however, reversible in all cases. The increase in the estrogen dose intensified the suppressive effect to a greater extent than the doubling of the progestogen dose. The suppression of the LH-RH-stimulated LH release occurred in a time-dependent manner; there was, however, a transitory amplification after 1 week when 50 micrograms EE/125 micrograms DG were tested. The high-dosed combinations of 50 micrograms EE with 500 micrograms NG, 2 mg NET, 2 mg CMA or 2 mg CPA brought about a very strong blockade of both basal and LH-RH-induced LH secretion which persisted 2 weeks after termination of treatment. The results indicate that even minor alterations in the doses of the estrogen and progestogen components of combined oral contraceptives (OC) may lead to considerable differences in the functional stage of the gonadotrophs which also depend on the duration of treatment.     

Cycle control, quality of life and acne with two low-dose oral contraceptives containing 20 microg ethinylestradiol

OBJECTIVES: Poor cycle control and tolerability can be reasons for irregular pill intake. This study compared the tolerability of two low-dose oral contraceptives and their effect on cycle control. METHODS: In this open, group-comparative, randomized multicenter trial in Germany and the Netherlands, women received either 20 microg ethinylestradiol plus 150 microg desogestrel (20EE/DSG; n = 500) or 20 microg ethinylestradiol plus 100 microg levonorgestrel (20EE/LNG; n = 498) for six treatment cycles. Cycle control, dysmenorrhea and premenstrual syndrome (PMS) were assessed using diary cards. Tolerability was assessed using the self-administered questionnaires Psychological General Well-Being Index (PGWBI) and the Profile of Mood States (POMS). Acne was assessed by objective (acne counts) and subjective (no, moderate, mild, severe) acne scoring of the facial area at baseline and treatment cycles 1, 3 and 6. RESULTS: A total of 404 (78.1%) and 384 (75.3%) women in the 20EE/DSG and 20EE/LNG groups, respectively, completed the trial. The occurrence rate of irregular bleeding and spotting was statistically significantly higher with 20EE/LNG than with 20EE/DSG (0.18 vs. 0.13; p < 0.05). The mean number of bleeding-spotting days per cycle was statistically significantly higher with 20EE/LNG than with 20EE/DSG (0.63 vs. 0.48; p < 0.05). Early withdrawal bleeding was more frequent with 20EE/LNG (0.15 vs. 0.08; p < 0.005), whereas continued withdrawal bleeding was more frequent with 20EE/DSG (0.32 vs. 0.45; p < 0.001); absence of withdrawal bleeding was comparable (0.06 vs. 0.04, respectively). Thirteen subjects in the 20EE/LNG group and three in the 20EE/DSG group discontinued due to unacceptable bleeding (p < 0.05). Dysmenorrhea and PMS decreased comparably in both groups. There were no differences between groups for the mean total scores of PGWBI or POMS at all time-points. Fewer acne lesions were counted with 20EE/DSG vs. 20EE/LNG after six cycles (p < 0.05). The subjective acne scores supported this finding. CONCLUSIONS: 20EE/DSG provided better cycle control than 20EE/LNG with less treatment discontinuation due to unacceptable bleeding. There were no apparent differences between the two groups regarding tolerability and quality of life. There was less acne with 20EE/DSG.     

Effect of low-dose oral contraceptives on androgenic markers and acne

Oral contraceptives (OC) suppress excess androgen production; however, different progestins in combination with low-dose estrogens produce divergent effects on sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) and testosterone that may influence clinical outcomes. This multicenter, open-label, randomized study compared biochemical androgen profiles and clinical outcomes associated with two OC containing the same amounts of ethinyl estradiol (EE, 20 micrograms) but different progestins, levonorgestrel (LNG, 100 micrograms), and norethindrone acetate (NETA, 1000 micrograms). Fifty-eight healthy women (18-28 years old) received three cycles of treatment with LNG/EE (n = 30) or NETA/EE (n = 28). The results showed that LNG reduced androgen levels in three compartments--adrenal, ovarian, and peripheral. NETA reduced only adrenal and peripheral androgens. Despite a 2.2-fold greater relative increase in SHBG with NETA than LNG, bioavailable testosterone (T) was reduced by the same amount with LNG and NETA. Both treatments improved acne and were well tolerated. Low-dose OC (EE, 20 micrograms) are effective in reducing circulating androgens and acne lesions without causing weight gain. Although LNG and NETA affected secondary markers differently, both OC formulations produced an equivalent decrease in bioavailable.     

A comparative study of monophasic oral contraceptives containing either drospirenone 3 mg or levonorgestrel 150 microg on premenstrual symptoms

This open-label randomized study compared the effects of two combined oral contraceptives (OCs) containing 3 mg drospirenone (DRSP)/30 microg ethinyl estradiol (EE) with 150 microg levonorgestrel (LNG)/30 microg EE on the prevalence and changes from baseline of premenstrual symptoms after six cycles. The symptoms were measured using the Women's Health Assessment Questionnaire. Subjects receiving DRSP/EE had fewer prevalence of premenstrual symptoms than those receiving LNG/EE after six cycles. A significantly lower score of negative affect category in the premenstrual phase was demonstrated in those receiving DRSP/EE more than LNG/EE. The DRSP/EE group showed a greater improvement of mean scores from baseline in the premenstrual phase compared with those who received LNG/EE on negative affect as seen in the items on anxiety, irritability, feeling sad or blue and weight gain in the category of water retention. In conclusion, OCs containing DRSP have beneficial effects in reducing the prevalence of premenstrual symptoms especially the symptoms of negative affect and weight gain, particularly when compared to LNG/EE. Hence, it should be recommended for women who are susceptible to these adverse symptoms.     

Review of clinical experience with estradiol in combined oral contraceptives

Previous attempts to replace ethinylestradiol (EE) with 17β-estradiol (E2) in combined oral contraceptives (COCs) have proved unsatisfactory in terms of bleeding outcomes. A review of previous studies of E2-based COCs has shown that, despite good ovulation inhibition, bleeding irregularities affected up to 100% of women, often resulting in high rates of discontinuation (up to 42%). Suggested reasons for the bleeding irregularities observed with these predominantly monophasic estradiol-progestin preparations included suboptimal doses of E2 and an inappropriate estrogen/progestin ratio. The progestin used in the investigated formulations (e.g., norethisterone acetate, desogestrel and cyproterone acetate) may also have affected the overall bleeding profile. More recent studies of a multiphasic COC containing estradiol valerate (E2V) and dienogest (DNG) indicate efficient ovulation inhibition and acceptable cycle control. In a randomized, double-blind trial that compared E2V/DNG with a monophasic COC comprising EE/levonorgestrel (LNG), the occurrence of scheduled withdrawal bleeding per cycle with E2V/DNG and EE/LNG was 77.7-83.2% and 89.5-93.8%, respectively. The intensity and duration of withdrawal bleeding was reduced with E2V/DNG. The incidence of intracyclic bleeding was similar with E2V/DNG (10.5-18.6%) and EE/LNG (9.9-17.1%). This review shows that after several unsatisfactory attempts to develop E2-based COCs, more recent studies employing endometrial-focused progestins, e.g., DNG, and multiphasic dosing regimens appear to be a promising approach for an E2-based COC that provides efficient ovulation inhibition and acceptable cycle control.