Recommended Joint and Meta‐Analysis Strategies for Case‐Control Association Testing of Single Low‐Count Variants

In genome‐wide association studies of binary traits, investigators typically use logistic regression to test common variants for disease association within studies, and combine association results across studies using meta‐analysis. For common variants, logistic regression tests are well calibrated, and meta‐analysis of study‐specific association results is only slightly less powerful than joint analysis of the combined individual‐level data. In recent sequencing and dense chip based association studies, investigators increasingly test low‐frequency variants for disease association. In this paper, we seek to (1) identify the association test with maximal power among tests with well controlled type I error rate and (2) compare the relative power of joint and meta‐analysis tests. We use analytic calculation and simulation to compare the empirical type I error rate and power of four logistic regression based tests: Wald, score, likelihood ratio, and Firth bias‐corrected. We demonstrate for low‐count variants (roughly minor allele count [MAC] < 400) that: (1) for joint analysis, the Firth test has the best combination of type I error and power; (2) for meta‐analysis of balanced studies (equal numbers of cases and controls), the score test is best, but is less powerful than Firth test based joint analysis; and (3) for meta‐analysis of sufficiently unbalanced studies, all four tests can be anti‐conservative, particularly the score test. We also establish MAC as the key parameter determining test calibration for joint and meta‐analysis.     

Meta‐Analysis of Sequencing Studies With Heterogeneous Genetic Associations

Recent advances in sequencing technologies have made it possible to explore the influence of rare variants on complex diseases and traits. Meta‐analysis is essential to this exploration because large sample sizes are required to detect rare variants. Several methods are available to conduct meta‐analysis for rare variants under fixed‐effects models, which assume that the genetic effects are the same across all studies. In practice, genetic associations are likely to be heterogeneous among studies because of differences in population composition, environmental factors, phenotype and genotype measurements, or analysis method. We propose random‐effects models which allow the genetic effects to vary among studies and develop the corresponding meta‐analysis methods for gene‐level association tests. Our methods take score statistics, rather than individual participant data, as input and thus can accommodate any study designs and any phenotypes. We produce the random‐effects versions of all commonly used gene‐level association tests, including burden, variable threshold, and variance‐component tests. We demonstrate through extensive simulation studies that our random‐effects tests are substantially more powerful than the fixed‐effects tests in the presence of moderate and high between‐study heterogeneity and achieve similar power to the latter when the heterogeneity is low. The usefulness of the proposed methods is further illustrated with data from National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Exome Sequencing Project (NHLBI ESP). The relevant software is freely available.     

Imputation aware meta‐analysis of genome‐wide association studies

Genome‐wide association studies have recently identified many new loci associated with human complex diseases. These newly discovered variants typically have weak effects requiring studies with large numbers of individuals to achieve the statistical power necessary to identify them. Likely, there exist even more associated variants, which remain to be found if even larger association studies can be assembled. Meta‐analysis provides a straightforward means of increasing study sample sizes without collecting new samples by combining existing data sets. One obstacle to combining studies is that they are often performed on platforms with different marker sets. Current studies overcome this issue by imputing genotypes missing from each of the studies and then performing standard meta‐analysis techniques. We show that this approach may result in a loss of power since errors in imputation are not accounted for. We present a new method for performing meta‐analysis over imputed single nucleotide polymorphisms, show that it is optimal with respect to power, and discuss practical implementation issues. Through simulation experiments, we show that our imputation aware meta‐analysis approach outperforms or matches standard meta‐analysis approaches. Genet. Epidemiol. 34: 537–542, 2010. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Leveraging population information in family‐based rare variant association analyses of quantitative traits

Confounding due to population substructure is always a concern in genetic association studies. Although methods have been proposed to adjust for population stratification in the context of common variation, it is unclear how well these approaches will work when interrogating rare variation. Family‐based association tests can be constructed that are robust to population stratification. For example, when considering a quantitative trait, a linear model can be used that decomposes genetic effects into between‐ and within‐family components and a test of the within‐family component is robust to population stratification. However, this within‐family test ignores between‐family information potentially leading to a loss of power. Here, we propose a family‐based two‐stage rare‐variant test for quantitative traits. We first construct a weight for each variant within a gene, or other genetic unit, based on score tests of between‐family effect parameters. These weights are then used to combine variants using score tests of within‐family effect parameters. Because the between‐family and within‐family tests are orthogonal under the null hypothesis, this two‐stage approach can increase power while still maintaining validity. Using simulation, we show that this two‐stage test can significantly improve power while correctly maintaining type I error. We further show that the two‐stage approach maintains the robustness to population stratification of the within‐family test and we illustrate this using simulations reflecting samples composed of continental and closely related subpopulations.     

The Role of Environmental Heterogeneity in Meta‐Analysis of Gene–Environment Interactions With Quantitative Traits

With challenges in data harmonization and environmental heterogeneity across various data sources, meta‐analysis of gene–environment interaction studies can often involve subtle statistical issues. In this paper, we study the effect of environmental covariate heterogeneity (within and between cohorts) on two approaches for fixed‐effect meta‐analysis: the standard inverse‐variance weighted meta‐analysis and a meta‐regression approach. Akin to the results in Simmonds and Higgins ( 2007 ), we obtain analytic efficiency results for both methods under certain assumptions. The relative efficiency of the two methods depends on the ratio of within versus between cohort variability of the environmental covariate. We propose to use an adaptively weighted estimator (AWE), between meta‐analysis and meta‐regression, for the interaction parameter. The AWE retains full efficiency of the joint analysis using individual level data under certain natural assumptions. Lin and Zeng (2010a, b) showed that a multivariate inverse‐variance weighted estimator retains full efficiency as joint analysis using individual level data, if the estimates with full covariance matrices for all the common parameters are pooled across all studies. We show consistency of our work with Lin and Zeng (2010a, b). Without sacrificing much efficiency, the AWE uses only univariate summary statistics from each study, and bypasses issues with sharing individual level data or full covariance matrices across studies. We compare the performance of the methods both analytically and numerically. The methods are illustrated through meta‐analysis of interaction between Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms in FTO gene and body mass index on high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol data from a set of eight studies of type 2 diabetes.     

Marbled Inflation From Population Structure in Gene‐Based Association Studies With Rare Variants

Accurate genetic association studies are crucial for the detection and the validation of disease determinants. One of the main confounding factors that affect accuracy is population stratification, and great efforts have been extended for the past decade to detect and to adjust for it. We have now efficient solutions for population stratification adjustment for single‐SNP (where SNP is single‐nucleotide polymorphisms) inference in genome‐wide association studies, but it is unclear whether these solutions can be effectively applied to rare variation studies and in particular gene‐based (or set‐based) association methods that jointly analyze multiple rare and common variants. We examine here, both theoretically and empirically, the performance of two commonly used approaches for population stratification adjustment—genomic control and principal component analysis—when used on gene‐based association tests. We show that, different from single‐SNP inference, genes with diverse composition of rare and common variants may suffer from population stratification to various extent. The inflation in gene‐level statistics could be impacted by the number and the allele frequency spectrum of SNPs in the gene, and by the gene‐based testing method used in the analysis. As a consequence, using a universal inflation factor as a genomic control should be avoided in gene‐based inference with sequencing data. We also demonstrate that caution needs to be exercised when using principal component adjustment because the accuracy of the adjusted analyses depends on the underlying population substructure, on the way the principal components are constructed, and on the number of principal components used to recover the substructure.     

Meta‐analysis approaches to combine multiple gene set enrichment studies

In the field of gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA), meta‐analysis has been used to integrate information from multiple studies to present a reliable summarization of the expanding volume of individual biomedical research, as well as improve the power of detecting essential gene sets involved in complex human diseases. However, existing methods, Meta‐Analysis for Pathway Enrichment (MAPE), may be subject to power loss because of (1) using gross summary statistics for combining end results from component studies and (2) using enrichment scores whose distributions depend on the set sizes. In this paper, we adapt meta‐analysis approaches recently developed for genome‐wide association studies, which are based on fixed effect and random effects (RE) models, to integrate multiple GSEA studies. We further develop a mixed strategy via adaptive testing for choosing RE versus FE models to achieve greater statistical efficiency as well as flexibility. In addition, a size‐adjusted enrichment score based on a one‐sided Kolmogorov‐Smirnov statistic is proposed to formally account for varying set sizes when testing multiple gene sets. Our methods tend to have much better performance than the MAPE methods and can be applied to both discrete and continuous phenotypes. Specifically, the performance of the adaptive testing method seems to be the most stable in general situations.     

Using imputed genotype data in the joint score tests for genetic association and gene–environment interactions in case‐control studies

Genome‐wide association studies (GWAS) are now routinely imputed for untyped single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) based on various powerful statistical algorithms for imputation trained on reference datasets. The use of predicted allele counts for imputed SNPs as the dosage variable is known to produce valid score test for genetic association. In this paper, we investigate how to best handle imputed SNPs in various modern complex tests for genetic associations incorporating gene–environment interactions. We focus on case‐control association studies where inference for an underlying logistic regression model can be performed using alternative methods that rely on varying degree on an assumption of gene–environment independence in the underlying population. As increasingly large‐scale GWAS are being performed through consortia effort where it is preferable to share only summary‐level information across studies, we also describe simple mechanisms for implementing score tests based on standard meta‐analysis of “one‐step” maximum‐likelihood estimates across studies. Applications of the methods in simulation studies and a dataset from GWAS of lung cancer illustrate ability of the proposed methods to maintain type‐I error rates for the underlying testing procedures. For analysis of imputed SNPs, similar to typed SNPs, the retrospective methods can lead to considerable efficiency gain for modeling of gene–environment interactions under the assumption of gene–environment independence. Methods are made available for public use through CGEN R software package.     

Generalized Functional Linear Models for Gene‐Based Case‐Control Association Studies

By using functional data analysis techniques, we developed generalized functional linear models for testing association between a dichotomous trait and multiple genetic variants in a genetic region while adjusting for covariates. Both fixed and mixed effect models are developed and compared. Extensive simulations show that Rao's efficient score tests of the fixed effect models are very conservative since they generate lower type I errors than nominal levels, and global tests of the mixed effect models generate accurate type I errors. Furthermore, we found that the Rao's efficient score test statistics of the fixed effect models have higher power than the sequence kernel association test (SKAT) and its optimal unified version (SKAT‐O) in most cases when the causal variants are both rare and common. When the causal variants are all rare (i.e., minor allele frequencies less than 0.03), the Rao's efficient score test statistics and the global tests have similar or slightly lower power than SKAT and SKAT‐O. In practice, it is not known whether rare variants or common variants in a gene region are disease related. All we can assume is that a combination of rare and common variants influences disease susceptibility. Thus, the improved performance of our models when the causal variants are both rare and common shows that the proposed models can be very useful in dissecting complex traits. We compare the performance of our methods with SKAT and SKAT‐O on real neural tube defects and Hirschsprung's disease datasets. The Rao's efficient score test statistics and the global tests are more sensitive than SKAT and SKAT‐O in the real data analysis. Our methods can be used in either gene‐disease genome‐wide/exome‐wide association studies or candidate gene analyses.     

Pathway‐Based Approaches for Sequencing‐Based Genome‐Wide Association Studies

For analyzing complex trait association with sequencing data, most current studies test aggregated effects of variants in a gene or genomic region. Although gene‐based tests have insufficient power even for moderately sized samples, pathway‐based analyses combine information across multiple genes in biological pathways and may offer additional insight. However, most existing pathway association methods are originally designed for genome‐wide association studies, and are not comprehensively evaluated for sequencing data. Moreover, region‐based rare variant association methods, although potentially applicable to pathway‐based analysis by extending their region definition to gene sets, have never been rigorously tested. In the context of exome‐based studies, we use simulated and real datasets to evaluate pathway‐based association tests. Our simulation strategy adopts a genome‐wide genetic model that distributes total genetic effects hierarchically into pathways, genes, and individual variants, allowing the evaluation of pathway‐based methods with realistic quantifiable assumptions on the underlying genetic architectures. The results show that, although no single pathway‐based association method offers superior performance in all simulated scenarios, a modification of Gene Set Enrichment Analysis approach using statistics from single‐marker tests without gene‐level collapsing (weighted Kolmogrov‐Smirnov [WKS]‐Variant method) is consistently powerful. Interestingly, directly applying rare variant association tests (e.g., sequence kernel association test) to pathway analysis offers a similar power, but its results are sensitive to assumptions of genetic architecture. We applied pathway association analysis to an exome‐sequencing data of the chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and found that the WKS‐Variant method confirms associated genes previously published.