免疫检查点抑制剂的风湿性免疫相关不良反应与治疗

免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)在癌症治疗中显示出较好的疗效,但随着ICIs的快速应用,免疫相关不良事件(irAE)也越来越引起人们的关注。几乎全身器官皆可发生irAE,但风湿性irAE似乎具有不同的临床特征。本文就ICIs治疗引起的风湿性irAE的流行病学、临床特征及管理原则进行综述,并探讨其可能的潜在致病机制。     

免疫检查点抑制剂的免疫相关不良事件预测生物标志物研究进展

近年来,以免疫检查点为靶点的肿瘤免疫疗法因疗效显著而备受关注.然而随着免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)的推广应用,其相关不良事件(irAEs)的报道也越来越多.irAEs使接受ICIs治疗的肿瘤患者承担着额外的致命风险,限制着ICIs的使用.为帮助患者主动预防irAEs,研究具有irAEs预测价值的生物标志物意义重大.本文...     

20例晚期肿瘤患者免疫检查点抑制剂不良反应临床观察并文献复习

目的观察免疫检查点抑制剂治疗的相关不良反应。方法回顾性分析2017年3月—2019年8月在中国医学科学院肿瘤医院进行免疫检查点抑制剂治疗的20例晚期肿瘤患者临床资料,总结免疫检查点抑制剂治疗的相关不良反应。结果 20例患者免疫治疗中位时间为4.0月,发生较明确免疫治疗相关不良反应的共6例,中位时间5.3月,其中1例发生Ⅰ级免疫性胃肠炎,1例Ⅰ级免疫性皮炎,1例Ⅱ级免疫性甲状腺炎,1例Ⅲ级免疫性肝炎,1例Ⅲ级免疫性肺炎及1例Ⅳ级免疫性肺炎。结论伴随免疫治疗的相关不良反应发生率较高,严重的不良反应甚至危及生命,故免疫相关不良反应的早发现、早诊断及早干预至关重要。     

Sarcoidosis-Like Reactions Induced by Checkpoint Inhibitors

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are a newly developed component of cancer care that expands the treatment possibilities for patients. Their use has been associated with several immune-related adverse events, including ICI-induced sarcoidosis-like reactions. This article reviews the data concerning ICI-induced sarcoidosis-like reactions currently available in the medical literature. These reactions have been reported in three classes of ICIs: anti–cytotoxic T-lymphocyte associated protein 4 antibodies, programmed death 1 inhibitors and programmed death ligand 1 inhibitors. These reactions are indistinguishable from sarcoidosis with a similar histology, pattern of organ involvement, and pattern of clinical manifestations. The most common locations to observe granulomatous inflammation from these reactions is in intrathoracic locations (the lung and/or mediastinal lymph nodes) and the skin. The median time between initiation of an ICI and the development of a sarcoidosis-like reaction averaged 14 weeks. Clinicians have opted to use corticosteroids and/or discontinue the ICI, or take no action when these reactions have developed. Regardless of whether the clinician performed an intervention or not, these reactions have uniformly improved or resolved after ICI-treatment, which provides additional temporal evidence supporting the presence of a sarcoidosis-like reaction as opposed to sarcoidosis. There is even evidence that the development of an ICI-induced sarcoidosis-like reaction suggests that the ICI is effective as an anti-tumor agent and should be continued. As is the case for sarcoidosis, sarcoidosis-like reactions do not mandate antisarcoidosis therapy, especially if the condition is asymptomatic. When treatment of sarcoidosis-like reaction is required, it may be prudent to continue ICI therapy and add antisarcoidosis therapy because standard antisarcoidosis regimens seem to be effective. Further research into the mechanisms involved in the development of ICI-induced sarcoidosis-like reactions may give insights into the immunopathogenesis of sarcoidosis.     

Safety of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Patients with Cancer and Hepatitis C Virus Infection

BackgroundThe safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection has not been studied in many cancers, as these patients were excluded from most ICI trials. This poses a degree of uncertainty when a patient with HCV is being considered for ICIs in the absence of data to inform potential adverse events (AEs).Materials and MethodsThis was a single‐institution retrospective chart review of patients with active or resolved HCV who were treated with ICIs for cancer of any type and stage from January 2012 to December 2019, with emphasis on AE rates.ResultsWe identified 40 patients, 30 men and 10 women. Median age was 64 years. Cancer types were non‐small cell lung cancer (18; 45%), hepatocellular carcinoma (12; 30%), head and neck cancer (4; 10%), small cell lung cancer (3; 7.5%), renal cell carcinoma (1; 2.5%), colon cancer (1; 2.5%), and melanoma (12.5%). Hepatitis C was untreated in 17 patients (42.5%), treated in 14 (35%), and spontaneously resolved in 9 (22.5%). AEs observed were grade 3 pneumonitis in one patient (2.5%) on pembrolizumab; grade 3 colitis in one patient (2.5%) on nivolumab; hepatotoxicity in two patients (5%) on nivolumab: one patient with grade 1 and the other with grade 2; grade 1–2 fatigue in three patients (7.5%); and hypothyroidism in one patient (2.5%).ConclusionAdverse events rates in patients with untreated and resolved HCV treated with ICI for a variety of cancers were comparable with AEs rates reported in clinical trials for patients without HCV.Implications for PracticeThe safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in patients with cancer with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is a major concern because of the lack of prospective safety data for most cancers. HCV is prevalent worldwide, and the occurrence of cancer where ICI is indicated is not uncommon. This study was a retrospective review of all patients with HCV who received ICI for a variety of cancers in the authors’ institution over 8 years, and the results are presented in this article. The results may help inform clinical decisions and the design of future clinical trials.     

Immune-Related Adverse Events as Clinical Biomarkers in Patients with Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Treated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

Background

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are an important treatment for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). These agents may cause immune-related adverse events (irAEs), and the relationship between irAEs and outcomes is poorly understood. We investigated the association between irAEs and clinical outcomes in patients with mRCC treated with ICIs.

Methods

We performed a retrospective study of 200 patients with mRCC treated with ICIs at Winship Cancer Institute from 2015 to 2020. Data on irAEs were collected from clinic notes and laboratory values and grades were determined using Common Terminology Criteria in Adverse Events version 5.0. The association with overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) was modeled by Cox proportional hazards model. Logistic regression models were used to define odds ratios (ORs) for clinical benefit (CB). Landmark analysis and extended Cox models were used to mitigate lead-time bias by treating irAEs as a time-varying covariate.

Results

Most patients (71.0%) were male, and one-third of patients (33.0%) experienced at least one irAE, most commonly involving the endocrine glands (13.0%), gastrointestinal tract (10.5%), or skin (10.0%). Patients who experienced irAEs had significantly longer OS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.52; p = .013), higher chance of CB (OR, 2.10; p = .023) and showed a trend toward longer PFS (HR, 0.71; p = .065) in multivariate analysis. Patients who had endocrine irAEs, particularly thyroid irAEs, had significantly longer OS and PFS and higher chance of CB. In a 14-week landmark analysis, irAEs were significantly associated with prolonged OS (p = .045). Patients who experienced irAEs had significantly longer median OS (44.5 vs. 18.2 months, p = .005) and PFS (7.5 vs. 3.6 months, p = .003) without landmark compared with patients who did not.

Conclusion

We found that patients with mRCC treated with ICIs who experienced irAEs, particularly thyroid irAEs, had significantly improved clinical outcomes compared with patients who did not have irAEs. This suggests that irAEs may be effective clinical biomarkers in patients with mRCC treated with ICIs. Future prospective studies are warranted to validate these findings.

Implications for Practice

This study found that early onset immune-related adverse events (irAEs) are associated with significantly improved clinical outcomes in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). In this site-specific irAE analysis, endocrine irAEs, particularly thyroid irAEs, were significantly associated with improved clinical outcomes. These results have implications for practicing medical oncologists given the increasing use of ICIs for the treatment of mRCC. Importantly, these results suggest that early irAEs and thyroid irAEs at any time on treatment with ICIs may be clinical biomarkers of clinical outcomes in patients with mRCC treated with ICIs.

     

Myalgia and Arthralgia Immune-related Adverse Events (irAEs) in Patients With Genitourinary Malignancies Treated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

BackgroundMyalgia and arthralgia immune-related adverse events (irAEs) in patients treated with checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) present a clinical challenge. We describe the clinical characteristics and treatment of myalgia and arthralgia irAEs in CPI-treated patients with genitourinary (GU) malignancies.Patients and MethodsPatients with GU malignancies who were treated with CPIs and developed myalgia and arthralgia irAEs that resulted in interruption or discontinuation of CPI therapy were reviewed. Patient-, disease-, and irAE-related data were collected and analyzed.ResultsTwenty-one patients were identified. Eighteen (86%) had renal cell carcinoma; 3 (14%) had urothelial carcinoma. The majority (71%) were male; the median age at diagnosis was 56 years (range, 36-78 years). CPI therapy included anti-programmed death-ligand 1 (29%), anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (48%), and combined programmed cell death protein 1/cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 antibodies (24%). The median time from CPI initiation to myalgia and arthralgia irAE was 5.1 months (range, 0.23-50.5 months). All patients were treated with prednisone with a median initial dose of 40 mg/d (range, 10-90 mg/d) for a median duration of 64 weeks (range, 3-242 weeks). Treatment with methotrexate (14%), infliximab (14%), tocilizumab (10%), gabapentin (10%), and etanercept (5%) was also required in some patients. Six (29%) patients restarted CPI therapy following symptom improvement, 3 (15%) switched to a subsequent therapy, and 12 (55%) patients had an ongoing sustained response to therapy (median, 14.5 months; range, 3-55 months) despite no subsequent anti-cancer therapy.ConclusionMyalgia and arthralgia irAEs in CPI-treated patients with GU malignancies vary in timing of presentation, severity, and treatment. Multidisciplinary teams that include a rheumatologist are critical for optimal management. Durable response to CPIs can be maintained even after therapy discontinuation.     

Immune-Related Adverse Events by Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Significantly Predict Durable Efficacy Even in Responders with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Background

Although predictive value of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been suggested by several studies, their assessments were insufficient because patients were categorized only by the occurrence of irAEs. It has not been elucidated whether irAEs also play a significant role even in responders.

Materials and Methods

Between December 2015 and September 2018, 106 patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with ICIs were enrolled in our prospective biomarker study. Twenty-three of these were responders, defined as those with complete or partial response. We investigated the proportion of irAEs among overall and responders. For responders, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival of ICIs were compared between those with and without irAEs. As an exploratory analysis, we measured 41 proteins from peripheral blood before and after ICI treatment.

Results

The proportion of irAEs was significantly higher in responders than nonresponders (65.2% vs. 19.3%, p < .01). Among responders, clinical characteristics did not differ regardless of the occurrence of irAEs. However, there was a significant difference in PFS among responders (irAE group 19.1 months vs. non-irAE group 5.6 months; hazard ratio: 0.30 [95% confidence interval: 0.10–0.85]; p = .02). Of 41 protein analyses, fibroblast growth factor-2 at baseline and monocyte chemoattractant protein fold change showed significant differences between them (p < .04).

Conclusion

Although this is a small sample–sized study, irAE might be a predictive factor of durable efficacy, even in patients who responded to ICIs. Investigation into the significance of irAEs in responders will contribute to the establishment of optimal administration of ICI.

Implications for Practice

Although the predictive value of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has been suggested by several studies, it has not been elucidated whether irAEs also play a significant role even in responders. This study showed that more than 60% of responders had irAEs. It demonstrated the strong correlation between irAEs and efficacy even in responders. Investigation into the significance of irAEs in responders will contribute to the establishment of optimal administration of ICI.

     

Consider Myocarditis When Patients Treated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Present with Ocular Symptoms

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been associated with neurological immune related adverse events (irAE-N) and patients with ICI toxicity may present with neurological or ocular symptoms. Furthermore, patients on ICI may initially present to oncology or neurology. We report a case series of 3 patients treated with ICIs presenting with diplopia or ptosis, found to have concurrent myocarditis in addition to immune-related myopathy (irMyopathy) or myasthenia gravis (irMG). None of the patients described cardiac symptoms, underscoring the importance of screening for myocarditis in patients presenting with diplopia and/or other neuromuscular symptoms which may suggest either irMyopathy or irMG.     

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Thoracic Malignancies: Review of the Existing Evidence by an IASLC Expert Panel and Recommendations

In the past 10 years, a deeper understanding of the immune landscape of cancers, including immune evasion processes, has allowed the development of a new class of agents. The reactivation of host antitumor immune response offers the potential for long-term survival benefit in a portion of patients with thoracic malignancies.The advent of programmed cell death protein 1/programmed death ligand-1 immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), both as single agents and in combination with chemotherapy, and more recently, the combination of ICI, anti–programmed cell death protein 1, and anticytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 antibody, have led to breakthrough therapeutic advances for patients with advanced NSCLC, and to a lesser extent, patients with SCLC. Encouraging activity has recently emerged in pretreated patients with thymic carcinoma (TC). Conversely, in malignant pleural mesothelioma, pivotal positive signs of activity have not been fully confirmed in randomized trials. The additive effects of chemoradiation and immunotherapy suggested intriguing potential for therapeutic synergy with combination strategies. This has led to the introduction of ICI consolidation therapy in stage III NSCLC, creating a platform for future therapeutic developments in earlier-stage disease. Despite the definitive clinical benefit observed with ICI, primary and acquired resistance represent well-known biological phenomena, which may affect the therapeutic efficacy of these agents.The development of innovative strategies to overcome ICI resistance, standardization of new patterns of ICI progression, identification of predictive biomarkers of response, optimal treatment duration, and characterization of ICI efficacy in special populations, represent crucial issues to be adequately addressed, with the aim of improving the therapeutic benefit of ICI in patients with thoracic malignancies.In this article, an international panel of experts in the field of thoracic malignancies discussed these topics, evaluating currently available scientific evidence, with the final aim of providing clinical recommendations, which may guide oncologists in their current practice and elucidate future treatment strategies and research priorities.     

Efficacy of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in SMARCA4-Deficient Thoracic Tumor

BackgroundSMARCA4-deficient thoracic tumor is a novel disease entity characterized by mutations in SMARCA4 resulting in loss of its expression. They could be divided according to their phenotypes; carcinoma or sarcomatoid. It remains unclear how many patients with these SMARCA4-deficient tumors could benefit from inhibitors of programmed death 1 (PD-1) or programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1).MethodsSMARCA4-deficient thoracic tumor cases were retrospectively identified from pathology and gene expression databases at the National Cancer Center Hospital in Japan. Clinical outcomes of patients treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors were reviewed.ResultsEighteen patients with SMARCA4-deficient thoracic tumor [carcinoma (n = 10), sarcomatoid (n = 7), and ambiguous type (n = 1)] were identified. Of the twelve [carcinoma (n = 7), sarcomatoid (n = 5)] who had received immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), 5 [carcinoma (n = 3), sarcomatoid (n = 2)] showed a partial response, all of whom had received an ICI as the first-line therapy. The overall response rate was The PD-L1 tumor proportion scores of the 5 responding patients were 100%, 80%, 5% (n = 2), and less than 1%. The median progression-free survival (PFS) of all the patients was 2.4 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.1 months–not achieved (NA)], while the median PFS of the 3 patients who received first-line ICIs was not reached (95% CI, 1.1 months–NA).ConclusionPD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors showed promising results in the treatment of SMARCA4-deficient tumor. Further studies, especially on patient selection and combination therapy, are needed.