Genome‐scale CRISPR screening identifies cell cycle and protein ubiquitination processes as druggable targets for erlotinib‐resistant lung cancer

Erlotinib is highly effective in lung cancer patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations. However, despite initial favorable responses, most patients rapidly develop resistance to erlotinib soon after the initial treatment. This study aims to identify new genes and pathways associated with erlotinib resistance mechanisms in order to develop novel therapeutic strategies. Here, we induced knockout (KO) mutations in erlotinib‐resistant human lung cancer cells (NCI‐H820) using a genome‐scale CRISPR‐Cas9 sgRNA library to screen for genes involved in erlotinib susceptibility. The spectrum of sgRNAs incorporated among erlotinib‐treated cells was substantially different to that of the untreated cells. Gene set analyses showed a significant depletion of ‘cell cycle process’ and ‘protein ubiquitination pathway’ genes among erlotinib‐treated cells. Chemical inhibitors targeting genes in these two pathways, such as nutlin‐3 and carfilzomib, increased cancer cell death when combined with erlotinib in both in vitro cell line and in vivo patient‐derived xenograft experiments. Therefore, we propose that targeting cell cycle processes or protein ubiquitination pathways are promising treatment strategies for overcoming resistance to EGFR inhibitors in lung cancer.

Abbreviations

ATCC

American Type Culture Collection

edgeR

bioconductor software package for examining differential expression of replicated count data

EGFR

epidermal growth factor receptor

GeCKO

genome‐scale CRISPR/Cas9 knockout

HGF

hepatocyte growth factor

MAGeCK‐VISPR algorithm

comprehensive quality control analysis and visualization pipeline for CRISPR/Cas9 screens based on MAGeCK VISPR

MOI

multiplicity of infection

NSCLC

non‐small‐cell lung cancer

SCLC

small cell lung cancer

sgRNA

single‐guide RNA

TKIs

tyrosine kinase inhibitors

     

Comprehensive cross‐platform comparison of methods for non‐invasive EGFR mutation testing: results of the RING observational trial

Several platforms for noninvasive EGFR testing are currently used in the clinical setting with sensitivities ranging from 30% to 100%. Prospective studies evaluating agreement and sources for discordant results remain lacking. Herein, seven methodologies including two next‐generation sequencing (NGS)‐based methods, three high‐sensitivity PCR‐based platforms, and two FDA‐approved methods were compared using 72 plasma samples, from EGFR‐mutant non‐small‐cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients progressing on a first‐line tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI). NGS platforms as well as high‐sensitivity PCR‐based methodologies showed excellent agreement for EGFR‐sensitizing mutations (K = 0.80–0.89) and substantial agreement for T790M testing (K = 0.77 and 0.68, respectively). Mutant allele frequencies (MAFs) obtained by different quantitative methods showed an excellent reproducibility (intraclass correlation coefficients 0.86–0.98). Among other technical factors, discordant calls mostly occurred at mutant allele frequencies (MAFs) ≤ 0.5%. Agreement significantly improved when discarding samples with MAF ≤ 0.5%. EGFR mutations were detected at significantly lower MAFs in patients with brain metastases, suggesting that these patients risk for a false‐positive result. Our results support the use of liquid biopsies for noninvasive EGFR testing and highlight the need to systematically report MAFs.

Abbreviations

BEAMing

beads, emulsion, amplification, and magnetics

cfDNA

circulating free DNA, cell‐free DNA

cobas

cobas^® EGFR Mutation Test v2 (Roche Diagnostics)

ctDNA

circulating tumor DNA

CUSUM

cumulative sum

ddPCR

droplet digital polymerase chain reaction

dPCR

digital polymerase chain reaction

EGFR

epidermal growth factor receptor

FFPE

formalin‐fixed, paraffin‐embedded

ICC

intraclass correlation coefficient

MAF

mutant allele frequency

NGS platforms

Ion S5™ XL and GeneRead™

NGS

next‐generation sequencing

NSCLC

non‐small‐cell lung cancer

PNA‐Q‐PCR

peptic nucleic acid probe‐based real‐time polymerase chain reaction

Therascreen

Therascreen EGFR Plasma RGQ PCR Kit (QIAgen)

TKI

tyrosine kinase inhibitor

     

Circulating tumor cell detection and single‐cell analysis using an integrated workflow based on ChimeraX®‐i120 Platform: A prospective study

Circulating tumor cell (CTC) analysis holds great potential to be a noninvasive solution for clinical cancer management. A complete workflow that combined CTC detection and single‐cell molecular analysis is required. We developed the ChimeraX^®‐i120 platform to facilitate negative enrichment, immunofluorescent labeling, and machine learning‐based identification of CTCs. Analytical performances were evaluated, and a total of 477 participants were enrolled to validate the clinical feasibility of ChimeraX^®‐i120 CTC detection. We analyzed copy number alteration profiles of isolated single cells. The ChimeraX^®‐i120 platform had high sensitivity, accuracy, and reproducibility for CTC detection. In clinical samples, an average value of > 60% CTC‐positive rate was found for five cancer types (i.e., liver, biliary duct, breast, colorectal, and lung), while CTCs were rarely identified in blood from healthy donors. In hepatocellular carcinoma patients treated with curative resection, CTC status was significantly associated with tumor characteristics, prognosis, and treatment response (all P < 0.05). Single‐cell sequencing analysis revealed that heterogeneous genomic alteration patterns resided in different cells, patients, and cancers. Our results suggest that the use of this ChimeraX^®‐i120 platform and the integrated workflow has validity as a tool for CTC detection and downstream genomic profiling in the clinical setting.

Abbreviations

ADABOOST

AdaBoost classification trees

AFP

alpha‐fetoprotein

AUC

areas under the curve

BC

breast cancer

BCLC

barcelona clinic liver cancer

BHL

benign hepatic lesion

CCD

charge‐coupled device

CHB

chronic hepatitis B

CK

cytokeratin

CNA

copy number alteration

CNLC

Chinese staging for liver cancer

CRC

colorectal cancer

CTC

circulating tumor cell

CTM

circulating tumor microemboli

CV

coefficient of variation

DAPI

4’,6‐diamidine‐2’‐phenylindole dihydrochloride

EpCAM

epithelial cell adhesion molecule

FPR

false‐positive rate

GBM

stochastic gradient boosting

HCC

hepatocellular carcinoma

HD

healthy donor

ICC

intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

LC

liver cirrhosis

LCA

lung cancer

LOD

limit of detection

PBS

phosphate‐buffered saline

PCR

polymerase chain reaction

RF

random forest

ROC

receiver operating characteristic

SVM

support vector machines

TCGA

The Cancer Genome Atlas

TPR

true‐positive rate

TTR

time to recurrence

WBC

white blood cell

WGA

whole‐genome amplification

WGS

whole‐genome sequencing

XGB

extreme gradient boosting

     

Predicting osimertinib‐treatment outcomes through EGFR mutant‐fraction monitoring in the circulating tumor DNA of EGFR T790M‐positive patients with non‐small cell lung cancer (WJOG8815L)

The WJOG8815L phase II clinical study involves patients with non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) that harbored the EGFR T790M mutation, which confers resistance to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). The purpose of this study was to assess the predictive value of monitoring EGFR genomic alterations in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) from patients with NSCLC that undergo treatment with the third‐generation EGFR‐TKI osimertinib. Plasma samples of 52 patients harboring the EGFR T790M mutation were obtained pretreatment (Pre), on day 1 of treatment cycle 4 (C4) or cycle 9 (C9), and at diagnosis of disease progression or treatment discontinuation (PD/stop). CtDNA was screened for EGFR‐TKI‐sensitizing mutations, the EGFR T790M mutation, and other genomic alterations using the cobas EGFR Mutation Test v2 (cobas), droplet digital PCR (ddPCR), and targeted deep sequencing. Analysis of the sensitizing—and T790M—EGFR mutant fractions (MFs) was used to determine tumor mutational burden. Both MFs were found to decrease during treatment, whereas rebound of the sensitizing EGFR MF was observed at PD/stop, suggesting that osimertinib targeted both T790M mutation‐positive tumors and tumors with sensitizing EGFR mutations. Significant differences in the response rates and progression‐free survival were observed between the sensitizing EGFR MF‐high and sensitizing EGFR MF‐low groups (cutoff: median) at C4. In conclusion, ctDNA monitoring for sensitizing EGFR mutations at C4 is suitable for predicting the treatment outcomes in NSCLC patients receiving osimertinib (Clinical Trial Registration No.: UMIN000022076).

Abbreviations

CIs

confidence intervals

ctDNA

circulating tumor DNA

ddPCR

droplet digital PCR

EGFR

epidermal growth factor receptor

MFs

mutant fractions

NGS

next‐generation sequencing

NSCLC

non‐small cell lung cancer

ORR

overall response rate

OS

overall survival

PD

progressive disease

PFS

progression‐free survival

PR

partial response

SD

stable disease

TKI

tyrosine kinase inhibitor

     

Targeted inhibition of ERα signaling and PIP5K1α/Akt pathways in castration‐resistant prostate cancer

Selective ERα modulator, tamoxifen, is well tolerated in a heavily pretreated castration‐resistant prostate cancer (PCa) patient cohort. However, its targeted gene network and whether expression of intratumor ERα due to androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) may play a role in PCa progression is unknown. In this study, we examined the inhibitory effect of tamoxifen on castration‐resistant PCa in vitro and in vivo. We found that tamoxifen is a potent compound that induced a high degree of apoptosis and significantly suppressed growth of xenograft tumors in mice, at a degree comparable to ISA‐2011B, an inhibitor of PIP5K1α that acts upstream of PI3K/AKT survival signaling pathway. Moreover, depletion of tumor‐associated macrophages using clodronate in combination with tamoxifen increased inhibitory effect of tamoxifen on aggressive prostate tumors. We showed that both tamoxifen and ISA‐2011B exert their on‐target effects on prostate cancer cells by targeting cyclin D1 and PIP5K1α/AKT network and the interlinked estrogen signaling. Combination treatment using tamoxifen together with ISA‐2011B resulted in tumor regression and had superior inhibitory effect compared with that of tamoxifen or ISA‐2011B alone. We have identified sets of genes that are specifically targeted by tamoxifen, ISA‐2011B or combination of both agents by RNA‐seq. We discovered that alterations in unique gene signatures, in particular estrogen‐related marker genes are associated with poor patient disease‐free survival. We further showed that ERα interacted with PIP5K1α through formation of protein complexes in the nucleus, suggesting a functional link. Our finding is the first to suggest a new therapeutic potential to inhibit or utilize the mechanisms related to ERα, PIP5K1α/AKT network, and MMP9/VEGF signaling axis, providing a strategy to treat castration‐resistant ER‐positive subtype of prostate cancer tumors with metastatic potential.

Abbreviations

CRPC

castration‐resistant prostate cancer

DHT

dihydrotestosterone

E2

estradiol

ERα

estrogen receptor alpha

GO

gene ontology

NG‐CHM

Next‐Generation Clustered Heatmaps

PCa

prostate cancer

TMAs

tissue microarrays

     

Downregulation of Glutamine Synthetase,not glutaminolysis,is responsible for glutamine addiction in Notch1‐driven acute lymphoblastic leukemia

The cellular receptor Notch1 is a central regulator of T‐cell development, and as a consequence, Notch1 pathway appears upregulated in > 65% of the cases of T‐cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T‐ALL). However, strategies targeting Notch1 signaling render only modest results in the clinic due to treatment resistance and severe side effects. While many investigations reported the different aspects of tumor cell growth and leukemia progression controlled by Notch1, less is known regarding the modifications of cellular metabolism induced by Notch1 upregulation in T‐ALL. Previously, glutaminolysis inhibition has been proposed to synergize with anti‐Notch therapies in T‐ALL models. In this work, we report that Notch1 upregulation in T‐ALL induced a change in the metabolism of the important amino acid glutamine, preventing glutamine synthesis through the downregulation of glutamine synthetase (GS). Downregulation of GS was responsible for glutamine addiction in Notch1‐driven T‐ALL both in vitro and in vivo. Our results also confirmed an increase in glutaminolysis mediated by Notch1. Increased glutaminolysis resulted in the activation of the mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) pathway, a central controller of cell growth. However, glutaminolysis did not play any role in Notch1‐induced glutamine addiction. Finally, the combined treatment targeting mTORC1 and limiting glutamine availability had a synergistic effect to induce apoptosis and to prevent Notch1‐driven leukemia progression. Our results placed glutamine limitation and mTORC1 inhibition as a potential therapy against Notch1‐driven leukemia.

Abbreviations

7‐AAD

7‐Aminoactinomycin D

BPTES

bis‐2‐(5‐phenylacetamido‐1,2,4‐thiadiazol‐2‐yl)ethyl sulfide

DON

diazo‐5‐oxo‐L‐norleucine

ECAR

extracellular acidification rate

GDH

glutamate dehydrogenase

GLS

glutaminase

GS

glutamine synthetase

GSI

γ‐secretase inhibitor

MSO

L‐methionine sulfoximine

mTORC1

mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1

NICD

Notch intracellular domain

PI

propidium iodide

RAP

rapamycin

T‐ALL

T‐cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia

TCA

tricarboxylic acid

αKG

α‐ketoglutarate

     

EBP2, a novel NPM‐ALK‐interacting protein in the nucleolus,contributes to the proliferation of ALCL cells by regulating tumor suppressor p53

The oncogenic fusion protein nucleophosmin‐anaplastic lymphoma kinase (NPM‐ALK), found in anaplastic large‐cell lymphoma (ALCL), localizes to the cytosol, nucleoplasm, and nucleolus. However, the relationship between its localization and transforming activity remains unclear. We herein demonstrated that NPM‐ALK localized to the nucleolus by binding to nucleophosmin 1 (NPM1), a nucleolar protein that exhibits shuttling activity between the nucleolus and cytoplasm, in a manner that was dependent on its kinase activity. In the nucleolus, NPM‐ALK interacted with Epstein–Barr virus nuclear antigen 1‐binding protein 2 (EBP2), which is involved in rRNA biosynthesis. Moreover, enforced expression of NPM‐ALK induced tyrosine phosphorylation of EBP2. Knockdown of EBP2 promoted the activation of the tumor suppressor p53, leading to G₀/G₁‐phase cell cycle arrest in Ba/F3 cells transformed by NPM‐ALK and ALCL patient‐derived Ki‐JK cells, but not ALCL patient‐derived SUDH‐L1 cells harboring p53 gene mutation. In Ba/F3 cells transformed by NPM‐ALK and Ki‐JK cells, p53 activation induced by knockdown of EBP2 was significantly inhibited by Akt inhibitor GDC‐0068, mTORC1 inhibitor rapamycin, and knockdown of Raptor, an essential component of mTORC1. These results suggest that the knockdown of EBP2 triggered p53 activation through the Akt‐mTORC1 pathway in NPM‐ALK‐positive cells. Collectively, the present results revealed the critical repressive mechanism of p53 activity by EBP2 and provide a novel therapeutic strategy for the treatment of ALCL.

Abbreviations

ALCL

anaplastic large‐cell lymphoma

EBP2

EBNA1‐binding protein 2

IMT

inflammatory myofibroblastic tumors

mTOR

mechanistic target of rapamycin

mTORC1

mTOR complex 1

NoLS

nucleolar localization signal

NPM1

nucleophosmin 1

NPM‐ALK

nucleophosmin‐anaplastic lymphoma kinase

NSCLC

non‐small cell lung cancer

TPM3

tropomyosin 3

     

DNA in extracellular vesicles: biological and clinical aspects

The study of extracellular vesicles (EVs), especially in the liquid biopsy field, has rapidly evolved in recent years. However, most EV studies have focused on RNA or protein content and DNA in EVs (EV‐DNA) has largely been unnoticed. In this review, we compile current evidence regarding EV‐DNA and provide an extensive discussion on EV‐DNA biology. We look into EV‐DNA biogenesis and mechanisms of DNA loading into EVs, as well as describe the particularly significant function of DNA‐carrying EVs in the maintenance of cellular homeostasis, intracellular communication, and immune response modulation. We also examine the current role of EV‐DNA in the clinical setting, specifically in cancer, infections, pregnancy, and prenatal diagnosis.

Abbreviations

BBB

blood–brain barrier

cfDNA

cell‐free DNA

cGAS

cyclic GMP‐AMP synthase

ctDNA

circulating tumor DNA

ds

double‐stranded

EGFR

epidermal growth factor receptor

EV‐DNA

DNA in extracellular vesicles

EV‐mtDNA

mtDNA in extracellular vesicles

EVs

extracellular vesicles

gDNA

genomic DNA

HBV

hepatitis B virus

HPV

human papillomavirus

IFN1

interferon type 1

ILVs

intraluminal vesicles

MAFs

mean frequencies

MN

micronuclei

mtDNA

mitochondrial DNA

MVBs

multivesicular bodies

NGS

next‐generation sequencing

NSCLC

non‐small‐cell lung cancer

PCR

polymerase chain reaction

PDAC

pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

ss

single‐stranded

STING

stimulator of interferon genes

     

Long non‐coding RNA RACGAP1P promotes breast cancer invasion and metastasis via miR‐345‐5p/RACGAP1‐mediated mitochondrial fission

Long non‐coding RNAs (lncRNAs) are emerging as key molecules in various cancers, yet their potential roles in the pathogenesis of breast cancer are not fully understood. Herein, using microarray analysis, we revealed that the lncRNA RACGAP1P, the pseudogene of Rac GTPase activating protein 1 (RACGAP1), was up‐regulated in breast cancer tissues. Its high expression was confirmed in 25 pairs of breast cancer tissues and 8 breast cell lines by qRT‐PCR. Subsequently, we found that RACGAP1P expression was positively correlated with lymph node metastasis, distant metastasis, TNM stage, and shorter survival time in 102 breast cancer patients. Then, in vitro and in vivo experiments were designed to investigate the biological function and regulatory mechanism of RACGAP1P in breast cancer cell lines. Overexpression of RACGAP1P in MDA‐MB‐231 and MCF7 breast cell lines increased their invasive ability and enhanced their mitochondrial fission. Conversely, inhibition of mitochondrial fission by Mdivi‐1 could reduce the invasive ability of RACGAP1P‐overexpressing cell lines. Furthermore, the promotion of mitochondrial fission by RACGAP1P depended on its competitive binding with miR‐345‐5p against its parental gene RACGAP1, leading to the activation of dynamin‐related protein 1 (Drp1). In conclusion, lncRNA RACGAP1P promotes breast cancer invasion and metastasis via miR‐345‐5p/RACGAP1 pathway‐mediated mitochondrial fission.

Abbreviations

CDS

coding sequence

ceRNAs

competitive endogenous RNAs

Drp1

dynamin‐related protein 1

FFPE

formalin‐fixed paraffin‐embedded

lncRNAs

long non‐coding RNAs

miRNAs

microRNAs

RACGAP1

Rac GTPase activating protein 1

TCGA

The Cancer Genome Atlas

     

A cancer‐associated CDKN1B mutation induces p27 phosphorylation on a novel residue: a new mechanism for tumor suppressor loss‐of‐function

CDKN1B haploinsufficiency promotes the development of several human cancers. The gene encodes p27^Kip1, a protein playing pivotal roles in the control of growth, differentiation, cytoskeleton dynamics, and cytokinesis. CDKN1B haploinsufficiency has been associated with chromosomal or gene aberrations. However, very few data exist on the mechanisms by which CDKN1B missense mutations facilitate carcinogenesis. Here, we report a functional study on a cancer‐associated germinal p27^Kip1 variant, namely glycine9‐>arginine‐p27^Kip1 (G9R‐p27^Kip1) identified in a parathyroid adenoma. We unexpectedly found that G9R‐p27^Kip1 lacks the major tumor suppressor activities of p27^Kip1 including its antiproliferative and pro‐apoptotic functions. In addition, G9R‐p27^Kip1 transfection in cell lines induces the formation of more numerous and larger spheres when compared to wild‐type p27^Kip1‐transfected cells. We demonstrated that the mutation creates a consensus sequence for basophilic kinases causing a massive phosphorylation of G9R‐p27^Kip1 on S12, a residue normally never found modified in p27^Kip1. The novel S12 phosphorylation appears responsible for the loss of function of G9R‐p27^Kip1 since S12AG9R‐p27^Kip1 recovers most of the p27^Kip1 tumor suppressor activities. In addition, the expression of the phosphomimetic S12D‐p27^Kip1 recapitulates G9R‐p27^Kip1 properties. Mechanistically, S12 phosphorylation enhances the nuclear localization of the mutant protein and also reduces its cyclin‐dependent kinase (CDK)2/CDK1 inhibition activity. To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of quantitative phosphorylation of a p27^Kip1 variant on a physiologically unmodified residue associated with the loss of several tumor suppressor activities. In addition, our findings demonstrate that haploinsufficiency might be due to unpredictable post‐translational modifications due to generation of novel consensus sequences by cancer‐associated missense mutations.

Abbreviations

1D/WB

monodimensional western blotting

2D/WB

two‐dimensional western blotting

CDK

cyclin‐dependent kinase

CHX

cycloheximide

G9R‐p27

glycine9‐>arginine‐p27

IUPs

intrinsically unstructured proteins

mAbs

monoclonal antibodies

MEN

multiple endocrine neoplasia

MENX

multiple endocrine neoplasia X

PTMs

post‐translational modifications

rAbs

rabbit antibodies

TSG

tumor suppressor gene

wt‐p27

wild‐type p27

     

TGFβ promotes YAP‐dependent AXL induction in mesenchymal‐type lung cancer cells

The acquisition of chemoresistance remains a major cause of cancer mortality due to the limited accessibility of targeted or immune therapies. However, given that severe alterations of molecular features during epithelial‐to‐mesenchymal transition (EMT) lead to acquired chemoresistance, emerging studies have focused on identifying targetable drivers associated with acquired chemoresistance. Particularly, AXL, a key receptor tyrosine kinase that confers resistance against targets and chemotherapeutics, is highly expressed in mesenchymal cancer cells. However, the underlying mechanism of AXL induction in mesenchymal cancer cells is poorly understood. Our study revealed that the YAP signature, which was highly enriched in mesenchymal‐type lung cancer, was closely correlated to AXL expression in 181 lung cancer cell lines. Moreover, using isogenic lung cancer cell pairs, we also found that doxorubicin treatment induced YAP nuclear translocation in mesenchymal‐type lung cancer cells to induce AXL expression. Additionally, the concurrent activation of TGFβ signaling coordinated YAP‐dependent AXL expression through SMAD4. These data suggest that crosstalk between YAP and the TGFβ/SMAD axis upon treatment with chemotherapeutics might be a promising target to improve chemosensitivity in mesenchymal‐type lung cancer.

Abbreviations

AUC

area under the curve

AXL

AXL receptor tyrosine kinase

BCL2

B‐cell lymphoma 2

CTD2

cancer target discovery and development

CTGF

connective tissue growth factor

DEG

differentially expressed genes

DOXO

doxorubicin

EMT

epithelial–mesenchymal transition

Eto

etoposide

FDA

Food and Drug Administration

ITGB3

integrin beta‐3

MAPK

mitogen‐activated protein kinase

MMP2

matrix metalloproteinase‐2

MMP9

matrix metalloproteinase‐9

mRNA

messenger RNA

NF‐κB

nuclear factor kappa‐light‐chain‐enhancer of activated B cells

SBE

SMAD binding element

SERPINE1

serpin family E member 1

siRNA

small interfering RNA

ssGSEA

single‐sample gene set enrichment analysis

TCGA

The Cancer Genome Atlas

TGFβ

transforming growth factor beta

YAP

Yes‐associated protein

YAP8SA

mutants of inhibitory phosphorylation site at eight serine to Alanine of YAP

ZEB1

zinc finger E‐box binding homeobox 1

ZEB2

zinc finger E‐box‐binding homeobox 2

     

Downregulation of miR‐326 and its host gene β‐arrestin1 induces pro‐survival activity of E2F1 and promotes medulloblastoma growth

Persistent mortality rates of medulloblastoma (MB) and severe side effects of the current therapies require the definition of the molecular mechanisms that contribute to tumor progression. Using cultured MB cancer stem cells and xenograft tumors generated in mice, we show that low expression of miR‐326 and its host gene β‐arrestin1 (ARRB1) promotes tumor growth enhancing the E2F1 pro‐survival function. Our models revealed that miR‐326 and ARRB1 are controlled by a bivalent domain, since the H3K27me3 repressive mark is found at their regulatory region together with the activation‐associated H3K4me3 mark. High levels of EZH2, a feature of MB, are responsible for the presence of H3K27me3. Ectopic expression of miR‐326 and ARRB1 provides hints into how their low levels regulate E2F1 activity. MiR‐326 targets E2F1 mRNA, thereby reducing its protein levels; ARRB1, triggering E2F1 acetylation, reverses its function into pro‐apoptotic activity. Similar to miR‐326 and ARRB1 overexpression, we also show that EZH2 inhibition restores miR‐326/ARRB1 expression, limiting E2F1 pro‐proliferative activity. Our results reveal a new regulatory molecular axis critical for MB progression.

Abbreviations

ARRB1

β‐arrestin1

BTC

bulk tumor cell

CSCs

cancer stem cells

EZH2

enhancer of zeste homolog 2

GCP

granule cell progenitors

MB

medulloblastoma

OFC

oncosphere‐forming cell