Randomized phase III trial of S-1 versus capecitabine in the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: SALTO study by the Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group

BackgroundHand–foot syndrome (HFS) is a common side-effect of capecitabine. S-1 is an oral fluoropyrimidine with comparable efficacy to capecitabine in gastrointestinal cancers but associated with a lower incidence of HFS in Asian patients. This study compares the incidence of HFS between S-1 and capecitabine as first-line treatment in Western metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients.Patients and methodsPatients with previously untreated mCRC and planned treatment with fluoropyrimidine monochemotherapy were randomized 1 : 1 to receive either capecitabine (1250 mg/m² orally for patients <70 years; 1000 mg/m² for patients ≥70 years, twice daily on days 1–14) or S-1 (30 mg/m² orally twice daily on days 1–14) in 3-weekly cycles, with bevacizumab optional in both groups. The primary endpoint was the incidence of any grade HFS, as assessed by both physicians and patients (diaries). Secondary endpoints included grade 3 HFS, other toxicities, relative dose intensity, progression-free survival, response rate and overall survival.ResultsA total of 161 patients were randomized in 27 centres. The incidence of any grade HFS as assessed by physicians was 73% in the capecitabine group (n = 80) and 45% in the S-1 group (n = 80) [odds ratio (95% confidence interval) 0.31 (0.16–0.60),P = 0.0005]. The incidence of grade 3 HFS was 21% and 4% (P = 0.003), respectively. Patient-assessed any grade HFS was 84% and 58%, respectively (P = 0.004). Grade 3 anorexia was more common in the S-1 group (3% versus 13%,P = 0.03). Median relative dose intensity was 88% in the capecitabine group and 95% in the S-1 group (P = 0.026). There were no statistically significant differences in median progression-free survival, response rate and overall survival rates.ConclusionTreatment with S-1 in Western mCRC patients is associated with a significantly lower incidence of HFS compared with capecitabine, with comparable efficacy.ClinicalTrials.gov registration numberNCT01918852.     

Phase I trial of capecitabine rapidly disintegrating tablets and concomitant radiation therapy in children with newly diagnosed brainstem gliomas and high-grade gliomas

Background

We conducted a phase I study to estimate the maximum tolerated dose and describe the dose-limiting toxicities and pharmacokinetics of oral capecitabine rapidly disintegrating tablets given concurrently with radiation therapy to children with newly diagnosed brainstem or high-grade gliomas.

Methods

Children 3–21 y with newly diagnosed intrinsic brainstem or high-grade gliomas were eligible for enrollment. The starting dose was 500 mg/m², given twice daily, with subsequent cohorts enrolled at 650 mg/m² and 850 mg/m² using a 3 + 3 phase I design. Children received capecitabine at the assigned dose daily for 9 wks starting from the first day of radiation therapy (RT). Following a 2-wk break, patients received 3 courses of capecitabine 1250 mg/m² twice daily for 14 days followed by a 7-day rest. Pharmacokinetic sampling was performed in consenting patients. Six additional patients with intrinsic brainstem gliomas were enrolled at the maximum tolerated dose to further characterize the pharmacokinetic and toxicity profiles.

Results

Twenty-four patients were enrolled. Twenty were fully assessable for toxicity. Dose-limiting toxicities were palmar plantar erythroderma (grades 2 and 3) and elevation of alanine aminotransferase (grades 2 and 3). Systemic exposure to capecitabine and metabolites was similar to or slightly lower than predicted based on adult data.

Conclusions

Capecitabine with concurrent RT was generally well tolerated. The recommended phase II capecitabine dose when given with concurrent RT is 650 mg/m², administered twice daily. A phase II study to evaluate the efficacy of this regimen in children with intrinsic brainstem gliomas is in progress (PBTC-030).     

Phase I study of weekly (day 1 and 8) docetaxel in combination with capecitabine in patients with advanced solid malignancies

Purpose Capecitabine in combination with docetaxel given every 3 weeks has shown a high degree of activity in a number of tumor types, but at the expense of significant toxicity. To improve the therapeutic index, we evaluated a weekly regimen of docetaxel in combination with capecitabine, and determined the maximum tolerated dose, toxicities and pharmacokinetics of this combination.Patients and methods Patients with advanced solid malignancies were treated with docetaxel on days 1 and 8, and capecitabine, twice daily on days 1–14, of an every-21-day cycle. Pharmacokinetics of docetaxel were assessed on days 1 and 8 of the first cycle of chemotherapy.Results Enrolled in the study were 25 patients. The most frequent toxicities were asthenia, hand-foot syndrome and mucositis. Inability to deliver at least 75% of the planned doses of both drugs during the first two cycles of chemotherapy was noted at dose levels 2, 3 and 4. Dose level 1 (docetaxel 30 mg/m² and capecitabine 825 mg/m² twice daily) is the recommended dose for phase II studies. Five patients experienced a partial response, and eight patients had stabilization of disease. Coadministration of capecitabine did not alter the pharmacokinetics of docetaxel.Conclusion The regimen consisting of docetaxel 30 mg/m² (days 1, 8) and capecitabine 825 mg/m² twice daily (days 1–14) was well tolerated. Capecitabine did not alter pharmacokinetics of docetaxel. Further testing of this regimen in tumor-specific trials, especially gastric, lung and breast cancer, is warranted.Presented at the 39th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, May 2003, Chicago, IL.     

A Phase I Clinical Trial of Trametinib in Combination with TAS-102 in Patients with Chemotherapy-Resistant RAS-Mutated (PIK3CA/PTEN-Wild Type) Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

PurposeWe conducted a phase I study to evaluate the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), safety, and efficacy of trametinib in combination with TAS-102 in patients with chemotherapy-refractory KRAS-mutant, wild-type PIK3CA/PTEN metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).MethodsA 3+3 dose de-escalation single arm phase I clinical trial was performed in patients with chemorefractory mCRC without priorTAS-102 exposure. Patients received fixed dosing of trametinib 2mg oral daily along with de-escalating doses of TAS-102 beginning at 35 mg/m² twice daily on days 1-5 and days 8-12 every 28 days. Primary endpoint was evaluation of MTD.Results25 eligible patients were enrolled in this study. During the dose de-escalation phase, no dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) were observed at the full doses of trametinib/TAS-102 and the MTD was determined to be TAS-102 35 mg/m² orally twice daily on days 1 to5 and days 8 to12 every 28 days with continuous trametinib dosing at 2mg orally daily. No patients achieved a partial or complete response. 5 of 21 evaluable patients (23.81%) achieved a stable disease response. Median PFS was two months (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.70-4.82) while median OS was 7 months (95% CI 6.36-11.48). Treatments were well tolerated with most common grade ≥ 3 adverse events being anemia (20%), neutropenia (12%), leukopenia (8%), diarrhea (8%), rash (4%), and fatigue (4%).ConclusionsTrametinib in combination with TAS-102 demonstrated a manageable safety profile. However, this combination did not achieve meaningful clinical benefit in patients with RAS-mutated PIK3CA and PTEN wild-type refractory mCRC. Clinical trial information: NCT03317119.     

Phase I/II study of gefitinib and capecitabine in patients with colorectal cancer

Objective The objectives of this phase I/II study were to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), characterise the principal toxicities in the phase I part and assess the efficacy in the phase II part of gefitinib, an oral selective inhibitor of the epidermal growth factor receptor, in combination with capecitabine in patients with advanced colorectal cancer (CRC). Methods and patients Patients with advanced CRC were treated with gefitinib administered daily for 21 days and capecitabine administered twice daily for 14 days of a 21-day cycle. The dose levels of gefitinib (mg) and capecitabine (mg/m² bid) assessed were 250/1000 and 250/ 1250. An expanded cohort was enrolled at the MTD to better characterise toxicity and efficacy. A total of 32 previously treated patients were accrued. In the phase I part 10 subjects were treated, with one dose-limiting toxicity. Overall 26 patients were treated at the MTD of the combination, which was gefitinib 250 mg/day and capecitabine 1250 mg/m² twice daily. Results The most frequent treatment-related adverse events included asthenia, diarrhoea, nausea, rash and anorexia. The incidence profile was very similar in phases I and II. No objective responses were documented but 53% of the patients achieved stable disease as best response to therapy. Conclusions Capecitabine 1250 mg/m² twice daily 14 of 21 days and gefitinib at 250 mg/day can be safely administered in combination. The combination is relatively well tolerated. There were no objective responses, although an interesting stabilisation rate was documented, in previously treated advanced CRC patients.     

Phase I pharmacokinetic study of chronomodulated dose-intensified combination of capecitabine and oxaliplatin (XELOX) in metastatic colorectal cancer

Purpose

To evaluate the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and pharmacokinetic profile of a chronomodulated, dose-intensified regimen of capecitabine in combination with oxaliplatin (XELOX) in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).

Methods

Patients (N?=?18) with 0 or 1 line of prior chemotherapy received oxaliplatin 100?mg/m² on day 1 from 1400 to 1800 hours with escalating dose levels of capecitabine (2,500, 3,000, 3,500, 4,000, 4,500, and 5,000?mg) once daily taken at 2400 hours on days 1?C5. Each cycle lasted 14?days.

Results

The MTD of capecitabine was 4,500?mg. Transaminitis and anemia were the commonest non-hematologic and hematologic toxicities, respectively. Toxicities were generally mild, with only five occurrences of grade 3 toxicity and none of grade 4. There were no dose-limiting toxicities, defined as specific grade 3 or 4 toxicities occurring in the first two cycles of treatment. The objective response rate was 33.3?%, and median overall survival was 16.3?months (95?% CI: 11.2?C18.2?months). The maximum plasma concentration (C _max) and area under plasma concentration?Ctime curve from time 0 to infinity (AUC_[0?C??]) of the capecitabine metabolites in our fixed-dosing chronomodulated regimen were comparable to values seen with comparably dose-intense regimens but associated with significantly reduced toxicity.

Conclusions

Chronomodulated dose-intensified XELOX facilitates delivery of dose-intense treatment in mCRC with a favorable therapeutic index that is promising.     

A Phase I Trial of the PI3K Inhibitor Buparlisib Combined With Capecitabine in Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer

Background

Buparlisib is an oral pan-class I phosphotidyinositol-3-kinase (PI3K) inhibitor. The present phase I study evaluated the safety, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of buparlisib with capecitabine in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

Phase I trial of GTI-2040, oxaliplatin, and capecitabine in the treatment of advanced metastatic solid tumors: a California Cancer Consortium Study

Background  GTI-2040 is a 20-mer antisense oligonucleotide targeting the mRNA of ribonucleotide reductase M2. It was combined with oxaliplatin and capecitabine in a phase I trial in patients with advance solid tumors based on previous studies demonstrating potentiation of chemotherapy with ribonucleotide reductase inhibitors. Methods  Patients at least 18 years of age with advanced incurable solid tumors and normal organ function as well as a Karnofsky performance status of ≥60% were eligible. One prior chemotherapy regimen for advanced disease or relapse within 12 months of adjuvant chemotherapy was required. Patients could have received prior fluoropyrimidines, including capecitabine, but not oxaliplatin. Treatment cycles were 21 days. In each cycle, GTI-2040 was given as a continuous intravenous infusion over 14 days, oxaliplatin as a 2-h intravenous infusion on day 1, and capecitabine orally twice a day for 14 days. In cycle 1 only, oxaliplatin and capecitabine were started on day 2 to allow ribonucleotide reductase mRNA levels to be measured with and without oxaliplatin and capecitabine. Doses were escalated in cohorts of three patients using a standard 3 + 3 design until the maximum tolerated dose was established, defined as no more than one first-cycle dose-limiting toxicity among six patients treated at a given dose level. Results  The maximum tolerated dose was estimated to be the combination of GTI-2040 3 mg/kg per day for 14 days, capecitabine 600 mg/m² twice daily for 14 days, and oxaliplatin 100 mg/m² every 21 days. Dose-limiting toxicities were hematologic. GTI-2040 pharmacokinetics, obtained at steady-state on days 7 and 14, showed the high inter-patient variability previously reported. Two of six patients had stable disease at the maximum tolerated dose and one patient, with heavily pre-treated non-small cell lung cancer, had a partial response at a higher dose level. In samples from a limited number of patients, there was no clear decrease in ribonucleotide reductase expression in peripheral blood mononuclear cells during treatment. Conclusion  A combination of GTI-2040, capecitabine and oxaliplatin is feasible in patients with advanced solid tumors. This study was supported by U01 CA062505 and P30 CA033572 from the NCI.     

First-line panitumumab plus capecitabine for the treatment of older patients with wild-type RAS metastatic colorectal cancer. The phase II,PANEL study

BackgroundDespite the high morbidity and mortality of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in older patients, they have been underrepresented in clinical trials and their optimal treatment is yet to be determined. This open-label phase II study evaluated the benefits of panitumumab and capecitabine as a first-line chemotherapy regimen in older patients with wild-type [WT] RAS mCRC.Patients and MethodsPatients (≥70 years; ECOG≤2) received 3-week cycles of panitumumab (9 mg/kg on day 1) plus capecitabine (850 mg/m² twice daily on days 1–14) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Response was evaluated every 9 weeks according to RECIST_1.1. Outcome measures were: objective response rate (ORR), duration of response (DoR), time to response (TTR), progression (TTP) and treatment failure (TTF), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety.ResultsTwenty-seven patients (11 women; median age: 78 years; ECOG: 0 [26%], 1 [67%], 2 [7%]) were evaluated. Median follow-up was 17.7 months. Confirmed ORR (95%CI) was 44.4% (25.7–63.2), with 25.9% of patients achieving at least stable disease. Median (95%CI) DoR was 8.7 (5.5–10.4) months, and median TTR was 2.2 (1.9–2.8) months. Median TTP was 9.6 (4.8–11.5) months, with a median TTF of 5.2 (2.8–7.2) months. The median PFS was 7.5 (4.4–10.4) months, and the median OS was 23.7 (7.4–27.5) months. Seventeen (63%) patients reported panitumumab and/or capecitabine-related adverse events grade 3–4, with skin toxicity (18.5%) being the most common. Two (7.4%) deaths were treatment-related.ConclusionThis study suggests that panitumumab plus capecitabine is a safe and effective regimen in older patients with WT RAS mCRC.     

A phase 1 and pharmacokinetic study of enzastaurin in pediatric patients with refractory primary central nervous system tumors: a pediatric brain tumor consortium study

BackgroundWe sought to estimate the maximum tolerated or recommended phase 2 dose and describe the pharmacokinetics and toxicities of enzastaurin, an oral inhibitor of protein kinase Cβ, in children with recurrent central nervous system malignancies.MethodsEnzastaurin was administered continuously once daily at 3 dose levels (260, 340, and 440 mg/m²) and twice daily at 440 mg/m²/day. Plasma pharmacokinetics were evaluated following a single dose and at steady state. Inhibition of protein kinase C and Akt cell signaling in peripheral blood mononuclear cells was evaluated. Akt pathway activity was measured in pretreatment tumor samples.ResultsThirty-three patients enrolled; 1 was ineligible, and 3 were nonevaluable secondary to early progressive disease. There were no dose-limiting toxicities during the dose-finding phase. Two participants receiving 440 mg/m² given twice daily experienced dose-limiting toxicities of grade 3 thrombocytopenia resulting in delayed start of course 2 and grade 3 alanine transaminase elevation that did not recover within 5 days. There were no grade 4 toxicities during treatment. The concentration of enzastaurin increased with increasing dose and with continuous dosing; however, there was not a significant difference at the 440 mg/m² dosing level when enzastaurin was administered once daily versus twice daily. There were no objective responses; however, 11 participants had stable disease >3 cycles, 7 with glioma, 2 with ependymoma, and 2 with brainstem glioma.ConclusionEnzastaurin was well tolerated in children with recurrent CNS malignancies, with chromaturia, fatigue, anemia, thrombocytopenia, and nausea being the most common toxicities. The recommended phase 2 dose is 440 mg/m²/day administered once daily.     

A phase I dose escalation study of continuous oral capecitabine in combination with oxaliplatin and pelvic radiation (XELOX-RT) in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of continuous oral capecitabine plus oxaliplatin and pre-operative pelvic radiotherapy (XELOX-RT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with clinically unresectable rectal cancer or for whom resection with histologically clear (R0) surgical margins was unlikely received continuous capecitabine (500-825 mg/m2 twice daily, 7 days/week), oxaliplatin 2-h intravenous infusion (130 mg/m2 days 1 and 29) and pelvic radiotherapy (Monday-Friday for 5 weeks, total dose 45 Gy in 25 daily 1.8 Gy fractions). The MTD was the capecitabine dose causing dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs; treatment-related grade 3/4 toxicities) in one-third or more of patients treated per dose level. RESULTS: Eighteen patients received three dose levels. The MTD was capecitabine 825 mg/m2 twice daily: DLTs occurred in two of six patients (grade 3 diarrhoea, rectal pain with local skin reaction). No DLTs occurred in six patients receiving capecitabine 650 mg/m2 twice daily. Grade 3/4 toxicity was rare, with minimal myelosuppression. Although predominantly a dose-finding study, XELOX-RT showed promising activity. Fourteen patients had histologically confirmed R0 resections and five had a pathological complete response. CONCLUSIONS: The recommended dose for further study is capecitabine 650 mg/m2 twice daily with oxaliplatin and radiotherapy. XELOX-RT showed promising antitumour activity. Further evaluation is underway.     

Phase I-II study of bendamustine in patients with acute leukemia and high risk myelodysplastic syndrome

BackgroundAlkylating agents have shown activity in leukemia. Bendamustine, an active alkylating agent in lymphoma and chronic lymphocytic leukemia, was given in a fractionated twice daily schedule for 4 days to patients with acute leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) to define the dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) and maximum tolerated dose (MTD).Patients and MethodsAdults with refractory acute leukemia or high-risk MDS were treated with bendamustine at a starting dose of 50 mg/m² IV over 1-2 hours twice daily for 4 days. Dose escalations were by 25 mg/m² in the 1st 3 levels. The study used the 3 + 3 design.ResultsA total of 25 patients were treated. Their median age was 57 years; the median salvage number was 3. Grade 2 creatinine elevations were observed in 1 of 6 patients at the 50 mg/m² dose, in 2 of 13 patients at the 75 mg/m² dose, and in 3 of 6 patients at the 100 mg/m² dose. This was considered significant, even though DLT was not reached. One patient achieved marrow complete remission. Significant reductions of marrow blasts (50% or more) were observed in 6 of 25 patients (24%).ConclusionBendamustine fractionated dose level of 100 mg/m² IV twice daily for 4 days (800 mg/m² per course) was associated with Grade 2 renal toxicity. The proposed phase II schedule is 75 mg/m² IV twice daily for 4 days. Future studies should evaluate this schedule in less heavily treated patients.     

A phase Ib dose-escalation study of erlotinib, capecitabine and oxaliplatin in metastatic colorectal cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: Dysregulation of the epidermal growth factor receptor (HER1/EGFR) has been reported in colorectal cancer (CRC). Erlotinib is a potent inhibitor of HER1/EGFR-mediated signaling. This trial of patients with metastatic CRC (MCRC) examined the safety, maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and pharmacokinetics (PK) of erlotinib in combination with capecitabine and oxaliplatin (XELOX), a regimen with established efficacy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients previously untreated or treated with one line of 5-fluorouracil and/or irinotecan received escalating oral doses of erlotinib (daily), capecitabine (days 1-14) and i.v. oxaliplatin (day 1 of a 21-day cycle). RESULTS: The first six patients in cohort 1 (erlotinib 100 mg/day, capecitabine 825 mg/m(2) twice daily, oxaliplatin 130 mg/m(2)) had no dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs). In cohort 2 (capecitabine increased to 1000 mg/m(2) twice daily), two of six patients had DLTs. When cohort 2 was expanded to 11 patients two further DLTs occurred, exceeding the definition of MTD. Cohort 1 was expanded to 12 patients, and no DLTs occurred. The most common adverse events (AEs) were diarrhea and rash. There was a trend for reduced capecitabine concentrations in the presence of erlotinib. While this was not statistically significant, the possibility of an interaction affecting capecitabine PK cannot be excluded. Antitumor activity was observed in both cohorts (one complete and four partial responses, and stable disease in 11 patients). CONCLUSION: The MTD for this combination in MCRC is capecitabine 825 mg/m(2) twice daily days 1-14, oxaliplatin 130 mg/m(2) day 1 and erlotinib 100 mg/day of a 21-day cycle. The combination was well tolerated at the MTD, with no unexpected AEs. The use of this combination in MCRC warrants further investigation.     

Phase I dose-finding study of eribulin and capecitabine for metastatic breast cancer: JBCRG-18 cape study

Background

Eribulin is a nontaxane microtubule inhibitor with activity in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). We conducted a phase I dose-finding study of eribulin and capecitabine in patients with MBC pretreated with anthracycline and taxane.

Methods

Women with MBC aged ≤70 years were enrolled. A 3 + 3 dose escalation design was used: level 0 dosing, eribulin (1.4 mg/m² intravenously on days 1 and 8) plus capecitabine [825 mg/m² orally twice daily (BID)]; 2-weeks-on, 1-week-off in a 21-day cycle. If there were no dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), level 1 capecitabine dose was 1000 mg/m² BID. The primary objective was to determine maximum tolerated dose, DLTs, and recommended dose (RD). Secondary objectives included pharmacokinetics, safety, and best overall response rate.

Results

Nine women with MBC were enrolled; six at level 0, three at level 1. One patient had grade 4 DLTs at level 0 (serum creatinine 7.65 mg/dL and uric acid 13.4 mg/dL), considered associated with study drugs. Level 1 dosing was taken as the RD. Neutropenia was the most common ≥grade 3 toxicity. Pharmacokinetic parameters of eribulin were not influenced by co-administration of capecitabine. Of three patients in level 1, one achieved partial response and one had prolonged stable disease.

Conclusion

Eribulin with capecitabine in the level 1 dosing schedule was associated with manageable toxicities and promising clinical activity. This combination is recommended for phase II investigation.

     

A retrospective study evaluating a fixed low dose capecitabine monotherapy in women with HER-2 negative metastatic breast cancer

To determine if a low fixed dosing strategy of capecitabine would produce comparable clinical activity with less adverse toxicities compared to published data with higher doses in the setting of metastatic breast cancer (mBC). We retrospectively analyzed patients treated with a low fixed dose of capecitabine (CAPE-L) at 1,000 mg twice daily for 14 days every 21 days. Outcomes included clinical benefit rate (CBR), overall response rates (ORR), time to progression (TTP), and overall survival (OS). A historical comparison group of mBC patients treated on 12 prior trials at the package-insert dose of capecitabine (n = 1,949) was utilized. Eighty-six patients were analyzed in our cohort. Positive hormone receptor status (79.1 vs. 50.6 %), and capecitabine as first-line chemotherapy (44.2 vs. 16.5 %) were more frequent in our cohort relative to the historical comparison. The median starting dose in our cohort was 633.5 mg/m². The CBR was similar between the CAPE-L and the standard dose cohorts (55.8 vs. 49.5 %), as was ORR (24.3 vs. 24 %), and median TTP (7 mo, 95 % CI 5.5–8.5 vs. 5.1 mo, 95 % CI 4.5–5.7). Median OS was longer in our cohort (24 mo, 95 % CI 16.8–31.2) than the historic standard dose cohort (12.1 mo, 95 % CI 9.6–14.4), a difference that was likely explained by the higher proportion of patients in the CAPE-L cohort who received capecitabine as first-line chemotherapy and who had hormone receptor positive disease. As expected, adverse events were less frequent with CAPE-L. We found that CAPE-L, which translates into a dose of 600–650 mg/m², appeared to have good clinical efficacy and acceptable toxicity.     

Phase I study of biweekly oxaliplatin,gemcitabine and capecitabine in patients with advanced upper gastrointestinal malignancies

BackgroundOxaliplatin, gemcitabine and capecitabine are all active agents against upper gastrointestinal and pancreaticobiliary cancers.Patients and methodsPatients with upper gastrointestinal malignancies treated with 0–2 prior chemotherapy regimens received oxaliplatin (85–100 mg/m²) as a 2-h i.v. infusion with gemcitabine (800–1000 mg/m²) at a constant rate i.v. infusion (CI) of 10 mg/m²/min on days 1 and 15 of a 28-day cycle. Capecitabine (600–800 mg/m²) was administered orally twice a day on days 1–7 and 15–21. A three per cohort dose escalation schema was used to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and the dose-limiting toxic effects (DLTs) of this combination regimen.ResultsThirty patients with advanced upper gastrointestinal malignancies were enrolled. The MTD was defined as oxaliplatin 100 mg/m² i.v. over 2 h plus gemcitabine 800 mg/m² i.v. at a CI of 10 mg/m²/min on days 1 and 15 with capecitabine 800 mg/m² p.o. b.i.d. days 1–7 and 15–21 of a 29-day cycle. DLTs include grade 3 fatigue and grade 3 dyspnea. One complete and two partial responses were observed.ConclusionsThis biweekly schedule of oxaliplatin, gemcitabine and capecitabine is tolerable and warrants further investigation in biliary and pancreatic malignancies.     

Phase II study of S-1 plus leucovorin in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer

BackgroundS-1, a novel oral fluoropyrimidine, is well tolerated in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The response rate of S-1 for colorectal cancer is high, ranging from 35% to 40%. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of S-1 combined with oral leucovorin (LV) to enhance antitumor activity in chemotherapy-naive patients with mCRC.Patients and methodsS-1 was given orally twice daily for two consecutive weeks at a daily dose of 80–120 mg, followed by a 2-week rest period, within a 4-week cycle. LV was given orally twice a day at a daily dose of 50 mg, simultaneously with S-1.ResultsOf the 56 patients with previously untreated mCRC, 32 (57%) had partial responses. The median follow-up period was 27.2 months. The median time to progression was 6.7 months (95% confidence interval 5.4–7.9). The median survival time was 24.3 months. There was no treatment-related death or grade 4 toxicity. The most common grade 3 toxic effects were diarrhea (32%), anorexia (21%), stomatitis (20%), and neutropenia (14%).ConclusionS-1 combined with LV therapy demonstrated promising efficacy and acceptable safety in chemotherapy-naive patients with mCRC without the concurrent use of irinotecan, oxaliplatin, or molecular-targeted drugs.     

A phase I study of EKB-569 in combination with capecitabine in patients with advanced colorectal cancer

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), characterize the principal toxicities, and assess the pharmacokinetics of EKB-569, an oral selective irreversible inhibitor of the epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase, in combination with capecitabine in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Patients were treated with EKB-569 daily for 21 days and capecitabine twice daily for 14 days of a 21-day cycle. The dose levels of EKB-569 (mg/day) and capecitabine (mg/m(2) twice daily) assessed were 25/750, 50/750, 50/1,000 and 75/1,000. An expanded cohort was enrolled at the MTD to better study toxicity and efficacy. Samples of plasma were collected to characterize the pharmacokinetics of the agents. Treatment efficacy was assessed every other cycle. RESULTS: A total of 37 patients, the majority of whom had prior chemotherapy, received a total of 163 cycles of treatment. Twenty patients were treated at the MTD, 50 mg EKB-569, daily and 1,000 mg/m(2) capecitabine twice daily. Dose-limiting toxicities were diarrhea and rash. No patients had complete or partial responses but 48% had stable disease. The conversion of capecitabine to 5-fluorouracil was higher for the combination of EKB-569 and capecitabine (321+/-151 ng*h/mL) than for capecitabine alone (176+/-62 ng*hours/mL; P=0.0037). CONCLUSION: In advanced colorectal cancer, 50 mg EKB-569 daily can be safely combined with 1,000 mg/m(2) capecitabine twice a day. A statistically significant increase in plasma levels of 5-fluorouracil for the combination of EKB-569 and capecitabine may be due to the single-dose versus multiple-dose exposure difference, variability in exposure or a potential drug interaction.     

Phase I Results from a Study of Crizotinib in Combination with Erlotinib in Patients with Advanced Nonsquamous Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer

IntroductionThis phase I trial was conducted to determine the safety, maximum tolerated dose (MTD)/recommended phase II dose, and efficacy of crizotinib plus erlotinib in patients with advanced NSCLC.MethodsPatients with NSCLC and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 to 2 after failure of one or two prior chemotherapy regimens were eligible. Erlotinib, 100 mg, was given continuously once daily starting between day −14 and −7; crizotinib, 200 mg twice daily (dose level 1) or 150 mg twice daily (dose level −1), was added continuously beginning on day 1 of treatment cycle 1. Potential pharmacokinetic interactions between crizotinib and erlotinib were evaluated.ResultsTwenty-seven patients received treatment; 26 received crizotinib plus erlotinib. Frequent adverse events were diarrhea, rash, decreased appetite, and fatigue. Dose-limiting toxicities were dehydration, diarrhea, dry eye, dysphagia, dyspepsia, esophagitis and vomiting. The MTD was crizotinib, 150 mg twice daily, with erlotinib, 100 mg once daily. Crizotinib increased the erlotinib area under the concentration-time curve 1.5-fold (dose level −1) and 1.8-fold (dose level 1). The plasma level of crizotinib appeared to be unaffected by coadministration of erlotinib. Two patients whose tumors harbored activating EGFR mutations achieved confirmed partial responses, one at each crizotinib dose level.ConclusionsThe MTD of the combination of crizotinib and erlotinib in patients with advanced NSCLC was crizotinib, 150 mg twice daily, with erlotinib, 100 mg once daily, which is less than the approved dose of either agent. The phase II portion of the study was not initiated.     

First-line therapy with moderate dose capecitabine in metastatic breast cancer is safe and active: Results of the MONICA trial

BackgroundTo determine activity and safety of capecitabine at a moderate dose of 2000 mg/m² as first-line therapy for metastatic breast cancer.MethodsIn this prospective phase II trial, patients with HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer received first-line capecitabine 2000 mg/m² on days 1–14 every 3 weeks. The primary aim was to exclude a time to progression (TTP) <6 months. Secondary end-points were overall response rate, overall survival (OS), toxicity and quality of life.ResultsMedian age of the 161 included patients was 65 years. Median TTP and OS were 7.3 months [95% (confidence interval) CI: 6.2–8.4] and 17.1 months (95% CI: 14.0–20.3), respectively. An overall response rate of 26.1%, including 13 complete remissions was observed. Patients developing grade I–III hand-foot syndrome had a significantly longer TTP and OS and patients >65 years also achieved a significantly longer TTP. Haematological grade I–IV toxicities were leucopenia (64.0%), anaemia (50.9%) and thrombocytopenia (28.0%). Relevant non-haematological toxicities were hand-food-syndrome (37.3%), fatigue (34.2%), nausea (29.8%) and diarrhoea (20.5%). Quality of life assessment revealed an improved emotional function, but worsening of nausea and vomiting from cycle 1–10.ConclusionsCapecitabine at a dose of 2000 mg/m² is active and safe as first-line treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer.