首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
相似文献
 共查询到18条相似文献,搜索用时 140 毫秒
1.
国产奈达铂治疗食管癌的Ⅱ期临床试验报告   总被引:12,自引:0,他引:12  
Xu RH  Shi YX  Guan ZZ  Jiang WQ  Huang H  Ma ZY  Wang JH  Hu XH  Xie WM  Li XG  Liu YL  Pan LX  Dai AD  Zhuang W  Zhang C 《癌症》2006,25(12):1565-1568
背景与目的:奈达铂是第二代有机铂类抗癌药,国外的临床研究显示该药是一个广谱、高效的抗癌药物,治疗食管癌有效率较高,但是国产奈达铂的临床疗效及其不良反应尚不清楚。本研究目的是观察Ⅱ类新药国产奈达铂对晚期食管癌的疗效及其不良反应。方法:本研究为多中心、前瞻性、随机对照Ⅱ期临床研究。对52例未接受过化疗的初治食管癌患者进行随机分组,试验组30例,接受奈达铂联合5-Fu治疗。对照组22例,接受DDP联合5-FU治疗。结果:30例试验组患者中,27例可评价疗效,30例可评价不良反应。22例对照组患者均可评价疗效和不良反应。在疗效方面,试验组的总有效率高于对照组,分别为29.63%与22.73%(P〈0.05)。其中试验组的CR率为18.51%,而对照组为4.55%。在骨髓抑制方面,Hh下降的发生率两组基本一致:试验组WBC下降和血小板抑制的发生率明显高于对照组,特别是Ⅲ、Ⅳ度血小板下降(20.68%VS.0%,P〈0.01)。试验组消化道反应的总发生率低于对照组.其中呕吐的发生率和严重程度两组之间存在显著性差异(P〈0.05)。两组其他不良反应发生率相比无显著性差异。结论:奈达铂对晚期食管癌有一定的疗效,与5-Fu联合的有效率较DDP+5-FU联合方案有一定优势,临床耐受性较好.主要不良反应为骨髓抑制,特别是严重的血小板下降。  相似文献   

2.
目的:对比分析吉西他滨联合奈达铂化疗方案和联合顺铂化疗方案分别治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的疗效及毒性反应。方法:56例晚期患者随机分为奈达铂(NDP)组29例和顺铂(DDP)组27例,两组病人的临床基本特征无显著差异,每例均保证至少进行两个周期的化疗。化疗两个周期后2-3周评价临床疗效。结果:NDP组的治疗有效率为44.8%,与DDP组(40.7%)比较差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。主要的毒副反应为骨髓抑制和消化道反应,两组骨髓抑制发生率差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05),但NDP组消化道反应明显轻于DDP组(P〈0.05)。绝大多数患者耐受性良好。结论:吉西他滨联合奈达铂方案治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌与联合顺铂方案临床疗效相当,但不良反应较轻,值得进一步推广应用。  相似文献   

3.
目的评价奈达铂(NDP)或顺铂(DDP)联合多西他赛(TXT)治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的疗效和不良反应。方法 96例初治的晚期非小细胞肺癌随机分为2组,试验组患者采用奈达铂加多西他赛(TN组),TXT 75mg/m2、d1;NDP 80mg/m2,分3d静脉注射,21d为1个周期。对照组患者采用顺铂加多西他赛(TP组),TXT 75mg/m2,DDP 80mg/m2,分3d静滴,21d为1个周期。结果 TN组中,CR 1例,PR 21例,有效率(CR+PR)为45.8%。TP组中,CR 2例,PR 19例,有效率为43.8%,两组间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。试验组白细胞与血小板减少与对照组比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。试验组消化道反应明显小于对照组(P<0.05)。结论奈达铂联合化疗治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的疗效与顺铂相似,消化道反应小于顺铂组。奈达铂联合多西他赛化疗治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌有效,不良反应轻。  相似文献   

4.
奈达铂治疗恶性肿瘤的临床研究   总被引:18,自引:3,他引:15  
目的 观察奈达铂(NDP)单药治疗头颈部鳞癌、非小细胞肺癌、食管癌、卵巢上皮癌的临床疗效及安全性;比较NDP与顺铂(DDP)联合化疗治疗上述肿瘤的疗效和安全性。方法 NDP单药组:NDP100mg,/m^2,第1天,每3周为1个周期,至少2个周期。联合化疗组:NDP80mg,/m^2,第1天,或DDP30mg,/m^2,第1~3天,分别联合5-氟尿嘧啶(5-Fu)、长春瑞滨(NVB)、长春花碱酰胺(VDS)+5-Fu、紫杉醇(PTX)或环磷酰胺(CTX),每3周为1个周期,至少2个周期。结果 NDP单药组37例,NDP联合化疗组139例,DDP联合化疗对照组61例。NDP单药对晚期非小细胞肺癌的有效率为10.5%(2/19)。1例卵巢癌和1例头颈部鳞癌取得PR。对既往铂类药物治疗失败的非小细胞肺癌和卵巢癌患者,NDP单药仍有一定疗效。NDP联合化疗对非小细胞肺癌、卵巢癌、头颈鳞癌和食管癌的有效率分别为33.9%(21/62)、44.8%(13/29)、20.0%(3/15)和18.2%(4/22),与DDP联合化疗对照组的结果相似。对初治的非小细胞肺癌患者,NDP联合化疗组的有效率(35.7%)优于DDP联合化疗对照组(17.1%,P=0.045)。单药NDP的不良反应主要为骨髓抑制(白细胞和血小板减少、贫血)、恶心和呕吐。NDP联合化疗组患者骨髓抑制、肾功能损害与DDP联合化疗对照组相似,呕吐反应明显轻于DDP联合化疗对照组,但肝功能损害比DDP联合化疗对照组明显。结论 NDP单药对头颈鳞癌、非小细胞肺癌和卵巢癌有一定疗效。NDP联合化疗对头颈鳞癌、非小细胞肺癌、卵巢癌和食管癌疗效肯定,胃肠反应较DDP联合化疗轻,治疗中应注意监测肝功能。  相似文献   

5.
目的对比分析诱导化疗加同步放化疗治疗局部晚期鼻咽癌的临床疗效。方法 148例患者随机分为治疗组与对照组,各74例。治疗组患者采用奈达铂(NDP)联合替加氟(FT-207)诱导化疗加放射治疗同步奈达铂化疗方案,对照组患者采用顺铂(DDP)联合氟尿嘧啶(5-Fu)诱导化疗加放射治疗同步顺铂化疗方案,观察两组患者的临床疗效、生存率和不良反应发生情况。结果治疗组患者鼻咽部肿瘤完全消退率为95.9%,有效率为98.6%;颈部淋巴结完全消退率为94.6%,有效率为98.6%。对照组患者鼻咽部肿瘤完全消退率为93.2%,有效率为98.64%;颈部淋巴结完全消退率为89.2%,有效率为97.3%,两组患者近期疗效差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);诱导化疗中,治疗组患者恶心呕吐、白细胞减少发生率低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。同期化疗中,治疗组患者血小板减少发生率低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组患者总生存率、无复发生存率和无转移生存率比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论奈达铂和替加氟诱导化疗联合同期放射治疗与顺铂和氟尿嘧啶诱导化疗联合同期化疗疗效相当,而且奈达铂和替加氟方案消化道不良反应、白细胞减少情况优于顺铂和氟尿嘧啶方案,值得推广,远期疗效有待观察。  相似文献   

6.
蕈烨 《实用肿瘤杂志》2013,28(4):414-416
目的 比较紫杉醇联合顺铂或奈达铂新辅助化疗治疗局部晚期子宫颈癌的疗效和不良反应.方法 49例局部晚期子宫颈癌患者随机分为顺铂组和奈达铂组,给予紫杉醇联合顺铂或奈达铂化疗,化疗2个疗程.评价两组的近、远期疗效和不良反应.结果 顺铂组总缓解率为79.2%,临床获益率为100.0%,奈达铂组总缓解率为76.0%,临床获益率为100.0%.两组比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05).各组化疗前后肿瘤大小比较差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05),但两组组间比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).顺铂组Ⅰ、Ⅱ级胃肠道反应、肌酐升高和血红蛋白下降的发生率明显高于奈达铂组(P<0.05),但其Ⅰ、Ⅱ级血小板减少的发生率明显低于奈达铂组(P<0.05).顺铂组1、2、3年生存率分别为91.7%、83.3%和79.2%,奈达铂组1、2、3年生存率分别为88.0%、84.0%和76.0%,两组比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论 紫杉醇联合顺铂或奈达铂新辅助化疗治疗局部晚期子宫颈癌患者的近、远期疗效相似,但奈达铂不良反应相对低,临床更易耐受.  相似文献   

7.
目的:观察吉西他滨联合奈达铂与联合顺铂方案治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的疗效和安全性。方法:60例中晚期非小细胞肺癌患者,其中吉西他滨联合奈达铂化疗方案组(GN组)30例,吉西他滨1000mg/m^2,第1、8天,静脉滴注30分钟,奈达铂80mg/m^2,第2天,滴注时间大于1小时;吉西他滨联合顺铂化疗方案组(GP组)30例,吉西他滨1 000mg/m^2,第1、8天,静脉滴注30分钟,顺铂80-100 mg/m^2,分3d,常规水化利尿。以上2组方案均21天为一个周期。结果:GN组有效率36.67%,GP组有效率40.00%,两组间无显著差异(P〉0.05);GP组胃肠道反应(80%)发生率明显高于GN组(56.7%)(P〈0.05);两组肾脏毒性无明显差异;两组白细胞下降发生率分别为56.7%和50.0%,奈达铂组明显(P〉0.05);血小板下降GN组(73.3%)较GP组(66.7%)显著(P〉0.05),但无统计学差异。结论:吉西他滨联合奈达铂治疗晚期NSCLC的有效率不低于吉西他滨联合顺铂方案,胃肠道毒性较轻,不良反应主要为骨髓抑制及过敏反应。  相似文献   

8.
目的:比较分析含奈达铂联合方案与含卡铂联合方案同期放化治疗Ⅳ期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的疗效和不良反应.方法:经病理学和/或细胞学证实的Ⅳ期非小细胞肺癌42例,随机分成试验组(含奈达铂)20例(其中2例后期改为顺铂),对照组(含卡铂)22例(其中1例后期改为顺铂).同期放化疗,化疗方案为紫杉醇或多西紫杉醇+奈达铂或卡铂,21天~28天/周期,2周期~4周期.放疗方法为三维适形后程加速超分割放疗,处方剂量为51Gy~76Gy.结果:试验组有效率((CR+PR)%)77.8%,对照组72.7%(P>0.05);试验组白细胞、血小板、血红蛋白下降、恶心呕吐、脱发发生率分别为72.2%、55.6%、50%、66.7%和72.2%,对照组分别为72.7%、50%、57.1%、57.1%和76.2%(P均>0.05),试验组Ⅲ度~Ⅳ度白细胞、血小板和血红蛋白下降发生率分别为5.6%、11.1%和5.6%,无Ⅲ度~Ⅳ度恶心呕吐;对照组分别为27.3%、27.3%、19.1%,Ⅲ度~Ⅳ度恶心呕吐发生率为4.8%(P均>0.05).试验组有2例发生奈达铂过敏反应.结论:含奈达铂方案是治疗Ⅳ期NSCLC的有效方案,可取得与含卡铂方案相近的有效率及生存状况,在某些毒性反应方面显示出一定优势.  相似文献   

9.
羟基喜树碱联合长春地辛与顺铂治疗晚期NSCLC临床观察   总被引:6,自引:0,他引:6  
羟基喜树碱(hydroxycamptothecin,HCPT)是拓扑异构酶Ⅰ抑制剂,临床应用已20余年,但用于治疗NSCLC的临床资料甚少。1998年6月至1999年7月,我们用HCPT联合长春地辛(VDS)与顺铂(DDP)治疗晚期NSCLC31例,观察近期、远期疗效和不良反应,探讨HCPT在NSCLC化疗中的作用。  相似文献   

10.
目的对比观察奈达铂(NDP)联合多西他赛(TXT)及多西他赛单药二线治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的疗效、安全性及生存期。方法人组病例为一线化疗失败的晚期NSCLC患者。联合组:奈达铂80mg/m^2加入等渗盐水500mL中静滴2h,第2天;多西他赛75mg/m^2静滴,第1天,每21天为1周期。单药组:多西他赛75mg/m^2静滴,第1天,每21天为1周期。每例至少接受2个周期化疗后评价疗效,患者最多接受6个周期化疗。结果联合组28例中CR0例,PR7例,总有效率25.0%,疾病控制率71.4%;单药组23例中CR0例,PR4例,总有效率13.0%,疾病控制率60.9%。中位疾病进展时间联合组5.2个月,单药组4.4个月,无显著差异。联合组白细胞下降24例,占85.7%,其中Ⅲ/Ⅳ度占28.5%,血红蛋白和血小板下降分别占21.4%和42.8%,有2例Ⅲ度血小板下降。单药组白细胞下降11例,占47.8%,其中Ⅲ/Ⅳ度占4.35%,血红蛋白和血小板下降分别占17.4%和13.0%,均为Ⅰ度下降。两组比较血液学毒性差异有显著性。结论奈达铂联合多西他赛二线治疗晚期NSCLC有较好疗效,毒副反应可防可控,可供临床安全使用。  相似文献   

11.
Background In Japan, chemotherapeutic agents that have been approved for the treatment of esophageal cancer include cisplatin, nedaplatin, 5-fluorouracil, vindesine, and docetaxel. We retrospectively investigated the efficacy and toxicity of a combination of nedaplatin plus vindesine, or docetaxel alone, for patients with unresectable or recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus refractory to prior chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil plus platinum. Methods Nedaplatin was administered at 90 mg/m2 intravenously on day 1, and vindesine was administered at 3 mg/m2 intravenously on days 1 and 8 every 28 days. Docetaxel 60 mg/m2 or 70 mg/m2 was administered intravenously every 21 days. We analyzed the response rate, overall survival time, progression-free survival time, and toxicity in 24 patients treated with nedaplatin plus vindesine and 28 patients treated with docetaxel. Results In patients treated with nedaplatin plus vindesine, the response rate of the 13 patients with measurable lesions was 8% (1/13), the median progression-free survival time was 1.8 months, and the median survival time was 5.5 months. In patients treated with docetaxel, the response rate of the 17 patients with measurable lesions was 18% (3/17), the median progression-free survival time was 2.1 months, and the median survival time was 5.1 months. The most frequent toxicity was neutropenia (grade 4; 13% in the group with nedaplatin plus vindesine and 50% in the docetaxel group), and febrile neutropenia (grade 3; 4% and 18%, respectively). Conclusion The efficacy of the two regimens for unresectable or recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus refractory to chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil plus platinum was unsatisfactory. New, more effective therapies are needed.  相似文献   

12.
A new platinum complex, nedaplatin, has been reported to be effective for both ovarian and cervical cancers. We designated a phase I dose-escalation study of a combination chemotherapy of nedaplatin and cisplatin to investigate the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Six patients, including two with advanced cervical cancer, three with ovarian clear cell adenocarcinoma and one with endometrial clear cell adenocarcinoma, were enrolled in this study. The doses of the two agents were escalated alternatively, i.e., a tandem method, from 40 to 80 mg/m2 by 20 mg/m2. Nedaplatin and cisplatin were administrated by intravenous drip infusion and repeated after an interval of at least 4 weeks, as a rule. The major toxicity observed was hematotoxicity. One of the 6 patients dropped out of this study because of severe hematotoxicity after 80 mg/m2 of nedaplatin and 60 mg/m2 of cisplatin were administered. With a dose of 80 mg/m2 nedaplatin and 80 mg/m2 cisplatin, severe neutropenia was found in all 6 patients, and thrombocytopenia and anemia were found in 1 patient, respectively. A slight hearing loss was detected by audiometry in 5 patients, but no one was inconvenienced in daily life. Mild nausea and vomiting were also observed in all 6 patients. In conclusion, the DLT of this combination therapy was hematotoxicity and the MTD was 80 mg/m2 for nedaplatin and 60 mg/m2 for cisplatin, respectively. Thus, 60 mg/m2 of nedaplatin and 60 mg/m2 of cisplatin may be recommended for combined administration.  相似文献   

13.
Purpose: To compare the in vitro cytotoxicity of nedaplatin, an investigational platinum analog, with that of the standard platinum agents, cisplatin and carboplatin, against fresh human, epithelial ovarian cancers. Methods: The Hamburger-Salmon human tumor colony-forming assay (HTCA) was used to measure the chemosensitivity of 36 fresh tumor samples obtained during initial exploratory laparotomy from patients with newly diagnosed stage III – IV epithelial ovarian cancer who had received no prior chemotherapy or radiation therapy. Tumor samples were exposed to the platinum analogs for 1 h at concentrations of 10 and 100 μg/ml of nedaplatin and cisplatin and 100 and 1000 μg/ml of carboplatin. The resulting survival data were used to estimate the IC50 (drug concentration associated with 50% inhibition of tumor colony forming units, TCFUs) of each of the platinum analogs for each of the tumor samples, as well as the estimated survival following exposure to clinically achievable drug levels (i.e. the ultrafiltrable platinum area under the plasma disappearance curve, AUC, achieved in cancer patients following administration of standard or phase II doses). Results: At the lowest concentration tested (i.e. 10 μg/ml nedaplatin and cisplatin and 100 μg/ml carboplatin) the percentages of tumor samples which were sensitive (as defined by 50% or less survival of TCFUs as compared with controls) were 42, 50, and 40% for nedaplatin, cisplatin and carboplatin, respectively. The median IC50 values were 28.5, 12 and 121 μg/ml for nedaplatin, cisplatin and carboplatin, respectively. The estimated percentage of tumors sensitive to clinically achievable dose levels was 42% for nedaplatin and 36% for cisplatin and carboplatin. Nedaplatin and carboplatin proved relatively crossresistant with cisplatin in vitro; of the 18 tumor samples which were resistant to cisplatin, only 5 (28%) were sensitive to nedaplatin and 3 of 17 (18%) were sensitive to carboplatin. Conclusion: Nedaplatin was associated with cytotoxicity similar to cisplatin and carboplatin in this study. Although nedaplatin appears to be crossresistant with cisplatin, its high rate of in vitro cytotoxicity, relative lack of neurotoxicity and nephrotoxicity, and large in vivo bioavailability establish nedaplatin as a promising platinum analog for further clinical development as a salvage and primary chemotherapeutic agent for patients with advanced ovarian cancer. Received: 7 November 1995 / Accepted: 20 September 1996  相似文献   

14.
目的 对比分析奈达铂和顺铂联合紫杉醇同步放化疗治疗中晚期宫颈癌的疗效及毒副作用.方法 选择中晚期宫颈癌患者66例,按照随机数字法分为奈达铂组和顺铂组,各33例.奈达铂组采用紫杉醇35 mg/m2+奈达铂20 mg/m2同步放疗治疗,顺铂组采用紫杉醇35 mg/m2+顺铂20 mg/m2同步放疗治疗.结果 奈达铂组治疗的有效率为97.0%,顺铂组治疗的有效率为90.7%,2组差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).奈达铂组患者贫血以Ⅰ级为主,顺铂组患者贫血以Ⅰ~Ⅱ为主,2组差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);中性粒细胞减少、血小板减少、恶心呕吐、腹泻、肝肾功能损伤的发生情况2组无统计学差异(P>0.05).奈达铂组患者的1、2、3年生存率分别为87.8%,75.7%和57.6%,顺铂组患者的1、2、3年生存率分别为82.7%,63.6%和54.5%,其中奈达铂组1年和2年生存率显著高于顺铂组(P<0.05).结论 奈达铂和紫杉醇同步放疗治疗中晚期宫颈癌疗效显著,患者依从性好,不良反应尚可耐受.  相似文献   

15.
目的:评价奈达铂和氟尿嘧啶化疗联合同步放疗治疗Ⅲ、Ⅳa期鼻咽癌的局控率、生存率和毒副反应。方法:回顾性分析奈达铂 氟尿嘧啶化疗联合同步放疗治疗Ⅲ、Ⅳa期鼻咽癌30例的局控率、生存率和毒副反应,并与单纯放疗30例相比较。结果:CR率放化组为93.33%,单放组为73.33%,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);1年无复发生存率和1年无远处转移生存率放化组分别为93.33%和86.67%,单放组分别为83.33%和73.33%,两组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);治疗毒副反应:放化组恶心呕吐高于单放组,主要是轻中度,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);放化组骨髓抑制较单放组明显(P<0.05),且放化组有1例在第3周期化疗后发生Ⅳ度血小板下降;放化组皮肤反应无明显加重(P>0.05),但Ⅲ、Ⅳ度口腔黏膜反应与单放组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:奈达铂 氟尿嘧啶同期放化疗治疗Ⅲ、Ⅳa期鼻咽癌近期疗效确切,毒副反应较低,患者耐受性良好。  相似文献   

16.
VlP与MVP方案治疗非小细胞肺癌的对照研究   总被引:7,自引:1,他引:6  
徐瑞华  姜文奇 《癌症》1999,18(6):711-713
目的:通过前瞻性对照研究,比较VIP方案与MVP方案治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的疗效及不良反应。方法:共53例晚期的非小肺癌患者随机入组,治疗应用VIP方案(VDS+IFO+DDP),对照组应用MVP方案(MMC+VDS+DDP),每例病人至少化疗2疗程。疗效及不良反应评价均按WHO标准进行,每例病人随访生存期。结果:治疗组中1例CR,15例PR,8例SD,1例PD,有效率(CR+PR)为64.0%;对  相似文献   

17.
BACKGROUND: Nedaplatin, a platinum analog with less renal toxicity and similar efficacy for cervical carcinoma, recently has been shown to have a synergistic effect on cervical carcinoma lines in combination with cisplatin. To determine the clinical efficacy of this combination in patients with cervical carcinoma, the authors conducted a Phase I/II study of intravenous nedaplatin and intraarterial cisplatin combined with transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE). METHODS: Eligibility criteria were as follows: cervical carcinoma (Stages IB2-IV; International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics), 16-70 years of age, performance status between 0 and 2, and adequate bone marrow, renal, and hepatic function. Nedaplatin (40-70 mg/m2) was administered intravenously on Day 1 followed by intraarterial administration of cisplatin (70 mg/m2) on Day 3 via both uterine arteries by using the Seldinger method. This then was followed by TAE. This course of treatment was repeated every 3 weeks for 3 cycles. RESULTS: Patient data were as follows: age 37-68 (median, 55 years) and Stages IB2:4, IIA:3, IIB:2, IIIA:1, IIIB:3, IVA:2 carcinoma. The response to therapy was defined by magnetic resonance imaging as follows: partial response in 60% (9 of 15) of patients, complete response in 40% (6 of 15) of patients, and an overall response rate of 100% (95% confidence interval, 78-100%). Myelosuppression was manageable. Grade 3/4 renal toxicity was observed in 2 patients who received 70 mg/m2 of nedaplatin. Thirteen patients received radical hysterectomy, 1 patient received lymph node sampling, and 11 patients received adjuvant radiotherapy or chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: The maximum tolerable dose was 70 mg/m2 nedaplatin, and the dose-limiting toxicity was renal toxicity. The recommended dose was 60 mg/m2 nedaplatin intravenously followed by 70 mg/m2 cisplatin intraarterially. Intravenous nedaplatin followed by intraarterial cisplatin with TAE appears to be very effective for locally advanced cervical carcinoma.  相似文献   

18.
目的 奈达铂对比顺铂用于不可手术局部晚期非小细胞癌(NSCLC)同步放化疗的疗效和不良反应。方法2015-2016年间在我院无法手术的局部晚期NSCLC患者 122例接受同步放化疗,其中接受奈达铂为基础双药同步放化疗(奈达铂组)38例,接受顺铂为基础的双药同步放化疗(顺铂组)84例。化疗方案为铂类与紫杉醇或依托泊苷联用,腺癌患者可以选择铂类与培美曲塞联用。全组患者中位年龄 58岁;大多数患者为男性(86.1%);有吸烟史患者占77.0%。63.9%患者病理类型为鳞癌;ⅢB期患者占59.0%。 结果 奈达铂组和顺铂组的整体反应率分别为79%和86%;疾病控制率分别为94%和94%。中位随访时间20个月。奈达铂组1、2年无进展生存率分别为49%、23%,顺铂组分别为67%、39%(P=0.160);奈达铂组的1、2年总生存率分别为91%、72%,顺铂组分别为89%和68%(P=0.552)。≥3级不良反应奈达铂组有 9例(24%),顺铂组有 25例(30%)(P=0.488);奈达铂组仅 1例放射性肺炎,而顺铂组有 2例患者死于放射性肺炎。 结论 对于不可手术的局部晚期NSCLC,奈达铂为基础双药方案可能成为与胸部放疗联合时的新选择。奈达铂与顺铂疗效相当,不良反应更小,尤其适用于年龄偏大、耐受性稍差的患者。  相似文献   

设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号