Molecular Subtypes of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma Are Associated With Outcome During Pazopanib Therapy in the Metastatic Setting

Background

We previously described 4 molecular subtypes of metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (mccRCC), named ccrcc1-4 (Beuselinck et al, 2015). These have both prognostic and predictive value for patients treated with first-line sunitinib, with distinctive objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). The ccrcc2 and ccrcc3 tumors have the best outcomes, followed by ccrcc1 and then ccrcc4. We hypothesized that these molecular subtypes would show similar outcomes with first-line pazopanib treatment.

Validation of the IMDC Prognostic Model in Patients With Metastatic Renal-Cell Carcinoma Treated With First-Line Axitinib: A Multicenter Retrospective Study

BackgroundThe objective of the study was to validate the characteristics of the International Metastatic Renal-Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC) prognostic model in patients treated with first-line axitinib in clinical practice.Patients and MethodsWe retrospectively evaluated 143 patients with metastatic renal-cell carcinoma who were treated with axitinib as the first-line therapy between October 2008 and February 2019. Overall survival (OS) was evaluated according to the IMDC prognostic model. We investigated the intragroup heterogeneity in the intermediate-risk group and divided these patients according to abnormal C-reactive protein (CRP) levels. An inverse probability of treatment-weighted (IPTW)-adjusted Cox regression analysis was performed to evaluate the effects of the CRP-risk model of OS in the patients in the IMDC intermediate-risk group.ResultsA significant difference in OS was observed in patients in the IMDC intermediate- and poor-risk group, although no significant difference was observed between the IMDC favorable- and intermediate-risk group. Significantly shorter prognosis was observed in patients in the IMDC intermediate-risk group who had 2 risk factors and CRP ≥0.3 mg/dL (inter-high group) than in those with 1 risk factor or 2 risk factors with CRP <0.3 mg/dL (inter-low group). IPTW-adjusted Cox regression analysis revealed significant differences in the OS between the inter-low and inter-high groups.ConclusionThe IMDC prognostic model was active in patients who received first-line axitinib treatment. The combination of CRP value with the number of positive risk factors in the IMDC model might predict prognosis in patients with IMDC intermediate-risk treated with first-line axitinib.     

Sarcomatoid Dedifferentiation in Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma and Outcome on Treatment With Anti–Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors: A Retrospective Analysis

IntroductionThis study aimed to assess the efficacy of anti–vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (anti-VEGFR-TKIs) in patients with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (m-ccRCC) with sarcomatoid dedifferentiation.Patients and MethodsThe files of all patients with m-ccRCC consecutively treated with first-line anti-VEGFR-TKIs at the authors' institution were retrospectively reviewed. Pathology slides from nephrectomy and metastasectomy were assessed for the presence and extent of sarcomatoid dedifferentiation.ResultsA total of 124 patients were included; nephrectomy and metastasectomy specimens were available in 117 and 35 patients, respectively. Thirty percent of the primary nephrectomy specimens had sarcomatoid features, and the median involvement of the sarcomatoid component was 21% (range, 1%-95%). Patients with an important sarcomatoid component, defined as ≥ 25% involvement of the tumor, had a very poor outcome: progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 3 and 6 months, respectively, and no partial responses (PR) were observed. Patients without sarcomatoid dedifferentiation or with sarcomatoid involvement < 25% had a PFS of 12 months (P < .0001; hazard ratio [HR], 51; 95% CI, 12.58-207.3), an OS of 22 months (P < .0001, HR, 10.72; 95% CI, 3.56-32.25), and a PR rate of 50% (P = .0015). Patients with a sarcomatoid component ≥ 25% in the metastasectomy also had a poorer PFS and OS on anti-VEGFR-TKIs compared with patients with < 25% of sarcomatoid features at these sites.ConclusionPatients with m-ccRCC whose tumors contain a component of sarcomatoid dedifferentiation of ≥ 25% of the total tumor volume have a very poor outcome when treated with anti-VEGFR-TKIs. Analysis of the extent of sarcomatoid features in resected metastases can provide additional prognostic information.     

Shorter Survival in Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma Patients With High PD-L1 Expression Associated With Sarcomatoid or Biphasic Histology Subtype: A Series of 214 Cases From the Bio-MAPS Cohort

BackgroundAnticancer immune responses are negatively regulated by programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) T-cell membrane protein interaction with its ligand, programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1), on cancer cells. We sought to assess the prognostic role of PD-L1 expression in tumor samples from patients enrolled onto the IFCT-0701 MAPS randomized phase 3 trial (NCT00651456).Patients and MethodsTumor samples were analyzed by immunohistochemistry for percentages of PD-L1 membrane-stained tumor cells using the E1L3N clone, and data were correlated to survival by multivariate Cox models including stratification variables.ResultsPD-L1 staining was assessed in 214 (47.75%) of 448 patients. Epithelioid subtype represented 83.7% (179/214). Absence of PD-L1 staining occurred in 137 (64.1%) of 214 malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) samples, while 77 (35.9%) of 214 were PD-L1 positive, with 50 (64.9%) of 77 showing < 50% PD-L1–expressing tumor cells. Sarcomatoid/biphasic subtypes were more commonly PD-L1 positive than epithelioid subtype (P < .001). In patients with 1% or more PD-L1–stained tumor cells, median overall survival (OS) was 12.3 months versus 22.2 months for other patients (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.25; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.93-1.67; P = .14). OS did not differ according to PD-L1 positivity in multivariate analyses (adjusted HR = 1.10; 95% CI, 0.81-1.49; P = .55). With a 50% cutoff, PD-L1–positive patients displayed a 10.5 months median OS versus 19.3 months for patients with lower PD-L1 expression (HR = 1.93; 95% CI, 1.27-2.93; P = .002). OS did not significantly differ in adjusted Cox models (adjusted HR = 1.20; 95% CI, 0.74-1.94; P = .47). In the 179 epithelioid MPM patients, high PD-L1 staining (≥ 50% of tumor cells) negatively affected OS, although not significantly, showing a 12.3-month median OS (95% CI, 4.3-21.6) versus 23-month (95% CI, 18.5-25.2) for patients with tumor PD-L1 staining in < 50% cells (P = .071). The progression-free survival (PFS) differences were statistically significant, with a longer 9.9-month median PFS in patients with low PD-L1 staining (< 50% cells) compared to 6.7 months of median PFS in patients with high PD-L1 expression (≥ 50% cells) (P = .0047).ConclusionAlthough high PD-L1 tumor cell expression was associated with poorer OS in MPM patients from the MAPS trial, its prognostic influence was lost in multivariate analyses in the whole cohort, while PD-L1 expression was strongly associated with the sarcomatoid/biphasic subtypes. In the epithelioid MPM subset of patients, high PD-L1 tumor expression (≥ 50%) negatively affected OS and PFS, with this prognostic influence remaining statistically significant for PFS after adjustment in multivariate Cox model.     

Cabozantinib Versus Sunitinib for Untreated Patients with Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma of Intermediate or Poor Risk: Subgroup Analysis of the Alliance A031203 CABOSUN trial

Cabozantinib treatment prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) and improved objective response rate (ORR) compared with sunitinib in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) of intermediate or poor risk by International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC) criteria in the phase II CABOSUN trial (NCT01835158). In the trial, 157 patients were randomized 1:1 to receive cabozantinib or sunitinib, stratified by IMDC risk group and presence of bone metastases. Here, PFS and ORR, both determined by independent radiology committee (IRC), were analyzed by subgroups of baseline characteristics. Cabozantinib treatment was generally associated with improved PFS and ORR versus sunitinib across subgroups, including in groups defined by IMDC risk group, bone metastases, age, and tumor burden. Clinical trial identification number. NCT01835158.     

A cytokine and angiogenic factor (CAF) analysis in plasma for selection of sorafenib therapy in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma

BackgroundWe investigated cytokines and angiogenic factors (CAFs) in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) treated in a randomized phase II clinical trial of sorafenib versus sorafenib+ interferon-α (IFN-α) that yielded no differences in progression-free survival (PFS). We aimed to link the CAF profile to PFS and select candidate predictive and prognostic markers for further study.MethodsThe concentrations of 52 plasma CAFs were measured pretreatment (n = 69), day 28, and day 56 using multiplex bead arrays and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. We investigated the association between baseline levels of CAFs with PFS and posttreatment changes.ResultsUnsupervised CAF clustering analysis revealed two distinct mRCC patient groups with elevated proangiogenic or proinflammatory mediators. A six-marker baseline CAF signature [osteopontin, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), carbonic anhydrase 9, collagen IV, VEGF receptor-2, and tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand] correlated with PFS benefit (hazard ratio 0.20 versus 2.25, signature negative versus positive, respectively; P = 0.0002). While changes in angiogenic factors were frequently attenuated by the sorafenib+ IFN combination, most key immunomodulatory mediators increased.ConclusionsUsing CAF profiling, we identified two mRCC patient groups, a candidate plasma signature for predicting PFS benefit, and distinct marker changes occurring with each treatment. This platform may provide valuable insights into renal cell carcinoma biology and the molecular consequences of targeted therapies.     

Molecular Subtypes and Gene Expression Signatures as Prognostic Features in Fully Resected Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Tailored Approach to Adjuvant Trials

BackgroundTrials with adjuvant vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (VEGFR-TKIs) failed to demonstrate meaningful benefit in clinically high-risk, fully resected clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). We evaluated whether the ccrcc1-4 molecular subtypes and gene expression signatures (GES) are associated with outcomes in this setting.Materials and MethodsWe determined molecular subtypes as well as angiogenesis- and immune-related GES through RNA sequencing of 75 fresh frozen (FF) and 62 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumor samples. We studied disease-free (DFS) and overall survival (OS) and determined correlations among GES and Leibovich score.ResultsAngiogenesis-related GES and molecular subtypes were associated with longer DFS and OS across both cohorts, whereas immune-related GES were not. In the FF cohort, molecular subtypes (ccrcc2 & 3 vs. ccrcc1 & 4) were associated with DFS and OS, on bivariable analysis with Leibovich score (HR 0.62, 95%CI 0.39-0.98, P = .04 and HR 0.35, 95%CI 0.19-0.64, P < .001). In the FFPE cohort, molecular subtypes (ccrcc2 & 3 vs. ccrcc1&4) were also associated with DFS (HR 0.53, 95%CI 0.31-0.93, P = .03), but not OS (HR 0.59, 95%CI 0.31-1.13, P = .11) on bivariable analysis with Leibovich score. Leibovich score was significantly inversely correlated with all angiogenesis-related GES (all P < .01), but not correlated with immune-related GES.ConclusionsMolecular subtypes and angiogenesis-related GES are prognostic for DFS and OS in fully resected, localized ccRCC. Favorable ccrcc2 & 3 molecular subtypes with high angiogenesis-related GES, which respond best to VEGFR-TKIs, are at lower risk of relapse but were probably underrepresented in the adjuvant VEGFR-TKI trials since they inversely correlate with Leibovich score. Conversely, immune-related GES are not correlated with Leibovich score and clinically high-risk tumors can display both high and low immune-related GES. Therefore, molecular characterization could guide patient selection for adjuvant treatment.     

Sunitinib in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: updated progression-free survival and final overall survival from a phase III randomized study

BackgroundIn a phase III trial in patients with advanced, well-differentiated, progressive pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, sunitinib 37.5 mg/day improved investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS) versus placebo (11.4 versus 5.5 months; HR, 0.42; P < 0.001). Here, we present PFS using retrospective blinded independent central review (BICR) and final median overall survival (OS), including an assessment highlighting the impact of patient crossover from placebo to sunitinib.Patients and methodsIn this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, cross-sectional imaging from patients was evaluated retrospectively by blinded third-party radiologists using a two-reader, two-time-point lock, followed by a sequential locked-read, batch-mode paradigm. OS was summarized using the Kaplan–Meier method and Cox proportional hazards model. Crossover-adjusted OS effect was derived using rank-preserving structural failure time (RPSFT) analyses.ResultsOf 171 randomized patients (sunitinib, n = 86; placebo, n = 85), 160 (94%) had complete scan sets/time points. By BICR, median (95% confidence interval [CI]) PFS was 12.6 (11.1–20.6) months for sunitinib and 5.8 (3.8–7.2) months for placebo (HR, 0.32; 95% CI 0.18–0.55; P = 0.000015). Five years after study closure, median (95% CI) OS was 38.6 (25.6–56.4) months for sunitinib and 29.1 (16.4–36.8) months for placebo (HR, 0.73; 95% CI 0.50–1.06; P = 0.094), with 69% of placebo patients having crossed over to sunitinib. RPSFT analysis confirmed an OS benefit for sunitinib.ConclusionsBICR confirmed the doubling of PFS with sunitinib compared with placebo. Although the observed median OS improved by nearly 10 months, the effect estimate did not reach statistical significance, potentially due to crossover from placebo to sunitinib.Trial registration numberNCT00428597.     

Targeted agents in metastatic Xp11 translocation/TFE3 gene fusion renal cell carcinoma (RCC): a report from the Juvenile RCC Network

BackgroundXp11 translocation renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is an RCC subtype affecting 15% of RCC patients <45 years. We analyzed the benefit of targeted therapy [vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR)-targeted agents and/or mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors] in these patients.Patients and methodsPatients with Xp11 translocation/TFE3 fusion gene metastatic RCC who had received targeted therapy were identified. Nuclear TFE3 positivity was confirmed by reviewing pathology slides. Responses according to RECIST criteria, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were analyzed.ResultsOverall, 53 patients were identified; 23 had metastatic disease, and of these 21 had received targeted therapy (median age 34 years). Seven patients achieved an objective response. In first line, median PFS was 8.2 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 2.6–14.7 months] for sunitinib (n = 11) versus 2 months (95% CI 0.8–3.3 months) for cytokines (n = 9) (log-rank P = 0.003). Results for further treatment (second, third, or fourth line) were as follows: all three patients receiving sunitinib had a partial response (median PFS 11 months). Seven of eight patients receiving sorafenib had stable disease (median PFS 6 months). One patient receiving mTOR inhibitors had a partial response and six patients had stable disease. Median OS was 27 months with a 19 months median follow-up.ConclusionIn Xp11 translocation RCC, targeted therapy achieved objective responses and prolonged PFS similar to those reported for clear-cell RCC.     

Sunitinib-associated hypertension and neutropenia as efficacy biomarkers in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients

Background:

Metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) prognostic models may be improved by incorporating treatment-induced toxicities.

Methods:

In sunitinib-treated mRCC patients (N=770), baseline prognostic factors and treatment-induced toxicities (hypertension (systolic blood pressure ⩾140 mm Hg), neutropenia (grade ⩾2), thrombocytopenia (grade ⩾2), hand–foot syndrome (grade >0), and asthenia/fatigue (grade >0)) were analysed in multivariate analyses of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) end points.

Results:

On-treatment neutropenia and hypertension were associated with longer PFS (P=0.0276 and P<0.0001, respectively) and OS (P=0.0014 and P<0.0001, respectively), independent of baseline prognostic factors, including International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC) criteria. By 12-week landmark analysis, neutropenia was significantly associated with longer PFS and OS (P=0.013 and P=0.0122, respectively) and hypertension or hand–foot syndrome with longer OS (P=0.0036 and P=0.0218, respectively). The concordance index was 0.65 (95% CI: 0.63−0.67) for IMDC classification alone and 0.72 (95% CI: 0.70−0.74) when combined with hypertension and neutropenia. Considering hypertension and neutropenia (developing both vs neither) changed IMDC-predicted median OS in each IMDC risk group (favourable: 45.3 vs 19.5 months; intermediate: 32.5 vs 8.0 months; poor: 21.1 vs 4.8 months).

Conclusions:

On-treatment neutropenia and hypertension are independent biomarkers of sunitinib efficacy and may add prognostic accuracy to the IMDC model.     

Masitinib in advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) after failure of imatinib: A randomized controlled open-label trial

BackgroundMasitinib is a highly selective tyrosine kinase inhibitor with activity against the main oncogenic drivers of gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST). Masitinib was evaluated in patients with advanced GIST after imatinib failure or intolerance.Patients and methodsProspective, multicenter, randomized, open-label trial. Patients with inoperable, advanced imatinib-resistant GIST were randomized (1 : 1) to receive masitinib (12 mg/kg/day) or sunitinib (50 mg/day 4-weeks-on/2-weeks-off) until progression, intolerance, or refusal. Primary efficacy analysis was noncomparative, testing whether masitinib attained a median progression-free survival (PFS) (blind centrally reviewed RECIST) threshold of >3 months according to the lower bound of the 90% unilateral confidence interval (CI). Secondary analyses on overall survival (OS) and PFS were comparative with results presented according to a two-sided 95% CI.ResultsForty-four patients were randomized to receive masitinib (n = 23) or sunitinib (n = 21). Median follow-up was 14 months. Patients receiving masitinib experienced less toxicity than those receiving sunitinib, with significantly lower occurrence of severe adverse events (52% versus 91%, respectively, P = 0.008). Median PFS (central RECIST) for the noncomparative primary analysis in the masitinib treatment arm was 3.71 months (90% CI 3.65). Secondary analyses showed that median OS was significantly longer for patients receiving masitinib followed by post-progression addition of sunitinib when compared against patients treated directly with sunitinib in second-line [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.27, 95% CI 0.09–0.85, P = 0.016]. This improvement was sustainable as evidenced by 26-month follow-up OS data (HR = 0.40, 95% CI 0.16–0.96, P = 0.033); an additional 12.4 months survival advantage being reported for the masitinib treatment arm. Risk of progression while under treatment with masitinib was in the same range as for sunitinib (HR = 1.1, 95% CI 0.6–2.2, P = 0.833).ConclusionsPrimary efficacy analysis ensured the masitinib treatment arm could satisfy a prespecified PFS threshold. Secondary efficacy analysis showed that masitinib followed by the standard of care generated a statistically significant survival benefit over standard of care. Encouraging median OS and safety data from this well-controlled and appropriately designed randomized trial indicate a positive benefit–risk ratio. Further development of masitinib in imatinib-resistant/intolerant patients with advanced GIST is warranted.     

Systemic Therapy in Patients With Metastatic Xp11.2 Translocation Renal Cell Carcinoma

BackgroundXp11.2 translocation renal cell carcinoma (Xp11.2 tRCC) is a unique subtype with poor prognosis, its response to systemic therapy is not fully understood, we evaluated the benefit of systemic therapy in these patients.Patients and MethodsBetween May 2006 and December 2019, patients diagnosed with Xp11.2 tRCC from Peking university cancer hospital were collected. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) distributions.ResultsMetastatic Xp11.2 tRCC was found in 45 patients. The median PFS and median OS was 7.4 months (4.5-8.8) and 17.9 months (12.4-24.4), respectively. First-line treatment mainly included sunitinib (n = 14), sorafenib (n = 15), axitinib (n = 6), and pazopanib (n = 5), and the median PFS of these regimens were 7.4 months, 5.4 months, 9.4 months, 8.9 months, respectively. Two patients who received Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor - tyrosine kinase inhibitor (VEGFR-TKI) plus immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) as first line therapy had a PFS of more than 16.6 months and more than 25.6 months, respectively. Twenty-four patients received subsequent therapies, which included VEGFR-TKI/ICI, VEGFR-TKI and mTOR inhibitor. The ORR and median PFS was 33% and 7.1 months, 7.7% and 4.3 months, 0% and 2.1 months for these treatments, respectively. The estimated median OS was 17.3 months (95% CI, 11.2 to not reached) in patients with TKI/ICI treatment and 11.0 months (95% CI, 6.1 to not reached) without TKI/ICI treatment in subsequent therapies (P = .04). Patients with serous cavity effusion or IMDC poor risk groups had significantly shorter median PFS and median OS.ConclusionMetastatic Xp11.2 tRCC is an aggressive disease. VEGFR-TKI agents appeared to demonstrate some efficacy, VEGFR-TKI /ICI combination might be a useful tool for the treatment of metastatic Xp11.2 tRCC.     

Sunitinib followed by sorafenib or vice versa for metastatic renal cell carcinoma—data from the Czech registry

BackgroundSequential therapy with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), sunitinib and sorafenib, is a common treatment choice for patients with advanced/metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) despite lack of randomised trials. The aim of this retrospective registry-based study was to analyse the outcomes of RCC patients treated with sunitinib–sorafenib or sorafenib–sunitinib sequence.Patients and methodsThe Czech database containing information on patients treated for mRCC using targeted agents was used as a source of data for retrospective analysis. There were 138 patients treated with sunitinib–sorafenib sequence and 122 patients treated with sorafenib–sunitinib sequence.ResultsProgression-free survival (PFS) was 17.7 months for patients treated with sunitinib–sorafenib sequence and 18.8 months for those receiving sorafenib followed by sunitinib (P = 0.47). Overall survival (OS) at 1 year was 83% [95% confidence interval (CI) 77% to 90%] for patients treated with sunitinib–sorafenib and 84% (95% CI 77% to 91%) for sorafenib–sunitinib patients (P = 0.99). Treatment toxic effects were predictable but a significant proportion of patients (up to 14%–25% for different lines of therapy and used TKI) switched between TKIs or discontinued TKI therapy because of toxicity.ConclusionsIn contrast to most of the previously published reports, we have not observed improved PFS or OS for mRCC patients treated with the sorafenib–sunitinib sequence as compared to the sunitinib-sorafenib sequence.     

Prognostic Factors in Patients With Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma

BackgroundThe purpose of this study was to evaluate prognostic factors in patients with RCC.Materials and MethodsThe expression of several biomarkers were measured by immunohistochemistry (IHC), together with 2 analytic factors (thrombocytosis and neutrophilia), in 135 patients with advanced RCC treated with new targeted drugs (NTDs) (n = 67) and/or cytokines (CKs) (n = 68)—with 23 of the patients who received CKs also receiving NTDs—between July 1996 and February 2010. Relationships with overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were searched for.ResultsUnivariate statistical analysis revealed that high expression of hypoxia-inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α) correlated with poor prognosis in NTD treatment (PFS, 5.4 vs. 13.5, low expression months; P = .033) and CK treatment (PFS, 3.3 vs. 5.7, low expression; P = .003). Overexpression of carbonic anhydrase IX (CAIX) was associated with better prognosis with NTD treatment (OS, 32.1 vs. 7.8 months; P < .001) and CK treatment (OS, 32.9 vs. 5.9 months; P = .001). Positive PTEN was related to good prognosis with sunitinib (PFS, 15.1 vs. 6.5 months; P = .003) and CKs (OS, 13.7 vs. 7.9 months; P = .039). Increased expression of p21 was related to poor prognosis with NTD treatment (PFS, 5.9 vs. 16.8 months; P = .024) and CK treatment (PFS, 3.9 vs. 7.5 months; P < .001) Thrombocytosis was related to poor prognosis with NTDs (OS, 15.9 vs. 26.7 months; P = .007) and CKs (OS, 5.9 vs. 14.3 months; P = .010). Neutrophilia was related to poor prognosis with NTDs (OS, 17.6 vs. 25.4 months; P = .063) and CKs (OS, 5.9 vs. 12.8 months; P = .035). Multivariate analysis revealed that overexpression of CAIX was a favorable prognostic factor independent of PFS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.107; P < .001) and OS (HR, 0.055; P < .001).ConclusionsHIF-1α, PTEN, p21, thrombocytosis, neutrophilia, and CAIX in particular are useful prognostic factors in patients with advanced RCC.     

Polymorphisms in the Von Hippel–Lindau Gene Are Associated With Overall Survival in Metastatic Clear-Cell Renal-Cell Carcinoma Patients Treated With VEGFR Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors

Background

Clear-cell renal-cell carcinoma (ccRCC) is characterized by loss of a functional Von Hippel–Lindau (VHL) protein. We investigated the potential of 3 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in VHL as biomarkers in metastatic ccRCC (m-ccRCC) patients treated with vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs).

Real-world Experience With Sunitinib Treatment in Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: Clinical Outcome According to Risk Score

BackgroundADONIS is an ongoing observational study in 9 European countries, designed to evaluate treatment patterns/outcomes in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) treated with first-line sunitinib and/or second-line axitinib post sunitinib. We present an evaluation of sunitinib efficacy by risk group, in the real-world setting examined in ADONIS.Patients and MethodsPatients were enrolled at the start of first-line sunitinib treatment or second-line axitinib post sunitinib treatment. Evaluation of sunitinib efficacy was assessed by International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC) and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center risk criteria.ResultsFor all patients in this analysis (N = 467), the median progression-free survival was 23.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 16.5-28.5 months), 11.8 months (95% CI, 8.1-17.4 months), and 4.6 months (95% CI, 2.5-7.7 months) for IMDC favorable-, intermediate-, and poor-risk groups, respectively. The median overall survival was 97.1 months (95% CI, 46.3 months-not evaluable [NE]), 33.5 months (95% CI, 20.5-46.6 months), and 10.0 months (95% CI, 4.5-19.8 months) for the respective risk groups. Data on individual risk factors were available for a subgroup of patients, allowing analysis by intermediate risk by 1 versus 2 risk factors. When including this subgroup (n = 120), the median overall survival for IMDC favorable-, intermediate-1, and intermediate-2 risk factors was 21.6 months (95% CI, 16.3 months-NE), 20.5 months (15.5 months-NE), and 15.1 months (4.1 months-NE), respectively.ConclusionsFor patients overall and by risk-group stratification, survival estimates were aligned with previously published data. In patients with intermediate-1 risk, overall survival was very similar to patients with favorable risk. However, further exploration of outcome data from different sources is needed to confirm these observations.     

Skin toxicity and efficacy of sunitinib and sorafenib in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a national registry-based study

BackgroundA retrospective, registry-based analysis to assess the outcomes of metastatic renal cell cancer (mRCC) patients treated with sunitinib and sorafenib who developed dermatologic adverse events was performed.Patients and MethodsData on mRCC patients treated with sunitinib or sorafenib were obtained from the Czech Clinical Registry of Renal Cell Cancer Patients. Outcomes of patients who developed hand–foot syndrome (HFS) of any grade and/or grade 3/4 rash during the treatment were compared with patients without HFS and no, mild, or moderate rash.ResultsThe cohort included 705 patients treated with sunitinib and 365 patients treated with sorafenib. For sunitinib, the median overall survival (OS) was 43.0 months versus 31.0 months (P = 0.027) and median progression-free survival (PFS) 20.8 months versus 11.1 months (P = 0.007) for patients with versus without dermatologic toxicity, respectively. For sorafenib, the median OS and PFS were 27.9 and 24.6 months (P = 0.244), and 12.2 and 8.8 months (P = 0.050), respectively. In multivariable Cox regression, the skin toxicity was significantly associated with longer OS in the sunitinib cohort.ConclusionThe presence of skin toxicity is associated with improved OS and PFS in patients with mRCC treated with sunitinib.     

Is Axitinib Still a Valid Option for mRCC in the Second-Line Setting? Prognostic Factor Analyses From the AXIS Trial

BackgroundAxitinib resulted in significantly longer progression-free survival (PFS) versus sorafenib in patients with metastatic renal-cell carcinoma (mRCC) previously treated with sunitinib in the AXIS trial. We report post hoc analyses evaluating patient subgroups that may benefit more from axitinib in this setting.Patients and MethodsAXIS was an open-label randomized phase 3 trial (NCT00678392) in mRCC patients with disease that failed to respond to one prior systemic therapy. Univariate and multivariate analyses evaluated potential prognostic factors for improved PFS and overall survival (OS) after sunitinib. PFS and OS of axitinib versus sorafenib were assessed within subgroups identified according to these factors.ResultsOf 723 patients, 389 received first-line sunitinib; 194 and 195 were randomized to second-line axitinib and sorafenib, respectively. Identified prognostic factors were: nonbulky disease (sum of the longest diameter < 98 mm), favorable/intermediate risk disease (Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center or International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium criteria), and no bone or liver metastases. In patients with all of these prognostic factors (n = 86), significantly longer PFS was observed for axitinib versus sorafenib (hazard ratio = 0.476; 95% confidence interval, 0.263-0.863; 2-sided P = .0126). OS (hazard ratio = 0.902; 95% confidence interval, 0.457-1.780; 2-sided P = .7661) was similar between treatments. Across subgroups, PFS was generally longer in patients treated with axitinib versus sorafenib, and OS was generally similar between the two treatments.ConclusionIn patients with mRCC, axitinib remains a suitable second-line treatment option across multiple subgroups. A relevant reduction in the risk of a PFS event was observed for axitinib compared to sorafenib in selected subgroups of patients.     

Prospective study assessing hypoxia-related proteins as markers for the outcome of treatment with sunitinib in advanced clear-cell renal cell carcinoma

BackgroundPrevious studies suggest that expression of hypoxia markers may be associated with response to antiangiogenic drugs. Thus, we aimed to identify predictors of sunitinib outcome in clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC).Patients and methodsThe expression of eight key proteins related to hypoxia (CAIX, HIF1A, HIF2A, VEGFA, VEGFR1, VEGFR2, VEGFR3 and PDGFRB) and P-glycoprotein were assessed by immunohistochemistry in 67 primary ccRCC samples from prospectively recruited patients treated with first-line sunitinib. The proteins expression, VHL inactivation and EGLN3 mRNA content were compared with the patients' response to sunitinib.ResultsHigh expression of HIF2A and PDGFRB was associated with better sunitinib RECIST objective response (P = 0.024 and P = 0.026; respectively) and increased VEGFR3 expression was associated with longer progression-free survival (P = 0.012). VEGFR3 overexpression showed a negative correlation with VEGFR3 polymorphism rs307826 (P = 0.002), a sunitinib resistance predictor. With respect to overall survival (OS), high VEGFA was associated with short (P = 0.009) and HIF2A with long (P = 0.048) survival times. High EGLN3 mRNA content was associated with shorter OS (P = 0.023).ConclusionsWe found an association between several proteins involved in hypoxia and sunitinib efficacy. In addition, low VEGFR3 expression was associated with worse outcome and with VEGFR3 rs307826 variant allele, reinforcing VEGFR3 as a marker of sunitinib resistance.     

Phase II trial of second-line everolimus in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RECORD-4)

BackgroundRECORD-1 demonstrated clinical benefit of everolimus in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) previously treated with sunitinib, sorafenib, or both; prior treatment with cytokines, bevacizumab, and chemotherapy was also permitted. RECORD-4 prospectively assessed everolimus in a purely second-line setting.MethodsPatients with clear-cell mRCC were enrolled into one of three cohorts based on first-line therapy with sunitinib, other anti-VEGF agents, or cytokines. Patients were treated with everolimus 10 mg/day until progression (RECIST, v1.0) or intolerance. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) per investigator review. Data cutoff was 1 September 2014, for the primary analysis and 26 June 2015, for the final overall survival (OS) analysis.ResultsEnrolled patients (N = 134) previously received sunitinib (n = 58), other anti-VEGF therapy (n = 62; sorafenib, 23; bevacizumab, 16; pazopanib, 13; tivozanib, 5; and axitinib, 3), or cytokines (n = 14). Overall median age was 59 years, and most patients were men (68%) and of favorable/intermediate MSKCC risk (52/37%). Overall median PFS was 7.8 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 5.7–11.0]; in the cohorts, it was 5.7 months (95% CI 3.7–11.3) with previous sunitinib, 7.8 months (95% CI 5.7–11.0) with other previous anti-VEGF therapy, and 12.9 months [95% CI 2.6–not estimable (NE)] with previous cytokines. Overall, 67% of patients achieved stable disease as their best objective response. At final OS analysis, total median OS was 23.8 months (95% CI 17.0–NE) and, in the cohorts, it was 23.8 months (95% CI 13.7–NE) with previous sunitinib, 17.2 months (95% CI 11.9–NE) with other previous anti-VEGF therapy, and NE (95% CI 15.9–NE) with previous cytokine-based therapy. Overall, 56% of patients experienced grade 3 or 4 adverse events (regardless of relationship to study drug).ConclusionsThese results confirm the PFS benefit of second-line everolimus after first-line sunitinib or other anti-VEGF therapies. The safety profile of everolimus was consistent with previous experience.Clinical trial name and identifierEverolimus as Second-line Therapy in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma (RECORD-4), ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT01491672.