A case of resected huge ileocolonic mesenteric liposarcoma which responded to pre-operative chemotherapy using doxorubicin, cisplatin and ifosfamide

Primary mesenteric liposarcoma is a rare entity that has been reported only 14 times in English literature. The treatment strategy for mesenteric liposarcoma is, if no distant metastases are detected, surgical resection with a wide surgical margin, often followed by radiation and/or adjuvant chemotherapy for high-risk patients. However, the efficacy of pre-operative chemotherapy is unknown. If the tumor is shrunk by pre-operative chemotherapy, we could achieve complete surgical resection, which is difficult when the tumor is too large or is invading neighboring organs. We herein describe a case of huge mesenteric liposarcoma that showed significant tumor shrinkage by pre-operative chemotherapy using doxorubicin, cisplatin and ifosfamide, allowing a margin-negative operation.     

Comparison of Efficacy and Toxicity of First Line Chemotherapy with or without Epirubicin for Patients with Advanced Stage Soft Tissue Sarcoma

Purpose: To compare the safety and efficacy of first-line chemotherapy regimen with or without doxorubicin intreating patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma (STS). Patients and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed acohort of 56 patients histologically confirmed with STS who were treated at Jiangsu Cancer Hospital and ResearchInstitute from July 2011 to June 2012.The basic element of first line chemotherapy contained epirubicin in groupB and lacked epirubicin in group A. Response was assessed using RECIST criteria. The Kaplan-Meier methodwas used to estimate progress free survival (PFS). Results: According to RECIST criteria , patients in grouptreated by chemotherapy without epirubicin, the objective response (OR) ratio was 6.5 % (CR0%+PR6.5%).Disease control rate (DCR=CR+PR+SD) was 25.8% with a median follow-up of 14.6 months, including 2 patientsachieving a partial response (PR 6.5%) and a stable response (SD 19.4%) in 6. In group B with epirubicin basedregimens, no patient had complete response, PR (28 %) was observed in 7 and SD (24 %) in 6. DCR was observedin 13 patients (52%). By Fisher’s exact test, the DCR difference between the two groups was statistically significant(p=0.046). In group A, median PFS was 3.0 months (95%CI:2.1-3.8), compared with 4.0 months (95% CI:3.03-4.97) in group B (p=0.0397 by log-rank test). Epirubicin based chemotherapy and ECOG performance status 0-1were identified as favorable factors for progression in our cohort of patients. Differences of nonhematologic andhematologic toxicities were not statistically significant between the two groups, and the addition of epirobicinwas not associated with cardiac toxicity (p=0.446). Conclusion: Our study demonstrates that epirubicin-basedchemotherapy is effective and well tolerated, and is superior to chemotherapy without epirubicin regardingefficacy. Therefore it is recommended that epirubicin-based chemotherapy should be considered as first line forpatients with advanced STS.     

Results of randomised studies of the EORTC Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group (STBSG) with two different ifosfamide regimens in first- and second-line chemotherapy in advanced soft tissue sarcoma patients

The aim of this phase II study was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of two regimens of ifosfamide in metastatic soft tissue sarcoma patients given as first- and second-line chemotherapy. Two different schedules of ifosfamide were investigated in a randomised manner: Ifosfamide was given either at a dose of 5 g/m² over 24 h (5 g/m²/1 day), every 3 weeks or at a dose of 3 g/m² per day, administered over 4 h on three consecutive days (3 g/m²/3 days), every 3 weeks. Both schedules were given as first-line or second-line chemotherapy. A total of 182 patients was entered, 103 in first- and 79 in second-line, of whom 8 patients were ineligible, 5 in the first- and 3 in the second-line study. Most patients had a leiomyosarcoma, 46 of the 98 in the first-line and 34 of the 76 in the second-line. The two study arms were well balanced in both the first- and second-lines with respect to sex, age and performance status. In first-line treatment, 5 g/m²/1 day yielded five partial responses (PR) (Response Rate (RR) 10%), versus 12 PR (RR 25%) for the 3 g/m²/3 days. As second-line treatment, the 24-h infusion yielded: one CR and one PR (RR 6%) and the 3-day schedule one CR and two PR (RR 8%). Survival did not differ between the two regimens. The major World Health Organization (WHO) grade 3 and 4 toxicities encountered were: leucopenia in 19% of all courses in the first-line and 32% in the second-line with the 5 g/m²/1 day, while for the 3 g/m²/3 days schedule the rates were 57 and 63% respectively. Grade 3 or 4 infections were seen in 4% of patients treated with 5 g/m²/1 day first-line and 10% of patients given 3 g/m²/3 days, both as first- and second-lines. No such infections were seen in patients receiving 5 g/m²/1 day as second line treatment. In advanced soft-tissue sarcomas in the first-line, ifosfamide 3 g/m², given over 4 h on three consecutive days, is an active regimen with acceptable toxicity while the 5 g/m² over 24 hours schedule resulted in a disappointing response rate.     

First-line anthracycline-based chemotherapy for angiosarcoma and other soft tissue sarcoma subtypes: Pooled analysis of eleven European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group trials

BackgroundAngiosarcoma is a rare subtype of soft tissue sarcoma (STS). Doxorubicin is the standard first-line chemotherapy for advanced STS. It is not known whether angiosarcoma response to anthracycline-based chemotherapy is different to other STS subtypes.MethodsPooled data were analysed from 11 prospective randomised and non-randomised European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) clinical trials of first-line anthracycline-based chemotherapy for advanced STS. Baseline patient characteristics, chemotherapy response, progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of angiosarcoma patients were compared with other STS patients. Analysis was performed to identify factors prognostic for angiosarcoma response to chemotherapy, PFS and OS.ResultsWith a median follow-up of 4.2 years, data from 108 locally advanced and metastatic angiosarcoma patients and 2557 patients with other STS histologies were analysed. 25% of angiosarcoma patients had a complete or partial response to chemotherapy compared to 21% for other STS histotypes. The median PFS was 4.9 months and OS 9.9 months, which were not significantly different from other STS histotypes. In univariate analysis, bone metastases were an adverse prognostic factor for OS (hazard ratio (HR) 1.66, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.03–2.67; p = 0.036). Tumour grade was as an adverse prognostic factor for PFS (HR 1.72, 95% CI 1.01–2.92; p = 0.044) and OS (HR 2.03; 95% CI 1.16–3.56; p = 0.011). Compared to single agent anthracyclines, doxorubicin + ifosfamide was associated with improved PFS (HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.33–0.86; p = 0.010) and OS (HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.32–0.90; p = 0.018).ConclusionsAngiosarcoma response and survival following first-line anthracycline-based chemotherapy was similar to other STS histotypes. Our analysis provides a useful measure of angiosarcoma response to chemotherapy for comparison with future clinical trials.     

Prognostic factors in advanced synovial sarcoma: an analysis of 104 patients treated at the Royal Marsden Hospital.

AIMS: Key prognostic factors at diagnosis of synovial sarcoma are well defined from the literature. There are few data regarding prognostic parameters in the setting of advanced disease. Our aim was to look specifically at a cohort of patients with advanced synovial sarcoma and to identify potential prognostic factors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred and four patients with advanced synovial sarcoma were identified from the Royal Marsden Hospital's sarcoma database between 1978 and 2003. Patient data were analysed retrospectively. Most patients were aged between 20 and 50 years at diagnosis. Seventy-one patients were deceased at the time of analysis. Ninety-two patients received chemotherapy for management of advanced disease (most commonly doxorubicin + ifosfamide). RESULTS: Median survival following development of advanced disease was 22 months. Predictors of survival with advanced disease were age <35 years (P = 0.03) and response to first-line chemotherapy (P = 0.05). The response rate to doxorubicin plus ifosfamide was 58.6%, and this was superior to either agent when given singly. Metastasectomy was not associated with improved prognosis in this series. CONCLUSIONS: Synovial sarcoma is a chemosensitive soft tissue sarcoma. Compared with historical controls, survival with advanced disease seems to have improved over the years, possibly as a result of better use of chemotherapy. Age <35 years and response to first-line chemotherapy predict for improved survival with advanced disease.     

Gemcitabine in advanced adult soft-tissue sarcomas. A phase II study of the EORTC Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group

Gemcitabine (2'-deoxy-2'-difluorocytidine monohydrochloride) at a dose of 1250 mg/m(2) was given as a 30-min intravenous (i.v.) infusion on days 1 and 8 in a 3-weekly schedule to 32 patients with advanced soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) failing first-line chemotherapy. One patient was ineligible due to a delay between the previous chemotherapy and the start of treatment. Of the eligible patients, median age was 53 years (range 23-73 years). The predominant histological subtype was leiomyosarcoma in 12 patients (38%). The median number of cycles was three (range 1-8 cycles) with a median total dose of gemcitabine of 6.25 g/m(2) (range 1.25-19.97 g/m(2)). The relative dose intensity of gemcitabine was 96% (range 50-103%). Treatment was tolerated very well with non-complicated haematological toxicity as the most frequently observed side-effect. Only one partial tumour response was documented, giving a response rate of 3.23% (95% Confidence Interval (CI): 0.08-16.2%). The median overall survival was 268 days (95% CI: 129-377) and the median time to progression was 45 days (95% CI: 41-79). These results indicate that gemcitabine given at this dose and schedule is not active as second-line therapy in advanced STS.     

Temozolomide in adult patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma: a phase II study of the EORTC Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group

Temozolomide, an oral imidazotetrazine derivative, was given to 31 patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma. The dose of 750 mg/m² was divided over 5 consecutive days, and escalated to 1000 mg/m² over 5 days at cycle 2 if myelosuppression no worse than common toxicity criteria grade 2 was noted in the first 28-day cycle. A total of 99 treatment cycles were given to 31 patients. The drug was well tolerated, with nausea and vomiting as the most common side-effects. Only one partial tumour response was documented, giving a response rate of 3.33%, 95% confidence interval, (CI) 0.1–17.2%. The median time to progression was 8 weeks and the median survival was 27 weeks. These results indicate that temozolomide in this schedule is not active as second-line treatment in advanced soft tissue sarcoma.     

Imatinib pharmacokinetics in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumour: a retrospective population pharmacokinetic study over time. EORTC Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group

Imatinib pharmacokinetics (PK) may be affected by a number of factors that are related to the disease being treated and to the response of that disease to imatinib. Patients in the phase I and phase II trials conducted by the EORTC in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) and other sarcomas had detailed blood sampling for imatinib PK on day 1 and on day 29. Patients with GISTs also had repeat sampling, using a limited sampling strategy, after approximately 12 months on therapy. This population PK study was carried out to examine what covariates affected imatinib PK in GIST patients and what PK changes occurred over time. In the model producing the best fit, low clearance (CL) correlated with low body weight and high granulocyte count, whereas low haemoglobin correlated with low volume of distribution. For a patient with 77% of the median body weight or with 1.87 times the median granulocyte count, the apparent CL is 6.53 l/h, about 70% of the typical apparent CL of 9.33 l/h; for a patient of 84% of the typical haemoglobin level, the volume of distribution is about 70%. Total white blood cell count correlated closely with granulocyte count and there was a moderate correlation between haemoglobin and albumin (r=0.454). There was a trend towards increased imatinib clearance after chronic exposure over 12 months. The typical apparent CL increased 33% from day 1. Nevertheless, the approximate 95% confidence interval of the increase of the typical apparent CL was 33±34.6%, which contains zero. It is not yet clear whether this is a significant factor in the amelioration of imatinib toxicity that occurs with time or is related to disease control, and further work is required to confirm this observation.     

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with ifosfamide and cisplatin combination in advanced head and neck cancer: a retrospective analysis of 519 patients: a single institution experience

Advanced head and neck cancer is a major therapeutic problem in India. Ifosfamide has shown significant activity as a single agent in head and neck squamous carcinoma. In this study, we present our experience with two cycles of ifosfamide and cisplatin in the neoadjuvant setting given to a total of 519 patients. The complete response rate was 20% and the overall response rate was 80%. The treatment was well tolerated, there was no need for dose reduction, and there were no life-threatening side effects. We feel that this high response rate is sufficient to warrant more studies using ifosfamide-based combinations in a neoadjuvant setting for squamous carcinoma of the head and neck.     

Cyvadic in advanced soft tissue sarcoma: a randomized study comparing two schedules. A study of the EORTC Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group

Two hundred forty-six adults with advanced progressive soft tissue sarcoma received combination chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, vincristine, Adriamycin (doxorubicin), and DTIC. They were randomly allocated to receive the four drugs simultaneously every 4 weeks (S1: CYVADIC), or pairs of drugs (S2: ADIC-CYV) alternating at 4 weekly intervals. One hundred sixty-two patients completed 8 weeks of chemotherapy, and were considered to be evaluable for response. There were 18 complete remissions and 25 partial remissions, an overall response rate of 26%, with a highly significant difference between the two arms in favor of S1 (38% versus 14%, P = 0.001). There were no significant differences between S1 and S2 in terms of median duration of remissions (62 versus 39 weeks), and median survival of responders (85 versus 80 weeks) and of all evaluable patients (43 versus 45 weeks). Karnofsky index (KI) was the single most important prognostic factor. Patients with KI 90-100 showed a remission rate of 41% (56% on the S1 regimen) in contrast with 14% in those with KI 50-80. No patient with a KI of 50 responded to chemotherapy. The main toxicities were nausea, vomiting, anorexia, alopecia and myelosuppression, but did not differ significantly between the two regimens. Our findings suggest that stratification according to KI is essential for studies on chemotherapy for advanced soft tissue sarcomas in order to make a valuable comparison of treatment results.     

Exatecan in pretreated adult patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma: results of a phase II--study of the EORTC Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group

No standard treatment is established for patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma after previous chemotherapy with anthracyclines and ifosfamide, given either in combination or sequentially. Exatecan (DX-8951f) is a totally synthetic analogue of the topoisomerase I-inhibitor camptothecin, which was synthesised to impart increased aqueous solubility, greater tumour efficacy, and less toxicity than camptothecin itself, topotecan or irinotecan. Since some activity against soft tissue sarcomas, especially leiomyosarcomas, has been reported for topoisomerase I-inhibitors, a study with a new and more potent agent seemed justified. We report on a prospective multicentre phase II study of Exatecan in adult soft tissue sarcomas failing 1 or 2 lines of chemotherapy in advanced phase, performed within the STBSG of EORTC. Thirty-nine patients (16 leiomyosarcomas and 23 other histologies) were included in two independent strata and received a total of 141 cycles (median 2). Median age was 61 years, range 25-76. Exatecan was given as i.v. infusion over 30 min at a dose of 0.5mg/m2 every day for five consecutive days, repeated every 21 days. Seventy-four percentage of cycles could be given without dose or schedule modification. The main toxicity was haematotoxicity with grade 3/4 neutropenia in 49%, grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia in 23%, and grade 3/4 anaemia in 15% of patients, respectively. Non-haematological toxicity consisted mainly of grade 2/3 dyspnoea in 36% of patients and grade 2/3 fatigue in 28%. One treatment-related toxic death due to septic shock was reported. Best overall response was no change with 60% in the leiomyosarcoma group and 53% in the non-leiomysarcoma group, respectively. The 3 months progression-free survival estimates are 56% for leiomysarcomas and 26% for other histologies, respectively. Using a two-step statistical design, the trial was stopped after the first step in both strata, due to lack of activity. In pretreated soft tissue sarcoma patients, Exatecan is well tolerated but does not achieve any objective responses. However, with respect to progression-free survival, Exatecan did show some activity in leiomyosarcomas.     

Brostallicin versus doxorubicin as first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced or metastatic soft tissue sarcoma: An European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group randomised phase II and pharmacogenetic study

AimBrostallicin is a DNA minor groove binder that has shown activity in patients with soft tissue sarcoma (STS) failing first-line therapy. The present study assessed the safety and efficacy of first-line brostallicin in patients with advanced or metastatic STS > 60 years or not fit enough to receive combination chemotherapy. A prospective explorative pharmacogenetic analysis was undertaken in parallel.MethodsPatients were randomised in a 2:1 ratio between IV brostallicin 10 mg/m² and doxorubicin 75 mg/m² once every 3 weeks for a maximum of six cycles. Disease stabilisation at 26 weeks (primary end-point) was considered a ‘success’. Further testing of brostallicin was warranted if ⩾35 ‘successes’ were observed in the first 72 eligible patients treated with brostallicin. In addition, patients were genotyped for glutathione S transferase (GST) polymorphisms.ResultsOne hundred and eighteen patients were included (79 brostallicin and 39 doxorubicin). Brostallicin was well tolerated in comparison to doxorubicin with less grade 3–4 neutropenia (67% versus 95%), grade 2–3 systolic dysfunction (0% versus 11%), alopecia (17% versus 61%) and grade 2–3 mucositis (0% versus 18%). For brostallicin versus doxorubicin, ‘successes’ were observed in 5/77 versus 10/36, progression free survival at 1 year was 6.5% versus 15.6%, objective response rate was 3.9% versus 22.2% and overall survival at 1 year was 50.5% versus 57.9%, respectively. Only GSTA1 genotype was significantly associated with success rate of doxorubicin treatment.ConclusionBrostallicin cannot be recommended at this dose and schedule in this patient population as first-line therapy. GSTA1 genotype may be predictive for doxorubicin efficacy but warrants further study.     

Effect of high-dose ifosfamide in advanced soft tissue sarcomas. A multicentre phase II study of the EORTC Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group

In this phase II study the effect of high-dose ifosfamide (HDI) given as a 3-day continuous infusion at a dose of 12 g/m2 repeated every 4 weeks with adequate mesna protection and hydration was evaluated in patients with advanced soft tissue sarcomas. A total of 124 patients entered the trial of which 10 were ineligible. HDI was given both as first-line and second-line chemotherapy. Median age was 46 years (19-66 years). Median World Health Organization (WHO) performance status was 1 (0-1). Fifty two per cent of the patients were males. The predominant histology was leiomyosarcoma (33%). A maximum of six cycles was given. At the time of analysis 55 patients have died. The partial response (PR) rate was 16%. The median time to progression was 15 weeks. 8 of the 18 responding patients (44%) had synovial sarcomas, whereas only 5% of the patients having leiomyosarcomas responded. The grade 3 + 4 haematological toxicity encountered was neutrophils in 78% and platelets in 12%. The major grade 3 + 4 non-haematological toxicities encountered were febrile neutropenia in 39%, infection in 20%, and acute renal failure in 4%. In conclusion, it is possible to administer HDI on a multicentre basis, but the toxicity is substantial. HDI given as a continuous infusion at this dose cannot be recommended as the standard treatment of advanced soft tissue sarcomas, even in selected patients.     

First-line chemotherapy for malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (MPNST) versus other histological soft tissue sarcoma subtypes and as a prognostic factor for MPNST: an EORTC Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group study

Background: The role of chemotherapy in advanced malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (MPNST) is unclear.Patients and methods: Chemotherapy-naive soft tissue sarcomas (STS) patients treated on 12 pooled nonrandomized and randomized European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group trials were retrospectively analyzed. Clinical outcomes, overall survival, progression-free survival (PFS) and response were determined for MPNST and other STS histotypes and compared. Additionally, prognostic factors within the MPNST population were defined. Studied cofactors were demographics, sarcoma history, disease extent and chemotherapy regimen.Results: After a median follow-up of 4.1 years, 175 MPNST out of 2675 eligible STS patients were analyzed. Outcome was similar for MPNST versus other STS histotypes, with a response rate, median PFS and overall survival of 21% versus 22%, 17 versus 16 weeks and 48 versus 51 weeks, respectively. Performance status was an independent prognostic factor for overall survival. Chemotherapy regimen was an independent prognostic factor for response (P < 0.0001) and PFS (P = 0.009). Compared with standard first-line doxorubicin, the doxorubicin–ifosfamide regimen had the best response, whereas ifosfamide had the worst prognosis.Conclusion: This series indicates the role of chemotherapy in treatment of advanced MPNST. This first comparison showed similar outcomes for MPNST and other STS histotypes. The apparent superiority of the doxorubicin–ifosfamide regimen justifies further investigations of this combination in randomized trials.     

European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group Experience with Advanced/Metastatic Epithelioid Sarcoma Patients Treated in Prospective Trials: Clinical Profile and Response to Systemic Therapy

Aims

Epithelioid sarcoma is a soft tissue sarcoma associated with a high rate of local recurrence after wide resection and high incidence of distant metastasis. Little is known about the clinical course and response to systemic treatments in epithelioid sarcoma patients. We carried out a retrospective analysis of clinical data from epithelioid sarcoma patients to provide a reference for the design of future epithelioid sarcoma-specific studies.

Outcome of chemotherapy in advanced synovial sarcoma patients: Review of 15 clinical trials from the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group; setting a new landmark for studies in this entity

IntroductionPrevious studies in metastatic soft tissue sarcomas (STS) showed that synovial sarcomas tend to have better survival rates and a higher chemosensitivity than other STS subtypes. However, data are derived from relatively small subgroups and statistical significance of these observations is lacking. Larger cohorts are necessary to define and confirm the specific characteristics of this subtype.Patients and methodsPatient data were retrieved from 15 European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer advanced first-line STS trials. Patient characteristics, survival and treatment response of synovial sarcoma patients were compared to other STS patients. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed to evaluate prognostic factors.ResultsIn total, 3330 advanced STS patients were retrieved, of whom 313 had a synovial sarcoma. Synovial sarcoma patients were significantly younger (median 40 versus 52 years), more often had extremity primary tumours and had a better performance status (PS 0: 50.2 versus 43.4%) compared to other STS patients. Additionally, synovial sarcoma patients had a significantly better response to chemotherapy (responders: 27.8 versus 18.8%) and better survival rates (progression free survival [PFS]: 6.3 versus 3.7 months; Overall survival [OS]: 15.0 versus 11.7 months). Age, PS, and presence of metastatic disease were defined as prognostic factors for PFS and OS in the univariable analysis. The last two factors were confirmed in the multivariable analysis for OS.DiscussionAdvanced synovial sarcomas are a distinct subgroup of STS, with a better response to systemic chemotherapy and longer PFS and OS. These results should be taken into account in the design of future synovial sarcoma specific studies.     

Epirubicin is not Superior to Doxorubicin in the Treatment of Advanced Soft Tissue Sarcomas.The Experience of the EORTC Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group

Purpose. Doxorubicin (dox) still appears to be one of the most active drugs in the treatment of soft tissue sarcomas. However, treatment duration is limited due to cumulative cardiotoxicity. A number of small studies from single institutions have suggested activity of other analogues. In two studies the EORTC STBSG tested whether epirubicin (epi) is an alternative to standard dose dox in the treatment of chemonaive patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma. The present report gives the final results of these studies.Patients/Methods. In the first study 210 patients were randomized to receive either dox or epi both at a dose of 75 mg/m(2) given as bolus injection at 3-week intervals. In the second study 334 patients were randomized to dox 75 mg/m(2), epi 150 mg/m(2) or epi 50 mg/m(2) days 1-3, all given as bolus injection at 3-week intervals.Results. In the first study no differences in median survival and duration of response were found. Of 167 evaluable patients the response rate was slightly in favour of dox (23% vs 18%) but at the expense of more toxicity.These data could suggest that increasing the epi dose may lead to a greater antineoplastic effect with acceptable toxicity. In the second study 15% of 314 evaluable patients had an objective tumour response. There were no differences between the three groups with regard to response rate, progression-free and overall survival, but both dose schedules of epi were more myelotoxic than dox.Conclusion. Regardless of schedule and dose, epi is not superior to dox in the treatment of patients with advanced soft tissue sarcomas. In addition, the results illustrate that the data from small studies of single institutions should always be confirmed by large multi-institutional studies before being taken for granted.     

Sarcoma classification: An update based on the 2013 World Health Organization Classification of Tumors of Soft Tissue and Bone

The 2013 World Health Organization Classification of Tumors of Soft Tissue and Bone incorporates changes in tumor classification, as well as new genetic insights into the pathogenesis of many different tumor types that have emerged over the 11 years since the publication of the prior volume. This article reviews changes in the classification of soft tissue and bone sarcomas as well as tumors of intermediate biologic potential in the 2013 World Health Organization volume, new molecular insights into these tumors, and associated surgical and clinical implications. Cancer 2014;120:1763–1774 . © 2014 American Cancer Society.     

Significant clinical benefit of first-line palliative chemotherapy in advanced soft-tissue sarcoma: retrospective analysis and identification of prognostic factors in 488 patients

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of palliative chemotherapy was investigated in a large group of patients with advanced soft-tissue sarcomas (STS) treated on routine palliative protocols. METHODS: Patients with STS who had first-line chemotherapy for advanced and/or metastatic disease between 1991 and 2005 were identified from the Royal Marsden Hospital's sarcoma database. Patients with Ewing sarcoma, rhabdomyosarcoma, desmoplastic small round cell tumor, and gastrointestinal stromal tumors were excluded from the study. RESULTS: In all, 488 patients (242 male, 246 female) fulfilled the study criteria. The median age was 49 years and the majority (83%) received chemotherapy for metastatic disease. The most common histologic subtypes were leiomyosarcoma (35%) synovial sarcoma (13%), liposarcoma (10%), and malignant fibrous histiocytoma (10%). In all, 61% received single-agent chemotherapy, usually doxorubicin. An objective response was reported in 33% of patients (53% in those with synovial sarcoma); 22% had stable disease and 45% derived 'clinical benefit' (objective responses + stable disease for >or= 6 months). Median duration of response was 9 months and median posttreatment overall survival (OS) was 12 months. In multivariate analysis, age <40 years, liposarcoma, and synovial histology were found to be positive, and bone involvement to be negative, independent prognostic factors. Patients treated with combination chemotherapy experienced longer OS than those treated with a single agent. CONCLUSIONS: Palliative chemotherapy may be beneficial in approximately half of patients with advanced STS. Synovial sarcoma and liposarcoma subtypes have a better prognosis. However, the overall poor outcome of these patients indicates the need to continue the search for more effective agents.