微创锁定接骨板治疗肱骨近端骨折

肱骨近端骨折是一种常见的骨折，国内报道占全身骨折的2．5％。手术治疗的指征取决于患者的全身和局部的伴随损伤．骨折的类型和稳定程度，患者的年龄和全身状况以及骨骼质量。笔者于2004年6月至2007年6月．采用AO锁定肱骨近端接骨板治疗54例肱骨近端骨折，取得满意疗效。现报告如下。     

锁定接骨板治疗肱骨近端复杂骨折

目的探讨肱骨近端锁定接骨板（LPHP）治疗肱骨近端复杂骨折的临床疗效。方法回顾分析本院2003年1月至2005年10月采取LPHP治疗31例肱骨近端复杂骨折。按Neer分型，3部分骨折22例；4部分骨折9例。结果31例经5～13月随访．无1例发生内固定松动、断裂，全部骨折均愈合。肩关节功能按照Constant评分标准，功能优9例，良18例，中4例，优良率87．1％。结论LPHP治疗肱骨近端复杂骨折固定可靠、骨折愈合率高、可行早期功能锻炼，功能恢复好。     

锁定接骨板治疗肱骨近端骨折

目的探讨肱骨近端锁定接骨板治疗肱骨近端骨折的临床疗效。方法59例肱骨近端骨折,其中男32例,女27例患者平均年龄50.5岁(22～82岁)。按Neer分类法,二部分骨折23例;三部分骨折24例;四部分骨折12例。结果X线片观察骨折愈合时间7.4周(6～12周)。按照Constant评分标准,功能优34例,良19例,中6例,优良率为89.8%。结论肱骨近端锁定接骨板治疗肱骨近端骨折手术简单、微创、固定可靠、并发症少、骨折愈合率高,别是老年骨质疏松患者首选治疗方法。     

锁定接骨板治疗肱骨近端骨折

<正>2010年2月~2013年10月,我科采用肱骨近端锁定接骨板治疗肱骨近端骨折38例,疗效显著,报道如下。1材料与方法1.1病例资料本组38例,男16例,女22例,年龄48~88岁。均为闭合骨折。依据Neer分型:两部分骨折9例,三部分骨折17例,四部分骨折12例。     

锁定肱骨近端接骨板治疗肱骨近端骨折

目的探讨锁定肱骨近端接骨板治疗肱骨近端骨折的临床价值：方法采用切开复位AO锁定肱骨近端接骨板(LPHP)内固定治疗肱骨近端骨折12例。结果所有患随访3～13个月，平均7．5个月。临床疗效评估：优7例，良3例，进步2例，优良率为83．3％。结论LPHP具有固定可靠、减少软组织损伤、保护血运、利于关节囊和肩袖修复、有助于骨折愈合和肩关节功能恢复的特点，值得提倡。     

加长型肱骨近端锁定接骨板内固定治疗老年肱骨干合并肱骨近端骨折

目的探讨加长型肱骨近端锁定接骨板(PHILOS)内固定治疗老年肱骨干合并肱骨近端骨折的临床疗效。方法回顾性分析自2012-05—2016-01采用加长型PHILOS钢板内固定治疗的13例老年肱骨干合并肱骨近端骨折,根据骨折线长度选用钢板,于骨折近端置入合适长度的锁定螺钉,避免螺钉穿透肱骨头进入关节腔,肱骨干远折端置入至少3枚锁定螺钉,亦可与皮质骨螺钉混合使用,远近骨折线之间根据跨度置入2或3枚锁定螺钉。结果 13例均获得随访,随访时间平均15.6(12~24)个月。切口未出现感染,均一期愈合。13例均获得骨性愈合,骨折愈合时间平均20(15~36)周。随访期间未发生肱骨头坏死、螺钉松动、螺钉拔出及钢板断裂,1例合并桡神经损伤者3个月后神经功能自行恢复。末次随访时采用Neer评分评价肩关节功能:优9例,良3例,可1例。结论加长型PHILOS钢板可有效固定老年肱骨干合并肱骨近端骨折,骨折复位维持良好,术后患者肩关节功能恢复良好。     

微创技术置入PHILOS钢板治疗肱骨干近端骨折

目的评价微创接骨板固定(MIPO)技术置入PHILOS(proximal humeral internal locking system)治疗肱骨干近端骨折的临床效果。方法自2008年11月~2009年8月,采用MIPO技术置入PHILOS钢板治疗23例肱骨干近端移位骨折。结果本组获随访6～17个月,平均11.3个月。X线片示22例于术后6个月内骨折达骨性愈合;1例因内固定松动发生延迟愈合,但无临床症状,于术后9个月骨折愈合,功能恢复至可。术后半年1例发生肩关节撞击征,取出内固定行功能锻炼后功能恢复至可。采用Constant-Murley评分方法评定疗效:优11例,良10例,可2例,优良率91.3%。结论采用MIPO技术置入PHILOS钢板治疗肱骨近端骨折是一种良好的方法,减少骨不连发生率,有利于肩关节早期功能恢复。     

锁定接骨板治疗老年肱骨近端复杂骨折

目的探讨肱骨近端锁定接骨板治疗老年肱骨近端复杂骨折的临床疗效。方法采用肱骨近端锁定接骨板治疗27例肱骨近端骨折。根据Neer分类,三部分骨折22例,四部分骨折5例,所有病例均应用肱骨近端锁定接骨板治疗,术后严格功能锻炼。结果本组病例骨折平均愈合时间7．1周（6-12周）。根据Constant评分标准评定平均分为88．2分,其中功能优17例,良8例,中2例,优良率为92．6％。结论肱骨近端锁定接骨板治疗老年骨质疏松患者肱骨近端骨折具有固定可靠、并发症少、手术简单、骨折愈合快等优点。     

锁定接骨板治疗老年肱骨近端骨折

目的 探讨肱骨近端锁定接骨板(LPHP)治疗肱骨近端骨折的临床疗效。方法 采PHP治疗29例肱骨近端骨折，按Neer分类法，二部分骨折11例；三部分骨折12例；四部分骨折6例。结果 平均愈合时间7．4周(6～12周)：按照Constant评分标准，功能优18例，良为8例，中为3例，优良率为89．6％。结论 肱骨近端锁定接骨板治疗眩骨近端骨折手术简单、固定可靠、并发症少、骨折愈合率高特别是老年骨质疏松患者首选治疗方法。     

锁定接骨板治疗老年肱骨近端复杂骨折

目的探讨肱骨近端锁定接骨板(LPHP)治疗老年肱骨近端复杂骨折的临床疗效。方法采用LPHP内固定治疗19例老年肱骨近端复杂骨折。按Neer分型,三部分骨折11例;四部分8例。结果19例经9～39个月随访,无一例发生内固定松动、断裂,全部骨折均愈合。肩关节功能按照Constant评分标准,优9例,良8例,中2例,优良率89.5%。结论LPHP内固定治疗肱骨近端复杂骨折,固定可靠、骨折愈合率高,可行早期功能锻炼,功能恢复好,尤其适用于老年骨质疏松患者。     

Minimally Invasive Anterior Plate Osteosynthesis in Humeral Shaft Fractures

Abstract   Twelve patients with shaft fractures of the humerus were treated with percutaneous anterior plate osteosynthesis using a deltoid-pectoral respectively brachialis splitting approach without exposure of the radial nerve. The implants used were PHILOS plates, locking compression plates 3.5 and 4.5, and a tibial metaphyseal plate (all by Synthes). There were no intraoperative complications, no infections and no iatrogenic injuries of the radial or axillary nerve. Nine fractures healed entirely. There was one pseudarthrosis caused by a plate that was too short; another fracture probably healed but the distal screws broke; and one patient was lost to follow-up. Minimally invasive anterior plate osteosynthesis in humeral shaft fractures is an operative alternative which may be indicated not only in delayed healing or complex shaft fractures.     

Minimally Invasive Plating Osteosynthesis in the Treatment of Humeral Shaft Fractures: A Meta-Analysis

Background: Whether minimally invasive plating osteosynthesis (MIPO) or other operative interventions is superior in the treatment of humeral shaft fractures remains controversial. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to quantitatively compare the clinical outcomes of MIPO and other operative interventions in the treatment of humeral shaft fractures. Methods: Pubmed, Embase, and Web of Science were systematically searched to identify all available studies comparing clinical outcomes between patients receiving MIPO and other operative interventions. The weight mean difference (WMD) was pooled to compare the operative time, union time, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) score, and Mayo elbow performance index (MEPI).The risk ratio (RR) was pooled to compare the union rate, and incidence of complications. Pooled estimates were calculated by using a fixed-effects model or a randomized-effects model, according to the heterogeneity among studies. Results: Nine studies were included in this meta-analysis. Our results suggest that both MIPO and other operative interventions can achieve similar union time, UCLA score, MEPI, and union rate. However, MIPO is associated with better outcomes including shorter operation time, and lower incidence of radial nerve injury. Conclusion: Evidence from this meta-analysis demonstrated that, MIPO is effective but safer than other operative interventions in the treatment of humeral shaft fracture. However, due to the potential limitations in this meta-analysis, randomized controlled trials with larger sample sizes using appropriate blinding methods are needed to confirm these findings.     

微创经皮接骨板技术治疗胫骨骨折

目的：经皮微创内固定（minimally invasive percutaneou plate osteosynthesis,MIPPO）结合普通国产DCP钢板治疗胫骨干骨折31例的临床疗效,并探讨胫骨干骺端骨折27例的经皮接骨板技术的临床疗效。方法：回顾性分析了2002年7月-2004年7月收治的85例胫骨干骨折临床治疗的随访结果,并前瞻性研究2004年7月。2005年1月胫骨干骺端骨折54例的经皮接骨板技术的临床疗效。胫骨干骨折85例随访82例,随访时间1．5-4年,平均随访2年。胫骨干骺端骨折全部随访10月。2．5年,平均1．5年。结果：胫骨干82例均愈合,术后疼痛轻,无感染,无延迟愈合及骨不连的病例,胫骨干骺端骨折治疗54例伤口无感染,骨折均愈合,功能恢复良好。结论：对于胫骨干骨折,经皮微创固定结合普通国产DCP钢板与带锁髓内钉具有相似的结果。对于胫骨干骺端骨折,经皮微创内固定结合普通国产解剖钢板具有创伤小,局部组织干扰较小,骨折愈合快,功能恢复好的特点。     

微创经皮钢板骨桥接术联合锁定加压钛板治疗胫骨远端骨折

目的探讨微创经皮钢板骨桥接术（minimallyi nvasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis，MIPPO）联合锁定加压钛板（locking compression plate，LCP）治疗胫骨远端骨折的近期疗效。方法2004年6月～2006年3月采用MIPPO联合LCP治疗胫骨远端骨折16例，AO分型：43A1型7例，43A3型5例，43B1型2例，43C3型2例。采用3种方法复位胫骨骨折后插入LCP，用锁定螺钉固定。结果16例随访5～20个月，平均11，5月。16例切口一期愈合，骨折无延迟愈合、畸形愈合、断钉、断板等并发症。术后X线检查4～12周（平均7．6周）骨痂形成并开始部分负重，8～20周骨性愈合（平均16周），此时开始完全负重。3例出现胫骨远端内植物局部不适。根据美国足踝骨科学会评分系统对踝关节功能评分，优14例（87．5％），良2例（12，5％）。结论MIPPO具有创伤小、固定牢靠、可早期功能锻炼等优点，近期疗效满意，是治疗胫骨远端骨折的有效方法。     

微创经皮钢板接骨术治疗肱骨近端骨折

目的探讨微创经皮钢板接骨术(minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis,MIPPO)在肱骨近端骨折的临床应用及疗效。方法回顾性分析我科从2010年5月至2012年2月运用MIPPO技术结合锁定钢板治疗的19例肱骨近端骨折患者,根据NEER分类,属二部分骨折5例,属三部分骨折11例,属四部分骨折3例。围手术期预防性使用抗生素,术后肩关节功能采用Neer评分标准评估。结果本组患者均获随访,随访时间6~12个月,平均8个月。随访的患者均无骨折不愈合、延迟愈合、伤口感染及内固定失败等并发症。术后肩关节功能恢复依据Neer评分标准,优10例,良7例,可2例,总优良率为89.4%。结论采用MIPPO技术治疗肱骨近端骨折具有创伤小、术中术后出血少、伤口美观、固定牢固、骨折愈合率高以及能够早期功能锻炼的优点,值得在治疗肱骨近端骨折中应用推广,但对于粉碎性骨折尚有局限性。     

微创锁定接骨板技术治疗股骨转子间骨折的临床研究

目的评价通过微创接骨板技术以锁定加压接骨板内固定治疗股骨转子间骨折的疗效。方法从2007年10月至2009年10月,通过微创接骨板技术以锁定加压接骨板内固定治疗35例股骨转子间骨折。男性22例,女性13例,年龄17～84岁,平均51岁。按AO/OTA分类,A1 9例,A2 19例,A3 7例。无开放性骨折。以临床功能和X线检查评定治疗效果。结果 35例均获随访,平均随访时间13个月（4～28个月）。35例骨折全部愈合,平均愈合时间为13周（9～16周）,没有发生内固定失败以及骨不愈合者。发生浅表感染1例。髋关节功能评价（Harris）优良31例,优良率88.5%。结论微创锁定接骨板技术操作简单,创伤小,效果好,是治疗股骨转子间骨折的一种有效方法。     

微创经皮钢板接骨术治疗胫骨骨折

目的 评价经皮微创钢板接骨术治疗胫骨骨折的临床疗效。方法 运用此技术治疗胫骨骨折54例。于胫骨内侧建立皮下隧道,经此隧道将钢板穿置在胫骨内侧骨膜上,骨折间接复位,低密度螺钉予以固定。结果 全部病例获随访,时间12～26个月,平均18个月,骨折愈合时间10～16周,平均12周,无骨折延迟愈合及不愈合,无感染及内固定失败等并发症。结论 微创经皮钢板接骨术符合生物学固定原则,有利于骨折的愈合。     

Minimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis for Open Fractures of the Proximal Tibia

Background

Relatively few studies have addressed plate osteosynthesis for open proximal tibial fractures by now. The purpose of this study was to assess the results of minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) for open fractures of the proximal tibia.

Methods

Thirty-four patients with an open proximal tibial fracture were treated by MIPO. Thirty of these, who followed for over 1 year, constituted the subject of this retrospective study. According to the AO Foundation and Orthopaedic Trauma Association (AO-OTA) classification, there were 3 patients of type 41-C, 6 of type 42-A, 8 of type 42-B, and 13 of type 42-C. In terms of the Gustilo and Anderson''s open fracture grading system, 11 patients were of grade I, 6 were of grade II, and 13 were of grade III (III-A, 6; III-B, 6; III-C, 1). After thorough debridement and wound cleansing, when necessary, a soft tissue flap was placed. Primary MIPO (simultaneous plate fixation with soft tissue procedures) was performed in 18 patients, and staged MIPO (temporary external fixation followed by soft tissue procedures and subsequent conversion to plate fixation after soft tissue healing) was performed in 12 patients. Results were assessed according to the achievement and time to union, complications (including infections), and function of the knee joint using Knee Society scores. Statistical analysis was performed to identify factors influencing results.

Results

Primary union was achieved by 24 of the 30 study subjects. Early bone grafting was performed in 6 cases with a massive initial bone defect expected to result in non-union. No patient had malalignment greater than 10°. The mean Knee Society score was 88.7 at final follow-up visits, 23 patients achieved an excellent result, and 7 a good result. There were 3 superficial and 5 deep infections, but none required early implant removal. Functional results were similar for primary and staged MIPO (p = 0.113). Fracture pattern (p = 0.089) and open fracture grade (p = 0.079) were not found to influence the results.

Conclusions

If soft tissue coverage is adequately performed, MIPO could be regarded as an acceptable method for the treatment of open proximal tibial fracture.     

双窄钢板代单宽钢板在肱骨干骨折中的应用

目的探讨双窄钢板在肱骨干骨折治疗中的可行性。方法 2002年2月～2008年1月收治成人肱骨干骨折56例,使用单宽钢板固定35例,双窄钢板固定21例。临床评价指标:影像学骨折愈合时间,内固定失效或骨折不愈合率,医源性桡神经损伤率,感染率及术后临床上肢评分。结果术后随访时间12～36个月,平均25.6个月,两组均无感染发生。影像学骨折愈合时间单宽钢板组平均4.3个月,双窄钢板组3.7个月。内固定失效、骨折不愈合率单宽钢板组11.43%(4/35),双窄钢板组无一例出现内固定失效、骨折不愈合。医源性桡神经损伤率单宽钢板组8.57%(3/35),双窄钢板组9.52%(2/21)。术后临床上肢评分,单宽钢板组:优22例,良6例,可4例,差3例(优良率80.0%);双窄钢板组:优14例,良5例,可2例(优良率90.5%)。以上结果两组间差异均无统计学意义。结论对于肱骨干骨折单宽钢板固定或双窄钢板固定均是较好的内固定方式,但双窄钢板法在注意了相关操作技术的情况下可以获得更好的愈合率与低失效率,是值得推荐的手术方法之一。