Clinical outcomes comparing arthroscopic vs open ankle arthrodesis

BackgroundOver the last twenty years, minimally invasive ankle arthrodesis has evolved into a well-tolerated and safe procedure. It has grown in favor to open ankle arthrodesis due to shorter length of stay and fewer complications recorded. This paper aims to compare the clinical outcomes of arthroscopic vs open ankle arthrodesis at 24-months followup.MethodsFrom 2004 to 2015, we reviewed a prospectively collected database in a tertiary hospital foot and ankle registry. 28 feet that underwent arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis were matched to 56 feet that underwent open ankle arthrodesis for age, sex and body mass index (BMI). Visual analogue scale (VAS) scores, American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) Ankle-hindfoot Scores and Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) were obtained to assess clinical outcomes. These parameters were collected before surgery, at 6 months and 24 months after surgery.ResultsThe arthroscopic group demonstrated significant less pain in the perioperative period (arthroscopic: 1.9 ± 1.2, open: 3.8 ± 1.1, p < 0.001) and shorter length of hospitalization stay (arthroscopic: 2.1 ± 0.7 open: 3.5 ± 1.7, p < 0.001). Patients who underwent arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis also reported a higher SF-36 score on physical functioning at 6 months (arthroscopic: 58.4 ± 27.1, open: 47.1 ± 24.0, p < 0.05) and higher AOFAS Ankle-hindfoot Scale score at 24-months (arthroscopic: 78.9 ± 18.9, open: 68.9 ± 24.7, p < 0.05). There were no postoperative complications in the arthroscopic group but 11 in the open group, including 9 which required followup operations. There was no significant difference in length of operative procedure between both groups.ConclusionsWe conclude that the arthroscopic group displayed better clinical outcomes compared to the open group at the 24 months followup. The advantages of arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis include significantly less perioperative pain, higher AOFAS Ankle-hindfoot scores at 24 months, shorter length of stay, fewer postoperative complications and followup operations.Level of evidenceLevel III, retrospective comparative series.     

Radiological evaluation of ankle arthrodesis with Ilizarov fixation compared to internal fixation

IntroductionWe asked whether the type of ankle joint arthrodesis stabilization will affect: (1) rate of union, (2) rate of adjacted-joint arthritis, (3) malalignment of the ankle joint.Material and methodsWe retrospectively radiological studied 62 patients who underwent ankle arthrodesis with Ilizarov external fixator stabilization (group 1,n = 29) or internal stabilization (group 2,n = 33) from 2006 to 2015. Radiologic outcomes were mesure by: (1) rate of union, (2) rate of adjacent-joint arthritis, (3) malalignment of the ankle joint. The Levene’s test,Mann–Whitney U test and Students t-test were used to the statistical analyses.ResultsAnkle fusion was achieved in 100% of patients treated with external fixation and in 88% with internal stabilization. Desired frontal plane alignment was achieved in 100% of patients with external fixation and 76% with internal stabilization. Desired sagittal plane alignment was achieved in 100% of external fixation and 85% of internal stabilization. A total of 14 (48.3%) patients from group 1 showed a radiographic evidence of pre-existing adjacent-joint OA. The radiographic evidence of pre-existing adjacent-joint OA was also found in 27(81.8%) subjects from group 2. Alterations of adjacent joints were also found on postoperative radiograms of 19 (65.5%) patients subjected to Ilizarov fixation and in all 33 patients from group 2.DiscusionIlizarov fixation of ankle arthrodesis is associated with lower prevalence of adjacent-joint OA and ankle joint misalignment,and with higher fusion rates than after internal fixation.Although achieving a complex ankle fusion is generally challenging,radiological outcomes after fixation with the Ilizarov apparatus are better than after internal stabilization.     

External versus internal fixation for arthrodesis of chronic ankle joint infections — A comparative retrospective study

BackgroundArthrodesis of the ankle is a salvage procedure in case of chronic ankle joint infection. External fixation still is the gold standard.We compared the outcome of external fixator versus intramedullary nailing for arthrodesis of the infected ankle joint.MethodsAll patients with ankle joint infection who received arthrodesis with either external fixator or intramedullary nail between 08/2009 and 09/2017 were retrospectively analyzed. Endpoints were the successful control of infection, osseous fusion, and mobilization with full weightbearing.ResultsSeventy-one patients were included. Nineteen patients (27%) suffered reinfection. Patients with intramedullary nailing showed significantly fewer reinfections (p = 0.019), achieved full weightbearing significantly more often (p = 0.042) and faster and developed significantly fewer complications (p < 0.001). Forty-three patients showed bone fusion without significant differences between the groups.ConclusionsAnkle arthrodesis with intramedullary nailing appears to be a successful alternative to the established procedure of external fixation in cases of chronic ankle joint infection.     

Prognostic risk factors for complications associated with tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis with a nail

BackgroundTibiotalocalcaneal (TTC) arthrodesis with a nail can be an effective salvage procedure for several foot and ankle pathologies, but has a relatively high complication rate. The purpose of this study is to investigate risk factors associated with complications after TTC arthrodesis with a nail.MethodsClinical and radiographic outcomes for 82 patients from 2012 to 2016 who underwent TTC arthrodesis with a nail were retrospectivelyevaluated to determine if patient or surgeon specific variables offered prognostic value in predicting negative outcomes.ResultsDiabetes, diabetic neuropathy, high (>2) American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification, and Charcot neuroarthropathy all were predictive of developing a nonunion in either the subtalar ortibiotalar joints (p < 0.05). Diabetic neuropathy was predictive ofreoperation, and along with HbA1C >7.5 was also predictive of hardwarefailure. The odds ratio (OR) for diabetic neuropathy was 2.99 (p < 0.05)for nonunion in the tibiotalar or subtalar joints, 3.46 (p < 0.05) for reoperation,and 4.11 (p < 0.05) for hardware failure. High ASAclassification had an odds ratio of 3.93 (p < 0.05) for nonunion in the tibiotalar or subtalar joints as well. Diabetes had an odds ratio of 2.57 (p < 0.05) for nonunion.ConclusionsPatients with diabetic neuropathy, Charcot neuroarthropathy, elevated HbA1C, and ASA classification >2 demonstrated a higher complication rate in patients undergoing TTC arthrodesis with a nail.     

Tibio-talo-calcaneal fusion after limb salvage procedures—A retrospective study

BackgroundThe treatment of limb threatening trauma on the distal tibia or hindfoot often results in posttraumatic osteoarthritis requiring tibiotalocalcaneal (TTC) arthrodesis. The purpose of this study was to present a case series of patients undergoing various techniques of joint fusion after bone reconstruction and deformity correction as a salvage procedure. The study should help trauma surgeons making decisions in limb salvage and deformity correction in complex lower leg and foot injuries by presenting options and treatment strategies.Patients and methodsEight patients (4 male, 4 female) after TTC arthrodesis as a definitive procedure after polytrauma or monotrauma involving the distal tibia or hindfoot were the subject of this retrospective analysis. We included patients treated by external ring fixation (1 case), external fixation + wires (1 case), external fixation + screws (1 case) and intramedullary nailing (1 ante- and 5 retrograde; 1 bilateral, 4 unilateral). Initial trauma included open fractures, subtotal foot amputations and closed fractures with failed osteosynthesis and failed ankle joint replacement. Bone defects were treated with callus distraction or segment transport in 5 cases. Various angles were measured to assess foot deformities in the lateral radiographic view and clinical results were presented.ResultsIndependent, pain-free mobilisation with full weight bearing was achieved in all 8 patients. In terms of subjective outcome, all patients reported a highly satisfying result. Complete consolidation at the fusion site was achieved in 8 out of 9 cases with a high rate of adjacent joint arthritis. Angles measures in the lateral radiographs showed values typical for a pes cavus tendency.ConclusionTibio-talo-calcaneal (TTC) arthrodesis is a viable treatment option for severe post traumatic arthritis and deformity of the ankle and subtalar joint. Despite bad bone quality retrograde intramedullary nailing does provide acceptable results providing stability, low invasiveness and low infection rate. Simultaneous TTC-fusion and tibial lengthening using the Ilizarov ring fixator may be necessary when the surgeon is confronted with large bone defects – often followed by a nailing after lengthening procedure. This study shows that limb preservation after limb threatening trauma with hindfoot injury and multiple fractures of the lower extremity is recommenced as the method of choice with reasonable clinical results.Level of Evidence: IV, Case series     

Primary stability and stiffness in ankle arthrodes—Crossed screws versus anterior plating

BackgroundAnkle arthrodesis is commonly used for the treatment of osteoarthritis or failed arthroplasty. Screw fixation is the predominant technique to perform ankle arthrodesis. Due to a considerable frequency of failures research suggests the use of an anatomically shaped anterior double plate system as a reliable method for isolated tibiotalar arthrodesis. The purpose of the present biomechanical study was to compare two groups of ankle fusion constructs – three screw fixation and an anterior double plate system – in terms of primary stability and stiffness.MethodsSix matched-pairs human cadaveric lower legs (Thiel fixated) were used in this study. One specimen from each pair was randomly assigned to be stabilized with the anterior double plate system and the other with the three-screw technique. The different arthrodesis methods were tested by dorsiflexing the foot until failure of the system, defined as rotation of the talus relative to the tibia in the sagittal plane. Experiments were performed on a universal materials testing machine. The force required to make arthrodesis fail was documented. For calculation of the stiffness, a linear regression was fitted to the force–displacement curve in the linear portion of the curve and its slope taken as the stiffness.ResultsFor the anatomically shaped double-plate system a mean load of 967 N was needed (range from 570 N to 1400 N) to make arthrodesis fail. The three-screw fixation method resisted a mean load of 190 N (range from 100 N to 280 N) (p = 0.005). In terms of stiffness a mean of 56 N/mm (range from 35 N/mm to 79 N/mm) was achieved for the anatomically shaped double-plate system whereas a mean of 10 N/mm (range from 6 N/mm to 18 N/mm) was achieved for the three-screw fixation method (p = 0.004).ConclusionsOur biomechanical data demonstrates that the anterior double-plate system is significantly superior to the three-screw fixation technique for ankle arthrodesis in terms of primary stability and stiffness.     

Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis with distal tibial allograft for massive bone deficits in the ankle

BackgroundThe purpose of this study was to assess the outcomes of distal tibial structural allograft to obtain a stable TTC fusion.MethodsRetrospectively, ten patients were carried out with a minimum one year follow-up. The median age was 72 (33–81). The median BMI was 28 (24–33). Indications for TTC arthrodesis included failed total ankle arthroplasty (n = 7 patients), prior nonunion (n = 2 patients), and a trauma injury.ResultsUnion rate was 80%. The median initial height of the distal tibial allograft was 19 mm (14–24 mm). In seven cases the allograft did not lose height. The AOFAS score median was 69 (31–84). SF-12 median physical component was 39 (30–53), and 59 (23–62) for mental component. The VAS median was 2 (0–8).ConclusionsTTC using distal tibial allograft shows a lower rate of collapse than other structural grafts and provides a fusion rate higher or in accordance with the literature.Level of evidenceLevel IV, retrospective case series.     

Use of the Versa nail and anterior ankle arthrotomy to achieve primary tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis in rheumatoid arthritis

BackgroundSurgical treatment of rheumatoid ankle can be challenging. Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis is one such treatment and has been performed using various methods and tools including different types of nails.ObjectiveTo evaluate the clinical outcome of primary tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis in rheumatoid arthritis using anterior ankle arthrotomy and Versa nail, an intramedullary nail designed specifically for tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis.MethodsReview of case records, radiographs and telephonic interview of 11 rheumatoid patients who had undergone primary tibiotalocalcaneal fusion using the Versa nail between March 2004 and May 2005.ResultsArthrodesis was achieved in nine cases. Complications seen in four patients included a non-union, fractured tibia, ulceration and cellulitis. All complications resolved with conservative treatment and none affected the long-term outcome. There was a highly significant improvement in the modified AOFAS score from 18 before surgery to 72 afterwards [p < .0001].ConclusionTibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis using Versa nail and anterior approach is an effective procedure in rheumatoid arthritis. Anterior approach preserves the malleoli and therefore rotational stability, making it possible to avoid the use of proximal screws. Our study suggests that, in the presence of very osteopenic bone and atrophic skin, it is safe to avoid using screws and to allow weight bearing without compromising the final outcome.     

Combined subtalar distraction arthrodesis with peroneus brevis tenotomy for posttraumatic subtalar arthritis

BackgroundSubtalar distraction arthrodesis is advocated as a salvage procedure for isolated posttraumatic subtalar arthritis. This study aimed at evaluating combined subtalar distraction arthrodesis with peroneus brevis tenotomy for such cases.MethodsTwenty patients with isolated posttraumatic subtalar arthritis managed by combined subtalar distraction arthrodesis and peroneus brevis tenotomy were reviewed for a retrospective study. The American orthopaedic foot and ankle society [AOFAS] hindfoot scoring, talocalcaneal height [TCH], talocalcaneal angle [TCA] and heel valgus angle [HVA] were used for both pre and postoperative assessments.ResultsThe mean postoperative [TCH] [70.3 ± 1.9 mm] was statistically better than the preoperative value [64.7 ± 2.2 mm] [p < 0.001]. There was a statistically significant decrease in [HVA] [p < 0.001]. On the contrary, there was a statistically significant increase in both [AOFAS] hindfoot scoring and the [TCA] [p < 0.001].ConclusionsApplying this technique for isolated posttraumatic subtalar arthritis with peroneal tendinitis improved both lateral retromalleolar swelling and deformity correction.     

Bipolar fresh total osteochondral allograft in the ankle: Is it a successful long-term solution?

IntroductionSevere post-traumatic ankle arthritis poses a reconstructive challenge in young and active patients. Although technically demanding and despite unsolved immunological issues, bipolar fresh total osteochondral allograft (BFTOA) represent an intriguing option to arthrodesis and prosthetic replacement. The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the outcomes of a series of 48 ankle BFTOA at 10 years follow up and to investigate the rate of survival long term.Methods58 patients underwent BFTOA, of these 48 were available for follow up. The allograft was prepared with the help of specifically designed jigs and the surgery was performed using either a lateral or a direct anterior approach. Patients were evaluated clinically and radiographically preoperatively, and at a mean 121 ± 18 months of follow-up.ResultsThe AOFAS score improved from 31 ± 11 pre operatively, to 65 ± 25 at the last (p < 0.0005). Fourteen failures occurred, with 70.8% allograft rate of survival. All the surviving allografts showed a reduction of the ankle joint movement, still associated with a satisfactory clinical result.ConclusionThe use of BFTOA represents an intriguing option to arthrodesis or arthroplasty. A satisfactory clinical result associated to a good movement of the transplanted joint is to be expected up to short-mid-term, overtime. Long term, the range of motion (ROM) is progressively decreased up to spontaneous arthrodesis in some cases, still the joint results pain free and patient’s perception is of a well functioning ankle. A deeper knowledge of the immunological behavior of transplanted cartilage is needed in order to improve the durability of this fascinating technique.     

Comparison of arthroscopic to open tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis in high-risk patients

BackgroundOpen tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis (TTCA) is associated to high complication rates, which led to the development of arthroscopic techniques. Aim was to compare complication rates of open to arthroscopic TTCA in high-risk patients.MethodsSingle-center, retrospective case-control study. Patients were selected from the authors’ TTCA database. Eligible were high-risk patients receiving arthroscopic-, or open TTCA retrospectively suitable for arthroscopic TTCA. Primary outcome were major complications.ResultsEight open and 15 arthroscopic TTCAs were included. Three open and 4 arthroscopic TTCAs presented preoperative plantar ulceration. Fusion rates were similar (75% vs. 67%; p = 0.679). Major complications occurred in 63% of open (80% surgical-site-infections (SSI)) and 33% of arthroscopic (100% non-unions) TTCA. Preoperative plantar ulceration did not affect major SSI in open TTCA (67% vs. 60%) but resulted in a significant increase of non-union rates for arthroscopic TTCA (75% vs. 18%; p = 0.039). In patients without plantar ulceration the union-rate was 80% for both, open and arthroscopic TTCA.ConclusionArthroscopic TTCA drastically reduced major SSI. Patients without preexisting ulceration had excellent union-rates for open and arthroscopic TTCA.     

Short-term and mid-term outcome of total ankle replacement in haemophilic patients

BackgroundAnkle arthropathy is very frequent in haemophilic patients. Prostheses are valuable alternatives to arthrodesis in non-haemophilic patients. We report the experience of a single centre in France on the use of prostheses in haemophilic patients.MethodsRetrospective study of 21 patients with haemarthropathy who underwent ankle arthroplasty (32 ankles), with additional surgery, if needed, from July 2002 to September 2009 (mean follow-up 4.4 ± 1.7 years). The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle–hindfoot scale was used to evaluate pain, function, ankle mobility and alignment.ResultsThe overall AOFAS score improved from 40.2 ± 19.4 (pre-surgery) to 85.3 ± 11.4 (post-surgery). The function score increased from 23.6 ± 7.7 to 35.9 ± 6.7 and dorsiflexion from 0.3° ± 5.0° to 10.3° ± 4.4°. Two patients underwent further ankle arthrodesis. On X-ray, both tibial and talar components were stable and correctly placed in all ankles. Alignment was good.ConclusionAnkle arthroplasty is a promising alternative to arthrodesis in haemophilic patients.     

Applications of the transfibular approach to the hindfoot: A systematic review and description of a preferred technique

BackgroundThe indications and technique for the transfibular approach to the tibiotalar joint have evolved since its initial popularization in 1942. The purpose of this systematic review is to assess the indications, techniques, and postoperative outcomes among procedures performed with the transfibular approach.MethodsA comprehensive search of PubMed, Medline, and Embase databases from 1942 to 2018 was performed in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. After an initial broad search of transfibular approach indications, articles were stratified into 4 major surgical categories for assessment: (1) tibiotalar arthrodesis (2) tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis (3) total ankle replacement and (4) distal tibial tumor excision. Data was analyzed according to these 4 categories.ResultsA total of 32 studies (874 ankles) were included. Fibular non-union rates were 0.7 % (5 of 672) across all studies, 0.6% (2 of 329) for tibiotalar arthrodesis, 0.0% (0 of 12) for tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis, 1.0 % (3 of 296) for total ankle arthroplasty and 0.0% (0 of 15) for other procedures. Rates of deep infection were 2.5% (23 of 903) across all studies, 3.2% (15 of 466) for tibiotalar arthrodesis, 3.7% (4 of 106) for tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis, 1.3% (4 of 296) for total ankle arthroplasty, and 0.0% (0 of 15) for other procedures.ConclusionsThe transfibular approach is useful for cases requiring extensile exposure of the tibiotalar joint. This study provides evidence that the transfibular approach yields satisfactory results, with low complication and infection rates.Level of evidenceIV     

Biomechanical comparison of stability of tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis with two different intramedullary retrograde nails

BackgroundThe aim of the study was to compare the initial construct stability of two retrograde intramedullary nail systems for tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis (TTCF) (A3, Small Bone Innovations; HAN, Synthes) in a biomechanical cadaver study.MethodsNine pairs of human cadaver bones were instrumented with two different retrograde nail systems. One tibia from each pair was randomized to either rod. The bone mineral density was determined via tomography to ensure the characteristics in each pair of tibiae were similar. All tests were performed in load-control. Displacements and forces were acquired by the sensors of the machine at a rate of 64 Hz. Specimens were tested in a stepwise progression starting with six times ±125N with a frequency of 1 Hz for 250 cycles each step was performed (1500 cycles). The maximum load was then increased to ±250N for another 14 steps or until specimen failure occurred (up to 3500 cycles).ResultsAverage bone mineral density was 67.4 mgHA/ccm and did not differ significantly between groups (t-test, p = .28). Under cyclic loading, the range of motion (dorsiflexion/plantarflexion) at 250N was significantly lower for the HAN-group with 7.2 ± 2.3 mm compared to the A3-group with 11.8 ± 2.9 mm (t-test, p < 0.01). Failure was registered for the HAN after 4571 ± 1134 cycles and after 2344 ± 1195 cycles for the A3 (t-test, p = .031). Bone mineral density significantly correlated with the number of cycles to failure in both groups (Spearman-Rho, r > .69, p < 0.01).ConclusionsThe high specimen age and low bone density simulates an osteoporotic bone situation. The HAN with only lateral distal bend but two calcaneal locking screws showed higher stability (higher number of cycles to failure and lower motion such as dorsiflexion/plantarflexion during cyclic loading) than the A3 with additional distal dorsal bend but only one calcaneal locking screw. Both constructs showed sufficient stability compared with earlier data from a similar test model.Clinical relevanceThe data suggest that both implants allow for sufficient primary stability for TTCF in osteoporotic and consequently also in non-osteoporotic bone.Level of evidenceNot applicable, experimental basic science study.     

Reconstruction of a missing or insufficient distal fibula in the setting of a total ankle replacement: The Milanese technique

BackgroundThe presence of an intact distal fibula is reported as a prerequisite when considering total ankle replacement and its lack is usually considered a contraindication. The purpose of the study was to describe the results of a surgical technique to reconstruct the distal fibula (Milanese fibular reconstruction technique) in the setting of a total ankle replacement and insufficient fibula.MethodsRetrospective analysis of 15 patients (15 ankles) who underwent rotational fibular reconstruction technique with minimum follow-up of 24 months. Patients were evaluated preoperatively and at the last follow-up with AOFAS Ankle and Hindfoot score, VAS pain scale, SF-12 and range of motion. Standard weightbearing radiographs were used for radiographic assessment.ResultsThe average of all clinical scores significantly improved (P < .001). The average radiographic parameters showed a neutral alignment. No cases of reabsorption of the new lateral malleolus were observed even in cases with complications that accounted for 2 superficial wound infection and 2 deep infections.ConclusionsThe Milanese fibular reconstruction technique can successfully reestablish a lateral strut and in the setting of an ankle prosthesis in patients with an insufficient fibula.     

Is intraoperative pedography helpful in clinical use—Preliminary results of 100 cases from a consecutive,prospective, randomized,controlled clinical study

BackgroundThe purpose of this study was to assess the clinical use, and to analyze the potential clinical benefit of intraoperative pedography (IP) in a sufficient number of cases in comparison with cases treated without IP.MethodsPatients (age 18 years and older) which sustained an arthrodesis and/or correction of the foot and ankle were included.ResultsOne hundred cases were included (ankle correction arthrodesis, n = 12; subtalar joint correction arthrodesis, n = 14; arthrodesis without correction midfoot, n = 15; correction arthrodesis midfoot, n = 26; correction forefoot, n = 33). Fifty-two patients were randomized for the use of IP. In 24 of the 52 patients (46%), the correction was modified after IP during the same operation.ConclusionsIn 46% of the cases a modification of the surgical correction was made after IP in the same surgical procedure. Whether IP improve the plantar force distribution of the foot and the mid- or long-term clinical outcome has to be critically analyzed when longer follow-up is completed.     

Fragility fractures of the ankle in the elderly: Open reduction and internal fixation versus tibio-talo-calcaneal nailing: Short-term results of a prospective randomized-controlled study

IntroductionThe management of ankle fractures in the elderly remains unpredictable, secondary to their various co-morbidities. Although tibiotalocalcaneal (TTC) nailing has been an effective option for ankle arthrodesis due to ankle arthritis or Charcot arthropathy there are few reports regarding the use of TTC nail for the treatment of ankle fractures.PurposeAim of this study was to compare the results of ORIF versus TTC nailing for the treatment of unstable ankle fractures in the elderly. We hypothesized that the elderly may benefit from TTC nailing, as it allows the patient to be mobilized immediately after surgery and minimizes the risk of wound or bone problems.Patients and methodsThis was a prospective, randomized-controlled, comparative study. Between 2009 and 2015, 43 patients were treated with a TTC nail (Group A) and 44 with ORIF (Group B). The Olerud-Molander ankle score was obtained and intraoperative-postoperative complications, length of hospital stay, mobility status and reoperation rate were recorded. The nail fixation was performed with the TrigenR hindfoot nail after closed reduction. ORIF was performed, using a 1/3 tubular plate and 3.5 mm screws for the lateral malleolus and two 4.0 mm cannulated screws for the medial.ResultsMortality rate at one year was 13.9% for Group A and 18.1% for Group B. Mean follow-up was 14 months (12–18 m). There were no intraoperative complications. Three complications in Group A (8.1%) and twelve (33.3%) in Group B were encountered postoperatively (p < 0.05). There was significant shorter hospital stay in Group A (5.2 ± 3.1d) than in Group B (8.4 ± 5.2d). In Group A, 28 patients returned to their pre-injury mobility status (75.6%) while 9 declined one level of the mobility scale (24.3%). In Group B, 26 patients remained at the same mobility level (72.2%) and 10 declined one level (27.7%). There was no significant difference between the postoperative OMAS scores in the two Groups (56.9 ± 9.85 and 56.6 ± 9.3 respectively).ConclusionsWe believe that TTC nailing is a safe and effective method of treatment of unstable ankle fractures in the elderly because it has a low risk of complications and restores function and mobility allowing an immediate return to full weight-bearing.     

Total ankle replacement in patients with end-stage ankle osteoarthritis: Clinical results and kinetic gait analysis

BackgroundTotal ankle arthroplasty is being used more frequently as an alternative for arthrodesis in final stages of ankle osteoarthritis. However, there are few studies which describe the biomechanics of gait of these patients.MethodsBetween March 2006 and May 2011, 17 patients (n = 18 ankles) suffering end-stage osteoarthritis of the ankle who underwent an ankle replacement (HINTEGRA) were evaluated retrospectively. We evaluated clinical, radiological and biomechanical gait parameters using the NedAMH/IBV dynamometric platform.ResultsAt last follow-up (average: 37 months), the AOFAS score improved from 31 to 83 with a high rate of satisfaction (83.3%). Kinetic gait parameters were more similar to a healthy ankle. We detected a radiolucent line in 8 patients (44%) without any subsidence case.ConclusionsOur study showed a high rate of satisfaction and biomechanics of the gait similar to a healthy ankle. The complication rate was analogous to those previously published in the literature.     

A systematic review of intermediate-term outcomes and failure rates for total ankle replacements: An Asian perspective

BackgroundThere are few records for total ankle replacement (TAR) in Asia. We aimed to report the cumulative intermediate-term outcomes in terms of clinical scores, survivorship and failure rates for patients managed with TAR in Asia.MethodsWe conducted a systematic search for relevant articles published in English and other languages between January 1990 and February 2012. The study published before 1990 and used outdated prosthesis designs implanted before the early 1980s was excluded. Eligible studies were evaluated using the Coleman Methodology Score and data collection was independently performed by three reviewers.ResultsSeven studies qualified for analysis, describing 321 implants (112 HINTEGRA^®, 104 TNK, 35 STAR, 13 ND-Bioceram, 57 un-reported implants). Overall studies showed the improvement of clinical scores following TAR. Pooled data for the survivorship analysis ranged from 100% at 3.2 years to 77% at 14.1 years. Pooled mean failure rate was 4.9 ± 3.2% over a mean follow-up of 5.2 ± 1.7 years.ConclusionsTAR prostheses currently used in Asia achieved satisfactory intermediate-term outcomes in terms of clinical scores, survivorship and failure rates.     

Does the IOFIX improve compression in ankle fusion?

BackgroundThe new IOFIX is an intra-osseous fixation device comprising an “X-post” through which a lag screw passes to apparently improve force distribution across an arthrodesis.We conducted a novel human cadaveric study. Our null hypothesis was no difference in force exists in an ankle arthrodesis model stabilized with the IOFIX or a conventional single lag screw.MethodIn ten cadaver ankles a pressure transducer was compressed as an IOFIX and standard single lag screws were alternately compared.ResultsThe median average force created by the IOFIX was 3.95 kg and 2.4 kg for the single conventional lag screw (p ⩽ 0.01). The IOFIX improved contact area across the arthrodesis with a median average of 3.41 cm² compared with 2.42 cm² in the lag screw group (p ⩽ 0.03).ConclusionOur results suggest an IOFIX improves force distribution across an ankle arthrodesis compared with a single conventional lag screw.