The forces in the anterior cruciate ligament and knee kinematics during a simulated pivot shift test: A human cadaveric study using robotic technology

Purpose: Although it is well known that the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is a primary restraint of the knee under anterior tibial load, the role of the ACL in resisting internal tibial torque and the pivot shift test is controversial. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of these 2 external loading conditions on the kinematics of the intact and ACL-deficient knee and the in situ force in the ACL. Type of Study: This study was a biomechanical study that used cadaveric knees with the intact knee of the specimen serving as a control. Materials and Methods: Twelve human cadaveric knees were tested using a robotic/universal force-moment sensor testing system. This system applied (1) a 10–Newton meter (Nm) internal tibial torque and (2) a combined 10-Nm valgus and 10-Nm internal tibial torque (simulated pivot shift test) to the intact and the ACL-deficient knee. Results: In the ACL-deficient knee, the isolated internal tibial torque significantly increased coupled anterior tibial translation over that of the intact knee by 94%, 48%, and 19% at full extension, 15°, and 30° of flexion, respectively (P <.05). In the case of the simulated pivot shift test, there were similar increases in anterior tibial translation, i.e., 103%, 61%, and 32%, respectively (P <.05). Furthermore, the anterior tibial translation under the simulated pivot shift test was significantly greater than under an isolated internal tibial torque (P <.05). Under the simulated pivot shift test, the in situ forces in the ACL were 83 ± 16 N at full extension and 93 ± 23 N at 15° of knee flexion. These forces were also significantly higher when compared with those for an isolated internal tibial torque (P <.05). Conclusion: Our data indicate that the ACL plays an important role in restraining coupled anterior tibial translation in response to the simulated pivot shift test as well as under an isolated internal tibial torque, especially when the knee is near extension. These findings are also consistent with the clinical observation of anterior tibial subluxation during the pivot shift test with the knee near extension.Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related surgery, Vol 16, No 6 (September), 2000: pp 633–639     

Effect of the iliotibial band on knee biomechanics during a simulated pivot shift test.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of the iliotibial band (ITB) on the kinematics of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) intact and deficient knees and also on the in situ force in the ACL during a simulated pivot shift test. A combination of 10 N-m valgus and 5 N-m internal tibial torques was applied to 10 human cadaveric knees at 15 degrees, 30 degrees, 45 degrees, and 60 degrees of flexion using a robotic/universal force-moment sensor testing system. ITB forces of 0, 22, 44, and 88 N were also applied. An 88 N ITB force significantly decreased coupled anterior tibial translation of ACL deficient knees by 32%-45% at high flexion angles, but did not have a significant effect at low flexion angles. Further, an 88 N ITB force significantly decreased in situ forces in the ACL at all flexion angles by 23%-40%. These results indicate that during the pivot shift test, the ITB can improve tibial reduction at high flexion angles while not affecting subluxation at low flexion angles. Additionally, the action of the ITB as an ACL agonist suggests that its use as an ACL graft might hinder knee stability in response to rotatory load.     

Rotational instability of the knee: internal tibial rotation under a simulated pivot shift test

Introduction  Recently, several publications investigated the rotational instability of the human knee joint under pivot shift examinations and reported the internal tibial rotation as measurement for instrumented knee laxity measurements. We hypothesize that ACL deficiency leads to increased internal tibial rotation under a simulated pivot shift test. Furthermore, it was hypothesized that anatomic single bundle ACL reconstruction significantly reduces the internal tibial rotation under a simulated pivot shift test when compared to the ACL-deficient knee. Methods  In seven human cadaveric knees, the kinematics of the intact knee, ACL-deficient knee, and anatomic single bundle ACL reconstructed knee were determined in response to a 134 N anterior tibial load and a combined rotatory load of 10 N m valgus and 4 N m internal tibial rotation using a robotic/UFS testing system. Statistical analyses were performed using a two-way ANOVA test. Results  Single bundle ACL reconstruction reduced the anterior tibial translation under a simulated KT-1000 test significantly compared to the ACL-deficient knee (P < 0.05). After reconstruction, there was a statistical significant difference to the intact knee at 30° of knee flexion. Under a simulated pivot shift test, anatomic single bundle ACL reconstruction could restore the intact knee kinematics. Internal tibial rotation under a simulated pivot shift showed no significant difference in the ACL-intact, ACL-deficient and ACL-reconstructed knee. Conclusion  In conclusion, ACL deficiency does not increase the internal tibial rotation under a simulated pivot shift test. For objective measurements of the rotational instability of the knee using instrumented knee laxity devices under pivot shift mechanisms, the anterior tibial translation should be rather evaluated than the internal tibial rotation. This study was supported in part by a grant of the German Speaking Association of Arthroscopy (AGA).     

Interaction between the ACL graft and MCL in a combined ACL+MCL knee injury using a goat model

The optimal treatment for the MCL in the combined ACL and MCL-injured knee is still controversial. Therefore, we designed this study to examine the mechanical interaction between the ACL graft and the MCL in a goat model using a robotic/universal force-moment sensor testing system. The kinematics of intact, ACL-deficient, ACL-reconstructed, and ACL-reconstructed/ MCL-deficient knees, as well as the in situ forces in the ACL, ACL graft, and MCL were determined in response to two external loading conditions: 1) anterior tibial load of 67 N and 2) valgus moment of 5 N-m. With an anterior tibial load, anterior tibial translation in the ACL-deficient knee significantly increased from 2.0 and 2.2 mm to 15.7 and 18.1 mm at 30 degrees and 60 degrees of knee flexion, respectively. The in situ forces in the MCL also increased from 8 to 27 N at 60 degrees of knee flexion. ACL reconstruction reduced the anterior tibial translation to within 2 mm of the intact knee and significantly reduced the in situ force in the MCL to 17 N. However, in response to a valgus moment, the in situ forces in the ACL graft increased significantly by 34 N after transecting the MCL. These findings show that ACL deficiency can increase the in situ forces in the MCL while ACL reconstruction can reduce the in situ forces in the MCL in response to an anterior tibial load. On the other hand, the ACL graft is subjected to significantly higher in situ forces with MCL deficiency during an applied valgus moment. Therefore, the ACL-reconstructed knee with a combined ACL and MCL injury should be protected from high valgus moments during early healing to avoid excessive loading on the graft.     

Distribution of in situ forces in the anterior cruciate ligament in response to rotatory loads.

The anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) can be anatomically divided into anteromedial (AM) and posterolateral (PL) bundles. Current ACL reconstruction techniques focus primarily on reproducing the AM bundle, but are insufficient in response to rotatory loads. The objective of this study was to determine the distribution of in situ force between the two bundles when the knee is subjected to anterior tibial and rotatory loads. Ten cadaveric knees (50+/-10 years) were tested using a robotic/universal force-moment sensor (UFS) testing system. Two external loading conditions were applied: a 134 N anterior tibial load at full knee extension and 15 degrees, 30 degrees, 60 degrees, and 90 degrees of flexion and a combined rotatory load of 10 Nm valgus and 5 Nm internal tibial torque at 15 degrees and 30 degrees of flexion. The resulting 6 degrees of freedom kinematics of the knee and the in situ forces in the ACL and its two bundles were determined. Under an anterior tibial load, the in situ force in the PL bundle was the highest at full extension (67+/-30 N) and decreased with increasing flexion. The in situ force in the AM bundle was lower than in the PL bundle at full extension, but increased with increasing flexion, reaching a maximum (90+/-17 N) at 60 degrees of flexion and then decreasing at 90 degrees. Under a combined rotatory load, the in situ force of the PL bundle was higher at 15 degrees (21+/-11 N) and lower at 30 degrees of flexion (14+/-6 N). The in situ force in the AM bundle was similar at 15 degrees and 30 degrees of knee flexion (30+/-15 vs. 35+/-16 N, respectively). Comparing these two external loading conditions demonstrated the importance of the PL bundle, especially when the knee is near full extension. These findings provide a better understanding of the function of the two bundles of the ACL and could serve as a basis for future considerations of surgical reconstruction in the replacement of the ACL.     

Interaction between the ACL graft and MCL in a combined ACL+MCL knee injury using a goat model

The optimal treatment for the MCL in the combined ACL and MCL-injured knee is still controversial. Therefore, we designed this study to examine the mechanical interaction between the ACL graft and the MCL in a goat model using a robotic/universal force-moment sensor testing system. The kinematics of intact, ACL-deficient, ACL-reconstructed, and ACL-reconstructed/MCL-deficient knees, as well as the in situ forces in the ACL, ACL graft, and MCL were determined in response to two external loading conditions: 1) anterior tibial load of 67 N and 2) valgus moment of 5 N-m. With an anterior tibial load, anterior tibial translation in the ACL-deficient knee significantly increased from 2.0 and 2.2 mm to 15.7 and 18.1 mm at 30° and 60° of knee flexion, respectively. The in situ forces in the MCL also increased from 8 to 27 N at 60° of knee flexion. ACL reconstruction reduced the anterior tibial translation to within 2 mm of the intact knee and significantly reduced the in situ force in the MCL to 17 N. However, in response to a valgus moment, the in situ forces in the ACL graft increased significantly by 34 N after transecting the MCL. These findings show that ACL deficiency can increase the in situ forces in the MCL while ACL reconstruction can reduce the in situ forces in the MCL in response to an anterior tibial load. On the other hand, the ACL graft is subjected to significantly higher in situ forces with MCL deficiency during an applied valgus moment. Therefore, the ACL-reconstructed knee with a combined ACL and MCL injury should be protected from high valgus moments during early healing to avoid excessive loading on the graft.     

Interaction between the ACL graft and MCL in a combined ACL+MCL knee injury using a goat model

The optimal treatment for the MCL in the combined ACL and MCL-injured knee is still controversial. Therefore, we designed this study to examine the mechanical interaction between the ACL graft and the MCL in a goat model using a robotic/universal force-moment sensor testing system. The kinematics of intact, ACL-deficient, ACL-reconstructed, and ACL-reconstructed/MCL-deficient knees, as well as the in situ forces in the ACL, ACL graft, and MCL were determined in response to two external loading conditions: 1) anterior tibial load of 67 N and 2) valgus moment of 5 N-m. With an anterior tibial load, anterior tibial translation in the ACL-deficient knee significantly increased from 2.0 and 2.2 mm to 15.7 and 18.1 mm at 30° and 60° of knee flexion, respectively. The in situ forces in the MCL also increased from 8 to 27 N at 60° of knee flexion. ACL reconstruction reduced the anterior tibial translation to within 2 mm of the intact knee and significantly reduced the in situ force in the MCL to 17 N. However, in response to a valgus moment, the in situ forces in the ACL graft increased significantly by 34 N after transecting the MCL. These findings show that ACL deficiency can increase the in situ forces in the MCL while ACL reconstruction can reduce the in situ forces in the MCL in response to an anterior tibial load. On the other hand, the ACL graft is subjected to significantly higher in situ forces with MCL deficiency during an applied valgus moment. Therefore, the ACL-reconstructed knee with a combined ACL and MCL injury should be protected from high valgus moments during early healing to avoid excessive loading on the graft.     

Knee stability and graft function following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Comparison between 11 o'clock and 10 o'clock femoral tunnel placement

Purpose: To study how well an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) graft fixed at the 10 and 11 o'clock positions can restore knee function in response to both externally applied anterior tibial and combined rotatory loads by comparing the biomechanical results with each other and with the intact knee. Type of Study: Biomechanical experiment using human cadaveric specimens. Methods: Ten human cadaveric knees (age, 41±13 years) were reconstructed by placing a bone–patellar tendon–bone graft at the 10 and 11 o'clock positions, in a randomized order, and then tested using a robotic/universal force-moment sensor testing system. Two external loading conditions were applied: (1) 134 N anterior tibial load with the knee at full extension, 15°, 30°, 60°, and 90° of flexion, and (2) a combined rotatory load of 10 N-m valgus and 5 N-m internal tibial torque with the knee at 15° and 30° of flexion. The resulting kinematics of the reconstructed knee and in situ forces in the ACL graft were determined for each femoral tunnel position. Results: In response to a 134-N anterior tibial load, anterior tibial translation (ATT) for both femoral tunnel positions was not significantly different from the intact knee except at 90° of knee flexion as well as at 60° of knee flexion for the 10 o'clock position. There was no significant difference in the ATT between the 10 and 11 o'clock positions, except at 90° of knee flexion. Under a combined rotatory load, however, the coupled ATT for the 11 o'clock position was approximately 130% of that for the intact knee at 15° and 30° of flexion. For the 10 o'clock position, the coupled ATT was not significantly different from the intact knee at 15° of flexion and approximately 120% of that for the intact knee at 30° of flexion. Coupled ATT for the 10 o'clock position was significantly smaller than for the 11 o'clock position at 15° and 30° of flexion. The in situ force in the ACL graft was also significantly higher for the 10 o'clock position than the 11 o'clock position at 30° of flexion in response to the same loading condition (70 ± 18 N v 60 ± 15 N, respectively). Conclusions: The 10 o'clock position more effectively resists rotatory loads when compared with the 11 o'clock position as evidenced by smaller ATT and higher in situ force in the graft. Despite the fact that ACL grafts placed at the 10 or 11 o'clock positions are equally effective under an anterior tibial load, neither femoral tunnel position was able to fully restore knee stability to the level of the intact knee.Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery, Vol 19, No 3 (March), 2003: pp 297–304     

Anterolateral rotational knee instability: role of posterolateral structures

Introduction The aim of this study was to determine the anterolateral rotational instability (ALRI) of the human knee after rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and after additional injury of the different components of the posterolateral structures (PLS). It was hypothesized that a transsection of the ACL will significantly increase the ALRI of the knee and furthermore that sectioning the PLS [lateral collateral ligament (LCL), popliteus complex (PC)] will additionally significantly increase the ALRI. Materials and methods Five human cadaveric knees were used for dissection to study the appearance and behaviour of the structures of the posterolateral corner under anterior tibial load. Ten fresh-frozen human cadaver knees were subjected to anterior tibial load of 134 N and combined rotatory load of 10 Nm valgus and 4 Nm internal tibial torque using a robotic/universal force moment sensor (UFS) testing system and the resulting knee kinematics were determined for intact, ACL-, LCL- and PC-deficient (popliteus tendon and popliteofibular ligament) knee. Statistical analyses were performed using a two-way ANOVA test with the level of significance set at P < 0.05. Results Sectioning the ACL significantly increased the anterior tibial translation (ATT) and internal tibial rotation under a combined rotatory load at 0 and 30° flexion (P < 0.05). Sectioning the LCL further increased the ALRI significantly at 0°, 30° and 60° of flexion (P < 0.05). Subsequent cutting of the PC increased the ATT under anterior tibial load (P < 0.05), but did not increase the ALRI (P > 0.05). Conclusion The results of the current study confirm the concept that the rupture of the ACL is associated with ALRI. Current reconstruction techniques should focus on restoring the anterolateral rotational knee instability to the intact knee. Additional injury to the LCL further increases the anterior rotational instability significantly, while the PC is less important. Cautions should be taken when examining a patient with ACL rupture to diagnose injuries to the primary restraints of tibial rotation such as the LCL. If an additional extraarticular stabilisation technique is needed for severe ALRI, the technique should be able to restore the function of the LCL and not the PC. This study is a winner of the AGA DonJoy Award 2006.     

Clinical analysis of the pivot shift tests: description of the pivot drawer test

A clinical analysis of the pivot shift was performed by evaluating 100 patients with unilateral anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) insufficiency in an office setting. Each patient was examined in a random order using the Macintosh, Losee, Hughston, Slocum, pivot drawer, and flexion rotation drawer versions of the pivot shift test. Pathologic anterior tibial displacement was estimated with the Lachman test and quantitatively measured using the KT-1000 knee ligament arthrometer. Pivot shift was graded as 0 (absent), grade I (slight), grade II (definite subluxation), and grade III (subluxation and momentary locking). The presence or absence of any degree of pivot shift was correlated with the arthroscopic finding of a torn ACL. Results indicated the "drawer type" tests were significantly more sensitive than other versions of the pivot shift because they can be performed without causing significant pain and muscle spasm, and the limb position maximizes pathologic coupled motion. A correlation between increasing displacement estimated with the Lachman test and measured displacement with the KT-1000 arthrometer revealed that as pathologic displacement increases so does the grade of the Slocum, pivot drawer, and flexion rotation drawer tests. We recommend using the pivot drawer or flexion rotation drawer as a standard method for assessing the pivot shift phenomenon.     

In-situ force in the medial and lateral structures of intact and ACL-deficient knees

The anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is the major contributor to limit excessive anterior tibial translation (ATT) when the knee is subjected to an anterior tibial load. However, the importance of the medial and lateral structures of the knee can also play a significant role in resisting anterior tibial loads, especially in the event of an ACL injury. Therefore, the objective of this study was to determine quantitatively the increase in the in-situ forces in the medial collateral ligament (MCL) and posterolateral structures (PLS) of the knee associated with ACL deficiency. Eight fresh-frozen cadaveric human knees were subjected to a 134-N anterior tibial load at full extension and at 15°, 30°, 60°, and 90° of knee flexion. The resulting 5 degrees of freedom kinematics were measured for the intact and the ACL-deficient knees. A robotic/universal force-moment sensor testing system was used for this purpose, as well as to determine the in-situ force in the MCL and PLS in the intact and ACL-deficient knees. For the intact knee, the in-situ forces in both the MCL and PLS were less than 20 N for all five flexion angles tested. But in the ACL-deficient knee, the in-situ forces in the MCL and PLS, respectively, were approximately two and five times as large as those in the intact knee (P < 0.05). The results of this study demonstrate that, although both the MCL and PLS play only a minor role in resisting anterior tibial loads in the intact knee, they become significant after ACL injury. Received: December 3, 1999 / Accepted: July 19, 2000     

Evaluation of bone tunnel placement for suture augmentation of an injured anterior cruciate ligament: Effects on joint stability in a goat model

Use of novel tissue engineering approaches to heal an injured anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) requires suture repair and/or augmentation to provide joint stability. We evaluated the effects of the location of suture augmentation at the femur and tibia in terms of joint stability using a goat model. Eight goat stifle joints were tested with augmentation sutures placed in two femoral tunnel locations: (1) anterior to, or (2) through the ACL footprint, and two tibial tunnel locations: (1) medial to, or (2) medial and lateral to the footprint. Using a robotic/universal force‐moment sensor testing system, the anterior tibial translation (ATT) and the corresponding in situ force carried by the sutures were obtained at 30°, 60°, and 90° of flexion in response to external loads. No significant differences were found between augmentation groups due to tunnel location in terms of ATT or the in situ forces carried by the sutures at all flexion angles tested. Similar results were found under 5 N m of varus–valgus torque. Under a 67 N anterior tibial load, the ATT was restored to within 3 mm of the intact joint following suture augmentation (p > 0.05). Suture augmentation, when placed close to the ACL insertion, could be helpful in providing initial joint stability to aid ACL healing in the goat model. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 28:1373–1379, 2010     

Primary and coupled motions in the intact and the ACL-deficient knee: an in vitro study in the goat model.

Quadrupeds are commonly used as animal models to study healing of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructions. While rabbits, dogs, goats, and sheep have been used, goats and sheep are increasingly being employed because of the larger joint size that facilitates surgery, ease of availability, and lower expense to maintain in the farm environment. In spite of this, little is known about the function of the ACL in controlling primary and coupled motions in the quadruped. We report here on the measurements of these motions in goats, with the application of anterior-posterior forces, varus-valgus moments, and internal-external moments in the intact and ACL-deficient knee. Sectioning the ACL caused significant increases in primary anterior translation, and in varus-valgus and internal rotations. The increases in anterior translation were similar in amount and dependence on flexion angle to those seen in human knees. The increase in varus averaged 7 degrees and did not depend on flexion angle, whereas the increase in valgus was significant only in the flexed knee. The increases in internal tibial rotation were greatest in extension, whereas the increases in external rotation were small and independent of flexion angle. When the ACL was cut, coupled internal rotation increased with an anterior force as well as a valgus moment. Large increases were seen in coupled anterior translation with the application of varus and valgus moments, whereas smaller increases were seen with internal and external moments. These findings demonstrate that the ACL restrains multiple motions in the goat knee. This study also provides baseline data for future studies of ACL reconstruction.     

Medial collateral ligament insertion site and contact forces in the ACL-deficient knee.

The objectives of this research were to determine the effects of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) deficiency on medial collateral ligament (MCL) insertion site and contact forces during anterior tibial loading and valgus loading using a combined experimental-finite element (FE) approach. Our hypothesis was that ACL deficiency would increase MCL insertion site forces at the attachments to the tibia and femur and increase contact forces between the MCL and these bones. Six male knees were subjected to varus-valgus and anterior-posterior loading at flexion angles of 0 degrees and 30 degrees. Three-dimensional joint kinematics and MCL strains were recorded during kinematic testing. Following testing, the MCL of each knee was removed to establish a stress-free reference configuration. An FE model of the femur-MCL-tibia complex was constructed for each knee to simulate valgus rotation and anterior translation at 0 degrees and 30 degrees, using subject-specific bone and ligament geometry and joint kinematics. A transversely isotropic hyperelastic material model with average material coefficients taken from a previous study was used to represent the MCL. Subject-specific MCL in situ strain distributions were used in each model. Insertion site and contact forces were determined from the FE analyses. FE predictions were validated by comparing MCL fiber strains to experimental measurements. The subject-specific FE predictions of MCL fiber stretch correlated well with the experimentally measured values (R2 = 0.95). ACL deficiency caused a significant increase in MCL insertion site and contact forces in response to anterior tibial loading. In contrast, ACL deficiency did not significantly increase MCL insertion site and contact forces in response to valgus loading, demonstrating that the ACL is not a restraint to valgus rotation in knees that have an intact MCL. When evaluating valgus laxity in the ACL-deficient knee, increased valgus laxity indicates a compromised MCL.     

The short-term outcome of surgical treatment for painful varus arthritis in association with chronic ACL deficiency

A review of patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) insufficiency, symptomatic medial compartment osteoarthritis, and varus malalignment of the knee was performed. Twenty-six patients met the inclusion criteria. Twelve patients were treated with a valgus closing-wedge high tibial osteotomy (group 1). Fourteen patients were treated with a valgus closing-wedge high tibial osteotomy combined with arthroscopic ACL reconstruction (group 2). Twenty-five patients were available for follow-up at a minimum of 2 years. For group 1 patients, high tibial osteotomy alone had no effect on the Lachman test or pivot shift phenomena. For group 2 patients, combined high tibial osteotomy/ACL reconstruction resulted in a grade 1 Lachman test in 11 of 13 patients, and a negative pivot shift in 12 of 13 patients. No deficits in range of motion were noted in either group. Prior to surgery, 14 (56%) patients participated in recreational sports; 23 (92%) patients were able to participate in recreational sports at follow-up. Radiographs demonstrated osteoarthritic progression in group 1 and 2 patients (P<.05). The results of this study suggest that high tibial osteotomy alone and combined high tibial osteotomy/ACL reconstructions are effective in the surgical treatment of varus, ACL-deficient knees with symptomatic medial compartment arthritis; however, good or excellent results were more often seen after the combined procedure.     

Effects of the tibial tunnel position on knee joint stability and meniscal contact pressure after double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

BackgroundTo investigate the effect of the tibial tunnel position on knee stability and the maximum contact area and peak contact pressure on the menisci after double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.MethodsTen human knee specimens (mean age: 74.1 ± 15.8 years) were used in this study. The anterior tibial loading test was conducted using a material testing machine at 30°, 60°, and 90° of knee flexion, with the anterior tibial translation (ATT) and the maximum contact area and peak contact pressure on the menisci measured. Outcome measures were compared between the following groups: 1) intact ACL (intact group); 2) anatomical tibial tunnel position (anatomical group) and 3) posterior tibial tunnel position (posterior group) with double-bundle reconstruction, and 4) ACL-deficient (deficient group).ResultsIn response to a 100 N anterior tibial load, the ATT was greater for the posterior and ACL-deficient groups compared to that in the intact group. The normalized maximum contact area of the medial meniscus significantly decreased for the posterior group compared to that in the intact group. The normalized peak contact pressure on the medial meniscus increased in all groups compared to that in the intact group, but with no between-group differences in pressure applied to the lateral meniscus.ConclusionsATT and contact pressure on the medial meniscus increased, concomitant with a decrease in contact area of the medial meniscus, as the position of the tibial tunnel position moved towards a posterior position.     

Effects of combined knee loadings on posterior cruciate ligament force generation

Resultant forces in the posterior cruciate ligament were measured under paired combinations of posterior tibial force, internal and external tibial torque, and varus and valgus moment. The force generated in the ligament from a straight 100 N posterior tibial force was highly sensitive to the angle of knee flexion. For example, at 90 of flexion the mean resultant force in the posterior cruciate ligament was 112% of the applied posterior tibial force, whereas at 0°, only 16% of the applied posterior force was measured in the ligament. When the tibia was preloaded by 10 Nm of external torque, only 9–13% of the 100 N posterior tibial force was transmitted to the posterior cruciate ligament at flexion angles less than 60° at 90° of flexion, 61% was carried by the ligament. This “off-loading” of the posterior cruciate ligament also occurred when the tibia was preloaded by 10 Nm or internal torque, but only at knee flexion angles between 20 and 40°. The addition of 10 Nm of valgus moment to a knee loaded by a 100 N posterior tibial force increased the mean force in the posterior cruciate ligament at all flexion angles except hyperextension: this represents a common and potentially dangerous loading combination. The addition of 10 Nm of varus moment to a knee loaded by a 100 N posterior tibial force increased the mean force in the posterior cruciate ligament at all flexion angles except hyperextension; this represents a common and potentially dangerous loading combination. The addition of 10 Nm of varus moment to a knee loaded by a 100 N posterior tibial force decreased the mean force in the ligament between 10 and 70° of flexion. External tibial torque (alone or combined with varus or valgus moment) was not an important loading mechanism in the posterior cruciate ligament. The application of internal torque plus varus moment at 90° of flexion produced the greatest posterior cruciate ligament forces in our study and represented the only potential injury mechanism that did not involve posterior tibial force.     

Anatomical versus Non-Anatomical Single Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Cadaveric Study of Comparison of Knee Stability

Background

The purpose of this study was to compare the initial stability of anatomical and non-anatomical single bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction and to determine which would better restore intact knee kinematics. Our hypothesis was that the initial stability of anatomical single bundle ACL reconstruction would be superior to that of non-anatomical single bundle ACL reconstruction.

Methods

Anterior tibial translation (ATT) and internal rotation of the tibia were measured with a computer navigation system in seven pairs of fresh-frozen cadaveric knees under two testing conditions (manual maximum anterior force, and a manual maximum anterior force combined with an internal rotational force). Tests were performed at 0, 30, 60, and 90 degrees of flexion with the ACL intact, the ACL transected, and after reconstruction of one side of a pair with either anatomical or non-anatomical single bundle ACL reconstruction.

Results

Under manual maximal anterior force, both reconstruction techniques showed no significant difference of ATT when compared to ACL intact knee state at 30° of knee flexion (p > 0.05). Under the combined anterior and internal rotatory force, non-anatomical single-bundle ACL reconstruction showed significant difference of ATT compared to those in ACL intact group (p < 0.05). In contrast, central anatomical single bundle ACL reconstruction showed no significant difference of ATT compared to those in ACL intact group (p > 0.05). Internal rotation of the tibia showed no significant difference in the ACL intact, the ACL transected, non-anatomical reconstructed and anatomical reconstructed knees.

Conclusions

Anatomical single bundle ACL reconstruction restored the initial stability closer to the native ACL under combined anterior and internal rotational forces when compared to non-anatomical ACL single bundle reconstruction.     

Intraoperative measurement of knee kinematics in reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament

Our objectives were to establish the envelope of passive movement and to demonstrate the kinematic behaviour of the knee during standard clinical tests before and after reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL). An electromagnetic device was used to measure movement of the joint during surgery. Reconstruction of the ACL significantly reduced the overall envelope of tibial rotation (10 degrees to 90 degrees flexion), moved this envelope into external rotation from 0 degrees to 20 degrees flexion, and reduced the anterior position of the tibial plateau (5 degrees to 30 degrees flexion) (p < 0.05 for all). During the pivot-shift test in early flexion there was progressive anterior tibial subluxation with internal rotation. These subluxations reversed suddenly around a mean position of 36 +/- 9 degrees of flexion of the knee and consisted of an external tibial rotation of 13 +/- 8 degrees combined with a posterior tibial translation of 12 +/- 8 mm. This abnormal movement was abolished after reconstruction of the ACL.     

Soleus and gastrocnemius muscle loading decreases anterior tibial translation in anterior cruciate ligament intact and deficient knees

This study evaluated the effect of the gastrocnemius and soleus muscles on dynamic knee stability by studying the effect of passive calf muscle loading on anterior tibial translation in normal and anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) deficient knees. Anterior tibial translation was measured bilaterally in 12 anesthetized patients with unilateral ACL-deficient knees using a KT-1000 arthrometer. An ankle-foot orthosis was used to passively dorsiflex the ankle and generate tension in the calf muscles. As the ankle flexion angle was progressively changed from 30 degrees plantar flexion to 10 degrees dorsiflexion, anterior tibial translation decreased 43% and 37% with manual maximum force in normal and ACL-deficient knees, respectively (P < .0001). These findings suggest that the calf muscles may function as dynamic knee stabilizers. Anterior tibial translation also was measured in four cadaver knees. Significant decreases were seen in anterior tibial translation with progressive ankle dorsiflexion in ACL-intact specimens and after the ACL had been cut (P < .05). This effect persisted when the gastrocnemius muscle was cut, but was lost when the soleus muscle was released. The data suggest that the soleus muscle may play a role in dynamically stabilizing the knee.