Neuroinflammation as potential precursor of leukoencephalopathy in early-stage breast cancer patients: A cross-sectional PET-MRI study

BackgroundAlthough chemotherapy-induced leukoencephalopathy has been described in case and cohort studies, literature remains inconclusive about its prevalence and mechanisms. Therefore, we investigated the presence of leukoencephalopathy after multiagent chemotherapy in women treated for breast cancer and potential underlying neuroinflammatory processes.MethodsIn this exploratory study, 15 chemotherapy-treated and 15 age-matched chemotherapy-naïve patients with early-stage breast cancer, as well as 15 healthy controls underwent simultaneous PET-MR neuroimaging, including T1-weighted MPRAGE, T2-weighted FLAIR and dynamic PET with the 18-kDA translocator protein (TSPO) radioligand [¹⁸F]DPA-714. Total and regional (juxtacortical, periventricular, deep white matter and infratentorial) lesion burden were compared between the groups with one-way ANOVA. With paired t-tests, [¹⁸F]DPA-714 volume of distribution [V_T, including partial volume correction (PVC)] in lesioned and normal appearing white matter (NAWM) were compared within subjects, to investigate inflammation. Finally, two general linear models were used to examine the predictive values of neurofilament light-chain (NfL) serum levels on (1) total lesion burden or (2) PVC [¹⁸F]DPA-714 V_T of lesions showing elevated inflammation.ResultsNo significant differences were found in total or localized lesion burden. However, significantly higher (20–45%) TSPO uptake was observed in juxtacortical lesions (p ≤ 0.008, t ≥ 3.90) compared to NAWM in both cancer groups, but only persisted for chemotherapy-treated patients after PVC (p = 0.005, t = 4.30). NfL serum levels were not associated with total lesion volume or tracer uptake in juxtacortical lesions.ConclusionThis multimodal neuroimaging study suggests that neuroinflammatory processes could be involved in the development of juxtacortical, but not periventricular or deep white matter, leukoencephalopathy shortly after chemotherapy for early-stage breast cancer.     

Characterizing response to a dynamic stability modeled approach for thumb carpometacarpal joint pain: A retrospective study

Study DesignRetrospective case series.IntroductionLiterature trends indicate that thumb dynamic stabilization may benefit clients with thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) joint pain and arthritis. There is minimal research investigating whether client characteristics predict responsiveness to hand therapy for thumb dynamic stabilization.Purpose of the Study1) To investigate how adults with thumb CMC joint pain responded to a hand therapy dynamic stabilization modeled intervention. 2) To determine if various client factors influenced responsiveness and to what extent.MethodsAn electronic medical record search identified adults treated from August 2009 through December 2015 for thumb CMC joint pain. Radiographs were retrospectively staged. Outcome measures were 1) Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) total disability score and 2) Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS). Paired t-tests were performed to compare pre and post treatment measures. Multivariate analyses were used to investigate predictive factors.ResultsA total of 249 charts were analyzed. Large overall significant effects were noted for disability score (QuickDASH P <.001, X = 12.1, Cohen's d = 0.9). The average improvement of 2.1 (SD = 2.6) points exceeded the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of 1.7 points on the NPRS pain scale. Significant predictors of QuickDASH Scores were radiographic staging, bilateral hand involvement and initial pain ratings. Significant predictors for change in pain scores (meeting or exceeding the minimal clinically important difference for the NPRS) were bilateral thumb involvement and initial “pain at worst” rating.ConclusionAfter completing hand therapy with a dynamic stabilization approach, clients had less pain and disability. Those who had unilateral thumb pain, or those who started with higher pain levels were most likely to have clinically meaningful improvements in pain. Clients in early CMC osteoarthritis (OA) stages responded better than those in later stages, indicating that early referral to therapy is important.     

Advanced preoperative three-dimensional planning decreases the surgical complications of using large-for-size grafts in pediatric living donor liver transplantation

BackgroundUsing “large-for-size” liver graft, graft-to-recipient weight ratio (GRWR) ≥4%, has been debated in pediatric liver transplantation due to possible graft compartment after abdomen closure. Meticulous preoperative evaluation with three-dimensional (3D) techniques may prevent these problems. This study compared the safety of large-for-size grafts in pediatric living donor liver transplantation (PLDLT) during the eras with or without 3D planning.MethodsWe defined the 3D era was after November 2017 due to our first implication of 3D printing for surgical planning and subsequently developing a 3D simulation implanting model. From November 2004 to July 2021, we enrolled 30 PLDLT patients with body weight (BW) < 10 kg and categorized them into conventional group: GRWR ≥4% before the 3D era (n = 9), 3D group: GRWR ≥4% in the 3D era (n = 8), and control group: GRWR <4% (n = 13). We followed and compared their clinical outcomes.ResultsThe 3D group had the lowest BW and the highest graft volume reduction rate, with all receiving modified left lateral segments (LLS), such as reduced LLS (n = 2), hyperreduced LLS (n = 5), and segment 2 monosegment (n = 1). Overall postoperative complications were similar in conventional and control groups but significantly lower in the 3D group (OR 0.06, 95% CI 0.006?0.70, p = 0.025). However, all groups had similar graft and patient survival at 1, 2, and 4 years.ConclusionAdvanced preoperative 3D planning can decrease post-transplant complications and increase the safety of large-for-size grafts in PLDLT.Level of EvidenceType of study: Retrospective comparative study; Evidence level: Level III     

Relative motion flexion following zone I-III flexor tendon repair: Concepts,evidence and practice.

Study DesignNarrative review and case series.IntroductionThe relative motion approach has been applied to rehabilitation following flexor tendon repair. Positioning the affected finger(s) in relatively more metacarpophalangeal joint flexion is hypothesized to reduce the tension through the repaired flexor digitorum profundus by the quadriga effect. It is also hypothesized that altered patterns of co-contraction and co-inhibition may further reduce flexor digitorum profundus tension, and confer protection to flexor digitorum superficialis.MethodsWe reviewed the existing literature to explore the rationale for using relative motion flexion orthoses as an early active mobilization strategy for patients after zone I-III flexor tendon repairs. We used this approach within our own clinic for the rehabilitation of a series of patients presenting with zone I-II flexor tendon repair. We collected routine clinical and patient reported outcome data.ResultsWe report published outcomes of the clinical use of relative motion flexion orthoses with early active motion, implemented as the primary rehabilitation approach after zone I-III flexor digitorum repairs. We also report novel outcome data from 18 patients.DiscussionWe discuss our own experience of using relative motion flexion as a rehabilitation strategy following flexor tendon repair. We explore orthosis fabrication, rehabilitation exercises and functional hand use.ConclusionsThere is currently limited evidence informing use of relative motion flexion orthoses following flexor tendon repair. We highlight key areas for future research and describe a current pragmatic randomized controlled trial.     

Functional outcomes and complications after treatment of distal radius fracture in patients sixty years and over: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

AimThis network meta-analysis aims to compare functional outcomes and complications between conservative treatment and surgery for distal radius fractures in patients aged 60 years and over.MethodsWe searched the PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effect of conservative treatment and surgery for distal radius fractures in patients aged 60 years and over. Primary outcomes included grip strength and overall complications. Secondary outcomes included Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) scores, Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) scores, wrist range of motion and forearm rotation, and radiographic assessment. All continuous outcomes were assessed using standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and binary outcomes were assessed using odds ratio (OR) with 95% CIs. The surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) was used to determine a hierarchy of treatments. Cluster analysis was performed for grouping treatments based on the SUCRA values of primary outcomes.ResultsFourteen RCTs were included to compare conservative treatment, volar lockedplate (VLP), K-wires fixation, and external-fixation. VLP outperformed conservative treatment for 1-year and minimum 2-year grip strength (SMD; 0.28 [0.07 to 0.48] and 0.27 [0.02 to 0.53], respectively). VLP yielded the optimal grip strength at 1-year and minimum 2-year follow-up (SUCRA; 89.8% and 86.7%, respectively). In a subgroup analysis of patients aged 60 to 80 years old, VLP outperformed conservative treatment in DASH and PRWE scores (SMD, 0.33 [0.10, 0.56] and 0.23 [0.01, 0.45], respectively). In addition, VLP had the fewest complications (SUCRA = 84.3%). Cluster analysis suggested that VLP and K-wire fixation were more effective treatment groups.ConclusionEvidence to date demonstrates that VLP provides measurable benefits in grip strength and fewer complications to those 60 years of age and over, and that benefit is not reflected in current practice guidelines. There is a subgroup of patients where K-wire fixation outcomes are similar to those of VLP; defining this subgroup may yield substantial societal benefits.     

Deep Sternal Wound Infection and Mortality in Cardiac Surgery: A Meta-analysis

BackgroundDeep sternal wound infection (DSWI) is a rare but severe complication after cardiac surgical procedures and has been associated with increased early morbidity and mortality. Studies reporting long-term outcomes in patients with DSWI have shown contradictory results. We performed a study-level meta-analysis evaluating the impact of DSWI on short- and long-term clinical outcomes.MethodsA systematic literature search was conducted to identify studies comparing short- and long-term outcomes of patients submitted to cardiac surgical procedures who developed DSWI and patients who did not. The primary outcome was overall mortality. Secondary outcomes were in-hospital mortality, follow-up mortality, major adverse cardiovascular events, myocardial infarction, and repeat revascularization. Postoperative outcomes were also investigated.ResultsTwenty-four studies totaling 407 829 patients were included. Overall, 6437 (1.6%) patients developed DSWI. Mean follow-up was 3.5 years. DSWI was associated with higher overall mortality (incidence rate ratio [IRR], 1.99; 95% CI, 1.66-2.38; P < .001), in-hospital mortality (odds ratio, 3.30; 95% CI, 1.88-5.81; P < .001), follow-up mortality (IRR, 2.02; 95% CI, 1.39-2.94; P = .001), and major adverse cardiovascular events (IRR, 2.04; 95% CI, 1.60-2.59; P < .001). No differences in myocardial infarction and repeat revascularization were found, but limited studies reported those outcomes. DSWI was associated with longer postoperative hospitalization, stroke, myocardial infarction, and respiratory and renal failure. Sensitivity analyses on isolated coronary artery bypass grafting studies and by adjustment method were consistent with the main analysis.ConclusionsCompared with patients who did not develop DSWI, patients with DSWI after cardiac surgical procedures had increased risk of death as well as short- and long-term adverse clinical outcomes.     

A cadaveric biomechanical evaluation of anterior posterior compression II injuries

PurposePelvic fractures are associated with high morbidity and often require surgical intervention. An Anterior Posterior Compression (APC) II injury consists of disruption at the pubic symphysis and anterior sacroiliac joint. Studies investigating specific ligamentous contributions would aid in development of novel fixation techniques. The objective of this study is to determine the level of pelvic destabilization from progressive soft tissue disruptions associated with APC II injuries.MethodsSix fresh-frozen cadaveric pelvises were dissected of soft tissues, preserving joint capsules and ligaments. Each pelvis was secured in a double-leg stance and joint motion was tracked with the specimens cyclically loaded to 60% body weight. Each specimen was measured in the intact state and again following stepwise destabilization to an APC II injury model (PS: sectioned pubic symphysis, IPS JOINT: PS + ipsilateral anterior sacroiliac, sacrotuberous, sacrospinous ligaments sectioned, IPS LIGS: IPS JOINT + ipsilateral interosseous ligaments sectioned, IPS JOINT+CONT ASI: IPS LIGS + contralateral anterior sacroiliac ligament disruption).ResultsCompared to the intact state, there was a statistically significant increase in movement in the IPS JOINT (ipsilateral 177%, p<0.001; contralateral 46%, p<0.005) and IPS JOINT+CONT ASI (ipsilateral 184%, p<0.002; and contralateral 62%, p<0.002) states bilaterally. No significant change was demonstrated in the PS or IPS LIGS state.ConclusionDisruption of ipsilateral ligamentous structures destabilized both sacroiliac joints. The interosseous and posterior sacroiliac ligaments provide the majority of stability of the sacroiliac joint and will likely benefit most from surgical stabilization.Level of Evidencemechanism-based reasoning.     

Generating consensus on road safety issues and priorities in Ghana: A modified Delphi approach

BackgroundImplementation of evidence-based approaches to reduce the substantial health, social, and financial burdens of road traffic injuries and deaths in Ghana and other low-and-middle-income countries (LMICs) is vitally important. Consensus from national stakeholders can provide insight into what evidence to generate and which interventions to prioritize for road safety. The main objective of this study was to elicit expert views on the barriers to reaching international and national road safety targets, the gaps in national-level research, implementation, and evaluation, and the future action priorities.Materials and MethodsWe used an iterative three-round modified Delphi process to generate consensus among Ghanaian road safety stakeholders. We defined consensus as 70% or more stakeholders selecting a specific response in the survey. We defined partial consensus (termed “majority”) as 50% or more stakeholders selecting a particular response.ResultsTwenty-three stakeholders from different sectors participated. Experts generated consensus on barriers to road safety goals, including the poor regulation of commercial and public transport vehicles and limited use of technology to monitor and enforce traffic behaviors and laws. Stakeholders agreed that the impact of increasing motorcycle (2- and 3-wheel) use on road traffic injury burden is poorly understood and that it is a priority to evaluate road-user risk factors such as speed, helmet use, driving skills, and distracted driving. One emerging area was the impact of unattended/disabled vehicles along roadways. There was consensus on the need for additional research, implementation, and evaluation efforts of several interventions, including focused treatment of hazardous spots, driver training, road safety education as part of academic curricula, promotion of community involvement in first aid, development of strategically positioned trauma centers, and towing of disabled vehicles.ConclusionThis modified Delphi process with stakeholders from Ghana generated consensus on road safety research, implementation, and evaluation priorities.     

Discriminating between benign and malignant salivary gland tumors using diffusion-weighted imaging and intravoxel incoherent motion at 3 Tesla

PurposeThe purpose of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the diagnostic performances of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) for discriminating between benign and malignant salivary gland tumors (SGTs).Materials and methodsSixty-seven patients with 71 SGTs who underwent MRI examination at 3 Tesla were included. There were 34 men and 37 women with a mean age of 57 ± 17 (SD) years (age range: 20–90 years). SGTs included 21 malignant tumors (MTs) and 50 benign SGTs (33 pleomorphic adenomas [PAs] and 17 Warthin's tumors [WTs]). For each SGT, DWI and IVIM parameters, mean, skewness, and kurtosis of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), pure diffusion coefficient (D), pseudo-diffusion coefficient (D*) and perfusion volume fraction (f) were calculated and further compared between SGTs using univariable analysis. Areas under the curves (AUC) of receiver operating characteristic of significant parameters were compared using the Delong test.ResultsSignificant differences in ADC_mean, D_mean and D*_mean were found between SGTs (P < 0.001). The highest AUC values were obtained for ADC_mean (0.949) for identifying PAs and D*_mean (0.985) for identifying WTs and skewness and kurtosis did not outperform mean. To discriminate benign from malignant SGTs with thresholds set to maximize Youden index, IVIM and DWI produced accuracies of 85.9% (61/71; 95% CI: 75.6–93.0) and 77.5% (55/71; 95% CI: 66.0–86.5) but misdiagnosed MTs as benign in 28.6% (6/21) and 61.9% (13/21) of SGTs, respectively. After maximizing specificity to 100% for benign SGTs, the accuracies of IVIM and DWI decreased to 76.1% (54/71; 95% CI: 64.5–85.4) and 64.8% (46/71; 95% CI: 52.5–75.8) but no MTs were misdiagnosed as benign. IVIM and DWI correctly diagnosed 66.0% (33/50) and 50.0% (25/50) of benign SGTs and 46.5% (33/71) and 35.2% (25/71) of all SGTs, respectively.ConclusionIVIM is more accurate than DWI for discriminating between benign and malignant SGTs because of its advantage in detecting WTs. Thresholds set by maximizing specificity for benign SGTs may be advantageous in a clinical setting.     

Evaluation of levetiracetam for early post-traumatic seizure prophylaxis: A level II trauma center experience

IntroductionTraumatic brain injury (TBI) can induce early or late post-traumatic seizures (PTS). While PTS incidence is low, prophylaxis is used despite a lack of consensus on agent or duration. Levetiracetam (LEV) for early PTS prophylaxis is preferred due to its safety and efficacy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate LEV for early PTS prophylaxis.Methods and materialsA single-center, retrospective chart review of TBI patients ≥18 years who received LEV for early PTS prophylaxis between August 2018–July 2019. The primary outcome was LEV duration. Secondary outcomes were incidence of seizure, intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital length of stay (LOS).ResultsOf the 137 included, mean age was 59 ± 20 years and 69.3% were male. The mean admission GCS was 13 ± 4 and 77.4% had mild TBI. Median LEV duration was 7 (IQR 4–10) days and 13.9% met recommended 7-day duration. Those prescribed LEV >7 days had more than twice the median LEV duration than those prescribed ≤7 days [10.25 (8.5–15.5) vs 4 (1.5–4.5) days, p < 0.0001]. Electroencephalography-confirmed PTS occurred in 2.2%, with an early PTS incidence of 0.73%. Median ICU and hospital LOS were 2 (IQR 1–7) and 7 (IQR 3–16) days, respectively.ConclusionsThe incidence of PTS was low as most patients in our study had mild or moderate TBI. Early PTS prophylaxis with LEV for 7 days is appropriate, although the majority of patients did not meet the recommended duration. Efforts to standardize and implement PTS prophylaxis protocols are needed.     

Adductor magnus: Extending the knowledge – A short review of structure and function

Adductor Magnus, the largest single contributor to the adductor group of the medial thigh, is a broad functioning muscle with significant contribution to not only adduction, but extension and rotation at the hip. The aim of this review is to investigate the terminology, anatomical and functional characteristics of AM, particularly its role as an extensor and stabiliser at the hip. AM is anatomically divided into four portions: AM1 through AM4; and functionally divided into two portions: anterior and posterior. Functionally, through a range of activities AM has significant contribution to extension and rotation, and in some scenarios may generate greater hip extension torque than the hamstring group. Rehabilitation exercises should consider compound exercises including hip hinge, squatting and lunge variations to highly activate AM. This review suggests that AM, due to its unique anatomical and functional capabilities should be viewed as a primary extensor amongst a range of tasks and as such, injury identification and rehabilitation should include extension-based testing and resistance exercises to ensure optimal outcomes.     

Thoracoscopic approach for oesophageal atresia: A real game changer?

Almost 23 years have passed since the first thoracoscopic procedure was done. However, according to the recent study in USA, only 16% of newborns with oesophageal atresia and distal tracheooesophageal fistula are managed by thoracoscopic approach with a very high 53% conversion rate. The aim of presentation based on experience of one paediatric surgery centre is to prove that thoracoscopic approach for this malformation is a powerful tool with a potential to change the current results. It requires considerable experience that comes only from the high number of operated cases. The technique is one amongst the many others means which taken together may really help to improve the results. Thus, the question of centralisation for special rare congenital malformations comes back to mind. Is it rational to operate on only 2 or 3 cases a year in a single centre, or is it the time for centralisation and close co-operation, as has been done with biliary atresia treatment in the UK?Level of evidenceIII.     

Biportal endoscopic versus microscopic discectomy for lumbar herniated disc: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND CONTEXTBiportal endoscopic discectomy has been frequently performed in recent years and has shown acceptable clinical outcomes. However, evidence regarding its efficacy and safety remains limited.PURPOSEThis study aimed to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of biportal endoscopic with that of open microscopic discectomy in patients with single-level herniated lumbar discs.STUDY DESIGNProspective, randomized, multicenter, open-label, assessor-blind, non-inferiority controlled trial.PATIENT SAMPLESixty-four participants suffering from low back and leg pain with a single-level herniated lumbar disc and required discectomy.OUTCOME MEASURESOutcomes were assessed with the use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), visual analog scale (VAS) pain score for surgical site, low back and lower extremity, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) for lumbar disabilities, European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions value for quality of life, and painDETECT for neuropathic pain. Surgery-related outcomes such as hospital stay, operation time, and opioid usage were collected. Adverse events occurring during the follow-up period were also noted.METHODSAll participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to undergo biportal endoscopic (biportal group) or microscopic discectomy (microscopy group). The primary outcome was the difference in ODI scores at 12-months post surgically based on a modified intention-to-treat strategy, with a non-inferiority margin of 12.8 points. The secondary outcomes included PROMs, surgery-related outcomes, and adverse events.RESULTSThe ODI score at the 12-month follow-up was 11.97 in the microscopy group and 13.89 in the biportal group (mean difference, 1.92; 95% confidence interval [CI], -3.50 to 7.34), showing the non-inferiority of biportal group. The results for the secondary outcomes were similar to those for the primary outcome. Creatinine phosphokinase ratios were low in the biportal group. Early surgical site pain was slightly lower in the biportal group (mean difference of VAS pain score at 48-hr, -0.98; 95% CI, -1.77 to -0.19). Adverse events including reoperation showed no significant difference between the groups.CONCLUSIONBiportal endoscopic discectomy was non-inferior to microscopic discectomy over a 12 month period. Biportal endoscopic discectomy is suggested to be a relatively safe and effective surgical technique with the slight advantage of reduced muscle damage. However, the clinical implications of surgical site pain should be carefully considered.