Accuracy of pedicle screw insertion in the cervical spine for internal fixation using frameless stereotactic guidance

OBJECT: Although transpedicular fixation is a biomechanically superior technique, it is not routinely used in the cervical spine. The risk of neurovascular injury in this region is considered high because the diameter of cervical pedicles is very small and their angle of insertion into the vertebral body varies. This study was conducted to analyze the clinical accuracy of stereotactically guided transpedicular screw insertion into the cervical spine. METHODS: Twenty-seven patients underwent posterior stabilization of the cervical spine for degenerative instability resulting from myelopathy, fracture/dislocation, tumor, rheumatoid arthritis, and pyogenic spondylitis. Fixation included 1-6 motion segments (mean 2.2 segments). Transpedicular screws (3.5-mm diameter) were placed using 1 of 2 computer-assisted guidance systems and lateral fluoroscopic control. The intraoperative mean deviation of frameless stereotaxy was < 1.9 mm for all procedures. RESULTS: No neurovascular complications resulted from screw insertion. Postoperative computed tomography (CT) scans revealed satisfactory positioning in 104 (90%) of 116 cervical pedicles and in all 12 thoracic pedicles. A noncritical lateral or inferior cortical breach was seen with 7 screws (6%). Critical malplacement (4%) was always lateral: 5 screws encroached into the vertebral artery foramen by 40-60% of its diameter; Doppler sonographic controls revealed no vascular compromise. Screw malplacement was mostly due to a small pedicle diameter that required a steep trajectory angle, which could not be achieved because of anatomical limitation in the exposure of the surgical field. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the use of frameless stereotaxy, there remains some risk of critical transpedicular screw malpositioning in the subaxial cervical spine. Results may be improved by the use of intraoperative CT scanning and navigated percutaneous screw insertion, which allow optimization of the transpedicular trajectory.     

X线透视与计算机导航系统引导颈椎椎弓根螺钉内固定技术的对比研究

目的对X线透视下和计算机导航系统引导下颈椎椎弓根螺钉内固定的精确性进行对比研究。方法X线透视引导下145枚和CT三维导航系统辅助下置入的159枚颈椎椎弓根螺钉,术后进行经椎弓根螺钉水平的CT平扫或术后c型臂透视3D重建,观察椎弓根螺钉置入的精确性。结果X线透视引导组螺钉置入满意率为91．7％,CT三维导航系统引导组螺钉置入满意率为97．5％,两组满意率有显著性差异（P〈0．05）。两组病例均未出现明显的神经血管损伤并发症。对其中20例病例进行了术中导航操作时间和导航精确性的监测,术中工具注册和参考点照合时间平均3．5min（2～8min）,位置误差率平均0．31mm（0．12～0．56mm）。每颗椎弓根螺钉定位针置入所需时间平均2min（1-3．5min）。术中只需进行两次C型臂透视印证螺钉定位针和螺钉置入的准确性。结论采用CT三维导航系统辅助,能显著提高椎弓根螺钉置入的精确性。     

A free‐hand technique for pedicle screw placement in the lower cervical spine

Objective: To describe a free‐hand method for pedicle screw placement in the lower cervical spine with no intraoperative imaging monitors, and to evaluate the safety of this technique. Methods: A study of the free‐hand technique of cervical pedicle screw placement was conducted by postoperative radiological review and follow‐up. Thirty‐six patients who had had cervical reconstruction with posterior plate utilizing pedicle screw fixation, and been followed for a minimum of 2 years, were studied. The position of the pedicle screw was evaluated by postoperative oblique radiographs and axial computed tomograms. Clinical outcomes were measured by Odem's criteria. Results: A total of 144 screws of diameter 3.5 or 4.0 mm were inserted into the cervical pedicles in 36 patients. Postoperative images showed that 16 (11.1%) of the screws had penetrated the pedicle walls. Among them, 10 (6.9%) screws had penetrated the lateral, 4 (2.8%) the superior and 2 (1.3%) the inferior walls. However, there were no neurological or vascular complications related to the malpositioned screws during a minimum of 2 years follow‐up. In addition, Odem's scores were applied postoperatively in all patients except one with complete neurological deficit. Conclusion: Based on 144 screw placements, cervical pedicle screw insertion utilizing a free‐hand technique without intraoperative imaging guidance seems to be safe and reliable. However, solid knowledge of the anatomy of the cervical pedicle and adjacent neurovascular bundles, and careful preoperative review of cervical images, are imperative for successful screw placement in the cervical spine.     

管道疏通法行颈椎弓根螺钉置入的研究

目的：通过解剖学测量及临床应用探讨“管道疏通法”（dredging pipe method,DPM)对提高颈椎弓根螺钉置入的成功率、安全性及可操作性方面的应用价值。方法：（1）颈椎骨测量：成人C3－C7干燥骨42套，共210块椎骨，在实体及CT片上，测量椎骨的相关参数；92）临床应用：颈椎失稳症患者32例，术前X线、CT测量，参照标本及患者影像测量数据和管道疏通器自动寻迹的原理，个体化设计各椎节的置钉方案。在直视下显露椎弓根管口及其管腔，确定置钉方向和位置，扩孔攻丝置钉。术后观察对比相应指标，评价置钉的位置、方向。结果：91）与DPM相关的国人颈椎实体测量数据与CT测量数据比较无显著性差异（P＞0．05）；6．67％（28／42）椎弓根的宽度小于4mm;(2)32例患者共置入颈椎弓根钉146枚，术后CT复查96枚钉，其中5枚螺钉穿破椎弓根骨皮质，成功率94．8％。未出现神经血管损伤病例。结论：（1）术前影像学测量结果可人为个体化设计手术方案的重要依据，采用DPM置钉技术实施经颈椎弓根钉内固定手术，具有直视下操作、置钉准备率高、可操作性强等特点；（2）解剖学测量表明，极少部分人（6．67％）的C3－C7的椎弓根宽度不适宜做椎弓根钉内固定。     

颈椎椎弓根螺钉徒手植入技术的临床研究

目的 评价颈椎椎弓根螺钉徒手植入技术（无须术中影像技术引导）的安全性和可靠性。方法应用Axis内固定系统（美国枢法模公司）对36例颈椎疾病患者进行颈后路经椎弓根内固定术，共植入螺钉144枚，方法如下：①术中清晰地显露颈椎侧块和突间关节，用直径3，0mm高速球形磨钻去除侧块外上象限处骨皮质，然后用2．0mm的自制手锥沿椎弓根事先确定的方向轻轻钻入，若遇阻力则需略改变方向，使其自然置入，深约2～2，5cm。确定无误后，则安置Axis钛板和置入长度合适的椎弓根螺钉。②安装完毕后，即用C型臂X线机作双斜位透视，无误后关闭切口。结果从G～G，共植入根弓根螺钉144枚，其中10枚（6．8％）钉初次置入后感觉松动，经校正后二次置入成功，11枚（3．5％）钉道钻孔后出血较多，但及时处理后出血停止并无不良结果。术后X线斜位片及CT片显示，16枚（11．1％）螺钉穿破椎弓根，其中10枚螺钉（6．9％）穿破椎弓根外侧皮质，4枚（2．8％）穿破椎弓根上侧皮质，2枚（1．3％）穿破椎弓根下侧皮质。随访未发现与螺钉置入穿破椎弓根皮质有关的神经血管损伤问题。结论本研究提示，在事先充分的对每个患者颈椎椎弓根X线及CT解剖结构了解的情况下，徒手置入椎弓根螺钉行颈椎后路内固定安全可行。     

Computed tomography assessment of lateral pedicle wall perforation by free-hand subaxial cervical pedicle screw placement

Purpose

To present the technique of free-hand subaxial cervical pedicle screw (CPS) placement without using intra-operative navigating devices, and to investigate the crucial factors for safe placement and avoidance of lateral pedicle wall perforation, by measuring and classifying perforations with postoperative computed tomography (CT) scan.

Summary of background data

The placement of CPS has generally been considered as technically demanding and associated with considerable lateral wall perforation rate. For surgeons without access to navigation systems, experience of safe free-hand technique for subaxial CPS placement is especially valuable.

Materials and methods

A total of 214 consecutive traumatic or degenerative patients with 1,024 CPS placement using the free-hand technique were enrolled. In the operative process, the lateral mass surface was decorticated. Then a small curette was used to identify the pedicle entrance by touching the cortical bone of the medial pedicle wall. It was crucial to keep the transverse angle and make appropriate adjustment with guidance of the resistance of the thick medial cortical bone. The hand drill should be redirected once soft tissue breach was palpated by a slim ball-tip prober. With proper trajectory, tapping, repeated palpation, the 26–30 mm screw could be placed. After the procedure, the transverse angle of CPS trajectory was measured, and perforation of the lateral wall was classified by CT scan: grade 1, perforation of pedicle wall by screw placement, with the external edge of screw deviating out of the lateral pedicle wall equal to or less than 2 mm and grade 2, critical perforation of pedicle wall by screw placement, large than 2 mm.

Results

A total of 129 screws (12.64 %) were demonstrated as lateral pedicle wall perforation, of which 101 screws (9.86 %) were classified as grade 1, whereas 28 screws (2.73 %) as grade 2. Among the segments involved, C3 showed an obviously higher perforating rate than other (P < 0.05). The difference between the anatomical pedicle transverse angle and the screw trajectory angle was higher in patients of grade 2 perforation than the others. In the 28 screws of grade 2 perforation verified by axial CT, 26 screws had been palpated as abnormal during operation. However, only 19 out of the 101 screws of grade 1 perforation had shown palpation alarming signs during operation. The average follow-up was 36.8 months (range 5–65 months). There was no symptom and sign of neurovascular injuries. Two screws (0.20 %) were broken, and one screw (0.10 %) loosen.

Conclusion

Placement of screw through a correct trajectory may lead to grade 1 perforation, which suggests transversal expansion and breakage of the thinner lateral cortex, probably caused by mismatching of the diameter of 3.5 mm screws and the tiny cancellous bone cavity of pedicle. Grade 1 perforation is deemed as relatively safe to the vertebral artery. Grade 2 perforation means obvious deviation of the trajectory angle of hand drill, which directly penetrates into the transverse foramen, and the risk of vertebral artery injury (VAI) or development of thrombi caused by the irregular blood flow would be much greater compared to grade 1 perforation. Moreover, there are two crucial maneuvers for increasing accuracy of screw placement: identifying the precise entry point using a curette or hand drill to touch the true entrance of the canal after decortication, and guiding CPS trajectory on axial plane by the resistant of thick medial wall.     

Placement of pedicle screws in the human cadaveric cervical spine: comparative accuracy of three techniques

STUDY DESIGN: This investigation was conducted in two parts. In the first part, a morphometric analysis of critical cervical pedicle dimensions were measured to create guidelines for cervical pedicle screw fixation based on posterior cervical topography. In the second part of the study, a human cadaver model was used to assess the accuracy and safety of transpedicular screw placement in the subaxial spine using three different surgical techniques: 1) using surface landmarks established in the first part of the study, 2) using supplemental visual and tactile cues provided by performing laminoforaminotomies, and 3) using a computer-assisted surgical guidance system. OBJECTIVE: To assess the accuracy of transpedicular screw placement in the cervical spine using three surgical techniques. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: A three-column fixation device implanted to secure an unstable cervical spine can be a valuable tool with a biomechanical advantage in the spine surgeon's armamentarium. Despite this advantage, concerns over surgical neurovascular complications have surfaced. Cadaver-based morphometric measurements used to guide the surgeon in the placement of a pedicle screw show significant variability, raising legitimate concerns as to whether transpedicular fixation can be applied safely. METHODS: Precise measurements of 14 human cadaveric cervical spines were made by two independent examiners of pedicle dimensions, angulation, and offset relative to the lateral mass boundaries. On the basis of this analysis, guidelines for pedicle screw placement relative to posterior cervical topography were derived. In the second part of the study, 12 human cadaveric cervical spines were instrumented with 3.5-mm screws placed in the pedicles C3-C7 according to one of three techniques. Cortical integrity and neurovascular injury were then assessed by obtaining postoperative computed tomography scans (1-mm cuts) of each specimen. Cortical breaches were classified into critical or noncritical breaches. RESULTS: Linear measurements of pedicle dimensions had a wide range of values with only fair interobservercorrelation. Angular measurements showed similarangulation in the transverse plane (40 degrees ) at each level. With respect to the sagittal plane, both C3 and C4 pedicles were oriented superiorly relative to the axis of the lateral mass, whereas the C6 and C7 pedicles were oriented inferiorly. The dorsal entry point of the pedicle on the lateral mass defined by transverse and sagittal offset had similar mean values with wide ranges, although there often was excellent correlation between observers. There were no significant interlevel, right/left, or male/female differences noted with respect to offset. Using one of three techniques, 120 pedicles were instrumented. In group 1 (morphometric data): 12.5% of the screws were placed entirely within the pedicle; 21.9% had a noncritical breach; and 65. 5% had a critical breach. In group 2 (laminoforaminotomy), 45% of the screws were within the pedicle; 15.4% had a noncritical breach; and 39.6% had a critical breach. In group 3 (computer-assisted surgical guidance system), 76% of the screws were entirely within the pedicle; 13.4% had a noncritical breach; and 10.6% had a critical breach. Regardless of the technique used, the vertebral artery was the structure most likely to be injured. CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of the morphometric data, guidelines for cervical spine pedicle screw placement at each subaxial level were derived. Although a statistical analysis of cadaveric morphometric data obtained from the cervical spine could provide guidelines for transpedicular screw placement based on topographic landmarks, sufficient variation exists to preclude safe instrumentation without additional anatomic data. Insufficient correlation between different surgeons' assessments of surface landmarks attests to the inadequacy of screw insertion techniques in the cervical spine based on such specific topographic guide     

颈椎经关节椎弓根螺钉固定与标准椎弓根螺钉固定的生物力学比较

目的 比较颈椎经关节椎弓根螺钉固定和标准椎弓根螺钉固定的拔出强度.方法 取10具新鲜尸体颈椎标本(C_3～T_1),游离成三个颈椎运动节段(C_(3,4),C_(5,6),C_7T_1).在椎体两侧随机进行经关节椎弓根螺钉固定或标准椎弓根螺钉固定,置入直径3.5 mm皮质骨螺钉.经关节椎弓根螺钉固定以上位椎骨侧块外下象限中点为进钉点,在直视椎弓根下,螺钉在冠状面内倾约45°、矢状面尾倾约50°.由上位椎骨下关节突经关节突关节、下位椎骨的椎弓根,进入下位椎骨的椎体内.标准椎弓根螺钉固定以侧块外上象限中点为进钉点,在直视椎弓根下,螺钉方向参考CT测量结果 ,尽量与椎弓根倾斜角度保持一致,在横断面上内倾约45°、矢状面上螺钉指向椎体的上1/3.在生物力学试验机上行拔出强度试验,比较两种螺钉固定的最大轴向拔出力.结果 颈椎经关节椎弓根螺钉固定平均最大轴向拨出力为(694±42)N,标准椎弓根螺钉固定为(670±36)N,两者比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).结论 颈椎后路经关节椎弓根螺钉固定的拔出强度大干标准椎弓根螺钉固定,从生物力学强度方面考虑经关节椎弓根螺钉固定可以作为标准椎弓根螺钉固定的一种补充方法.     

Thoracic pedicle screw placement guided by computed tomographic measurements.

Cadaveric pedicle screw placement guided by the measurements from axial computed tomography (CT) scans in the thoracic spine was assessed in this study. Axial CT scans were performed on four cadaveric thoracic spines, and the measurements included the pedicle transverse angle, inner pedicle width, and distance between the midline of the vertebra and the pedicle axis on the dorsal aspect of the lamina. With utilization of the data from CT scans, screws were directly placed into the thoracic pedicle from T1 to T10. Screw penetration of the pedicle was determined by gross examination. The results showed that the largest pedicle transverse angle was found at the levels of T1-2, and the smallest occurred at the T3 through T8 levels. The value of the pedicle inner width was quite different between specimens with a minimum of 3.0 mm at T4 and a maximum of 9.2 mm at T10. Gross examination of the pedicle showed that 13 (16.3%) of 80 screws penetrated the pedicle wall, with a Grade I penetration in 11 pedicles and a Grade II penetration in 2 pedicles. Screw penetration of the medial wall was found in four pedicles and penetration of the lateral wall was noted in nine pedicles. No screw penetration of the superior and inferior walls of the pedicle was identified in any of the four specimens. Thoracic pedicle screw placement guided by the measurements from axial CT scans significantly reduced the incidence of pedicle penetration. Axial CT measurements of the pedicle inner diameter and transverse angle as well as the starting point for screw insertion are recommended if pedicle screw fixation is intended in the thoracic spine.