Banff ’09 Meeting Report: Antibody Mediated Graft Deterioration and Implementation of Banff Working Groups

The 10th Banff Conference on Allograft Pathology was held in Banff, Canada from August 9 to 14, 2009. A total of 263 transplant clinicians, pathologists, surgeons, immunologists and researchers discussed several aspects of solid organ transplants with a special focus on antibody mediated graft injury. The willingness of the Banff process to adapt continuously in response to new research and improve potential weaknesses, led to the implementation of six working groups on the following areas: isolated v‐lesion, fibrosis scoring, glomerular lesions, molecular pathology, polyomavirus nephropathy and quality assurance. Banff working groups will conduct multicenter trials to evaluate the clinical relevance, practical feasibility and reproducibility of potential changes to the Banff classification. There were also sessions on quality improvement in biopsy reading and utilization of virtual microscopy for maintaining competence in transplant biopsy interpretation. In addition, compelling molecular research data led to the discussion of incorporation of omics‐technologies and discovery of new tissue markers with the goal of combining histopathology and molecular parameters within the Banff working classification in the near future.     

The Banff 2007 Working Classification of Skin-Containing Composite Tissue Allograft Pathology

Composite tissue allotransplantation (CTA) is a recently introduced option for limb replacement and reconstruction of tissue defects. As with other allografts, CTA can undergo immune-mediated rejection; therefore standardized criteria are required for characterizing and reporting severity and types of rejection. This article documents the conclusions of a symposium on CTA rejection held at the Ninth Banff Conference on Allograft Pathology in La-Coruňa, Spain, on 26 June 2007, and proposes a working classification, the Banff CTA-07, for the categorization of CTA rejection. This classification was derived from a consensus discussion session attended by the first authors of three published classification systems, pathologists and researchers from international centers where clinical CTA has been performed. It was open to all attendees to the Banff conference. To the extent possible, the format followed the established National Institutes of Health (NIH) guidelines on Consensus Development Programs. By consensus, the defining features to diagnose acute skin rejection include inflammatory cell infiltration with involvement of epidermis and/or adnexal structures, epithelial apoptosis, dyskeratosis and necrosis. Five grades of severity of rejection are defined. This classification refines proposed schemas, represents international consensus on this topic, and establishes a working collective classification system for CTA reporting of rejection in skin-containing CTAs.     

Renal allograft biopsies in the era of C4d staining: the need for change in the Banff classification system.

C4d immunostaining in the peritubular capillaries (PTC) is a marker of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). We evaluated the histopathologic diagnoses of 388 renal transplant biopsies since the implementation of routine C4d immunostaining at our center. Of these, 155 (40%) biopsies had evidence of acute cellular rejection (ACR), out of which 119 (77%) had pure ACR, 31 (20%) had ACR with concomitant features of AMR, and five (3%) had ACR with focal C4d staining. Sixty-four (16%) biopsies exhibited features of AMR [33 (52%) pure AMR, and 31(48%) concomitant AMR and ACR]. One hundred and fifty-five (40%) biopsies had features of interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (IFTA). Of these, 20 (13%) had concomitant AMR [13 (8.5%) had pure AMR and seven (4.5%) had concomitant ACR and AMR]. Creatinine at the time of biopsy was higher in patients with mixed ACR and AMR and the clinical behavior of mixed lesions is more aggressive over time. Despite having a lower serum creatinine at the time of biopsy, patients with IFTA experienced gradual decline in graft function over time. The pathologic findings in renal allograft biopsies are often mixed and mixed lesions appear to have more aggressive clinical behavior. These findings suggest the need for change in the Banff classification system to better capture the complexity of renal allograft pathologies.     

Banff 2011 Meeting Report: New Concepts in Antibody‐Mediated Rejection

The 11th Banff meeting was held in Paris, France, from June 5 to 10, 2011, with a focus on refining diagnostic criteria for antibody‐mediated rejection (ABMR). The major outcome was the acknowledgment of C4d‐negative ABMR in kidney transplants. Diagnostic criteria for ABMR have also been revisited in other types of transplants. It was recognized that ABMR is associated with heterogeneous phenotypes even within the same type of transplant. This highlights the necessity of further refining the respective diagnostic criteria, and is of particular significance for the design of randomized clinical trials. A reliable phenotyping will allow for definition of robust end‐points. To address this unmet need and to allow for an evidence‐based refinement of the Banff classification, Banff Working Groups presented multicenter data regarding the reproducibility of features relevant to the diagnosis of ABMR. However, the consensus was that more data are necessary and further Banff Working Group activities were initiated. A new Banff working group was created to define diagnostic criteria for ABMR in kidneys independent of C4d. Results are expected to be presented at the 12th Banff meeting to be held in 2013 in Brazil. No change to the Banff classification occurred in 2011.     

Role of CXCR3 in cellular but not humoral renal allograft rejection

CXCR3, a chemokine receptor mainly expressed by T cells, is involved in animal transplant models and in human allograft rejection. CXCR3 expression was localized in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded renal allograft biopsies without signs of rejection (C4d-negative, Banff 0, n = 16), with C4d deposits as a sign of humoral rejection (C4d-positive, Banff 0, n = 8), with cellular rejection (C4d-negative, Banff I, n = 7) and with signs of both cellular and humoral rejection (C4d-positive, Banff 1, n = 5). Small, round infiltrating cells were CXCR3-positive. A high number of these cells was present in biopsies with cellular rejection (independent of C4d deposition). CXCR3-positive cells diffusely infiltrated the interstitium, including the tubular epithelium (tubulitis). CXCR3 scores and the area of CXCR3 staining were significantly higher in cellular rejection, when compared to biopsies without rejection, and with deposition of C4d alone. CXCR3-positive cells infiltrate renal allografts during cellular rejection, whereas C4d deposition is not associated with the recruitment of these cells.     

Banff 2003 Meeting Report: New Diagnostic Insights and Standards

The Seventh Banff Conference on Allograft Pathology was held June 14-18, 2003 in Aberdeen, Scotland representing the latest iteration of the international consensus meeting, which develops worldwide standards for interpretation of allograft biopsies. The meeting is an important force behind standardized slide interpretation to strengthen endpoints in international clinical trials. Of participants polled 87% reported that they would alter clinical practice as a direct consequence of the meeting and its content. Advances were made in many areas including tubulitis mechanisms, real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) gene analysis and microarrays in rejection diagnosis, tolerance/accommodation/immunomodulation, the role of monocytes and macrophages in rejection and C4d as a marker for antibody-mediated rejection. A provisional scoring system for peritubular capillary inflammatory cell accumulation in antibody-mediated rejection was presented for testing, as well as plans for a nephrectomy study to determine specificity of vascular lesions of rejection. Future meetings are planned for 2005 (Edmonton), 2007 and 2009, with active ongoing Internet discussion between meetings.     

Chronic allograft nephropathy--biopsy findings and outcome.

BACKGROUND: Chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) is a composite term for various types of damage to a kidney transplant. We wanted to analyse its components in relation to baseline biopsy findings, transplant function, and outcome. METHODS: Among renal transplantations performed from 1985 to 1997, 156 were identified where allograft biopsies had been obtained on clinical indication 6 months after transplantation or later, baseline biopsies were available in each case and the patient's original disease was known. Time after transplantation was median 2.2 years (range 0.5-13). The biopsies were reviewed and the Banff 1997 CAN score obtained. RESULTS: All but one late biopsy showed some CAN grade, 48% grade II, and 7.5% grade III. Acute tubulointerstitial rejection was seen in 9% but vascular rejection in only 3%. Arterial wall thickening was present in 66% of the late biopsies, correlated with donor age and its presence at baseline but also with time after transplantation. The Banff CAN score and serum creatinine level were both independent predictors of further graft survival, relative risk 0.35 (confidence interval 0.15-0.82, P=0.015) for CAN grade I vs III and 0.30 (0.14-0.67, P=0.003) for serum creatinine <170 vs >250 micromol/l. Presence of arterial wall thickening had no prognostic impact. CONCLUSION: The CAN grade is predictive of further graft survival independently of the serum creatinine level. Interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy are more prominent features of chronic graft damage than vascular rejection. Unspecific arterial wall thickening is partly dependent on baseline conditions and lacks prognostic impact in this late stage.     

Peritubular capillaritis in early renal allograft is associated with the development of chronic rejection and chronic allograft nephropathy

Abstract:  Peritubular capillaritis (PTCitis) has been recognized as one form of acute/active allograft rejection, and its relation to humoral immunity has been suggested. However, its mechanisms remain to be fully clarified, and there are no criteria for evaluating the extent of PTCitis in a biopsied allograft. In this study, we first evaluated the extent of PTCitis in early allografts in patients presenting with acute cellular rejection (ACR) and antibody-mediated rejection (AbAR). We also included patients who showed no evidence of ACR and/or AbAR. Next, we investigated whether or not PTCitis persisted and if peritubular capillary basement membrane (PTCBM) thickening was present in their follow-up biopsy specimens. We adopted the scoring system of PTCitis, which was presented at the Seventh Banff Conference on Allograft Pathology in 2003. In total, 53 patients were included in this study. At first biopsy, 17 showed ACR, eight showed AbAR, 16 showed mild PTCitis only, and 14 were without significant pathologic changes. The PTC score was the highest in the AbAR group, and in some patients the score gradually increased during the follow-up period. Similar changes were also observed in the group with mild PTCitis only. In late allografts, half of the patients with AbAR developed chronic rejection (CR), and the PTCBM score was the highest in that group. Surprisingly, CR was present in more than 30% of patients without ACR and/or AbAR but mild PTCitis only. In the control group, only a few showed CR and/or chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN). In conclusion, it became clear that we should carefully monitor for mild PTCitis in early allografts. In addition, our data also proved the usefulness of the PTC score and PTCBM score.     

Clinical and pathological assessment of acute vascular rejection in the transplant kidney

Koike J, Yamaguchi Y, Horita S, Tanabe K, Fuchinoue S, Toma H, Nihei H. Clinical and pathological assessment of acute vascular rejection in the transplant kidney. Clin Transplantation 2001: 15 (Supplement 5): 41–44. ©Munksgaard, 2001
Acute vascular rejection (AVR) in kidney transplan- tation is the most important factor influencing graft prognosis. We focus on patients whose grafts were lost because of AVR, and assessed their clinical characteristics and histological findings of biopsied renal grafts. Biopsied specimens exhibited AVR in 43 patients who underwent kidney transplantation in the Kidney Center of Tokyo Women's Medical University from 1995 to 1999. In the follow-up from 1 to 5 yr (median: 2.5 yr) we classified these patients into three groups: favourable prog- nosis group (FPG), relatively poor prognosis group (RPPG) and poor prognosis group (PPG). Light microscopic study for histological grading of acute rejection according to the Banff scheme and detection of the C4d complement deposition on peritubular capillaries by the immunofluorescence method were performed. Based on the results, the donors of RPPG and PPG were significantly older than those of FPG, and all factors of acute rejection according to the Banff scheme were not statistically significantly different among the three groups. However, an acute tubular injury mimicking acute tubular necrosis (ATN) was observed in the biopsy specimens from PPG. In conclusion, an older donor is a risk factor of poor prognosis of the graft with AVR, and acute tubular injury mimicking ATN is one of the important features that enables the prediction of graft failure originating from AVR in kidney transplantation.     

Reproducibility of the Banff classification in subclinical kidney transplant rejection

The Banff classification for kidney allograft pathology has proved to be reproducible, but its inter and intraobserver agreement can vary substantially among centres. The aim of this study was to evaluate Banff reproducibility of surveillance renal allograft biopsies among renal pathologists from different transplant centres. This study included 32 renal transplant patients with stable graft function. Biopsies were performed 2 and 12 months post-transplant. Histology was interpreted according to the Banff schema by three renal pathologists, and inter and intraobserver agreement were measured. The best reproducibility was obtained for the presence or absence of acute rejection (AR), with kappa values ranging from moderate (kappa = 0.47; p = 0.006) to good (kappa = 0.72; p = 0.0001). However, the agreement for 'suspicious for AR' category was poor between all observers. For scoring and grading interstitial inflammation and intimal arteritis the agreement were poor and moderate, respectively. Reproducibility for the presence or absence of chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) was heterogeneous, ranging from poor (kappa = 0.13; p = NS) to moderate (kappa = 0.56; p = 0.007). Scoring chronic changes such as fibrous intimal thickening gave a reasonable interobserver agreement. Intraobserver reproducibility was good for presence or absence of AR, but was poor for the diagnosis of CAN. In conclusion, histologic analysis of stable renal allografts based on Banff criteria showed a good agreement for the diagnosis of AR and a reasonable kappa for CAN, but reproducibility for scoring and grading showed a substantial interobserver variation.