Development and validation of a low-cost laparoscopic simulation box

IntroductionThe acquisition of laparoscopic technique skills in an operating room is conditioned by the expertise of the tutor and the number of training interventions by the trainee. For students and surgeons to use a laparoscopic simulator to train their skills, it must be validated beforehand.MethodsA laparoscopic simulator box was designed, along with 6 interchangeable training games. The simulator was validated by a group of 19 experts, physicians with an experience from at least 100 laparoscopic surgeries, and 20 students of 4^th to 6^th grades of medical school (non-experts). To evaluate its construct validity, time-to-completion and the number of successfully completed games were assessed. We used 11 and 9-item questionnaires to gather information on content and face validity respectively. In both questionnaires, answers were collected through Likert-type scales, scored from 1 to 5.ResultsThe group of experts required less time and successfully completed more games than the group of non-experts (p < 0.01). The group of non-experts gave a score ≥ 4 points on each of the questions regarding the content validity of the tool, however, the experts rated with a significant lower mean score the need for the simulator to learn the surgical technique (3.68 points; p < 0.01). Regarding the face validity, all items were graded with a score ≥ 4 points except for the question relating to the spatial realism (3.82 points).ConclusionThe laparoscopy simulation box and the games were valid means for training surgeons and medical students to develop the skills required for the laparoscopic technique.     

Canadian consensus conference on the development of training and practice standards in advanced minimally invasive surgery: Edmonton,Alta., Jun. 1, 2007

Despite the complexities of minimally invasive surgery (MIS), a Canadian approach to training surgeons in this field does not exist. Whereas a limited number of surgeons are fellowship-trained in the specialty, guidelines are still clearly needed to implement advanced MIS. Leaders in the field of gastrointestinal surgery and MIS attended a consensus conference where they proposed a comprehensive mentoring program that may evolve into a framework for a national mentoring and training system. Leadership and commitment from national experts to define the most appropriate template for introducing new surgical techniques into practice is required. This national framework should also provide flexibility for truly novel procedures such as natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery.     

Outcomes and influences of rural-focused integrated clerkship programs in general surgery

BackgroundA shortage of general surgeons is predicted in the future, with particular impact on rural surgery. This is an exploratory analysis on a rural-focused longitudinal integrated clerkship to determine if such clerkships can be used to increase interest and recruitment in rural general surgery.MethodsAn institutional database was reviewed to identify students who became general surgeons after completing a rural-focused longitudinal integrated clerkship. Telephone interviews were conducted on a portion of these surgeons.ResultsFifty-seven students (3.6%) completing the rural-focused longitudinal integrated clerkship became general surgeons. Of those participating in phone interviews, most (90%) decided to become surgeons during their experience while all stated that preclinical years did not influence their specialty decision.ConclusionsA substantial portion of these surgeons went on to practice in rural communities. Pre-existing rural and primary care-focused education could help to address the future projected shortage of rural general surgeons.     

Thromboprophylaxis practice patterns and beliefs among physicians treating patients with abdominopelvic cancers at a Canadian centre

BackgroundThere is inadequate high-quality evidence on thromboprophylaxis for patients undergoing surgery for abdominopelvic cancer. We surveyed physicians who treat patients with abdominopelvic cancer to determine current thromboprophylaxis practice patterns and to determine where research is needed.MethodsWe created an online survey with questions on thromboprophylaxis topics, including type of thromboprophylaxis used, timing of initial thromboprophylaxis dose, use of thromboprophylaxis during chemotherapy, use of extended-duration thromboprophylaxis and areas for future research. The survey questions were reviewed by external content experts to ensure they were appropriate and relevant. Surgeons, thrombosis experts and medical oncologists who manage patients with abdominopelvic cancers at 1 large Canadian academic centre were invited to complete the survey between January and April 2019.ResultsOf the 57 physicians invited, 42 (74%) completed the survey, including 27 surgeons (response rate 79%), 9 thrombosis experts (response rate 75%) and 6 medical oncologists (response rate 55%). Most surgeons (22 [82%]) reported using mechanical thromboprophylaxis, whereas only 1 thrombosis expert (11%) recommended mechanical thromboprophylaxis. There was substantial variability in the timing of the initial dose of thromboprophylaxis, with 9/10 urologists (90%) and all 7 general surgeons giving the first dose intraoperatively, and three-quarters of thoracic surgeons (3/4 [75%]), gynecologists (3/4 [75%]) and thrombosis experts (7/9 [78%]) starting thromboprophylaxis after surgery. All medical oncologists believed chemotherapy increases the risk of venous thromboembolism, but 4 (67%) reported that they do not routinely prescribe thromboprophylaxis owing to bleeding concerns. Most respondents (35/38 [92%]) felt there was a need for more research on thromboprophylaxis and indicated willingness to participate in future clinical trials.ConclusionVariability exists in contemporary thromboprophylaxis practice patterns among physicians treating patients with abdominopelvic cancer. Future research is needed to standardize care and improve outcomes for patients.     

Equatorial sub-Tenon blocks: Animal model training

Background and objectiveSub-Tenon's blocks (STB) provide effective operating conditions for ophthalmic surgery. Originally performed by surgeons STB are now increasingly administered by anaesthetists in the UK. STB requires expertise in handling surgical instruments. The traditional way of gaining expertise used to be by practicing on the patients, this is no longer advisable, or desirable.Materials and methodsThis article describes an animal eye model, equipment and teaching process for STB that the author has set up in a wet lab setting at Birmingham and Midland Eye Centre. Advantages and disadvantages of other methods of animal and non animal simulation are discussed.ResultsThe trainees acquire bi-manual dexterity and develop confidence through hands-on practice on the animal eye before proceeding to perform the procedure on the patients.ConclusionThe isolated pig eye animal model is a practical, inexpensive and reproducible method of teaching novice trainees in performing sub-Tenon blocks. The training is the first of its kind in the UK, and is highly successful.     

Behaviour and knowledge skill levels of orthopedic surgeons about radiation safety and fluoroscopy use: A survey analysis

ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to evaluate the behaviour and knowledge skill levels of Turkish orthopedic surgeons about fluoroscopy usage and radiation safety.MethodsThe questionnaire, consisting of nineteen questions, was sent to orthopaedic surgeons and requested by a total of 323 surgeons online. The questions were about personal information, training and behaviours related to radiation and fluoroscopy usage, and the use of protective equipment.ResultsA total of 277 individuals completed the questionnaire. The answers of 180 surgeons whose working duration was more than 1 year and also who participated in at least one fluoroscopy requiring operation per week, were analysed. 22 (12%) participants answered that they were trained on fluoroscopy usage. Sixty people (33.3%) reported that they did not use any protective equipment regularly. The most commonly used protection methods were lead aprons 123 (68.3%). Thyroid protectors were used by 92 participants (52.1%). There was no significant difference between the groups when comparing the use of protective equipment according to the academic title. Only 19 (10.6%) of the surgeons noted that they used dosimeter regularly, and 15 (83.3%) of them reported that they controlled their dosimeters.ConclusionIn this study, Orthopedic surgeons were found not to be adequately trained about use and risks of fluoroscopy and also not to be equipped about methods for preventing radiation damage.     

Canadian Pediatric Surgeon Workforce: Characterization of Training,Trends Over Time,and 10-year Model for Pediatric Surgery Need

BackgroundGraduate and fellowship training trends for Canadian pediatric surgeons remain uncharacterized. Similarly, updated workforce planning for pediatric surgeons is required. We aimed to characterize graduate degree and fellowship trends for Canadian pediatric surgeons, with modelling to inform workforce planning.MethodsWe performed a cross sectional observational study evaluating Canadian pediatric surgeons in January 2022. Surgeon demographics collected included year of medical degree (MD) conferment, MD location, fellowship location, and graduate degree achievement. Our primary outcome was to evaluate training characteristics over time. Secondary outcomes evaluated surgeon supply and demand from 2021 to 2031. Supply was extrapolated from current Canadian pediatric surgery fellows assuming static fellowship matriculation, while retirement was estimated using a 31-, 36-, or 41-year career following MD conferral.ResultsOf included surgeons (n = 77), 64 (83%) completed fellowship training in Canada and 46 (60%) have graduate degrees. No surgeons graduating ≤1980 hold graduate degrees, compared to 8 (100%) surgeons with MD ≥ 2011 (p < 0.001). Similarly, more surgeons with MD ≥ 2011 appear to have a Canadian MD (n = 7, 87.5%) and Canadian fellowship (n = 8, 100%). Modelling predicts that 19–49 (25%–64%) surgeons will retire between 2021 and 2031, while 37 fellows will graduate with intention to work in Canada, creating between a 12 surgeon deficit up to an 18 surgeon surplus depending on career length.ConclusionsTrends in graduate degree achievement and fellowship location suggest increasing competition for Canadian pediatric surgery positions. Additionally, a substantial number of Canadian-trained fellows will need positions outside of Canada in the next decade. Overall, results support previous work demonstrating saturation of the Canadian pediatric workforce.Level of EvidenceLevel IV.ACGME Competency AddressedMedical Knowledge.     

An evaluation of stereoacuity (3D vision) in practising surgeons across a range of surgical specialities

BackgroundJudging depth is important in surgery. Although there are several cues that permit depth perception, stereoacuity has been singled out as a possible predictor of surgical ability. However, it is not clear whether high-grade stereoacuity is necessary for a career in surgery. To help answer this, we aimed to evaluate stereoacuities in practising surgeons across a range of surgical specialities.MethodsWe recorded stereoacuity values on 66 surgeons working at a London teaching hospital using three standard stereotests: Titmus, TNO and Frisby. There were 36 Trainees and 30 Consultants, covering 12 surgical specialities.ResultsMedian stereoacuities (with range) for the whole group were: 40 s arc on Titmus (40–800), 30 s arc on TNO (15–480) and 20 s arc on Frisby (20–600). Four surgeons had no recordable stereoacuity on TNO, and one was also unrecordable on Titmus. Three of these four were Consultants. Depending on the test used, high-grade stereopsis was found in 74%–83% of surgeons while reduced stereopsis was found in 2%–14% of surgeons.ConclusionWhile we found that most surgeons in current NHS practice have high-grade stereoacuity, there are also surgeons with reduced stereopsis and some with no stereopsis. The findings do not therefore support the assertion that high-grade stereopsis is a universal requirement for a career in surgery. It would be difficult to justify setting a stereoacuity criterion for entrance into a surgical training programme.     

Identifying potentially avoidable femoral to popliteal expanded polytetrafluoroethylene bypass for claudication using cross-site blinded peer review

ObjectiveThe surgical treatment of claudication can be associated with significant morbidity and costs. There are growing concerns that some patients proceed to interventions without first attempting evidence-based nonoperative management. We used a direct, cross-site, blinded expert review to evaluate the appropriateness of the surgical treatment of claudication.MethodsWe enlisted practicing vascular surgeons to perform retrospective clinical assessments of lower extremity bypass procedures in a statewide clinical registry. Cases were limited to elective, open, infrainguinal bypasses performed for claudication using prosthetic grafts. Reviewing surgeons were randomly assigned 10 cases from a sample of 139 anonymized bypass operations and instructed to evaluate procedural appropriateness based on their expert opinion and evidence-based guidelines for preoperative treatment, namely, antiplatelet, statin, cilostazol, exercise, and smoking cessation therapy as documented in the medical record. Ninety-day episode payments were estimated from a distinct but similar cohort of patients undergoing lower extremity bypass for claudication.ResultsOf 325 total reviews, surgeons stated they would not have recommended bypass in 134 reviews (41%) and deemed bypass inappropriate in 122 reviews (38%). The most common reason for inappropriateness was lack of preoperative medical and lifestyle therapy, which was present in 63% of reviews where bypass was deemed appropriate and 39% of reviews where bypass was deemed inappropriate (P < .001). Surgeons stated they would have recommended additional preoperative therapy in 65% of reviews where bypass was deemed inappropriate and 35% of reviews where bypass was deemed appropriate (P < .001). The mean total episode payments in a similar cohort of 1458 patients undergoing elective open lower extremity bypass for claudication were $31,301 ± $21,219. Extrapolating to the 325 reviews, the 134 reviews in which surgeons would not have recommended bypass were associated with potentially avoidable estimated total payments of $4,194,334, and the 122 reviews in which bypass was deemed inappropriate were associated with potentially avoidable estimated total payments of $3,818,722.ConclusionsIn this cross-site expert peer review study, 40% of lower extremity bypasses were deemed premature and, therefore, potentially avoidable, primarily owing to a lack of medical and lifestyle management before surgery. Reviews deemed inappropriate were associated with approximately $4 million in potentially avoidable costs. This approach could inform performance feedback among surgeons to help align clinical practice with evidence-based recommendations for the treatment of claudication.     

A surgical virtual reality simulator distinguishes between expert gynecologic laparoscopic surgeons and perinatologists

Background:Concern regarding the quality of surgical training in obstetrics and gynecology residency programs is focusing attention on competency based education. Because open surgical skills cannot necessarily be translated into laparoscopic skills and with minimally invasive surgery becoming standard in operative gynecology, the discrepancy in training between obstetrics and gynecology will widen. Training on surgical simulators with virtual reality may improve surgical skills. However, before incorporation into training programs for gynecology residents the validity of such instruments needs to first be established. We sought to prove the construct validity of a virtual reality laparoscopic simulator, the SurgicalSim^TM, by showing its ability to distinguish between surgeons with different laparoscopic experience.Methods:Eleven gynecologic surgeons (experts) and 11 perinatologists (controls) completed 3 tasks on the simulator, and 10 performance parameters were compared.Results:The experts performed faster, more efficiently, and with fewer errors, proving the construct validity of the SurgicalSim.Conclusions:Laparoscopic virtual reality simulators can measure relevant surgical skills and so distinguish between subjects having different skill levels. Hence, these simulators could be integrated into gynecology resident endoscopic training and utilized for objective assessment. Second, the skills required for competency in obstetrics cannot necessarily be utilized for better performance in laparoscopic gynecology.     

Bariatric surgery practice patterns among pediatric surgeons in the United States

BackgroundMetabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) in adolescents has been shown to be safe and effective, but current practice patterns are variable and poorly understood. The aim of this study is to assess current MBS practice patterns among pediatric surgeons in the United States.MethodsAmerican Pediatric Surgical Association members were surveyed on current bariatric surgery practices.ResultsFour hundred and three (40%) surgeons out of a total of 1013 pediatric surgeons responded to the survey. Only 2 respondents had additional training in MBS (0.5%). One hundred thirty-two (32.6%) report that their practice participates in metabolic and bariatric surgery, with 123 (30.4%) having a specific partner specializing in MBS. Most respondents (92%) stated that they believe high volume is associated with better outcomes with regard to MBS. Only 17 (4.2%) surgeons performed a metabolic and bariatric surgery in the last year. All routinely perform sleeve gastrectomy as their primary procedure. Most (82%) perform procedures with an additional surgeon, either another pediatric surgeon (47%) or an adult bariatric surgeon (47%). All pediatric bariatric surgeons responded that they believe high volume led to better outcomes. Adolescent MBS programs most commonly included pediatric nutritionists (94%), pediatric psychologists (94%), clinical nurses (71%), clinical coordinators (59%), pediatric endocrinologists (59%), and exercise physiologists (52%).ConclusionOnly 17 (4.2%) respondents had performed a metabolic and bariatric surgery in the past year, and few of those had additional training in MBS. Future work is necessary to better understand optimal practice patterns for adolescent metabolic and bariatric surgery.Type of studyReview article.Level of evidenceLevel III.     

Oncoplastic techniques: Attitudes and changing practice amongst breast and plastic surgeons in Great Britain

PurposeThe availability, acceptability and practice of oncoplastic surgery has increased over the last 5 years. This study aims to describe how the breast and plastic surgical workforce has adapted to provide oncoplastic breast surgery.MethodsA questionnaire was distributed to members of the Association of Breast Surgery and BAPRAS, and results compared to a survey completed in 2010.ResultsIn 2010, 228 respondents completed the survey compared to 237 in 2015, of whom 204 were consultants (105 General or Breast Surgeons and 99 Plastic Surgeons). The range of procedures performed by Plastic Surgeons has remained static, the General and Breast Surgeons are performing proportionally more therapeutic mammaplasty (p < 0.001), breast reduction/mastopexy, and latissimus dorsi reconstructions. In 2015, surgeons are less concerned about the risks of lipomodelling than in 2010, with an increase the proportion of breast (55% vs. 26%) and plastic (91% vs. 58%) surgeons performing the technique.DiscussionSpecific concerns about oncoplastic surgery have decreased over the last five years, with a greater proportion of surgeons performing oncoplastic surgery including lipomodelling. The majority of breast surgeons in 2015 remain interested in further training in oncoplastic techniques (75%) but over the last 5 years, plastic surgeons interest in further training in oncoplastic surgery has dropped from 62% to 27%. About half of all breast and plastic surgeons felt that oncoplastic surgery should be available for all women and oncological and wound healing concerns had significantly reduced between 2010 and 2015 (p < 0.05).     

Impact of advanced clinical fellowship training on future research productivity and career advancement in adult cardiac surgery

BackgroundAdvanced clinical fellowships are important for training surgeons with a niche expertise. Whether this additional training impacts future academic achievement, however, remains unknown. Here, we investigated the impact of advanced fellowship training on research productivity and career advancement among active, academic cardiac surgeons. We hypothesized that advanced fellowships do not significantly boost future academic achievement.MethodsUsing online sources (eg, department webpages, CTSNet, Scopus, Grantome), we studied adult cardiac surgeons who are current faculty at accredited United States cardiothoracic surgery training programs, and who have practiced only at United States academic centers since 1986 (n = 227). Publicly available data regarding career advancement, research productivity, and grant funding were collected. Data are expressed as counts or medians.ResultsIn our study, 78 (34.4%) surgeons completed an advanced clinical fellowship, and 149 (65.6%) did not. Surgeons who pursued an advanced fellowship spent more time focused on surgical training (P < .0001), and those who did not were more likely to have completed a dedicated research fellowship (P = .0482). Both groups exhibited similar cumulative total publications (P = .6862), H-index (P = .6232), frequency of National Institutes of Health grant funding (P = .8708), and time to achieve full professor rank (P = .7099). After stratification by current academic rank, or by whether surgeons pursued a dedicated research fellowship, completion of an advanced clinical fellowship was not associated with increased research productivity or accelerated career advancement.ConclusionAcademic adult cardiac surgeons who pursue advanced clinical fellowships exhibit similar research productivity and similar career advancement as those who do not pursue additional clinical training.     

Who Should Be Doing Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery?

Background: The training and credentialing of surgeons for laparoscopic bariatric surgery is controversial. We sought to determine if there is an association between surgeons' practice and choice of open or laparoscopic bariatric surgery. Methods: Members of the ASBS were surveyed via email. Associations were tested with Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel or Pearson's chi-square. Results: 104/472 members responded; 65% were in private practice; 47% did 1-5 operations/week, 48% offered open procedures only, and 76% undertook gastric bypass. Respondents believe that laparoscopic procedures: should mimic open ones (77%), are safe (63%), should be evaluated by clinical trials (48%), and that expertise in bariatric surgery is more important than laparoscopic experience. 75% believe that courses and preceptorships are important. Regarding laparoscopic operations, surgeons doing only open procedures believe that: 1) the ASBS should be the main credentialing body; 2) surgeons should do >25 open before laparoscopic ones; and 3) clinical trials are needed (P<0.02, all). Surgeons with laparoscopic training or practices believe that laparoscopic surgery is safe and effective (P<0.002). Both laparoscopic and open surgeons believe bariatric surgeons should be the only surgeons doing laparoscopic bariatric procedures (P<0.008). Conclusions:There is consensus that laparoscopic bariatric surgery should be undertaken only by surgeons with strong interest in bariatric surgery. Laparoscopic bariatric surgeons should incorporate lessons learned from open surgery. Both laparoscopic and open bariatric surgeons should seek added expertise via courses and preceptorships.The skepticism of surgeons with 'open' practices could be addressed by clinical trials. The ASBS should maintain its leadership position and foster emerging technologies.     

Lessons learned from the experience of visceral military surgeons in the French role 3 Medical Treatment Facility of Kabul (Afghanistan): an extended skill mix required

ObjectiveTo evaluate the activity of visceral surgeons assigned to the Medical Treatment Facility (MTF) (role 3) in Kabul International Airport (KAIA) and identify the skills and qualifications required by these specialists.Patients and methodsBetween July 2009 and December 2010, all the patients operated by the visceral surgeons were eligible for inclusion in this study. They were International Security and Assistance Force (ISAF), Afghan National Security Forces (ANSF) soldiers, non-afghan civilians personnel and local nationals (LNs). They sustained war-related injuries, non-war related trauma emergencies, non-trauma related emergencies or had elective surgical care. The mechanisms and types of injuries, the affected organs and the surgical procedures were collected.ResultsOver the period of study, the visceral surgeons treated 261 over 971 patients (26.9%) achieving a total of 438 surgical procedures. Thirty one percent of these procedures were war-related, 26% non-war related, 24.2% non-trauma related emergencies and 18.1% elective surgery. Non-trauma related emergencies and elective surgery required the same skills as in civilian practice. War-related injuries and non-war related trauma emergencies were more challenging. Combined injuries represented 56% of the cases requiring damage control resuscitation procedures and/or treatment of severe burns. Life-threatening thoracic or vascular injuries (30%) required life-saving emergency surgical procedures.ConclusionA visceral surgeon in a role 3 MTF should master a wide range of skills and expertise to be able to deal with many complex situations, in particular life-threatening situations such as thoracic and vascular wounds. A comprehensive surgical training programme for surgeons in abroad deployment (Advance Course for Deployment Surgery – CACHIRMEX) has been designed and settled up in 2007 to provide these necessary skills. The feedback obtained from each previous deployment demonstrates that the advanced course for deployment surgery provides visceral surgeons the necessary skills required to deliver surgical healthcare in a role 3 MTF. However, a regular assessment of this programme is mandatory to ensure that this training stays appropriate and contributes to better outcomes and a decreased mortality rate.     

Analysis of a survey on orthopaedic residency training for fracture treatment in Korea

IntroductionFracture surgery is the most frequently performed orthopaedic procedure and is considered an essential surgical procedure for orthopaedic surgeons in general. Although the approach and circumstances of orthopaedic residency training for fracture treatment may differ between countries, the goals of training, which is to educate the residents regarding the principles of the fracture treatment and foster conscientious orthopaedic specialists, remain unchanged. Thus, the aim of the this study was to determine a desirable course of orthopaedic residency training by investigating and analysing the reality of training associated with fracture surgery and treatment during the orthopaedic residency of 4th year orthopaedic residents in Korea.MethodsUsing a questionnaire survey, a one-on-one interview was proposed to 266 applicants following the secondary board examination of residents who had completed the orthopaedic residency training course; the survey was conducted on January 19, 2016. Responses from 152 applicants (response rate: 57%) who accepted to participate in the survey were statistically analysed.ResultsDuring residency training, clinicians underwent fracture-related training for 3.5 h on average per month. Training consisted of various approaches and included lectures by professors, case briefings, textbook reading, and field training in an operating room. The residents largely differed in terms of experience in conducting fracture surgery: 47 (31%) responded that they had never performed fracture surgery during the training period, whereas 21 (14%) answered that they had conducted fracture surgery over 20 times. Experience in performing the surgical procedure was the most valuable in fracture training.ConclusionTo optimize fracture education among orthopaedic residents, the professors at teaching hospitals should understand the realities of fracture education, dedicate sufficient time for internal and external fracture teachings, and allow residents to perform fracture surgeries hands-on under their supervision, and also attempt to foster a social atmosphere that encourages all three factors.     

纳米炭在甲状腺手术中使用方法的全国百名专家10年经验问卷调查报告

背景与目的 纳米炭混悬注射液（以下简称纳米炭）作为一种淋巴结示踪剂，已广泛应用于甲状腺手术中快速识别甲状旁腺，避免手术误伤。然而，目前甲状腺乳头状癌（PTC）手术中的纳米炭具体使用方法、标准技术流程尚未统一。因此，本研究通过问卷调查的方式了解国内外科医师在PTC手术中使用纳米炭的技巧、体会和经验，以期为临床规范化使用纳米炭提供依据。方法 在文献调研的基础上，设计“纳米炭在甲状腺乳头状癌中的使用方法”专家调查问卷表，分发给从事甲状腺外科的高年资、高手术量的外科医师填写，回收问卷后进行统计分析。结果 本次调研共发放问卷107份，返回的有效问卷共计105份，来自26省78家三级甲等医院。91位（86.7%）专家每年使用纳米炭数量在100~1 000支。调查的专家意见协调程度较高，53位（50.5%）专家认为注射纳米炭后甲状腺腺叶呈现地图样斑驳均匀染色为最佳，在甲状腺腺叶切除和全部切除术中，超过90%的专家认为术中注射纳米炭为最佳时机，超过50%的专家认为纳米炭每点注射最佳剂量为0.05~0.1 mL，注射后需等待1~5 min；腺叶切除只需注射1个位点，全切只需要注射2个位点；注射后1~5 min甲状旁腺负显影和中央区淋巴结染色。超过70%的专家推荐在颈侧方淋巴结清扫、腔镜和机器人甲状腺手术中采用术中直视下纳米炭注射。总结避免术中纳米炭渗漏的应用技巧包括：适当稀释、细针刺入、包膜完整、少量注射、把控深度、负压拔针、常规压迫、凝闭针孔、术野清洁。结论 本研究首次通过问卷调查的方式初步了解外科医师使用纳米炭的情况，为纳米炭使用的技术方法做出了经验性的总结与归纳，调查结果具有较好的代表性，为以后纳米炭合理、正确地使用与临床应用研究提供了指导基础。