Anterior Ankle Incision Wound Complications Between Total Ankle Replacement and Ankle Arthrodesis: A Matched Cohort Study

The anterior incision is commonly used for total ankle replacement (TAR) and ankle arthrodesis. Historically, the anterior incision has demonstrated a high incidence of complications. The purpose of this study was to evaluate anterior incisional healing and soft tissue complications between TAR and ankle arthrodesis with anterior plate fixation.This was an IRB-approved retrospective review of wound healing and other complications among 304 patients who underwent primary TAR (191 patients) or ankle arthrodesis (113 patients) via the anterior approach over a 4-year period. The operative approach, intraoperative soft tissue handling, and postoperative protocol for the first 30 days were the same between groups. The mean follow-up was 11.8 months. To diminish the effect of selection bias, a subgroup analysis was performed comparing 91 TAR patients matched to an equal number of demographically similar ankle arthrodesis patients. Overall, 19.7% of patients experienced delayed wound healing greater than 30 days. Although the TAR and arthrodesis subgroups had dissimilar demographics, there was no difference in outcomes. Between matched pairs, no statistically significant differences were observed; however, trends were identified with matched cohort groups when compared to the overall patient series. These trends toward statistically significant differences in delayed wound healing and incidence of wound care in the matched cohort groups warrants further investigation in larger series or multicenter study. Further work is needed to identify the modifiable risk factors associated with the anterior ankle incision.     

Tourniquet Use During Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Ankle Fractures – A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

The intra-operative use of tourniquet in open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of ankle fractures remains a topic of debate. The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials (RCTs) comparing clinical outcomes of patients undergoing ankle ORIF with tourniquet use versus a control group where no tourniquet was used. A systematic review was performed with reference to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines of the Pubmed, Scopus, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases. Studies were included if they were an RCT comparing tourniquet and no-tourniquet in ankle ORIF. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan, and p-value <.05 was considered to be statistically significant. On completion of the literature search, a total of 4 RCTs including 350 ankles (52.6% males), with a mean age of 47.1 ± 5.7 years were included. There were 173 patients in the tourniquet group (T), versus 177 patients in the no tourniquet control group (NT), with nonsignificant differences between the groups for age, gender and body mass index demographics (all p > .05). There were significantly shorter duration of surgery, with significantly higher patient-reported rates of pain levels at day 2 postoperatively (both p < .001) in the T group. Additionally, there were significantly greater ranges of ankle motion at 6 weeks postoperatively (p = .03), with nonsignificant differences reported incidence of wound infections and deep vein thrombosis (p = .056 and p = .130 respectively) between the groups. In conclusion, current evidence suggests that although intraoperative tourniquet usage in cases of ankle ORIF results in significant reductions in duration of surgery, this may be at the expense of higher patient-reported pain scores and reduced range of motion postoperatively.     

Effectiveness of Arthroscopically Assisted Surgery for Ankle Arthrodesis

Regarding the treatment of ankle arthritis, the choice of arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis (AAA) or open ankle arthrodesis (OAA) remains controversial. To guide clinical decision-making, we conducted a meta-analysis on the optimal treatment of ankle arthrodesis. We identified eligible studies published from June 1, 1969 to June 1, 2020 using the Cochrane Library, PubMed, OVID, Embase, and Medline searched the references of relevant studies. Randomized and non-randomized studies that compared outcomes of AAA and OAA were included. After the methodologic assessment, available data were extracted and statistically reviewed. The primary outcomes were overall complications rate, tourniquet time, length of the hospital stay, non-union rate, and rate to fusion. The secondary outcomes were delayed union and postoperative infection rate. We included 9 studies comparing arthroscopic and open in patients with ankle arthrodesis, comprising 467 participants. AAA had the advantage of demonstrating a lower overall complication rate (odds ratio [OR], 0.44 [95% confidence interval [CI], 0.26-0.73]; p = .002), shorter intraoperative tourniquet time (mean difference [MD], -16.49 [95% CI, -23.51 to -9.46]; p < .001), shorter length of the hospital stay (MD -1.75, 95% CI -1.94 to -1.2, p < .001),lower non-union rate (OR, -0.07 [95% CI, -0.13 to -0.02]; p <.01) and higher rate to fusion (OR, 4.2 [95% CI, 1.96-8.99]; p < .001) in comparison with OAA. Yet, no significant differences were found in delayed union (OR, 0.46 [95% CI, 0.10-2.04]; p = .30) and postoperative infection rate (OR, 0.45 [95% CI, 0.17-1.15]; p = .09) between the groups. Our results suggest that arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis is superior to open ankle arthrodesis alone in the treatment of ankle arthritis based on the overall complication rate, intraoperative tourniquet time, length of the hospital stay, non-union rate and rate to fusion. However, further high-quality randomized controlled trials with appropriate blinding methods are needed to confirm the findings.     

Effect on Hospital Length of Stay of Tourniquet Use During Internal Fixation of Ankle Fractures: Randomized Controlled Trial

Approximately 50% of ankle fractures require internal fixation. A tourniquet is often used to create a bloodless operative field, but its effect on hospital length of stay (LOS) is unclear. This article reports a parallel-group observer-blinded randomized trial of the effect of tourniquet use on LOS. One hundred eighty-eight adult patients requiring internal fixation of ankle fracture were randomized to surgery with or without a tourniquet. LOS was analyzed on intention-to-treat principles using Poisson regression. As a secondary outcome, duration of operation was analyzed by analysis of covariance. Mean LOS was 1.79 ± 1.50 days in the tourniquet group and 1.65 ± 1.11 days in the no-tourniquet group. The covariate-adjusted rate ratio for LOS (reference group: no tourniquet) was 1.084 (95% confidence interval 0.871, 1.348; p?=?.470). Sensitivity analyses (unadjusted intention-to-treat analysis and as-treated analysis) gave similar nonsignificant results. The covariate-adjusted mean difference in duration of operation was 3.03 minutes (95% confidence interval –4.96, 11.02; p?=?.455), favoring the tourniquet group; sensitivity analyses again gave similar results. Adverse events did not differ significantly between groups. In conclusion, the use of a tourniquet during internal fixation does not significantly influence hospital LOS, of which preinjury medical condition of the patient appears to be the most important determinant.     

Retrospective review of complications following long tourniquet time in foot and ankle surgery

BackgroundTourniquet use is ubiquitous in orthopaedic surgery to create a bloodless field and to facilitate safe surgery, however, we know of the potential complications that can occur as a result of prolonged tourniquet time. Experimental and clinical research has helped define the safe time limits but there is not much literature specific to foot and ankle surgery.MethodsA retrospective review of the postoperative course of patients with prolonged tourniquet time (longer than 180 min) for foot and ankle procedures was done. Data related to the patient factors and the surgical procedure was collected. The length of stay, re-admissions and complications were the important indicators of the individual patient’s recovery.ResultsTwenty patients were identified with longer than 180-min tourniquet times for complex foot and ankle procedures. The average uninterrupted tourniquet time was 191 min. Eight of the twenty procedures were revision surgeries. The average length of stay was 3 days and there were no re-admissions within 30 days. Eight patients (40%) had at least one recorded complication. The complications seen in this group were transient sensory loss, wound issues, superficial infection, ongoing pain and non-union.ConclusionsThis case series has not revealed any major systemic complications resulting from the prolonged tourniquet such as pulmonary embolism or renal dysfunction. Unlike past literature on knee procedures with extended tourniquet times, no major nerve palsies were seen in our patient group. Our understanding of the local and systemic effects of tourniquet is not complete and this study demonstrates that the complications do not necessarily increase in a linear fashion in relation to the tourniquet time.     

The Effects of Tibialis Anterior Tenotomy on Wound Complications and Functional Outcomes After Anterior Fusion Plating for Severe Ankle Arthritis

Nonunion is known to be a relatively common complication following ankle arthrodesis. Various fixation techniques have been introduced to enhance the stability and to improve fusion rate. With the use of anterior plate supplementation, postoperative wound problems have been frequently reported despite better fusion rate. This study was performed to determine the effects of tibialis anterior (TA) tenotomy on wound complications and functional outcomes after anterior fusion plating for severe ankle arthritis. Forty-six patients who underwent ankle arthrodesis using anterior fusion plate were followed for more than 2 years. TA tenotomy was performed prior to wound closure in all patients. As a control group, 38 patients who underwent arthrodesis without TA tenotomy were analyzed. Functional outcomes were evaluated with Ankle Osteoarthritis Scale and Foot and Ankle Ability Measure. Wound complication rate, time to fusion, fusion rate, time to pain relief were evaluated. Mean Ankle Osteoarthritis Scale and Foot and Ankle Ability Measure scores significantly improved to 32.6 and 69.4 points at final follow-up, respectively. As compared to control group (33.8 and 67.7 points), there were no significant differences in functional outcomes. As postoperative wound complications, there were 1 case of wound dehiscence and 1 case of superficial wound infection. TA tenotomy group showed a significantly lower wound complication rate (4.3%) than control group (23.7%) (p < .001). While there were no significant differences in fusion rate, time to fusion, and time to pain relief between both groups, control group needed higher rate of implant removal. Ankle arthrodesis using anterior fusion plate in conjunction with TA tenotomy appears to be an effective surgical option for end-stage ankle arthritis, with excellent fusion rate and less wound complication rate. Although there were no specific functional deficits related to absence of TA tendon, further studies are needed to determine long-term effects of TA tenotomy in patients with a fused ankle.     

Open Ankle Arthrodesis: A Retrospective Analysis Comparing Different Fixation Methods

A wide variation of surgical options, complications, and union rates are reported in the treatment of end-stage ankle arthritis. However, open ankle arthrodesis remains the golden standard for ankle arthritis. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the union rate and complication rate as well as identify potential risk factors for different methods of fixation in patients with end-stage ankle arthritis of different etiology. In total, 42 ankles of 41 patients with ankle osteoarthritis were included for this single-center retrospective study. The mean age was 50 years (range 22-75 years). Twenty patients were treated with screw-fixation, 14 with plate(s) and 8 with intramedullary nail. The results of this study showed an overall union rate of 97.6% (41 of the 42 operated ankles) and an overall complication rate of 21.4% (9 events). The mean follow-up time was 16 months (range 2.5-83.0 months). Complications consisted of 1 nonunion, 4 deep infections, 2 cases of wound dehiscence, 1 delayed union and 1 malalignment of the ankle joint. The plate-fixation group demonstrated significantly higher infections when compared with screw and intramedullary nail fixation (p = .017). There were no other significant variables for incidence of complications between patients in the uncomplicated and complicated group. This study achieved good clinical results for different methods of fixation in open ankle arthrodesis. In specific, the use of intramedullary nail provides excellent results for end-stage ankle arthritis with high union rate and a low complication rate.     

Arthroscopic versus Open Ankle Arthrodesis: A Retrospective Cost Analysis

Compared with traditional open arthrodesis, arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis has been associated with similar rates of fusion, decreased time to union, decreased pain, shorter hospital stay, earlier mobilization, reliable clinical results, and fewer complications. The aim of this case-control study was to analyze cost differences between outpatient arthroscopic and inpatient open ankle arthrodesis. To this end, the authors analyzed 20 ankle arthrodesis procedures: 10 performed by one surgeon on an inpatient basis using an open approach, and 10 performed by another surgeon on an outpatient basis arthroscopically. Patient age, body mass index, tourniquet time, length of stay, complications, days to clinical union, and insurance type, as well as charges and reimbursements for the surgeons and the hospital or surgery center were abstracted from the records. Statistically significant differences were observed between the outpatient arthroscopic and inpatient open arthrodesis groups for total site charges ($3898 ± 0.00 versus $32,683 ± $12,762, respectively, P < .0001), reimbursement to the surgeon ($1567 ± $320 versus $1107 ± $278, respectively, P = .003), and reimbursement to the hospital or ambulatory surgery center ($1110 ± $287 versus $8432 ± $2626, respectively); the ratio of hospital/surgery center charges to hospital/surgery center reimbursements was 28.48% for the inpatient arthroscopic group and 25.80% for the inpatient open arthrodesis group. Outpatient arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis, compared with inpatient open ankle arthrodesis, appears to be less expensive for third party payers, and surgeons are paid more, whereas hospitals and ambulatory surgical centers get paid a greater proportion of the charges that they bill.     

Anterior ankle arthrodesis

Ankle arthrodesis is a common procedure that resolves many conditions of the foot and ankle; however, complications following this procedure are often reported and vary depending on the fixation technique. Various techniques have been described in the attempt to achieve ankle arthrodesis and there is much debate as to the efficiency of each one. This study aims to evaluate the efficiency of anterior plating in ankle arthrodesis using customised and Synthes TomoFix plates. We present the outcomes of 28 ankle arthrodeses between 2005 and 2012, specifically examining rate of union, patient-reported outcomes scores, and complications. All 28 patients achieved radiographic union at an average of 36 wk; the majority of patients (92.86%) at or before 16 wk, the exceptions being two patients with Charcot joints who were noted to have bony union at a three year review. Patient-reported outcomes scores significantly increased (P < 0.05). Complications included two delayed unions as previously mentioned, infection, and extended postoperative pain. With multiple points for fixation and coaxial screw entry points, the contoured customised plate offers added compression and provides a rigid fixation for arthrodesis stabilization.     

Total Ankle Arthroplasty Survivorship: A Meta-analysis

The gold standard for management of end-stage ankle arthritis was previously ankle arthrodesis; however, improvements in total ankle replacements are making this a more viable treatment option. The primary aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the survivorship of total ankle replacement implants currently in use. An extensive search strategy initially captured 20,842 citations that were evaluated for relevance. Abstract screening produced 97 articles to be read in entirety, of which 10 articles studying 1963 implants met all prospective inclusion criteria for analysis. Overall survivorship of all implants was 93.0% (95% confidence interval, 85.2-96.9) using a random effect model. There was significant heterogeneity between the studies (Q = 131.504). Meta-regression identified an inverse relationship between survivorship and study follow-up duration (p < .0001). Furthermore, age (p = .36) and implant type (fixed-bearing [95.6%, 95% confidence interval, 85.9-98.7] versus mobile-bearing ]89.4%, 95% confidence interval, 79.6%-94.8%]) did not have a statistically significant impact on survivorship, p = .213. However, patients with higher preoperative functional scores had improved survivorship (p = .001). Complications were inconsistently reported with varied definitions. In order of reported frequency, complications were classified into technical error (28.15%), subsidence (16.89%), implant failure (13.28%), aseptic loosening (6.3%), intraoperative fracture (5.67%), wound problems (4.3%), deep infection (1%), and postoperative fracture (0.0001%). Overall study quality was low, with only 10% being prospective and 90% from nonregistry data. The results from this meta-analysis revealed a promising overall survivorship of current implants in use for total ankle replacement; however higher quality studies with standardized outcomes measures are needed.     

Is It Worth Discriminating Against Patients Who Smoke? A Systematic Literature Review on the Effects of Tobacco Use in Foot and Ankle Surgery

Although numerous studies have linked smoking with lower extremity wound and bone healing complications, a comprehensive study on the effects of smoking in foot and ankle surgery has not yet been reported. The purpose of the present study was to report the results of our systemic literature review, identifying the effects of tobacco use on common foot and ankle procedures. The systematic literature review was performed according to guidelines set by the PRIMSA statement (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses). Smoking, as a single risk factor, was analyzed and used to compare adverse outcomes in the postoperative setting of foot and ankle surgery. We reviewed 528 abstracts that met our initial identification criteria. After an extensive review process, 46 of the articles (8.71%) met the eligibility requirements to be included in the present study. Distal bunionectomy with osteotomy, first metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis, Lapidus bunionectomy, toe amputation, transmetatarsal amputation, Syme's amputation, open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) of calcaneal fractures, ankle fracture ORIF, pilon fracture ORIF, subtalar arthrodesis, rearfoot arthrodesis, tibiocalcaneal arthrodesis, ankle arthrodesis, total ankle arthroplasty, and plastic surgery procedures and their respective negative association with smoking was identified and described in our review. Our systematic literature review revealed that procedures involving arthrodesis, fracture ORIF, and plastic surgery were associated with negative outcomes in smokers. Procedures that did not involve osseous unions such as total ankle arthroplasty and amputations did not appear to have negative outcomes associated with smoking.     

Tibiotalocalcaneal Arthrodesis with Structural Allograft for Management of Large Osseous Defects of the Hindfoot and Ankle: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Large osseous defects of the hindfoot and ankle pose a surgical challenge. Tibiotalocalcaneal (TTC) arthrodesis utilizing a structural allograft may be required to fill the osseous void, preserve limb length and achieve fusion. Several authors have reported small case series on this topic, however outcomes have varied and no systematic review of this data has been published to date. The primary aim of this study is to report rates of osseous union, limb salvage and complications in patients undergoing TTC arthrodesis with a structural allograft. A total of 11 publications were identified that met the inclusion criteria. One hundred seventy-five patients were included with a weighted mean age of 60.5 (range 50-72) years and follow-up period of 29.7 (range 3-62) months. Femoral head allograft was the most commonly utilized structural graft and a retrograde intramedullary nail was the most common fixation construct. Results demonstrated an overall union rate of 67.4%, limb salvage rate of 92.5% and complication rate of 26.6%. Allograft-related complications were rare with an allograft fracture rate of 0.1% and allograft collapse rate of 1.2%. There was no significant difference in union rate when using a retrograde intramedullary nail versus a plate construct (p = .9148). TTC arthrodesis with use of a structural allograft is a viable treatment option for limb salvage when faced with complex hindfoot and ankle pathology involving large osseous defects. Despite high rates of radiographic nonunion, this approach can provide patients with a stable and functional limb while avoiding amputation.     

Union Rates With the Use of Structural Allograft in Lapidus Arthrodesis: A Comparison Between Two Fixation Constructs

Although structural allograft has been previously described as acceptable practice for reconstructive foot and ankle surgery, results for an allograft bone wedge in Lapidus arthrodesis are unknown. Additionally, there is no consensus on the superiority of a single fixation construct in Lapidus cases. Our objective was (1) to report union rates for Lapidus arthrodesis with and without the use of an allograft bone wedge and (2) to determine if fixation construct impacts rates of union when using structural allograft. A review was performed for Lapidus cases with fixation constructs of 2 crossed compression screws (CS) and a medial locking plate with single transarticular screw (MPS), both with and without use of an allograft bone wedge. Inclusion required a CT scan to evaluate bony union. There was no significant difference in union rates (p = .41) between the use (90%) and the nonuse (97%) of an allograft bone wedge. Union rates were significantly different (p = .04) when comparing CS fixation (85%) and MPS fixation (98%). The comparative results between the fixation constructs highlight the importance of compression across the arthrodesis site as part of a robust fixation construct. Our findings demonstrate that the use of an allograft bone wedge in Lapidus arthrodesis may mitigate complications due to metatarsal shortening while providing satisfactory rates of union.     

PEMF as treatment for delayed healing of foot and ankle arthrodesis

BACKGROUND: Arthrodesis is the most common surgical treatment for foot and ankle arthritis. In adults, these procedures are associated with a 5% to 10% rate of nonunion. Pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) stimulation was approved by the Federal Drug Administration (FDA) for treatment of delayed unions after long-bone fractures and joint arthrodesis. The purpose of this study was to examine the results of PEMF treatment for delayed healing after foot and ankle arthrodesis. METHODS: Three hundred and thirty-four foot and ankle arthrodeses were done. Nineteen resulted in delayed unions that were treated with a protocol of immobilization, limited weightbearing, and PEMF stimulation for a median of 7 (range 5 to 27) months. All patients were followed clinically and radiographically. RESULTS: The use of PEMF, immobilization, and limited weightbearing to treat delayed union after foot and ankle arthrodesis was successful in 5 of 19 (26%) patients. Of the other 14 patients with nonunions, nine had revision surgery with autogenous grafting, continued immobilization, and PEMF stimulation. Seven of these eventually healed at a median of 5.5 (range 2 to 26) months and two did not heal. One patient had a below-knee amputation, and four refused further treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The protocol of PEMF, immobilization, and limited weightbearing had a relatively low success rate in this group of patients. We no longer use this protocol alone to treat delayed union after foot and ankle arthrodesis.     

Ankle Arthrodesis: A Retrospective Analysis Comparing Single Column,Locked Anterior Plating to Crossed Lag Screw Technique

Ankle arthrodesis is performed to eliminate pain due to end-stage osteoarthritis, regardless of etiology. This procedure remains the reference standard treatment for end-stage ankle arthritis, despite recent advancements in total ankle replacement. The objective of the present study was to retrospectively evaluate the radiographic and clinical fusion rates and time to bony fusion for patients who underwent ankle arthrodesis using an anterior approach with a single column locked plate construct versus crossed lag screws. We identified 358 patients who had undergone ankle arthrodesis from January 2003 to June 2013. Of the 358 patients, 83 (23.2%) met the inclusion criteria for the present study. Of the 83 included patients, 47 received locked anterior (or anterolateral) plate fixation, and 36 received crossed lag screw constructs. The overall nonunion rate was 6.0% (n = 5), with 1 nonunion in the anterior plate group (2.1%) and 4 nonunions in the crossed lag screw group (11.1%; p = .217). No differences were identified between the 2 groups for normal talocrural angle [χ² (1) = 0.527; p = .468], normal tibial axis/talar ratio [χ² (1) = 0.004; p = .952], and lateral dorsiflexion angle (p = .565). Based on our findings in similar demographic groups, ankle arthrodesis using locked anterior plate fixation is a safe technique with similar complication rates and radiographic outcomes to those of crossed lag screws.     

Is intraoperative pedography helpful in clinical use—Preliminary results of 100 cases from a consecutive,prospective, randomized,controlled clinical study

BackgroundThe purpose of this study was to assess the clinical use, and to analyze the potential clinical benefit of intraoperative pedography (IP) in a sufficient number of cases in comparison with cases treated without IP.MethodsPatients (age 18 years and older) which sustained an arthrodesis and/or correction of the foot and ankle were included.ResultsOne hundred cases were included (ankle correction arthrodesis, n = 12; subtalar joint correction arthrodesis, n = 14; arthrodesis without correction midfoot, n = 15; correction arthrodesis midfoot, n = 26; correction forefoot, n = 33). Fifty-two patients were randomized for the use of IP. In 24 of the 52 patients (46%), the correction was modified after IP during the same operation.ConclusionsIn 46% of the cases a modification of the surgical correction was made after IP in the same surgical procedure. Whether IP improve the plantar force distribution of the foot and the mid- or long-term clinical outcome has to be critically analyzed when longer follow-up is completed.     

An Umbrella Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Systematic Reviews on the Topic of Foot and Ankle Arthrodesis Nonunion Rates

The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to appraise and combine the available systematic reviews reporting nonunion incidence and prevalence in foot and ankle arthrodesis procedures. The Cochrane Library and MEDLINE were searched for relevant systematic reviews from inception to January 2022. Two independent reviewers selected and reviewed eligible studies. Studies were included if they were systematic reviews or meta-analyses reporting nonunion incidence and prevalence in foot or ankle arthrodesis procedures. Fourteen systematic reviews of 8 types of joint arthrodesis procedures were included for meta-analysis. These reviews comprised 138 studies with 5793 joint arthrodesis procedures. Quality of the included reviews were assessed using the AMSTAR2 checklist. Overall and subgroup meta-analysis of prevalence were performed using random effects model. Publication bias was determined by evaluation of a DOI plot with the Luis Furuya-Kanamori index of asymmetry. The pooled prevalence for foot and ankle nonunion rate was 8.1% (95% confidence interval [CI] 6.5%-9.9%). Overall prevalence of nonunion for single joint foot and ankle joint arthrodesis was 6.1% (95% CI 4.8%-7.6%). Subgroup analysis found that the highest rate of nonunion occurred during tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis with 27.1% (95% CI 19.4%-35.2%). We have reported the first meta-analysis of systematic reviews on nonunion rates in foot and ankle arthrodesis procedures. The overall nonunion rate for foot and ankle arthrodesis procedures was 8.1%. For single joint fusion procedures, the nonunion prevalence was 6.1%. Our reported nonunion rates are lower than previously published numbers.     

Autologous bone from hip or knee replacement in simultaneous foot or ankle arthrodeses

Simultaneous operations on the lower extremities may potentially benefit some patients. However, the only literature discussing simultaneous operations has been limited to bilateral simultaneous total hip or knee replacements. The cases of 10 patients who had combined joint arthroplasty (8 knee, 2 hip) and foot and ankle arthrodesis (6 subtalar, 4 ankle) were reviewed retrospectively. Combining the procedures allowed the patient to have autologous bone brought from the joint replacement site to the foot or ankle to assist in filling defects in the arthrodesis. The fusion rate of 100% and the good results of hip or knee replacement demonstrate that successful treatment is possible when both conditions are treated simultaneously.     

Survey of tourniquet use in podiatric surgery

Tourniquet use in foot and ankle surgery is common practice; however, the technique varies among foot and ankle surgeons and there are no standard guidelines. To analyze trends in foot and ankle tourniquet use, the authors conducted an e-mail survey. One thousand six hundred sixty-five foot and ankle surgeons were sent a tourniquet-use survey via e-mail, across Canada and the United States. Nineteen percent of the recipients completed and returned the surveys. Eleven (3.4%) rarely or never use a tourniquet and 8 (2.5%) use an Esmarch bandage tourniquet at the ankle. Most use pneumatic ankle cuffs (92% use, 27% use exclusively); many also use thigh cuffs (69%) and some also use calf cuffs (15%). Most thigh-cuff users (62%) experience problems with cuff fit sometimes or often. All but 3 respondents exsanguinate the limb before tourniquet inflation. Specific devices used for exsanguination varied among surgeons. Most commonly used tourniquet pressures range from /=351 mm Hg for the thigh (64% use pressures between 301 and 350 mm Hg). Only 7% of respondents consider limb occlusion pressure when selecting tourniquet cuff pressure. Based on published studies of limb occlusion pressures, these ranges suggest that some of the more common pressure settings may be higher than necessary for many patients. Vascular disease or previous bypass (91%) and deep vein thrombosis (83%) were the most commonly listed contraindications to tourniquet use. Approximately 10% of respondents have either experienced or learned of skin and nerve injuries secondary to lower extremity tourniquet use at any level. The varied responses show a lack of overall consensus on tourniquet pressure settings. Guidelines for optimizing cuff pressure and technique should be established to minimize the risk of complications.