Mortality following combined burn and traumatic brain injuries: An analysis of the national trauma data bank of the American College of Surgeons

BackgroundSevere burn and traumatic brain injuries (TBI) lead to significant mortality, and combined burn-TBI injuries may predispose towards even worse outcomes. The purpose of this study was to investigate the mortality of patients with burn, burn with non-TBI trauma, and combined burn/TBI to determine if combined injury portends a worse outcome.MethodsWe obtained the National Trauma Data Bank from 2007 to 2012, identifying 32,334 patients with burn related injuries, dividing this cohort into three injury types: BURN ONLY, BURN with TRAUMA/NO TBI, and BURN with TBI. For each patient, demographic data was obtained, including age, gender, presence of trauma, TBI, or inhalation injury, burn total body surface area (TBSA), Glasgow Coma Scale, Injury Severity Score, and mortality. Multivariable logistic regression was performed.ResultsAge, gender, and TBSA were similar across the three injury groups, but the incidence of inhalation injury was doubled in the BURN with TRAUMA/NO TBI (15.4 %) and BURN with TBI (15.3 %) groups when compared to the BURN ONLY (7.2 %) group. Mortality differed across injury categories after adjusting for age, TBSA, and inhalation injury. Increased mortality was seen in BURN with TRAUMA/NO TBI versus BURN ONLY (OR = 1.27 [1.06, 1.53]) and was higher when comparing BURN with TBI versus BURN ONLY (OR = 4.22 [2.85, 6.18]). BURN with TBI also had higher mortality when compared to BURN with TRAUMA/NO TBI (OR = 3.33 [2.30, 4.82]). The logs odds of mortality also increased with increasing age, TBSA and presence of inhalation injury.DiscussionThis analysis of the NTDB suggests that mortality following burn-related injuries may be higher when burn injury is combined with TBI when compared to burns with other trauma, even after correcting for age, TBSA, and inhalation injury. Further clinical and laboratory research is needed to validate these findings and better understand how to optimize combined TBI and burn injury treatment.     

No influence of burn size on ventilator-associated pneumonia in burn patients with inhalation injury

Objective

Burn size and inhalation injury are important predictors of mortality following burn. The important factors for predicting ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) following burn remain unclear. The aim of our study was to investigate the effect of burn size on VAP in burn patients with inhalation injury.

Methods

We retrospectively studied 52 burn patients with inhalation injury requiring mechanical ventilation admitted to the Department of Acute Medicine, Kawasaki Medical School Hospital, Okayama, Japan, between June 2007 and October 2010.

Results

The overall mortality for all patients was 15%. Twenty-six patients (50%) developed VAP. Patients with VAP required longer ICU stay and mechanical ventilation than those without VAP. There was no difference in age, gender, mortality, and TBSA between burn patients with inhalation injury with and Without VAP. VAP rate had no difference with increasing TBSA in burn patients with inhalation injury.

Conclusions

Our data indicated that burn size had no relationship with the development of VAP in burn patients with inhalation injury.     

Improved outcomes of renal injury following burn trauma

BackgroundAcute kidney injury (AKI) is common in major burn injuries and associated with increased mortality. With advances in surgical and critical care it is unclear if mortality in this population remains this high. This study aims to describe incidence and outcomes of patients admitted to intensive care (ICU) with a burn injury who develop AKI. We additionally sought to determine risk factors for developing AKI.MethodsA historical cohort study of patients admitted to ICU from 2010 to 2016 with major burn injury was conducted. Demographic, laboratory, and clinical information was collected. AKI was defined by Acute Kidney Injury Network (AKIN) classification. Multivariable logistic regression was used to model association between baseline risk factors and risk of AKI.ResultsOf the 151 patients included, 64 people developed AKI (42%) defined by stages 1–3 of AKIN criteria. The median TBSA was 20% (IQR 9–41). Renal replacement therapy was required in 18/64 (28%) who developed AKI. Multivariable logistic regression demonstrated association between AKI and the following variables: APACHE II score (OR 1.2, 95%CI 1.1–1.3, P = 0.001), age (OR 1.8 per 10-year increase, 95%CI: 1.2–2.5, P = 0.002) and log(TBSA). Fractional polynomial regression analysis demonstrates that the best functional form of TBSA was in the natural logarithm (OR 2.7, 95%CI: 1.5–4.7, p = 0.001). Compared to those without AKI, patients with AKI had longer duration of mechanical ventilation, (median 11 [IQR 6–19] vs. 4 [IQR 2–9] days), ICU stay (15 [IQR 9–22] vs. 6 [IQR 3–10] days), and increased mortality (14 of 64(22%) vs. 4 of 87(5%).ConclusionsAKI is common in patients with a major burn injury. However, mortality is lower than described in the literature, particularly for those who required renal replacement therapy.     

Outcomes following burn injury in intensive care patients with major psychiatric disorders

AimsPatients with psychiatric comorbidity have been shown to experience high rates of burn injury. Burn epidemiology, etiology, and outcomes have been sparsely documented for patients with major psychiatric disorders. The aim of this study was to analyze the epidemiologic characteristics and outcomes in intensive care burn patients with pre-existing and acute major psychiatric disorders .MethodsA retrospective study was performed including intensive care burn patients admitted between March 2007 and December 2020. Demographic, clinical and epidemiological data were collected and analyzed. Major psychiatric co-morbidities were collected according to ICD-9 and ICD-10 classifications. Patients were stratified according to F-diagnoses.ResultsA total of 1325 patients were included. 16.6 % of all patients had one or more major psychiatric disorders- 9.3 % with anxiety, dissociative, stress-related, somatoform and other nonpsychotic mental disorders, 9.2 % with mood (affective) disorders, 3.5 % with schizophrenia and other non-mood psychotic disorders, and 1.8 % with disorders of adult personality and behavior. Patients with major psychiatric disorders presented with significantly higher burn severity, reflected by higher abbreviated burn severity index (ABSI) scores (5.9 vs. 5.3, p < 0.001) and larger total body surface area (TBSA) affected (15.9 vs. 12.5 %, p = 0.002). Burned TBSA ≥ 30 and inhalation injuries were observed more frequently in patients with MDP, however without statistical significance. They also experienced prolonged hospital length-of-stay (LOS) (25.5 vs. 16.3 days, p < 0.001), prolonged intensive care unit LOS (14.8 vs. 7.7 days, p < 0.001), underwent surgical interventions (3.5 vs. 2.3, p < 0.001) and mechanical ventilation more frequently (34.1 % vs. 16.5 %, p = 0.43) and had significantly longer ventilation durations (73.5 vs. 31.2 h, p = 0.002). Mortality rates were lower compared to patients without major psychiatric disorders (5.9 vs. 8.1, p < 0.001).ConclusionsThe prevalence of major psychiatric disorders in burn patients is considerably high. Patients with psychiatric comorbidities were found to have greater burn severity, prolonged total hospital and ICU LOS, underwent surgical interventions and mechanical ventilation more frequently and had prolonged ventilation duration. Our results highlight the importance of identifying burn patients with major psychiatric disorders who may necessitate additional resources and require extensive inpatient psychiatric care and counseling.     

Seasonal impact in burn profiles in a dedicated burn unit

IntroductionThe number of burns in Portugal remains considerably large and therefore constitutes a major public health problem. There is a shortage of studies describing the epidemiological and clinical impact of seasonality on burn centre admissions, particularly in high income countries.MethodsThis retrospective analysis included all patients (>18 years old) with acute burns admitted to a specialized Burn Center in Lisbon (Hospital São José) between 20 of September 2010 and 19 of September 2017 (7 years). Clinical data was obtained from electronic medical records. The patients were categorized into four groups, according to each season.ResultsSix hundred and sixteen (616) patients were included in this analysis, the majority being male (55.2%). There were no significant differences between the number of patients admitted in each season nor in gender distribution. Older patients were admitted during winter. Hospitalisation time was higher for patients admitted in the winter and surface area injured was higher for those admitted during summer. Fire burns were the most common aetiology in all seasons. Work related burns and suicide attempts were more frequent in the summer. Most patients had more than one anatomical area affected (73.9%) and winter was specifically associated with more frequent isolated lower limb burns. Winter and fire burns were associated with deeper injuries. More patients underwent surgery during winter (80.7%) than in the remaining seasons (average 65%) but the average number of surgeries per season did not change significantly. The overall mortality rate was 6.8% and the need for mechanical ventilation was 28.9%. Concerning both variables we did not find major differences across seasons. Mortality was associated with older patients, deeper and more extensive burns and need for mechanical ventilation.ConclusionWinter seems to be associated with older patients and with the most severe burns (deeper and more often needing surgery). This study was designed to fill the gap in seasonal burn profile in Portugal and it helps in establishing preventive strategies and better resource allocation.     

Epidemiology and outcome analysis of 1359 intensive care burn patients: A 14-year retrospective study in a major burn center

AimsGlobally, burn-related morbidity and mortality still remain high. In order to identify regional high-risk populations and to suggest appropriate prevention measure allocation, we aimed at analyzing epidemiological characteristics, etiology and outcomes of our 14-year experience with an intensive care unit (ICU) burn patient population.MethodsA retrospective observational study was conducted including patients treated between March 2007 and December 2020 in our intensive care burn unit. Demographic, clinical and epidemiological data were collected and analyzed.ResultsA total of 1359 patients were included. 68% of the subjects were males and the largest age group affected entailed 45–64-year-old adults (34%). Regarding etiology, flame and contact burns were the most common in all age groups. Mean affected total body surface area (TBSA) was 13 ± 14.5% in all subjects. Most of the burns occurred domestically or during recreational activities. Mean hospital stay was 17.77 ± 19.7 days. The average mortality was 7.7%. The mortality rate showed an overall decreasing trend whilst burn severity remained consistent from 2007 to 2020.ConclusionsDespite consistent burn severity presentations of annual ICU admissions, burn injury mortality showed a decreasing trend, which was in part attributed to substantial progress in burn care and treatment and improved burn prevention awareness. Statistically significant age and gender differences could be detected with regard to burn etiology and seasonality, as well as outcomes, which highlight the importance of individualized primary prevention programs.     

Enzymatic debridement in critically injured burn patients — Our experience in the intensive care setting and during burn resuscitation

BackgroundMuch of the recent literature on bromelain based enzymatic debridement of burn injury has focused on its use in smaller burn injury and specialist areas such as the hands or genitals (Krieger et al., 2012; Schulz et al., 2017a,b,c,d). This is despite the original papers describing its use in larger burn injury (Rosenberg et al., 2004, 2014).The current EMA license for Nexobrid? advises that it should not be used for burn injuries of more than 15% TBSA and should be used with caution in patients with pulmonary burn trauma and suspected pulmonary burn trauma. The original safety and efficacy trial of NexoBrid? limited its use to 15% TBSA aliquots with concern regarding the effect of bromelain on coagulation. In a European consensus paper of experienced burns clinicians, now on its second iteration, 100% of respondents agreed that “up to 30% BSA can be treated by enzymatic debridement based on individual decision” (Hirche et al., 2017). Hofmaenner et al.’s recent study on the safety of enzymatic debridement in extensive burns larger than 15% provides some further evidence that “bromelain based enzymatic debridement can be carried out safely in large-area burns” (Hofmaenner et al., 2020) but the literature is scant in these larger debridement areas.In our centre we have been using enzymatic debridement for resuscitation level burn injury since 2016. We have gained significant learning in this time; this article aims to describe our current protocol for enzymatic debridement in this patient population and highlight specific learning points that might aid other centres in using enzymatic debridement for larger burn injury.MethodWe performed a search of the IBID database to identify all adult patients who satisfied the inclusion criteria of resuscitation level burn injury (defined as total burn surface area (TBSA) ≥15% in patients aged >16 years), or level 3 admission following burn injury and who underwent Enzymatic Debridement. A case note review was completed, and details comprising patient demographics, TBSA, mechanism of burn, presence of inhalation injury, sequencing of debridement, length of ICU and hospital stay, blood product utilisation and the need for autografting were recorded. No ethical approval has been sought for this retrospective review.ResultsWe identified 29 patients satisfying the inclusion criteria (Table 1). Between June 2016 and June 2020 the average total burn size of patients who had at least some of their burn treated by enzymatic debridement increased from 21.4% in 2016/17 to 34.7% in 2019/20. In these patients the actual area treated by enzymatic debridement also increased from 11.9% TBSA to 20.3% TBSA. 19 patients (66%) had enzymatic debridement performed within 24 h of injury, a further 2 patients (7%) within 48 h after injury. Patients were more likely to have enzymatic debridement commenced in the first 24 h after injury if they had circumferential limb injury (39% vs 9%) or were planned for enzyme only debridement (78% vs 28%). Those who were planned for combination enzyme and surgical debridement were more likely to have enzymatic debridement commenced after the first 48 h (75%). We have performed enzymatic debridement overnight on one occasion, for a patient who presented with circumferential limb injury and was determined to undergo urgent debridement.ConclusionMuch of the literature has described the use of enzymatic debridement in smaller burns, and specialist areas. However, it is our opinion that the advantages of enzymatic debridement appear to be greater in larger burns with a facility for whole burn excision on the day of admission in the ICU cubicle. We have demonstrated significantly reduced blood loss, improved dermal preservation, reduced need for autografting, and a reduction in the number of trips to theatre. We would advocate that both the team and the patient need to be as prepared as they would be for a traditional surgical excision. The early part of our learning curve for enzymatic debridement in resuscitation level injuries was steep, and we were able to build on experience from managing smaller injuries. We recommend any team wishing to using enzymatic debridement gain experience in the same way and develop robust local pathways prior to attempting use in larger burn injuries.     

Coagulation dysfunction of severe burn patients: A potential cause of death

BackgroundResearch on coagulation dysfunction following burns is controversial. This study aimed to describe the coagulation changes in severe burn patients by examining coagulation parameters.MethodsPatients with third-degree total body surface area (TBSA) burns of ≥30% were enrolled between 2017 and 2020. Platelet (PLT) count and coagulation indexes (including APTT, INR, FIB, DD, and AT Ⅲ) were measured at admission and once weekly for 8 weeks, and statistical analysis was performed. The patient medical profiles were reviewed to extract demographic and clinical data, including TBSA, third-degree TBSA, and inhalation injury. The total intravenous fluids and transfusions of crystalloids, fresh frozen plasma (FFP), and red blood cells (RBC) were calculated during the forty-eight-hour period. The number of sepsis cases was recorded.ResultsWe enrolled 104 patients , and while the overall coagulation trend fluctuated, inflection points appeared around one week and demonstrated hypercoagulability. INR was significantly higher in the non-survival group than in the survivors' group from admission to three weeks after burn (all p<0.01). From post-injury week 1 to post-injury week 3, the APTT in the non-survival group was greater than in the survival group, but the non-survival group's PLT count was lower than that in the survival group (all p<0.05). At two and three weeks after burns, the FIB levels in the non-survival group were significantly lower than those of the survival group (both p<0.01). The prevalence of inhalation injury and the proportion of sepsis cases were significantly higher in the non-survival group than in the survival group ( p ＜ 0.05, p ＜ 0.001, respectively). At the time of death, APTT, INR, and FDP levels were significantly higher in the non-survival group in the survivor group, and FIB, ATIII, and PLT were significantly lower than in the survivor group (all p<0.01). On the day of death, nine of the 12 dead patients had disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC).ConclusionsCoagulation dysfunction was most prominent in severe burn patients 1 week after injury and presented as hypercoagulability. Large-area burn injury, large amounts of fluid resuscitation, inhalation injury, and sepsis may all contribute to coagulation dysfunction, which can further develop into DIC and even death in severe burns patients.     

Severe burns in Australian and New Zealand adults: Epidemiology and burn centre care

IntroductionStudies describing the epidemiology of severe burns (>20% total body surface area) in adults are limited despite the extensive associated morbidity and mortality. This study aimed to describe the epidemiology of severe burn injuries admitted to burn centres in Australia and New Zealand.Materials and methodsData from the Burns Registry of Australia and New Zealand (BRANZ) were used in this study. Patients were eligible for inclusion if they were admitted between August 2009 and June 2013, were adults (18-years or older), and had burns of 20% total body surface area (TBSA) or greater. Demographics, burn characteristics and in-hospital mortality risk factors were investigated using multivariable Cox proportional hazards analysis.ResultsThere were 496 BRANZ registered patients who met the inclusion criteria. Over half of the patients were aged 18–40 years and most were male. The median (IQR) TBSA was 31 (25–47). Most (75%) patients had burns involving <50% TBSA, 58% sustained their burn injury at home, and 86% had sustained flame burns. Leisure activities, working for income and preparing food together accounted for over 48% of the activities undertaken at the time of injury. The in-hospital mortality rate was 17% and the median (IQR) length of stay was 24 (12–44) days. Seventy-two percent were admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU) and 40% of patients had an associated inhalation injury. Alcohol and/or drug involvement was suspected in 25% of cases.ConclusionThis study describes the demographics, burn injury characteristics and in-hospital outcomes of severe burn injuries in adults whilst also identifying key predictors of inpatient mortality. Key findings included the over-representation of young males, intentional self-harm injuries and flame as a cause of burns and highlights high risk groups to help aid in the development of targeted prevention strategies.     

Contributors to the length-of-stay trajectory in burn-injured patients

Objectives

Burn patients have a highly variable length-of-stay (LOS) due to the complexity of the injury itself. The LOS for burn patients is estimated as one day per percent total body surface area (TBSA) burn. To focus care expectation and prognosis we aimed to identify key factors that contribute to prolonged LOS.

烧伤合并中重度吸入性损伤的早期救治

目的：为提高中重度吸入性损伤治疗水平,探讨中重度吸入性损伤早期救治的方法。方法：对32例烧伤合并中重度吸入性损伤患者实施“四早”救治方案,即：早期气管切开;早期充分给氧;早期气道湿化、灌洗;早期纤维支气管镜检查及治疗。32例患者中,烧伤面积〈30％TBSA16例,30％～50％TBSA10例,〉50％TB—SA6例;Ⅲ度烧伤面积〈10％TBSA17例,10％～20％TBSA6例,〉20％TBSA9例。救治过程中观察患者气道黏膜损伤情况及愈合时间,监测气道灌洗前后、纤支镜治疗前后30min患者的心率、呼吸频率及动脉血气变化,纤支镜治疗前后痰标本作细菌培养。结果：32例中治愈28例,死亡4例,2例死于急性呼吸窘迫综合征,2例死于肺部严重感染,病死率12．5％;气道的愈合与黏膜损伤程度密切相关,与损伤部位关系不明显;气道灌洗前后和纤支镜治疗前后,患者的动脉血氧饱和度、动脉血氧分压升高,心率、呼吸频率减慢,动脉血pH值降低;纤支镜肺泡灌洗后气道内病原菌明显减少。中重度吸入性损伤患者应用“四早”救治方案后,显著地提高了救治的成功率。结论：对中重度吸入性损伤患者按“四早”方案进行救治是有效可行的。     

Identification of substance use disorders in burn patients using simple diagnostic screening tools (AUDIT/DAST-10)

Introduction and objectivesSubstance use is disproportionately high in burn patients and associated with adverse outcomes. Screening methods for substance use disorders may help predict or avoid adverse outcomes.The University of Utah Burn Center records self-reported Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Tests (AUDIT) and Drug Abuse Screening Tests (DAST-10) for all adult burn admissions. This study assessed for association between AUDIT/DAST-10 scores and burn patient outcomes.MethodsA retrospective chart review of adult burn patients admitted to the University of Utah from 05/01/2014–06/30/2017. Patient demographics, injury data, and substance use data were collected and analyzed.Results322 patients underwent AUDIT/DAST-10 screening (n = 322). 56 (17.4%) had positive AUDIT screens (score ≥ 8). 15/50 with alcohol use at time of injury (TOI) had negative AUDIT screens. Median AUDIT score with TOI alcohol use was 12, without TOI alcohol use was 1. 30/55 patients offered alcohol counseling accepted.14 patients (4.3%) had positive DAST-10 screens (score ≥3). 9/25 with drug use at TOI had negative DAST-10 screens. No patients without TOI drug use had DAST-10 scores >2. 9/11 patients offered drug counseling accepted.Mean standardized length of stay (LOS) per TBSA burn injury was 1.7 days for positive AUDIT, 1.6 days for negative AUDIT. Median standardized LOS was 1.4 days for positive DAST-10, 1.7 days for negative DAST-10.ConclusionsAUDIT and DAST-10 screens can identify burn patients with problematic substance use, allowing early intervention. Positive screening scores do not independently predict longer hospital stays, increased wound severity, or treatment noncompliance.     

A three decade analysis of factors affecting burn mortality in the elderly

This study's objective was to identify variables that affect the mortality of elderly burn patients and to assess their changes over time. A retrospective review was conducted on all patients 75 or older (n = 201) admitted to a university-based burn center between 1972 and 2000. Variables examined were age, sex, TBSA, ABSI, inhalation injury, timing from burn to operative intervention, the number of surgical procedures, the number of pre-morbid conditions, and mortality. There were 95 fatalities. TBSA strongly correlated with mortality (p < 0.0001). Adjusting for TBSA and inhalation injury, mortality significantly decreased (p = 0.04, odds ratio = 0.58). Mortality significantly increased with inhalation injury (p < 0.01). Fatality risk increased by 400% with inhalation injury. Absence of inhalation injury was not significant with respect to mortality in the 1970s, however there was a significant decrease (p = 0.02) in mortality without an inhalation injury in the 1980s and 1990s. ABSI was strongly predictive of mortality (p < 0.0001). On average there was a 200% increase in mortality per unit increase of ABSI. The elderly are 58% less likely to die from burns now as compared to the 1970s. Although mortality rose with increasing TBSA equally in each decade, the absolute risk of mortality decreased over time. This data suggests major strides have been made in burn care, however similar success has not been achieved with inhalation injuries.     

The effect of neighborhood Area Deprivation Index on residential burn injury severity

IntroductionResidential fires account for the majority of burn-related injuries and fatalities. Established risk factors for burn injury include male gender, racial minority, children and elderly individuals, poverty, and substandard housing characteristics. In North Carolina, the rate of residential fire injuries and deaths is higher than the national average. Therefore, we sought to describe residential fire hospitalizations at a large regional burn center and describe the neighborhoods in which they live. We hypothesized that patients living in areas with higher Area Deprivation Index (ADI) are more likely to have major residential burns.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis of burn admissions from January 2002 to December 2015. We dichotomized patients into two cohorts: residential and non-residential burns and performed a bivariate analysis. Multivariate Poisson regression models were utilized to determine if ADI was associated with inhalation injury and ≥20% total body surface area burn.ResultsOf the 10,506 patients presented during the study period. Of these, 10,016 (95.3%) patients resided in North Carolina, and 7894 (78.8%) had a residential burn. Of the overall cohort, 6.0% (n = 458) of patients had ≥20% TBSA burns and 6.4% (n = 506) had inhalation injury. The majority of patients were in the highest (most disadvantaged) ADI quartile (n = 3050, 39.5%), and only 6.8% of patients (n = 525) were in the lowest (least disadvantaged) ADI quartile. In the Poisson multivariate regressions to determine if the ADI was associated with severe burns, patients in the highest ADI quartile had an increased relative risk of ≥20% TBSA burn (RR 1.31, 95% CI 1.02–1.68) and inhalation injury (RR 1.39, 95% CI 1.09–1.76) when compared to patients in the second-lowest ADI quartile when controlled for pertinent covariates.ConclusionResidential structure fires represent the major source of burns and fatalities. People who reside in the highest ADI quartile are more like to present with higher burn injury severity in terms of burn size and the presence of inhalation injury. The use of the ADI to target neighborhoods for burn prevention is imperative.     

Cost-drivers of medical expenses in burn care management

BackgroundProfound differences exist in the cost of burn care globally, thus we aim to investigate the affected factors and to delineate a strategy to improve the cost-effectiveness of burn management.MethodsA retrospective analysis of 66 patients suffering from acute burns was conducted from 2013 to 2015. The average age was 26.7 years old and TBSA was 42.1% (±25.9%). We compared the relationship between cost and clinical characteristics.ResultsThe estimated cost of acute burn care with the following formula (10,000 TWD) = −19.80 + (2.67 × percentage of TBSA) + (124.29 × status of inhalation injury) + (147.63 × status of bacteremia) + (130.32 × status of respiratory tract infection).ConclusionThe majority of the cost were associated with the use of antibiotics and burns care. Consequently, it is crucial to prevent nosocomial infection in order to promote healthcare quality and reduce in-hospital costs.     

First aid is associated with improved outcomes in large body surface area burns

BackgroundAnimal studies indicate treating burn injuries with running water (first aid) for 20 min up to 3 h after burn reduces healing time and scarring. We have previously demonstrated the benefits of first aid in minor burn injuries with respect to a reduction in wound depth, faster healing, and decreased skin grafting utilisation. The purpose of this cohort study was to assess the effect of first aid on clinical outcomes in large body surface area burn injuries (≥20%).MethodsData was prospectively collected for patients with ≥20% TBSA burns from 2004– 2018. Multivariate regression analysis was used to determine the association of adequate first aid with 8 outcomes – mortality, total length of stay, total body surface area (TBSA), percentage/proportion of TBSA that was full thickness [PFTI], TBSA grafted, number of re-grafting sessions, intensive care admission, and intensive care length of stay. Adequate first aid was defined as the application of 20 min of cool, running tap water up to 3 h following the burn injury.Findings390 patients were identified. Adequate first aid was received in 35.6% (139) of patients. There was a trend towards a reduction in mortality (OR 0.37; 95% CI 0.12–1.13; P = 0.08). Patients who received adequate first aid had a statistically significant 9.8% reduction in TBSA (95% CI −13.6% to −6.1%; P < 0.0001) as well as a 12% lower PTFI compared to patients who received inadequate first aid (95% CI −19% to −4%; P < 0.01). Whilst there was no significant effect of adequate first aid on the TBSA grafted (P = 0.37), adequate first aid was associated with a significantly less number of re-grafting sessions (95% CI −-0.29 to −0.08; P < 0.001).InterpretationAdequate first aid with 20 min of running water is associated with improved outcomes in large burn injuries. Significant benefits are seen in a reduction in TBSA, proportion of the burn wound that is full thickness, as well as decreased re-grafting. This has significant patient and health system benefits and adds to the body of evidence supporting 20 min of cooling in burns care.     

Impact of diagnostic bronchoscopy in burned adults with suspected inhalation injury

IntroductionInhalation injury is a common complication of thermal trauma. Fiberoptic bronchoscopy (FOB) is regarded as current standard practice in diagnosing and grading inhalation injury. Nonetheless, its predictive value in terms of therapeutic decision-making and clinical outcome is controversial.MethodsAdult burn patients with inhalation injury (InI) were selected from the National Burn Repository of the American Burn Association. Subjects were propensity score pair-matched based on injury severity and grouped based on whether or not FOB had been performed (FOB, CTR, respectively). Mortality, incidence of pneumonia, length of hospitalization, length of ICU stay and dependency on mechanical ventilation were compared between the two groups.Results3014 patients were matched in two groups with a mean TBSA of 22.4%. There was no significant difference in carboxyhemoglobin fraction at admission. Patients, who underwent FOB on admission had a significantly increased incidence of pneumonia (p < 0.001), mortality (p < 0.05), length of hospitalization (p = 0.002), ICU stay (p < 0.001) and duration of mechanical ventilation (p = 0.006). In a subgroup analysis of patients with TBSA of at least 20%, incidence of pneumonia was significantly higher in the FOB group (p < 0.001) and longer mechanical ventilation was required (p = 0.036).DiscussionDiagnosis and grading of InI through FOB is the current standard, although its predictive value regarding key outcome parameters and therapeutic decision-making, remains unclear. The potential procedural risk of FOB itself should be considered. This study demonstrates correlations of FOB with major clinical outcomes in both a general collective of burned adults as well as severely burned adults. Although these findings must be interpreted with caution, they may induce further research into potential harm of FOB and critical review of routine diagnostic FOB in suspected inhalation injury in thermally injured patients.     

Characteristics and outcomes of patients with inhalation injury treated at a military burn center during U.S. combat operations

BackgroundThe purpose of this study was to examine risk factors for mortality in burned patients with inhalation injury (II). We further sought to compare a cohort of burned military service members to civilian patients with II.MethodsWe identified patients treated at our burn center over a 10-year period. Demographics, injury characteristics, and outcomes were compared between patients with and without II. Logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the impact of patient characteristics and II grade on mortality.Results3791 patients treated at our burn center met study inclusion criteria. 424 (11.2%) patients were diagnosed with II [II(+)]. Age, % total body surface area (TBSA) burned, % full thickness burned, intensive care unit (ICU) days, hospital days, and mortality were all greater in II(+) patients. Separating the II(+) patients into military and civilian groups, there was a higher incidence of grade 4 II and higher mortality for grades 2–4 II in military patients. Analyses demonstrated that military service was associated with increased mortality in II(+) patients. The bronchoscopic grade of II did not have an association with mortality in this population.ConclusionsII(+) patients were older, had larger burns, needed more ICU and hospital days, and had higher mortality rates. Among II(+) patients, military affiliation was associated with more severe II and increased mortality. Establishment of an objective grading system for II that is associated with mortality is a meaningful future research endeavor.     

Impact of inhalation injury on outcomes in critically ill burns patients: 12-year experience at a regional burns centre

IntroductionBurns inhalation injury increases the attributable mortality of burns related trauma. However, diagnostic uncertainties around bronchoscopically graded severity, and its effect on outcomes, remain. This study evaluated the impact of different bronchoscopic burns inhalation injury grades on outcomes.MethodsA single-centre cohort study of all patients admitted to the London Burns centre intensive care unit (BICU) over 12 years. Demographic data, burn and burns inhalation injury characteristics, and ICU-related parameters were collected retrospectively. The primary outcome was mortality. Secondary outcomes were hospital and ICU lengths of stay. The impact of pneumonia was determined. Univariate and multivariable Cox’s proportional hazards regression analyses informed factors predicting mortality.ResultsBurns inhalation injury was diagnosed in 84 of 231 (36%) critically ill burns patients; 20 mild (grade 1), 41 severe (grades 2/3) and 23 unclassified bronchoscopically. Median (IQR) total body surface area burned (TBSA) was 20% (10?40). Mortality was significantly higher in patients with burns inhalation injury vs those without burns inhalation injury (38/84 [45%] vs 35/147 [24%], p < 0.001). Patients with pneumonia had a higher mortality than those without (34/125 [27%] vs 8/71 [11%], p = 0.009). In multivariable analysis, severe burns inhalation injury significantly increased mortality (adjusted HR=2.14, 95%CI: 1.12–4.09, p = 0.022), compared with mild injury (adjusted HR=0.58, 95% CI: 0.18–1.86, p = 0.363). Facial burns (adjusted HR=3.13, 95%CI: 1.69–5.79, p < 0.001), higher TBSA (adjusted HR=1.05, 95%CI: 1.04–1.06, p < 0.001) and older age (adjusted HR=1.04, 95%CI: 1.02–1.07, p < 0.001) also independently predicted mortality, though pneumonia did not.ConclusionsSevere burns inhalation injury is a significant risk factor for mortality in critically ill burns patients. However, pneumonia did not increase mortality from burns inhalation injury. This work confirms prior implications of bronchoscopically graded burns inhalation injury. Further study is suggested, through registries, into the diagnostic accuracy and reliability of bronchoscopy in burns related lung injury.     

Tracheostomy in burns patients revisited

Objective

The use of tracheostomy in burns patients has been controversial. A retrospective study was conducted to assess the use, complications and outcome of tracheostomy in ventilated adult burns patients.

Methods

Data was collected retrospectively regarding the extent of injury in each patient, the indication for tracheostomy, and outcome in terms of length of stay, days of mechanical ventilation, airway and pulmonary complications and survival. Patients were followed until discharge from the unit or death.

Results

Comparing patients who received tracheostomy to those who had translaryngeal intubation showed similar age distribution and no significant difference in the total burn surface area (TBSA). The use of tracheostomy was significantly higher in patients with TBSA >60%. Inhalation injury was significantly higher and mean probability of survival (ABSI), significantly lower in patients receiving tracheostomy. Duration of mechanical ventilation, length of stay in HDU/ITU and the incidence of pulmonary sepsis were significantly higher in tracheostomy group patients. However, there was no significant difference in mortality between the two groups.

Conclusion

Burn survivors with TBSA >60% are more likely to undergo repeated surgery and have burns to the head and neck region, therefore increasing the requirement for tracheostomy. Tracheostomy is a safe procedure with minimal perioperative complications. Late complications in this patient group may be related to duration of intubation and mechanical ventilation and the presence of an airway burn.Tracheostomy was associated with a higher prevalence of chest infection. We suspect that the cause of this is multifactorial, possibly due to a higher incidence of inhalation injury, greater burn size and prolonged mechanical ventilation in this group.